putin's regime must be defeated, they talk about a plan for victory, about the fact that ukraine must win, but they don't say which one under what conditions? it seems to me that the main condition of the plan for the victory of ukraine should be a plan for the defeat of putin and putin's russia, unfortunately there is no such thing. well, i don't know if zelensky talked about it with kamala harry, the candidate for the presidency of the united states of america from the democratic party, but after meeting with the president of ukraine, she... said that she agrees with how ukraine sees the end of the war. let's hear what the vice president said united states of america, kamala harris. no one will be able to end this war without the participation of ukraine, but some in our country want ukraine to give up a large part of its sovereign territory. who demands that ukraine agree to neutrality and renounce its security ties. with

other countries, these proposals are similar to putin's demands, but let's be clear that these are not peace proposals, they are surrender proposals, they are dangerous and unacceptable, that is, the surrender proposal, mr. yevgeny, is unacceptable, but also the proposal of the complete defeat of russia in this war is also, as i understand it, unacceptable, including for kamala garis, i understood correctly. donald trump said today that this is not a scenario of surrender, that is, he is forced to discuss with his opponent, it is a shame that this is happening against the background of the visit of volodymyr zelenskyi, that is, his idea of ​​​​a peace plan that was supposed to become a sensation, we understand with you that it is should be the number one event, true, but, well, in fact, we do not see such a sharp one.

discussion in the western press, i say that maybe we will see it literally over the weekend, that is, literally tomorrow or the day after tomorrow, but i have not heard from serious western politicians that they are in favor of dismantling russia, until the idea of ​​​​dismantling russia is heard, it is all an imitation, because the end of the war at the moment, and obviously, if they will seek to end the war in a short period of time, then from... the current ones in the current, so to speak, the current line of contact, that is, there is a korean scenario or any other scenario, as we will say, this is for ukraine, so respite, but respite for russia, and it will use it in order to get as many new technologies, new equipment, get new resources, sell something to the west, except, for example, rosatom... which made a profit of

25 billion dollars last year, it became object of sanctions from the west? no, the question arises, why and what, what other moments, and this is not obviously not an isolated case, right? and we in this sense, as we, well, before that, i think that it would be beneficial for us to communicate with the american'. companies, although under the pretext that we will have a rather difficult winter is expected, and we have to look for additional opportunities and additional arguments to get through it and work accordingly. today, mr. yevgeny, volodymyr zelenskyi met with donald trump before the start of the meeting, zelenskyi expressed hope that his interlocutor also believes that the war in ukraine should be... stopped and putin

cannot win, and trump said that he will try to work, as he said, with both sides to settle the conflict. let's listen to what trump and zelensky said. in we have a very good relationship, and i also have a very good relationship, as you know, with president putin, and i think that if i win, we will resolve this very quickly. i hope we have a better relationship with... but you know it takes two to tango, we're going to have a good meeting today, i think the fact that we got together today is a very good sign, well, mr. yevgeny, trump says that he has a good relationship with zelenskyi and with putin, and zelenskyi tells him, after all, i hope that we will be better from now on relationship, he says about tango, and tango is for two, that is, somehow it does not connect at all. he

wants to cooperate with the two, he talks about the tango for two, what is actually happening now in trump's election campaign, why are these swings that we see, swings, why... why are they happening on the part of the republican party, he does not want to meet with zelensky , there is no time, then he meets, then he says again those mantras that everyone has already heard that when he wins, he will end this war, because he knows very well putin and zelensky, let's give credit to volodymyr zelensky, who did not get lost in this situation and skillfully supported the topic that you and i will be better. relations, but the situation here is that i think that trump is obviously not satisfied with the course of the campaign, because two days ago he talked about the fact that ukraine no longer exists, and now he agrees to visit it, and they say that it is a beautiful country, we, well, that is, he has what,

different chips with information are inserted somewhere, that is, he says one thing today, tomorrow the second, the day after tomorrow the third, in principle. for trump, this is typical, and it is obvious that his voters are satisfied with this, but for us this approach, well, that is, trump shows everyone what a good president he would be, but if he was a good president for a term in the 20th year, if he was elected, then he would not be able to run for office now, because he would have been president for two terms in a row. so actually. this argument is irrational, clearly the idea of ​​being in such an acute situation, it, well, i don't think it was properly thought out, and in fact, i believe that ukraine

found myself in a rather difficult situation due to such an adventurous approach, but in any case, we need to act further, and we must, i believe fully. substantive content, but now it should not be presidential diplomacy, zelenskyi will obviously not go, but it should be parliamentary diplomacy, veteran diplomacy, diplomacy, well, if you want religious organizations, so that we continue this signal that volodymyr zelenskyi brought that we need peace on our ukrainian terms, and i don't think there is a peace plan there are... politicians who will refuse to speak responsibly about the fact that we need a victory over russia, otherwise it is simply not a ukrainian politician, and of course, mr. yevgeny, this is the very end of our conversation, i

will ask your opinion about what wrote the british edition of the economist, i think you read about the predictions of next year's presidential... elections, there are, however, unnamed sources referred to by british journalists, who write that the headquarters seem to be deployed, work is underway, and everyone is getting ready there to elections, whether they will be held or not, that this is another insinuation, or, according to your data, there are preparations for the presidential elections in 2025, i had to answer your question today. i suggested predicting the following situation: imagine that elections are announced and, in accordance with the law , a few dozen candidates are nominated, who make deposits, who begin

to criticize the ukrainian state in different voices and say whether we need peace, well, that is, they will destabilize the situation within the limits of the law . as, how will we oppose this, how will the state of ukraine oppose this? that is, i do not rule out that there is a demand from western partners, and there are hints from western partners that elections are needed. it is difficult to call me a supporter of the political talent of volodymyr zelenskyi, but i understand that for us at the moment victory is more important, and elections in conditions of war, in conditions of war, presidential elections... these are the elections of the supreme commander-in-chief, well, in essence, because these are his powers , and as we predict it for ourselves, it is beneficial for russia to discredit any potential commander-in-chief, beyond all doubt.

thank you, mr. yevhen, thank you for the conversation, this was yevhen magda, executive director of the institute of world politics. friends, we continue to work live on the espresso tv channel, and... also on our youtube and facebook platforms, for those who are currently on these platforms, subscribe to our pages, like this video, and also participate in our voting today we ask you about... such as: will they continue the united states of america will help ukraine if trump wins. what do you think about this? everything is quite simple on youtube, yes, no, two options, if you have a separate opinion, please leave it in the comments below this video. if you watch us on tv, take your smart phone or phone and vote for the numbers. if you believe that if trump wins, the united states of america will continue to help ukraine (0800-211-381). and 0800 211 382, ​​all calls to these numbers are free, vote

at the end of the program, we will summarize this vote. next, we will be in touch with valery romanenko, aviation expert, leading researcher of the state aviation museum. mr. valery, i congratulate you, thank you for joining our broadcast. good evening, thank you for the invitation. we, mr. valery, have been watching the russians strike with daggers for the past two days. according to starokostiantynov and we see that the enemy is obviously aiming at or at the military airfield or at the planes stationed at that airfield, if they are stationed there, of course, on thursday, september 26, russian propaganda invented a fake that we allegedly lost four f-16 fighters, russian sources published information about this without any confirmation. and apparently it happened after an unexpected missile strike. the center for combating

disinformation denied the information of russian propagandists about the destruction of the f-16. the information is not true. such messages are another fake aimed at manipulating public opinion. this is a fiction created to reinforce the narrative of the inefficiency of western aircraft. russian propaganda started fakes about the downing of the f-16 spread even before the appearance of guilt. in ukraine, why, mr. valery, is the so far small fleet of f-16s bothering the enemy so much. well, they understand that this is a prospect, if we get f16, if they are given long-range missiles, well , at least, well, let's say 120 km, yes, although, i would like these amram missiles, s-8 models with a range of 160 km, then we will be able to destroy the russian ones. kab carriers, what is the destruction of russian kab carriers, or at least

to jeopardize these kab attacks, yes, for the russians to reduce their number, this means the complete emasculation of the russian offensive potential, because with only meat assaults they would not advance even 100 m, but when they destroy our strong points and after that start meat storms, then they have... some moderate, very slow there are successes in this regard, because indeed a country that has aviation and is fighting against a country that actually cannot use its aviation has significant advantages, because aviation is in modern warfare, it is not just a formidable force, it is also starting from the second, well, let's say, from the middle of the second world war, domination... the wind always provided an advantage, well, victory to the attacking side, but now the war

has changed a little, anti-aircraft missile systems have significantly reduced the advantages of tactical aviation, but still we see russian tactics: a strike with kabami, after that m "a clear assault and some kind of advance, there are tens, hundreds of meters, but the advance, you have already mentioned these. cruise bombs, as i understand it, which can be used on the ach-16 fighter, in a new aid package, the united states of america is giving ukraine jsou cruise bombs, and they can hit targets at a distance of up to 110 km, and, according to western experts, that they can be put on the f16 fighter, as you think, and when f these jsou. can be applied, taking into account these constant threats coming from the russian side, which

say that if the missiles of the allies, our allies will enter or enter the territory of the same kurtshchyna or the belgorod region, or soon these bombs will reach us, and i wonder how they will change the course of the russian-ukrainian war, no way, the matter is because... the glider bombs fly at, as you say, well, there is a long distance of more than 100 km, in general, the bombs are agm 154 bombs, yes. that means those bombs, they fly 130 km, they are winged bombs, let's start with that, yes, winged bombs, but they fly 130 km only when they are dropped from a high altitude. the russians drop their cabs from heights of 12 or more than 100 m. we cannot climb to such a height in front of the front line, because our planes will be

shot down. if these bombs are dropped from low altitudes, even at high speed, even if the slaves... do scraping drop them behind the upper point, they fly from 22 to 25 km, in no way these bombs, besides, we are promised to hand over bombs with cluster only combat units, they will not affect the course of hostilities to a large extent, although these are the most modern bombs, ah , they can be both with cassette and with concrete combat, ordinary. warheads and cluster bombs can be, well, they have enough effective sub-munitions, there are 145 ammunition in a cluster bomb of this type, and they are of double -cumulative-cumulative-fragment action, double-action, that is, they can not only to destroy armored vehicles, but also to destroy

the infantry in some area, but all the same, these bombs are in the form that we will receive from... they are for us, first of all, it will be difficult for us to use them, i say again, low altitude, short range , the high density of anti-aircraft missile systems of the russians, yes, but there is an option, there was an interesting option, let’s say, the editor-in-chief of defense express said that these engines can be put on, oh, you can put rocket engines on these bombs, but in general it is very valid idea, it... would be possible to do it in the conditions of ukraine, because in general these bombs are what should be delivered to us, yes, they were planned to be missiles, yes, but we will only receive them in the version of cruise bombs, glide bombs, yes, but in the tail part of these missiles they are called agm, anti surface guided missile,

guided missile, well, if in the tail part, where there is a place for this to install a jet engine. small ones, yes, then such a rocket is capable, such a bomb is capable, well , you see, now it is used to fly using a jet engine, then the range even from low altitudes will reach hundreds of kilometers, and then some, some impact on russian, let's say, weapons depots of the army divisional level, then it will be possible to destroy them, and this will have a direct effect. on the course of hostilities in certain areas, well, it is clear that we will monitor what kind of products will come to ukraine and how they will be used. another message that was voiced by joseph biden, well, actually during the visit, the american visit of zelensky, more precisely, biden instructed

the ministry of defense of the united states of america to expand the training of ukrainian... f-16 pilots, including by supporting the training 18 more pilots next year, why is that how they are about the f-16 and about the planes and about the pilots, how they cut it like salami, the principle of salami, bit by bit, bit by bit, you don't need many pilots, because you wo n't have them so quickly planes, and these pilots, well, this is an artificial product for the armed forces, for the air force of the armed forces, why do you think the americans are holding back this process, although they could train a hundred ukrainian pilots, or fifty ukrainian pilots, who would already make up this combat unit, which could be used on f16 fighters, well, you are wide-eyed, then i have to tell you, a hundred pilots are incapable,

even the united states is not capable of training hundreds of pilots, it has to be trained... firstly , in the european training center in romania, and in the united states, and conduct preliminary training, in addition, come on let's take the following aspect: an hour of flight, an f-16 plane, it costs somewhere, well, the planes are not new, spare parts are needed, 25-30 thousand dollars, one hour, in order to teach the pilot piloting and combat... use of this plane, it takes dozens of hours, yes, only, only cost, let's take only the cost of the plane, plus there, well, in general, to talk about it for a long time, the cost of training a pilot costs millions of dollars, it costs 2-3 million dollars, well, let's say that if

we take the total cost, slovakia, for example, bought 14 planes, it seems, on average, if the plane is delivered from the factory to some country, the cost of such an f16 plane is about 60 million dollars. and the cost of a set of aircraft, weapons, a spare engine for some spare parts, some weapons, and the training of pilots, it is already doubling, there are more than 130 million dollars, that is, after all, within 10 years, maybe we will have 100 pilots or 100, not even within 10 years, i think, you understand, canada is now involved in the training of pilots, it is in ... money is starting to work and train ukrainian pilots, the european

f-16 flight crew training center, which i mentioned in romania, but the americans say, although it is possible that the americans are financing the training of the european center, you understand, here you need to put points on and and figure out if three centers... train pilots, yes, that’s one thing, if one center trains and is financed by the united states together with canada, then it’s a different situation, that is, i haven’t put a full stop to this issue yet, but training is underway, and besides it must be borne in mind that our infrastructure is also not capable of receiving fifty planes at 16. thank you, mr. valery, for. the conversation was aviation expert valery romanenko, a leading researcher of the state aviation museum. friends, we continue our broadcast, and we work, let me remind you, live

tv channel, as well as on our youtube and facebook platforms, for those who are watching us live there now. please subscribe to our pages, like this video, and also take part in our survey. today we ask you whether the united states of america will continue to help. if trump wins, yes, no, it's pretty simple on youtube, yes option, no option, if you have a different opinion, please leave it in the comments below this video, if you're watching us on tv, grab it smartphone or phone and vote on the numbers if you think that if they win, the americans will continue to help ukraine, 0.800-211-381, no, 0800-211-382, all calls. these numbers are free, vote, at the end of the program we will sum up the results of this vote. next, we will be in touch with serhii krivonos, major general of the reserves, former first

deputy commander of the sso, ex-deputy secretary of the national security council. mr. general, i congratulate you and wish you good health, thank you for being with us today. good evening everyone, glory ukraine. glory to the heroes. mr. general, president putin, self-proclaimed president putin. and the soviet union from russia have updated russia's nuclear doctrine and expanded the list of applications, the possibility of using nuclear weapons, what are the challenges now facing ukraine and the world, and how will this new horror, which putin and his minions made public , affect the course of the russian-ukrainian war, well scared the information space of the russians has long been in practice and they like to directly talk about their powerful nuclear capabilities, but that's all

it's like trying to cut a piece of bread with a dull sword, so let's ignore their barking, rather deal directly with our own problems, of which we have more than enough, just as i'm sorry, when this survey concerning... trump, whether trump will help or not, we do not have enough of our own problems that we have to discuss and make decisions, we again distract ourselves from others, forgetting about our own problems, in solving public problems within ukrainian society, here is the number one task, without any doubt, just the current survey, it is timed to the visit of zelensky and the meeting with trump, so we are simply interested in what our tv viewers think. let's return to internal issues, to the internal situation in ukraine and the situation at the front. the situation in the pokrovsky direction is quite difficult, the course operation of the armed forces of ukraine is ongoing. how do you assess... the current

situation at the front as of september 27, 2024? situation, well, let's start from the top, let's start from kursk, from the north, in the direction of kursk the battles are going on at the tactical level, talking with certain guys at the level of commanders, i understand that the situation is not so dire, they fight back, they attack, they capture prisoners. in certain areas, in certain areas, uh, not like that, positively for us, but in the meantime, tactical- level battles are taking place, because the russians are still trying to find out where to bite and how to bite. as for the kupyan direction, this is still an ancient dream, to directly hold the kharkiv direction for the russians, and yet capture kupyansk, because by capturing kupyansk

under control, in the future they... plan to take the lyman direction and build the kupensk estuary, the time of yar konstantinovka, which they have also dreamed of for a long time and pokrovsk, this is exactly the reconstruction of such a wonderful rail road, which will allow the russians it is quite successful to transfer both human and material resources along their front line, which they believe will remain on the territory of ukraine for a long time, therefore... they make maximum efforts and in the first turn now on kurakhova and pokrovsky, so that in the future, if someone opens the map, they will see that from pokrovsk, it is a direct route to pavlograd, then to the dnipro, and skurakhova is a direct road going towards zaporizhzhia, they are repeating exactly the maneuvers of winter 43 -th year, when the red army tried to oust.

the german troops are precisely also from these directions, so there is nothing new, and they do not invent, they always repeat those operations, but add certain modern nuances to them, which concerns the situation at the front in general, well, the question is that when there are not enough people, as far as reserves are concerned, when people are not trained enough, it is too difficult to fight, and if at one time the leader of... our country had listened to commander-in-chief zaluzhnyi, and in october of last year, after all, the question the draft was raised and these people were drafted, then during this time it was possible to prepare them in sufficient quality and in the required quantity. at that moment, they did not see the need, but how can a person without any military education, who has never served a day in the army, to draw such conclusions, well, the environment that surrounds our president is real, unfortunately... unfortunately

, he does not say what is necessary, not what is realistic, but what the president wants to hear, and this is our biggest problem, that instead of the truth we are trying to soak ourselves and our own people directly in a warm bath, the time of enlightenment and the time of disappointment has already come, and it is precisely the ability to clearly place accents and ask uncomfortable questions, why someone does not fulfill certain duties, respectively, as prescribed and the constitution, other laws... this is the task number one, because if we continue to lull ourselves into warming, we can cook much more, cook well, for some reason it is not organized at the state level. as for money, money is primarily the economy, the economy, according to the law on mobilization, mobilization training must be transferred to functioning in wartime conditions, which means that we have