finding out, it seems logical that ukraine has been able to achieve significant results using drones, which are much easier to shoot down, that it can do even more with atakam and storm shadow ballistic missiles, as well as cruise missiles, potentially weakening russia's ability to continue the war. according to british military intelligence, with reference to the ukrainian general staff, russia loses more than 1,100 soldiers killed or wounded every day. and as of today , it has suffered more than 610 thousand human losses. this level of losses is unacceptable in early perspective. although putin can continue to throw people into battle. these forces are insufficiently qualified and insufficiently trained. in eastern ukraine, the attack on pokrovsk is of great importance, and if pokrovsk is captured, it will be a serious blow to ukraine's operations in the region. however , it is unlikely that russia will be able to take advantage of any...breakthroughs in the east due to a lack of

the necessary equipment and personnel, and even if putin is showing confidence, it seems unlikely that russia is able to end the war on its own terms. yes, it is extremely important, but the key story is how to make putin stop demanding peace from us at our expense, you see, this is the most dangerous situation, putin is regularly shelling us, putin is raising the level of aggression, they are trying to keep it at... the current level just for the sake of it to tear us out of this bloody agreement on something, it will not happen, unless, of course, the united states, great britain, france , etc., will set very clear negotiation parameters, and we understand that at one time, when putin met with by president joseph biden, he offered him to divide the world, it was a few years ago, accordingly, we in ukraine understand that an attempt to transform the world is underway.

the struggle for major geopolitical influence continues, yes, but the key task is to ensure that it is not at the expense of ukraine, that it is not at the expense of our state and our territories, yes, well, how do you think the leading players will play now, yes, because if putin even agrees to certain negotiations so that it is not at the expense of ukraine, perhaps his something interested in africa, maybe something in the pacific basin or in the indian ocean, but... not at the expense of ukraine and our internationally recognized borders. i don't think that we are talking about some big geopolitical agreement in which western leaders offer president putin concessions anywhere in the world. washington works to solve every problem, such as this war, as a separate issue. the us is taking a problem-solving approach, not a broad geopolitical strategy, as the russians might imagine. for

washington it is absolutely necessary that the war ended on terms acceptable to ukraine. otherwise, president putin will continue his aggression. moldova may be next, followed by georgia, and possibly both countries at the same time. if putin is not stopped in these countries, he may threaten eastern nato members such as latvia or estonia. it must be stopped now and that's it. if this is not done, he will simply postpone his aggression by military means. in the regions i mentioned, whatever geopolitical ambitions exist in the global south, be it president lula in brazil or sydzenpin in china, they did not change the focus of the us and its allies, the main priority is to stop putin and russia in ukraine and eventually reach a peace agreement acceptable to ukrainians. recent opinion polls show that while about 50% of ukrainians may... support

a cease-fire, more than 75% reject any cease-fire that involves handing over ukrainian territory to russia, so western leaders, especially in the biden and garis administrations, are likely will support the will of the ukrainian people. president trump if re-elected, has said he intends to end the war before taking office. however, he may propose a deal that would require ukraine to give up territory in exchange for peace. ultimately, ukraine itself must decide on its own course. this makes it more urgent than ever to allow the ukrainian government to use longer -range weapons deep into russian territory, as this will make it more difficult for russia to launch attacks on ukrainian infrastructure and civilians. finally , in august, there were speculations about negotiations between russia and ukraine regarding the cessation of attacks on energy infrastructure. each other probably through

the mediation of qatar. i think these talks are still ongoing, although putin may not want to appear as if he is giving in to ukrainian pressure after the invasion of ukraine. and not in kurdsk. the fact that these talks are ongoing suggests that putin is looking for ways to de-escalate, given the high price russia is paying. even if putin pretends that he is ready to make any sacrifices. dear mr. ambassador bryza, but ukraine also has the opportunity to raise the level of escalation. extremely important strikes on the military warehouses of the russian federation in the tver region demonstrated that with the help of drones we can... inflict low-level blows on our enemy, and we understand that the level of escalation can be raised not only by the kremlin, but also by ukraine. and the kremlin least of all did not expect this, and we understand that if the drone army will practice, the ukrainian drone army, practice military targets on the territory of the russian federation, the russians,

ordinary russians will also feel the burden of war. but putin is betting on something else, putin is betting on the destruction of our energy industry. during the winter for enormous suffering, possibly mass deaths and the death of our people, for the exodus, for the departure of a large part of the citizens of ukraine from our territory, and after that in the spring, he could offer one or another thing, this is putin's plan. it worries me that in all the western capitals this matter is understood and accordingly, but the pace of giving us military aid is not fast enough, is not satisfactory, and accordingly... the biden administration understands that putin wants to destroy our energy industry, so that the winter will be tragic, the kremlin is doing it, in fact they understand it, in berlin and london they also understand it and in paris, but at the moment we see these are putin's plans, from the ukrainian the only thing left for the side is to maintain and

perhaps even exceed the level of escalation in some ways, that's how it is. we have already touched on these issues, and i completely agree. in the language of your question: the fear of escalation did prevent the biden administration from issuing a permit on the use of weapons in the depths of russian territory. the absence of such permission only allows and encourages putin to continue destroying ukraine's energy infrastructure. it is obvious that london wants to convince washington to grant ukraine permission for more effective protection. while the attacks on the ukrainian energy infrastructure continue. it looks like discussions are underway that could lead to a deal. under which ukraine and russia will stop attacking each other's energy infrastructure. this could be a constructive step towards changing the momentum and the direction of the conflict. in addition, ukraine's success in advancing into russian-held territory to protect its northern regions,

especially around sumy, has changed the psychology of the conflict from a perceived stalemate to one where ukraine is perceived as a capable and innovative state. newly. the drone strike in western tver oblast, which targeted russian ammunition, missile and cluster bomb depots, demonstrates ukraine's effectiveness in reducing russia's ability to strike ukraine with this devastating weapons, even with much less powerful drones compared to the atakoms and storm shadow missiles, i certainly expect washington and london to eventually give the go-ahead, and once ukraine starts... using these more effective weapons, i'm sure we'll see a change momentum of the war in favor of ukraine. here's what might make putin more willing to negotiate in good faith. dear mr. ambassador brydze, look, the president of the united states, joseph biden,

does not have much time left to work for position fortunately, he is not currently personally experiencing the election campaign, he does not go to pennsylvania and does not assure that there is a peace plan in... this, the key task of president joseph biden is to enter history, i don't know, winston entered at one time churchill, when winston churchill said: "no, we will destroy hitler." i do not idealize churchill, but joseph biden now has a few months to make a decision at the level of an outstanding, great, political and military figure of the world, that is, he can give ukraine certain permissions and maybe, increase the denomination. the tour of weapons, long-range weapons and aviation, that is, joseph biden can play to the end, will he go to a similar one, or will he be a hostage of the election campaign of the democrats? president biden is deeply convinced that ukraine should not lose

this war. i would like him to state more clearly that ukraine must win this war and define what that means. if pressed on him, i think he would say that ukraine's victory in the war means the cessation of hostilities on the terms determined by ukraine. biden will keep all integrity authorities until the inauguration of the new president on january 20, 2025. not only does he have the right to make decisions as he sees fit, but there is no problem with the fact that his political career will soon be over, so his main consideration is how any action he takes to aid to ukraine, could affect us domestic politics and the outcome of the 2024 election, although biden is definitely thinking about how his decisions could affect the chances of presidential candidate harris against the president... because americans, when it comes to comes to the election of the president are usually more focused on other issues, so

now biden has a relatively free hand to do what he thinks is right, for obvious reasons, he is concerned about the possibility of russia escalating to the use of nuclear weapons, but last year , when it emerged that president putin might be planning to use nuclear weapons on the battlefield, biden sent cia director bill burns to moscow to warn... that in such a scenario the us would intervene militarily and destroy russian troops on the territory of ukraine. obviously, such a threat deterred putin. in my opinion, president biden remains as committed to helping ukraine as before. his hands are much looser now than when he was running for president. and while russia's invasion of ukraine probably won't be a deciding factor in the us election, it could have a small impact on the outcome. difference, as this election is expected to be very tense. and returning,

for example, to the beginning of our conversation, when we we are talking about one or another negotiations, i don't know, behind the scenes, semi-public and even public, well, we understand that in general similar things, they are concluded in what are called some informal agreements, but we understand that informal agreements with putin, well, it can't be, yes, because he made a mockery of all international treaties in which russia participated. that is, either not fulfilling them, or simply based on them, well, we will not mention the so -called budapest memorandum anymore, but if everything anyway, somewhere in a couple of months, maybe up to six months, we will see a certain freezing of the situation, a weakening of the intensity of fighting on the front line, so we will understand that something is most likely happening, but someone must be the guarantor of those agreements that may not be signed on paper, and if... even if they signed on paper, what would it look like? at the moment, it is too early to talk about

a potential guarantor, because putin has not yet decided to end the war, he continues to throw as many people as possible to the front lines so that they stopped ukrainian bullets and bombs. however, there will come a time, if the united states, great britain and their allies authorize the use of long-range missiles deep into russian territory, when putin will have to do one... as you suggest, mr. borkovsky, everything that is written on paper like the budapest memorandum, it doesn't matter to putin, he understands only one language - the language of the overwhelming power, so his armed forces must be degraded to such an extent that he is no longer able to continue this war against ukraine. as we know from the 1930s, in particular from the secret agreements between nazi germany and the soviet union, that... leaders in moscow used to break agreements when it was convenient for them. for example, despite prior

agreements, stalin's plans to invade poland led to world war ii. the same applies to putin, he does not care what is written on paper. thus, it is first necessary to reduce the military potential of russia, and only after that one should think about the methods of verification of any agreement. verification can include a set of states, guarantors or other formal mechanisms. successfully developed methods for verifying nuclear arsenals during the cold war, so it is quite possible to develop a similar approach, and yet, before considering a peace agreement and ways to guarantee it, the main focus should be on reducing russia's military potential. and the last question, i will formulate it briefly: and trump, is he telling the truth, or is there some kind of electoral chaos in his head, that is, he gives a lot of different signals about how he sees things. conversations with by putin i don't think his default position is to tell

the truth. trump is always manipulative and says whatever comes to his mind and whatever he thinks will help him at that moment. he considers himself a great politician and thinks that he can somehow convince or force ukraine and russia to stop the war. however, he hardly has a clear idea of ​​how to achieve this. during a recent debate with kamela harris, he was asked if he had an economic plan for the country. to which he replied that he had a concept of a plan, that is, despite the attacks on kamalugar for not having an economic policy of his own, he essentially admitted that he did not have a concrete one. themselves are just concepts, the same applies to his approach to the russian invasion of ukraine, he has a concept of a plan and considers himself an experienced negotiator capable of finding a way to end the war, but it seems that he himself does not quite understand what he really wants, the word chaos is you here lived very appropriately. thank you very much, dear mr. ambassador, bright, for

this brilliant analysis on the air of the tv channel. i want to remind our tv viewers that now for them worked matthew bryza when... adviser to the secretary of state of the united states, ex-director of european and eurasian affairs at the us national security council. september discounts on lodyaniki bronchialik 20% in psarynyk, pam and oskad pharmacies. there are discounts on fervex in september. 20% in psarynyk, bam and oskad pharmacies. the book of women at war. a joint project of the espresso tv channel and the spirit and letter publishing house. the book is based on the reports of the presenter of the espresso tv channel khrystyna parubiy. 20 stories, 20 fates, 20 women who defended the country. the book is dedicated to women who chose the path of fighting the enemy in the ranks of the military. women at war, search in bookstores

of ukraine. with the support of the kostyantyn zhivago charitable foundation. september discounts on resis. table 10% in pharmacies plantain bam and ochad, in march there are discounts on son bam 10% in pharmacies plantain vam and ochad. vasyl zima's big broadcast. my name is vasyl zima, this is a big ether on the espresso tv channel. two hours of airtime, two hours of your time. my colleagues and i will talk about... most importantly, two hours to learn about the war, about the military, the front component, serhiy zgurets and what the world is like, yuriy fizer is already with me, and it's time to talk about what happened outside of ukraine, yuriy, good evening, two hours to keep up with economic news, time to talk about money during the war oleksandr morchyvka is a field of winter and sports news, i invite yevhen pastukhov to the conversation, two hours in the company of

favorite presenters. about cultural news, alena chekchenina, our tv viewer, is ready to tell, good evening, presenters who have become many. on the weather for this weekend, as well as distinguished guests of the studio, mustafa dzhemilov, the leader of the crimean tatar people, is in touch with us, mr. mustafa, i greet you, good day, events of the day in two hours, vasyl zima's big broadcast, a project for smart and caring people, espresso in the evening, every saturday political club helps to understand the processes, that are happening in ukraine and the world, want to understand how our today will affect our tomorrow, watch the saturday political club, every saturday on espresso. greetings, this is svoboda live on radio svoboda. we have already come to the snake itself. the following shots can help you shock. news from the scene. live drone attacks, kamikaze, political analytics.

objectively and meaningfully. there is no political season. exclusive interviews, reports from the hottest points of the front. freedom life - frankly and impartially. you draw your own conclusions. dmitriy areshkin, political scientist, professor of the free university in riga, will be on the air of the espresso tv channel. i welcome you, dear dmytro borisovych, to the espresso tv channel. good day, hello. well, we understand that our armed forces have demonstrated that escalation can be played in two hands, on two scores, we understand that a military depot has arrived in the tver region of the russian federation. the story is extremely serious, taking into account the fact that there was an explosion of such power that

an earthquake occurred, reaching three points on the richter scale, and accordingly we understand that... the war entered the territory of the russian federation not only in the form of coffins or bags of 200, so a new phase of the war is beginning, well, i would ask accordingly describe you, outline its parameters, how do you feel about it? i wouldn't say that everything is unequivocally with the transition of the war to some new quality, it seems to me that all this is predictable, just unexpected for the russian... century, the picture has changed somewhat, this was not noticed in moscow, it is about the fact that.. . a large territory must be protected if you are at war, and it turns out that russia has too many facilities for which there is simply not enough air defense, including

a very large and apparently modern production base, this is the tver province, which should be to protect, because there are missiles, and shells, and whatever, it didn’t work out, it flew in and exploded, which means that russia lacks modern air defense equipment to cover key points... i don’t see this as big news, because exactly everything happened, for example, in april and may of the 22nd year, when he did not expect an answer on the way to kyiv or gostomel, and he met and received this answer, and in kharkiv and so on, the same applies to kursk, therefore war has its own logic problem. in that the russian mentality it is very difficult to understand this modern logic. it is very simple: if this is the european logic and it was that when you live in a glass

house, you don't need to throw stones at your neighbors, it can fly back. and putin and his entourage thought that nothing would come in response, and secondly, the most headless of them believed that this is our house, glass or not, it is ours. the west will be scared and will not participate. ukraine from... zelensky will flee and in three days there will be a victory parade in kyiv. it didn't work out that way. and now already started a process that is difficult to stop. he is terrible, he is bloody, he is destroying ukraine. she is a victim of aggression. there are no questions here, but it destroys russia as well. the only question is that russian public opinion has not yet substantiated this, realized it and is not ready to realize it. and in this sense, ukraine deals with what it presents time and time again very clearly. simple lessons for russian public opinion. the question is how soon this public opinion will be able to gather the courage to admit that putin committed not only

a crime by starting this war, but also a mistake. and now you will have to pay for this mistake for a long time and in extremely unfavorable ways. but this is another conversation. in general, it seems to me that the war has gone mad. in the 21st century, in the modern world, wars do not solve problems. but putin remained in the 18th or 19th century, or in the first half of the 20th century , i don’t know if the spirit of nicholas ii or someone else or some other incarnated projections of stalin came into him, he thinks so, and here the key story is how much a cotton ball with ammonia can hollow it out, well here the question is about the amount of blood, the amount of destruction and from... respectively, in principle, the unshakable position of the west. we understand that in ukraine there is nowhere to flee under the threat of existential destruction. putin and the kremlin

offer only an ultimatum: give us your territory, give us your sovereignty, give us your identity, or the war will continue. that is, this is not a negotiating position, it is only an ultimatum under the threat of the destruction of the people, the state, and so on, that is. de facto putin does not offer anything, but perhaps just one or the other of these ammonia problems blood, i'm not afraid to say it, will he be able to change the option in his head a little, i don't know? if i understood you correctly, my answer will be as follows: the fact is that russia is two-layered, on the one hand, it is european, and on the other, let's say, the golden horde, at least ivan vasilievich the terrible deliberately used... the tactics of the golden horde territorial management , which he borrowed from safa gerei, managed the kazan khanate quite strictly three times. all the time there is opposition to

the european intention, where russia was such the empire itself, such as, for example, austria-hungary under the leadership of the rather europeanized romanov monarchic family, but since 1917, especially after comrade stalin came to power , conventional asians began to openly dominate. an idea of ​​the organization of power, a kind of sultanate, an eastern method of production, as karl marx wrote, saying that there is no private property, property belongs to the state, etc., and this is already an empire, rather not of the european type, but of the golden horde, when there is a khan, which is not limited by any political institutions which would be restrained, there is none, there is a military-political or a military-nomadic one. pseudo-democracy, which is called delegative, i.e. once delegated the powers of the khan and after that he is not limited by anything and in no way, here is comrade stalin.

built one, from whom does he protect the russians, from the people of bandera, who are the people of bandera? earlier , there were those who seized power in ukraine, but now it is all of ukraine. it turned out that the same russian people, which he proclaimed to be part of the great russian people, consists of traitors themselves, and this is purely stalinist approach, the people are traitors, and this is a purely horde approach, when khan could deprive the uluz of their subjectivity, resettle from one part of his own. turned upside down, starting from the fact that ukraine has no subjectivity, and the ukrainian people do not exist, and up to the point, in just over two years, that this nation should be destroyed because it does not obey us, even a logical external contradiction is covered up and covered, and you just need to understand putin, collective putin, let it be

impersonal. and that collective putin in the person of simonyan, solovyov, shuigu, medvedev, anyone, this system of values, which he is currently promoting and defending, does not correspond to reality, it is distorted, it contradicts the nature of the logic of the development of events. the natural logic is that ukrainians want to be in europe, so he could not overcome this natural desire for sovereignty by peaceful means, he could not buy yanukovych 17. ukraine did not agree to this and yanukovych was expelled, and he cannot forgive ukraine for this and is trying to prove , that he is such a figure by military method, and he also does not succeed and will not succeed. the question is which one terrible price for this natural experiment , the outcome is known in advance. well , what does known in advance mean? some understand,

some don't, me. this result seems to be a foregone conclusion. in any case, this is a deep depression, not to say, a disaster for russia. i am not talking about ukraine at all, because it is a victim of aggression. here it is clear that the loss of population, the destruction of the economy, was not initiated by ukraine, it was initiated by collective putin. answering your question, as i understood it correctly, putin is trying to resist with armed force the natural course of european history. putin will have the same story somewhere, it's just that russia is a very big country, has a lot of resources, so more blood will have to be shed, what can you say here, how to fight it, i can't imagine, but look, dmytro borisovich, well,

we understand that putin is not a power in himself, he has certain partners, trade, geopolitical, you know, china is already in full swing, and not only china, iran joins in here, but here the question is what exactly, for example, brazil and china are giving there certain signals regarding these or other peace proposals, and we understand that a large part of them are not public, they are probing the ground, first of all in the united states, maybe in brussels. maybe in london, so ukraine is simply surprised, any proposals that come from the same heaven or from brazil, so they boil down to the fact that it is called peace at the expense of ukraine. the capture of our territories is constantly discussed, so -called realities on the ground are discussed, although our fighters have demonstrated that the realities on the ground are not so unambiguous. armed forces of ukraine

are on the territory of kursk. provinces, but we also suspect that both beijing and brazil, and not only them, give certain signals with the agreement of the kremlin, that is, with the agreement of the kremlin, they give certain signals, broadcast them, and try to check what the reaction will be, and this is possible means that the kremlin is ready for something, but here it is a question of the psychotype of this russian milosevic. a political choice turned russia to the east, and now, according to his ideas about the beautiful, and his ideas are soviet, and therefore he is supernatural moscow, beijing, tehran, pyongyang are building a bloc, partly, perhaps, the capital of syria, damascus, this is a bloc that opposes the west, the problem is that putin is not a leader in this bloc.