many other states and peoples were part of the russian empire for some time, and then after the collapse of the empire, it became part of the ukrainian state, and this was recognized by everyone, including. thank you for these words, we are fighting for the freedom of crimea and its return to the ukrainian state. an important event this week is the visit of the president of ukraine, volodymyr zelenskyi. to the usa zelenskyi brought with him a victory plan, which consists of three components: a greater number of weapons and the possibility of striking with long-range weapons deep into russia, escalating the war in this way for the kremlin and simultaneously opening nato's door for ukraine. what do you think about the feasibility of this plan and how quickly it can be implemented? let's see what else

the current administration of the us president can do. this is a special moment. on the one hand, everything is easy, and that is why president zelensky is raising this debate, because this is the end of the term of office of joe biden, who is not running, so he can afford to do more, because his decisions will not have such an impact on public opinion, if suddenly will be contradictory. oh, the biden administration, too.

does not expand strongly enough. polish interests lie in the expansion of nato. will president zelenskyy be able to achieve anything during this period of the final campaign, a period in which the american president is called a "lame duck" or a lame duck. of course, talking about him in a figurative sense means that biden is no longer able to make long-term decisions, he does not feel public support, but this is the moment in which he is also open to certain solution because it already

trump may become president again, their meeting shows that president zelensky is trying to secure us security policy in central europe, which concerns ukraine, by playing two pianos at the same time. it is not so easy for trump, and especially for j.d. vance, his potential deputy. they did not like volodymyr zelenskyi's interview. they didn't like the interview, of course, but their approach to ending the war, as they now say, is simply dangerous because it deals with what everyone is worried about, which we also often talk about, namely, that somewhere in the background there is an inclination towards the principle of land for peace, in the case of russia the principle of land for peace will never work, because it is rather an incentive for another attack,

"land in exchange for peace in the case of russia is an encouragement to another attack, so to go..." in that direction is not worth it, but of course there is another aspect of the matter, and that is how mrs. garis, the current vice president, the presidential candidate , appeals to poles in this company, because poles are an important element, an important one by a group of polish americans, an important group of voters in pennsylvania, the election can be decided by pennsylvania, and by the way, there are also ukrainians there. ukrainians, who were mentioned by the president of ukraine volodymyr zelenskyi during the visit. what is known about these people's political preferences, how they might vote, and how important their voice and influence is. we know a little more

about polish voters, because we observe how they vote in other elections. i think they're split about half that much these days. voters sometimes change theirs too position, because it was visible, watching the last rounds of elections, how they influence polish politics and often change opinion. again, we know about polish voters in the us, because they vote in polish elections, there are several aspects of this issue that lead us to believe that the case is worth the candle, because it's about half and half right now, but in pennsylvania the 1% will be decisive , or maybe half a hundred. or maybe a few votes that will change the picture in all of pennsylvania, so this battle for polish and ukrainian voices, in my opinion, makes sense, although it is a very delicate game. americans don't like it when it's always very dangerous in the american political culture, somebody is overactive, trying

to influence their domestic situation, so it has to be done very carefully, although a lot of experts that i've met in the last few days, experts who know very well america, ukraine, poland, those who work at this crossroads of light. during debates addressed to poles and ukrainians. haris also supported the plan victories of volodymyr zelenskyi during his visit to the usa and their meeting. she openly said that it is very important and that action must be taken. and we see that her position is openly pro-ukrainian. that is, the

election campaign. this is an election campaign. i would say that this war has taught us, whether we're dealing with democrats or republicans, it's always fueled. your argumentation and pressure. america is still far away and some pressure is necessary on both republican and democrat politicians. also, it often happened that those who first seemed like an extremely difficult partner, like speaker johnson, then suddenly changed his position and accepted some argument. so i think it's a wise policy to appeal to both republicans and democrats. be careful with both teams, because some of the most unexpected things can happen. elections are going on, everyone is appealing and debating during the elections.

not a single soldier, but president zelensky is the best salesman in history, who makes dirty little attacks on america's favorite president, that is, trump himself. but this all. how to evaluate it? if you look analytically. who advises trump, what he has...

a businessman to say about someone that he is the best salesman in history, it only means that trump appreciates some of zelensky's talents, trump simply does not have real information about the state of affairs in ukraine, of course, on the one hand it's bad but if it is interpreted positively, it means that maybe his position will change when he will have access to the real facts, and someone will tell him what the situation really is, like some kind of situation, and also an important, important event was the visit the president of ukraine to a defense plant in pennsylvania, this was a signal, i liked it, it caused a scandal, and the speaker of the house of representatives johnson expressed a demand to release the ambassador of ukraine.

maybe and... not the most accurate, but it works in it's a powerful argument from our point of view he america, if we talk about trump, maybe

we're surprised by how little trump knows about ukraine, but they're all very focused now on a few states, where the elections will be decided, and trump is not very interested in ukraine at this stage. he says some general words, but what's important to them is what 's happening in pennsylvania, what's happening in north carolina, nevada, arizona, what 's happening in the rust belt, in those states where something can still happen to beat the competition. competition in such a way, yes, yes, yes, there is also probably in nevada in arizona. and this is what mr. is predicting, and how, in your opinion, zelensky's visit will work, which some experts call a mistake: to go to the usa at a time when a heated election campaign is underway. and we see that the trip really caused a real storm, but on the other hand, ukraine has no other choice, it has to knock on all doors, and every moment is appropriate for the protection of democracy in ukraine and in the world.

usa, i would say that this is inappropriate, but... a large part of ukrainian territories is temporarily occupied by russia, defense in the war continues, everything is at stake for you, zelenskyi's diplomatic bravado makes sense, president zelenskyi's diplomatic bravado, it makes sense. what to expect, too, what to expect from this visit, what will be the effect, will the meeting of volodymyr have an impact zelenskyi with donald trump on trump's position on ukraine. we will remind, trump said. that the usa should get out of the war in ukraine, we still have a vysof from the ukrainian case, i think that

we listen too much to any word that trump says. these statements are quite general, i have heard them a bit about everything outside the us, trump speaks in very general terms, his language and way of communication is extremely simple, this is the case even in domestic american matters. i think there is no point in analyzing all these theses. trump is simple knows little about ukraine, he makes general statements that there will be... a war, because saying that the war will end well for every voter is understandable to everyone, but there are no strategic points behind these statements, they are located in other places, the real politics of trump we we will only know if he wins the election, and before that we just have to take it as some kind of statements at rallies, in which, in which international issues play a minimal role and matter only 5%, but we also see putin watching for everything is sitting in the kremlin says: "we are expanding the number of cases in which russia can use nuclear

weapons." what do you think about it, how to react? as a reactionary. putin is scary, but you have to take him seriously, because he is scary, but he also has real tools. these threats are not a joke, but putin must always show determination and consequences, take him seriously and not be afraid. take him for granted, but don't be afraid of him. so will the authorization for long-range strikes on the territory of the russian federation be among the last decisions of biden western weapons from ukraine. ukrainians already use a significant amount of weapons, what biden will decide, i can't say, i don't want to make predictions here, it seems to me that simple matters should not be complicated, but from my side you can hear it clearly. ukrainians have the right to use weapons, and the only limitation may be international law. everything else is an artificial political barrier, through which

those who forbid something to ukrainians, de facto, take responsibility for the fate of this war. dawn of the cold war. the marshall plan economy program aid to european states after the second world war, and the marshall plan is not only history, it is the key to understanding how to turn the destroyed ukraine into a prosperous country. the marshall plan is a book that reveals the lessons of the past for the creators of ukraine's future. a book from the spirit and letter publishing house of the espresso library series. a story that inspires victory.

vasyl zema's big broadcast, my name is vasyl zema, this is big broadcast on the spresso tv channel, two hours of air time, two hours of your time, me and my colleagues will talk about most importantly, two hours to learn about the war, about the military, the front line, serhii zgurets and what the world is like, yuriy fizer is already

with me, and it's time to talk about what happened outside of ukraine, yuriy, good evening, two hours, to keep abreast of economic news. time to talk about money in wartime. oleksandr morshchevka is next to me and sports news. i invite yevhen pastukhov to the conversation. two hours in the company of your favorite presenters. about cultural news. alena chekchenina, our art viewer is ready to say good evening. leading that to many people, they have become similar. already next to me, ready to talk about the weather for this weekend. and also distinguished guests of the studio. mustafa dzhemilov, leader of the crimean tatar people. contact us. mr. mustafa, i congratulate you. good day events of the day in two hours. vasyl zima's big broadcast, a project for smart and caring people. espresso in the evening. get closer to victory, together with the central security service, the sbu. join one of the best special forces in the country. we are expanding and hiring. we invite

civilian specialists of various fields. experienced commanders will ensure your quality training and education. fill out the questionnaire and choose the direction where you can be most effective. we are waiting for you in the team of the central security service of the a-sbu. together we will write the history of victory. details on the official pages of the sbu. friends, my congratulations, today we will start not only with culture, but also with information hygiene, because firstly, the issue is relevant and important every week, and secondly, we have absolutely some wild case of yazalina gros, when everyone is at the beginning week, i will think, like all, almost all

of our colleagues in the media, in social networks, there was talk about the fact that they say the ministry of foreign affairs has already reached the point of appointing alina grossa as the official ambassador of ukrainian culture in new york, i think you have heard this news, well, i will tell you right away why it caused such, such a tumultuous reaction, because alina grossu, well , let's put it this way, is not the kind of singer that many people see as a suitable person for this position, and that's how the indignation went, and what is most unfortunate... for us, for me, that many media people wrote about it without checking the information, without sending a request to the ministry of foreign affairs, and that's why it happened everywhere, what, what is it. our state has already reached the point where it appoints anyone to such important positions to represent ukrainian culture, in such an important city, in such an important place, in such an important country, but

of course everything became clear quickly enough, if you look at the reaction of the ministry of foreign affairs, well, it is obvious that she was a little irritated, although we know that diplomats know how to hide their irritation, in particular, and... but let's hear, see, remind ourselves what the reaction of the ministry of foreign affairs was already in the evening, when it was throughout the day. we don't know where the information came from that singer alina grosu got a diplomatic post in new york. given the resonance of this information in zmi, we must officially clarify that alina grosu does not hold any full-time or part-time positions. in the system of bodies of the diplomatic service of ukraine regarding the performance of diplomatic or consular functions? somehow , well, many people who then began

to justify or explain why, why they perceived this information as reliable, they began to say: "listen, we well, we are already so used to some completely wild appointments that have been going on with us for a long enough time that we have simply gotten used to it. and we will not settle for absolutely anything, on the one hand, yes, there is a kind of such an explanation, but on the other hand, we must always understand that no matter what someone teaches us, we must always check the information, especially when it concerns us media workers and that's why it's our problem, of course, and i'll just say that the case is wild even for those, well, when you dive into it and understand who exactly appointed alina. in to new york as an ambassador of ukrainian culture, so it becomes a little motley, because she was really appointed, well, in a peculiar way, but

it is important to understand who exactly did it, it was done by a certain doctor sima karetnaya, now we can look at her, what kind of photos i took from her instagram, which she herself regularly posts there, the fact is... here she is now in a green jacket, the fact is that if you look at sima kakaretna's social networks, this is the same woman in red, who is in the video that published by alina grosu, stood with her on the stage and nominated her, did she offer to give her this position of ambassador of ukrainian culture, you see, mrs. sima is standing with another ambassador of culture from another country, if you look at her social networks, then you can see that she is a match. will give the impression that this lady just goes to many different events, takes pictures with different people, and photographs are taken, for example, against the background of something, for

example, we saw how she was against the background, behind the tribune took pictures, you know, i often see such people who, for example, like to take photos with different people celebrities, with well not so famous people, just more or less public. often they ask to take a joint photo with those they don't know at all, it's just that they think it's some more or less famous person, let me take a photo with them, and then we'll see how we can use it, and then we see in on the social networks of these people, there are some posts with the publication of this photo for absolute friendship with them, for example, they took a photo with svyatoslav vakarchuk, here a person can write: look, here i am, here is my friend, svyatoslav vakarchuk, we went somewhere there with him, he told me something, and then these people can create

some kind of public reputation for themselves in this way and continue to use it and enter some events, for example, and present themselves as some kind of official person and so on and so on, but here , of course, i saw such people, they are tolerated a little less here. than, for example, in the united states, where mrs. sima was invited, she even went on stage, and the fact that she announced alina grosa, the ambassador of ukrainian culture in to the united states, this, well, it means absolutely nothing, it's just some kind of half-freak act, yes, which is most likely at this party, and it was, it was such a reception of the mayor of new york, at his house, that it's nothing meant, but we have it all sorted out, let's... let's make it clearer to you what kind of a seven-carriage she is, let's listen to an excerpt from her letter, which she wrote to us, my

colleagues and i sent her several. questions with requests to explain, and what it was at all on this stage, she also confirmed that it was her did not give alina gros any official diplomatic status, but she simply believes that gros's music is so brilliant, so wonderful, that she is such a powerful singer, that it would simply be a crime not to appoint or offer her to be such an ambassador of ukrainian culture , because who else, who else but her? let's listen to how ms. sima introduces herself, and i'll say in advance that she lists a lot of regalia there, and we checked, and it's not true, at least in the un, she doesn't represent anything at all, and all the other positions - this, these are quite strange positions that exist in organizations that, for example, we and our film crew can just

create today, name there, for example, and give out some titles and introduce ourselves somewhere, it's about the same, but let's listen, how about dr. sima karetnaya speaks for herself. i am ambassador dr. sima kakaretneya, us chair for diplomacy and negotiations at the g100, and ambassador for human rights and sustainable development at the un economic and social council. i am also a certified expert in protection of health of the world health organization and a certified manager of biomedical research at harvard university. you know, the fact that we've all gotten into this kind of madness, it's, it's just horrible, it's all very shameful, we need to draw some conclusions from all of this because, you know, we 've had some for a long time, like pseudo-experts, yes, what constants... give

some kind of expertise, and then it turns out that they are not experts at all, and we remember the loud story with spartuk on saturday, we remember how they criticized various, for example, military, military, military experts, yes, who were very often called by our media, but now they stopped, because the military themselves began to speak, listen to who you call on the air, these people do not understand anything at all on what they say, remember, we also have... and oleksiy aristovych, who was he, he was not only an expert, he was an expert in everything, let's say, he also understood women's psychology, and he is a military man psychologist, military interpreter, and pilot, and anyone, yes, and for a long time, many people, including media people, believed what he was saying, i think that if aristovych said that he flew from mars with

an important mission to save ukraine. i'm sure that some people would believe that, regarding alina grosu, finally, closing this topic, i will say that she is quite a person, you know, now she certainly loves ukraine, but she obviously did not have such feelings before, she spent a lot of time in russia, in particular during the war, and we can note that she is at this party in new york was... with her husband or boyfriend, i don't know what to call it, whose name is roman polyansky, here he is in glasses, she is also standing, well, next to her, and roman polyansky, a russian actor, who is said to live in russia, he continues, and here you can imagine, he goes to parties, to events together with the ambassador of ukrainian culture in new york, what do you think, and alina in general.

rosu said different things, well, at least in the ukrainian tabloids, they wrote that they had parted ways, but as we can see, they probably didn't, it's a very strange situation, yes, and to the fact that we cannot even call roman polyansky a good russian, because he supports all these, well, russia in general as a country, a little more than even those good russians, who we often don't like, but... well, well, we can draw only one conclusion from this story: let's check the information better, let's not immediately believe what is possible, what we want to believe, what seems likely to us, especially if it is some kind of emotional or shocking information for us, and we want to either to be happy or to be indignant, well, it's one thing on the other hand, it is nice to be outraged, to write something to yourself in social networks.