only in the first person, it should be rolled out and told to our partners: i have a very simple solution, well listen, don't feed us with these stories about your complicated mechanism, i 'll tell you how complicated it all is for us, so what, we they chose a solution, they said that the package was allocated, yes, by the way, ukraine also took part in it, they involved their friends, and the congress took part, what right does a person now have to come out and speak, here we are. we didn't use that money, yes, but congress, everybody, is it your joint decision, that's what i want to ask, that is, now i think that the congress should press even here without names, why did this happen, why there, where in that decision, where was the victory plan, the allocation of funds, why there was no corresponding, even public report, why these funds are so are used in such a way, why were they not given concentrated weapons to ukraine this year, logistics are difficult, weapons are not always available. in warehouses, i

understand that, but it’s all the same, i know that our partners, the united states, are doing their best, i have those when they are assigned, when they are assigned, they, the american military, the american the national guard, they will pull all this, i know, these are people who do a huge job, well, they need political decisions, money and political guidance, and then the pentagon, intelligence and the state department will do everything, and the americans in this regard, they are very effective. .. professional, so these are purely political decisions related to the strategy of the united states, no more, no less, i affirm this and can provide arguments. thank you, mr. valery, i would like to remind our viewers that throughout our broadcast we conduct a survey, we ask you about like, do you take the kremlin's nuclear threats seriously, yes, no, everything is quite simple on youtube, either yes or no, write your own thoughts and comments under the video on youtube, if you see... us on tv, pick up

your smartphone or phone and vote by numbers. if you take the kremlin's nuclear threats seriously: 0800-211-381, not 0800-211-382. all calls to these numbers are free, vote, at the end of the program we will sum up the results of this vote. mr. valery, the statement of the minister of foreign affairs was made yesterday. radislav in poland sikorskyi about crimea and our closest neighbor says that crimea is symbolic, important for russia and for putin, and for ukraine, it is strategically important, so he does not see how the two countries will be able to come to an agreement without demilitarizing the peninsula, he proposes to transfer to 20 years crimea under the mandate of the un, what does it say? sikorsky, we could put crimea under

a un mandate to prepare an honest referendum after checking who are legal residents and so on, and we could postpone it for 20 years. in response, the ministry of foreign affairs of ukraine declared that compromises regarding the status of crimea and the territorial integrity of ukraine are inadmissible. crimea is the center of gravity of the european security architecture. its complete restoration is possible only after the complete de-occupation of the entire territory. of ukraine, including the ukrainian peninsula. mr. valery, how do you assess sikorsky's statement, considering that the un is not a powerful organization at the moment, whose mandate will be respected by russia. let me answer another question which is they put in fact, you will not find such a statement by the minister of legal affairs of poland in any public resource. except

zmi, right? and why and because it was said at an evening meeting as part of one of the forums there, and as a discussion of various options, i simply do not want to make radyslav sekorsky an enemy of the ukrainian people, but i can say that even in such discussions, even such respectable people may be wrong. i know, at least with all his achievements and consistency, i know a case where...... i was a part of it there process, and rosslav sikorsky made a mistake, in short, this is the 14th year, his maidan council, his coming to push for us to sign an agreement with yanukovych, not us, but for the people to agree, and he then convinced that this was the only way to get out of the crisis, nothing like that, everything did not go as radoslav sikorskyi said, but as we said, it went, so that such people are also wrong, they do not really understand our intricacies.

internal, despite the fact that i have a lot of respect for both him and his wife, that is, a lot i've known them for years, so don't make an enemy of him, this is the first part, the second, once... it became after the media a discussion of the essence of the issue, and there was a referendum and everything else, then this was the answer given by the ministry of foreign affairs, well, let's put it this way, russia is also there - to my own, well, this issue will not take off in any way with any referendums there, you and i know that in principle this is a match for russian positions, rather than the ukrainian return of crimea, so there is no need, i think that.. to blow up, why did it happen, i'll tell you what it was, first the downpour went, that the president of ukraine volodymyr zelensky behaves harshly with the poles, it appears in the polish press, and then suddenly it appears, and here the representative of poland also acts like this at such meetings of ours, that's

all, i think how it arose, this is emotional information the duel, it will end, there will be no further continuation, but if suddenly we hear such a ... position once again officially, from anyone, from radisław sikorski, from the polish government, if it is confirmed that they are calling for such a line, then yes, i would answer correctly, diplomatically, but not everything is even in the statement of the ministry of foreign affairs, there can be even clearer accents, this is an unacceptable position, it does not lead to anything good, because it is only pouring water into the mill. the russians in this situation, yes, those who say that in fact crimea remained russian, this is also their position regarding this statement by sikorsky, they also reflected and said that we do not have any need to hold any more referendums there, so well so far we have such

a reaction, another important decision that awaits ukraine is the decision to allow our westerners partners to strike with long-range weapons on the territory of the russian federation. last week , the president of the united states of america, joseph biden, met with the prime minister of great britain, keir starmer, and before that, the secretary of state of the united states of america and the minister of foreign affairs of great britain visited ukraine, they participated in the forum, in several forums that took place in ukraine. there was an expectation that after the meeting between the president of the united states of america and the prime minister of great britain, it would somehow be articulated the position of these two countries regarding the decision, or regarding the decision of only stormshedov, that these

missiles can fly over the territory of the russian federation, and even gardian wrote about the fact that great britain has almost already made such a decision. everything, everything is clear in this story, or it is possible, this decision can be, but it can be articulated publicly already after these missiles fly over the territory of the russian federation. well, i would like to emphasize the fact that we are talking about long-range missiles. actually, these are short-range missiles. such missiles, maybe a little less distance, we had them, we simply already used them, such missiles, well, i have z.u, there, the same missiles that were still there in small quantities produced before the large-scale invasion, that is, it is not not

new, not new missiles for ukraine, we have the right to use them, moreover, i think that we really hope... that in the near future we will see a wider application of ukrainian-made missiles of such a range, that is, a range of 300, 500 and up to 1000 km, this is a short range, i i think that we have lost information, i read all our rocket journalists, well, the long-range is correct, it is a comparison, yes, with what we have today, but these are no short-range missiles, long-range. missiles, i would think that these are long -range missiles, yes, there are more than 5,500 km, the average range of missiles is 1005, in this range, that is, what we are talking about with our partners, about the missiles that we have, we simply do not have enough of them, we are talking with partners,

we formulated the informational this submission incorrectly, we constantly emphasized when i i say we, of course, i did not emphasize this, but... i say, we, the ukrainians, the presidents, others emphasized, give us more missiles to hit, but not more missiles, give us accurate , humane weapons, there is a missile.. . with kuman weapons, because they, as it was in this tarapets, in my opinion, yes, in this tarapets, they definitely hit, well, they said there were drones, well, i think, something seems to me that there was a missile there, so , they definitely hit there, this is only my conclusion, i do not pretend that this is some kind of position, so as not to say, i read that somewhere, no, i just saw a video, i saw an explosion similar to... from rockets, so 500 are already being used there as far as 30 km, that is, we have our own, so nothing

new, just the number is less, and the russians use iskanders, they hit odesa, they kill people, ours beat humanely, exactly in warehouses, they do not kill residents, and what are we talking about next, and what are we begging, what are we begging from whom, that is, we should not beg, but just rush and everything will be thrown into production. these rockets of this type, and then no one would, well, it’s already been done, well, time has passed, and now , you know, what’s the difference, which missile will fly there to russia, one or the other, just the quantity is needed, and now, the quantity, it’s an escalation, no, because the russians got iranian ballistic missiles, the russians are getting korean ballistic missiles, what are we talking about, that is, this is, i think this is the moment where we can talk privately... tough, because tough, why, because when was the real moment that well, there

some arguments worked, then i can't understand, but now which arguments, no arguments, and which ones red lines, he kursk, the kursk region entered the territory of russia, what other arguments can you have, there are no arguments, only in public it is not necessary to blow it all up there, rather than publicly just show the situation, i think that... it will be resolved in reality, well, because there are no real arguments that the americans had before and our partners had, they are gone now, all those that were, have closed, due to the unreasonable actions of russia, the increase of escalation on their part, now, why do i say that i emphasize once again, this is humane, this is a high-precision sniper missile weapons, ukraine should be armed with exactly these types of weapons so that it is not contactable. with a kalashnikov or there even a juvelin,

namely contactless combat at a distance with uavs, with such missiles, with the same hymers, that is, this is what can somehow, at least a little , establish a balance with the russians, and in principle, well, i know, a long time ago we let's talk about it, of course i won't reveal the secret here that it's not something i made up there, our negotiators don't talk there, they talk. but for some reason, i still think that in this matter we could act creatively, well, more creatively, to bypass this such an inflexible political position, and now, i think it will be difficult to see it until the election day, and i think that already before the election day in the usa in november, well, i think that from the first days of november there after five we.. . saw the simple use of this type of partner missiles, now the question is of what

quantity, not only the quality, but the quantity, and by the way, germany, taurus, what arguments will chancellor scholtz have in order to keep these rockets, that is, it seems to me that this is all a political decision, it is overripe, but in fact we will find out sometime in november, already in the month of application, the european parliament appealed to the western partners of ukraine and asked, urged to immediately lift the restrictions on the strikes of ukraine by western weapons against the russian federation, the speaker of the state duma of the russian federation vyacheslav volodin criticized this appeal to the european parliament and once again threatened the west with nuclear weapons let's listen to what volodin said. just think about what they are discussing. they discuss the tasks of strikes on our peaceful cities, moreover,

they discuss, considering that it is not theirs touch, it's not like that, we will answer, and we have something to answer, more powerful weapons are ready, mr. valeriu, they have been announcing their powerful, more powerful weapons for so long, but judging by the fact that... cia director burns said about how he communicated with naryshkin in the 22nd year, at the end of the 22nd year, and warned the russians about the consequences of the application. of nuclear weapons against ukraine, because such a threat was, as burns said, whether they clearly understand in the kremlin what, what, what the consequences will be of the use of nuclear weapons weapons, whether tactical or strategic, of any kind, and how will it end for the current regime in russia? they

understand everything perfectly, don't listen to what volodin is saying there or from the podium of the state house. these are internal messages for them, there is a tsar, there are boyars, and there are serfs, and serfs must live in this understanding, there are so many lies fed to the serfs that it is hard to believe, russia will not use any strategic missiles, it is obvious from two reasons, first of all, the potential of russia is incomparable with the potential of the united states, together with britain, or, well if all were comparable. they say that everything will be destroyed there, in fact, russia knows that they fly like that, not that every once in a while, the missile itself, but what about the charges, they don’t know at all, even though i, you know, these bots fly in when i comment, that russia has not conducted nuclear tests, but i state again, unlike the usa, which found a way

to test without an actual explosion of a large-scale nuclear warhead, russia does not have such technology, and therefore in russia. there are no normal nuclear weapons tests, without normal test, no country will use nuclear weapons, except at such a moment when hundreds of warheads are flying at you there, only at this moment it is already desperate, in another situation it will not be used, this is the first, second, why would they use nuclear weapons if they blew up the tile , that is, it was a man-made operation with enormous consequences, and in operational terms, it was also an operation. further, they have the zaporozhye station under control, which is constantly under threat, we do not know this, but specialists there are always aware of the situation sometimes they hang around, sometimes they decrease, and when they hit our transformers at nuclear power plants, which then endanger the normal operation of nuclear power plants, in the crimea, if the west,

the crimean titan, or whatever it is called there now, it is also dangerous object, we have 17 thousand. before the russians invaded 17 such dangerous facilities on our territory, yes, why should they, they first of all think about how to use it in reality, and not nuclear weapons, which they constantly threaten there, i.e. nuclear weapons - this is for china they have a balance, it is for another, but it is definitely not for this war, and the second thing is that they know that if only they do it. one tactical charge will be used there, that's it, they, them, they are over, they are over, putin knows it, that is, they do not have such comparable forces to withstand such a confrontation, they were warned, so i believe that the threat is nuclear , it's in the course of the war as we see it now, it's not something that doesn't exist, it exists,

but the way it's being inflated, out of fear, you know, actually the paradox is... because that the russians have died now, i would say so, ten times more than the russians, only, only the military, only those who entered our land ten times more than would have died from a few tactical nuclear warheads, you understand that they they just don't explain to their people, people don't know on what scale they are being killed there, so we need to give more information, not to follow their line, partners to explain the situation, i would pay more attention now to objects like zaporizhia nuclear plant, which are captured by the russians, this is a real threat. well, by the way, president zelenskyy today welcomed the magathe resolution, which confirms the need for ukraine to restore full control over the zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant and withdraw russian

troops and personnel from this plant, he reminded that nuclear safety is the first. clause of the peace formula, to quote president zelensky: "i am glad to see that today's resolution of the general conference of the magats" contributes to these important efforts. only through collective determination and principled action will we be able to compel the aggressor, stop the blackmail and terror - zelensky wrote on the social network x. mr. valery, does the resolution oblige the magathe to react to russia and why... can the magathe apply to russia and to rosatom, in particular , some sanctions, because we know that russia is building a lot of nuclear power plants to everything to the university and no one has yet applied any sanctions against rosatom, if i am not mistaken,

there are one or two cases of personal sanctions against rosatom, but you are right that rosatom somehow feels very comfortable in this situation, and the reasons for not applying sanctions against rasatom - this is not magate, let's be fair, this is the decision of many countries, including european countries, and the usa, yes. this also surprises me, because sanctions against rosat should have been imposed a long time ago. now regarding the magat, they are already adopting the second such resolution in the un, they also mentioned these issues. magat is a structure of oonivsk. but the most interesting thing is that mr. grosti always says, it is not a question of whether you can talk about leaving the station, here we find that at the level of the general conference, that is, it everything is declared when gathered. 150 members of the un, well, 178 are members of the magat, well, 150 have gathered now for the 68th, it seems, general conference in vienna. therefore, everything is fine, the magat can

make such statements, and it is our task for ukraine to make as many such statements, resolutions, and binding documents as possible for two purposes: first, it is a constant process of pressure on the zaporizhia nuclear power plant to be released, because it in danger because of the occupation now. first of all, and also the people who work there, the russians couldn't to start their own, to replace ukrainians, and there people keep it all professionals simply so that it does not explode, that is, they keep it all, and it is already the third year, so it is all very difficult, that is the question, and the second question is the responsibility then for these crimes, it is still necessary to consider the convention on nuclear terrorism, i.e. it is still not... reached, why not? i will tell you a very good example, the resolution, the president stated, i see, the prime minister stated, everyone made statements, in fact, in fact, this is just an example when the ministry of foreign affairs of ukraine

is working correctly, we must give credit to mr. tsimbalyuk, when he was in vienna, he was engaged in this as a representative, and now, when we had an absolutely unjustified pause with the appointment of pospred in vienna, he took it up. from kyiv, and when, i think so, the minister is new, it is also visible, he paid attention to these issues, and the work began, they worked there week after week in difficult conditions, i will remind you that there are still elections for another body of the magat , in addition to the general conference, there is also a board of governors, 11 new countries were elected, as far as i know, we met with these countries, that is, normal diplomatic work went on, so i have a big question... what can we do here, and can the ministry of foreign affairs? why do we have a delegation in the governing council of the magat, which does not cope with its tasks, as we see

what can be achieved, why then, well, why let it be decided in the office, the minister of energy heads it, they go to vienna a couple of times, that's all this, well, you know, not that, well, the minister of energy has a task here in ukraine, we have a winter that we don't know how to pass, and the minister of vienna is traveling here... i would change the first, well at least japarova, who is not present today, is no longer working, replaced by tsimbalyuk in the delegation of the board of governors, and the second would still be considered based on the results of the work, considered would replace the head of the delegation, this is a task that will increase efficiency, this is a concrete example of how it worked well in this particular case, but the russians work constantly, the russian representative meets and has dinner with money. well, well, i don't know, there every week is having dinner, ours can have dinner, will talk, maybe only the ambassador, but we don’t have an ambassador, there is no post-predator, so these are simple

questions, they add efficiency and there should be a solution, i think that this issue is overdue, to manage in the city the manager has a diplomat, this is the first, and now at least give the representative of the ministry of foreign affairs, the authorized pomagt more. resources, work opportunities, he showed tsymbalyuk that he can achieve this even with kyiv. mr. valery, at the very end of our long conversation, i would like to show you and the tv viewers a fragment from the interview ukrainian truth, the eu ambassador to ukraine, katarina maternova, who says that the realistic forecast is that ukraine can join the european union by the end of this decade. let's hear what she said. i have already said in an interview before, and i will repeat, i believe that the goal set by president michel is the accession of ukraine to the eu. by

the end of this decade is realistic, yes, i think it is realistic, but joining the eu, and it must be realized, is not only a technical process of membership negotiations, which of course also takes time, and this is also political ratification in all member states, because the entry of a new member means a change in the eu treaty, so it must be ratified in the format required by each of the eu countries, and this always takes a certain amount of time, yes. well, that is, mr. valery, there are 6 years ahead, if, if we start from this deadline, which is until the end of this decade, six years are for us to go through all the procedures for joining the european union, or if we will go through it so quickly, in view of the claims of some of our neighbors on various issues? first, without

joining nato or somehow guaranteeing the security of this umbrella from russia, there are no further prospects, no eu will help this situation, the eu is not involved in this, there are no effective levers in the security sphere, so i look at it calmly, on the contrary, i think that the prime minister's statements that we should enter by the end of next year sound more threatening to me than a knife. that mrs. materno said that we have time, because in fact the path to the eu is, i understand that we accept the rules of the european union, but still some there must be adaptation, our farmers, many of our producers are simply not ready for it today, and politically it is just to be in the eu, well, it is important, but when you have not provided security, it does not give anything, so i look at it calmly, i think that she is closer to ms. maternova, yes, because... this is just

the budget of the european union, in order for there to be enlargement, the budget must be calculated, you understand, and the 30th year is just tied to the procedures that 's all about the european union, but what our people are saying there, that next year in two years, that's it completely unrealistic plans, that is why i am alarmed by the political part, yes, that is, in principle, it is correctly said that it is necessary, that there was ratification, but if it is meant that ukraine unilaterally accepts all political demands, does it start... or from the historical memory yati, starting from there, give up your heroes, it's either that hungarians demand something new every time, well, you know, this is the kind of blackmail that we should not allow to use the negotiations with the eu on chapters on joining the european union as a political tool for our neighbors, i would say so, because mainly they are neighbors, i.e. poland and hungary, then...

then slovakia, we will see all this, and there will be new liras, leaders, there will be politics, elections, and constantly us they will keep this, you know, bait, what do you want in the eu, then let's give it to us, you need it, so now i would emphasize nato, security, the poet said to our partners, listen, integration the eu is a two-way street, and let's face it, ukraine is in a hurry. taking his time, calmly working on negotiating position, we have made political decisions, ukraine will be in the eu, it is a candidate, we will calmly work on the working bureaucratic agenda, and nato is an issue that needs to be resolved this year or next year, that is the key issue here. thank you, mr. valery, for the conversation, it was valery chaly, diplomat, plenipotentiary and extraordinary ambassador of ukraine. friends, we continue to work live on

the espress tv channel. i remind you that throughout our broadcast we conduct a survey and ask you about this, whether you perceive it take seriously the kremlin's nuclear threats against ukraine and ukraine. so it's quite simple on youtube, yes no, and there's also a function to leave your comment on this, that's the first, well, let's look at the results of the interim survey of the tv 33%, yes. 67%, no. september discounts on lactial, 20% in pharmacies, plantain, bam and savings. in september, there are discounts on relief, 10% in podorozhnyk, bam and oskad pharmacies. september discounts on rezi table, 10% in podorozhnyk, bam and oskad pharmacies. in march, there are discounts on...