greetings to everyone from espresso, this is news, annaeva melnyk is with you, and i start this issue with the following: the russian army is attacking kherson again, the dnipro district of the city is under fire. as a result of the impact , a 61-year-old man was injured, he has an explosive skull mask. injuries, as well as contusion. medics provided assistance to the victim on the spot. he will be treated on an outpatient basis. one person died, and three others were injured as a result of shelling in kharkiv oblast. in the morning, the enemy targeted the village of borovai, zom district. as a result of what a 56-year-old man died, kupiansk was also hit. three civilians were injured. a 54-year-old man was injured. another victim was hospitalized, another

one refused to be hospitalized with cluster munitions, the enemy attacked the village of novoosynove. residential buildings, commercial buildings and cars were damaged. two men were wounded in kupyansk , kharkiv region. an enemy fpv drone hit near a bus stop where civilians were staying, the regional police said. in victims shrapnel wounds, one of them was delivered. to kharkiv hospital. as a result of the shelling, a shop and a car were also damaged. the occupiers injured a 61-year-old woman in golyai-pol in zaporizhzhia. as the head of the region , ivan fedorov, reported, the enemy dropped an fpv drone on a resident of dronn. the victim has numerous injuries and a contusion. she is in the hospital. the espresso tv channel and the vesna charitable fund opened a fundraiser for the purchase. modern drones and

electronic warfare systems for the third separate assault brigades of the 110th and 47th tsu brigades. the defenders in the donetsk direction every day hold back enemy attacks, defend our freedom and future. it was these soldiers who defended the avdiiv direction in the spring. the brigades urgently need drones and modern means of countering enemy drones. our goal is uah 3.5 million. you, our viewers, have already donated 2,480. there are no small donations, join using the qr code you see on the screen. good health, dear ukrainians, we, the fighters of the first assault battalion, the third separate assault brigade, who will defend our native land on frontline, we urgently need your help, we need means of radio-electronic warfare against enemy small bpolas and komikazu drones, we really ask for your help, glory to ukraine! glory to the heroes, ukrainian

scouts destroyed the russian anti-aircraft missile complex osa at the front. soldiers of the special unit of the main directorate of intelligence of the ministry of defense of the wing aimed at him with the help of the fpvidron. gur informs. he mentioned the cost of the enemy air defense system at 10 million dollars. ready for resistance, by the day of the territorial defense forces on the independence square. called a peaceful action to draw attention to the fate of prisoners, missing persons, released from captivity and tru servicemen. in the center of the capital, a joint prayer of the chaplain for the dead was heard, amateurs and wives, missing persons and prisoners prepared creative performances. i would like to note that the day of the territorial defense forces of ukraine is celebrated annually on the first sunday of october. if the thesis that the

defense forces, or the army of the country, is a reflection of society is correct, then the territorial defense force, it seems to me, is exactly that example, one of clans, clans of troops, and in fact are the personification of the entire country, because they are people of different social strata, different professions, different. we have had this idea for a long time to hold a peaceful action, our association goes together with the authorities, we are not looking for betrayal, we are looking for the question why it is impossible, we are trying to change something, because there are many bills that need changes at the moment, in kyiv there is a powerful the downpour flooded the streets in several districts, some of them were completely impassable, it also flooded shopping and entertainment venues. centers for

elimination of the consequences of bad weather, city services are working in an intensified mode, the capital administration says, but the storm sewer system cannot immediately cope with such an amount of water on the avenue. of science , a pipe also burst, due to the accident , water supply to several residential buildings was temporarily stopped for the residents, drinking water is being delivered by tanker truck, the damage is being repaired by experts of kyivvodokanal, precipitation in the region is expected until the end of the day. a bloody terrorist attack in israel killed a 20-year-old girl, and at least ten people were injured as a result of a terrorist attack at a bus station. about this let me know local media, the event happened in the city of bersheva, in the south of the country. an unknown man opened fire, the attacker was eliminated on the spot in a few minutes, he was alone during the attack. according to the media, the crime was committed by a 29-year-old bedouin, a citizen of israel,

ahmat said akabi. law enforcement officers establish the motives of the crime. a new deadly disease has been recorded in china by hong kong. a dangerous strain of streptococcus group b is spreading , local media reports. 91 people have already sought help, four have died. the disease affects the joints. it is noted that the infection could have spread from freshwater fish traded in the local bazaar. a story about love, talent and war. a presentation of the book was held as part of the lviv book forum 2024. elena cherninskaya, the hot summer of normandy, the cold winter of ukraine. the writer worked on the novel even before the full-scale russian invasion, but later there were episodes about the war. espresso correspondent iryna davosyr attended the event. and he will tell us all the details. greetings,

colleague, greetings to the viewers of the espresso tv channel. now we are at the lviv book forum 2024 and had the opportunity to visit. presentation of the book by the writer olena cherninka, which is called "hot summer of normandy, cold winter of ukraine". the presentation was moderated by the founder of the stary lev publishing house maryana savka, the writer herself said that she wrote this book, she started writing even before the beginning of the full-scale invasion and saw with her own eyes the hot summer of normandy, which she describes in her book. the writer also adds that all locations and all characters have prototypes in real life. and... she saw it with her own eyes and that's why she had it able to describe them so effectively. the book itself is a romance novel that tells a story of hardship, a story of love, trauma and war. the main character is a young singer lilya, who has a unique talent and wins

numerous talent contests, but her father uses it to earn money, this girl's father is also a copy of her lover. boy, however, if you can talk about the father in a negative way, then the main character perceives her beloved in a positive way. olena cherninka also emphasized on the fact that for her, writing is such a psychological retreat and an opportunity to return from the gray everyday life that is now in her life. the book also often describes solomiya krusylnytska and her family, her father and sister, since the heroine of the work lila herself is compared. often with solomiya krushelnytska and they say that she is the second such singer. olena cherninka also added that she is waiting for the return of her son, who is missing, and plans to write a book when he returns and call it lemberg's return. i have everything for now, thanks

i will pass on the word studio. iryna dovasyr, espresso correspondent from the 31st international literary festival lviv bookforum about the presentation of elena's new book. cherninskaya a shopping complex caught fire in caspiansk, russia. the fire covered 700 m2. the store is on fire, soft toys and household appliances were also affected. according to local reports, three firefighters were injured. two are in the hospital with burns, the third with carbon monoxide poisoning. 39 specialists and 13 pieces of equipment work on site. and look for more interesting videos at espresso's youtube channel, a must. subscribe, because there are live ether broadcasts, all news releases, programs and special projects that can only be seen here, as well as short videos on hot topics in the shorts section, share them and be sure to comment.

and you can always read more about important things on our website espresso tv, because my colleagues work for you around the clock, also subscribe to our channels in social networks, be close and see you at 6 p.m. editorial. working on the final release, stay tuned! events, events happening right now and affect our lives, of course, the news feed reports about them, but it is not enough to know what is happening, it is necessary to understand. antin borkovskii and invited experts soberly assess the events, analyze them, modeling our future. every saturday at 1:10 p.m. with a repeat at 10:00 p.m. studio event with anton borkovsky on espresso. an unusual look at the news.

good health, ladies and gentlemen, my name is mykola veresin, sharp presentation of facts and competent opinions. for example, if mykola verezom had done so, he would have gone to prison. a special look at events in ukraine, so there is no need to say that the fish rots from the head, no, not from the head, and beyond. and then who is china? my heart hurts. all this, this marathon with mykola veresny, saturday 17:10, sunday 18:15 at espresso. the level of conflict between volodymyr zelenskyi and the republican party has significantly escalated. zelensky should have written a personal letter to donald trump. he forced volodymyr zelensky to undergo a certain public humiliation, begging him for a meeting many times. trump tower, that is, on the territory donald trump. trump now acts as a private person, and he has a very good relationship with putin, as he said. if donald

trump wins, america first. hardly anyone else in america could have uttered those words after two years of russia's war against ukraine. you are watching radio svoboda's weekly video podcast, state situation. today we are talking about what does donald trump mean by a fair deal for ukraine? and why was ukraine not mentioned at all at the vice-presidential debate in the usa? well, the navigator in a full-time situation will be a professor of political science serhii kudelya of baylor university in texas. sergey, congratulations. hello, rostislav. greetings. so what do we have? we have the fact that volodymyr zelenskyi's visit to the united states became politically balanced precisely because of the meeting. at the last minute with republican candidate donald trump. by the way,

trump said after the meeting that he and zelensky both want a fair deal. moreover, trump repeated twice, speaking about russia's war against ukraine, that this agreement would be fair for ukraine and added that it would happen at the right time time. and zelenskyi said, by the way, that it is important to understand that it is putin who has come to ukraine, that it is russia... is present, russian troops are in ukraine, in ukraine, and that this is important to understand, whether it is true, serhiy, we have, yes so to speak, transformation, some progress by trump in terms of a better understanding of the nature of the russian war against ukraine, who is the aggressor, who is occupied by the occupied territory, well, maybe he understands better, yes, but the context of this phrase is still important. he said of a fair deal after how he has already emphasized that both

volodymyr zelensky and vladimir putin seek peace, that is, he believes that in fact both sides want to stop the war, and when he spoke about a fair agreement, it was clearly understood that it was about taking into account the interests of not only ukraine when signing this agreement, but also the interests of the russian federation, we remember, we remember, he also mentioned about... tango that tango should be danced by two sides, that is, he emphasizes that for that in order to come to an agreement, it is necessary to take into account putin's interests, it is necessary interests to take into account the interests of the kremlin, and with putin, as he said, by the way, he has very good relations, good relations, hardly anyone else in america, any other western leader could utter these words after two years of russia's war against ukraine. ugh. when trump talks about the right time, what is there? what time is necessary for him, is it the time of his victory in the elections in the united states

of america, is it some time of possible successes of ukraine on the battlefield, is it the time of the weakening of russia, the moment of some kind of weakening, what is this right time for donald trump? trump is now acting as a private individual, he has no right even under american law to engage in any foreign policy matters. initiatives, to act as some kind of mediator, so obviously it's about the fact that he needs to win the elections first and form his administration, determine who will be the key... persons responsible for foreign policy, we don't really have a clear idea of ​​who may be donald trump's national security adviser, who may be secretary of state. when all these issues are resolved, it seems to me, only then does trump understand that some further steps can be taken to solve this war. still, it is important that the meeting between zelenskyi and trump took place in

new york, but here, so to speak, there were certain compromises from the ukrainian side, first of all, it was necessary to write: zelenskyi a personal letter to donald trump, to be signed by volodymyr, and trump, by the way, he published it later on the social network, made it public, although it was a private letter. next, time meeting, zelenskyi had to extend his stay overseas for one day. next, the meeting place is new york. zelenskyi was already in new york at the un general assembly, went to washington. then, in order to meet with trump , he returned to new york again, and even in new york itself. the place of the trump tower meeting, that is, on the territory of donald trump, but still, having made these compromises, having gone, so to speak, to this meeting with trump, it was important, the meeting itself was important for conveying to trump the ukrainian position on war, isn't it, of course, and trump wanted to clearly demonstrate by this behavior that

this meeting is more important for volodymyr zelenskyi himself than for him, he forced volodymyr. to go to a certain public humiliation, begging him for a meeting many times, publicly sending such letters, and he also emphasized that he is ready to be quite tough in relation to ukraine, even on the eve of this meeting, because we heard accusations from the republican side towards volodymyr zelenskyi, towards ukraine in that they are interfering in the pre-election process in the united states, hence the level of conflict, the level of certain confrontation between. between volodymyr zelenskyi and the republican party significantly escalated in just a few days of his visit, so this meeting, it helped in a certain way to smooth out these differences, to demonstrate a certain readiness of trump for dialogue with the ukrainian side, but at the same time it hardly helped us to better understand what exactly the plans are does donald

trump have any ideas about ukraine? that is, the meeting was important for conveying ukraine's position to trump, but we... still don't know what we mean, what he means when he talks about his peace plan, right? absolutely, and we have to see a lot of different voices around donald trump, which sometimes do not connect with each other, and donald trump himself, as he said, refuses to talk about the details of his plan for ukraine yet. in an interview with the bbc, by the way, after the vice-presidential debate in new york, here is the son of donald trump. donald trump, jr., who plays such a key, one of the key roles in the election team donald trump, said: what are we doing in ukraine, we have already spent 250 billion dollars, or donald trump jr., donald trump jr., he represents this model of isolationist america, americans in isolation,

is it just a pro-russian wing, or is it or this and that? yes, donald trump jr. we see. has grown significantly in his political influence in the last few years, he now acts as a de facto representative of his father at many rallies in the united states and conducts an active political campaign, however you can hardly call him pro-russian or isolationist, he rather represents the idea of ​​such national selfishness, and because when he talks about $250 billion, he also says that prices in the united states have risen, people are short of money. in order to provide some basic needs, that is, this combination of such populism, economic populism and national selfishness, they say that the united states should spend money on itself, on its citizens, and not on countries that are very far from america. ugh, jens stoltenberg, who just left the post of nato secretary general, he was there for the longest time, more than a decade, 10

years, before leaving he gave an interview to an american publication. politician and said that europeans should not be afraid of trump, they should work with him, and as an example he gave the fact that donald trump, when he was president, he, for example, gave javelins, anti-tank systems, anti-tank missiles to ukraine, or indeed among america's allies, especially in europe, there is a certain fear of trump, and how is it to explain, there is a certain misunderstanding of how relations between you nato countries and the united states, this misunderstanding or apprehension in the case of the presidency of donald trump, and this apprehension was also demonstrated by the decision to appoint a new one. secretary general mark ruta, who is known for his rather good, warm relationship with donald trump, they represent very similar ideological, ideological-political parties, he is also

center-right, and he has experience working with donald trump when he was president of the united states, but it seems to me that the main concern, it is so related to the fact that the united states can withdraw from this union, although in fact donald trump has such powers, he as president can withdraw from any international agreement. how many are caused by the fact that the normative consensus that is the basis of nato, the normative consensus around the values ​​of democracy and freedom, it may gradually disintegrate, as many of donald trump's statements indicate that these values, around which western states unite, they for him personally are not fundamental, are not too important, and in principle he is even ready to question. the binding of the united states to certain states that are members of the alliance in the event that these states become a victim of aggression by third countries,

for example, the russian federation, and emphasize , it is emphasized, that the united states must first of all take care of their national security, and european countries, on the contrary, have to think about how to organize security for themselves, hence one of the key issues. probably refers to what europe, europe will be forced to look for or form new organizations or create new security tools, which would take care of first of all, which would provide certain guarantees to european states, that is, even in the matter of security, in the matter of nato, there will still be a principle if donald trump will win, america first, that is, america first, and nato is already there because of whom the second and third are there, right, am i right? and in fact, yes, in fact, these opinions are also widespread among american voters, because the last poll, for example, showed that

when asked whether the united states should intervene in foreign conflicts, a large number of americans said that we should actually think first about how to avoid war and negotiate, rather than trying to solve any foreign conflict. with the help of military intervention, and this is a certain skepticism of donald trump about nato, about the commitment of america, to this coalition alliance, to the allies, what is it for ukraine, that is, if america nato is not number one for ukraine in terms of alliances, in terms of alliances that for ukraine is it, where, to which alliance will it then aspire? well, this obviously puts the prospect of ukraine's nato membership on the back burner, since if trump is questioning his commitments to existing members of the alliance, it is unlikely that he will be ready to open the doors of the alliance to new countries, especially countries that are currently in a state of wars with other

states, that is, it is obvious that for ukraine ukraine will be forced to look for some new goals, to set new strategic tasks for itself, and which would go further and help it to establish possibly two hundred on a bilateral basis some. seek agreements on security issues, nor knock on the door of the alliance. the vice-presidential debate, we had tim walls, the governor of minnesota, and jd vance, the senator from zogaio, that's the democratic vice-presidential candidate and the republican vice-presidential candidate. ukraine and russia's war against ukraine were not discussed at all during the vice-presidential debate. mentioned, why ukraine, even the name ukraine itself, was not mentioned during the hour and a half of this debate? well, first of all, the format of these

debate, it was quite limited, an hour and a half, it was the only debate between the vice presidents, we also see that the escalation, the escalation in the middle east, the beginning of the military operation in lebanon, the possible, the possible war between iran and israel, all of that is coming out. .. it is the middle east conflict in the first place, there is a large jewish community in america, and israel is one of the key allies of the united states, to which the united states has certain obligations, so obviously this is the number one issue, and other foreign policy issues were also discussed, for example, for many americans, immigration is a foreign policy issue, and climate change is a foreign policy issue, and these issues ... were discussed in great detail during the debate, but perhaps ukrainians should be happy about the fact that ukraine is not actually mentioned because, since jd

vance...he's known for his critical statements about ukraine, and if the topic of ukraine had come up during the debate, it 's likely that he, like donald trump jr., would have insisted later on after the debate because it is necessary to stop the military support to ukraine and would criticize the ukrainian position, so it is quite likely that for ukraine, i think, it is precisely for the good that it was not mentioned during these debates, that it was not mentioned. during the debates, but still foreign policy aspects echoed not only the middle east. tim balls, a democrat, criticized the vacillation, which he said was causing confusion among us allies. when allies see that donald trump is turning to vladimir putin, to north korea, they see such wobbles regarding the joint coalition, he says. and republican jd vance, donald trump's vice-presidential candidate, says.

on the contrary, that wars did not start under trump and that there was stability in the world. donald trump, during his presidency, has effectively ensured stability in the world by establishing effective deterrence. which vision of america's foreign policy, so to speak, power more meets the expectations of the american public, and the average american, which vision did he like more. volsa or vance? well actually as in many issues, american society is divided here, and in matters of foreign policy there are very significant philosophical differences in how the us citizens look at the relations of the us with other countries, that is, the democratic camp, he represents the so-called so-called ville-e tradition woodro - wilson, the president who considered it necessary to take for the united states. to participate

in wars on the side of democracy, who promoted the ideas of democracy in the world, and it is from these views, from these positions that many democrats, and leaders, leaders of democrats believe that the united states should support this participation, this presence in the world. republicans , on the contrary, believe that the key is the protection of the usa's shores, and the interests of the united states should not actively spread beyond the territory of the usa, i.e. the emphasis is on strengthening one's own security and on avoiding any open confrontations with other states, it is very difficult to somehow reconcile these differences, so it is quite likely that waltz's speech, his foreign policy statements and jaydy vance's statements convinced them own voters, voters of the republican party, democratic, but here it is also important to note that it is unlikely to be a key

issue of the election. because more important issues like the economy, immigration, they are still at the top of the main priorities of american voters now, tim walls, he was such, he was called such a folkloric character, he was such a common man, he was liked by the average person , so to speak to the americans very much, but jady vance, he is a good speaker, he showed himself well as a speaker and has proven that he is a good speaker, still, what does the poll say... who won this debate, was it a tie or is someone the winner, what does the poll say? well, actually, each of those two candidates, he's shown some very positive qualities for jay davens, it was important to show that he's a moderate because he's been painted as a radical, that he's actually willing to negotiate or agree to a lot even with a democrat, his democratic opponent, this surprised

many observers. because there was consent sounded quite often in the answers of both trump and walt. volt, on the other hand, showed himself to a wider audience. he is unknown at the national level. and he demonstrated that he can speak competently and confidently on many issues, represent the position of kamela harris. and especially in matters such as the debate on democracy, when he asked jd vance directly whether he would accept joe biden's victory in the last one. elections and he refused to give an answer, precisely about such questions, these episodes actively are currently being discussed in the american congress, and they basically demonstrate that for both republicans and democrats, both candidates in principle spoke convincingly enough, and it is hardly possible to talk about the victory of one candidate or the other. clearly, regarding jady vance, they say that he, it was such a political investment even.