well, what do we have in the end, how do people react to it and what do they think about it? well, they react to it in the same way as they reacted to all the previous ones, because i repeat once again, nothing new, all this has already been heard 100 million times, and the fact that something was written somewhere in some pocketbook in russia does not change anything critically, more moreover, it must be understood that some weapons are provided to ukraine, they are not provided, as a rule, this is not determined by all the rhetorical techniques used by russia, but this is precisely the rhetorical technique, write in some pieces of paper in russia, something else, what there was no objective situation, what is there intelligence, something is written there by the president of the united states and european leaders, or they themselves do it there in view of their voters, and this is actually always the main argument. and

not that putin went on the air, said that he would rewrite something, so nothing so special, i say again, did not happen, and finally, the funniest thing is that in all this they can be completely incomprehensible to the united states, because well, in the united states, well , in principle, it is immediately written in them that yes they can use their nuclear weapons, it was written a long time ago, and when the russians are now telling with such pomp, how did they finally write something like that. well, it's not that it's not serious, it's even funny in some places. you are satisfied, nuclear our professor. olga, i will say so. in fact, there is nothing revolutionary about what happened yesterday. we did what the united states of america did back in 1961. to be honest, i don't understand their complaints, they are always themselves.

they said with a smile at all meetings: you have a cave-like attitude to nuclear weapons, but what extended deterrence do we have, how many doctrines, how many concepts? well, now you will receive your concepts in a mirror version. to be fair, there are still no complaints from washington, just as there are no official comments. petty political leaders. i would say political scientists. swings the nuclear club, swings it again, if the west doesn't hear it, then no one else will, the west hasn't heard it, let's be honest , let's admit it, i didn't hear it, i didn't hear it enough that, well, you see, they're crying already , how come , maybe they are there, maybe not yet woke up, maybe because of this they didn't have time to write how they are afraid of us, all russians are whining now. propagandists, no,

they woke up a long time ago, because the most interesting thing is that they basically wrote all this delusion in advance, so that they would have time for zelenskyi’s meeting with biden and it was specifically said in the evening, not for the russians, which is typical, but for the fact that there , where it is evening in russia, there is morning in the united states, so that one day in the morning this news in the united states... in the united states, so that it is not the first, so that had time to find out and react but somehow the reaction turned out to be so sluggish that you see, skabieva directly, that's all sadness in her, sadness, oh my god, they didn't hear, they didn't hear, what to do, my mother, so they heard, they heard, in fact, moreover, well for example, the well-known minister of defense of germany pistorius managed to react and even. somehow,

i would say, reacted very clearly. i want to say what i said before, this is part of vladimir putin's toolkit. my role and our role is not to be the mouthpiece and distributor of his threats. it's not even worth commenting on. tomorrow will be something else. we are sticking to our course, we are doing what we think is necessary to make it clear that nato stands by its position, and if it comes up with something else, let it spread it in its own way. that is, there will be no discussion of any of these threats , because they were treated as they were treated, that is, as for another explosion of russian propaganda, and what can be said about what they wanted with these threats in general, but whether they will really strike now, well, this is also of interest to skabiev , she is very worried, what if drones will fly, what? to do

, and here it turns out that it is not known what to do, because they really hope that somehow such insecurity will probably scare them, and if it is not confidence that does not scare them, well, i don’t know, let them... insecurities still scare them, the answers to these questions it is important, this is a question of interpretation, the president once again formulated an existential threat to the existence of the russian federation, but at the same time said that when we see a swarm of drones, it is already a danger, is it a danger or a conventional threat, we use nuclear a bomb? we creatively used the american experience, we began to contain the unknown, in them it is called to contain the unknown, let the enemy think that we are, he does not know how we will perceive a swarm of drones, whether the attack

is nuclear or not nuclear, that is, 147 drones at the beginning of september attacked russia, that's an excuse, and you guys in washington think like us... actually this deterrence by obscurity works both ways, so what else let's see who will deter whom with the unknown, for example, such unknown, and where will the ukrainian drone fly again, it's the unknown, it's true, suddenly he will fly somewhere so that i don't know, and it will be too late to stop him, everything happens, but it's not worth, you shouldn't play in the unknown too much, because i repeat once again, it works in both sides of this unknown, well, you know, after all, it is clear that drones are exactly pain, white, some kind of deep, which does not

leave, and again that’s why it’s a question, after all anyway, what to do with drones, fly? 10 drones, three missiles, four makes no difference. we do not say how many have fly in our direction, we say that they do not fly in our direction. the assessment, of course, will be made by our supreme commander and what the answer will be, but all this will happen very quickly and no one will escape responsibility. and if they fly in at night without pilots, what will you say, and we will not give an answer. i will not say so. and i'll tell you what will happen, when the drones will fly at night, and they won't tell anything about it, they'll just pretend that it didn't happen, well, just like it happened in all other cases, that's all there will be, that's why this is, you know, brandishing and inciting, it is usually aimed at

somehow calming down this, you know, russian globinarian, who is sitting inside himself in such glimmering, oh, oh, notorious panties. in front of the tv and shouts: "let's hit ukraine, kiev, somewhere else with a nuke, where is our president, where is our great putin, why did he do it again without a nuke, without a rod, let him wave a nuke." well, here is the answer to that, come on, so we rewrote the doctrine, you know, this is nuclear escalation, this is very serious, and there are a lot of such people, yes, it's serious, that's all, that's basically the end of this circus, because what's going to happen next... we're just flying in again, flying in, silently, somewhere around this story will continue, i repeat once again, to the real situation with the provision of weapons, it has a minimal effect, in fact, because it is affected by a completely different intelligence and the presence of the weapon itself,

strangely enough, and the presence of political will, which does not depend on the cries of russian propaganda at all, but you know, there is more... one more point, of course, what is there some drones will fly over, it's scary, but there are weapons that are even scarier, i'll even say more, drones are not scary, drone wreckage, after drones crash, then wreckage, wreckage is scary, the two most scary words, crash and wreckage, drone wreckage, absolutely. and you know, in this russian doctrine, there is not a word about fragments in it, just none, what to do, we will work with fragments, as always, we will

maintain our tradition, work in russia with fragments and that’s it, this is a wonderful way out, well and once they arrive... wreckage, which in general, there are no questions, i don’t think there are any, well, if you go by the documents, as they like to do, we signed the documents here, there are no fragments in the documents, such documents and there will be no fragments, well... we will work with fragments, well, that’s why we will finish for now with these cries, and there is another topic that i will not develop very much, it is trump's statements that ukraine is once again interfering in the elections in the united states, it should be remembered that the cries are not new for trump, that's right, trump in in 2016 , he shouted that poroshenko was interfering in the elections. in the united states, now now he shouts that zelensky is interfering in the elections in

the united states, and here, i would say, the problem is more with the trap than with us. of course, this is very bad for us, in the sense that any scandal is very bad for us, we depend on the help of the united states, we depend on their public opinion, and we always have to be, to put it mildly, careful about that , what we do about the united states. but there are cases when, you know, it is very difficult to fix something very much, because trump took as the basis of his election program, what he has to force ukraine capitulate to russia, he sees putin as his main partner, and, unfortunately, we will not change that, trump, when he comes to power, will be a problem for us. in any case, if he becomes president, most likely we will have to think, and we have to think

now, how to fight without american support, is it possible like this, is it really possible, can it be avoided like this if trump does not become president, this is the only option, and while all this is happening, all these screams, well, we need to treat them more calmly, i i believe, consider that an election campaign is underway. so hysterical in the united states, they are trying to use the ukrainian theme ukraine in this election campaign, can we really do something about it? in fact, no, and in fact it is also necessary to understand that the biggest part of this story is russian propaganda, for which trump is also very profitable, and all this hype is very profitable, i would say more, most likely it is to make all these conversations about ukraine the main one the topic of the election campaign. exactly advised trump it's the russians, and that's why, you know, at the same time, they're

very interested in how they discuss it, i'll just give a little, maybe something like this, because it's very revealing, when you know, they say, well, in principle, it's such a scoundrel, well, but our scoundrel, that's how it looks, well, let's listen, come on, what trump says, who still managed to do, sounds much smarter. biden and kamala got us into a war in ukraine, and now they can't get us out of it. i watched him: we will win, we will win, he repeats it for three years now, every time zelensky comes to the usa, he leaves with hundreds of billions of dollars. i think he's a great trader in the world, but we're going to be stuck in this war until i 'm president and i'm going to deal with it, i'm going to negotiate. i'll find a way out, we have to go. biden says we won't go. until

we win, what if they win, that's what they do, they wage wars. but we gave them almost 300 billion dollars, and you know what europe gave them. they are the same size as us. if you add up all the countries combined, their economies are very close to our size. and they gave only a small part of this number, a very small, very small part. sure, to be honest, not sure at all, kidding, trump goes on with his usual slogans, the other side shouts, he keeps lying, that's all they can say, and it's unfortunately true, trump lies a lot, but well, we love him not for that, and we voted for him not for that, it is believed that we elected him last time. that's great, trump lies, but he talks so smart. and in general, we don't love him because he protects. what can i say, there is only one conclusion from this.

in fact, trump adopted this, you know, as an electoral technology, he adopted the electoral technology that we will stop aid to ukraine, i promise you, because it seems to be beneficial for america. and here there is only one answer to this: if trump loses, he will lose precisely because of that. that he said that aid to ukraine should be stopped and that we should be friends with russia. this will be the answer then to this whole story. if he wins, that means the voters of the united states supported to support putin, that's it, it's very simple, yes, this is the reality, this is real politics, and the republican party's view of helping us will change to helping us only if trump loses, because it will show that his

slogans about not needing to help ukraine are deeply flawed, and the voters are american. they are not supported, i will say more, if trump loses, then the democratic party will help us much more, because it will see that the aid to ukraine is rewarded, it gives additional electoral votes, and again this is the reality, and only the elections in the united states will show what the real position of the american people is now, we depend on it, first of all, not on flight. not from trump, not even from the democrats, we depend on the position of the american people, and it is precisely this position that we need to support in every way, well somehow, we need to work more directly with the american people, everyone who can, who can talk to the american people, who can do something it is interesting to offer the americans, we should

pay attention to this, but for now, sorry, not to these all the statements that trump and his ... company that, again, i repeat, believe that this is such an election technology. so , see you. from now on in a new two-hour format, even more analytics, even more important topics, even more top guests, and even more feedback. you can express your opinion on the bad day with a phone survey. verdict with serhiy rudeku. from tuesday to friday from 20 to 22 here and left. vladyslav hnatenko has been working as a rescuer in the poltava part of the state emergency service for more than 10 years, says, in childhood he never dreamed of such a job, but after serving in the army he decided to devote himself to saving people. apparently, this profession found me, and i did not find it, it is

a job in which there are no holidays or days. birthdays, friends, all your days fall out, you go out, well, to the fact that there are reserves, accidents, meetings, well, that is, your schedule is abnormal. for a rescuer, first of all, physical endurance and preparation are important, because a complete set of equipment weighs tens of kilograms. clamps are quite, quite a heavy thing, that is, if there is no health, not for a long time you will work with it, also for... work in an environment unsuitable for breathing, there are such devices, also weighing 15 kg, a mask and you can breathe for an hour. working in a team with experienced colleagues is important for a young rescuer, vladyslav adds. on the first outings, the elders provided moral support and covered physically.

the main thing, it will always be later, is experience. that's it, of course. the ability to make quick decisions in critical conditions, courage there, physical endurance, because it is not there, well, the event can be there from three minutes there then yes, the last day was all, you are already changing for events. in the absence of calls, the work schedule in the state emergency service is filled with classes and training, says vladyslav hnatenko. there is a combat deployment, there are many sleeves. installing a car on a reservoir, extinguishing a fire, a conventional one, an electric car, for example, there is someone who conducts classes, he gives more water there, you do all this as part of the unit, and in the last two years , even more work has fallen on the shoulders of rescuers, except for fires, accidents or cataclysms, emergency services workers eliminate

the consequences of russian shelling, evacuate civilians and carry out search and rescue operations, and that's exactly what you are... well, it's very rare and on such and such a scale, when hundreds of tons are transported there per day and there are almost a lot there you sort through half of it by hand, so it is probably physically more difficult. during the two years of the full-scale invasion, rescuers of ukraine eliminated more than 17...thousand fires that arose as a result enemy shelling, more than 1,300 lives were saved from the rubble. during this time, two workers the state emergency service was awarded the title of hero of ukraine. anna morozova, bohdan. skorov from poltava for the espresso tv channel. it is about politics

about the world. maria gurska, journalist of the ukrainian tv channel and eu sister portal. and pavel koval, chairman of the committee on foreign affairs of the polish sejm and chairman of the council for cooperation with ukraine. congratulations. good day in poland, there is an ongoing battle with scuttles. the fight against the consequences of floods continues in poland. he suffered the most. south-western voivodships. in some cities, the situation was also critical week discussions also took place in the polish diet, debates between the government and the opposition. what does the situation look like at the moment and how big are the consequences of the disaster? negative? the fight against halves requires quick changes to some laws. therefore, of course, it causes discussions in the diet. also, it's obviously a struggle for many people, especially the opposition. it's also a political issue, so they're trying to make some political capital by criticizing the government, but i think the government did well in this exam. the point is that

the prime minister personally managed the operation to eliminate the consequences of the flood. he demonstrated two elements, i.e. personal leadership, when tusk said, i personally lead the action, study individual issues with help.

super-experienced in supporting ukrainians who are fighting and organizing support for the front. now they have used all this experience in providing crisis assistance to the civil protection organization during the flood. all together , it worked very well and was reinforced by a nationwide campaign of regions that were not affected by the elements, such as, for example, subcarpathia. i am well aware of this, although subcarpathia itself experiences floods from time to time, and this time the disaster bypassed the region, but starting with non-governmental organizations. expertly, the best experts from the administration of the podkarpackie voivodeship went to support people in the flooded counties

of lower silesia, these are a few elements, they are key to describe what the fight against floods looks like. and i would just like to add that the ukrainian organization euromaidan warsaw actively participated, organized support for flood victims under the name you to us, we to you, a guide to ukrainians in february 2000, ukrainians remember how poland opened its doors to us in february 22, and now we provide help to poles who need it, we go, rescue, collect money and things for the victims, such mutual acts of humanity very important, i wrote this week. log for the eu sister portal, about how in 97, during the previous great polish flood, the so- called flood of the century, i played the violin as a girl in the market square in krakow, collecting

funds for the victims of the disaster. there is a reason in a way and the flood was in a sense greater in effects but less in rainfall, now more rainfall has fallen in a short time. the causes of the flood - this bologna front, as it seems to be... called, were similar, and yet the rainfall was a little less then, and people suffered more. the consequences of the flood were more catastrophic, especially when it comes to the large polish cities of wrocław and opole. there is one more important issue, the visit of a delegation from the parliament. another important event is the visit of a delegation from the ukrainian parliament to warsaw this week. in representatives of the crimean tatar mejlis, headed by mustafa dzhemilov, as well as the co-chairman, were in warsaw.

blacksmith. one of the topics discussed is the speech of the un, ukrainian politicians were received by pavel radoslov sikorskyi during the discussion in chatham house, which is closed, but someone leaked the details to the press. we are talking about a proposal to transfer crimea under the mandate of the un, and after 20 years to organize a referendum there. such a vision of the solution to the crimean issue worried ukrainians, if only it worried them.

of course, we talked about crimea, namely about the world's attitude to crimea, the main thing that needs to be understood now is the essence of russia's policy, that is, imperialism, and revisionism is added to this. russia wants the world to recognize at least one territorial change, and we want the world not to recognize any territorial change implemented by force, without the will of the people. and from this point of view, the crimean issue has 100 different dimensions, but this is the main one. every time you talk about crimea, you should say crimea is ukraine. of ukraine. of ukraine. and russia, by the way, also recognizes this. we see how the russians are transferring certain elements from crimea, for example, the black sea fleet to abkhazia, which they also illegally occupied, because this, to jest pojte części gruzji, ale vidze, że

spodzieją się, że... they have been talking about such a decision for a long time, in which autonomy involves their participation in various they do not have a majority in crimea, but the tatars are crimean governing bodies, and this is natural. crimea is the homeland of the tatars, the crimean tatar people from the very beginning advocated the integrity of ukraine. under no circumstances does he expect the borders to change when it comes to crimea.

polish interests. such that we should not change the borders by force, because this would be a precedent and a threat also for poland, so everything i think about this is clear, clear and i will simply add two things: first, absolutely definitely, crimea needs will invest more when it comes to the development of infrastructure, especially tourist infrastructure, secondly, crimea is the most obvious story of a typical russian historical lie, because the russians somehow managed to convince everyone in the world that crimea was once russian entered the crimea and bialystok. russians in crimea the russians entered the crimea. catherine ii never lived. crimea was never russian in any sense of the word. it is simple, like many other states and peoples.

thank you for these words, we are fighting for the freedom of crimea and its return to the ukrainian state. an important event this week is the visit of ukrainian president volodymyr zelenskyi to the united states. zelensky brought with him. the victory plan, which consists of three components: a greater number of weapons and the possibility of carrying out strikes with long-range weapons deep into russia, an increase in such a way of war for the kremlin and the parallel opening of nato's doors for ukraine. what do you think about the feasibility of this plan and how quickly it can be implemented? can he be impressed? let's see what jest w stanie jeszcze wydać.