able to create an effective management system, that is, multi-year plans of responsible persons, control over them and punishment of those who either steal or are simply an ineffective manager. instead, he replaces all this very difficult, mundane, perhaps often invisible, unheroic activity, perhaps he replaces it with these infamous fortresses. he believes that if we hold this fortress, we will win the war, it will not be like that, because if the 72nd brigade, which saved kyiv in 22, being alone against 50 thousand russian invaders who were advancing on kyiv, stands in ugledava, there were 20 men left in the infantry battalion of this brigade, nothing can be done to save ... "if you don't have reserves that

came from mobilization, and there were none, 20 men in the battalion there must be at least 200, and even 300-400, this means that the war control center did not do its job, if they did not hear artillery salvos for a month and a half, then it means that the war control center did not provide them with shells, if at the same time they have a ratio of drones to russians of one to 10, then this means that the state did not provide them with what is necessary, if they are bypassed on the flanks, and this city, well, in a multi-story building in the bare steppe, if they are bypassed on the flanks, and bypassed through the terrorist brigade, because the combat assault troops went into the thicket, then this means, that there is no fortification, which means the war control center did not fulfill what it promised us after the fall of avdiivka, you? the

same while we continue to shoot a series of slippery fortresses one after the other for the third year now until we build the system work of war, the machines of war here, unfortunately, it will continue, what i mean by construction, we will eventually have to have engineering troops and build fortifications, but now the 72nd brigade has come out, it is retreating along the main field, i am afraid to think how difficult it will be. and i’m afraid to think about the amount of blood, in the ratification, a billion dollars were allocated for them this year from the state budget, and to cover the fighters from the advancing enemy with drones, they are, no, they are not, but 1.5 billion dollars were allocated for them, and if you have 20 men in your battalion. formation, then where are these reserves? do you remember

we were told that there are 12 brigades, only there are no weapons for them, or 14, but there are no weapons, so where are they, why are they not in the trenches? therefore, summarizing one thing: first, great respect to those who defended bogledar in those terrible 2.5 years, and to the 72nd brigade, and many other units, because they did everything they could and much more, and to those who who stood on the flanks, are also not provided with everything they need. and allowed a breakthrough, also a huge respect, and this is a huge setback for a state that conducts war so unsystematically, and episodic orders about the heroism of individual units, this is not the way to victory. the way to victory, says zelensky, is an operation in the kursk region, because today he was in ... sumshchyna and said that this operation

will help ukraine to end the war justly. let's listen to what zelensky said at the end of his visit to sumy oblast? it is very important to understand that the kurdish operation is a really strategic thing, something that adds motivation to partners, adds motivation to be with ukraine, will be more decisive, and put pressure on russia, put pressure as, as it can until... help us end the war, end the war justly. yuriy vitaliyovych, the armed forces of ukraine have been in the territory of the kursk region for two months, in your opinion, how appropriate is it to hold these territories, and will this allow to end the war fairly, as zelensky says? i partially agree with the president, because the kursk operation really broke a lot of stupid, far-fetched people. red

lines in the west, it is true, it restored faith in the fact that the armed forces can not only stand on the defensive, but conduct unexpected, brilliant offensive operations, well, i would say so, returned the slogan "ukraine is not dead yet" to us, to many who are struggling with the last year of retreat, and even more so in the west, but from the second, to the second 50%, i do not agree with the president, because i believe that all the positives of this offensive have already exhausted, and at this moment it is coming, well, if the tail hits us, predicted in advance, and i told you about this in the studio, possible negatives, now they are no longer possible, but... if you have 1,600 km of battle line with the russians have more resources and resources in people and in equipment and in ammunition and in artillery and in tanks and so on than you then it is not in our interests to increase the combat reporting line by another 320 km, today in

sumy oblast and kursk oblast, i have no right to say how many, but believe me, there are a lot of brigades that were withdrawn from donbas. ukrainian brigades, and this means that our defense in donbas has become weaker, fewer people, less equipment, fewer bc, fewer hymers, fewer of everything, so the fact that many russians were taken prisoner there and our heroes returned home is an honor and approval , what woke up the west, well done, the fact that the soldiers are also showing heroism there, unequivocally, but it seems to me that... at this moment, russia is already demonstrating that it is not worried about it, i.e. the occupation of 4% of one kurdish region, not the whole of russia, but just one region, less than 1000 km now, that is , that we occupy only

45,000 km on the left bank, they are not concerned, but our troops are stretched, it seems to me that in this situation a decision must be made to strengthen the donbass, and i... rely on the opinion of a military officer who i deeply respect as a pro, absolutely non-partisan, absolutely, well let's say objective. mr. muzhenko, the former head of the general staff, he said that , of course, any offensive actions against the enemy are correct, but first of all we must defend our own, and all resources and all plans should be built around not surrendering our lands, and that in this situation, it seems to me that the president... became engrossed in, ah, the kurdish operation, trying not to notice that in donbas every day we cede our territories, and ahead, i say once again, pokrovsk, well, in fact, the enemies are two behind boarding from pokrovsk, and this is a direct road to

dnipropetrovsk region, pavlograd and beyond the dnipro, and kurakhovo, and this is a direct road to zaporizhzhia, it seems to me that this, well... you at least require thoughtful systemic actions in ukraine. against this background, zelenskyi says that ukraine is starting to increase the production of weapons, and among other things, he says that it is starting to produce systems, unmanned systems. that is why , in your opinion, the president is emphasizing right now on the third year of the great war and whether there were any other options. with the beginning of the great war, and your calculations for your own weapons, well let's put it this way, it would be a long conversation if we remembered what happened in the 19th year, how the missile, artillery, drone, air defense and many other

programs were frozen, let's put it down to the fact that the current president believed that all this was unnecessary, the main thing was to look into putin's eyes and meet in the middle. let's hurry to the fact that he was a naive manager who did not understand that he was dealing with an absolute maniac, to whom to go unarmed means simply to fall into the clutches, to become a victim. yes it happened in the 19th year, in the 22nd year, i'm sorry. but in the 22nd year there was a shock. we all fought back from the russians, and even we ourselves did not believe how... how heroic those actions were, now it is clear that the 22nd year was a year when it was necessary to fight back, but no quick development of our own military equipment, for sure it was not possible, yes, in 22 we received western aid for lethal

weapons for the first time. equipment for their production in this... there was a specificity, and therefore we purchased equipment for rockets, for artillery, and components, and we did and did all this with our own money, but... in this case, the next year is the 22nd year was a shock lesson, and the 23rd, in the 23rd year, it was obviously necessary to deploy the ukrainian military-industrial complex, i am far from thinking that the ukrainian military-industrial complex could do there, well, from scratch the best missiles, the best tanks, the best planes, such things so quickly are not being built, nevertheless, it was possible to arrange the release of a million drones, which were promised to us, we heard that by this year there will be a million drones, but when the deputy commission pushed

the relevant heads of state institutions against the wall, we learned that, well, let's say so, if you don't call the figure like that, let them call it what they belong to, there is not a third, you understand, so at the front on all this talk about a million drones evokes the same reaction that you and i have about billions, billions, yes or a million. and this despite the fact that the funds have been allocated, and this despite the fact that in many places people assemble these drones on their own, that is, the state could, if it wished, to do, it's not space production, it's just assembly, on the other hand, ukraine has finally restored its missile programs, which were developed under poroshenko, and look what 's happening in our country, all our propaganda is hitting ukrainians in the head that it's bad west. "greedy america does not give permission to strike with long-range missiles, how many kilometers?

at first they said 150, then they admitted that there is nowhere to hit at 150 km, because the russians have long since removed all their planes from there and are flying much deeper, 300, and here it is absolutely fair questions from the americans, i say we apologize, but you have neptune, but it hits at 300, so you are asking us about our missiles, which we do not have enough of. what do we need for other available and possible soldiers, because for us ukraine is above all else, and israel is on fire for them, taiwan is in danger for them, africa is for them, latin america is for them, they say, we gave you everything we could, but we will never empty our warehouses to zero, the europeans have an even funnier story, they emptied their warehouses, and the new factories did not spin up, did not fulfill their plans and will start giving shells there and equipment, only next year, they say: but you have rockets for 300 km, and recently they launched a meadow for 500 and there are even developments for more than

a thousand, so maybe we will give you money and you will make more of them, you have the opportunity to release 100 neptunes in a year, let us help you financially, score 300, no, you must give us, otherwise you are guilty, this is not how responsible people behave, at this moment the victory plan is for... a selection of one-sided demands. here i want to dive a little bit into history. there was such a president of the united states roosevelt states at the start of world war ii, when britain was one on one with a victorious hitler who had virtually taken over all of europe. he came to congress, roosevelt, said: let's vote for lendlease. america has never given money to other countries for war, let alone technology. for free and he says: i will explain to you, i have a neighbor, the minister of finance, his barn once caught fire, he came to

me and asked, he says: president, give me a hose, i will put out the fire and give you the hose back later, and if he burns, then i'm yours then i will pay in installments with money, that’s what lendlease is, and the americans voted so, well, the british, by the way, until 2006, i think it was the 16th, the rodian union until the 70s, and they somewhere until the 2000s, more that was paid by those. moreover, the british gave their naval bases in iceland, in asia, in africa, that is, they gave away a large part of their gold and currency reserves, that is, it was not just like that, and now look, and now transfer this historical example to what is happening here, the president of a belligerent country is coming to the usa and says: give me the hoses, i need to pay off the superpoje, she says: yes, of course, how much did you buy, do you have funds in the budget? i say no, no, then money to raise the salaries of tax officials, the economic security bureau, uh,

well, all my favorites, and i also need to build roads, in short, you understand, the hose will be yours, and we will drink beer and sing to the guitar at night let's stand up for ourselves, well, it doesn't work that way, and that's why they always approach me politely, but they consistently say, start with yourself, because the plan for victory... is called cool, for ukrainians it is not supposed to know, we were already told that it was shown to everyone, we will be shown partially, well, okay, because we are a mask, and the main characters have their own. plans, yes, but the question is not about that, but we have the state budget of ukraine for the next year, it is an open document, and anyone here, and even more so, anyone there, reads it, open the budget for the next year and you you will see things, a billion dollars for the construction of roads, civil purposes, a billion, er,

another 1.5 billion to raise the salaries of er, fiscal and law enforcement. bodies and more a little over half a billion for investment projects, no one knows which ones, and technology parks, no one knows for what, in the amount of 2.5 billion dollars, i am transferring from hryvnias to dollars, let's calculate whether it would be possible to make drones with these funds, guys , relays, eh, to at least cover our soldiers at the front, offensive weapons will be... asked for in america, but you do your homework, build something that will protect the soldier in the trench, so that the pensioners stop and collect their meager funds from the unfortunate 3,000 pensions, instead of the state buying them protection. no, it turns out that it is more important to raise the salary of our own and let these hungry orphans build a large construction again, because you see,

they starved in two years, or these investment projects starved, these are the same swindlers. that is why i am very critical of such behavior by allies, allies should be an alliance, first do it yourself, then ask for help, not the other way around, unfortunately, that is why we have problems with western support, that it is not, that the requests are dishonest, because we throw away our money to our corrupt officials, our hungry businessmen, our own environment hope that the west will not go anywhere and will give us all this, well, to put it mildly, this is dishonest politics, and by the way, about what volodymyr zelenskyy expects from our western partners, he spoke yesterday and in the evening address, he talked about the need to close the sky over ukraine, let's listen to what the supreme commander of the armed forces of ukraine said.

we see that one of the main reasons for the lack of security in the sky. ukraine and, in particular , near the borders of nato, our neighbors have a shortage of decisions about joint work, about joint protection what works in the sky of the middle east and helps the defense of israel, can work in the sky of our part of europe, in ukraine, in the same way, helping to save lives. there are special technical solutions, there are quite effective tactics. today we talked, in particular, about this. with mark ryuta, we will continue to convince all partners about what needs to be implemented, what is needed for effective protection of the sky. there is a reaction from the pentagon, they say that they will not get involved in the russian-ukrainian war, deputy spokeswoman for the pentagon sabrina singh at the briefing, said that

the north atlantic alliance will not intercept missiles and drones over the... country, as it does over israel. let's hear what she said. i understand your question, but we are talking about two very different landscapes and battlefields. from the beginning, when russia invaded ukraine, the president instructed our department to provide ukraine with what it needed on the battlefield. they used anti-aircraft defenses and other means very successfully to continue their conquest its territory the secretary just spoke to. the united states will not enter ukraine, but supports its efforts to regain its sovereign territory. you have already said, yury vitaliyovych, that western partners are looking at how we behave as a country, myself and our ukrainian leadership, how the money that is in the budget,

the ukrainian budget is distributed, how relevant are the parallels between how our western... partners behave in the middle east and in ukraine, well, of course there are parallels, and - but let's compare the area of ​​israel, well, it's kyiv region, and the area of ​​ukraine, these are, firstly, and secondly, the challenges of israel's war, i.e. with whom they are fighting and what is flying at them, well, mostly until recently they were flying at them with trumpets, well, blanks, well, the trumpet is simply inflated gunpowder, which was not maneuverable, and therefore was shot down. is very easily the dome system, the israeli system by the way. now really serious early morning rockets have arrived and there are problems. now let's see what they fail, or rather, why others help them. countries to bring down, well, only because there are relevant agreements in israel, no, not those filkin letters that our government slandered a couple of dozen times, after signing

documents that are not even subject to ratification, well, just that they sympathize with us and in general, well, they will do everything good, against everything bad, the only defense, really we have an agreement with britain, because there it is clearly written how much money, what equipment will be provided over the next five years, everything else is just well... intentions, protocols about intentions, which are not even subject to ratification either there or in us, not in our parliament. now let's ask ourselves the question is objective, but what makes something that flies to ukraine go astray? well , let's be honest, if we don't talk about the notes, because they are most likely and not all of our production, some of the western ones, okay, they are very expensive there, by the way, bullets, everything else, but they go astray, everything else, what doesn't miss a beat, gets lost in small counter-poetry. missiles, they are all western, all these irises, all other systems all come from the west, and when

ballistics, or even more cruise missiles, come to us, then the patriots are included, but the patriots, this is open information, 500 missiles are produced a year, and they are needed by all countries that think about their security, and no one is going to give them here, well, a large number is in no hurry. therefore, simply saying that this is a greedy measure, this is a continuation of the search for the guilty, instead of remembering, and where are our air defense systems that were supposed to be put into production in the 19th year, and to this day are frozen, now i will allow myself to simply remember, at first, our commanders lacked tanks, you remember, everyone shouted: give tanks, tanks and tanks, especially... american tanks, they are the ones who will turn the tide of the war, we will win, they gave us, unfortunately, victory did not appear, then they told us missiles, give us missiles,

here are hymers, they gave us, unfortunately, victory on appeared, then the f16, give us the f16, now they say they need more long-range missiles, you see, this is a childish approach, there are no miracle weapons in a war with such an opponent as russia. it is turkey that can launch barricades and in syria beat down these rebels or terrorists there with bundles, because they drive there machines, in the best case with a large-caliber machine gun, in the best case with a soviet rpg, and therefore, of course, high-tech weapons are a miracle of weapons, here we are dealing with a modern, one of the largest armies, which has the entire range of weapons and there is no miracle of weapons, the system can defeat russia. a non-regular series about tanks, about missiles, about planes, about something else, it can be defeated by the system, but we

lack systemic thinking, and that's why, when the americans say, give us your plans, what do you, what will you do yourself that you want us to you helped and what do you want to achieve, then we will understand that you have a system, so far such a plan for... has not appeared, instead, now we have a new miracle, we want to become a member of nato, president zelenskyi is the first a visit to the usa by president biden, it was back in the 20th year, if i’m not mistaken, in february, when he took office, he started with that, he said, we need to accept, join nato, and when he was told , that this is work with 32,302 countries, he said, well, the hell with him, it’s a routine in general, and soon germany, france will be out of it it turns out, it was a shock. biden, there all the newspapers were buzzing after that. now, after so many years , president zelenskyy is going to the usa and says again: we need to join nato, knowing

for sure that the presidential elections in america are in less than a month, that is, he is talking to the president, who actually has three weeks left, he will later will be the president until the inauguration in january, but for this one, someone believes that it is possible to get ready in a month. 30 one country, crimea, the united states, which must unanimously agree on the submission of ukraine's invitation to nato, so why do things that cause only misunderstanding, well, irritation, or more precisely, irritation, well, once again joining nato, this is a very correct policy, but in this i absolutely support zelenskyi, i absolutely support it, if it was a job of 5 years, because it is... work with 32 very different countries, from the united states and great britain to hungary, slovakia, if this system worked, instead of a year we

were steamrolled by forums. from cape verde and east timor, san marino and other island countries. then maybe it would have given something, but on the last day we decided that we need nato summons, well, such diplomacy does not work. one time it can work for surprise, the second time respect for the heroic ukrainian people, the third time it causes irritation. this is the problem, although i want to be understood correctly, nato is the only formula for victory in this war, and the only formula for preventing the next war. without nato, we will not be able to end this war, prevent or prevent the next one, and we must work on this seriously, systematically and professionally. you already mentioned the victory plan, which were to be presented to the ukrainians,

at least that's what andrii said. that we will show the ukrainians the victory plan, but with the exception of some secret articles and clauses. administrator of the united states agency for international development , samantha paver, during a visit to kyiv, in an interview with the public, commented on the victory plan from the point of view of economy and management, without touching on its military aspects. let's hear what she said. so our focus on the civilian side is another battlefield to... make sure that those who would to undermine ukrainian democracy, who would like it to return to the old habits of corruption, that these people, these forces did not succeed, well, enough of such an unclear, to be honest, quote, i think that she herself did not see this victory plan, but sybiga , who was also in the united states of america, andrii sebiga, minister of foreign affairs of ukraine, announced historic decisions regarding the russian-ukrainian war that would bring

victory closer. of the country, and he said this after a telephone conversation with state secretary antony blinkin, following the results of the visit zelenskyi to the united states of america, following the conversation, sabiga wrote on the x social network that they coordinated further steps that will lead to historic decisions and bring the victory of ukraine closer. well , there is a lot, a lot of talk that this is some sort of victory plan that will allow us to... do this, that, well, the united states of america probably has some kind of victory plan for russia as well, and it may not coincide with our plan victory i hope not to russia, but to ukraine. a plan to defeat russia. a plan to defeat russia. and it may not match, and anyway, well, it's hard to talk about a document that no one has seen, except maybe two or three people. look,

actually, it's true that... that the united states, in its, well, global attitude towards our war, is playing in its own interests, thank god, they mostly coincide with ours, but we want to defeat russia so that more never came a horde from the north, and the united states fears a military defeat of russia as the beginning of the uncontrolled disintegration of a nuclear state, the spread nuclear ... weapons, tens of millions of refugees, and all these horrors that are over them, have been waiting for three dozen years, and mr. biden, and his team, and the majority, not all, thank god, but the majority of politicians in america are, well, rather, they profess exactly this afghan approach, to melt the enemy on a cold,

slow fire and... wait until he faces insurmountable problems, and then another gorbachev or even yeltsin will come to power. who woke up in the morning and asked what he did for of ukraine, or the taliban, as in afghanistan, that's why they believe so, we all believe, well, most of our politicians, that this is a mistake, that there are no red lines, that russia must now be defeated on the battlefield in ukraine, on the ukrainian territory and thereby forever ignite this... fascist contagion, because putin will not survive defeat in ukraine. the americans directly write in their main editions of foreign affairs. we have to wait until putin dies and only then will changes be possible, because we cannot defeat him by military means. for superpower, for a superpower, for a world gendarme - this, to be honest, to put it mildly, is a downright shameful position, especially since it is paid for with the blood of our

soldiers. so in this situation, well...