ash gives fresh breath. lakalut active plus - action that you feel immediately. there are discounts on decatelene of up to 15% in pharmacies psyllanyk, pam and oskad.

glory to ukraine, dear tv viewers, on the air of the tv channel, the program studio zahid, we will analyze the most important events of this week: the world once again found itself on the threshold of the third world war, in particular today we will talk about the iranian-israeli conflict and the corresponding consequences, in particular for the security of ukraine, therefore that the enemy of our enemy is our friend. in addition, we will discuss... and an extremely difficult story with abramovich's mission, how it can affect the consciousness of representatives of certain western elites, of course, we will talk about what is called president zelensky's victory plan, and how washington will react to it and what specific steps our american partners will take , in addition to this , today we will also talk about an extremely important issue for polish-ukrainian relations, the issue of exhumation in volyn. today's guests of zahid studio are mark feigin and lukasz adamskyi. the tv channel is now on the air

a figure of the russian opposition in emigration, a former member of the state duma, and a well-known video blogger, mark feigin, will work. glory to ukraine, mark, glad to see and hear. glory to the heroes, i am glad to welcome anton, i am glad to greet all the viewers of the channel. well, mark, you know, our tireless doomsday clock shows the beginning of armageddon or the apocalypse without a single minute, and the events in the middle east have shown how serious everything is. at the same time, we understand that the united states has become extremely powerfully involved in the situation with the containment of iran, yes, well, they have at least its air defense systems on its aircraft carrier group, yes, iran is now thinking, but here i wanted to talk not so much about iran or the united states, but about the situation, how it can affect the ukrainian-russian war, so we understand that iran with on the one hand, it is an ally of russia, it...

provides it with ballistic missiles, on the other hand, we understand that the state of israel has extremely tense relations with iran, but on the other hand, it communicates quite calmly with the russian federation or the same north korea, and accordingly, according to your estimates, how the situation or the threat of a large, full-scale, bloody apocalyptic war in the middle east can affect the situation with the russian-ukrainian war, in particular, when we still think that the conflict in the near in the east will not reach the transformation into a more global world war, will not have such an impact, but this does not mean that the events there do not affect the situation in ukraine, and i would say that from a military point of view they can have a very positive effect, it is a simple linear scheme, according to which if israel retaliates on iranian territory in the coming days, there may be military. objects, or objects of energy

infrastructure, oil and so on, and among these objects there may be those engaged in the production of weapons supplied to the russian federation, namely ballistic missiles, drones, components for them, which they are killing ukrainians, so it is very beneficial for ukraine for this strike to take place, for israel to lead to this strike and destroy at least part of the military industrial infrastructure iran, well, it is obvious, politically, of course, a loss. in this theater for russia, and russia is directly involved, and moscow is involved in the events in the middle east, it is quite obvious, its direct military allies are fighting, this is iran, and hezbollah, and hamas, and partly related to this is syria, where they are russian troops, and the same iranian queer. undoubtedly, a loss in one of the geopolitical theaters will affect the situation in ukraine. this means that moscow, although directly involved in the war,... may lose somewhere,

and it is possible that its interests, to put it mildly, may be harmed, since its allies will lose, sooner or later the main one of them will lose in the person of moscow, well, that too. direct enough logic. israel does maintain this contact with moscow. the logic here is simple. we have 100 hamas hostages. moscow is holding back what seems to be israel, in my opinion, the wrong way of looking at things, but this is my opinion, and i do not impose it on anyone, that moscow is holding back both iran and other players in the middle east from going through some line in principle, as i understand it, this is the case exclusively only about iran, and one way or another.

considering the deaths of all its leadership members, now it does not pose such a threat, it is the threat of activists, the weapons that are there, the accumulation of a large amount of money, by the way, they receive from drug trafficking... in general, now hezbollah does not have the strength to oppose israel, so the operation in south lebanon will be successful. i think that as a result of what will happen, relations between jerusalem and kyiv, both in military and other terms, will become closer. this is objective. and this will happen if the role and influence of moscow in the region will decrease, not increase, but decrease, i mean in the middle east, then israel has nothing to fear, it will then be able to more openly support ukraine, at the request of common allies, primarily washington, so that with military supplies ,

the exchange of intelligence information and other means to still share with ukraine, to help ukraine in the confrontation. and this eastern despotism, moscow. it can affect. the obstacle now is the netanyahu government. let's put it bluntly, because the opposition forces are just talking about changes in relations with moscow, which is considered responsible for many events this year. starting from october 7, when hamas, and hamas under the direct control of moscow not only, but also including, attacked southern israel and killed more than a thousand people. of course, moscow did not prevent this. she could or not, in my opinion she could, probably in the opinion of the israeli leadership she also could, but the preservation of this communication with moscow seems to israel to be illusory, in my opinion, that it gives the opportunity to somehow influence the situation from the inside, from the side of its enemies, i think it

not so, but that is a matter of diplomacy, a matter of great politics. perhaps as a result of this war. and by the results of this aggravation it will be clear, maybe we don't know something. and this is an extremely correct and useful formula in order to somehow try to outline the current disposition, we don't know a lot, there was an extremely important visit, well, for example, whether there are nuclear weapons or not, that's who can say for sure 100%, i i think he knows it, biden knows it, he knows it. and putin knows this, yes, well, we already understand what the consequences can be, but simply returning to the politics of washington, we understand that there was an extremely important visit of the ukrainian delegation, in particular president zelenskyi, who was dedicated to two super important cases, one

case being permits to fire at russian military facilities beyond the urals, let's call it so delicately, there or under the mongolian border, where, in principle, swarms of our drones do not arrive. the second moment is undoubtedly a winning plan, but here we are entering the thin air of secrets and conspiracy, yes, because in the white house they said: we watched, studied, familiarized ourselves, there are interesting points, but everything remains, so to speak, confidential, well, conspiracy theorists multiply here, it remains to add, you know, eternally cheerful professors who have already put putin in the refrigerator for the tenth time. so, i would like to... start with this super-important case, which is called that the strikes on the territory of russia, in particular on military facilities, putin's hysterical reaction immediately appeared, he changed the nuclear weapon on the fly, literally on the air, on the fly the strategy of the russian federation,

in particular, on the application of both strategic and tactical means, and accordingly, without even having it changed under his hands, all on purpose, this means... that putin began to lose his temper in order to stop this decision. yes, and of course, he primarily wanted to influence the event that makes the decision to grant rights to ukraine. definitely to the west, because it definitely does not make an impression on ukraine, the nuclear threats coming from moscow, of course, against the background of 2 and a half years of war and hundreds of thousands of victims, will certainly not have such an effect, especially since everyone understands that let's say this, putin definitely realizes that the use of nuclear weapons and the threat of it for... these are different things. he tries to achieve the maximum effect, the maximization of this

effect primarily from rhetoric, from threats, and not from the application itself. because the rhetoric is backwards. you can always play back, as piaskov did after putin's speech. there it has come to the point that even drones can be considered a reason behind which nuclear weapons can be used. then it started. but no, it is not necessary to exaggerate everything, not like that understood, and so on. that is, then it says that verbal rhetoric itself is a weapon, but the use of nuclear weapons is irreversible, you cannot play back, and how are you going to do it, and therefore those experts who believe that this is exclusively a tool of pressure on public opinion, to the west , on the establishment and elites of the west, and that this is not necessarily a bridge to application, most likely they are right. putin is not ready to use nuclear weapons because the consequences for... question: do these threats make an impression on the west and

this nuclear blackmail? if they did not provide the opportunity to use it for strikes deep into russia, then it means that it has some effect, it certainly has some significance when washington and its allies make a decision. another issue is the internal political situation in the united states itself. after all, there is an election campaign going on there. are fighting with the republicans, candidates trump and kamala harris are fighting, and a very shaky advantage, if harris has it, for example, has yet to materialize, so by november 5, by the day elections, until the results of the elections in the usa, this factor will probably be decisive in the matter of giving ukraine the right to use western means to strike deep into the territory of russia. why, because they don't want a built-in situation, they are afraid that trump will come, and not only because... the democrats will simply lose to trump, because the strategy will also change, we already

understand this, the strategy that will be directed at supporting ukraine. if the democrats, with all the criticism, with all the claims against them, with their indecision and so on, above all with the biden administration to biden himself. after all, we are talking about the fact that this is support that is institutionalized, declared and implemented, well, as they can, it will change under trump, already now, based on his... sometimes they cancel the meeting with zelensky, then they hold the opposite, zelensky's statement is quite fair, because he said: listen, trump doesn't have a program, but really what is it, trump himself answers, everything has its own time, at one time you and i spoke honestly about the fact that a full-scale invasion is being prepared, you know there... no, no, they didn't wrap it it’s all in the paper, they didn’t talk about what

you think and the economy will win, i.e. putin’s body language, he is quite eloquent, his body language, yes, and putin’s hysteria, it happens directly on the faces of those of his supporters who sat in on this security forces, and even here they didn’t even fly by, everyone sat like that, yes, yes, yes, you know, the years of the war, its course, its intermediate results, kyiv was not taken in three days, it must be clearly said that the system itself has changed , after all, she changed, the war changed her, that is, now it is more personified, it is totalitarian, this has finally formed in it , despite the fact that some signs indicate that it is an authoritarian, rigid dictatorial regime, but there are still totalitarian elements, and imagine now... what in putin's environment can it is impossible,

inadmissible, to be at least a little bit beyond doubt, it is on the one hand. and then, as we have already seen from the type of such systems, the more rigidly you strengthen the system, as stalin did, for example, then you try to copy any risks associated with the threats caused to your system, i.e. you remove the most loyal, shoot and imprison the most loyal. why and what if they will return to the disloyal, start looking for ways to get rid of you? especially since external conditions contribute to this. putin has no way out, the elites have a way out, they can hide, then pretend that they are not guilty of anything, to whom will putin shift the responsibility from himself, to whom? putin has no way out, the elites have, even a certain bortnikov has a way out, so he can not be hanged, shot, imprisoned for

life, he will show his mossad id, do you know if there is a third passport? by the way, the logic is so interesting, maybe they really have a masadiv certificate, but putin does not have such an opportunity, even though he had a fan of these passports and certificates, he has no chance, because for putin this is a fundamental, unavoidable, fatal situation , for which he has to go to vabank, but for the elite it is not a move to vabank, the elite can jump off all this, i am retired, i am in the garden, i... sorry, i did not make the decision about the war, putin made it. that's why you mentioned the events of february 22, when they were about to happen were deciding the recognition of the republics of the ldpr, and in fact we understood that the issue of starting a war was being decided, and putin needed to show it on tv. putin needed to involve his entire entourage in order to make a collective decision, so that it could always be

said that it was a collective decision, it was not my personal decision. now he already has it. there is no such reflection, he does not need to try to portray something, everyone already understands that the war is his area of ​​responsibility, and of course, all those who stand behind him, he was already going to fight three days, at that moment he tried to use the old approaches, collective, collegial decision-making, and now he cannot lose, the elite can lose the war in ukraine, and what will happen to it, and that is what, they will take moscow, no, the loss of russia is simply not the fulfillment of putin's goals to capture ukraine, do you understand? and what does summer lose from this, the whole environment, it does not matter whether you are a member of the security council or an ordinary employee of some district administration, well, he does not lose anything, he stays where he was, works and does what he used to do, but here is putin loses everything, you understand, here is mark, the goals of the war and the goals of putin, here i discussed with my

american friends the situation with zelensky’s victory plan and so on, and they assessed it like this: they say, in general, the idea is not bad, a key story, where there will be elements of not just deterring the kremlin , and the interest of the kremlin to enter the negotiation process. we understand , so america should hurt putin so much that he would be forced. but, as they say, not a fact. yes, we understand that putin failed to achieve those military goals, military and political goals that he set for himself. accordingly, the operational situation on the field'. has changed, we have entered a long, bloody war, yes, and our prospects are quite, you know, dim, according to your opinion, the victory plan, putin's reaction, and what is called, you know, very different signals, from the bottom scholz, well, i don't want to list all those people who would like, so to speak, to start a certain negotiation

process, you know, i'll tell you this, you know, i 'll tell you this, putin would not pay attention to the victory plan at all... so if it concerned the front line in ukraine, aid to ukraine and even an attack on the territory of russia, but still without a bridgehead on the territory of the russian federation. two districts in the kursk region, almost 1000 km, where battles are currently ongoing in attempts to push the armed forces of ukraine beyond the state border. i guess so. putin would treat this leniently, as he treated the peace formula, the august events, and the start of the armed forces operation. he contemptuously, even, i would say, with some ultimatum, insolent tone, offered three conditions which must be fulfilled for these negotiations to begin. and everyone understood that these conditions were not

feasible. i will remind them, on the eve of the peace summit in lucerne, he said: free the four regions in the administrative borders, that is, withdraw parts of the armed forces from there. cancel all sanctions, and first, from the very beginning of the negotiations, accept the commitment of ukraine's non-aligned status. that is, in fact, about the end of ukraine's sovereignty. let's call a spade a spade. ukraine outside nato and ukraine in nato are two different ukraines. and everyone understands this perfectly, no one is not stupid. and this is where the kursk happened. region, and actually, how can he continue to behave as brazenly, taking into account the fact that you do not fully know how long the troops will remain there, which will be lost, or whether units of the armed forces will advance further. and suddenly they will enter the bryansk region, and what if something completely unbelievable will happen, and suddenly, this was not believed before, but now it is a common place, foreign

troops have been on the territory of the russian federation for two months, occupying administrative centers, and it is certainly a disturbing, irritating factor that affects putin's decision-making, in a sense he has become more cautious, much more cautious and in public statements as well, if we are not talking about nuclear... blackmail, for example, judge for yourself, he says that it doesn't matter to us what bandits, bandos, some provocateurs from the ssu are doing, what provocateurs, what are you talking about, the war is going on, you occupied 20% of the territories of ukraine, yes, what did you want, this is the way, as he said, we will continue what we did on the front line in itself ukraine. at the same time, i believe that the kursk region and the situation there is the biggest challenge for him after two years of war. talk that the war would spill over into russia itself, they came true, that's what they are, yes, now, if sooner or later there is a decision to strike deep into the territory of russia, then it is absolutely clear that

these strikes can lead to the continuation of the operation, in the course of which the armed forces of ukraine will occupy new territories in russia, move further to kursk or to kurchatov or to other large cities on the territory of kurdistan region of course, this is an irritating factor, and the plan to win was not easy. slogan, and some threat, because if we are talking only about ukraine, then win, don't win, you are liberating your territory, here you can suffer, and the population of the european part of russia can turn out to be the object of war, and not an episodic, pin strike by drones, rockets that carry 200 to 500 kg of explosives are nothing, and a 50 kg drone, if you compare, there are different types of drones, but nevertheless, it is absolutely obvious. it will be a pity greater, taking into account the presence of foreign troops on the territory of arref. could putin be afraid of some indignation inside using this situation, surrounded by those

who are not happy with him, to get rid of him. for example, the troops of the armed forces of ukraine reached kursk. what then? it is only 50-55 km from the same suzha, not such a long distance. and from kursk to moscow - 500. i'm not saying that this will happen, i'm just talking about the political influence of this factor. and that's why the victory plan is perceived in a different way, there is a different feeling, which putin catches on and understands that in reality not everything is so simple. the fact that you take ugledar and pokrovsk will not solve the problem of the kurdish region, it is not an automatic solution, they are not connected. you can capture a few more cities before the new year or after it, although there will probably be a winter break, but this does not mean that you will automatically solve the problem of the presence of foreign troops on the territory of the russian federation, their occupation of a significant part of the territory of about thousands of square meters. meters, that's the problem. but there is still such a moment, yes, if indeed there will be some or other additional tools or additional, so to speak, moments that will interest putin, and he will be able to go into one

or another, be it behind the scenes, be it through the americans, be it through these or other intermediary countries, such as switzerland, negotiating or a pseudo-negotiation process, well, he can't just jump out of the war, explaining to the fascist population, which, i don't know, for years... until the full-scale invasion was fooled by all his propaganda, he can't say to them: well, you know, we a little here decided to rethink our attack on ukraine, let's somehow withdraw the troops from the new subjects of the federation, that is, we understand that this act is illegal, but that's how they behaved in order to completely cut off all ways of retreat, i don't know, for patrusheva or someone else who could have conversations with bjorns. there or on ryshkin, we understand that, and this is the moment of exit, on the other hand we understand that putin is ready to play for a long time, that is, well, we have not

agreed on anything, so everything will continue in about the same tempo long, bloody meat grinder. well, this is definitely a dead end, specifically for putin, for the elite, for russia itself, for the population, not a dead end. here, you know, there is such a thesis that putin... will sell anything to the population as a victory, not everything, still not everything, here i am of the opinion that you cannot sell absolutely everything, you cannot portray absolutely everything as a victory, if it is only a concession, a loss, a compromise and so on, that is, he cannot sell everything due to his political position, he was really proclaiming something completely different, de facto they were going to take kyiv in three days, three days or a month, it doesn't matter, now we are talking about a truism that ukraine in general... is not capable of resisting and so on, this did not happen, what does this prove? that ukraine is a full-fledged state that continues to resist, and even if you imagine that there will be no allies, how

will you manage it... there is no other way to conquer it. putin has nothing to offer ukrainian society to change its attitude to the war, to the government, to the union with russia, there is none tool for putin, this is certainly a dead end. yes, it could have been a forced entry into kyiv, the installation of a puppet government. and that would give some kind of a chance, and if it didn't, they didn't even think it was possible, that 's the thing, they didn't have a back-up plan, putin didn't have a back-up plan, in fact, eliminating all those who started with him this war, and patrushev, and shoigu and so on, this is precisely his attitude, well, gerasimov is holding on, i think, until the new year, he will also be changed, because the symbol of defeat, failure in ukraine must be visualized, for

for putin, this is a dead end, there... to resist and insist that this peace be concluded on his terms. of course, putin is looking for peace talks, of course he wants this peace process and an end to the war, because it gives him relief, but he does not yet see or consider another way, because if he makes any compromise, allowing not to release those new subjects of the russian federation, but simply agrees with the sovereignty of ukraine, then this... all this is a defeat, he then lost ukraine, you understand, because of course, the occupation of new territories by no one never admits, that is, legally he does not solve this issue, and he has nothing to do with them , what do you think putin could reach, so we understand that there is a public part, there is a non-public part, but there...

this story about stopping the war, a ceasefire, people will stop dying, we have heard this rhetoric, they will not stop dying, and the war in this sense will not stop, and will continue, this is necessary to create an atmosphere in which ukraine looks like an opponent of war. koromovka says that everyone is ready, but only ukraine is resisting, this definitely a deception, a large-scale deception, kremlin intelligence, which cannot be followed, because i emphasize once again, it is directed against ukraine, because it is empty talk, a simple litmus, a simple example of how this can be achieved, very simply, i am

sure, i suspect there is ... sider information that putin was offered many times to stop mutual shelling, that is, you stop shelling the territory of ukraine, and ukraine stops shelling the territory of russia, without using drones, missiles. moscow always refused, always. here you are fight on the front line and fight. let's define a zone no more than 20-30 km along the front line, but no more strikes on the territory of ukraine, even in kherson, even in okhmaditya, even in other places. why not agree on this, why not stop destroying the whole country? putin no longer agrees, that is, what this shows, it shows that he does not want any peace, he does not want any cease-fire, he does not want an end to bloodshed. i think that such proposals will be introduced. there is already information that a group of semi-loyalists is being formed moscow intellectuals. i will not even name them, everyone knows them, who should repent in european capitals and form a non-governmental

position of peace. all this is also launched by the kremlin, and the mandate of those people will be, relatively speaking, they are just, you know, a wandering tent, or will they represent someone's specific signature there? of course, because this is what abramovych is doing, he is assigned to do it, he is pulling these people, this is specifically what abramovych and the persons connected with him are doing, i.e. it is a series of harsh officials who are involved in this the senses are connected, probably surkov has something to do with it.