it is clear that even the bluff that you and i talked about at the beginning, and everything that was said before that, no longer applies to washington, and this indicates what conclusions the central intelligence agency draws there, because when for me sounds like this when burns says at a meeting with moore that putin is bluffing, and then i read this headline, united states intelligence against providing ukraine with high-precision, long-range. weapons, i understand very well, in the united states there are more than a half dozen intelligence agencies, whoever said this phrase writes, he simply counts on the fact that these texts are read by people who simply, well, by the word intelligence they mean only the central intelligence agency, but if we take the white house, then it uses information from the intelligence committee and the central intelligence agency, but there is more joint intelligence. and the ministry of defense,

the authority of which is much higher than the system of the state apparatus of the united states of america. that is, roman petrovych, in your opinion, the united states, for example, the current administration of the current president biden, they will be ready to take a risk, a serious risk. we understand that president biden is going down in history in any case, he doesn't have much left, and in principle he doesn't have any restrictions, because he doesn't drive. at the election rallies of kamela garis with a flag and does not give out, give one or another candy bars to the voters, yes, that is, kamalagaris is somewhat separated in the imagination of americans. so, biden can take a risk given that russia has adjusted its nuclear doctrine, yes, but we understand that rather, perhaps in the public sphere of this will not happen, but may just happen another toropets, toropets-2 or toropets-3, at.

certain drones are flying, so to speak, a swarm of drones may be hidden by one or another long-range device, which can penetrate what is called a concrete protective cushion and so on, and russian anti-missile air defense systems, yes, but we also understand that our enemy is not just irrational, he is vindictive, and putin very often implements all his macabre threats. so you are one of the few who took seriously the reality of the russian attack on ukraine, how in 2014 as well as in 2022, so if we take extreme risky scenarios? and yes, first and foremost, the chordal style in the united states of america, i will immediately put it aside, it is impossible, because it is purely totalitarian. post-totalitarian system, what's

on the table, we'll do it once and for all, everything will be something, i postpone such a thing, it's the first, the second, but the implementation of the permit according to the scenario you named, it has already happened more than once, relatively speaking , we attack with a firecracker, a chorus of firecrackers brings with it a surprise, and from my point of view it is one... of of the most likely options in this situation, and in this polyphony that sounds today, this is the most likely option. as for the topic of nuclear blackmail, making changes to the doctrine, and so on, it will be written about, it must be written about, but already today it is obvious that neither the pentagon, nor the military intelligence, nor... the cia does not reflect on this ,

they simply do not react, they clearly understand that putin is bluffing, and this has been repeatedly stated recently by british intelligence and burns, who at the briefing, in including with michael more, the head of mi-6, they talked about it, now is the deadline for voicing and the deadline for the implementation of this project. from my point of view , it cannot be earlier than the end of november, and the beginning of december, i will explain, there are technological problems here. the fact is that, in some cases, five, and sometimes six, states are involved in the production of these things. as a matter of fact, simka is gathering in order to obtain consent for the use of this weapon, therefore simka has become, as it were, a tactical tool for solving and forming answers to... questions of use

of frozen funds and on including the removal of restrictions and the granting of permits, the fact that the meetings are closed. scholz, the fact that there is almost no information on the materials of the meeting with tarmer, with prime minister trudeau, with others, with the prime minister of italy, speaks of the fact that these issues are actually being discussed there, because those stamps were discussed the level of cooperation, and the size of trade and economic relations, when i read such things, i understand very well what is written in order to write, no more and no less. it is obvious what was discussed there a key issue that concerns the lifting of restrictions, plus the provision of certain types of weapons and taking a certain position. it is important here that the representatives of the european union spoke on the side of ukraine. this means

that it remains, ah, to solve the problems associated with, let's say, japan's participation in this process, because some of these types of weapons have, ah... components of japan, and this is japan bound by a number of international agreements that forbid doing this, hence it is obvious that they will be looking for partners who will take on this role not only from the point of view from the point of view of production, but also from the point of view of the composition of the corresponding types of weapons, so from my point of view, and the option that you voiced, most likely we will have it at the end of november, at the beginning of december, but there is a problem here, which related to the elections of the united states of america, and from my point of view, why is there no decision announced today, because actually everyone believes that in the current situation, when some will insist on doing it and

others will not, it is just completely will open the electoral road for one of the candidates, after kulbidu with a visit to his homeland in pennsylvania. biden's factory, when such an uproar was raised, it is obvious that no one in the united states of america will refuse now, but to voice, and it is no coincidence, pay attention to how the tension in posing this question coincided with the release of information from bloomberg and the new york times that the intelligence objected, that is, it is as if there is an information stop in this situation, and it is explained by the political situation with... the states of america, from my point of view, as i say, the decisions have been made, the option of its implementation should be expected in the period the end of november, the beginning of december, and i don't see an option, but a chordal,

dembel, as we would say, solution, forgive john biden for these issues, they are connected by a whole series, a whole series of budgetary ones. and administrative powers in the united states of america, that is why the president of the united states of america, he will never take such a step. now there will be a short pause for literally a couple of minutes, after which roman immortal will continue the analysis of all the unimportant events of this extremely busy week. the espresso library presents the plan book marshal dawn of the cold war. the marshall plan is a program of economic assistance to european states after world war ii. but the marshal's plan is not only history, it is the key to understanding how to turn the destroyed ukraine into a prosperous country. the marshall plan is a book

that reveals the lessons of the past for the creators of ukraine's future. the book is from the spirit and letter publishing house. series library espresso. a story that inspires victory. a new week on espresso, a weekly summary information and analysis program,

a clear understanding of the key events of the past of the week, analysis of the causes and consequences of these events from experts, forecasts of the development of the situation for the current week, the opportunity to ask your own questions and get involved. to the discussion, spend the final monday evening with us and confidently step into the new week. the new week project with khrystyna yatskiv and andrii smoly, every monday at 8:00 p.m. on espresso. the verkhovna rada regularly passes new laws, but how do these changes affect our lives? we have analyzed the new decrees to inform you about the latest changes in ukrainian legislation. as legislative norms change our lives, what to prepare for? leading lawyers of the aktum bar association will answer these and other questions that concern ukrainians. watch every tuesday at 7:55 in the legal expertise program on the espress tv channel.

get closer to victory, join one of the best special forces of the country, together with the central security service, the sbu. we are expanding and announcing recruitment, inviting civilian specialists from various fields. experienced commanders will ensure your high-quality training and education. for... fill out the questionnaire and choose a direction where you can to be most effective. we are waiting for you in the csoa, sbu team. together we will write the history of victory. details on the official pages of the sbu. so, roman petrovich, yes, we understand, as you rightly pointed out, that no one will go to... but when we talk about a peace plan, a victory plan, it also means a war plan, so

we cannot afford to take the enemy's intentions lightly , the enemy has written a fairly clear scenario, they are going to destroy our energy infrastructure, and after that, sometime in the spring, with the help of the people's republic of china and brazil to try to implement their plan, hoping that. that the spirit of our ukrainian society will be significantly destroyed by this extremely difficult winter, well , at least this is how it is commanded, how we should do it, how we should do it right and what we should prepare for, and in general, if we talk about the brazilian-chinese so-called peace plan, well, i would ask you to analyze it, because the minister of foreign affairs of china has so clearly outlined his visions, his formulas, and again. he remembered well-known maxims, unfortunately, beijing does not follow them when we talk

about our ukrainian interests. first, it is clear that the most important thing in the packages that are now announced by both the european union and germany, including the united states of america, is to protect the skies of ukraine. and this has been voiced more than once by both european and american partners. and here germany, italy, the united states and great britain play a key role. this is the first thing that will be done. second, what is important? it is no coincidence that washington voices two documents: the strategy, and this refers to the war plan, because this strategy consists of certain tactical steps, both on the front line and actions in the rear, and the second is the victory plan. this is a political document that provides for a relevant,

appropriate political strategy in this regard. the essence of both documents consists of this: this idea, which sounds like a so-called summit, is a kind of gingerbread. but what concerns long-range high-precision weapons, anti-aircraft, anti-missile defense systems, long-range guided air bombs, this what is called a whip. now, what to do with these plans, chinese, south african, middle eastern, i call them in general, joint sino-brazilian, the most interesting thing is that if you take this joint sino-brazilian document from may 2023, then from six points you can treat as programs... things only to the first point, which he talks about: the cessation of firing, the ban on

any provocations in any areas and parts, and the third is the beginning of a dialogue, a political dialogue, everything is there, if read the second, third, fourth, fifth and sixth points, expand, deepen, there is a question about humanitarian aid, medical... not service, accommodation of the civilian population and so on, that is, those things, they do not concern issues related to with the corresponding theater of war. and military actions, can such a document be considered a kind of plan? and these documents are written by those who wrote documents about the freezing of the situation in donbas since 2014, and about the current cessation of hostilities, planning that this will lead to

the end of the war, as it was in separate. cases in the balkans, as it was in the sino-vietnamese war, and cut me to pieces, but it blows from there. they fought for 11 days, then they laid down their weapons, stopped shooting, ran away, in general, the scenario of the korean war, when at least a million people were killed, and the war went to exhaustion, and began to fade away, fade away, and after that... they drew on some parallels the corresponding temporal border, yes, which has become, well, may almost be eternal. yes, mr. antin, just as you and i all these years insisted that the war in donbas should be frozen it is impossible, that is, to stop it in connection with the total, fragmentary termination, as it

is, the build already wrote about it, it is impossible, why? the war was initially of an existential nature, it is a war that has been going on for centuries, those who say that it determines the fate of the world are right in this war, so if you listen to what is being said from the rostrum of the un general assembly for the past three or four days, they are saying about a very clear thing, no matter how tragic the situation in the middle east is, but the future of the world in... is determined in the russian-ukrainian war, words that said gitanas neuseda, the president of lithuania, he was the first to say them, and i quoted him, he is absolutely right, what is happening in the russian-ukrainian war cannot be frozen or stopped, it can only be resolved by defeating the enemy, and can

only a coalition of forces of freedom should be provided. and democracy, only then can the moscow führer be stopped from implementing his plans. the idea that kyiv's healthy position can somehow be accepted by moscow is a self-delusion of those who harbor such plans. despite all that, that the world has been telling for a long time that beijing rules moscow, the world is wrong about this. and the main premise of the 12 -point chinese position and the so-called six points, of which only one can be called a programmatic point of the sino-brazilian proposals, cannot be implemented, because they are based on the false premise that the kremlin can

stop somewhere. any stoppage for the kremlin is only an escalation. to continue the war further. i don't know who else needs to be explained that in this situation it is an attempt to convince anyone in the fact that trade in the territory of ukraine can somehow satisfy the führer of moscow? well, didn't munich teach everyone? if next year russia increases the budget, military budget, budget by 40%. war, if expenditures on the military budget are three times higher than the total expenditures on education, health care, and all social services together, in three articles, isn't it clear that the level of militarization of the economy is the basis for the fact that the führer will wage an endless

war in the future, and his behavior in the current situation connected with these jerks. jerks and information leaks about the change in nuclear doctrine, isn't this proof that he actually envisions an eternal war, while bluffing with the use of nuclear weapons, bluffing that he will attack nuclear plants and so on, he understands very well that he has there is no ticket to travel in this direction, and therefore he blackmails with nuclear things. in fact, due to the militarization of the economy, the infinity of the war is being spun, hence the opposing side, ukraine and ukrainian allies, they either unite and... inflict the blow and defeat of the führer, or the topic of the drop-by-drop supply of military equipment,

ammunition and equipment to ukraine, is only one means, it is the so-called means of regulation, or management of the tension of the war, this is what we can talk about today, and what is happening in the current situation only proves that... that our partners adhere to the principle of managing the war process in matters of assistance to ukraine, and i was finally convinced of this when i left the meeting with donald trump, the prime minister of great britain, after the it is clear what a conversation, he threw the phrase that and... yes, but it is necessary to understand that there is only one means to influence the situation today, it is to manage the tension in the course of military

actions that are taking place today on the planet earth. this means that a phrase has been published that refers to the doctrinal approach of our partners not only to the russian-ukrainian war, including to the war in the middle east, to the war in africa. and here, not without realizing it, starmer's mouth announced a brilliant conclusion, the fact is that how the war in africa, because these are wagner's private armies and all other ar armies of russia, as well as before the war in the middle east, because the biggest beneficiary of this war is russia, i am not talking about the russian-ukrainian war, here it becomes clear that all these ... wars are actually started from one center. roman petrovich, well, there are people who cherish illusions, yes, they cherish certain hopes. we understand that there is

to be a second peace summit, yes, is there any summit dedicated to the issue of peace, and maybe the agenda will be to be formed with the help of beijing, with the help of china, as you very correctly noted, the chinese and brazilians first of all they insisted. in order to record the so -called realities on the ground, of course, here it is said that this should be done at our expense, the freezing at our expense, but the armed forces of ukraine worked to anticipate, and the presence of our fighters in the kursk region indicates that that the realities on the ground must also take this into account, that is, that part of the russian territory is under our control, we do not know how it will unfold military situation over the next... months, but the chinese are also giving very strong signals, you outlined some of them, there is also, i think, a strong chinese pressure on our european allies, yes,

because the conversation between beijing and brussels, i think we know much less about it than we would like, and accordingly, if the chinese will shape their agenda, as they see it, for example, the end of the war, what concerns china, then in... in the dialogue with europe, here europe does not ask and europe does not listen, here china asks and listens, why? after several investigations carried out by the european commission in recent years, it became clear that china is essentially littering the european market, and the european commission has adopted a number of decisions that limit the access of chinese goods to the european market, so here it is acting as a beggar. china is the first, the second. regarding the summits. summits and this whole idea is what is the gingerbread in this process. but

china, brussels, and washington do not take into account one very important thing: moscow will not be at any peace summit. all this is built on the fact that someone will manage to convince the moscow führer or his clique . to somehow be represented there, no, they will not be at this summit, and this has been stated more than once, because to come to this summit means entering into a certain procedure, this procedure is unacceptable for the kremlin. pay attention to the position of the kremlin from the point of view of even the high-level discussion of the un general assembly, they distance themselves from these processes, why? because the main... goal at the current stage of the kremlin is the transformation of brics, sho and all this international political garbage into torpedoes that destroy the big twenty.

the big seven, the united nations, then the council of europe, that is, in fact, today the kremlin's course is not only to destroy ukraine, it is part of the project of war against nato and against the civilized democratic world, against the freedom coalition, and when they talk about ukraine, for some reason they don't want to... look further, whether fuhrer moscow considers the destruction of ukraine as his ultimate goal. is this not true? no, it's not like that. ukraine, as the destroyed object in the kremlin's plans is part of its war with nato, with europe, with the democratic world. why? because this trio, beijing, moscow and

tehran. see their order imposed on the world, and this is clearly visible in the work of brics, where stratification is taking place today, because those who followed russia, china and iran, after iran appeared there, who essentially formulate an alternative world order, an alternative world currency, an alternative world finance, an alternative banking system, and so on. it doesn't just end the destruction of ukraine, that is what is missing in the current discussion and in the view of the victory plan that the ukrainian side is talking about, the actual geopolitical understanding of what course has been chosen by moscow, beijing, tehran, and what is happening from the point of view of what we are talking about you have said more than once, positioning, formation of the axis of evil and... and

formation of a coalition of democracy and freedom, so if you look, not in front of your nose, as so many are now analyzing the situation, they look and conclude that at the cost of ukrainian territory can be paid for some kind of stability, fig, will not work, the process will turn out exactly as it happened after munich, but i have a fear that part of the western elites will not follow the munich path, because... the war, the great existential war against ukraine and against the west - it is also about resources, so we understand, you very correctly noted, so simply looking at the russian military budget, which has grown by at least a third, and this is only the official part, so we do not know what they have planned for themselves there unofficially, accordingly, a similar calculation should be carried out in relation to the estimate of ukrainian expenses,

and in particular here it goes to... great regret, not only about financial, material and technical, military expenses, but also about human expenses. war is a pro-resource, in particular a mobilization resource, yes, we understand what the kremlin is betting on. they are ready to involve their lumpen more and more. we protect ukrainians, but we understand that the war is, well, extremely tough, i'll put it mildly. and accordingly, we need to... attract more resources from the west, and part of the elites, i repeat, they suffer from the munich syndrome, which should we do the right thing in order to increase our potential and resource to resist? mr. antin, our task is to do our job, we started by convincing the west that there is no civil war in ukraine. today we are talking about

providing ukraine with high-precision. long-range weapons, we already have hymars, abrams, challengers, well, through whom you can put anything, we did not start from scratch, we started from a negative position, today what i am talking about and what i spoke more than once, and we also talked about it in common broadcasts, that the west should form not only its political bloc, it should... form its military-political bloc, and this military-political bloc should join ukraine's side as soon as possible, because we must understand that we are fools you will not cure all of them, and some of them will be sick because ukraine or a part of ukraine can be settled. if he goes down this path, he will pay a very high price with millions of lives for his

recklessness. judgment, and i would even say idiocy.