of course objective circumstances, the biggest reservations are aimed at america, these are internal affairs, internal quarrels, misunderstandings between republicans and democrats and so on, now now we have passed the end of the fiscal year, the fiscal year, and now only now do we understand what the budget is left, because they just extended the budget until december so that there would not be a shutdown in october, but... however, also some programs that were included last year, you remember how long it took to include the aid budget for ukraine last year, we still not us had to wait for the activists or even the congressmen to understand after the remaining fiscal year, what programs were included for two years, for three years, which were urgent, ending on september 30. and what the administration and congress

could include in this extension, then this will be the most important thing for us in october, and what other help can we include, besides that president biden has not just announced, we understand, our understanding now is, that there is still money before the supplementary bill they plan to have in december, after the election, but a change. the most important thing for ukrainians is a change in policy regarding long-range weapons, i still think, and so i am already with a question from june, i don’t, i don’t think, there will be an important change right after the elections here in america, not only that this is a political matter, but just an understanding, when we can add another package, i don't think america would want it, as far as i understand. with friends in washington,

america does not want to change its policy specific to those distant weapons now, until the elections are over and we are already approaching the thousandth day a full-scale invasion, and they think then with a conversation with international partners, whether at the g20 or at another, because it is the same in november, only then will there be a change in policy in america. that is, in your opinion , such a decision will not be made at ramstein , so it would be a revolution for the whole world, but in fact, no one in washington thinks that at any meeting or press conference we will hear that there will be a change, everyone thinks , which is how we saw those attacks when they hit russian territory border, we will also feel the change.

missiles, about permission permission for strikes on we are again talking about the long-range territories of the occupying state, can we expect this permission even from the administration of joe biden, or do we still need to wait for january 20 to come and the new... president , the newly elected president has already gained his powers, this period, can joe biden use it conditionally there, november 6-7 and until january 20, in order to take some radical steps, i would say revolutionary steps for aid to ukraine, but actually in this last period of his presidential term, this is a very crazy period. such a golden period for us,

when the elections will come after november 5 until the inauguration after half of january, when the president still has the right to decide anything, but no one can vote against him, no one can remove him in that period, then we can do a lot do then, i i think, then i i thought before. what i think, not before november, but already after the elections , the president himself, he does not run for anyone, no one must vote for him or give him permission, he will be the president and this is the best period for him to change his mind, and we also know that the advisers of either former president trump or vice president gerest will be completely different from the president biden maybe there will be a change in january as well, but i would

think that biden has an opportunity to change his mind, it would be in the period that you planted everything between the elections and the inauguration, and we, mr. andrii. we are watching how, in fact, this visit coincided with elections and you too including already de facto this was confirmed by these controversies yes, this is this struggle, even to some extent such a fierce struggle between the two candidates, in particular the american analyst peter dickenson, he explains that trump's rhetoric has changed, i will remind you that initially trump allegedly from... all from the meeting with zelenskyi, and mike johnson, the speaker of the house of representatives, he sent such a rather undiplomatic letter to the president of ukraine demanding the release or recall of ms. markarova, the ambassador of ukraine to the united states

america, and we also remember this speech by mr. trump, where he spoke so incorrectly about ukraine, well... we will not mention it now, because there is really no time, but here is this sharp rhetoric, a change in rhetoric, which took place during the last two days of zelenskyi's stay there, why did trump still decide to meet, mr. dickenson actually explains this by the fact that the ukrainian and polish diaspora plays a big role during the elections, or rather on the day of the elections. times and it is clear that the same trump does not want, even after his eccentric such statements does not want to reject these votes, and i will remind you, there are hundreds of thousands, and maybe millions of votes, in your opinion, it is yes or no, whether

you can really confirm such a hypothesis, and how much, how much you liked it or did not like it. .. here is this meeting of zelensky with trump, how trump behaved there, support or not support of ukraine, after all? well, what started the week with, as you said, such an undiplomatic letter, it's completely against any protocol, and it came out again from the dark corners of the online, or tokar carson, who talked about it immediately, when president zelensky arrived. to america , carlson immediately began an attack against him on his online speeches to complain that he came to america, as well as some other such strange online stars from wild corners, but that it rose to the former president,

since he had raised conspiracy theories two weeks earlier about immigrants from haita, that they eat cats and dogs, from time to time this is logic. a former president who wants to change his mind, change his rhetoric online or in the media to bring attention back to him, and he did all this, most of the attention was on the former president, not on the direct meeting that was, we saw the live broadcast of the meeting of zelensky in the white house or the meeting with the vice president, all the talk in the press was about the former president trump and... and when he received this attention, we still saw that there was an approach to president trump's team through normal resources, that the request was that president zelensky would still like to have a meeting and so normality returned a little, but

regarding those who vote, you mentioned americans of ukrainian polish, any eastern or central european descent, i think... in general , their campaign for president trump has completely left those votes, but there will still be quite a few here who will vote for president trump from that background, i will still get, i would say 55 half and half who send me e-mails to our office or to mine privately, our, our community is divided as any community, and they are ready to vote for their own. on my thoughts for one candidate or another, but the campaign itself, i don't see that either president trump, nor this senator jay vance, who is a senator in the state of ohio, where there is a fairly large number of ukrainians, but to this day has not visited a single ukrainian

center, neither before he became a senator, nor after, and nothing wants to deal with such ethnic americans. we will follow. according to the situation, we will usually watch the elections in the usa, because it is very important for us to support our country, i am very grateful to you, mr. andriy. for taking the time to join our airwaves, see you next week. andriy dobryansky, the spokesman of the ukrainian congressional committee of the united states of america, was just on the live air of the espresso tv channel. i remind you about our survey, today it sounds as follows: are you satisfied with the results of zelenskyi's visit to the united states of america. if so, you can take your smartphones or phones absolutely. vote for free 0800 211 381, if not, 0800-211-382 and in 19 minutes we

will tally up the intermediate results, and for now we continue our live broadcast, and we already have the next ride, yes igor reiterovich, sir igor, good evening, political scientist, head of political and legal programs of the ukrainian center for social development, i congratulate you, glory to ukraine, glory to the heroes, congratulations, mr. igor, of course, let's start with those statements that come from the occupying state, there lavrov has a lot to say , of course he said, there is yet another nuclear blackmail from putin, lavov, and all these russian people, actually. during his speech at the un general assembly, foreign minister serhiy lavrov once again threatened

nuclear escalation. let's hear what he had to say. as for russia, a goal has been announced the task of her strategic defeat, almost as planned by london and washington in may 1945 , developing before completion. world war ii, an operation called the unthinkable, regarding the destruction of the soviet union. then it was kept a strict secret, and the current anglo-saxon strategists do not hide it. i will not talk here about the absurdity and danger of the very idea of ​​trying to fight to victory with a nuclear power, which is russia. at the same time, a few days ago, the president, the so-called... the president of russia, volodymyr putin, announced about the fact that they are actually changing the nuclear

doctrine, i think that the audience should no longer be told what they were talking about, well, another nuclear so-called scarecrow, but today putin's press secretary dmitry piskov said that it is not necessary to link ukrainian drones attacks with the actual possibility of nuclear response strikes, in particular on... against the background of the recent changes in this nuclear doctrine, which we just mentioned. so, mr. igor, here is such a constellation of statements, on the one hand, intimidation, on the other hand, we see a change in the nuclear doctrine, putin's scarecrows again. and then piskov declares that no, well, we will not use nuclear weapons. it is clear that every night ukrainian drones fly over russian facilities, strike... military facilities, in your opinion, this whole catavasia with

nuclear threats, what does it testify to, and is there really someone else in ukraine or in the west reacts to it and is afraid of such statements or actions. well , piskov's statement today is essentially the quintessence of this so-called nuclear doctrine of the russian federation in general, it is nothing more than words that, well, what they can... to change depending on the situation, some mythical red lines that they draw, but which they are not going to fulfill in any way, because they simply cannot do it, i mean precisely in the context of the russian-ukrainian war, because it is clear, what is the doctrine, it envisages a confrontation with a nuclear country and a response to some nuclear strikes there or the delivery of a preventive nuclear strike, because this is also laid down in the strategies that russia currently has, and what to do in... with ukraine, they still don't know, and that's why there is such a polarity of statements: lavrov says

one thing, then, that means, there putin says the second, and piskov finally, clearly referring to the same putin, says absolutely the third, because he is wonderful understands that no one will actually respond to drone attacks or missile attacks with nuclear weapons, because this is an impossible story, against which even countries that have some partners are opposed. well, primarily economic relations with the russian federation, but they will continue will push this topic, why? because they believe that this is still a sufficiently effective mechanism of influence on... certain western elites, on certain western countries, they will be able to achieve their goal in this way. in this case, their goal is very simple and banal: not to give ukraine the opportunity to obtain permission to strike the territory of the russian federation with western long-range weapons there. for the sake of this, they constantly disperse these theses, but then they have to give back a little bit for one

banal reason, because when you say that an attack by a large number of drones there is a challenge, well... we will strike back at the existence of russia there, even when the drones are just taking off, 120-130 drones really fly there in the morning, and a certain part of them actually fall into the russian military facilities, then you look like an idiot in the eyes of your electorate, your so-called people, because you are here shouting, stomping your feet, you can't really do anything, that's why piskov is immediately released into the arena and he explains that no, well, there is its own specificity, and it does not apply there... these things, or the decision is made in each case separately by the president, by the way, russian right-wing absolute experts, well, that is, those who are not in the opposition, who are in the territory of russia, they are allowed there on various tv channels and so on, they themselves say that this is such a paper strategy, the decision on its application is made by the president himself, he may or may not accept it, and now they are simply

implementing it in practice, because there are words, there are real actions, real actions are not what they are not ready to do, they.. . just do them, that's why forced by the mouth of pyskov to roll back a little further, and believe me, it will be exactly the same situation when we receive permission, the permission will not necessarily be public, they will fly further to the airfields and to many other strategic objects there, and they they will say that no, no, no, this does not correspond to the strategy in any way, and we will not actually use it in practice. you mentioned, by the way, about the permit, this one, we just spoke with the previous... talker from the united states of america that perhaps this permission will be granted already after the presidential elections in the usa, that is, during the period there, relatively speaking, from november to january. but still, going back to these nuclear threats, don't you think that these scaremongers are really, they are directly related to this possible authorization

in order to delay time, or at least prejudge in their opinion, maybe. giving ukraine permission to use long-range missiles on the territory of so-called russia, well, again, the question here is whether, for example, the white house or other our international partners to such nuclear, nuclear statements, and in this way there is delaying the granting of this permission, or are these things, they are completely unrelated, and no one in the already-called world reacts actually to putin's conditional nuclear blackmail . no, these things are connected, and look, putin's statement was made during the visit of our delegation to the united states of america, and in this way they tried to somehow distract attention as much as possible, intercept the information initiative, and, according to putin, to push the west, which means , on

western elites to succumb to it blackmail and, accordingly, they did not give ukraine permission to use weapons, moreover... their propagandists, they picked up on this thesis that, look, the ukrainian delegation returned without permission, so our statements worked, they are afraid of us, this is not to say the least, yes , because there are other reasons why the decision is being postponed for the time being, and about this, by the way, the same biden directly said that it is necessary to hold negotiations with partners in europe, we should discuss it in the ramstein format and so on, but well, there is a certain he is an element of influence surely there is a mind present here? our western partners, they cannot, after all, cannot not take into account even the minimal probability that what putin says, and he actually can implement in practice, therefore they must for some period of time, not too long, but review including those the plans and strategies that they have for such a case, if, for example, there, well, relatively speaking, the risk of a nuclear war was laid at the level of

fifty percent, after putin's statements, it may increase there to 0.7%, but they. have to list because that's how the western acceptance system works decisions, and in principle they are engaged in this, whether some real impression is made on them and forces them to abandon their actions there, i don’t think so, because indeed, after the beginning of a large-scale war, the russians made official statements more than 30 times about, well, with threats to inflict nuclear weapons blows, and it is clear that many people in the west do not react to this, but they cannot at the same time refuse... these minimal percentages of the probability that it could still happen. therefore, everything that putin gains here by making such statements is a little bit postpones the adoption of those decisions that... are important for ukraine itself, or forces, for example, the partner countries, well, in this case, we are interested in three countries, these are the united states, france and great britain, so it forces them

to reconsider something, for example , how will this permission be granted, what will be the format of this permission, maybe at first they wanted to do it more publicly, now they will do it there not publicly at all, well, that is , there are options here, i think that these options are quite active now are talked about and we need was and our delegation had to be ready for these options, well, listen, it ’s elementary right away, well, you can calculate and expect that when we fly with such a proposal, there will clearly be some kind of reaction from the russian federation, well, what, well, next of nuclear weapons, the next nuclear threats, especially since they discussed these changes to the nuclear doctrine a couple of months ago, this is also not news there, so we need to have a ready-made set of arguments why it won't work, we already have it, so to speak anti-crisis was included a little later. interviews that have begun to appear there from the president, including, yes, after the visit of the delegation, if they showed that we expected russia to do so, it should not become some kind of

obstacle there and so on, but our partners need to think about it to some extent, therefore , putin won some time, relatively speaking, for himself and for russia, but this time, well, at least as of today, it is not critical, that is, it is not a strategic decision, it is a decision of such a tactical nature. i also want to talk to you about dubious peace initiatives, but switzerland actually supported them the so-called peace initiative of china and brazil really appeared, and conditionally speaking, it included the prime minister of hungary viktor orbán, but let's go in order: the department of foreign affairs of switzerland announced that the country would support the so-called peace the initiative of china and... brazil regarding the war in ukraine, but emphasize the importance of strengthening the reference to the un charter in such peace plans. at the same time, the ministry of foreign affairs

of ukraine expressed disappointment over switzerland's support for the sino-brazilian this is the consensus regarding ukraine. we cannot understand the logic of such a decision. we call on the swiss confederation and all countries that uphold international law. un charter, to avoid participation in so-called peace initiatives, which can only complicate the process of achieving a comprehensive, just and sustainable peace for ukraine. actually, this is a statement of the ministry of foreign affairs of ukraine. but at the same time, by the way, viktor orbán, the prime minister of hungary, appears, he worked according to the data during the un general assembly in new york. some mass media on the organization of a peace summit, which should be a continuation of his so-called peace-making mission, we remember this peace-making mission when he

came to kyiv, to moscow, and actually, where ukraine and russia should be invited, and in fact such supported this peace plan between china and brazil, mr. igor, how much do you appreciate the reality. these are such initiatives, can it really be assumed that this will play any significant role in the international arena, or is this the kind of informational noise of china that wants to advance their position and their certain hegemony in the international arena, please, i would say that even you know, informational spam, that is, they are trying to attract attention somewhere to themselves in this way, while it looks like this... for two reasons: first of all, they never presented a normal plan, a normal one, there are some six points that they said, well, this is not serious, you will then

come up with some serious document, where each point, each point will have an explanation, why exactly it and why exactly in this one wording, they don't do it, and i'm convinced that they won't be able to do it, because they will immediately get into the united nations charter, you understand, they will immediately get into the fact that... how to interpret certain provisions and certain the actions of the russian federation, the phrase that russians like to use about the nation's right to self-determination, it is ridiculous in relation to certain regions of ukraine, because no donbas, luhansk or crimean people exist a priori, and all of them know perfectly well, and the same china does not can even talk about this matter, because there are at least two peoples, two nations living on the territory of china, tens of millions of whom... do not have their own state, the uyghurs and the tibetans, actually, yes, and in this context, china, well, it will not be able somehow come up with a real concrete plan, this is the first moment, and the second moment, why... this is

so far nothing more than informational spam, because this so-called platform is friends of peace and so on, and what exactly will it do, what will it be there is work, what they will do on skype, contact by zoom and hold some meetings there about what, who authorized them, they held talks with ukraine, if you are talking about ending the war that is going on in ukraine, then first of all you should probably turn to ukraine, they are not doing anything like that, well you know, one interesting point... chinese representatives are very fond of talking, and the russians repeated them that the so-called chinese peace plan was supported by more than 100 countries. i really want to look at these 100 countries, while there they have collected a little more than a dozen, and of course the position of switzerland is a bit disappointing, because it is an attempt to sit somewhere on two chairs, but in the end something similar could be expected from the swiss, as well as from the hungarians, by the way, but this will actually be a problem for europe and about hungary specifically for the european

union, where they participate. and in what format they participate, we need to be ready for this, that such initiatives will still appear, maybe this is not the only such platform, some will still be formed, but in fact, well, comment on all of them, since is made by the ministry of foreign affairs, here is the correct reaction, sufficiently operative, justified, in principle there are no major issues, but again, we must not forget that we must come up with our plan then, which will interrupt all these plans that are presented. there are other countries there, and when our delegation goes, this plan is presented to our partners in the united states, and so far you and i do not know anything about it, so other countries of the world that are not our specific countries do not know anything about it either. allies in this war, if they don't help us fight off the aggression of the russian federation, then maybe the time has come to publish this plan, at least in general terms, and thus intercept even this informed

initiative. the information that china is trying to kill now, hungary is somehow joining it, and some other countries are speculating, so the turn is actually ours, the reaction of the ministry of foreign affairs is great, but in order to to say that your idea is bad, you have to come up with your idea and prove how it differs from this so-called platform, and why this platform, it cannot exist in this format , well, we hope that the promises made by... the main person responsible for foreign policy, i mean the head of the president's office, will come true and soon this plan will finally be published and not only ukrainians, but also all other countries will get to know it. well, of course we will wait for this complete plan, i think that ukrainian society, including, should know and should see what the president of ukraine was traveling with to the contiguous states of america, but we will watch all this, mr. igor, we are

sincerely grateful to you for joining the live broadcast of the espresso tv channel. thank you, ihor reiterovych, political scientist, head of political and legal programs of the ukrainian center for social development, just visited in the new week. let's move on to the intermediate results of our survey. we ask you whether you are satisfied with the results of zelenskyi's visit to the usa, and we see the results now , yes, 16% of our viewers think so. and no 84 and in 15 minutes we will get back to you with discussion of even hotter topics, we will talk about the peace summit, and about the next one, another one of putin lavov's wishes regarding the ukrainian language, but for now, news from our partners from bbc ukraine, see you, don't switch.

the assassination of the leader of the khsbly in lebanon, strikes on houthi yemen, israel continues its operation, how are events unfolding in the middle east and what? telyaviv will do the next, the next 15 minutes of the bbc broadcast will be about it, dzaferov is working in the studio. israel plans to launch a ground operation in lebanon soon. this is israeli authorities have warned the united states, according to american media. the country is conducting military operations against the hezbollah group, which is based in neighboring lebanon and is recognized by many countries as a terrorist organization. previously, the minister of defense of israel.