so you are asking us about our missiles, of which we are in short supply, which we need for other available and possible soldiers, because for us it is ukraine above all, and they have israel on fire, they have trivan in danger, they have africa, they have latin america, they say, we've given you all we can, but we'll never empty our warehouses to nothing. the europeans have an even funnier story, they emptied their warehouses, and the new factories did not start up, did not fulfill their tasks. plans and will start giving shells and equipment there only next year, they say, but you have missiles for 300 km, and recently they launched a clearing for 500 and there are even developments for more than 1000, so maybe we will give you money and you will make more of it, you have the opportunity to release 100 neptunes per year, let us help you financially , score 300, no, you have to give us, otherwise you are to blame, this is not how responsible people behave.

folks, at this point the victory plan is a set of unilateral demands. here i want to dive a little bit into history. there was such a president of the united states, roosevelt, at the beginning of the second world war, when britain was one on one with the victorious hitler, who had virtually taken over all of europe. roosevelt came to congress and said: let's vote for lendlease. america. never gave money to other countries for war, even more so did not give away equipment for free, and he says: i will explain to you, i have a neighbor, the minister of finance, his barn somehow caught fire, he came to me and asked, he says: president, give i have a hose, i will put out a fire and then give you the hose back, and if it burns, i will pay you later in installments, that's what liand, and the americans voted that way, well, the british, by the way, until 2006, i think . the soviet union until the 70s, and they

somewhere until the 2000s, moreover, moreover, the british gave away their naval bases, in iceland, in asia, in africa, that is, they gave away a large part of their gold and currency reserves, that is, it is not it was just like that, and now look, and now transfer this historical example to what is happening in our country, the president of a warring country comes to the united states, and says: give me hoses, i have to put out a super fire. yes, of course, how much are you? did you buy do you have funds in your budget? i say, no, no, then the money to raise the salaries of tax officials, the economic security bureau, er, well, all my favorites, and i also have to build roads, in short, you understand, the hose will be yours, and drink beer and sing to the guitar at night we will stand for our own, well, it doesn't work that way, and that's why they always say... politely,

but consistently, start with yourself, because the victory plan, named coolly, ukrainians are not supposed to know it, we have already been told that it was shown to everyone, we will be shown partially, well okay, because we are a puppet, and the main characters have their own plans, yes, but the question is not about that, but we have the state budget of ukraine for the next year, this is to open the document, and anyone here, and even more so anyone there , it is read. open the budget for the next year and you will see a billion dollars for the construction of civilian roads, a billion ee, another 15 billion to raise the salaries of fiscal and law enforcement agencies, and a little over half a billion for investment projects, no one knows what and technology parks, no one knows for what. in

the amount of 2.5 billion dollars, i am transferring from hryvnia to good, let's calculate whether it would be possible to use these funds to make drones, rebs, relays, to at least cover our soldiers at the front, we will ask for offensive weapons from america, but you fulfill your homework, build something that will protect the soldier in the trenches, so that pensioners stop collecting their meager funds from the miserable pension of 3,000, instead of the state. buying them protection, no, it turns out that it's more important to raise the wages of our own and let these hungry orphans build again big construction, because you see, they starved in two years, or these investment projects starved, these are the same swindlers, that's why i am very critical of such behavior by allies, allies should be an alliance, first do it yourself, then ask for help. and not the other way around, unfortunately, that is why

we have problems with western support, that it is not, that the requests are dishonest, because we throw our money away to our... our hungry businessmen, our environment, hoping that the west will not get anywhere, and it will give us everything. well, to put it mildly, this is a dishonest policy. well, until things, about what volodymyr zelenskyy expects from our western partners. he spoke yesterday and in the evening address, he spoke about the need to close the sky over ukraine. let's listen to what the supreme commander of the armed forces of ukraine said. we. we see that one of the main reasons for the lack of security in the sky of ukraine and, in particular, near the borders of nato, of our neighbors is the lack of decisions about joint work, about joint defense, what works in the sky, the middle east, and helps the defense of israel,

can work and in the sky of our part of europe, in ukraine, in the same way, helping to save lives, there are special technical solutions. there is a completely effective tactic, today we talked, in particular, about it with mark ryuta, we will continue to convince all partners that it is necessary to implement what is necessary for effective protection of the sky. there is a reaction from the pentagon, they say that they will not get involved in the russian-ukrainian war, the deputy spokeswoman for the pentagon, sabrina singh, said at a briefing: that the north atlantic alliance will not intercept missiles and drones over ukraine, as it does over israel, let's listen to what she said. i understand your question, but we are talking about two very different landscapes and battlefields. from the beginning,

when russia invaded ukraine, the president instructed our department to provide ukraine with what is needed on the battlefield. they used air defense and others very successfully. means to continue to reclaim their territory. the secretary just spoke with mr. umerov to better understand what other opportunities are needed. the president took it upon himself a commitment that the united states would not enter ukraine, but support its efforts to regain its sovereign territory. you have already said, yury vitaliyovych, that western partners are looking at how we behave as a country, i and our ukrainian leadership, how we distribute the money that is in the budget. in the ukrainian budget, how appropriate are the parallels between how our western partners behave in the middle east and in ukraine? well, of course there are parallels, but let's compare the area of ​​israel, well, it's kyiv region, and the area of ​​ukraine, this is firstly, and

secondly, the challenges of israel's war, that is, with whom they are fighting and what is flying at them, well, mostly until recently, they were flying at them, well, simple. the pipe is filled with gunpowder, which was not maneuverable, so it was shot down very easily by the dome system, the israeli system, now really serious zaran rockets have arrived, and there are problems, now let's see what they shoot down, or rather, why they are helped by other countries to shoot down , well, only because there are relevant agreements in israel, no, not those filkini letters that our government slandered a couple of dozen of by signing documents that are not even subject to... ratification, well, simply that they sympathize with us and in general, well, they will do everything good, against everything bad. we have the only defensive, real agreement with britain, because there it is clearly written how much money and what equipment will be provided over the next five years. everything else is just , well, intentions, protocols about intentions, which

are not even subject to ratification either there, or in us, or in our parliament. now let's ask i ask myself an objective question, but why does something that flies to ukraine go astray? well , let's be honest, if we don't talk about the notes, because they are most likely, and not all of them are of our production, some of the western ones, okay, they are very expensive there, by the way, bullets, everything else, but they go astray, everything else, that , which does not break the thread, are shot down by small anti-aircraft missiles, they are all western, all these irises, all other systems all come from the west, and when ballistics come to us, or... even more so, winged ones missiles, then patriots are included, but patriots are open information, 500 missiles are released a year, and they are needed by all countries that think about their security, and no one is going to give them here, well, a large number is in no hurry, so just say that it

a greedy measure is a continuation of the search for the culprits, instead of remembering, where are our air defense systems, which were supposed to be... put into production in the 19th year and are frozen to this day. now let me just remember. first, to our commanders. there were not enough tanks, you remember, everyone shouted: "give tanks, tanks and tanks, especially american tanks, they are the ones who will turn the tide of the war, we will win, we gave, unfortunately, the victory did not appear, then they told us missiles, give us missiles, now the hymers gave them, and unfortunately, victory did not appear, then f16, give us f16, now they say they need more long-range missiles, you see, this is a childish approach. in a war with such an opponent as russia, there is no miracle weapon, it is turkey that can

launch baraktars and all these insurgents or terrorists there should be beaten with packs, because they drive there on cars, at best in the case of a large-caliber machine gun, in the best case with a soviet rpg, and therefore, of course, a high-tech weapon is a miracle weapon. here we are dealing with a modern, one of the largest armies, which has the entire spectrum. there are no armaments and miraculous weapons, russia can be defeated by a system, an extraordinary series about tanks, about missiles, about airplanes, about something else, it can be defeated by a system, but we lack systemic thinking, and that is why when the americans say, give us your plans, what you, what you will do yourself, what you want us to help you with, and what you want to do you... you, then we will understand that you have a system, so far,

unfortunately, such a plan has not appeared, instead, now we have a new miracle, we want to become a member of nato, president zelenskyi, first visit in the usa before president biden, it was back in the 20th year, if i'm not mistaken, in february, when he stepped in, he started with this, he said, we need to accept, join nato, and when he was told that this work with three 32... countries, he said, well, to hell with him, this is generally a routine, and soon germany, france he will get out of it, it was a shock for biden, all the newspapers there were buzzing after that, now after so many years, president zelenskyy is going to the usa and says again: we need to join nato, knowing for sure that in america in less than a month the presidential elections, that is, he communicates with the president, who actually has three weeks left, he will still be the president until... the inauguration in january, but for that, someone believes that in a month it is possible to mobilize 30 one country, crimea, the united states,

which must unanimously agree on the submission inviting ukraine to nato, why do it? things that cause only misunderstanding, well, irritation, or more precisely irritation, well, again, joining nato, this is a very correct policy, but in this i... whom i absolutely support, absolutely support, if it was a job of 5 years, because this is work with 32 very different countries, from the united states and britain to hungary, slovakia, if this system worked, instead of a year we were paired with peace forums, from cape verde and east timor, from san marino and other island countries, then it would be possible something gave, but on the last day we decided that we needed to... by appeal, well, such diplomacy does not work,

once it can work for surprise, the second time for respect for the heroic ukrainian people, and the third time it causes irritation, that is the problem, although, i want to be understood correctly, nato - this is the only formula for winning this war, the only formula for preventing the next war, without nato. we will not be able to end this war, nor prevent or prevent the next one, and we must work on this seriously, systematically and professionally. you already mentioned the victory plan you had to present to the ukrainians, well, at least that's what andriy yarmak said, that we will show the ukrainians the victory plan, but with the exception of some secret articles and points, the administrator of the united states of america agency for international affairs. of development samantha paver during a visit to kyiv in an interview with the public commented on the victory plan from

the point of view of economy and management, without touching on its military aspects. let's hear what she said. so our focus is on the civilian side, that's another battlefield to make sure that those who would want to detonate ukrainian democracy, who would like it to return to old habits regarding corruption, that these people, these forces did not succeed, well, enough of this incomprehensible, honest. saying, quote, i think that she herself did not see this victory plan, but sebyga, who was also in the united states of america, andriy sebyga, minister of foreign affairs of ukraine. announced historic decisions regarding the russian-ukrainian war, which will bring victory for ukraine closer, and he said this after a telephone conversation with state secretary antony blinkin, based on the results of zelensky's visit to the united states of america. following the conversation, sebiga wrote on the x social network that they coordinated the next

steps that will lead to historic decisions and bring the victory of ukraine closer. well, a lot, a lot. there is talk that this is some kind of victory plan that will allow us to do this, that, well, the united states of america probably also has some kind of victory plan for russia, and it may not coincide with our victory plan, i hope not for russia, anyway of ukraine, the plan of victory over russia, the plan of victory over russia, and it may not match, and one way or another, well, it is difficult to talk about a document that no one has seen, except. two people, maybe or three, look, in fact, it is true that the united states, in its, well, global attitude towards our war, is playing in its interests, thank god that they mostly coincide with ours, but we want to defeat russia with that , so that

a horde never comes from the north again, and the united states fears military defeat. as the beginning of the uncontrolled disintegration of a nuclear state, the spread of nuclear weapons, tens of millions refugees and all these horror stories that have been hovering over them for three dozen years, and mr. biden, his team, and most, not all, thank god, but the majority of politicians in america have, or rather profess exactly this approach. afghan to melt the enemy on a cold, slow fire and wait until he has insurmountable problems, and then another gorbachev will come to power, or even, well, yeltsin, who woke up in the morning and asked what you did for of ukraine, or the taliban as in afghanistan, here that's why they believe so, we all believe, well,

most of our politicians, that this is a mistake, that there are no red lines, that russia must be defeated now. on the battlefield in ukraine, on ukrainian territory, and thereby ignite this fascist contagion forever, because putin will not survive defeat in ukraine. the americans directly write in their main publications foreign affairs: we have to wait until putin dies and only then changes will be possible, because we cannot defeat him by military means. for a superpower, for a superpower for of the world gendarme is, well, frankly speaking, to put it mildly, downright shameful. position, especially since it is paid for with the blood of our soldiers, so in this situation, well, let's say, the different approaches of the west and ukraine in victory strategies are obvious, but this does not mean that we should be rude or fool our allies, because i apologize , we have been alive here

for these 2.5 years, only because the americans came to our aid literally in the first month of the war, and most of the... weapons, and most of the money in our budget is theirs, so we should be grateful to them, other the question is what we would like more, that's true, but here the question arises from their side, what is your strategy, what exactly should you do, because in order to even become a member of nato, you have to stop military operations, because the country is not accepted, well with military actions , the existing territory can be accepted, but without the territory that is currently located... look, as the example of germany shows, i once said about this, in my opinion, two-thirds of germany joined nato, and after 50 years 1 /3 of the soviet colony of the gdr broke through the wall and asked to go there to the zone of safety and wealth and and tolerance, democracy, in this case

there is such a scenario, but look, this can be told to you only by the president, who possesses the entire set of information about ours. resources, about external resources, about challenges, about everything else, but what is our problem, the problem is, and why does the fair say that they will show us something? the problem is that volodymyr oleksandrovich zelenskyi has both a plus and a minus, which is called the same, he is an artist, in the 22nd and part of the 23rd year, this saved us, because he was a wonderful speaker of heroic of the ukrainian people and the heroic armed forces of ukraine, giving the opportunity to... army professionals to do their thing, then he stood up again, wrote himself the script of the winning series, in the last series he personally, no one else, should go with the state flag to the state border in 1991 , all those who could have been close to him at the same time are removed from their positions, starting with the salaried one, ending

with syrskyi and budanov, too, well , in short, and the head of the ministry of foreign affairs, list as many as you want, all those who are at least a little starting people to recognize them for something appreciate, cleans up from this scenario. because there must be one hero, the main character, and you will understand, everyone else is a fake, so there is no point in talking to us, we are simply told where to go, it is your job to go to the trenches, and your job is to applaud me, and yours is to praise me at the marathon , your paying money, your pushing buttons in the parliament, and this policy of series one after another, which is not supported by general mobilization, i am in this case. i'm not talking about the troops, i'm talking about military mobilization in general, it's hitting us now, i dare say that on the front, the main thing is not the shortage of shells, although it is very large, not the shortage of equipment,

although it is very large, not the shortage of personnel due to incomplete mobilization, not the shortage of fortifications and not even the shortage of drones, but the biggest shortage of faith that the authorities in kyiv have the plan for victory and it counts with us, it seems to me that we are coming right now... the moment when the president should address the nation, as he addressed in the 22nd, unite it, explain his plan for victory, in order to that everyone, including such critical oppositionists as myself, and up to him turbadurs and bankova were in the same line, because we all want to win, because the elections will be later, first we need to save the country, but unfortunately, look, there is such a formula, it is impossible to win both the war and the elections at the same time, and... the leader chooses his sequence, so it seems to me that president zelenskyi and his team first want to win another presidential election, and then somehow with war. this means that he is not a statesman,

but a political leader. we will now talk about the elections. i will remind our viewers that we we conduct polls throughout our broadcast. we ask you about the following: do you support the idea of ​​economic harrowing against mobilization? yes, no, everything is quite simple on youtube, either yes or no, write your own opinion in the comments under this video. if you are watching. we have 0800 211381 on the air, if you support the idea of ​​economic defense against mobilization, no 0800-211-382, all calls to these numbers are free. the british publication zaiconist writes about the prospect of presidential elections in ukraine elections next year. what do the british write? despite the fact that last year all major political parties agreed to postpone the elections until the end of the war, mr. zelensky is now considering the possibility of holding presidential elections next year in order to strengthen his power, the newspaper writes. you, yury vitaliyovych, do you think

zelensky will be able to hold elections in the 25th year? there are such signals. a week ago, we received information that the election headquarters at the bank received a salary for the first time, to start preparations for the presidential election. yes of course well, as in any. the party, the election headquarters, does not dissolve after the elections, but somehow lives there for a minimum, at the moment when the preparations for the elections begin, it usually begins to function, unfold, and so on. uh, well, our election headquarters basically went to the front, we have 2,500 party members now in the active army, and here we receive such information, then we see the decision of the central committee of the russian federation. then for one statement, then another, then we see a massive

sweep of the information field and recognizable figures who have at least some rating, all this leads to the idea that something is being prepared, and from what we hear from the servants of the people, from the employees of the president's office, only presidential elections are planned, no others, neither parliamentary nor local, why? this has been known for a long time, we talked about it many times when the question was whether the president is legitimate, yes, he is legitimate, but not because his elections, that is, while the war is going on, he exercises the powers of the president, elections of the parliament during war , the constitution prohibits, but presidential elections are not prohibited by the constitution, they are only prohibited by the law on special time, and i always said that, well, what's the difference, everything is the same in wartime, for example, you can't divide the army into those who vote for one party and for the other, how will they go on the attack together tomorrow, this brotherhood

is not possible. on such problems, especially they cannot be forced to vote for someone who is ordered by the commander, and even worse, if they are excluded from the process at all, although they also have such a strange idea, because what to do with 8 million people abroad, what to do at all with voter lists, you can imagine how much displaced people from the east of ukraine and from the center to the west, and where, where to look for them, who will control them, there are a lot of questions, but this is all technique, i am back to this thesis: the statesman thinks how to win the war even at the cost of his rating, as the same cherchyn, who is so loved by banks, did in his time, and the politician is thinking about how to win the presidential election, including at the cost of territorial concessions in ukraine, i am afraid that not just an election is ahead, but a referendum on

the neutral status of ukraine. as a condition for an end to the war from putin, combined with presidential elections, all this will be packed, i really want to be wrong, but it is very similar, we know that the tasks that are set before nato, well, not possible tasks, not because ukraine cannot be accepted into nato, because it cannot be done in a month or two, and nato will accept us, give us such and such a list of weapons in such and such quantity, give us so much money. "if you don't give, then you have abandoned us, and therefore we are forced to go, taking care of the people, of course, to negotiations, and at the negotiations we hear the demand of a neutral status, and neutral status is a referendum, which means a ceasefire is necessary, which means no continuation of martial law, which means a referendum with simultaneous presidential elections, such a scenario is now widely debated in political circles, but what about the constitution, which states that we are leaving to

nato?". so here is a referendum to change the constitution, i am talking about it, a referendum to change the constitution in combination with the presidential elections, that is, there is a candidate and his course, that is serhii, i honestly do not like to discuss all this, but i have before stand with eyes face, and the words in the ears, but i won't repeat them here, what they say about it at the front, they all feel that the politicians started some kind of maneuvers, but simply in their lives, well, there is no place for... for such maneuvers, that's why i i consider it absolutely unacceptable and irresponsible to organize any elections, well, for me, as a person who is not the opposition, god had mercy without any mandates and everything else, well, it would seem, it would be interesting, no, it is categorically not interesting, because i i believe that any political campaign will weaken ukraine now, we need it now...

around ukraine, we now need to unite and strengthen ukraine, and that is why i am in favor of president zelenskyi, for whom i did not vote, whom i strongly criticize, as you may have noticed, to remain in his position and start speaking to his people, as with adults, as with the main actors, to go to victory together, and not to play a political reboot, well, yourself. thank you, yuriy vitalivych, it was yuriy lutsenko, a politician, the former prosecutor general of ukraine, and friends, i would like to remind you that throughout our broadcast we conduct surveys, we ask you on whether you support the idea of ​​economic harrowing against mobilization, the intermediate results of our television survey, 19% yes, 81% - no. 15 minutes of news from the bbc, we will return to the studio, we will have journalists, larisa voloshina and yanina sokolova, stay tuned to the espresso tv channel,

it will be interesting. israel is intensifying its shelling of lebanon, zmi reports that the target was the brother of the slain leader of hezbollah and his probable... successor, where else will israel strike, will it dare to strike at nuclear facilities on the territory of iran? we analyze it in today's edition of the bbc. i am olga polameryuk. in response to iran's strike with ballistic missiles on october 1, the israeli army intensified its shelling of the hesla infrastructure in lebanon. powerful explosions rang out last night in the lebanese capital, beirut. several american media wrote that the target of the attack could be the cousin of the leader of the security service of ukraine killed last saturday. there were at least 10

strokes ahead. the city of beirut reported the lebanese national.