to which to go unarmed is simply to fall into the clutches, to become a victim, so it happened in the 19th year, in the 22nd year, i apologize, but in the 22nd year there was a shock, we all fought back from the russians, and even they themselves did not believe how heroic those actions were, now it is clear that the 22nd year was a year when it was necessary to fight back, but no, well... rapid development of one's own military equipment was probably not possible. yes, in the 22nd year for the first time we received western help with lethal weapons. maybe someone has forgotten, so i want to remind you that from in the 14th year, western countries forbade us not only to give us lethal weapons, but even the equipment for their production. there was a specificity in this, and that is why we purchased equipment for rockets, for artillery, and components, and we did all this with our own money.

and they did, but in this case, the 22nd year was a year of shock, and the 23rd, in the 23rd year , it was obviously necessary to deploy the ukrainian military-industrial complex, i am far from thinking that the ukrainian military-industrial complex could make there, well, from scratch the best missiles, the best tanks, best planes, things like that so fast it is not being built, however, to arrange the issue of a million. that were promised to us, it was possible, we heard that this year there will be a million drones, but when the deputy commission pushed the relevant heads of state institutions against the wall, we learned that, well, let's say so , if you don't call the figure like that, let them call it, there is not a third, so on the front, all this talk of a million drones is getting the same reaction. what do you and i have about billions

billions yes or a billion yes and this despite the fact that the funds have been allocated, and this despite the fact that in many in some places, people assemble these drones on their own, that is, the state could do it if it wanted to, it’s not space production, it’s just assembly, on the other hand, ukraine has finally resumed its missile programs, which were developed under poroshenko, and look what’s happening in our country, the whole our propaganda. hammers into ukrainians' heads that the bad west, greedy america, does not give permission to strike with long-range missiles, how many kilometers, at first they said 150, then they admitted that there is no place to hit at 150 km, because the russians have long since removed everyone from there planes take off, well much deeper, 300, and here is a completely fair question from the americans, we apologize, but you have neptune, it already hits 300. so you are asking us about our

missiles, which we do not have enough, which we need for others available and possible soldiers, because for us it is ukraine above all else, and they have israel on fire, they have trivan in danger, they have africa, they have latin america, they say, we gave you everything we could, but we will never devastate until zero our warehouses, the europeans have an even funnier story, they emptied theirs warehouses, and the new factories did not get off the ground, did not fulfill their plans and... but you have rockets for 300 km, and recently they launched a clearing for 500 and there are even developments for over a thousand, so maybe we will give you money and you will make them more, you have the opportunity to release neptune 100 pieces a year, let us help you financially, score 300, no, you must give us, otherwise you are guilty, this is not how responsible people behave. at this point, the

victory plan is a set of one-sided requirements. here i want to briefly touch on the history. was such was president roosevelt of the united states at the outbreak of world war ii, when britain was one on one with a victorious hitler who had effectively taken over all of europe. he came to congress, roosevelt, said: let's vote for lendlease. america never gave. money in other countries for the war, especially not giving away the equipment for free, and he says: i will explain to you, i have a neighbor, the minister of finance, his barn somehow caught fire, he came to me and asked, he says: president, give me a hose, i'll put out the fire and give you the hose later back, and if it burns down, then i will pay you in installments later, that’s what lenis is, and the americans voted that way, well, the british, by the way, until 2006, i think, on the 16th, yes... well, they gave it away,

that is, it was not just like that and now look, and now transfer this historical example to what is happening in our country, the president of a belligerent country comes to the united states and says: give me hoses, i need to put out a super fire, she says: yes, of course, how much did you buy do you have funds in your budget? says: no, no, then the money to raise the salaries of tax officials, bureau of economic security, well, all my favorites, and i also have to build roads, in short, you understand, the hose will be yours, and drink beer and sing to the guitar, at night we will be on our own, well, it doesn’t work that way, and that’s why i’m always from the west politely, but steadily

they say, start with yourself, because the victory plan is called cool, ukrainians are not supposed to know it, we have already been told that they have shown it to everyone, they will show us a part of it, well, okay, because we are... a mask, and the main characters have own plans, yes, but the question is not about that, but we have them the state budget of ukraine for the next year, it is an open document, and anyone here, and even more so, anyone there, is reading it, open the budget for the next year and you will see things, a billion dollars for the construction of roads, civil purposes, a billion, uh, another 1.5 billion for salary increases. to fiscal and law enforcement agencies and a little over half a billion for investment projects, no one knows what and technology parks, no one knows what for, in

the amount of 2.5 billion dollars, i am transferring from hryvnias to dollars, let's calculate whether it is possible with these funds would be to make rebel drones. in order to at least cover our soldiers at the front, we will ask america for offensive weapons, but you do your homework, build something that will protect the soldier in the trench, so that pensioners stop collecting their meager funds from the unfortunate pension of 300, instead of the state, buying their protection, no, it turns out that it is more important to raise the wages of their own and let these hungry orphans build a big building again, because you see, they starved in two years. or these investment projects have gone hungry, that is the same swindlers, that is why i am very critical of such behavior by allies, allies should be an alliance, first do it yourself, then ask for help, not the other way around,

unfortunately, that is why we have problems with western support, that it is not, that the request dishonest, because we throw our money away to our corrupt people. to his hungry businessmen, his entourage, hoping that the west will not go anywhere and will give us all this, well, this is, to put it mildly, dishonest politics. well, by the way, about what volodymyr zelenskyy expects from our people western partners, he spoke yesterday and in the evening address, he spoke about the need to close the sky over ukraine, let's listen to what the supreme commander of the armed forces of ukraine said. we see that... one of the main reasons for the lack of security in the sky of ukraine and in particular near the nato borders of our neighbors is the lack of decisions on joint work and joint defense. what works in the sky of the middle east and helps the defense of israel

can also work in the sky of our part of europe, in ukraine, also helping to save life, there are special technical solutions, there are quite... effective tactics, today we talked, in particular, about this with mark ryuta, we will continue to convince all partners about what needs to be implemented, what is needed for effective protection of the sky. and there is the reaction of the pentagon, they say that they will not get involved in the russian-ukrainian war, the deputy spokeswoman for the pentagon, sabrina singh, said at a briefing that the north atlantic ... alliance will not intercept missiles and drones over ukraine, because does it over israel. let's hear what she is said i understand your question, but we are talking about two very different landscapes and battlefields . from the beginning, when russia

invaded ukraine, the president instructed our department to provide ukraine with what it needed on the battlefield. they used anti-aircraft defenses and other means very successfully to keep going. reclaim their territory. the secretary just spoke with mr. umerov to better understand what other opportunities are needed. the president undertook that the united states will not enter ukraine. but support her efforts regain their sovereign territory. you have already said, yury vitaliyovych, that western partners are looking at how we behave as a country, myself and our ukrainian leadership, how the money that is in the budget is distributed in the ukrainian budget, how relevant are the parallels between how our western partners behave in the middle east and in ukraine. well, parallels certainly exist, and, but, let's show them. well, this is the kyiv region and the square of ukraine, this is, firstly, and secondly, the challenges

of israel's war, that is, with whom they are fighting and what do they fly? well, mostly, until recently , pipes were flying at them, well, just a pipe filled with gunpowder, which was not maneuverable, and therefore it was shot down very easily by the dome system, the israeli things of the system. now really serious missiles have arrived from iran, and there are problems. now let's see what they are doing wrong, or rather, why they are helped by other countries to do it, well, only because there are relevant agreements in israel, no, not those filkin letters that our government has slandered a couple of dozen of, having signed documents that are not even subject to ratification, well, simply about the fact that they sympathize with us and in general, well, they will do everything good, against everything bad. we have the only defense, real agreement with britain, because there it is clearly written how much money, what equipment will be provided during... the next five years, everything else is just intentions, protocols about intentions, which

are not even subject to ratification, no there, neither in our country, nor in our parliament, now let's ask ourselves the question objectively, and what is wrong with what flies to ukraine, well, let's honestly say that if we don't speak about notes, because they are most likely and not all of our production, some of western production, okay, they are very expensive there, by the way, bullets, everything else, but they go astray, everything else. what does not knock down the note is knocked down by small anti-aircraft missiles, they are all western, all these irises, all other systems all come from the west, and when ballistics, or even more cruise missiles, come to us, then the patriots are already included, but the patriots , this is open information, 500 missiles are produced per year, and they are needed by all countries that think about their safety, and no one... is in a hurry to give a large amount here, so

just saying that this is a greedy measure, this is a continuation of the search for the guilty instead of remembering, where are our air defense systems that were supposed to be put into production in 19 year, and are frozen to this day. now i will allow myself to simply remember, at first our commanders were lacking there. you remember, everyone shouted: give tanks, tanks and tanks, especially american tanks, they are the ones who will turn the tide of the war, we will win, gave, on alas, victory did not appear, then they told us missiles, give us missiles, now the hymers, they gave and unfortunately victory did not appear, then f16, give us f16, now they say they need more long-range missiles, you understand this is a childish approach to war. with such an adversary as russia, there is no miracle weapon, it is turkey that can

launch baraktars and shoot down all these rebels or terrorists there in packs, because they drive there on cars, in the best case, with a large-caliber machine gun, in the best case, with a soviet rpg, and therefore, of course, high-tech weapons are a miracle weapons, here we are dealing with a modern, one of the largest armies, which has the entire range of weapons and miracles. no, russia can be defeated by a system, an extraordinary series about tanks, about missiles, about planes, about something else, it can be defeated by a system, but we lack systemic thinking, and that is why, when the americans say, give us your plans, that you, what will you do yourself, what do you want us to help you with, and what do you want to achieve? then we will understand that you have a system, so far, unfortunately, such a plan has not appeared, but now we have

a new miracle, we want to become a member of nato, president zelenskyi, the first visit to the usa by president biden, it was back in the 20th year, if i am not mistaken, in february, when he stepped in, he started with this, told us should be accepted to join nato, and when he was told that this is work with three 32 countries, he said well... cholera with him, this is a general routine, and soon germany and france will leave it, it was a shock for biden, all the newspapers are there were buzzing after that, now after so many years, president zelensky is going to the usa and says again: "we need to join nato, knowing for sure that the presidential elections in america are in less than a month, that is, he is talking to the president, who actually has three weeks left, he will still be the president until the inauguration in january, but someone believes that in a month it is possible to persuade the 31 countries of the crimea to

unanimously agree on the submission of ukraine's invitation to nato. so why do things that cause only misunderstanding, well, irritation, or rather irritation, well, again. joining nato, this is a very correct policy, i absolutely support zelenskyi in this, i absolutely support it, if it was a job of 5 years, because it is work with 32 countries, very different, from the united states and britain to hungary, slovakia, if this system worked, and for not a year we were paired with peace forums, with cape verde and east timor, with san marino and other island countries, then maybe it would have given something, but on the last day to decide that we need nato by invitation, well, this kind of diplomacy does not work , once she

can work surprisingly, the second time respect for the heroic ukrainian people, the third time it causes... irritation, that's the problem, although, i want you to understand me correctly, nato is the only formula for victory in this war, and the only formula for preventing the next war. without nato, we will not be able to end this war, prevent or prevent the next one, and we must work on this seriously, systematically and professionally. you already mentioned about... the victory plan that was supposed to be presented to the ukrainians, well, at least that way andriy yarmak said that we will show the ukrainians the victory plan, but with the exception of some secret articles and points, the administrator of the united states agency for international development, samantha paver, during a visit to kyiv, in an interview with the public, commented on the victory plan from

the point of view of the economy and management, without touching on its military aspects, let's hear what she said... well, our focus on the civilian side is another battlefield to make sure that those who would want to undermine ukrainian democracy, who wanted that she would return to her old habits regarding corruption, that these people, these forces did not succeed, well, enough of this unclear, frankly, quote, i think that she herself did not see this plan of victory, but sybig, who was also in of the united states of america, andriy sebiga, minister of foreign affairs of ukraine, announced historic... decisions regarding the russian-ukrainian war, which will bring victory for ukraine closer, and he said this after a telephone conversation with secretary of state antony blinken, following the results of the visit zelenskyi to the united states of america, following the conversation, sebig wrote on the x social network that they coordinated, that they coordinated

further steps that will lead to historic decisions and bring the victory of ukraine closer, well , there is a lot, a lot of talk about that. that this is some kind of victory plan that will allow us to do this, that, well , the united states of america probably also has some kind of victory plan for russia, and it may not coincide with our victory plan, i hope not russia, after all, ukraine, victory plan over russia, a plan to win over russia, and he may not match, and anyway, well, uh, it's hard to talk about a document that no one has seen, except maybe two people. look, in fact, it is true that the united states in its, well, global attitude towards our war, is playing in its own interests. thank god that most of them coincide with ours, but we want to defeat russia so that there will never be another kind from the north, and

the united states is afraid of the military defeat of russia, as eh... the beginning of the uncontrolled disintegration of a nuclear state, the spread of nuclear weapons , tens of millions of refugees, and all of them horror stories that have been hovering over them for three dozen years, and mr. biden and his team, and most, not all, thank god, but the majority of politicians in america have, or rather profess exactly this approach, the afghan one. to melt the enemy on a cold, slow fire and wait until he has insurmountable problems, and then another gorbachev or even yeltsin, who in the morning... woke up and asked what the did for ukraine, or the taliban, as in afghanistan, that's why they profess so, we all believe well, the majority of our politicians believe that this is

a mistake, that there are no red lines, that russia must now be defeated on the battlefield in ukraine, on ukrainian territory, and thereby ignite this fascist contagion forever, because putin will not survive defeat in ukraine. americans directly write in their main publications. affairs, we have to wait until putin dies and only then changes will be possible, because we cannot defeat him by military means. for a superpower, for a superpower, for a world gendarme - it is, well, to be honest, to put it mildly, directly a shameful position, especially since it is paid for with the blood of our soldiers, so in this situation, well, let's say, the different approaches of the west and ukraine in the strategies of victory are obvious. but this does not mean that we should be rude or fool our allies, because i am sorry, we have been alive here for these two and a half years only because

the americans came to our aid literally in the first month of the war, and most of the weapons and most of the money in our budget - it is theirs, so we should be grateful to them, the other question is that we would like more, it is true, but here the question arises from their side, which in you strategy what should you actually do, because in order to even become a member of nato, you have to stop military actions, because the country is not accepted, well, with military actions, the territory of the nation can be accepted, but without the territory that is currently under occupation, see , as the example of germany shows, i once told you about this in my own way, two- thirds of germany joined nato, after 50 years 1/3 of the soviet colony of the gdr broke through the wall and... begged there for a zone of security, wealth and tolerance, democracy, in this case there is such a scenario, but

look, only the president can tell you this, who has all the information about our resources, about external resources, about challenges, about everything else, but that's what our problem is, the problem is, and why does the fair say that we need something will show, the problem is that volodymyr oleksandrovich has both plus and minus, which are called the same. he is an artist. in the 22nd and part of the 23rd year, it saved us, because he was a wonderful speaker of the heroic ukrainian people and the heroic armed forces of ukraine. enabling army professionals to do their thing. then he again wrote the script for the winning series. in the last series, he personally, no one else, has to leave the state. flag to the state border in 1991, all those who could have been close to him at the same time are removed from their positions, starting with the lieutenant, ending with

syrskyi and budanov, and vumerov, too, and vumerov, and well, in short, and the head of the ministry of foreign affairs, list as many as you want, all those who, at least a little, people begin to recognize and value them for something, are removed from this scenario, because there must be a hero. one main a hero, and you will understand, everyone else is a fake, so there is no point in talking to us, they just tell us where to go, your job is to go to the trenches, and your job is to applaud me, and yours is praising me at the marathon, yours is paying money, yours is pressuring buttons in the parliament, and this policy of series one after another, which is not supported by a general mobilization, in this case i am not talking about the troops, in general ... military mobilization, it is now hitting the masters. i dare to say that the main thing at the front is not the shortage of shells, although it is very large, not the shortage of equipment, although it is very

big, not a shortage of personnel due to incomplete mobilization, not a shortage of fortifications and not even a shortage of drones, the biggest shortage of faith that the authorities in kyiv have a plan to win, and they are counting on us. it seems to me that this is the moment when the president should have...addressed the nation, as he did in the 22nd, to unite it, to explain his plan for victory, so that everyone, including such critical opposition, like me, and up to his turbadurs from the bank, were in the same formation, because we all want to win, because the elections will be later, first you have to save the country, but unfortunately, look, there is such a formula, it is impossible to win both the war and the election at the same time, and each leader chooses. sequence, so it seems to me that president zelenskyi and his team first want to win another presidential election, and then somehow with war. this means that

he is not a statesman, but a political leader. we will now talk about the election, i will remind our viewers that we are conducting polls throughout our broadcast, we are asking you this, do you support the idea of ​​economic defense against mobilization, yes, no, everything is quite simple on youtube, either yes or no, write your own opinion in the comments under this video, if you watch us on tv 08021 381, if you support the idea of ​​economic defense against mobilization, no 0800 211 382, all calls to these numbers are free, the british edition... iconevist writes about the prospect of holding elections in ukraine, presidential elections already next year, what do the british write? despite the fact that on tuesday all major political parties agreed to postpone the elections until the end of the war, mr. zelensky is said to be considering the possibility of holding presidential elections next year to strengthen his power, the publication writes. you, yuriy vitaliyovych, do you think zelensky will be able to hold elections in the 25th year?

there are such signals, a week ago we received information that the election headquarters at the bank for the first time received its salary for the start of preparations for the presidential elections. yes, of course, like any serious party, the electoral headquarters is not dissolved after the election, but somehow there is at a minimum is alive, at the moment when the preparations for the elections begin, it usually begins to function, unfold. and so on, well , our election headquarters basically went to the front, we have 2,500 party members now in the active army, and here we receive such information, then we see the decision of the cec to revise the voter register, well, that’s not the case, there are clarifications of precincts for now, i.e. then for one statement, then another, then we see a mass clearing of the information field and recognition... of figures

who have at least some rating, all this leads to the idea that something is being prepared, and with what we hear from the ears of the people, from the employees of the president's office, only presidential elections are planned, no others, neither parliamentary nor local, why? this has been known for a long time, we talked about it many times when the question was whether the president is legitimate, yes, he is legitimate, but not because of his elections, that is, while the war is going on, he performs the powers of the president. parliamentary elections during wartime are prohibited by the constitution, but presidential elections are not prohibited by the constitution, they are prohibited only by the special time law, and i have always said, what's the difference, everything is the same in wartime , you can't, for example, divide the army into those who vote for one party and for the other, how will they go on the attack together tomorrow, this brotherhood

can't be stabbed on such... problems, even more so, they cannot be forced to vote for someone who is ordered by the commander, and even worse, if they are excluded from the process at all, although they also have such a strange idea, because what to do with 8 million people abroad, what to do with voter lists in general , you can imagine how many displaced people from the east of ukraine and from center to the west, and where, where to look for them, who will control them, there are a lot of questions, but this is all technique, i return to this thesis again. "the statesman thinks how to win the war, even at the cost of his rating, as cherchen, who is so loved in banking, did in his time, and the politician thinks how to win the presidential elections, including at the cost of territorial concessions in ukraine. i'm afraid that what lies ahead not just elections, but a referendum on the neutral status of ukraine,

as a condition for the end of the war from putin, combined with the presidential elections, all this will be packed, i really want to be wrong, but it is very similar, about the fact that nato is facing impossible tasks, not because ukraine cannot be accepted into nato, because it cannot be done in a month or two, and nato will accept us, give us such a list of weapons, in such and such quantity, give us so much money, if you don't give us... then you have abandoned us, and therefore we are forced to go, taking care of the people, of course, to negotiations , at the negotiations we hear the demand for neutral status, and neutral status - this is a referendum, which means a cease -fire is necessary, which means no extension of martial law, which means a referendum with simultaneous presidential elections, such a scenario is now widely debated in political circles, but what about the constitution, which states that we are joining

nato, so this is a referendum for... not the constitution, that's what i'm talking about, the referendum.