on the ukrainian side, was the question of the supply of at least dual technologies to cat publicly raised at all? we behave with the chinese like people who really want to please comrade vanya, under no circumstances should we say no to him that would make him uncomfortable. here is an important point of this trouble, the first such one of the first that came, this is criticism. from the president of ukraine at the session of the general assembly of the united nations, not china, but the chinese plan, exclusively the chinese plan, but no one criticizes the chinese politics this is what blinkin says, zelenskyi should say, tsibig should say, vani, it should be in the press service of the ministry of foreign affairs of ukraine that the minister of foreign affairs of ukraine raised the question of supplying russia to the minister of foreign affairs of the people's republic of china. technologies that can be

used in the war against ukraine, and emphasized that no peacemaking efforts by china can be considered fruitful in the event that china helps with its industrial role, the continuation of the work of the military-industrial complex of the russian federation. it all sounds, does not sound. we now behave with china the way we behaved with russia at one time. god forbid, at meetings with russians. officials to say something they don't like after 2019, when it's clear that we can't say what they don't like, at least not to mention their names, no matter how the president of ukraine from 2019 didn't mention putin's name in negative context or any context, so he doesn't mention shizen pine's last name now and it would seem, well, we already see that such a policy has suffered an absolute fiasco.

once, we continue it again, well, what can i do, i can't rewire the brains of the people who make decisions, so this is a reality, this reality, by the way, applies to many things in terms of approaches to china, if you remember you see, i have been explaining since 2022 that if you want to have any serious relations with china at all, you should not treat it as if you are a potential colony of china, because you are only whetting its appetite, as you previously whetted the appetite of the russians, you can do it with china to have... business only when you pursue a policy of strong partnership, if so why don't we open ourselves up, i said in 2022, at least the representation of this taipei economic commission, which works in every better capital of a civilized country in the world, which is in warsaw, which is in moscow, for many decades, and nothing china and russia, as you can see, will fall on this matter, because russia has shown that it can support economic relations with taiwan, and let china avoid it, she admits.

one-china policy, but economic relations, you will not dictate to us here, because we are russia, it is not for you to dictate to us, but we behave as a country that can be dictated to, we keep our deputies from traveling to taiwan all the time, we prevented the trip of the head of the international affairs committee of the verkhovna rada of ukraine, when it was already an almost announced unofficial visit, despite the fact that taiwan absolutely supports ukraine, and taiwan can be a source of technology supply for ukraine. and taiwan is a country with a very powerful lobby, say, among those republican, american, favor, which we are so looking for, and taiwan perfectly understands that if russia solves the issue of ukraine's statehood, then taiwan will be next, it does not completely bypass us, only at certain moments, when zelensky is already seriously offended by these dynpins, the question arises, not to leave someone to taiwan, then this china greater china appears again. the illusion and all that fades away, and

my assumption was that if you have a level of relations with taiwan, you can manage that level, it is a managed conflict in relations with chinese partners, let's say when mr. sebiga tells comrade wang-yi, you know, here we have the speaker of the verkhovna rada going to taiwan with a trip, but if you don't hold this summit of your friends of peace on... the vice-speaker goes, not the speaker, then comrade wangyi will seriously think about who he should invite to such meetings, so as not to get a new defeat in his one-china policy, which is much more important to china than 10 ukraine, and is it worth it at all this diplomatic game of such a loss to the vasiyan-texakan basin, and if we talk to china all the time from the point of view, what would we do? do to

please them, then i will tell you what you need to do to please china, establish friendly, close relations with the russian federation, negotiate with the president of the russian federation vladimir putin on his terms, give him... only as much territory as he wants , announce your neutrality, demilitarization, denazification, then you know everything and you will have friendly relations with china, capitulate, in short, if you do not want capitulate, you will not have friendly relations with china, as long as you have not met wang yidzenping, looked at them with dreamy eyes, dreamed of some business interests in china, it will not matter, get this stupidity out of your head like everyone else the previous nonsense that you had in your head before the fiasco of february 24, 2022, what do you need? to do and we cannot understand it in any way, by the way, because we do not judge february 24 , 2022 as a fiasco, because if we told ourselves that the course that was chosen in 2019 , which led to the victory in the elections , volodymyr zelenskyi's fiasco is over, not

the president himself, this is not even a question of zelenskyi, but of supporters of this course, this is such a general national fiasco, we believed that it was possible to come to an agreement with putin, we tried... to fight with him, he is at this time was preparing to attack us, if we evaluated this as a national fiasco, then we could correctly build our policy towards china, but if we all the time believe that it is just it happened because it happened, we are victims, we are useless here, we have absolutely nothing to do with the development of events, that we are all the time in a political kindergarten, where we are not responsible for anything, not even for our own stupidity, then we will make mistakes again, and china will take advantage of these mistakes, because china - this is a country with cynical leaders, they have a completely different value system than the americans there or the europeans, they like you, as kamela harris said to donald trump about putin, so the chinese definitely like you they will eat it for lunch and keep another piece for themselves for dinner and what can be the consequences of

such a senseless policy towards china, and what can ukraine do negatively in the end . well, you have already partially answered the question, but in general, we must explain to the audience, after all, how about russia, we saw what consequences we got married not only there, if we are talking about the 19th and 20th, but in general, in principle, after the restoration independence, but with china, what, what can we have on the way out, and i will tell you that we should now be interested in stopping. export technologies from the people's republic of china to the russian federation, that is, we must act with a united front by the united states and, on the contrary, we must force european countries to introduce secondary sanctions against the people's republic of china. what can we get if we don't do this, and if

when the americans talk about the chinese helping russia with weapons, we pretend that we don't see and hear it, and the americans look certain. hysteria in the eyes of even ukrainians, europeans, well of course, the americans will say that, well, they are just in a confrontation with china, and why should we pay attention to this, because you understand how many people in the world who want to make money from china, especially in european countries, you saw how they all go there, it's as if it's covered with honey, macron, scholz, melons, you can imagine what kind of lobby china has in the world, i'm already saying, even in ukraine. when i look even at some ukrainian experts who talk about china, i understand exactly what course they are on do they adhere to the political and why? we have, i would say, now our entire informational world and business world and so on, infiltrated by china in the same way that it was infiltrated with

russia, only with this difference that it may cost us statehood, so if we do nothing, we are not stopping china, we are not introducing secondary sanctions, russia continues to build up its military-industrial complex. to have new weapons, new projectiles, new drones, new tanks, so she is fighting us as long as she needs to for the final elimination ukrainian statehood, all we can have are interconnected things, firstly, secondly, we must clearly understand that we are not a country of the global south, and that the countries of the global south do not play any role in our survival at all, and that this a game of numbers, some very childish game, how many countries support us, what difference does it make, how many countries support you, it is important how many countries give you money, it is important how many countries give you weapons, not so much how many countries support you vote in the un, here is a simple example, how many countries vote in the un, now in support of israel, not many, but not many, the majority votes against, there are many countries that abstain,

only a few countries in the united nations vote in support of israel, right? how did it help hassan nasrala, this vote, don't you know? we are fighting all the time for this resolution of the general assembly session. as if it matters from the point of view of our real survival, well, these countries will vote for our support even when russian troops are stationed in uzhhorodka, it does not matter, our the task is to have them there... there are no troops, if even 60% of the countries of the global cock will not support, even 80, this is the problem of the countries of the global south, if kazakhstan or azerbaijan or turkey vote against us, conditionally speaking, that they will change their position, and for god’s sake, they won’t supply us with something there, they won’t supply some indestructible yurts, some humanitarian ones... let it be supplied, but we will do without it, but

without weapons, without missiles, without patriots, we will not do without, we will simply die for it, no need just calling a spade a spade, diplomacy in war has zero meaning, the very idea that all the countries of the world will gather and tell putin that he got out of ukraine has nothing to do with reality, because putin is the president of a nuclear country, he spat on all these countries together with... he understands only the language of the power of economic exhaustion, and we, with our illusions of a foreign policy nature, i would say not professionalism, actually give china the opportunity to be where it is, create an alternative plan, we always wanted to lure this china to this peace forum, remember, as if it had any significance, well, vani would come there, well, by the way, a good illustration, here van'i came to... the meeting of the council of the un security council, at which zelensky was present, came, came,

spoke, spoke, what has changed, well, he would have come to this peace forum, well, he would have also spoken there, he would have left his china-brazil plan, he would have shaken zelensky’s hand with the president of switzerland and left would, that would change from his presence, nothing, except some to our satisfaction that we still have china in our collection, well, i don't collect cars. i say again, i don't see anything wrong with the peace forum, i always said that the peace forum from the point of view of diplomatic support of ukraine is an important thing, that we play our role in the international arena as a victim of aggression, but then let's not to mix it with the end of the war, i only mean that, because it has nothing to do with each other, and about nasralli, and we, you already, and you already zralu, you already mentioned. about hassan nasrallah became the actual target of the attack,

liquidated as well as the absolute majority of hezbollah leaders, in particular, in fact, in fact, we have observed over the past few days, hundreds of strikes by israel on hezbollah targets on the territory of lebanon, and today it has already been officially confirmed. information that hassan nasralu was eliminated by one and one of the strikes on these objects. mr. vitaly, we can claim that hezbollah is over, will it actually continue to act, will it continue to take any action against israel, because in fact we have witnessed a very effective, fast. i would i would say the lightning operation of the state

of israel against this de facto terrorist organization hezbollah, when in fact almost all the leaders, both of the highest rank and the middle rank, well, not all of them should be said that i, as far as i understand, this is the head of the executive committee nastrali hachem sophia dean, he is alive, he can become the new head of the organization. there are always such organizations, someone after, but after such devastating blows, there is a future for this organization, will we still see a de-escalation in the north of israel and we will see that its influence on the territory of lebanon begins to decline sharply? well, look, this organization, it exists precisely because there is a radicalized shia population in lebanon, just as hamas exists because there is a radical in the gaza sector. as long as such organizations have a social basis and have the money

that iran gives, they will of course be founded. another issue is combat resources. basically, let's think, hassan nasrallah became the head of this organization in 1992, right? how many years has it been? well, 32 years, 33, 33 you think in that time did the israeli special services have the opportunity to eliminate him? well, in principle? why not, well, but they didn't do it, although i think there were much easier ways to eliminate hassan on the sides than to hit this bunker with these famous bombs that he killed. they can break through the bunker, the problem is that there have always been certain red lines in the middle east that allowed us to live in the conditions of, i would say, conflict management, after october 7, 2023, these lines, they are destroyed, and therefore everything is happening

in absolutely new conditions, and therefore no one knows what will happen tomorrow. and i can't tell you that hezbollah will cease to exist there, or it will de-escalate the situation, i think it can de-escalate the situation only for one reason, if hezbollah now definitely does not have a command center and arsenals to attack israel . if it turns out that the death of the leaders will not greatly affect this, then there will be an israeli ground operation in lebanon. israel does all this from one. actually a real goal, he doesn't want to stretch the front in a situation where he can't end the war in the sector gas, when all these goals of ending the war in the gas sector, they are moving from week to week because there is no peace agreement, there is no appeasement, there is no release of the hostages, there is no such thing, and we are already approaching october 7, 2024, it is already a few days away ,

it's a year of war, for the middle east it's not just a lot, it's a lot. a year of active hostilities. as you understand, and israel as a state has never existed in such a situation, we do not even know how it will continue to exist, how it will affect security population, on the readiness of the people, on repatriation to israel, on the readiness of the israelis themselves to be in this country. people are used to the fact that this happens every other week, that they are safe, that just such a clash of armies, everything stops. here people understand that they will have to live like ukrainians for years, and think about it, nitanya is doing all this because he wants to return people to the north, to kiryat shmana, metula, other cities and settlements, all these people, they became internal refugees in small countries, and that's it imagine that you have to go to stelavi chmani, well

, it takes 2.5 hours to drive there, maybe less, and you can't go home. this is not the distance between donetsk and kyiv or from kharkiv to kyiv, it is the distance from the white church to kyiv, relatively speaking, well, well, the white church, well, cherkas, no cherkas is even too much, probably still a white church , imagine that you have a house in the white church, and you are somewhere in a shelter in tel aviv or in a shelter in kyiv, and you cannot go to the white church, how do you feel, how much you feel safe in such a country, we just have a big... territory here, a person can go from the shelled kharkov, if he feels in danger, to kyiv or ternopil, and it is safer there, as it were, but it is a long distance, you drive a long distance, here you don't drive anything, well, i don't know how to explain it, well, at one time i used to go back and forth from chmana to tel aviv there during the day, when i needed it, and when i lived next to kyria chmana for a month,

my family can imagine very well, well no, well, i think that our viewers can imagine it... if we take one, one region, let's say, kyiv region, or zhytomyr region or there, and imagine how far we go from the border there from zhytomyr region and there to the white church or to pereyaslav, that is, that, of course, you can imagine, because in reality israel is somewhere approximate in size, it seems to me, one and a half of our region, yes, what else needs to be understood the important thing is that you... live in this kyiv region, but if you stop by, conventionally speaking, to a conditional district in this region, you can be killed there, you should go around this district, because there are people living there who are ready to kill you, in the literal sense of the word, not to say anything bad to you, but just to kill you , and you know that in principle you are guaranteed safety in such conditions, but now it is difficult to say, so of course

the israeli government is making efforts, but i repeat again that since all these red lines have been destroyed, i do not know what these efforts , i will tell you honestly, will end, that is, of course, a blow to hasan nastral is a serious crossing of all the red lines that were in israel's relations with these proxy armies of iran. now everything, you are absolutely right, mr. andriy, depends on how much you understand their military potential, if this military potential is not there, if... they will have to rebuild their entire organizational character, military potential now, if the influence of hezbollah decreases in lebanon, it is a completely different story, because then... they will even think about the gas sector at all, because they have seen all along, that they should besiege israel, and yes, if they don't really have the resources, this is the same formula that i offered you when we

talked about russia, if iran doesn't have the resources to rebuild and maintain these proxy armies, then iran will have to think at least about a pause, about restoring the balance of its forces and about political opportunities, etc., and what... you understand that hezbollah is also a big social donor, it is an organization that distributed to the poor population lebanon, cheat money, so these people do not understand how they will live because they are used to parastatizing with the help of hesbla, that is, on the one hand, hesbla turned lebanon into a state in which there are no jobs and prospects, there is no political anything, you know that the president has not been there for 600 days, and now there is one of of lebanese politicians, who, of course , all... er expressed incredible regret over the death of such a wonderful patriot as hassan nasral, he said: our response to the assassination of nasrallah should become the election

of the president of lebanon, and nasrallah did everything it is possible for there to be no president of lebanon, that was his idea, why is there a president of lebanon, if there is no president of lebanon, then who is the real leader of lebanon? hassan nasrallah, here is the government of lebanon, here we are, now there will be a meeting of the government, and what is the significance of a meeting of the government when these ministers do not have any functions, did not have ... at least until today, when the lebanese army has fewer military personnel, than in the army of hezbollah, you understand, that is, they led to the degeneration of the whole state, once, to the fact that people of other faiths, lebanese christians, sunnis, the muslims, the druze, have found themselves in this state virtually subjugated to their influence and are now forced to express false regret at the death of a man. they all hate, this must also be understood, they hate, but they are afraid to say it, because they are hostages, in fact the entire population of iran is not shiite, they are hostages of this terrorist gang, and the moderate shiites

are even more hostages, because they are afraid to say a word, lest they they just didn't kill the speaker of the lebanese parliament nab beli, he is the leader of another shiite party, amal, but the problem is that he was the leader of this amal all his life, and hezbollah appeared after the radical forces from this. that is, these are the schismatics of his party, he hates them, but he is forced to say that he is very distressed by the fact that the motherfucker, whom he himself expelled from his party, was killed by an israeli rocket, here is the whole story with lebanon, so let's see, how this will all play out is a very complicated story and we see the israeli government going to desperate lengths to try not to globalize this war in the middle east that he will succeed i don't know, the more that you see there are still arab influences. we talked about the session of the un general assembly, and you know that at the session of the un general assembly saudi arabia, we talked about what china and brazil are doing, and saudi arabia, which

china and brazil want to invite to their platform of friends, it is creating another coalition, a coalition for a two-party solution to the middle east problem, it wants to involve as many countries as possible in this coalition. who will agree with the reality of the creation of a palestinian state, and now china and brazil are forced to exchange their friends of peace for participation in this coalition, and this is also a problem for israel, because you saw that it is impossible to say that israel now occupies such obvious positions in the international community, which would allow it to feel easy in the international arena , no, does not take, and this is also a new situation for israel, when it does not enjoy obvious support even in the countries of the west, not that there... what is the position of the three states that i will name, it is, well of course, iran, and what iran can actually do, because

there have been another threat from the vice president of iran, we see that some kind of revenge is being announced there, once again they are telling us that israel will be the end of everything there, well, we are the target... we already know alky, we have not heard anything else turkish position, maybe they heard, maybe i heard, i heard erdogan condemned israel, maybe i didn't hear, because erdogan, i heard, i saw the speech erdogan, we remember the howl that arose after the actual operation against hamas against the terrorists began, and what in general erdogan was doing there and in turkey, which there were rallies. and by the way, about china, which is interesting, about china, china, the one about whom we talk a lot today, stated

that china will firmly support it. is interested in the fact that there is no war in lebanon, because france has special interests in it must be said that there is also france, which is also lebanon, and it considers itself responsible for the security of lebanon, as a former metropolis. and israel also has to take this into account, that is, not naturally, none of the politicians in france supports hezbollah, but one way or another the lebanese topic is always used in in the french domestic political context, even you know that mélenchon, he came to beirut as a sign of solidarity with lebanon, and his political opponent there also sees all this, because you understand that many french voters are people of arab origin, which means that they immediately find themselves

in pockets mélenchon after such visits, so of course, in this situation, i will not even hide that it seems to me that now the french also, well, two minutes ago, the minister of foreign affairs of france, called for the immediate cessation of israeli military aid to iran, you see, we just started talking about it, he already made this statement in sync with my thoughts about... france, and this must also be realized, so of course turkey will support not just lebanon, it will support hezbollah, that is, russia will support iran, iran will support hezbollah, and there are countries that will support lebanon and try to restore stability there, this is first of all, as we understand.

what is the position what is the position of the united states america in this case, the united states is trying to pretend that it has nothing to do with what is happening, that it does not want to take responsibility. united states secretary of defense lloyd austin stated that he learned of the polivan raid from israeli defense minister ivan gallant while the raid was already underway, without being informed by anyone, ie the united states of israel. do not support, do not condemn, and in fact take such a position, not applying their own role in this story, that is, in fact there are no americans among the critics of israel, there are russians, as you know, because i don't know if you have seen the statement from moscow. which was

after the death of nasrala, but this is also quite an important statement, in fact, which condemns israel, and here it is absolutely clearly stated in the statement of the ministry of foreign affairs of russia that moscow strongly condemns the latest political murder carried out by israel and insists that israel stop the military. in fact stands on the positions of hezbollah, i support us and, by the way, russian propaganda , today i specially looked through the russian warmongers, russian propagandists, all these nightingales and so on, and there, if they do not directly talk about it, then indirectly they talk about the fact that it is terror, about the fact that you look at what is happening in the world, and you are there for some reason blame russia

there. and so on and the like, that is , in fact, in fact, maybe not so expressed, but russia clearly demonstrates whose side it is on, of course, and it is obvious that russia, it is on the side of iran, first of all, but now it is very important to understand how really will act iran, because in principle absolutely i agree with those observers who say that the liquidation... this is a direct blow specifically to iran, you see, this was not the case with hamas, hamas is an organization that iran could always put under the knife, so to speak, it is a sunni organization, it people who were simply at the mercy of these, the iranians, and they principles could use them to destabilize israel.