and they have already forgotten about him, as you rightly say, we still remember him, he is almost absent in the information space. zelenskyi returned from the united states, he talked with biden there, he talked with harris, he talked with trump, everyone talked with him, and this is true, this is reality, he met with the current president with the candidates for the position of the president of the united states, which was supposed to be the political content of this of this visit, not a plan to win. all this happened exactly what was supposed to happen, because the plan was 40 days before presidential elections of the united states. none will work, none, but now there will be other important events, ramstein, the summit of the four, yes, the peace summit, for example, yes, now you can prepare the peace summit, and say, there will be a second peace summit, there, remember, they wanted it to be held before the presidential elections in the united states, it was also seriously discussed that it should be held before the presidential elections in the united states. i

can't understand either, but why, and for what, and what's the point? but they talked about it seriously, absolutely, well, here is the answer for you question, so there will be a new information plan, and if we live in this world of information activities of the office of the president of ukraine, and our main idea will not be how to survive during a long-term endless war, but how to convince people , to convince people every time that... it is about to end, then this basically means that we are talking to people as if we were small children, who do not need to plan anything for the future, who just have to live with in a fairy tale, and this fairy tale is the main thing, so that it does not end, the main thing is not to lead to a situation when they suddenly find out that for this saint nicholas does not exist, you can imagine, but there is no need to bring them to such disappointment. st. nicholas is here,

he will bring gifts, the war will end in a month, if it ended in november, then it will end in january. well, remember that in 2022, during his address, it seems to me, to the citizens of the first on the night of december 31 of the 22nd year, on january 1 of the 23rd year, he said: "well, in the 23rd year, as in the 22nd it can't be anymore". i couldn't understand why he says this, what does it mean he can't? the 23rd year can be worse than the 22nd, and the 24th worse than the 23rd, this is a war, a multi-year war, in some new year it can be worse than the previous one, why should people be set up for this, even on new year's eve, but sometimes it seems to me, you know, that the president himself believes in this, that we are talking about some information measures, and the problem may be in the reality in which the president himself is, that it is easier for him to be in this reality. what if he alone

will give himself an account of where he really ended up as a result of his actions, as a person, i don't even have, as a head of state, but as a person as a result of the fact that he decided to change his career from acting to political, it will be much more difficult for him perform his duties, because he will constantly ask himself the question: well, how did this happen to me, why, i should have understood it, and it seems to me that the president should be in such a form that well, as much as he can, as much as he is... able from the point of view of efficiency, that he protected the state the interests of ukraine, because once again you and i do not have any opportunities to elect a new government, so for as many years as the war will continue, there is an option that this government, even in an unsaved form, because it is against any government of national unity , will exist and that zelensky will have to fulfill his duties as head of state, well, maybe for another 5-7 years, i don't know, again, i won't say that the war will continue for 5-7 years, but it may be so, we again we have to tell people that there are no political prerequisites for the end of this war. if

military-technical problems arise, then we need to do a lot to stop russia, overcome infrastructure problems, create a situation in which russia will not be able to economically continue the war, we from the west have to create this, and this is not a single year, as you understand , and not just one day for sure, so this power must be effective, if we can't, we believe that resettling into the world of reality, it hits the psyche. not only citizens as such, but also the president himself of ukraine, well, what is he like, i would say, a bright model of an average ukrainian, well, maybe that's why people voted for him, that he is like them, and not like these politicians, whom they did not want to see on the whole state, then maybe you and i would also be more comfortable not to tear the world president out of his own illusions, it's just a question, i don't know, i don't have an answer to this question, actually i'm wondering too. why do we

constantly find some excuses, at least to talk about what, in principle, in theory does not exist, cannot exist, or what will not exist in theory. but alas, you see, we are talking about it. by the way, another topic that we never discussed in the security block, but which directly concerns and in particular these visits to the united states of america, is the possibility of hitting the enemy's territory deep with long-range missiles, or any missiles, there 300, 400, 500 km doesn't matter, but hit the enemy's territory, his infrastructure. objects, on its logistical objects, on military objects, that is, on everything that should stop the russians on the battlefield. two weeks at least this information process lasted, again red tape, for two weeks, we expected that

there would be such a permission, but we did not receive this permission even after zelensky's visit, at least officially, and at least we still have no such applications... examples of such applications , after all, why in this case is biden hesitating, biden is hesitating, the biden administration is hesitating, and accordingly the united states of america is hesitating to provide such an opportunity to ukraine, even now, is it possible that biden is waiting for the presidential elections to pass elections, i also have such a theory... it appeared that maybe he does not want to do it until the conditional x day in order not to give, for example, trump himself some trump cards in his hands, yes, information trump cards, such t can also be an opinion, whether it is possible that these things will be transferred

with such baggage to the new administration, conditionally speaking, in your opinion, we have been discussing it for so many days. and there is still no definitive answer why we did not receive permission to strike on the territory of russia, which should have, at least partially, stopped the enemy's offensive, which we they talked with you as well. well, first of all, i really agree with you completely that if i were in biden's place, i would not make any sharp decisions, on those issues that are part of the election campaign, if trump during the election. campaign says that if they give permission to ukraine to attack russian territory with our missiles, then they will create the conditions for the third world war, and i will save you from the third world war, then you should definitely not make any decisions that will lead to the benefit of this statement, and by the way, i think that when vladimir putin changes the nuclear

doctrine, he is also playing in the american elections, that is, he actually confirms trump's words with his actions, so at least until november 5, you absolutely. need to be obtained not only from permits, but also from any actions in this direction. secondly, i am inclined to the opinion that there will be no public permission for ukraine to bombard the territory of russia with western missiles at all, but russia's allies do not give russia any permission, we just find debris there iranian shaheds or north korean missiles, but no one in tehran comes forward and says: we allowed them to hit ukraine with our shaheds, on the contrary. the president of iran says that we have never supplied anything, and we even condemn russia's aggression against ukraine, as masoud petochkian said now, at the session of the un general assembly, let's talk. and why then should ukraine's western allies make public statements. that is, such

a situation can be, and i think that it continues to be discussed. i don't think what if this question would not be considered, then the state'. secretary antony blinken and british foreign secretary david lemin would not have come to kyiv, there would not have been this lengthy meeting between starmer and biden, ultimately there would not have been this dinner between starmer and trump. such issues are usually discussed during such meetings. this is an absolutely obvious thing to me, but in any case, i assume that the final decision, if there is any, will be at the ... this summit level of the leaders, it can again be there four in germany and during ramstein to discuss whether this latest escapade of putin will not affect the adoption of this decision? yes, i'll tell you honestly, can it affect?

maybe, as far as i don't know, whether the number of missiles at our disposal will affect this decision at all, that's also a very good question, what kind of arsenic. we can now operate and the amount we have, even if it will be applied on the territory of the russian federation, will change the military-technical course of the war, that is, if... to formulate this formula correctly, andriy, how political risks are worth the military-technical effect, if not worth, then maybe not necessary, western leaders will tell you, they can proceed from this complex of issues, which is undoubtedly the subject of their constant discussions when they meet between themselves, but the fact that they do not leave this issue is also obvious to me, well, in particular, the new york times on friday, that is, yesterday, i found, i just found specifically, wrote

an article about the fact that the intelligence of the united states of america stated the risks due to possible strikes of ukraine on the territory of russia, this is about the fact that mr. vitaly just said that they will also be calculated, and whether it should be done or not from the point of view of some certain expediency. the number of missiles there, the possibility of hitting targets with these missiles, why does the us intelligence supposedly think so, because russia has already moved some part of its aviation there, some of its warehouses or something else, already to a more distant territory, accordingly, they believe that in fact the potential risk, it greater than the potential. there is at least one benefit information, here, here you can actually

agree or disagree, but we will talk about it further, discuss it further, and for now, a short pause, and you and i will return to the live broadcast on the espresso tv channel, wait, a medicinal plant is in the hands of a specialist. belladonna, so dangerous in nature, turns into belastesin, an ally in the fight against spasm. belastezin, a medicine with belladonna extract, for gastritis and sharp pains in the stomach. discover the power of teamwork at the 31st lviv international book forum. from october 3 to 6 in powder tower and downtown lviv, public interviews, discussions of ukrainian and foreign authors and intellectuals, presentations of new books, autograph session, program and favorite night of poetry and music, join in lviv live, online in the world. october 3-6,

more details, on book forum ua. usual tasks become unreal, heavy bags are not for my sick back. for back pain, try dolgit cream. dolgit cream relieves pain, reduces swelling and improves joint mobility. dollheit is the only yellow cream for joint pain and back when buying a large one. packaging of 150 g, you save up to 50%. in the frantic flow of various events, it is sometimes difficult to determine what is most important. the country magazine will help to understand the essence of phenomena and processes. qualitative analytics and independent experts. with the country in the center of the main events. miner atalanta only on mego. who plan to spoil the evening of the italian goddess and continue the fight for the playoffs of the champions league. cheer on october 2

at 19:45 exclusively on megogo. when it is already difficult to walk and load not joy, these may be the first signs of heart problems, then rapid heartbeat with interruptions, sudden dizziness, already unstable pressure, constant fatigue and weakness. and pressure in the chest more and more often. kratal it contains natural components and

carefully cares for your heart and blood vessels. when the heart reminds of itself. kratal kratal is a natural force for your heart. an unusual look at the news. good health, ladies and gentlemen. my name is mykola veresin. facts and competent opinions, for example, if mykola september did so, he would have gone to prison, a special view on the events in ukraine, so it is not necessary to say that the fish rots from the head, no, not from the head, and beyond. and then who is china? my heart hurts. all this in an informational marathon with mykola veresny. saturday 17:10, sunday 18:15 at espresso. hundreds of thousands of square meters of damaged property, apartments, houses that need to be rebuilt, about the situation with reconstruction in different regions of ukraine, about

people's rights, opportunities and personal experience. olga's house was like this last year, and this is what he looks like now. i don't spend money at the moment, about how to unite the country in the process of recovery in the project of the urban reconstruction and development program, every saturday at 18:30 for espresso. we are coming back, the saturday political club, pryamiy eter, andrii smolii and vitaly portnikov. and from one diplomacy. from one part of the world we will move to another, no less important, in fact, there are other opinions, and there is another position, or rather not one, the position of a whole number of states, regarding the so- called peace plan, this time already in our country chinese or brazilian diplomacy, and they

are joined by hungary, and we see that even switzerland, china, and brazil are gathering their... group of supporters of their plan, and we see that, unexpectedly, the plan is supported by switzerland, in particular, they said that they also actually see the possibility of participating in such a peaceful initiative, in addition, even we are not surprised by this, but viktor orbán, the prime minister of hungary, also essentially said that he is ready to join this very ... this informal group of china, brazil, or the global south, and what offered in china, they, in particular, onegi, offer the following formula: first negotiations, or rather, i apologize, first a ceasefire, then negotiations and refraining from

sanctions, that is, such a triad, mr. vitaly, to you... the question is about this plan, whether can this plan be considered as the one that plays into putin's hands, and what game china and brazil are playing now against the background of, again, the same elections in the usa and the same plans presented by ukraine and our allies well, by the way, this is the answer to the question of how much we played this game ourselves. with a large number of countries that should support our peace formula, how important are these representative international forums to us, do we not think that someone else can also hold them, because we understand that when on the eve of the first peace forum, china refused to participate in it, instead, the ministry of foreign affairs of this country organized such a large international tour of its special representative lihui to the countries

of the global south, then in this situation it naturally became clear that china has an alter... the chief adviser to the president of brazil, celsua marim, agreed that this will not only be a chinese plan, but a chinese-brazilian plan, it has already become clear that china wants to give it the appearance of at least a major international alternative, and it seems to me that they understand this in kyiv from the podium of the session of the un general assembly, volodymyr zelensky condemned this plan, called it non-constructive, this is also, i would say, quite unexpected for diplomacy. the decision that if you want to build some kind of relationship with china there, you definitely do not condemn its peace initiatives with rostrum of the session of the general assembly, but it is by and large zelensky's style to say from high rostrums what he considers to be true and real, that's how he works, so here again the question is not about zelensky, the question is about shizen pin, of course, what do you want xizen ping, he wants

to demonstrate once again that there are two worlds, there is the world of the west, which imposes sanctions, and there is the world of the global south, which can... save anyone from these sanctions, if you are a good partner of this global afternoon, and the way iran exists and the way russia exists demonstrates this history once again, it shows that there is a world in which one group of countries does not maintain relations with the conflicting party, which is the united states and the european union, which broke off relations with russia, and there is a world in which they try to talk to everyone, and by the way, we ourselves, i also said, from our love of purity and a rather childish understanding of reality, give china such an opportunity, because look, wanyi is gathering this a group of friends of peace, right? on the other hand, it comes to meeting of the un security council. which was organized , of course, for volodymyr zelensky so that he could give a clear speech about his formula for peace and his vision of peace, and there

he speaks, despite the fact that the representative of russia at the un security council, not bendzia, called the meeting a theater, a performance for zelensky , but vani takes part in it, that is, shows that this is not a performance for zelenskyi, and he is ready to participate in events held with the participation of zelenskyi, then vani meets with the minister of foreign affairs. andriy of ukraine stibigo and, most importantly, the real head of ukrainian diplomacy, andriy yarmak, because we understand that in our conditions the minister of foreign affairs is not the chief diplomat, our chief diplomat is the head of the president's office, and the minister of foreign affairs is the manager of his own ministry, and so too, so , if everyone sees that he is not just talking to sebiga, but to yermak , that is, there is a conversation at the level of leaders, because ivan is not only the minister of foreign affairs, but also the head of the party office of foreign policy, it is approximately there, the position that yermak holds is real, but if you find an analogue of yermak's position, then it is wang yi, the head of the international office of the central committee of the communist party of china, so

it is clear that the ukrainians also want to talk with china, and the russians do, because at this very session, van meets with sergey lavrov, they have a friendly meeting, and then who are the friends of peace, the americans or the chinese, well, of course the chinese, if they talk to both and they want to do business with them, and then an alternative track is created. and here again at this meeting friends of peace already have many participants, that is, i am not surprised, because there is hungary, because i would say so, and there is polarization, and you really have to be the first to catch this chinese boat, because the next ones may simply not be taken, they won't be needed, that's why turkey, that's why switzerland, switzerland what, and what is switzerland doing there? switzerland is a neutral country, if it maintains neutrality, it should be. a participant in all formats, this is their foreign policy logic, kazakhstan, pakistan, pakistan, why, because india is not in this format, so pakistan

wants to be in good relations with china, it believes that china should be its main partner of utterances, when india is getting closer to the united states, there is pakistan, and yes, and so you can about every country say, but i am convinced if china decides to assemble a large representative forum. these friends of peace, there will probably be about as many countries as there were at our summit, because it will be like, let's say, how participation in the peace forum was by and large a manifestation commitment to the civilized world to america, to the group of seven, so this forum of friends of peace will be a manifestation of commitment to china, and between us, so to speak, we will have a big dilemma if... we will avoid this format, call it non-constructive, and russia goes there, then all the diplomatic results of our peace forum

will be nullified by china, because almost the whole world will gather without the united states, without canada, without the european union, but all the others, those whom we wanted so much all the time for reasons i do not understand to see, they will all go there, and the russians will come, we won't be there, and everyone will say, well, who wants peace, ukraine is simply not an independent state, when the americans told it to leave, they went to switzerland, now the americans, when peace is really close, they we did not go anywhere, and if we go, as you understand, it will also be a diplomatic disaster, because we will end up at the same table with the russians, when we did not invite them, when we were invited together with them, like two brawlers who should to die it will be a clear equalization a victim of the aggressor, and of course, this will not happen under the conditions that the ukrainian society thinks about, this is also, by the way, a big problem that you must always

remember, andriy, that any negotiations and any if you imagine a cease -fire, it will not end as most of our compatriots think, if there will be any peace terms at all, then they may be difficult for the majority of ukrainians to perceive, and we are not preparing for this either, because our people still live in situations we solve what will the peace be like now we are fighting, and if we decide, then there will be the peace we want, that is one problem, but of course, china is playing its own game, and i keep saying that we will not be able to sit on these two chairs, because these two the chairs concluded that there are two worlds, the world, relatively speaking, of america, the european union, the world of this group of seven, and the world of the global south. the biggest problem is when you fall out of one of the worlds, you fall out of both worlds. this is a real problem. it used to be called multi-vector external

politics, but on the other hand, when there was... the multi-vector foreign policy of the kuch era, we understand, we were simply in the sphere of influence of russia and thus played with a kind of multi-vectority, had some kind of relationship with the west to a certain, at least economic border, well and now it's all, now it's all clear what 's going on with this situation, which is either we're going to get peace with the west or we're going to get peace with china, but each time it's not going to be the peace that we... we consider the most comfortable for ourselves, well and all, by the way, the political edition came out with a publication that ukraine allegedly sends some secret letters, well secret, not secret, not secret anymore, if a politician writes about it, but less so and asks the country not to support china's peace plan , i don't know how well, since china sent letters and

asked not to support ukraine's peace formulas . you remember, and in addition to this, anthony blinken, the secretary of state of the united states of america, at the meeting with vani, whom we also mentioned, stated that china's talk about peace in ukraine is inconsistent with actions, including, there was also information from blinken that about two-thirds of the vertstats, which are understood to be used later for... the production of weapons and 90% of microcircuits, microelectronics, that is, what is used to produce missiles, shaheds, others, there are cabs, the same ones that hit our border, in sumy, in kharkiv, in zaporizhzhia, 90% are actually imported by russia from china, but that's not all, in the current week with information appeared:

including in the western media, that on the territory of china, russia allegedly established some kind of joint production of drones, and these drones are either already supplied or will be supplied to the territory of russia in the future for the war with ukraine, that is, you see, there is already a direct statement by the us secretary of state, there are direct data, how much is being supplied, it is in parallel. information about the fact that china is arming russia, and if it is true that there is a joint production of drones there, that there are some russian facilities, production weapons on the territory of china, this essentially means that china is no longer simply indirectly supports russia in the war, is not just a so-and-so country that sits on two chairs, but...

in fact, is the state that de facto provides russia with lethal weapons, how do you comment on this whole array information we have, both from officials and the media? well, i have a counter question, this is what the secretary of state of the united states, that is, the head of the diplomatic mission of a country that no one attacked, is talking about, and how ukraine behaves with the chinese, when the president of ukraine. asked if he knows about this supply of weapons to china, russia, he said that no weapons are supplied and were not supplied, and that he was promised this by shizen ping, huh, that is, president zelensky is still proud of his phone conversation with shizen ping, how the highest diplomatic achievement, because we in the power circles of dolka have an illusion that sooner or later china will decide to reconcile us with russia on good terms, we will come to an agreement with him, he will give us money, these people continue

to live in this illusion. that's when dmytro kuleba met and invited her to guangzhou, and now, when andriy sivbiga and andriy yarmak met from a bathroom in new york, the ukrainian side was generally publicly asking questions about supplying china with at least dual technologies. we behave with the chinese like people who really want to please comrade vanier, under no circumstances should we say no to him, which would be unpleasant for him. here is an important moment of this trouble, the first and... one of the first, as i came, is the criticism of china by the president of ukraine at the session of the general the assembly of the united nations, not china, but the chinese plan, exclusively the chinese plan, but no one criticizes the chinese policy. this is what blinkin says, zelensky should say. it should be tsibiga, vani, it should be in the press service of the ministry of foreign affairs of ukraine that the minister of foreign affairs of ukraine presented

the chinese people to the minister of foreign affairs. republic of the issue of supplies to russia.