these occupiers joined the ranks of their army, but all on a voluntary basis, under different sauces, what they do there is all the same, it is unlimited, when, someday, the time will come when they will be forced to use mobilization next, so the increase in armed forces forces of the russian federation for us. does not bring anything good for ukraine, and we will see how they cope with this task, we must always strive for the armed forces of the russian federation to be successful, and they always lost, so i wish them not to succeed. how do you assess the situation at the front now? well, the situation directly in the eastern direction is... such that the armed forces

of the russian federation, they are constantly advancing in all directions, and in these directions, where they see that they can be successful, they are developing their success. directly, they are now carrying out offensive actions in the kupinsky direction, they are approaching the water obstacle like ticks with ticks, there is a small advance. there of the armed forces of the russian federation, as well as er, their intentions are to sharpen our group, this is in the direction of kurakhiv, where from the direction of hirnyk they will descend and close the encirclement ring, and accordingly the situation in the uglyadar area. i emphasize once again, the enemy, constantly attacking, in this way... if, conducting reconnaissance by combat,

finds out where it is possible to have success, where their offensive advance can be, and then he carries out such actions with such tactics, and the focal point is not used everywhere and small tank columns, and infantry, all this is happening, the enemy now has a threat in the kurakhiv direction, in the ughledar direction, there are... his threatening actions in the kupinsky direction, in order to stop the enemy, it is necessary, i emphasize once again, to beat the enemy, reducing his offensive potential with all types of military equipment that are in service with our brigades, which carry out tasks in the east, this is also artillery, of course it is unmanned aerial vehicles, this is also... anti-tank missile

complexes of various types, with different ranges, this is anti-tank grenade launchers, this is aviation, which the enemy respects us with, but it is all the same with us exists and it is applied, it is necessary to beat, reduce its combat potential, it is necessary to make decisions in each of the directions, and it is necessary to win. in your professional opinion, what's next? well, that's how i understand it, and our viewers will probably agree with me that now we are more in such a defensive position, we are forced to hold our positions, knock out resources from the russians, periodically we have to surrender our positions for this, how long will this last and whether the time will come someday when we will go ... on

the offensive, simply sweep them from the territory of ukraine. strategic defense is now underway, strategic defense operation. ah, in order for us to go on the offensive, i already talked about it, we need to stop the enemy. the enemy is stopped by reducing its offensive potential, for this it is necessary to inflict fire damage on it. in connection with the fact that the resource war is going on now. the russian federation has its own resource, plus additionally it receives a resource from its satellites, i.e. iran, north korea, and ukraine has its own production and also receives appropriate assistance from our partners, and we must make sure that our resource allows us to stop the enemy. that is, to reduce its

combat potential, everything is equal, the attacking force, the enemy, it can be stopped, we have it. er, separate directions where the enemy is also trying to advance, but he is not advancing there, it can be done and it must be done, it is necessary to stop the enemy, such a resource is necessary that will allow the armed forces to perform such tasks, well, in your opinion, in this is ukraine winning or losing resource wars as of now? we have some samples of armed military. techniques for which resource we should receive from our partners, and we must understand that if they are submitted in a timely manner, then the armed forces of ukraine have the opportunity to perform tasks, if they do not arrive in a timely manner,

a problem begins, then this resource, it is divided into several parts, it becomes less, it is used up. more carefully, but how to explain to the battalion or brigade that yesterday you had such an amount of ammunition, but today it is less, the enemy has not decreased, but you should be more frugal, and here there is a problem, therefore, without resources, without western aid, it is very it is difficult to carry out the task, and it is true, that is, from your words, i understand that now we have no advantages... in the war of resources over the russians, well, let's look at the missiles that russia is firing at us, who has more, us or russia? in russia, the total number of aircraft, who has more, in the russian federation,

the number of mobilization resources, who has more, i understand what you are leading to, i mean, now on a different technology'. we were given western models of military equipment, we were given artillery systems, these systems, they technologically benefit from those models that are in service with the armed forces of the russian federation sometimes have a technological advantage, it can overshadow a quantitative advantage, well, it always works that way, so in this war of the military. these are always the kind of people who need to be replenished, any military operation, it is calculated in this way, plus a reserve, the reserve must be mandatory, so if all the needs of the armed forces are met, then we will

win in this resource war. mr. serhiy, i have a couple of personal questions for you now, and... regarding yours brother, in particular, and from official data it is known that he lives in occupied simferopol and works in the regional division of the russian pension fund, you communicate, i have not communicated with him since the summer of 2021, since then i have not communicated, everyone chose their own path. do you know what his fate is now i absolutely do not know, is he not in trouble because of who his brother is? everyone chose his path, he chose it, and everyone moves on his own path, i move on the path of a military general in

the defense forces of ukraine, he has such a path that he is in the temporarily occupied territory of the autonomous republic of crimea, this is his way, i don't communicate, i'm not... interested, there is no information, of course, and mr. serhiy, it is very interesting to know, actually, what is your path, what are your plans for the future? while the war continues, my place is in the defense forces of ukraine, after the end of the war i dream of living in our flourishing, peaceful ukraine, and building and developing our glorious state, if not a secret, in which corner? in which corner well, i live in kyiv, kyiv is beautiful and magical place, i would like to stay here, but if there is time, i visited different parts of ukraine before the war, so it happened that i wasn't

that old then, i hadn't been to donetsk and luhansk, and i hadn't been yet either. well, in all oblasts, the rest of the god has already been, yes, well, in the territory of the donetsk-luhansk region, he was, but in donetsk, in luhansk, he was not, well, we hope. by the way, mr. serhiy, i thank you very much for taking the time to talk with us, i remind our viewers that we had a great opportunity to talk with the hero of ukraine, with lieutenant general serhiy ivanovich naev, i also thank the expocenter of ukraine complex for the wonderful space where we were able to communicate, stay with us. we believe in the armed forces of ukraine, we believe in the victory of ukraine. glory to ukraine. glory to the heroes. in

the frantic flow of various events, it is sometimes difficult to determine what is most important. the country magazine will help to understand the essence of phenomena and processes. j. quality analytics and independent experts with the country at the center of the main events. there are discounts on lactial of 20% in the pharmacies psylansky, bam, and oskad. a woman's book at war - a joint project of the espresso tv channel and the spirit and letter publishing house. the book is based on the reports of the presenter of the espresso tv channel khrystyna parubiy. 20 stories, 20 fates, 20 women who defended the country. the book is dedicated to women who chose the path of fighting the enemy in

the ranks of the military. women at war, search in bookstores of ukraine. with the support of the konstantin zhivago charitable foundation. there are discounts on nephrobam. 20% in psarynyk, bam and oskad pharmacies. the knee was caught in time. then take flamides gel. flamides gel contains three effective components acting together. ash. lift, when my back hurts, i take flemides gel. three problems are solved by one flemides gel, from pain, from swelling, from inflammation. flemides gegel - triple action against pain in the back and joints. there are 10% discounts on water and soda in psylsnyk, bam and oskad pharmacies. new week on espresso, weekly summary information. technical and analytical program: a clear understanding of the key events of the past week, analysis of the causes and consequences of these events from

experts, forecasts of the development of the situation for the current week, the opportunity to put your own questions and join the discussion, spend the final monday evening with us and confidently step into the new week. the new week project with khrystyna yatskiv and andrii smoly, every monday at 8:00 p.m. on espresso. hundreds of thousands of square meters of damaged property, apartments, houses that need to be rebuilt, about the situation with reconstruction in different regions of ukraine, about people's rights, opportunities and personal experience. this is what olga's house looked like last year, and this is what it looks like now. i am not spending money at the moment. however, how to unite the country in the process restoration in the project of the urban reconstruction and development program, every saturday at 6:30 p.m. two

hours in the company of favorite presenters, presenters who have become like family to many, as well as distinguished guests of the studio. events of the day in two hours. vasyl zima's big broadcast. a project for smart and caring people. espresso in the evening. glory to ukraine, dear tv viewers. the west studio program is on the espresso tv channel. we will analyze the most important events of this week. the world once again found itself on the threshold of the third world war, in particular, today we will to talk about the iranian-israeli conflict and the corresponding consequences, in particular for the security of ukraine. because the enemy of our enemy is our friend. in addition, we will also discuss the extremely difficult story with abramovich's mission and how it can affect the consciousness of representatives of certain western elites from... we will really talk about what is called president zelensky's victory plan and how they will react to it in

washington and what specific steps our american partners will take. in addition , today we will talk about extraordinary an important issue for polish-ukrainian relations. the issue of exhumation in volyn. today's guests of zahid studio are mark feigin and lukasz adamskyi. now , a figure of the russian opposition in exile, a former member of the state duma, a well-known figure will work on the air of the tv channel. video blogger mark fagin. glory to ukraine, mark, glad to see and hear. glory to the heroes, i am glad to welcome you, anton, i am glad to welcome all the viewers of the channel. well, mark, you know, our tireless watch. doomsday shows without a single minute the beginning of armageddon, or the apocalypse, or events on the middle east showed how serious everything is. at the same time, we understand that the united states has become extremely powerful in the situation of containing iran, right? well, they at least deployed their air defense systems on their carrier

group. yes, iran is thinking now. but here i wanted to talk not so much about iran or the united states, but about... the situation, how it can affect the ukrainian-russian war, so we understand that iran, on the one hand , is an ally of russia, it supplies it with ballistic missiles, on the other hand, we understand that the state israel has extremely tense relations with iran, but on the other hand, it communicates quite calmly with the russian federation or the same north korea, well, according to your estimates, as the situation or the threat of ... a big, full-scale, bloody apocalyptic war in the middle east can affect the situation with the russian-ukrainian war, in particular, when we are talking about the supply of everything necessary. still, i believe that the conflict in the middle east will not reach the transformation into a more global world war, not so much will affect, but this does not mean that the events there do not

affect the situation in ukraine, and i would say that from a military point of view they can affect. positively, this is a simple linear scheme, according to which, if israel retaliated in the coming days on the territory of iran, there could be military facilities or energy infrastructure facilities, oil facilities and so on, and among these facilities there may be those , which are engaged in the production of weapons supplied to the russian federation, which are ballistic missiles, drones, as well as accessories for them, which kill ukrainians, therefore, it is very beneficial for ukraine for this strike to take place. for israel to carry out this strike and destroy at least part of iran's military industrial infrastructure, well, it's obvious, politically, definitely a loss in this theater for russia, and russia is directly involved, and moscow is involved in events in the middle east, it's quite obvious, they are fighting its direct military allies are iran, hezbollah, and hamas, and

syria, where russian troops and the same iranian queer are stationed, is partly related to this. a loss in one of the geopolitical theaters will affect the situation in for ukraine, this means that moscow, even if it is directly involved in the war, may lose somewhere, and perhaps its interests, to put it mildly, may be harmed, since its allies will lose, sooner or later the main one of them, in the person of moscow, will lose. well, this is also a fairly direct logic. israel does maintain this contact with moscow. the logic here is simple: we have 100 idiots hostage. view, a false view of things, but it is my moscow that is restraining, as it seems, israel, in my opinion, and i do not impose it on anyone, that moscow is restraining both iran and other players in the near east of not crossing a line. in principle, as i understand it, we are only talking about iran and one way or another about hamas. hezbollah is, after all, a direct proxy

of tehran, so moscow, if it has any influence, is indecisive. still, iran is much more important. moreover, we will say that in the current state of hezbollah, taking into account the deaths of all its leadership members, it does not pose such a threat. this is the threat of activists, the weapons that are there, the accumulation of a large amount of money. by the way, they are from drug trafficking receives huge income, few people talk about it, but hezbollah is a huge organizer of drug trade and drug trafficking in this region. there is no force against israel, so the operation in south lebanon will be successful. i think that as a result of what will happen, relations between jerusalem and kyiv, both in military and other terms, will become closer. this is objective. and this will happen

if the role and influence of moscow in the region will decrease, not increase, but decrease, i mean in the near future. then israel has nothing to be afraid, he will then be able to more openly support ukraine, at the request of common allies, primarily washington, to still share military supplies, exchange of intelligence information and other means with ukraine, to help ukraine in the confrontation with this eastern despotism, moscow, may influence, now the obstacle is the netanyahu government, let's say. because the opposition forces are just talking about changes in relations with moscow, which they consider responsible for many events this year, starting on october 7, when hamas... and hamas under the direct control of moscow, not only, but including, attacked southern israel and killed more than a thousand people. of course, moscow did not prevent this attack. could or not? in

my opinion, it could, probably in the opinion of the israeli leadership, it could also, but maintaining this communication with moscow seems, in my opinion, illusory to israel, that it gives an opportunity to somehow influence the situation from the inside. from his enemies. i think it is not so, but it is a matter of diplomacy, a matter of great politics. perhaps after the results of this war and after the results of this one the aggravation will be clear. maybe we don't know something. and this is an extremely correct and useful formula in order to somehow try to outline the current disposition, we don't know much, it happened extremely. well, for example, does iran have nuclear weapons or not? here's who can say that for sure for 100%. i think burns knows that, biden knows that, netanyahu knows that and putin knows that, right? well,

here we already understand what the consequences can be. but simply returning to the politics of washington, we understand that an extremely important event took place the visit of the ukrainian delegation, in particular president zelenskyi, which was dedicated to two super important cases from the group. one case is permissions. to fire at russian military facilities beyond the urals, let's call it so delicately, there or under the mongolian border, where, in principle , swarms of our drones do not reach. the second point, this is undoubtedly a victory plan, but here we are entering the thin air of secrets and conspiracy, yes, because in the white house they said, watched, studied, familiarized themselves, there are interesting points, but everything remains, so to speak to speak confidentially, well, this is where conspirol multiplies. it remains to add more, you know, eternally cheerful professors who already put putin in the refrigerator for the tenth time. so, i would like to start with this extremely important

case, which is called strikes on the territory of russia, in particular on military facilities. putin's hysterical reaction immediately appeared. he changed the nuclear strategy of the russian federation on the fly, literally, live on the fly, in particular in terms of applications. both strategic means and tactical, and accordingly, even without having it changed under with his hands, all out loud, this means that putin began to throw tantrums in order to stop this decision. yes, and of course, he primarily wanted to influence the west, which makes a decision to grant ukraine the right to use long-range weapons transferred by the west, transferred by washington to ukraine, for strikes deep in russia. definitely to the west, because it definitely does not make an impression on ukraine. nuclear threats coming from moscow, of course, against the background of 2.5 years of war and hundreds of thousands of victims,

will probably not have such an effect. moreover, everyone understands that, let's say, putin definitely realizes that the use of nuclear weapons and the threat of their use are different things. he tries to achieve the maximum effect, the maximization of this effect primarily from rhetoric. from threats, not from the use itself, because the rhetoric is reversed, you can always play it back, as peskov did after putin's speech, there it has already come to the point that even drones can be considered as a reason why nuclear weapons can be used, then it started , and no, there is no need to exaggerate everything, misunderstood, and so on, that is , it says that verbal rhetoric itself is a weapon, but the use of nuclear weapons is irreversible, you cannot go... back, and how are you going to do it, and that is why those experts who believe that it is exclusively a tool of pressure on public opinion, on the west, on the establishment and elites of the west, and that it is not necessarily

a bridge to application. most likely, they are right. putin is not ready to use nuclear weapons, because the consequences of their use, i repeat, will be irreversible. the question is whether do these threats and this nuclear blackmail make an impression on the west? if they did not provide the opportunity to use it for strikes deep into russia, then it means that it has some effect, it certainly has some significance when washington and its allies make a decision. another issue is the internal political situation in the united states itself. after all, there is an election campaign going on there. democrats are fighting republicans, candidates trump and kamala harris are fighting, and the lead is very shaky, if there is one. for example, at harry's. it still has to be realized, therefore, by november 5, by the day of the elections, by the results of the elections in the usa, this factor will probably be decisive in the issue of granting ukraine the right to use for...

what trump will come and not only because the democrats will simply lose to trump, because the strategy will also change , we already understand this, the strategy that will be directed to support ukraine, if the democrats, despite all the criticism, despite all the claims against them, against their indecision and so on, first of all against the biden administration, against biden himself, we are still talking about what it is... hold, which is institutionalized, declared and implemented, well, as they can, it will change under trump, based on his public statements. and what else should this be based on, what should be the criteria for defining trump's program? this was the reason for the dispute, the discussion, sometimes they cancel the meeting with zelenskyi, then they hold it on the contrary, zelenskyi's statement is quite fair, because he said, listen, trump doesn't have a program, but

what is it really. at one time you and i spoke honestly about the fact that a full-scale invasion was being prepared, you know, there is no, we did not wrap it up everything is in the paper, they did not tell about what you think and the economy will win, that is, putin’s bodvij, he is quite eloquent, his body language, yes, and putin’s hysteria, it happens directly on the faces of those, his supporters, who sat in on this . meringue, and here they didn’t even fly by, they all sat like that, yes, yes, yes, you know, during these 2 years of the war, its course, its intermediate results, kyiv was not taken in three days, we must speak clearly , that the system itself has changed, after all it has changed, the war has changed, i.e. now she is more personified, she is totalitarian, this finally took shape in her despite the fact that some

signs indicate an authoritarian, rigid dictatorial regime, but still there are totalitarian elements. and to imagine now that in putin's entourage there could be at least some shred of doubt is impossible, unacceptable, it is on the one hand. and then, as we have already seen from the type of such systems, the more rigidly you strengthen the system, as stalin did, for example, then you try to copy any risks. related to threats caused by yours system, that is, you remove the most loyal, shoot and imprison the most loyal? why, and how will they return to the disloyal, they will start looking for ways to get rid of you, especially since external conditions contribute to this, putin has no way out, the elites have a way out, they can hide, then

pretend that nothing is wrong. .. to whom will putin shift the responsibility from himself, to whom? putin has no way out, the elites have, even a certain bortnikov has a way out, so he can not be hanged, shot, imprisoned for life, he will show the mossad id, you know, there is a third zimbabwean passport, by the way, such interesting logic, maybe they really have a mossad id,

putin needed to show it on tv. putin needed to involve his entire entourage in order to make a collective decision, so that one could always say: it was a collective decision, it was not my personal decision. now he no longer has this reflection, he does not need to try to portray something. everyone already understands that war is his area of ​​responsibility. of course, all those who stand behind him, he was already going to fight for three days, at that moment he tried to use the old approaches, collective, collegial decision-making, and now he cannot lose, the elite can lose the war in ukraine, and what will happen to it, and that they will take moscow, no, the loss of russia is simply not the fulfillment of putin's goals to seize ukraine, you understand, and what will be lost from this, the whole environment, it does not matter whether you are a member of the security council or an ordinary member of the collaboration.