to raise the salaries of fiscal and law enforcement agencies and a little over half a billion for investment projects, no one knows which ones and technology parks, no one knows for what, in the amount of 2.5 billion dollars, i am transferring from the hryvnia to the dollar, let's calculate whether it is possible for these the funds would be to make drones, folks. rails, to at least cover our soldiers at the front, we will ask for offensive weapons from america, but you do your homework, build something that will protect the soldier in the trench, so that pensioners stop collecting their meager funds from the unfortunate pension in 3 00, instead of the state, buying them protection, no, it turns out that it is more important to raise their salaries and let these hungry orphans build big construction again, because you see, they...

starved for two years, or these investment projects starved, these are the same swindlers, so i am very critical of such behavior by allies, allies should be an alliance, first do it yourself, then ask for help, not the other way around, unfortunately, that is why we have problems with western support, that it is not, that the requests are dishonest, because we are our own you... throw money to our corrupt officials, our own hungry businessmen, their environment, hope that the west will not go anywhere and will give us all this, well, this is, to put it mildly, dishonest politics. well, by the way, about what volodymyr zelenskyy expects from our western partners, he spoke yesterday and in the evening address, he spoke about the need to close the sky over ukraine, let's listen to what the supreme commander of the armed forces of ukraine said. we see that one of

the main reasons for the lack of security in the skies of ukraine, and in particular, near the nato borders, of our neighbors is the lack of decisions on joint work, about joint defense, what works in the skies of the middle east and helps the defense of israel, can also work in the skies of our part of europe, in ukraine, as well, helping to save lives, are special. night decisions are a very effective tactic, today we talked, in particular, about this with mark ryuta. we will continue to convince all partners of what needs to be implemented, what is needed for effective protection of the sky. and there is the reaction of the pentagon, they say that they will not get involved in the russian- ukrainian war, the deputy spokesperson pentagon sabrina singh at a briefing. said

that the north atlantic alliance will not intercept missiles and drones over ukraine, as it does over israel. let's hear what she said. i understand your question, but we are talking about two very different landscapes and battlefields. from the beginning, when russia invaded ukraine, the president instructed our department to provide ukraine with what it needed on the battlefield. they used anti-aircraft very successfully. defenses and other means to continue to win back its territory the secretary just spoke with mr. umerov to better understand what other opportunities are needed. the president pledged that the united states would not enter ukraine, but would support its efforts to regain its sovereign territory. you have already said, yury vitalivych, that western partners are looking at how we behave as a country, i and our ukrainian leadership, how we distribute money. is in the budget,

the ukrainian budget, as far as the parallels between how our western partners are relevant behave in the middle east and in ukraine? well, of course there are parallels, but let’s compare the area of ​​israel, well, this is the kyiv region, and the area of ​​ukraine, this is, firstly, and secondly, the challenges of israel’s war, that is, with whom they are fighting and what is flying at them, well in mainly , until recently, trumpets and blanks flew at them. well, just a pipe filled with gunpowder, which was not maneuverable, so it was shot down very easily by the couple system, the israeli system, now really serious rockets have arrived from iran, and there are problems, now let's let's see what they're doing, or rather, why other countries are helping them to do it, well, only because there are relevant agreements in israel, no, not those filkish documents that our government slandered a couple of dozen of them by signing the documents. which are not even subject

to ratification, well, simply about the fact that they sympathize with us and in general, well, they will do everything good, against everything bad. the only defense, we actually have an agreement with britain, because there it is clearly written how much money, what... uh, equipment will be provided over the next five years, everything else is simple well, intentions, protocols about intentions, which are not even subject to ratification either there, or in us, or in our parliament. now let's ask ourselves the question objectively, but what is it that goes astray after all that flies to ukraine? let's be honest, if we don't talk about the notes, because they are rather for, and not all of them are of our production, some of the western ones, okay, they are very expensive there, by the way, bullets and everything else. but they miss, everything else misses what is not missed by the thread, misses by small anti-aircraft missiles, they are all to one western, all these irises, all other systems all come from the west, and when ballistics, or even more cruise missiles, come to us,

then the patriots are included, but the patriots, this is open information, 500 missiles are released a year, and all countries need them , who think about their safety and no one is in a hurry to give them here in large numbers, so just saying that this is a greedy measure is a continuation of the search for culprits instead of remembering, where are our air defense systems, which were supposed to be put into production in 19- m year, and today are frozen. now let me just remember, at first our... commanders lacked tanks, you remember, everyone shouted: give us tanks, tanks and tanks, especially american tanks, they are the ones who will turn the tide of the war, we will win, they gave, unfortunately, victory did not appear, then they told us missiles, give us missiles,

now hymers, they gave, and unfortunately, victory did not appear, then f16, give us f16, now they say they need more long-range missiles, you understand this is... a childish approach, in a war with such an adversary as russia there is no miracle weapon, it is turkey that can launch barricades and shoot down all these rebels or terrorists there in packs, because they drive there on cars, in the best case with a large-caliber machine gun, in the best case with a soviet rpg, and therefore, of course, high-tech weapons are a miracle of weapons, here we have dealing with modern, one of the largest armies, which has... the range of weapons and the miracle of weapons is not there, russia can be defeated by a system, a non-regular series about tanks, about missiles, about planes, about something else, it can be defeated by a system, namely system thinking in us

is not enough, and therefore, when the americans say, give us your plans, what you, what you will do yourself, what you want us to help you and... what you want to achieve, then we will understand what you have a system appeared, so far, unfortunately, such a plan has not appeared, instead, now we have a new miracle, we want to become a member of nato, president zelenskyi, the first visit to the usa by president biden, it was back in the 20th, if i'm not mistaken, it was in february, when he took office, he started with this, he said, we need to accept, join nato, and when they told him that it was work with 30... 32 countries, he said, well, cholera with him, it's a routine, and soon germany and france will leave it, it was a shock for biden, all the newspapers there were buzzing after that. now, after so many years, president zelenskyy goes to the usa and says again: we need to join nato, knowing for sure that in

less than a month there will be presidential elections in america. that is, he communicates with the president, who actually has three weeks left. he was still later. will be the president until the inauguration in january, but for that, someone believes that in a month it is possible to mobilize 30 one country, crimea, the united states, which must unanimously agree on the submission of ukraine's invitation to nato, well, why do things that cause only misunderstanding, well, irritation, or rather irritation, well, again after all, joining nato is very... politics, but in this i absolutely support zelensky, i absolutely support it, if it was a 5-year work, because it is work with 32 countries, very different, from the united states and great britain to hungary, slovakia. if this the system worked for not a year, we were paired with

peace forums, with cape verde and east timor, with san marino and other island countries, then maybe it would have given something, but on the last day... we decided that we need nato on call , well, this kind of diplomacy doesn't work, once it can work for surprise, the second time for respect for the heroic... ukrainian people, and the third time it causes irritation, that's the problem, although i want to be understood correctly, nato - this is the only formula for victory in this war, and the only formula for prevention the next war. without nato, we will not be able to end this war, prevent or prevent the next one, and we must work on this seriously and systematically. and professionally, you already mentioned the victory plan that was supposed to be presented to the ukrainians, well, at least that's what

andriy yarmak said, that we will show the ukrainians the victory plan, but with the exception of some secret articles and points, the administrator of the united states agency for international development samantha paver, during a visit to kyiv in an interview with the public, commented on the victory plan with from the point of view of economy and management, without touching on its military aspects, let's listen to what... she didn't say. so our focus on the civilian side is another battlefield to make sure that those who would want to undermine ukrainian democracy, who would want it to go back to the old ways of corruption, that these people, these forces, do not succeed. well, enough of the obscure quote, to be honest, i don't think she saw this victory plan herself. but sibiga, who was also in the united states of america, andriy sebiga, minister of foreign affairs affairs of ukraine, announced historic decisions regarding the russian-ukrainian war that will bring ukraine closer to victory, and

he said this after a telephone conversation with state secretary antony blinkin, following the results of zelenskyi's visit to the united states of america, sebighe wrote on the x social network, following the results of the conversation, that they coordinated, that they coordinated further steps that will lead to historic decisions and bring ukraine's victory closer. there is a lot of talk about the fact that this is some kind of plan of victory, which will allow us to do this, that, well, the united states of america probably also has some plan to defeat russia, and it may not coincide with our victory plan, i hope not russia, after all, ukraine, a plan to defeat russia, a victory plan over russia, and it may not match, one way or another, well, it's hard to talk about a document that no one has seen. or apart from two people, perhaps or three? look, in fact, it is

true that the united states in its, well, global attitude towards our war, is playing in its own interests, thank god that in most they coincide with ours, but we want to defeat russia so that a horde never comes from the north again, and the united states is afraid of them.' which defeat of russia as the beginning of the uncontrolled disintegration of a nuclear state, the spread of nuclear weapons, tens of millions of refugees, and all these horror stories that have been hovering over them for tens of three years, and mr. biden, and his team, and most, not all, thank god, but the majority of politicians in america are, or rather, they profess precisely such... what is the afghan approach: to melt the enemy on on a cold, slow fire and wait until

he has insurmountable problems, and then another gorbachev will come to power, or even, well, yeltsin, who woke up in the morning and asked what he did for ukraine, or the taliban , as in afghanistan, that's why they confess like that, we all believe, well, most of our politics, that this is a mistake, that there are no red lines, that russia must be defeated on the battlefield in ukraine on ukrainian territory and that to ignite this fascist contagion forever, because putin did not will survive defeats in ukraine. the americans directly write in their main publications foreign affairs: we have to wait until putin dies and only then changes will be possible, because we cannot defeat him by military means. for a superpower, for a superpower, for a world gendarme - it's, well, to be honest, if only it were softer. i will say frankly, a shameful position, especially since it is paid for with the blood of our

soldiers, so in this situation, let's say, the different approaches of the west and ukraine in the strategies of victory are obvious, but this does not mean that we must be rude or fool our allies, because i'm sorry, we have been alive here for these 2.5 years only because the americans came to our aid literally in the first month of the war. and most of the weapons and most of the money in our budget are theirs, so we should be grateful to them, another question is that we would like more, it is true, but here a question arises from their side. what is your strategy, what exactly should you do, because in order to even become a member of nato, you have to stop military actions, because the country is not accepted, well, with military actions until to on the territory it can be accepted, but without the territory that is currently under occupation, see how the example of germany shows, i once told you about it in my own way, 2/3

of germany joined nato, and after 50 years 1/3 -er... the soviet colony of the gdr broke through the wall and asked to go there to the zone of security and wealth and tolerance of democracy in this case there is such a scenario, but look, this can be told to you only by the president, who possesses the entire set of information about our resources, about external resources, about challenges, about everything else, but what is our problem, the problem is, and why does the fair say that they will show us something? the problem is that volodymyr oleksandrovich zelenskyi has both a plus and a minus, which are called the same. he is an artist. in the 22nd and part of the 23rd year, it saved us, because he was a wonderful speaker of the heroic ukrainian people and the heroic armed forces of ukraine. enabling army professionals to do their thing. then he stood up again, wrote

himself a script for a winning series. in the last series, he is none other than himself. should come out of the state flag on the state border in 1991, everyone who could have been close to him at the same time is removed from their positions, starting with the lieutenant, ending with syrskyi, budanov, and umerov, as well as umerov , and in short, the head of the ministry of foreign affairs, well, list as many as you want, everyone who at least a little begins to be recognized by people and appreciate them for something, clean up. of this scenario, because there must be one hero, the main character, and you will understand, all the others are fake, so there is no point in talking to us, we just they say where to go, it's your job to go to the trenches, and your job is to applaud me, and your job is to praise me at the marathon, your job is to pay money, and your job is to push buttons in the parliament, and this is a series of policies that are not

supported by general mobilization. .. in this case i am not talking about the troops, in general about military mobilization, it is hitting us now, i dare to say that the main thing at the front is not the shortage of shells, although it is very large, not the shortage of equipment, although it is very large, not a shortage of personnel due to lack of training mobilization, not a shortage of fortifications and not even a shortage of drones, the biggest lack of faith in the fact that the authorities in kyiv have a plan for victory and are counting on us, it seems to me exactly... now the moment is coming when the president should address the nation, yes, as he appealed in the 22nd, to unite it, to explain his plan for victory, so that everyone, including such critical oppositionists as myself, and up to his troubadours with the bank were in one line, because we all want to win, because the elections will be held later, the country must be saved first, but

unfortunately, look, there is such a formula, it is impossible to win both the war and the elections. at the same time, each leader chooses his turn, so it seems to me that president zelenskyi and his team first want to win another presidential election, and then somehow with war. this means that he is not a statesman, but a political leader. we will now talk about the elections. i will remind our viewers that we conduct polls throughout our broadcast. we ask you whether you support the idea of ​​economic harrowing from mobilization? yes, no, everything is quite simple on youtube, either yes or no, write your own opinion in the comments. under this video, if you watch us on tv 0800 211 381, if you support the idea of ​​economic defense against mobilization, no 0800 211 382, ​​all calls to these numbers are free, the british publication zaiconist writes about the prospect of holding elections in ukraine, presidential elections already next year,

the british write, despite the fact that last year all the major political parties agreed to postpone elections before the end of the war, mr. zelensky is said to be considering the possibility of holding presidential elections next year to strengthen his power, the publication writes. you, yury vitaliyovych, do you think zelensky will be able to hold elections in the 25th year? there are such signals. a week ago, we received information that the election headquarters at the bank received a salary for the first time, to start preparations for their presidential office. yes, of course. well, as in any serious party, the electoral headquarters does not dissolve after the elections, but somehow lives there for a minimum, at the moment when the preparations for the elections begin, he usually begins. well , to function, to deploy and so on, well , our election headquarters basically went against it, we have 2,500 party members now in the active army, and

here we receive such information, then we see the decision of the cec, the list of voters, well, it’s not like that, there are clarifications of precincts so far, that is, then one statement, then another, then we see a mass sweep of information. field and recognizable figures that have at least some sort of rating, all this leads to the idea that something is being prepared, and from what we hear from the servants of the people, from the employees of the president's office, only presidential elections are planned, no others, neither parliamentary nor local, why, this has been known for a long time, we talked about it many times when the question was whether the president is legitimate, yes, he is legitimate, but not because his election, that is, while the war is going on. he exercises the powers of the president, the election of the parliament in time of war is prohibited by the constitution, but the election of the president is not

prohibited by the constitution, it is only prohibited by the special time law, and i have always said, what's the difference, everything is the same in wartime , for example, you can't divide the army into those who vote for one party and for the other, how will they attack together tomorrow? this fraternity cannot be pricked on such problems, even more so they cannot be forced to vote for someone who is ordered by the commander, and even worse, if they are excluded from the process altogether, although they also have such a strange idea, because what to do with 8 million people abroad, what to do with voter lists in general, can you imagine how many displaced people from the east of ukraine and from the center to the west, and where, where to look for them, who will control them, there are a lot of questions, but this is all technology. i return to this thesis again: a statesman thinks how to win a war, even at the cost of his rating, as the same cherchyn, who is so loved in

banking, did in his time, and a politician thinks how to win the presidential election, including at the cost of territorial concessions to ukraine . i'm afraid that not just an election, but a referendum on a neutral state will be confusing ahead. the status of ukraine, as a condition for ending the war from putin, combined with the presidential elections, all this will be packed, i really want to be wrong, but it is very similar, that we know that nato is being set, well, impossible tasks, not because ukraine cannot be accepted into nato, because it cannot be done in a month or in two, and then accept us in nato, give us such a list of weapons in such and such a quantity. give us so much money, if you don't give us, then you have abandoned us, and therefore we are forced to go, taking care of the people, of course, to negotiations, during the negotiations we hear the demand

for neutral status, eh, and neutral status is a referendum, which means we have to a ceasefire, which means no continuation of martial law, which means a referendum with simultaneous presidential elections, such a scenario is now widely debated in political circles, and what about the constitution, which states that we are going... to nato, so here is a referendum for changes to the constitution, i’m talking about it, a referendum to change the constitution in conjunction with the presidential elections, that is, there is a candidate and his course, that is, sergius, honestly, it’s unpleasant for me to discuss all this, but i have faces in front of my eyes, words in my ears , but i will not repeat them here, what they say about it front, they all feel that the politicians started as some kind of maneuvers, but simply in their lives... well, there is no place for such maneuvers, so i consider it completely unacceptable, irresponsible to organize

any elections now, well, for me, as a person who it 's not that the opposition, god had mercy, without any mandates and everything else, well, it would seem, it would be interesting, no, categorically not interesting, because i believe that any political campaign now will weaken ukraine, we want it... now we need to split ukraine, now it is necessary to unite and strengthen ukraine, and that is why i am in favor of president zelenskyi, for whom i did not vote, whom, as you may have noticed, i strongly criticize, to remain in his position and start talking to his people as adults, as with the main actors, in order to go to victory together, and not to play a reboot politically... with myself personally. thank you yuri vitalievich. it was yuriy lutsenko, a politician, former prosecutor general of ukraine. and friends, i would like to remind you that throughout our broadcast we are conducting

poll. we ask you about this, will you support it? the idea of ​​economic booking from mobilization, the interim results of our television survey 19% yes, 81%, no, there are discounts on videin, 10% in pharmacies psyllium, bam and oschad, there are discounts on hepergin 20% in pharmacies psyllium bam and oschad. vasyl zima's big broadcast. my name is vasyl zima, this is a big ether on the espresso tv channel. two hours of airtime, two hours of your time. my colleagues and i will talk about the most important things. two hours to learn about the war, about the military, front, component. sergey zurets, and what the world lives on. yuri fizer is already in front of me and it's time to talk about what happened outside ukraine. yury, good evening. two hours to keep up with economic

news. time to talk about money. as well as distinguished guests of the studio, mustafa dzhemilov, the leader of the crimean tatar people, in touch with us, mr. mustafa, greetings, good day, the events of the day in two hours, vasyl zima's big broadcast, a project for... smart and caring evenings at espresso . we are military personnel of a separate unit of griga, named after volodymyr griga, a unit of unmanned aerial vehicles aviation complexes of the 76th separate battalion of the 102nd separate brigade. in the zaporozhye direction , combat clashes occur daily due to constant

enemy assaults. gulyaipilsk does not escape this. the direction that our battalion has been defending for almost 2 years. right now we need three times as many modifiers and fire damage from the sky. therefore, we are appealing to everyone who cares to collect funds for 20 dji mavic classic drones and 10 3t mavics. yes, the amount is not small, but the life of your siblings and relatives is much more expensive. we really hope for your support. donate and share. let's not let the occupier take a step further together. but let's speed up the victory together. glory. a word to the heroes of ukraine. journalist who joined the armed forces, political expert who became a special agent, taras berezovyts in a new project on espresso. the real front is a thorough analysis of the main events. reports, comments of leading specialists and experts. analytics from the major of the armed forces. how to understand and

distinguish disturbing news. the real front program with taras berezovets every saturday at 21:30 on espresso.

greetings, friends, live on the espresso tv channel, the second part of the verdicta program, and today, as well as every friday, we have a journalism club, my name is serhiy rudenko, and for the next 45 minutes we will talk about the following. delays presentation. ukrainians were promised to tell exactly what strategy for overcoming russian aggression zelensky presented to biden. when will ukraine see its victory plan? the issue is not on the agenda. the president's office denies preparations for next year's elections. how long can the state live without rotation of those in power.

kimchen-in atomic stick