Skip to main content

tv   [untitled]    October 2, 2024 1:30am-2:01am EEST

1:30 am
what is happening now in the middle east, literally tonight iran attacked, carried out the most massive attack on israel, the jerusalem post first reported about 500 rockets fired, then edited this news and said that there were 181 rockets, but this massive enough was shelled, biden has already ordered the military of the united states of america to shoot down... launched by iran against israel, the mass media reported with reference to the white house. well, the iranian islamic guard corps of the revolution said that israel would face devastating attacks if it responded to an iranian missile strike. so, vitaliy, i congratulate you and thank you for promptly joining our broadcast. greetings, good evening. so, what is the possible course of events after this massive attack by iran? israel, well, we see that
1:31 am
this attack did not lead to any serious consequences, practically, we cannot talk about the people who died during this attack, only two people were slightly injured in tel aviv, after another such situation related to... what happened with this massive shelling, so in that sense, of course, we can say that this attack ended the same way as the previous one, although this attack was more intense, well, with ballistic missiles, first of all, than its previous attack, this is of course a rather serious strike, well... by
1:32 am
the way, this strike was expected from the moment when the head of the hamas politburo, ismail haniyeh, was attacked and killed in tigaran, well, iran then promised to carry out an attack, did not implement, but yes it could be understood that just as the death of another terrorist leader, the leader of the hezbel organization and the general secretary of hasan, was approaching, it could not remain unanswered . in principle, another question arises now. the first question is whether this is the last such attack, because we see that iran has a huge missile arsenal, but everyone believed that iran had already used all its capabilities during the previous attack, but it did not. the second point, which also needs to be understood, is how israel will respond. now, of course, the allies will deter israel from answers, but for israel this is just an opportunity to answer, because it already is. the second
1:33 am
such massive strike on its territory raises the question of how much longer it has to hold back and whether it could use this new attack by iran to strike iranian military facilities, including facilities suspected of being built for iran's nuclear program, so by and large we are again approaching this situation of a major war in the middle east, we will see how things develop in the coming days, well, trump, the candidate for the presidency of the united states of america. of the cannes party has already declared that iran's attack on israel is a war, and he wrote about it on his social network, and it is obvious that trump in this situation said that it was expected that this was a war that could have been avoided, trump always yes, we know that all wars could be avoided if trump was the president of the usa, this is not news, so to speak, to comment here. what trump says and writes is
1:34 am
such a dubious pleasure, i would say, can the current situation unfold to broad hostilities in the middle east? well , prime minister netanyahu now has a window of opportunity, i would say a month, because president biden will definitely not hold him back, because any harsh words or actions against the israeli government, against israel, especially ... israel is being attacked, they are affecting the election chances of the democratic candidate. moreover, it must be said that the first congressman who said that iran's nuclear reactors are now legal was not a republican, but a democrat. this is so absolutely clear. jared moskowitz: iran made a mistake, it put its nuclear facilities on the board. he wrote on twitter. that is, we heard here. the reaction of trump,
1:35 am
who is a republican, and who is a democrat, that is, now the americans, they will support israel from both political camps, because this is the logic of the electoral struggle, and that's why it's all great for netanyahu. understand, he may wonder, if we strike, let's say, against hezbollah, if we strike iran, then when? after november 5, the situation can be completely different, which means that there is still time from october 1 to november 5, when it is possible to do some such actions, which in some other political period, four years in a row, serhiy, it will not be possible to do. well, we will monitor the development of the situation in the middle east, well, actually israel's reaction and... israel's response. thanks to vitaly for inclusion. it was vitaly portnikov, journalist, tv presenter of the espresso channel. friends, we continue to work live on the tv channel, as well as on our youtube and facebook platforms. for those who are watching us live there now. please subscribe to our pages. well, take it
1:36 am
participation in our survey. today it sounds like this: do you expect the united states of america to allow long-distance travel at the next riemstein. yes, no, everything is quite simple on youtube. if you have a personal opinion, please write it in the comments under this youtube video, if you are watching us on tv, pick up your smartphone or phone and vote on 0800 211 381 or 0800 211 382, ​​all calls to these numbers are free, vote at the end of the program, we will sum up the results of the voting, and in this issue friends, we will talk about this. special rammstein. after his american tour , zelenskyy is counting on the strengthening of the ukrainian strategy by his partners. will biden change the status of ukraine's application for nato membership. secret points of the
1:37 am
victory plan. the strategy for overcoming russian aggression is presented to ukrainians without some closed parts. what and from whom the income. the month of tax changes, from october 1 , taxes in ukraine should be increased, the amount of which has not yet been determined by the verkhovna rada. what is the delay? we will talk about all this today people's deputies of ukraine. i would like to introduce the guests of today's studio, this is yuliya klymenko, people's deputy of ukraine from the voice, the first deputy of the parliamentary committee on transport issues and. tour, ms. yulia, i congratulate you, thank you for being with us today. good evening. volodymyr rariev, people's deputy of ukraine from european solidarity, member of the parliamentary committee on digital transformation. mr. volodymyr, i congratulate you, thank you for joining the broadcast. good evening. and elizaveta yasko should also join us,
1:38 am
people's deputy of ukraine from the servant of the people. but it will happen a little later. well, since we, ladies and gentlemen, are asking our tv viewers and viewers whether? they expect from the united states of america permission for long-distance travel at the next raimstein, which will take place on october 12. i will also ask you in the format of a blitz poll. let's start with yulia klymenko. ms. yulia, do you think that such a decision, which has been waiting for a long time in ukraine, will be adopted at a four-way meeting of the leaders of germany, france, great britain and the united states of america. i hope that such a decision will be approved, but... the question is that it will definitely not be public, at least until the end of the election campaign in america, that is, if we learn about it, it will be the end of november, december, or if we find out about it, we will find out about it from russian propaganda channels, which will be babbling about the fact that some
1:39 am
missiles have landed somewhere, mr. volodymyr, i agree with my colleague, i just want to add that a lot will depend on that from whether it will be possible for ukraine to overcome the management chaos that has arisen in recent days, specifically in the defense sphere. in principle, this chaos has been frustrating our partners for a long time, and they are not very decisive in their actions anyway, and this only adds to their motives for doubt. thank you, mr. volodymyr, and well, since we are summing up this american tour, the great tour of volodymyr zelenskyi, his team, a very long year. unexpected meetings were said, heard, including with trump, because trump was not going to meet with zelensky, offended by his visit to the military plant in pennsylvania, but president zelenskyi said
1:40 am
after the end of his visit to the united states of america that during the next ramstein, based on the results of his negotiations in the united states of america, ukraine expects... specific things from partners to strengthen our strategy . let's listen to what zelensky said. this will be a special remstein. and from our side, partners. they get all the details, all the arguments, how to ensure results in the coming months both at the front and in diplomatic work. weapon strength and power diplomacy always works effectively, only together, and this is how we calculate, this is how we must implement the victory plan. and we were joined by elizaveta yasko, people's deputy of ukraine from servants of the people, member of the parliamentary committee on foreign policy and interparliamentary cooperation, ms. elizaveta, i congratulate you
1:41 am
and i am glad to see you on the air, i would like to remind you that yulia klymenko and volodymyr arriev, people's deputies of ukraine, are also on our air, ms. elizaveta, zelenskyi said that important decisions will be made at ramstein, and at the same time, zelensky reminded of biden's words that ukraine will win this war. and the united states of america continue to stand by us at every step, do you understand what cardinal decisions zelensky is talking about and what this special ramstein will be on october 12 during the meeting of the four leaders of great britain, france, germany and the united states of america. the most important thing for us is that we have enough weapons. so that we can not only defend ourselves, but also carry out the actions
1:42 am
that we need to carry out on the territory of russia in order to finally carry out the decolonization, in essence, of russia, to push russia to finally those processes that can take place in russia, so that they begin to take place, what does this mean in practice, this means military aid... of specific types of weapons , including long-range weapons, and this means permits for the use of these weapons, as we currently do not have permits from those countries that we would like to receive, we only have a part, well, we sincerely hope that this decision will be made in ramstein, thank you ms. elizaveta, mr. volodymyr, you remembered. about before, or rather, we all mentioned a rather difficult situation, well, during
1:43 am
zelensky's visit to the united states of america, about the bipartisan need for bipartisan support, can we say after the end of this visit that finally ukrainians and the ukrainian authorities understand the need for this bipartisan support, and that we will not favor one of the candidates and the other candidate will be offended. and how , during the current election races in the united states of america, will and will the ukrainian card be played, the ukrainian question? the ukrainian issue is generally one of the key issues in these pre-election races, and here we must not forget that on november 5 in the usa, not only presidential elections will be held, but also elections to the capitol, that is, to... american, to the american parliament , to the lower house and to the senate
1:44 am
in part, so in this case we have to understand that there is a comprehensive approach to ukraine, and in general the support and somehow the influence and participation of the usa on the situation in the war between ukraine and... it is key , and that's why when zelensky was going to washington, i was asked on one of the marathon channels what i expected from the visit, i said that in this situation, for a specific period of time, i expect caution, it is clear that bipartisan support for ukrainian diplomacy, especially at a time when ukraine is dependent on... military and financial aid from the united states, it must be something on the level of religion, simple, and therefore every step must
1:45 am
be checked, understanding that the republican party has a strong enough influence now, and it will still be quite strong represented in the parliament, let's say, in the lower house of the united states congress, you just need to understand that not only... depends on who wins trump or harris, but also on what configuration will be there, and take some steps that could, let's say, interfere with normal relations and or create a kind of negative post -scandal sediment for ukraine, it was simply unacceptable now, we are now in this situation, when it was not possible to maintain the necessary balance, which
1:46 am
the radical wing of the republican party clung to , we passed now just... lezu bri. thank you. thank you, mr. volodymyr. ms. yulia, how successful do you think our delegation's visit to the united states of america was, where the victory plan was presented. we will talk about it a little later, because yermak has already announced that this victory plan will finally be announced in ukraine. do you understand what, in general, with... what proposals the ukrainian delegation went with, what we got as a result? well, we don't really know what proposals the ukrainian delegation came with the information was hidden, it seems to me, not only in ukrainian society, in principle it did not get beyond the president's office to five or six managers, so it may be good if it is about a list of weapons,
1:47 am
for example, if it is about some kind of comprehensive plan of victory, who talks... about funding, and about ukrainian territories, and about occupied territories, and about nato, i would still like to hear him, so we don't really know what they talked about in washington, just like we don't know which one the result and how this plan was perceived by the presidential candidates, in fact any politicians and diplomats, the main rule is not to visit countries for 60 days. before the elections in these countries, because either one force, or the second, or the third, will definitely use you against the other, this actually happened with the ukrainian delegation, well, if they gave a push in pennsylvania, and in fact the issue is not only in the radical wing republicans, republicans in general took it very badly, and we saw critical letters from johnson and
1:48 am
not just johnson, actually, everybody... the republicans have big questions about this visit, so at this point, i would say we've complicated our relationship with the republican party, it's not just about the radical wing and it's not just about trump, so we need to somehow find a common language and start cooperating with them, as my colleague volodymyr rightly said, he will, one way or another, they will be in the congress and in the senate and will vote or not vote for aid to ukraine . until that it is such a big bar, i would say. i want to tell you the example of modi, who at the same time visited the general assembly, as well as the ukrainian delegation, and he refused to meet with all the candidates, including the current president biden. that is, he made
1:49 am
the decision of his neutrality for himself. and he, although he had an invitation, he said that... he would not be able to meet this time, he would definitely come after the elections, well, but, but modi could not meet with the candidates for the presidency of the united states of america, because he did not have such a harsh and aggressive war is being waged, they do not have such neighbors as russia nearby, which every day release tens, hundreds of drones and missiles at us, therefore, therefore, in principle , fashion can be understood, but in this situation, perhaps the president zelenskyi... there was no such, such a big election, ms. elizaveta, well, perhaps it is justified by the fact that zelenskyi wanted to meet with everyone, with the current president, with the vice president who is running for president and trump, who is also running for president presidents, i.e. unwinnable such a win-win option, when it was necessary to tell everyone about this victory plan,
1:50 am
which, well, i don't know, you probably haven't seen the victory plan either, forgive me, i ask you, are you... a representative of the servant of the people? yes, but i'll start with the fact that i want to remind you that this is the second presidential election in the united states, where they want to use ukraine as much as possible politically and technologically inside their election races, and it's very unpleasant, it's very bad, but we have to reckon with it, and i i believe that, given that the americans are the greatest political technologists, they ... know how to run this or that company, how to carry out discredits or manipulations from one side or another, and for all this time, well, in fact, that's how much. for 4-5 years, thank god, we have not had any serious scandals, we have always supported the position of bipartisan support, communicated with
1:51 am
democrats and republicans, and therefore this time president zelensky planned a meeting with democrats and republicans separately. it must have happened that the republicans were waiting for such a meeting to take place and accordingly held a very, as i said, a political-technological simply uh story where they positioned the way they positioned that it was supposed to be interference in the american elections, although it is not interference, it is diplomacy, the president has to meet really with two candidates, and you rightly said that we have a war , we are not india, where we can choose, the united states is the strategic biggest partner for us, and really, especially when we went with our peace plan, with all the details, i didn't see all
1:52 am
the details, but we there was a meeting where certain moments were spoken to us, but there was nothing there super secret, is it really about military aid, is it about ukraine's guarantees for joining nato, and this is andrii yarmako today. publicly, and we had to talk it over with both biden and trump. i believe that the meeting between volodymyr zelenskyi and trump, under the conditions in which it took place, actually went very well and successfully. you mentioned the year 2020, but do you remember, then it all almost ended with the impeachment of trump, because the conversation was between zelenskyi and trump, and trump demanded that zelenskyi influence the case. joseph biden, the main competitor of trump, who was involved in the case of burizma in ukraine and depended on the aid of the united
1:53 am
states of america on whether zelensky would give in or not, then this phone conversation got into the american media, her bodyguards were angry, and this began the whole procedure, but it turns out that zelenskyy is with trump for the second time and this is the story for the second time... when it is clear that they are among themselves, well, if they do find a common language, then it is difficult enough, and especially on the part of trump, but less so, you mentioned the plan victory, about yermak's statement, about the fact that this, this victory plan will be presented to ukrainians without some closed details, let's listen to what the head of the office of the president of ukraine said, because it is very... this is the president's plan, and certainly, as he promised, after presentations by the presidents and the united states, partners, i
1:54 am
think it will be presented to ukrainians, but i can tell you, of course, there are parts, they are so very sensitive, they are closed, and not because there are secrets, this is our country. we all, you know, today, in a good way words, we are really the only family in which there can be no secrets, especially during the war, but still, you know, everything that happened becomes public, and it is heard not only in our country, the enemy also hears it . mr. volodymyr, present and present to ukrainians without some hidden details. this plan of victory is obviously the right decision, but why, for example, in the closed mode of the supreme council of ukraine, in a closed
1:55 am
meeting, could it not be possible to present this entire plan and show that the highest legislative power in ukraine also participates in the preparation of this plan, or at least she is heard by this supreme legislative power, and has a voice in the present state? unfortunately, today the parliament of ukraine is not a subject and mainly performs the function of approving those bills that are submitted or agreed upon in the president's office, so in this case, if it were in a democratic country, it is clear that it would have to be presented to the people deputies, especially because people's deputies have access to state secrets and to... documents of all forms of secrecy, but we we can actually see that all the people's deputies here hold the president for nothing, and in general
1:56 am
with... i believe that all these plans, all these points, they are a secret, polishene. i can recall the statement of zelensky himself, who, after the counteroffensive promised in the 23rd year failed, he declared that the counteroffensive plan was on the table of the enemy of ukraine, the president, the dictator of russia, vladimir putin. therefore, in this if, where two know, as they say, a pig knows, and therefore, in this case, i do not see at all the need to hide something from ukrainians, i am more confused than others, that in fact such statements should not be made by the head of the president's office, but always by the press secretary on behalf of the commander-in-chief, because in this case article
1:57 am
106. of the constitution of ukraine, it clearly says , that the president cannot transfer his duties to anyone, in this case he transfers, transfers his duties to the head of the office yaermak, and this position as the head of the president's office is not in the constitution, nor in the laws of ukraine, it is only in the presidential decree, and in fact a person who has access to a document to which he should have access only. the commander-in-chief and a limited number of relevant ranks of the ministry of defense, the general staff of the intelligence service of the security service is held by a person who has virtually no state status, this is what worries me the most in this case, and when we talk about the fact that we do not need to know about these plans of the enemies, then i want to remind you of 2020, when after
1:58 am
being... uh, in zelenskyi's office in the presence of yermak, as well as the secretary zelensky presented a report on the final part of the special operation against the wagnerites, then this special operation was disrupted precisely because of the leak of this information from the office of the president of ukraine, therefore, in this case , there is no need to keep secrets from polisheneli and consider ukrainians to be fools, i'm sorry, but this is too much. thank you, mr. volodymyr, ms. yuliya, is it advisable... during the war, as yarmak says, not to say everything, or to show everything, because someone can pass these plans to the enemy, well, if the entire opzh faction is still sitting in the verkhovna rada, maybe i was overzealous when i said that it is necessary to hold a special session of the parliament and show these plans, because it is clear that there is a whole large pro-russian front in the verkhovna rada of ukraine, but the war... it is
1:59 am
general, people's, that is, it is not only zelenskyi yarmak's war against russia, that is, from the first days of the great war, this war is a people's war, where both small, old, and middle-aged ukrainians take up arms and fight against the russians, and how many but there is no information, we read it from different sources mass information, foreign, and it is not clear where the truth is, where it is not. where is the right plan, where is the wrong plan, then a lot of questions arise, and maybe there is some kind of stingy plan, or no, well, not exactly the kind that will suit in victory, in our victory, every ukrainian, well, let's say that and the president, and the head of the president's office, and people's deputies are sitting in
2:00 am
their seats only because... ukrainians, including civilians, took up arms and defended, at least kyiv, so it must be understood that ukrainians should be the first to learn about plans, especially peaceful plans, plans for victory, because they are the only ones who will decide which plans are acceptable for us, for which peace is acceptable, acceptable for us, and how we should move, therefore, you know, it is a humiliating procedure when something is presented to someone abroad... the media abroad all have information, they meet with journalists abroad, give them information about the victory plan, while ukraine and ukrainians, ukrainian journalists de facto not do not have access to any information, i am not talking about the deputies, so this is the situation, well, i think that if this plan was, let's say, realistic, it would be something new. and
2:01 am
it wouldn't be in it.

4 Views

info Stream Only

Uploaded by TV Archive on