don't eat it, don't look at them with dreamy eyes, don't dream about some of your business interests in china, it won't matter, throw this stupidity out of your head, like all the previous stupidities that you had in your head before the fiasco of february 24, 2022, so what needs to be done, and we can't figure it out, by the way, because we don't judge february 24, 2022 as a fiasco, because if we told ourselves that the course that was chosen in 2019, which led to victory over... the election of volodymyr zelensky ended in a fiasco, not by himself the president, this is not a question for zelensky, even, but for the supporters of this course, this is such a general national fiasco, we believed that we could come to an agreement with putin, we tried to negotiate with him, he was preparing to attack us at this time, if we were to evaluate it's like a national fiasco, then we could properly build our policy towards china, and if we think all the time that it just happened like that, because it happened, we are the victims, we are not here until... we don't have at all

nothing to do with the development of events that we all the time we are in political kindergarten, where we are not responsible for anything, even for our own stupidity, then we will make new mistakes, and china will take advantage of these mistakes, because china is a communist state with cynical leaders, they have a completely different system values ​​than the americans there or the europeans, they talk about you like kamela harris told donald trump about putin, so the chinese will definitely eat you for dinner, it will remain. another piece for dinner, but what could be the consequences of such a senseless policy in relation to china, which what, in the end, can ukraine get a negative result from this, well, in part, you have already answered the question, but in general, we must explain to the audience, in the end, how with russia, we saw what consequences we reaped not only...

there, if we speak it is about the 19th and 20th, and in general, in principle, after the restoration of independence, but china, what, what can we have at the end? and i will tell you that we should now be interested in stopping the export of technology from the people's republic of china to the russian federation, that is, we should to act with a united front by the united states and we should, on the contrary, force european countries to introduce secondary sanctions against the people's republic of china. what can we get if we do not do this, and if when the americans talk about the fact that the chinese are helping russia with armaments, then we pretend that we do not see or hear this, and the americans look somewhat hysterical in the eyes of even ukrainians, europeans, well, of course the americans will say that, well, they are just in a confrontation with china, what should we address to this attention, because you understand how many people in the world who want to make money from...

especially in european countries, you saw how they all go there, it's as if they are spread with honey, macron, scholz, melons, you can imagine what kind of lobby does china have in the world? i would say that now our entire information world and... and so on have been infiltrated by china the way he was infiltrated with russia, only with this difference that it could cost us statehood, so if we do nothing, we don't stop china, we don't introduce secondary sanctions, russia continues to build up its military-industrial complex, have new weapons , new shells, new anti-aircraft guns, new tanks, so she is fighting with us as much as she needs for the final liquidation of ukrainian statehood, but all we can have are interconnected things, first, second, we have a clear... to understand that we are not a country

of the global south and that the countries of the global south do not play any role in our survival at all, and that this is a game of numbers, some very childish game, how many countries support us, what is the difference, how many countries support you, it is important, how many countries give you money, it is important , how many countries give you weapons, not so much how many countries vote for you in the un, here is a simple example, how many countries vote in the un, now with the support of israel, not how many, however, not many, the majority votes against. there are many countries which abstain, for the support of israel, only a few countries in the organization of the united nations vote, right? how did this vote help hassan nastraliya, you don't know? we keep fighting for this resolution of the un general assembly session as if it matters in terms of our actual survival. but these countries will vote for our support, even when russian troops are stationed in uzhhorodka, it does not matter. our task is to ensure that there are no troops there, if even us. 60% of the countries of the global south will not be

to support, even 80, is a problem for the countries of the global south, if they will vote conditionally against us. saying, kazakhstan or azerbaijan or turkey, that they will change their position, well, for god's sake, they will not supply us with something there, some yurts, they will not supply inviolability, some humanitarian goods, well , for god's sake, it is better, of course, let it be supplied, but we we will do without it, but without weapons, without missiles, without patriots, we will not do without, we will simply die, we should not just call things our own... for us, diplomacy in war has zero meaning, itself the idea that all the countries of the world will gather and tell putin that he got out of ukraine has nothing to do with reality, because putin is the president of a nuclear country, he spat on all these countries, combined, he only understands the language of the power of economic exhaustion, and

we, with our illusions of a foreign policy nature, i would say not professionalism, actually give china the opportunity to be where it is... to create alternative plans, we always wanted to lure this china to this peace forum, remember? as if it would it make any difference, well, vanya would come there, well, by the way, a good illustration, here vani came to the meeting of the un security council, which was attended by zelensky, came, came, spoke, spoke, what has changed, well, he would come he would go to this peace forum, well, he would speak there too, he would leave his sino-brazilian plan for... he would show zelensky the hand of president of switzerland and go, what would change from his presence, nothing, except for some of our satisfaction, which we still have china is in the collection, well, it's not cars to collect, i say again, i don't see anything

bad thing about the peace forum, i always said that the peace forum from the point of view of diplomatic support of ukraine is an important thing, that we will play our role on the international arena as a victim of aggression, but then let's not mix it up. with the end of the war, i only mean this, it has nothing to do with each other, and about nasrallah, and we, you already screwed up, and you already mentioned, nasrallah, you already mentioned about about hassan nasrallah, he actually became a target attack, eliminated, like the absolute majority of hezbollah leaders, in particular... actually, in fact , over the past few days, we have observed hundreds of israeli strikes on the targets of ezbola in the territory of lebanon, and today it was officially confirmed that hassan nasrallah was eliminated by one and one of

the strikes on these targets the projects mr. vitaly, can we say that hezbollah is over? and in fact it will continue to act, it will continue to take some actions against israel, because in fact we have witnessed a very effective, fast, i would say lightning-fast operation of the state of israel against here is this de facto terrorist organization of hezbollah, when practically all the leaders have been liquidated. both of the highest echelon and of the middle echelon, well, not everyone should say that i, as far as i understand, this is the head of the executive committee of hachem sophia din, he is alive, he can become the new head of the organization, because in such an organization

there is always someone, but after, but after such devastating strikes, does this organization have a future, or will we see a de-escalation in the north of israel and we will see that... its influence on the territory of lebanon begins fall sharply? well, look, this organization, it exists precisely because there is a radicalized shiite population in lebanon, just as hamas exists because there is a radicalized palestinian population in the gaza strip. as long as such organizations have a social basis and have the money that iran gives, they will of course be founded. another issue is combat resources. in principle, let's think about it, hassan nasrallah became the head of this organization. 1992, so how many years have passed, well 32 years, or 33, as you think, during this time the israeli the special services had the opportunity to eliminate him, well, in principle, and why not, well, but they

did not do it, although i think that there were much easier options for eliminating hasan nastrala than hitting this bunker with these famous bombs that will win to break through the bunker. the problem is that there have always been certain red lines in the middle east that allowed us to live in conditions of, i would say, conflict management. after october 7, 2023 , these lines, they are destroyed, and therefore everything happens in completely new conditions, and therefore no one knows what will happen tomorrow, and i can't tell you that hezbollah will cease to exist there, or that it will de-escalate the situation, i think it can de-escalate the situation only for one reason, if hizbullah definitely does not have . control center and arsenals for attacks on israel, if it turns out that the death of the leaders

will not be greatly affected by this, then there will be an israeli ground operation in lebanon. israel does all this with one really real goal. he does not want to stretch the front in a situation where he cannot end the war gas sector. when all these goals of ending the war in the gas sector, they move from week to week. because there is no peace agreement, no appeasement, no release of hostages, none of that, and we are already approaching october 7, 2024, there are only a few days left, it is a year of war, for the near east it is not just a lot, it is a lot, a year active hostilities, as you understand, and israel as a state has never existed in such a situation, we do not even know how it will continue to exist, how it will affect our security. on the readiness of the israelis themselves to be in

this country, people are used to the fact that it is on their readiness to repatriate to israel, a different week happens, that they are safe, that just such a clash of the army, everything stops, here people understand that they will have to to live like ukrainians for years, and think about it, netanyahu is doing all this because he wants to return people to the north, to hiryat shmana. metulu and other cities and settlements, all these people, they became internal refugees, small countries. and now imagine that you are from telavi to the keel guys, how much is 2.5 hours to drive there, maybe less, and you can’t go home, it’s not the distance between donetsk and kyiv or from kharkiv to kyiv, it’s the distance from the white church to kyiv, relatively speaking, well, well, a white church, well, cherkas, no cherkas - it's even too much, probably still a white church. imagine that you have a house in the white church, and you are somewhere in

an asylum in telyavu or in a shelter in kyiv, and you cannot go to the white church, how do you feel, how safe do you feel in such a country, we have here simply a large territory, a person can leave kharkov, which is under fire, if he feels in danger, go to kyiv or ternopil, and it may not be safer there, but it is a long distance, you travel a long distance, here you do not pass anything, well, i do not i know... how can i explain it, well, at one time i used to go to tel aviv from skiria chmanoy there during the day, going back and forth when i needed to, and when i lived next to kiriya chmanoy for a month, i was tired very well, i just imagine, well, no, well i think our viewers can imagine it if we let's take one region at a time, let's assume kyiv region or zhytomyr region or there and imagine how far we go from the border there from zhytomyr region and there to the white church or to dore'.

that you still need to understand one important thing, that you live in this kyiv region, but if you go to a conventional district in this region, you can be killed there, you should avoid this district, because there are people living there who ready to kill you, in the literal sense of the word, not to say anything bad to you, but just to ... kill you, and you know what in in principle, you are guaranteed safety in such conditions, but now it is difficult to say, so of course the israeli government is making efforts, but i repeat again that since all these red lines are destroyed, i do not know how these efforts will end, to tell you honestly, that is, of course, a strike on hassan nastrali is a serious crossing of all the red lines that existed in israel's relations with these proxy armies of iran, now you are absolutely right, mr. andriy. depends on how much you

understand their military potential, if this military potential is not there, if they have to now rebuild their entire organizational nature, military potential, if the influence of hezbollah in lebanon is reduced, it is a completely different story, because then they will even think about the sector... gaza, because they are all time saw that they should besiege israel, and yes, if they don't really have the resources, that's the same formula that i suggested to you when we talked about russia, if iran doesn't have the resources. and on the restoration and maintenance of these proxy armies, iran will have to think at least about the pause, about the recovery of their forces and about political opportunities and so on, and you understand that hezbollah is also a big social donor, it is an organization that distributed

money to the poor people of lebanon, shitsky, so these people do not understand at all how they will live because they are used to it. with the help of hezbollah, that is, hezbollah, on the one hand, turned lebanon into a state in which there is no money, no jobs and prospects, no political anything, you know that there has been no president for 600 days, and here it is now one of the lebanese politicians, who, of course, like everyone else, expressed incredible regret over the death of such a wonderful patriot as hassan nasrallah, he said: our answer to the assassination of nasrallah should be the election of the president of lebanon, and nasrallah did everything possible. so that there is no president of lebanon, that was his idea, why is there a president of lebanon, if there is no president of lebanon, then who is the real leader of lebanon? hassan nasrallah, what about the government of lebanon, we are talking there, now there will be a meeting of the government, and what is the significance of the meeting government, when these ministers do not have any functions, they did not have, at least until today, when there are fewer servicemen in the lebanese army than in the army of hezbollah,

you understand, that is, they led to the degeneration of the entire state, once to the point that the people of another.. confessions, lebanese christians, sunnis, muslims, druze, in this state were actually subject to their influence and are now forced to express false regret for the death of a person whom they all hate, this must also be understood, hated, but they are afraid. to say this because they are hostages, in fact the entire population of iran is not shia, they are hostages of this terrorist gang, and the moderate shia are even more hostages, because they are afraid to say the word, lest they be killed, here is the speaker of the lebanese parliament on bigbed , he is the leader of another shiite party, amal, but the problem is that he was the leader of this amal all his life, and hezbollah came after the radical forces from that party left the picture, that is , they are the schismatics of his party, he hates them , but is forced to say that he suffers greatly from about the fact that the bitch, whom he himself

expelled from his party, was killed by an israeli rocket, here is the whole story from livano. so we'll see how this all plays out, it's a very complex story and we see the israeli government going to desperate lengths to try not to globalize this war in the middle east. i don't know what he will succeed in, especially as you can see that there is still an arab influence, we were talking about the session of the un general assembly, and you know that at the session of the un general assembly saudi arabia, here we were talking about what engaged in china and brazil, and saudi arabia, which china and brazil want to invite. of this platform of friends, it is creating another coalition, a coalition for a two-party solution to the middle east problem, in this coalition it wants to involve as many countries as possible that will agree with the reality of the creation of a palestinian state, and now china and brazil are forced to exchange their friends of peace for participation this coalition, and this is also

a problem for israel, because you saw that... it cannot be said that israel now occupies such obvious positions in the international community, which would make it easy to feel good on the international stage, no, it does not, and this is also a new situation for israel, when it does not enjoy obvious support even in the countries of the west, not that there is in the countries of the global south, that's how it is, but what what is the position of the three states that i will name, it is clear that iran is, and what iran can actually do, because... there have been repeated threats from the vice president of iran, we see that there is yet another announcement of some kind of revenge , once again they are telling that israel will end there, well, we are scarecrows already we know, we still haven't heard the turkish position, but maybe we heard, maybe we heard,

we heard, erdoğan condemned israel, maybe i didn't hear, because erdoğan, i heard, i saw erdoğan's speech. we remember the howl that arose after the actual operation against hamas against terrorists began, and what erdogan was doing there, and in turkey, what rallies were held, and, by the way, about china, which is interesting, about china, china, under wangi, about whom we talk a lot today, said that china strongly supports lebanon in... its of security, well, this is a more cautious statement than erdogan's, but it must be said that there is also france. which is also interested in the fact that there is no war in lebanon, because france has special interests in lebanon, and it considers

itself responsible for the security of lebanon, as a former metropolis, and israel also has to reckon with this, that is, of course, no one in french politicians do not support hezbollah, but one way or another, the lebanese theme is always used in the french domestic political context. even you know that melenchon, he came to beirut as a sign of solidarity with lebanon, and all this is also seen by his political opponent there, because you understand that many french voters are people of arab origin, which means that they immediately find themselves in mélenchon's pocket after such visits, so of course i will not be in this situation even to hide that it seems to me that the french are now too, well, two minutes ago. the minister of foreign affairs of france called for an immediate end to israeli airstrikes on iran, do you understand? we just started talking about it, he already

made this statement synchronously with my thoughts about france, and this must also be realized, so of course turkey will not just support lebanon, it will support hezbollah, but russia will. iran, iran will support hezbollah, and there are countries that will support lebanon and try to restore stability there, this is primarily, as we understand it, what is the position, what is the position of the united states of america in this case, the united states is trying to pretend that it does not have nothing to do with what's going on they do not want to take responsibility, minister of defense. lloyd austin of the united states stated that he learned about the polivan raid from israeli defense minister ivan gallant when the raid was already

underway, and no one informed him before that, that is, the united states does not support israel, does not condemn it, and in fact does not take such a position , not applying one's own role in this. history, that is, in fact , there are no americans among the critics of israel, there are russians, as you know, because, i don't know if you saw the statement from moscow, which was after the death they screwed up, but this is also quite an important statement, in fact, which condemns israel, here it is... absolutely clearly in the statement of the ministry of foreign affairs of russia , it is said that moscow strongly condemns the latest political killing carried out by israel and

insists that israel stop military actions, well, it's like support, and by the way, russian propaganda essentially stands on the positions of hezbollah, today i specifically inspected russian military personnel, russian propagandists there. all these all nightingales and so on, and there, if not they talk about it directly, then indirectly they talk about the fact that it is terror, about what is happening in the world, and you blame russia there for some reason and so on and the like, that is, in fact, in fact, maybe not so expressed , but russia clearly demonstrates whose side it is on, of course, and it is obvious that... russia is on the side of iran first of all, but now it is very important to understand how iran will really act, because in principle i absolutely agree with

those observers who say that the elimination of hasan is stupid, it is a direct blow precisely in iran, you see, that was not the case with hamas, hamas is an organization that iran could always put under the knife, so to speak, it is a sunni organization, these are people who were simply fed by... these iranians, and they could, in principle, use them to destabilize israel, the verdict with serhiy rudenko, from now on in a new two-hour format, even more analytics, even more important topics, even more top topics... foreign experts, inclusion from abroad, about ukraine, the world, the front, society, and also feedback, you you can express your opinion on a bad day with

the help of a telephone survey in read and tune in to the verdict with serhiy rudenko from tuesday to friday from 8 to 10 p.m. vasyl zima's big broadcast. two hours of air time, two hours of your time, two hours to learn about the war and what the world is about. two hours to keep up with economic and sports news. two hours in the company of favorite presenters, presenters who have become like family to many, as well as distinguished guests of the studio. events of the day in two hours, vasyl zima's big broadcast, a project for the intelligent and those who care, in the evening over espresso. glory to ukraine, dear tv viewers, on espresso tv channel, studio zahid program, we will analyze the most important events of this week, there are a lot of them,

first of all, of course, we will talk. about the visit of the president of ukraine volodymyr zelenskyi to the united states of america and about his meetings with representatives of the american, not only the american establishment. at the same time , extremely alarming, dangerous signals are coming from the kremlin. in russia, they changed the nuclear one doctrine, in particular, by lowering the threshold for the use of nuclear weapons. we will talk about this and other things with the iconic ukrainian politician and diplomat roman bezsmertny. roman bezsmertnyi, the iconic ukrainian, will now be on the air of the tv channel. politician and diplomat. glory to ukraine, roman petrovych. glad to see you. glory to the heroes. good afternoon, mr. antin. i would like to ask you right away what in your opinion has happened now and what we have finally reached in the so-called dry residue. yes, because in parallel with the visit of president zelensky to the united states, the kremlin immediately threw out a change in its nuclear strategic doctrine. we understand why

the kremlin actually did it, right? because... the issue of increasing american aid and certain permits, but you have a word, the topic of the next, let's say, nuclear blackmail, is a matter of absolutely informational order, and i am here calling on those who want to deeply understand the basics of russia's nuclear policy in the field of nuclear deterrence, which were adopted in 2020. there, please pay attention to the 19th point of this document, there are four conditions for the use of nuclear weapons, four, so the bottom condition says that nuclear weapons can be used if russia is attacked by a non-nuclear state, but at the same time there is a threat of liquidation of russian statehood, so

this point is added in... a quote that sounds like this: either this state carries out an attack on its own, or with the help of a nuclear state, that is, this case is like this, liquid soap or solid soap, well, in principle, it does not change the essence of the problem, moreover, experts, broadcasters they will say that it even narrows, because now we are not just talking about a nuclear-free state, we are talking about a state. which is supported by a nuclear state, but the point here is not what is written in the document, it is a clear informational throw at washington, and here is this trove of information, on the one hand, ah-ah, the position of ukraine and the request for the provision of high-precision and long-range weapons, and on the other hand, the change in nuclear doctrine, and it's kind of an information seesaw, i would immediately cut it

off... put it aside, because it's just a bluff, and a long time ago, everyone was fine understand that the document in question is a kind of doctrinal thing, and in this case, when making changes to this paragraph or this insert in the paragraph, it absolutely does not change the legal basis for the application of a nuclear state, so let's put this package aside side, moreover, it is also interesting that a lot has been said on this topic, but the final version has not been made public. yes, yes, and here i would like to agree with you, well done, roman petrovich, so we understand that what putin announced may differ from what will be written, yes, and these can be, as the classics say, two big differences. of course, that's why it's too early to talk about anything here, although i once again...