the heads of the foreign ministries of the usa and great britain were received in kyiv, and the topic of long-range weapons is loudly heard everywhere. the republicans wrote a letter of appeal to the white house and finally we heard a statement from us president joe biden himself that the possibility of lifting restrictions on the use of long-range weapons in ukraine is being considered.

putin's positions, it is unnatural to set artificial restrictions on ukraine, their elimination is logical, will it change the entire course of the war, maybe not, but it will speed up the moment of its end. this war is in the sense of hot combat actions will end only when putin's position is undermined, they can be undermined precisely by an effective attack on targets in the russian federation. the defense secretary's discussion is also worth liking. personally, i really enjoyed this discussion between the minister of defense. from the usa by lloyd austin and experts of the institute for the study of war. austin said that allowing the use of american weapons to strike targets in the russian federation will not help ukraine win the war. and asv experts answered that austin is not telling the whole truth, and this possibility is still crucial. first of all, for the disorganization of the frontline. i think it

's even more important in terms of policy advocacy when it comes to putting pressure on putin. the issues are not only in the disorganization of life in the border areas. i would put a lot of emphasis on issues of information influence, the ability to hit strategic targets in different places in russia will play a huge role in the future. so it won't end the war because no single element can guarantee it, but it will definitely help. it is about subversion.

at the same time, opinions are increasingly heard that the war may last another 10 years, and russian propaganda notes the next term of vladimir putin's presidency. ok, and russian propaganda from 2030 to 2036, so when will the war in ukraine end, in the fall? i am sure that putin will not live to the 30s, this is the absurdity of russian propaganda, this war has already been going on for 10 years and may take some more time, of course there will not be a peace treaty in the near future, but now the cessation of hostilities is imminent.

one of the key states where it is played final result, it's pennsylvania. the state has 19 electoral college votes, so the result in pennsylvania is that whoever gets even one more vote immediately gets 19 votes that go into the entire electoral pool, which is a lot. there are many poles living in pennsylvania, there may even be several dozen.

many americans, voters of polish origin, in pennsylvania, according to her, there are almost 800 thousand of them, this is a lot. it is believed that in total there are approximately 11 million voters of polish origin in the united states, so it can be said that if polish and ukrainian american voters conspired, and there are a lot of them in pennsylvania, they could probably, in some theoretical version , influence the final decision of who will be the president of the united states. there is one more thing that haris did when she raised the polish question, it rarely comes up. in american elections, but has great importance on different levels. trump played on this when he said 8 years ago that poles bring him happiness. now haris suddenly took it from him. this is a very thoughtful move on her part. and what about the ukrainian map? what can we

say about the rhetoric of trump and harris regarding the russian war in ukraine? trump trump's behavior was strange. he was pressed several times, but he was never able to clearly state what he meant, other than to suggest that he would solve the problem of war immediately after his election, before his inauguration. what we are hearing means that he is rather planning to negotiate with putin on terms that would be very unfavorable for ukraine, poland, and all of central europe right now. without debate, what is her vision for the role of the us eastern european direction? i believe that garis is looking for his own way and this is an indirect continuation of biden's policy. in the future, this will only increase, and for us there may also be hidden potential problems,

but on the issue of the war itself and the principles of international law, garis takes a position that benefits our region. in particular , there was no hint of isolationism, only theses about the important role of the usa and american leadership. i noticed that harris was looking for america's involvement. i think garis' vision of how america's participation should look like now and in the future, it is only being formed, and the main thing is that the vice president does not recognize putin's territorial acquisitions, forceful changes to the borders, the revisionism of the head of the kremlin - this is fundamental for us from this point of view, she is more reliable and stable. haris talked a lot about supporting ukraine. in her statements , she mentioned the weapons transferred to ukraine to repel aggression. javelins, abrams tanks on... i can say with confidence that this

has not been in the american debate for a long time, we will probably see another episode pre-election debates, although there is not much time left, but surely there has never been such a great interest in the affairs of our region in american debates, and in this sense it is good. and how do you think all this is perceived by the american voters, who they are? i mean trump, who kept playing on biden's age, he thought it was witty and smart to make the sitting president look old. suddenly, in the background of garis, he himself becomes similar to an elderly man, that is, he suddenly dies from a weapon that he himself... playing with age in a public discussion is unpleasant

weapons, and this is always a problem, because he is 78 years old, he has to campaign every day. life on the campaign trail in the us means sitting on a plane and giving short general speeches several times a day. this is as difficult for trump as it has been recently for biden. and suddenly, what was supposed to strengthen him, that is, the attack on biden for his age, in the end becomes a great weakness of trump himself. the great work of abc news journalists, who conducted the debate and worked as fact-checkers, each time commenting on different topics for the audience, so as not to introduce them into delusion, especially regarding donald trump's statements on abortion, health care , and more. it was a good job, instead , kamala harris turned on the sense of humor and it looked just amazing.

i believe that the elections in the united states of america will decide what the world order will be for several decades to come.

are obliged to go to school, just as from september 1, ukrainian refugee children are polish children. it was discussed, analyzed, and now it is an established fact. it is known that until september it is out of the polish system education was

three years only remotely, among children, perhaps 1-2% are really able to perform all these duties, but we understand that, in general, this is a waste of educational opportunities and young years. it is also important that it was necessary to reach the moment when ukrainian children will simply enter the system normally, just like our children. i talked about it in detail in my position with the deputy minister of education yoanna

mucha and i saw that the government officials are super-prepared when it comes to training. professions and diplomas while they find shelter in poland with her children. thank you for this program, pavel koval, maria gurska, close to politics, close to the world. thank you very much.

in september, there are discounts on relief, 10% in pharmacies plantain to you and. september discounts on rezi stol 10% in pharmacies plantain bam and ochad. in the frantic flow of various events, it is sometimes difficult to determine what is most important. the country magazine will help to understand the essence of phenomena and processes. qualitative analytics and independent experts. with the country, in the center of the main events. september discounts on zipelor 20% in psyllium, bam and oshchad pharmacies. in in september, there are discounts on sudokrem, 15% in podorozhnyk, bam and oskad pharmacies. vasyl

zima's big broadcast. my name is vasyl zamatsi, this is a big ether on the espresso tv channel. two hours of airtime, two hours of your time. i and my colleagues will talk about the most important thing, for two hours, to learn about the war, about the military, front, component, serhii zgurets, and what the world is about. yuriy fizar is already with me, and it's time to talk about what happened outside of ukraine. yury, good evening. two hours to keep up with economic news. time to talk about money in wartime. oleksandr morchivka field with me, and sports news. i invite yevhen pastukhov to the conversation. two hours in the company of your favorite presenters. alena chekchenina, our art watcher, is ready to talk about cultural news. presenters, who for many have become as if they are already next to me, ready to talk about the weather for this weekend, as well as distinguished guests of the studio, mustafa dzhemilov, the leader of the crimean tatar people, in touch with us, mr. mustafa, greetings, good day, events of the day in two hours, vasyl zima's big broadcast, a project for intelligent and caring, in the evening for espresso.

we are servicemen of the griga separate unit, named after volodymyr griga, of the unmanned aviation complex platoon of the 76th separate battalion of the 102nd separate brigade. in the zaporozhye direction , combat clashes occur daily due to constant enemy assaults. this is not a vyminaypil direction, which our battalion has been defending for almost two years. right now we need three times as many modifiers and fire damage from the sky. therefore, we appeal to all concerned for fundraising for 20. yes, the amount is not small, but the lives of brothers and your relatives are much more expensive, we really hope for your support, support and distribution, let's not let the occupier take a step further and accelerate the victory together, glory to ukraine, glory to the heroes. friends, my greetings, today's

program we will completely devote to film propaganda, which is produced by russia right now, why westerns, as we call them, the western world, are made for it, they are made not only for one reason, it is a whole set of reasons, which the russians are very good at they know, and they skillfully use it, and we try to counteract everything somehow, but... here is the latest case, loud with the tape russians at war, turned out so far, unfortunately, not in our favor, but we continue the fight, and actually we let's also talk with kornii hrytsyuk with... a director who shoots a lot of different absolutely documentary films, in particular, he filmed a project of conversations with russian prisoners, there are simply

high masterpiece interviews that really need to be shown somewhere at various film festivals, so that the audience there after all, i understood what illusions she is in regarding the russian military, well, let's talk with korniy about the tape that is currently being shown in luxembourg and promised to others. to be shown in the world, her name is zzinema and she talks about how russia actually used some propagandistic elements in cinema, more precisely, how it used cinema to sow propaganda for its domestic audience, there are also many surprises, i think, waiting for such an audience, human enough as they say i always ask myself: how did the audience react to this tape, for example, how did they react, for example, to the description of the film "brother, brother-2", and to all the moments that take place there.

but now let us consider the situation in order, i will remind you about this tape in general, where it started. anastasia trofimova, now we can see her, is a director who positions herself as russian-canadian, and she filmed for world languages. but she also shot for rasha then, she shot quite a lot of films and visited the hostilities, and here she filmed a documentary called russians at war, and here she tells us that now we can also see excerpts from this film, and she tells us that she met a military man, a ukrainian, on the train, who is fighting on the side of the dpr, and he says, let's anastasia, come to us and film our war without... problems - says anastasia, and for seven months, and she is filming this war, there she is just very much the same, and she it sits there for seven months completely unnoticed by various special services and simply

communicates with the military and films them and then edits a tape from all this and sends it to the venice film festival, where it goes in the non-competitive program, by the way, together with our film, or with our two, or rather... tapes, and there she receives a lot positive reviews, we ukrainians, our ukrainian girls, producers, directors, who went to the venice film festival to present their films, by the way, shot without state funding, they watched this film, producer daria basel wrote feedback, and this started a disturbance in our country, this disturbance grew into a whole such wave, because diplomats got involved, and... diplomats in canada got involved, because then this, this film was to be shown at the also prestigious festival in toronto, and

our consul there, and khrystia friniand, the minister, they started to make some statements, but the film was initially canceled due to the protests of ukrainians, but then the screenings were resumed after, well, these were some special screenings, they were not planned, and so what.. . is special, so it is this is the hollywood reporter, one of the most prestigious american publications, in principle, and one of the most prestigious, which is devoted to cinema, and there is an article on with the position of the general director of this film festival in toronto, and his name is cameron bailey, and he starts to tell fears and horrors about how poor and unhappy they are. at this film festival they were afraid of ukrainian protests, because they were not just protests, they were aggressive protests, belli says, on the one hand he says: well, we can understand the feelings

ukrainians, what's up, but we were sent threats of violence and even sexual violence, and this already crosses all boundaries, but here she is, but he did not present any evidence of this sexual violence, by the way, which was threatened, they say, by ukrainian protesters. after all, in canada, various ukrainian filmmakers, in principle, people in social networks, have already begun to suggest that it is quite possible, someone, perhaps, wrote in some comments, like, what if it was you who felt how these russian soldiers were raping you there, maybe you they wouldn't be condescending to the heroes of this film, i mean, and maybe the canadian directors of this festival perceived it as a threat. sexual assault, well let's listen to mr. cameron. for the most part everything was civil and peaceful, but some of the threats were horrific.

tiv employees received hundreds of verbal insults in their letters and phone calls. our employees also received threats of violence, including sexual violence. it's terrifying, and our employees are understandably terrified. terribly scared, sir bailey also says that there were two additional screenings of this film, that there were terrible security measures, because... they were also afraid that the film crew would be attacked by ukrainian protesters and, i don't know, they would be killed sexual violence, obviously, and it should also be noted, unfortunately , that now we can possibly look at how ukrainian protesters are protesting there, but if we did not see all this, we can also state, unfortunately, that the canadian, american , and in general, the north american and world

press, why... why does it have such positive reviews about this russian tape, well, it is clearly propaganda, but one of the most fair arguments against our protests is that the majority of the protesters did not watch this tape , well, you and i haven’t watched it either, we just trust the point of view of our female cinematographers who saw it in venice at the venice film festival, and judging by the theses in this film, well, it’s... really propaganda, because the theses are just very standard, which ones exactly they use these theses for the western audience, what i mean is this whole situation, when it's not the people's fault, let's feel sorry for these soldiers, well, look at how ignorant they are, they're kind of weak, but they were forced to fight , they may not fully understand, these are also unfortunate people, and all the politicians are to blame, and so on, this whole song we know very well,

especially since anastasia trofimova... at the beginning of her film says that what the hell, i was so surprised when russia attacked ukraine in in the 22nd year, it was so unexpected, well, she absolutely does not say that russia attacked ukraine at all in 2014, and before that she attacked other countries, and this is not the first time, and if she spoke, then the reaction of the public would be slightly different, but less so, and also... we can talk about the fact that, well , let's just listen to one of the quotes, for example, from the publication global and mail, so what the author writes there, russians at war, a brave and exceptional documentary, unadorned, shows the horrors of war in...

including some of the most gruesome footage you'll ever see on the big screen. this documentary in no way glorifies russia, its military or its war effort. this film in no way demonizes ukraine or its people. that's it. well, we have to understand that this is the idea of ​​westerners about all these matters, we have to explain all this to them. because the russians understand, i don't get tired of repeating it, how and to which audience to act, and judging by this, this movie russians at war, it was made really sufficiently high-quality from an artistic point of view, and the director anastasia trofimova, she is quite an experienced person, she filmed a lot for world broadcasters, which, as i have already said, and therefore, and therefore we must understand that this is really implicit propaganda, more , many

people... whom we call naive, whom we can call leftists, whom we can call people who are not very pumped there, who live there somewhere in well-fed, civilized, prosperous countries, and have no idea what russia is, they they say no understand that this is propaganda and do not read these moments, and here, for example, i can quote here that in italian, this is how they thought about this film, here i am quoting, and... i am also quoting one of the journalists, here, for example, italian culture is humane and conflict-free, italians avoid confrontation despite all external emotionality, so it is the italian audience, with its traditional orosophilia, that is the ideal habitat for this kind of propaganda product. well, actually, if we talk about the future fate of this film, then it will be shown to many at various film festivals, for example, at the utsiu festival.