which are ideal for women, men and children. these are not just comfortable shoes, they are your personal comfort at any time of the day, and best of all, prices start at just uah 299. give comfort and care to yourself and your loved ones. juni will be liked by everyone at home. call! we're going back to the studio, that's it. a week that ends in numbers, if you translate it, it is 900 guided bombs, 300 shaheds and 40 guided missiles, these are the statistics of the war for this week alone, and it seems that the russians want the statistics only make it worse for us, this morning an il-76 freighter arrived in moscow from iran, we can only guess what it is carrying there, but it is easy to guess the military purpose of this cargo.

to be given, well, the monitors record the charging of migs and maneuvers related to the delivery of shaheds to the launch sites, this is their activity, this is what it looks like, at the same time , it is very difficult to say how adequate this country is, the aggressor here, we missed it yesterday, and it turns out that yesterday lavrov solemnly signed it, russia and burkina faso signed it the agreement on refusal to be the first to change. hearing weapons in space, and you and i know that burkina faso has only been doing that for the last 150 years, placing something in space, that's right, that is, we have to deal with such inadequate people armed to the teeth. we will talk about other cooperation, other partnership later, because the last week was actually the biggest, probably, event, and there was a general assembly, a session of the un general assembly, and zelensky actually went there, he was supposed to take part in it, but it turned out a little.

more, because there are several other important meetings spent, in particular, with biden, and with kamela harris, and with trump it was even possible to meet, what was agreed upon, we have already heard, but more, what all this can lead to, what are the results of this week's trip, let's see, let's in our story: american a dream that almost became a tragedy, the fifth visit of president... zelenskyi to the united states since the beginning of the full-scale invasion did not immediately go as planned. a visit to a factory for the production of artillery shells on the first day of the train turned into a scandal. all because of his place location - pennsylvania. it's a key battleground between democrats and republicans that could decide the fate of the november election. zelensky arrived there accompanied by the governor and other state officials. they were all democrats, and sort of. this caused anger in

the republican camp, in particular, led to the cancellation of a meeting between the ukrainian leader and the speaker of the lower house of congress, mike johnson, who wrote an ultimatum letter to the ukrainian president. dear president zelensky, i demand that you immediately released the ambassador of ukraine to the usa, oksana markarova. the visit was an obvious party campaign event designed to help the democrats and is definitely an interference in the election process. this. a short-sighted deliberate political move led to the fact that republicans lost confidence in ambassador markarov's ability to honestly and effectively perform his diplomatic functions in this country. mike johnson, speaker of the us house of representatives. these were the first signs of the political tornado that the ukrainian delegation was caught in. candidate from of republicans, donald trump, who has so far tried to speak about ukraine and its president discreetly and avoiding specifics.

dramatically changed the record, he accused zelensky of quote "dirty little attacks" against him, and also complained that the ukrainian leader does not want to make a deal with putin to end the war. there is no more ukraine, this is no longer ukraine, you can never replace these cities and towns, and you can never replace the dead, so many dead, any deal, even the worst, would be better." than that which we have now perhaps the narcissistic politician was offended by zelensky's statements, which he made on the eve of his visit to the usa in an interview with the new yorker. the president of ukraine , in particular, suggested that trump does not know how to end the war and rejected the proposal of his partner jaydy vance to freeze the conflict along the contact line. or maybe it was a well thought-out strategy of the trump camp: to involve ukraine in the american elections with... democrats in foreign

intervention. the situation seemed very bad, but in the end the meeting between trump and zelensky it still happened. thanks to which it is not clear to the end. it is only known that it was agreed upon at the last moment, and the ukrainian leader was even forced to extend his visit to the united states for a day. do you think that ukraine should give its territories to russia? we'll see what happens. what do you plan to say to zelenskyi? peace must be achieved, we need peace, we must end the death and destruction. don't you think so? will it be bad? these statements were made. in the new york skyscraper trump tower, one of of the official residences of the former president on thursday evening, zelensky arrived here already on friday morning, this time trump praised the ukrainian leader for courage during the war and a neutral position during the

impeachment proceedings against trump back in 2019, but continued his rhetoric about the need to quickly stop the war i think we have something in common. we have a very good relationship, and i also have a good relationship with president putin, i think when we win, we will solve all this very quickly, i hope we have a better relationship with you, of course, but for tango it takes two, the meeting lasted an hour, after its conclusion, trump and zelenskyi... again went to the press, the republican candidate declared that he was in favor of a fair deal, but again avoided specifics and publicly accepted zelenskyi's invitation to come to ukraine, someday, at any time in any case, the worst-case scenario of a tough confrontation with one of the presidential candidates, the ukrainian leader

managed to avoid at the last moment. today , the meeting with donald trump was very productive and detailed. i am very grateful. it was generally filled with long, extremely an important week in america. meetings with another camp of american politicians at first glance went better. president biden announced a new security package worth 2 billion 400 million dollars, and also guaranteed that ukraine will receive all the reserved 8 billion dollars of aid by the end of his presidential term. the armed forces will provide winged aerial bombs. join stand off weapon, with a range of up to 110 km. let me be frank: russia will not win. in the war, russia will not win. ukraine will win, and we will continue to stand next to you

vice president and democratic candidate kamala harris was even more decisive in her statements. she promised to seek the victory of ukraine if she becomes president, and rejected the ideas of trump and vance. about peace at any price. some in my country would force ukraine to surrender a significant part of its sovereign territory, would demand that ukraine accept neutrality and renounce security agreements with other countries. these proposals are no different from putin's proposals. these are proposals not for peace, but for surrender. this is dangerous and unacceptable. despite encouraging statements and new aid packages in the white house. cautiously assessed the victory plan that zelenskyi brought to the usa to try to turn the tide of the war, which , according to many observers, is currently not in favor of ukraine. biden did not give a public assessment of the document, and white house officials, according to information from the american media

, were skeptical of the plan, saying that it was more of a set of requests without strategic depth. volodymyr zelenskyi will also not bring permission from america to strike deep into russia with the west. biden has not yet dared to remove another taboo, presumably, this issue will be discussed again by the current us president with the leaders of germany, france and great britain. the ramstein-style meeting is scheduled to take place on october 12 in germany, and it is unlikely that the current american administration will make any drastic moves, at least until november 5, when the american electoral rollercoaster can bring the wagon of world politics to a new one. an unpredictable trajectory, well, that's how our colleagues summed up the results of the overseas tour for a whole week, and what will come of it and are these really the conclusions from it

tour, as the world press writes about it, we will question the co-founder of the national platform of stability and cohesion, political scientist oleksa akyan in connection with our studio, mr. olezh. congratulations, let's congratulate each other. we have such an interesting situation that any person, an optimist, a pessimist, a zradophile, can find absolute conviction for himself. a publication about the fact that everything succeeded, that it succeeded more than expected, and that everything was lost and about everything that was possible and more was lost, the whole spectrum, welcome metamodern, this is modernity, post-truth is already resting, now everyone in the bubble even has their own measure of what is a success, what is a failure, and the most interesting thing is that now they are competing not even just for the evaluations of the trip, but for... these are the goals of what the trip was supposedly for, and based on of this, and the assessments of even

the expert environment differ. i remain here, well , so restrained, let's say, a centrist in this situation, since there are certain weaknesses and indeed difficulties associated with this trip, both at the tactical and strategic level, for example, according to the republicans, we we see that the situation is not the best for us as a whole, but also... certain successes, as well as at the strategic and tactical levels. first of all, in my opinion, the key issue is obtaining military support for ukraine. and it is clear that the visit took place on the fields of the un, but during it a whole series of communications took place in order to obtain military financing for ukraine now during the elections. and here it is obvious that there is success, almost 8 billion, the package is now allocated, in fact until the end of the election campaign, even. happy new year, in principle, we got certainty with the support of our army. here you can put an exact tick. for

the 25th year, there is a question mark, because after the elections, part of the house of representatives, part of the senate, the entire house of representatives, part of the senate will change, then we will have a completely different domestic political situation in the united states, in addition to a new resident of the white house, so it is clear here that the second task of a strategic nature is to... secure for us the best positions for entering the new period, and this is precisely what this formula is for victory or the victory plan, which in fact zelenskyi went almost all the way in order to create these positions for ukraine and to intercept part of the agenda, even to impose a conversation about the ukrainian victory, and in the very context of trump's attack even because of the scandal, but he added for this attention: a number of american colleagues noticed very interesting. that before ukraine's trip, the key attention was focused on israel and the middle east,

ukraine was almost not talked about publicly, although at the un site, ukraine itself was the second significance as a topic after the middle east, because we lost part of the agenda, but in particular because of all these maneuvers around trump, in fact the ukrainian issue, thanks to the formula of the victory plan and trump's actions, ukraine came to the first step, and on the contrary, all the media started. talk about ukraine, so there was no happiness, where misfortune helped, and here it was possible to intercept the agenda, to set it in the states. the third important point is that, in fact, with this visit, again, because of trump's maneuvers, it helped, they achieved a specific position from kamela harris. she of the sectoral situation against the background of trump, who began to attack ukraine, but said two very important things: firstly, that support will continue, but secondly, in my opinion, the most important thing is that this is not happening because of goodwill towards ukraine, but because of american

interest, and this is actually money that is not spent on ukraine, but that is spent to protect american interests, and this is a paradigmatic shift from what biden said, because in biden this communication was based on the fact that this is help to ukraine, which is fighting for democracy, common values, confrontation. putin will not win, but he did not use the thesis that this is the american national interest, and support for ukraine does not even depend on the steps of ukraine itself, it depends on the implementation of its interest by the united states. if kamela continues this streak, then we can write an additional argument that if she wins, we may have a more determined president than biden. and actually, about the money you already mentioned, 8 billion. quite a good amount and can actually be very helpful to us at the front, and it looks like

this money just stings the eyes and not only to someone, but korea already says that this is an incredible mistake, because you can't play like this against a nuclear superpower, and putin and lukashenko, in general, they are spreading whole tirades on this topic, that they are ready to answer, uh... putin regularly has this kind of rhetoric, he just raises the bar and constantly moves the red line, but lukashenko is something here, no one threatens him, no one threatens him, he.. . decided to say so, why, why all of them the words now, what is the point of returning to the nuclear topic again, if part of the world, in particular china, brazil, say no, this is putin's nuclear expertise, not for the first time, he takes out a warhead and tries to shake it, the truth is that no one is impressed anymore, because especially against the background of their latest tests, also the

sarmat missile, it gives the impression that the grandfather can no longer kill anyone... everyone was already afraid of some kind of nuclear tadpole, but it is also not worth underestimating it, well, first of all, it does not mean that they have nothing, they have the weapon is still a waste, you cannot underestimate the enemy, the second point, they do it also deliberately, firstly, as a propaganda internal step, but this is the least, secondly, it is the strengthening of the agenda of the third world nuclear war, etc., for the united states, how ukraine is forcing the discussion now. about ukraine's victory, so that the united states would not talk about compromises with putin, not about any options, how to share something with putin, or what to feed, on the contrary, they talked about what ukraine can win, but what should be done to win, to ask experts on television, and russia is also trying to impose a thesis about a nuclear russia, which is strong, which threatens all the time, and

trump picks it up, the trumpists disperse it internally, talking about the fact that but trump will not allow the third world, this is ... such a very easy electoral gain on the surface, because he is already forming a self-fulfilling prophecy for himself, in fact, if trump wins, then years pass and he comes out and says: see, i did not allow the third world war and if it happens, he will say: you see, i tried to prevent it, but all other forces dominated, you and i failed, but now we will resist, so it is putin who plays along with the agenda on which pres... trump? i will say right away that i am far from thinking that putin is trying to bring either trump or kamel karis to power. he is interested in confronting and radicalizing the views of the united states, fragmenting society, and therefore the radicalization of such rhetoric plays into the hands of russia, as they say, cheering for both teams are in the kremlin and want both

teams to up the ante. and the third point, this is a whole series of weak ones. in spirit, i am not talking about those who are weak in conscience and pocket and fall for russian money, abroad, and in the global south, and in asia, and in the united states, in the western world, in europe, we can identify that there is a whole low number of people who are really afraid of the nuclear factor, the fears of the 20th century are still alive, and accordingly, on them too, putin triggers this, presses this point and demonstrates, in particular, sells it, as the fact that russia is leaving its own. commonality in relation to china, because china is categorically against, even nuclear rhetoric, and with brazil they have now signed it, focused attention again, and putin is always grabbing for a nuclear warhead, which demonstrates that no, they are not a vassal of china, but allegedly have subjectivity, this should appeal to trump and other anti-chinese forces in the west, creating and reinforcing the illusion that with

russia it is possible to agree on the rules of the game with regard to china, which seems to be a greater threat than russia. mr. oleg, look, if with kemela harris and with biden, all the accents are one way or another clear and there are certain visions, so we are still in such a reality that today donald trump does not know what donald trump will say tomorrow, and that is why we want to understand, and what about us we will have trump's victory, even with this victory plan and with these agreements, because both exchanged compliments on... it was a powerful meeting, powerful, they fell in love with each other, they parted nicely, peacefully, as if they had forgotten all the insults spoken the day before, and what will be, nothing has changed, especially, it has not been allowed to deteriorate situation, and first fell into a trap, then emerged from the trap, then it turned out that trump rather outwitted himself with this

situation, because he began to lose electorally, and the camel began to take advantage of it, in the end everything turned out to... they did not gain the starting position and did not lost because of trump, if we are talking about the current situation, and in a broader context, well, any contacts are still a plus, because you need to acquire this experience and personal communication, a certain interpersonal magic, because trump is also a person oriented to personal communications, after all, after the election, if trump wins, it will be... a different trump than today, the pre-election rhetoric, as always, he may be able to forget, and his position will be determined and determined by the schedule that will be at that moment, as domestic politics and... foreign politics, i would say that the key factor for us is not what trump will decide at that moment, it is clear that he will try to activate some negotiations,

try to bargain, but it is important that he will launch intra-institutional ones purges, and the united states can simply plunge into an institutional crisis from several months to six months, what we saw in the american parliament for six months without a decision of the congress, the same thing can happen and... the state department and the treasury department, and even the pentagon, where they are also afraid that trump wants to change up to 90% of even the official apparatus, not only political appointments. and this is the situation, it will require serious stability from us, together with our european partners, reorientation to other, in particular, asian directions. i think the visit modi indian in kyiv is one with one of the bricks potentially just right. with such preparations already to minimize the risks of the united states falling out, but we must understand that we may have to live for months in conditions when the united states will

simply not like us, and we will become hostages of its internal political and institutional crisis. we understand that the polarization and confrontation of society in the united states of america, in particular, is really important to the russians, but here is the thesis. lavrov says that russia will welcome any initiatives to end the war in ukraine. from the republican donald trump, if he wins, and they add that in the event of his victory, they would like trump to cancel the laws of ukraine on the language and on the uoc, mp, are they already submitting the order, or how should these statements be interpreted? they are creating infomercials that will have to be responded to, they are already raising the stakes. it is clear that now it is air trade, both sides are working around trump, let's say. now the battle for trump's mind, heart, and attention is being fought by ukraine, russia, and our partners, we remember boris johnson met, and pompeo and others prepared their

plans, published, vanish pence published the plan, many are trying now to assemble the cubes that are in trump's head, the word happiness, and happiness that would be both for trump and for the foreign policy interest of the united states , and for transatlantic unity, it is clear. that trump could start a trade war between the united states and europe, as he has done before, and russia is trying to throw some extra dice into trump's head as well to get it together the word happiness was more difficult for us, and for russia there was more space, clearly they are collecting other words for us and for themselves, so it is obvious that in this case it is nothing more than now selling air, air and playing the future, raising rates, but... you have to take this seriously enough, because trump can really get caught, take on these tsks, and in order to take such, cancel this law. yes, mr. oleg, it’s so simple, just for a snack, i understand that in

fact, many rules are changing before our eyes, the world order is changing, the rules of the game in a world in which everything post-tehran has long been multiplied by zero, and institutions do not work, and therefore countries that have strategic thinking. uh, they are developing a plan, what will happen next, if, for example, the elections are over and trump comes to power, they have a plan a, they have a plan b and so on, that is, all countries have these plans, or in ukraine at least something appeared that we have several plans, well, for one, the results of the elections and one scenario, for the second, the results of the elections, the second scenario and some alternative in which we can not only survive, but also win. well, i can't say now whether he is or not, because it's a public hearing, and the key claim here is that there is no vision for the public, how to evaluate, but about

the plans behind closed doors, the steps that were taken both in the states and according to other meetings on work with european partners, says that at least these risks are understood in ukraine, and it is clear that there are people who are working on these areas in a professional manner, let's see how much it actually is... strategic plans, or is it are tactical let's say, in steps, but these scenarios are being considered and considered by us and by us together with a number of partners, because it is obvious that in any case, no matter what trajectory the american elections take, no matter who we put as president, we have to come out, you know, there is such a principle, when you make development strategies, you have to start from the best scenario, but when you work on security strategies, you have to start from the worst scenario. and they are working on these things, i hope that it will pay off and we will not end up in the worst case scenario, but we will be ready for it. we have two more minutes to talk, mr. oleg, we understand that it

is already over. at the beginning of this war, we understood that some new world order must appear now, and we actually see and strengthen the brics , and every time new big players appear who would like to have more influence and influence what is happening in the world, we understand that we will most likely have to wait for the elections in the united states, because depending on who wins, the situation may look different, what are your predictions. actually or when it can happen, how can this new formation of world camps of division happen, and actually we certainly hope that the democratic axis will dominate, but if we look critically, what does it look like? good question in closing, considering that i have a completely perpendicular view of it, first of all there will be no clear camps, it seems to me that the global war will now take place in a very

strange way, as a minimum ... on three different levels, these can alternate roles, for example, the same turkey can be locally a problem, on a meso level a solution, on a global level an ally, for example, with democratic countries, and vice versa, it can change depending on the country, so there will be no clear camps at the moment, secondly, i do not think that the fault line will be precisely on democracy, we see in fact , such an anthropological war of civilizations, in which ideas about what a person is and what a state is in the 21st century are fighting among themselves, china, russia, that... are competing for the state, civilization, some kind of missionary work, etc., the west is competing for the state as a service structure to ensure well-being, and further the idea of ​​a citizen and a person, why they often say, we are at war with non-humans, because everything that is inherent in the western idea of ​​a person, it is not inherent in russia, they have a different idea in russia, in iran, north korea, others, and this competition is anthropological, and the third important

point is that if we talk about brics, it is... the union is not a military-political one after all, china seized the initiative there and china is now forming a financial and economic one from it union, belt security for themselves, so that in the future it will not be possible to impose sanctions on china, as on russia, because russia is not integrated into international markets, russia trades in raw materials, and china is very dependent precisely on the financial and monetary system of world trade, and they are now seized the initiative, russia tried to make bric anti-nato, anti-g7, and china uses this principle. financial and economic union, so turkey and other countries will appear there, but then politics always follows finance, and there will be challenges and risks, but after a while, a paradox, but for us now, the increase in the number of countries participating in brics can even have a positive meaning, because if you are building a military alliance, you need as few countries as possible so that you are homogeneous and can make decisions and sharp

decisions, and if you have a lot countries, you will not be able to accept them, you have very different interests, and if it is an economic union, then you need many countries in order to have a larger market, but at the same time you can have completely different positions within them, there is a conflict of interest between china and russia , thank you, mr. oleg, for such a detailed analysis, oleg sahakyan, political scientist and co-founder of the national platform for sustainability and cohesion, was with us, roman and i also said goodbye, we wish you a good and peaceful evening, take care, then you... see the interview yu with a woman who is a representative of the center of national resistance, remember when we talked about all those explosions on the railway in samara, where were involved, yes, it's about, watch and take care, see you,

thinking about a new mattress? but this is what stops you. have you ever thought about what you sleep on? old mattresses accumulate not only dust, but also moisture that a person releases during sleep. a new mattress pad or bed linen can only improve the mattress aesthetically. choose a kemal orthopedic mattress and your sleep will become significantly better. take advantage of the super offer at half price. call now and order a camel orthopedic mattress instead of a full one. pay only half of the cost of the mattress. due to the fact that our production is located in ukraine, we will be able to quickly manufacture a mattress and deliver it directly to you. we are perfect we combine innovative technologies and modern ecological materials. dial the number you see at the bottom of the screen, and our consultants will help you choose the right size for your bed. together with the mattress, you will receive a 5-year warranty and 100 per...