for those who care and think politklub every sunday at 20:00 at espresso. an unusual look at the news. good health, ladies and gentlemen, my name is mykola veresin. sharp presentation of facts and competent opinions. for example, if mykola veresin had done that, he would have gone to prison. a special look at the events in ukraine, so it goes without saying. that the fish rots from the head, no, not from the head, and beyond it, then who is china, me, my heart hurts, all this in the information marathon with mykola veresny, saturday 5:10 p.m., sunday 6:15 p.m. on espresso. get closer to victory, together with the central security service, the sbu, join one of the best special forces in the country. we are expanding and hiring. we invite civilian specialists. different directions. experienced

commanders will ensure your high-quality training and education. fill out the questionnaire and choose the direction where you can be most effective. we are waiting for you in the team of tssoa asbu. together we will write the history of victory. details on the official pages of the sbu. congratulations, in the last broadcast i already talked about the fact that russia is preparing for the un general assembly and has prepared all kinds of new threats, and in principle, the main one of these threats is the most terrible, as russian propaganda tries to present it, putin announced yesterday. told

about the changes in the russian nuclear doctrine, and because of this, well, literally yesterday and this morning, they already started showing their little boys, their panties on russian television, this news is directly related to the fact that it is not the first day and not the first week we are discussing here what we are responding to and what our arguments are this secret, in absentia? is ukraine worth a nuclear war? with such a question, president putin, speaking politely, shook western politicians and, first of all, shook washington, which continues the discussion on lifting the ban on long-range missile strikes against russia. the supreme commander announced.

by any non-nuclear state, but with the participation or support of a nuclear ally, would be considered a joint attack on russia. the basis for a nuclear response will now be considered a critical threat to sovereignty russia, not only with nuclear, but also with conventional weapons. in short, they left again. brown lines, again this is a threat to sovereignty, you know, about this threat to sovereignty, they basically talked about it all the time, and there is nothing new here, in fact, because all of putin's previous speeches were about this, if the threat to sovereignty, so here we are hey-hey, well, that’s why this is it, here we are, as they say, rewrote some document, er... i would

n’t say that there is nothing new, but that this is new only in the imagination of a hipist who thinks that if he showed someone a folder with something in it, a piece of paper, and look, i wrote something on this piece of paper, then everyone should immediately get excited, scared, something else, but this is the logic of a hebist, but not logic more than anyone else, so i somehow wrote, well, like, well, in addition, let me remind you, here are all the conversations about the fact that if the nuclear power that attacked there, the united states has already attacked russia, like this, you you've been telling this for 10 years, and now it's being told again, that is, somehow something is not fighting with each other here, what is called sclerosis in all of you, have you forgotten? in fact no proxy war. no,

in fact russia is considering the action of the united states using ukraine as a tool to attack russia for an attack. consider the united states as an attacking party, as an aggressor country, in my opinion, but this is the most serious and most relevant innovation in this doctrine, where the innovation, well, it’s the same, has been considered for 10 years, and what is being considered, well, but in the meantime, let's look at that, huh why did he say such a thing? what is he so strongly on, so the russian propagandists have forgotten, what does the kremlin rely on so much? aggression against russia by any non-nuclear power, but with the participation or support of a nuclear power,

is proposed to be considered as their joint attack on the russian federation. the condition of russia's transition to the use of nuclear weapons is also clearly fixed. we will consider such a possibility already upon receiving reliable information about the mass launch of air-space attack and crossing means by them of our state border, i mean strategic or tactical aircraft, cruise missiles, drones, hypersonic and other aircraft. we reserve the right to use nuclear weapons against us. against russia and belarus as a member of the allied state, including if the enemy, using conventional weapons, poses a critical threat to our sovereignty. in conclusion, i would like to note that all clarifications are thoroughly verified and proportionate to modern military threats and risks to

the russian federation. well, as you mentioned there, even a drone attack, just in case you had any doubts. that the raids of ukrainian uavs on warehouses and airfields on the territory of the russian federation were successful, then here is the answer, you see, they were very successful, because putin ran out and started muttering something about it, and again threatening him with a nuclear rod, we will strike , well, returning to those other stories that are new there, are there any new ones. the attack on russia and belarus, no, it is not new, let me remind you that how many years ago, they have been rebasing nuclear weapons in belarus for a year, this is already is happening, and then again, there are talks

that if someone attacks there, it is also not new, it was from the first day of the war, not only from the 22nd year, it was from the 14th year, so... in fact, there is nothing new, why is there such a cry again now, my god, again, because president zelenskyi has a meeting with biden there, everyone understands that ukraine can get some kind of weapon, and this is what causes hysteria, there is no other reason for this statements, well, apart from that, i will repeat again that the last raids on russian bases were very, very successful, that's why there was a statement, and a trip with... of course , zelensky. putin is going to escalate, and everyone understands that it is no coincidence that this message was announced on the eve of biden's meeting with zelensky. i hope that there in the white

house they will hear this warning not to cross the line that we have clearly drawn. well, you know, the hope that something like this will be heard in the... white house, why didn't they hear it there before, of course, it literally chokes all russian propagandists, the americans thought everything along with their satellites that they're playing and we've sent them a signal that god forbid they play, i'm honestly in such a high mood, that means that's it, the jokes are over, that's it. if someone did not understand something, then there is no one to explain to them? it seemed to them that they could joke with russia, that russia would not dare, that cultivation

from that side would not help the ukrainian nazis and their masters, that russia did not have the means. to defeat ukraine, russia desperately grabs an atomic bomb, and of course, again these, you know, wet dreams, like somewhere on ukraine to drop nuclear weapons. there are even more wet ones, of course, they dream, as always, that they will throw nuclear weapons somewhere in europe, something like that, but this is what we are releasing for now, although you know, this is the last test of sermat, it shows that if they try to throw something, then it will most likely fly to kursk, bilharad, voronezh, again, well, that's how it traditionally happens for some reason, that's why it's here , of course, if anyone needs to worry like that. especially strongly, then it is precisely to these cities, and not in ukraine at all, but joy, of course, from

this, the propagandists do not do less, and the dreams do not do less, i think, i think that a very important step has been taken today that will allow us, in the final case, i would say, to avoid a nuclear war. first, nuclear strikes on several large cities of ukraine, there is no alternative, kyiv will be handed out, and then, if nothing changes, then yes, there will be a transition to the stage of direct confrontation with western countries, which putin said in his first speech two weeks ago . and what was announced today is the final wording.

well, where can we go without some crazy dreams about satellites that lead somewhere, hit somewhere. of course, you can't do without it. the fate of madness must be. there is a danger that the united states has placed weapons on satellites after all. it can be of any type, up to and including tungsten pins. you just have to launch it in the right direction, then it gains hypersonic speed under the influence of gravity. and when it collides with the planet's surface, a lot of energy will be released. this is a serious weapon. and a tungsten pin fly by right into putin's head, how tempting such a prospect is, yes, we can't

live with such dreams. so, what do we have in the end, how do people react to it, and what do they think about it? well, they react to it in the same way as they reacted to all the previous ones, because i repeat once again, nothing new, all this has already been heard 100 million times, and the fact that somewhere in some wallet in russia there is something on... there is nothing critical changes, moreover, it is necessary to understand that some weapons are provided to ukraine, they are not provided, as a rule, this is not determined by these with all the rhetorical techniques that russia uses, and this is precisely the rhetorical technique, to write something else on some pieces of paper in russia that was not there, and the objective situation that the intelligence there is writing something there... the president of the united states and the european leaders, or they themselves

are there, taking into account their voters, and this is the main thing, in fact, always the argument, not the fact that putin went on the air, said that he would rewrite something, so nothing so special, i say again , it didn't happen, and finally the funniest thing about it they can all be completely incomprehensible to the united states, because, well, in the united states, well, in principle, they have ... it is written that this is how they can use their nuclear weapons, it was written a long time ago, and when the russians are now telling with such pomp how they finally wrote something like that, well, it's not that it's not serious, it's even funny in some places, you 're satisfied, our nuclear professor, i'll say this, in fact, there is nothing revolutionary in what happened yesterday, we did what made by the united states back in 1961 year i honestly don't understand their

complaints. they themselves always spoke with a smile at all meetings. you have a caveat attitude to nuclear weapons, and we have an extended deterrence. how many doctrines, how many concepts. well, now get your concepts in a mirror version. to be fair, there are still no official complaints from washington. if the west doesn't hear it, then no one else will, the west hasn't heard, let's admit it honestly, i didn't hear, i didn't hear enough that, well , you see, they're crying already, how come maybe they are there, maybe they haven't woken up yet, maybe because of this they didn't have time to write how they

are afraid of us, all these russian propagandists are whining now, but they haven't woken up for a long time. because the most interesting thing is that, in principle, they wrote all this nonsense in advance in order to have time for the meeting between zelensky and biden , and it was specifically said in the evening, not for the russians, which is typical, but because where there is evening in russia, there is morning in the united states , so that somehow in the morning directly this news in the united states, so that it was a little not the first. so that they would have time to find out exactly and to react, but the reaction turned out to be so sluggish that you see, skabieva was just so sad in her, sadness, oh my god, they didn’t hear, they didn’t hear, what should mama mia do, that’s what they heard, they actually heard, moreover , well, for example, the well-known minister of defense of germany, pistorius, managed to

react and even somehow, i would say, reacted very clearly. "i want to say what i said before, this is part of vladimir putin's toolkit. my role and our role is not to be a mouthpiece and a distributor of his threats. it is not even worth commenting on. tomorrow will be something else. we are sticking to our course, we are doing what we think is necessary to make it clear that nato stands by its position, and if he comes up with something else, let it spread through his channels, our channels." we will not give for this, so , that is , there will be no discussion of any of these threats, because they were treated as they were treated, that is, as for the next explosion of russian propaganda, and what, one can say, they wanted these threats in general, but are they really there now they will hit, well, skabiev is also interested in this, she is very

worried, and what to do if drones arrive, and here it turns out... that it is not known what to do, because they really hope that somehow such insecurity will probably frighten them, and if insecurity does not scares, well, i don't know, let the insecurities scare once again, that's how the answers to these questions sound, it's important, it's a question of interpretation, the president once again formulated an existential threat to the existence of the russian federation. while saying that when we see a swarm of drones, then this is already a danger, this is a danger, is the threat conventional, are we using a nuclear bomb, are we thinking, as you thought, we creatively used the american experience, we began to contain the unknown, in them it is called to contain the unknown, let

the enemy think that we , he does not know how we will perceive a swarm of drones as a nuclear attack. or as non-nuclear, that is, 147 drones attacked russia at the beginning of september, this is an excuse, and you guys in washington, think how we will perceive it, and think that we can perceive it as a nuclear attack, this it's called deterrence by the unknown, well, in fact, this deterrence by the unknown works in both directions, so let's see who will deter whom by the unknown, for example, such an unknown, and where will it fly again? a drone, it's unknown, it's true, suddenly it will fly somewhere so that i don't know, and it will be too late to stop it, everything happens, so it's not worth it, it's not worth playing in the unknown too much, because i repeat once again, it works in both directions, this unknown, well , you know, after all, it is clear that

drones are just a pain, whites, some kind of deep one that doesn’t... leaves and again that’s why we ask, after all, what to do with drones, 10 drones will fly, three missiles, four, there is no difference, we don’t say which number should fly in our direction, we say they are not flying in our direction, the assessment will of course be made by our supreme commander and what will be the response, but all this will happen. drones sleep at night, and they won't tell anything about it, they'll just pretend it didn't happen, well, as it has already happened in all other cases,

this is how it will all be, so this is, you know, brandishing and inciting, it is of course aimed at somehow appeasing this, you know, russian globinarian, who sits in his own in such those infamous panties in front of the tv and shouting come on... let's nuke ukraine, kiev, somewhere else, where is our president, where is our great putin, why did he do it again without a nuke, without a stick, let him wave a nuke, well here we give an answer to this, so we rewrote it doctrine, you know, it’s nuclear escalation, it’s all very serious, and there’s such depth, yes, it’s serious, and that’s it, this is basically the end of this circus, because what’s next is just flying again, silently...flying, silently , somewhere around this story will continue. i repeat once again, the real situation with the provision of weapons is minimally affected, in fact, because it is affected by

completely different intelligence and the presence of the weapons themselves, which is not surprising, and the presence of political will that does not depend on the cries of the russian propaganda by no means, but you know, there is one more point, of course. it is scary, but there is a weapon that is even scarier, i will say even more, drones are not scary, drone fragments, after claps, drones, then there are fragments, with fragments it is scary, the two most frightening words, clap and fragments, a fragment of a drone, absolutely correct. and you know, in this russian doctrine, there is not a single word about fragments in it, just none,

what to do, we will work with fragments, as always, we will maintain our tradition, work in russia with fragments and that's it the output is excellent, and once the wreckage arrived, what are the questions? i don't think there are any, well, if you go by the documents, as they like to do, we signed the documents here, there are no fragments of such documents in the documents and there won't be, well, so we will work with fragments, so let's finish with these cries for now , and there is another topic that i will not develop very much, it is trump's statements that ukraine is once again interfering in the elections in the united states. it must be remembered that the cries are not new for trump. that's right, trump in 2016 he shouted that poroshenko was interfering in the elections in the united states, now he

is shouting that zelensky is interfering in the elections in the united states, and here, i would say, the problem is more with the trap than with us. of course, this is very bad for us, in the sense that any scandal is very bad for us, we depend on the help of the united states, we... depend on their public opinion and we always have to be, to put it mildly, careful in what we're doing about the united states, but there are times when, you know, it's very difficult to fix something very much, so that trump took as the basis of his election program that he has to force ukraine to capitulate to russia, he sees her... as putin's main partner. and, unfortunately, we will not change it. trump, when he comes to power, will be a problem for us in any

case. if he becomes president, most likely we will have to think, and we have to think now, how to fight without american support. is this possible? yes, it is possible, actually. can this be avoided? yes, if trump doesn't become president? that's the only option. and while all this is happening, these are all cries, well, we need to treat them more calmly, i think, consider that the election campaign is going on, so hysterical in the united states, so they are trying to use the ukrainian theme ukraine in this election campaign, can we do something strong about it? in fact, no, and in fact it is also necessary to understand that the biggest part of this story is russian propaganda, for which trump is also very profitable. and all this hype is very profitable, i will say more, most likely, it is precisely to make all the conversations about ukraine the main topic election campaign, it's time.

biden and kamala got us into a war in ukraine and now they can't get us out of it, i watched him, we will win, we will win, he has been repeating this for three years now, every time zelensky comes to the us, he leaves with hundreds of billions of dollars , i think he's the greatest trader in the world, but we're going to be stuck in this war until i'm president and i'm going to deal with it, i'm going to negotiate, i'm going to find a way out, we've got to go.

biden says we're not leaving until we win, what if they win, this what they do, they fight wars, but we gave them almost $300 billion and you know what europe gave them, they're the same size as us, if you put all the countries together, their economies are very close to our size, and they only gave a small fraction of that number, a very small, very small fraction, well, it's not exactly accurate, to be honest, it's not accurate at all. trump goes on with his usual slogans, the opposite side screams, he keeps lying, that's all they can say, and unfortunately it's true, trump lies a lot, but we don't love him for that, and we didn't vote for him for that, it's believed that we elected him last time, it's great, trump lies, but he speaks so intelligently, and in general, we him... what

can be said about the conclusion from this, in fact, trump took this, you know, as an electoral technology, he took as an electoral technology that we will stop aid to ukraine, i promise you this, because it seems that it is beneficial for america, and here there is only one way to do it answer: if trump loses, he will lose precisely because he talked... about the fact that it is necessary to stop the aid to ukraine and to be friends with russia, this will be the answer to this whole story. if he wins, it means that the voters of the united states have supported the fact that putin is supported, that's it, everything is very simple, yes, this is the reality, this is real politics, and

the republican party's point of view will only change to help us. in case trump loses, because it will show that his slogans about not needing to help ukraine are deeply wrong, and american voters do not support i will say more, if trump loses, then the democratic party will help us much more, because it will see that the help to ukraine is rewarded, it gives additional electoral votes, and again this is the reality, and only elections in the united states will show what the real position of the american people is now, we depend on it primarily not on politicians, not on trump, not even on the democrats, we depend on the position of the american people, and it is precisely this position that we need in every way, well somehow support, we need to work more directly with the american people, everyone who can, who

can talk to... americans, who can offer something interesting to the americans, we should pay attention to that, but for now, sorry, not to all these statements, that trump and his company are doing, which, again, i repeat, believe that this is such an election technology. so , see you later. every week, maria gurska meets with the head of the committee on foreign affairs of the polish sejm, pawel kowal, the representative of the polish government for the restoration of ukraine. as always we we are talking about the most important things that happened this week in poland, ukraine, europe. what is being said about ukraine in the eu, how should we perceive the statements of european politicians and what will our accession to the eu look like. in the project "close to politics , close to the world" with maria gurska. every sunday at 3:30 p.m. with a repeat at 10:00 p.m. in collaboration with

au sisters. an unusual look at the news to.