ash gives fresh breath. lakalut aktiv++ - an action that you feel immediately. there are discounts on videgin. 10% at travel pharmacies for you and savings. damn, stepladders, my legs can't walk anymore. that there is no health? but what kind of health is there in the sixth decade. and i thought so until i tried herovital. gerovital+ is a phytovitamin complex that cares for the heart and strengthens the body. gerovital+ - good health, active life. glory to ukraine, dear tv viewers, on the espresso tv channel, studio zahid program, we will analyze the most important events of this week the world is once again on the brink of the third world war, especially today. we will

talk about the iranian-israeli conflict and the corresponding consequences, in particular for the security of ukraine, because the enemy of our enemy is our friend. in addition, we will also discuss the extremely difficult story with abramovich's mission, how it can affect the consciousness of representatives of certain western elites, of course, we will talk about what is called president zelensky's victory plan, and how washington will react to it and what concrete steps... are underway our american partners, in addition to this , today we will also talk about an extremely important issue for polish-ukrainian relations, the issue of exhumation in volyn. today's guests of zahid studio are mark feigin and lukasz adamskyi. now , the figure of the russian opposition in emigration, the former member of the state duma, the famous video blogger mark feigin will work on the air of the tv channel. glory to ukraine, mark, glad to see and hear. i am glad to welcome anton, i am glad to swear by the viewers of the channel. well,

mark, you know, our indefatigable doomsday clock shows less than a minute to the beginning armageddon, the apocalypse, and the events in the middle east have shown how serious everything is. at the same time, we understand that the united states has intervened extremely powerfully in the situation of deterring iran, yes, well, they have deployed at least their air defense systems on their aircraft carrier group, yes, iran is now thinking, but here i at least... talk not so much about iran or about the united states, but about the situation, how it can affect the ukrainian-russian war, we understand that on the one hand, iran is an ally russia, he supplies it with ballistic missiles, on the one hand, we understand that the state of israel has extremely tense relations with iran, but on the other hand, it communicates quite calmly with the russian federation or the same north korea, well, respectively.

how do you think the situation or threat of a major, full-scale, bloody, apocalyptic war in the middle east might affect the situation with the russian-ukrainian war, particularly when we're talking about supplies. still, i believe that the conflict in the middle east is not will reach the transformation into a more global world war, will not have such an impact, but this does not mean that the events there do not affect the situation in ukraine. so i would say that from a military point of view they can have a very positive effect, it's a simple linear diagram that if israel retaliated against iranian territory in the coming days, there could be military facilities or energy infrastructure facilities, oil and so on, and among these objects there may be those that are engaged in the production of weapons supplied to the russian federation, and this ballistic missiles, drones, components for them, which kill ukrainians. therefore,

it is very beneficial for ukraine for this strike to take place, for israel to lead to this strike and destroy at least part of the military industrial infrastructure of iran. well, that's obvious. politically, of course, the loss in this theater is for russia, and russia is directly involved, and moscow is involved in events in the middle east, that is quite obvious. its direct military allies are fighting, including iran, hezbollah, and hamas, and syria is partly related to this, where russian troops and the same iranian queer. undoubtedly, a loss in one of the geopolitical theaters will affect the situation in ukraine. this means that moscow, although directly involved in the war, may lose somewhere. and perhaps her interests, to put it mildly, may be harmed. since its allies lose, sooner or later the main one of them, represented by moscow, will lose. well, this is also a fairly direct logic. israel does maintain this contact with moscow. the logic here is simple: we have

100 hamas hostages, moscow is restraining, as it seems, israel, in my opinion, a wrong way of looking at things, but this is my opinion and i do not impose it on anyone. moscow deters iran and other players in the middle east from crossing a line. in principle, as i understand it, it is only about iran, and one way or another about hamas. after all, hezbollah is a direct proxy of tehran, so moscow, if it has any influence, is indecisive. still, iran is much more important. all the more so, let's say that in the current state of hezbollah, taking into account the deaths of all. its management members, now there is no such threat represents, this is the threat of activists, the weapons that are there, the accumulation of a large amount of money. by the way, they get a huge income from drug trafficking, few people talk about it, but hezbollah is a huge organizer of drug trade and

drug trafficking in this region, but it doesn't matter. in general, now hezbollah does not have the strength to oppose israel, so the operation in south lebanon will be successful. i think that as a result of what will happen, relations between jerusalem and kyiv, both in military and other terms, will become closer, this objectively, and this will happen if the role and influence of moscow in the region decreases, not increases, but decreases, i mean in the middle east. then israel has nothing to fear, it will then be able to more openly support ukraine, primarily at the request of common allies. to still share military supplies, exchange of intelligence information and other means with ukraine, to help ukraine in confrontation with this eastern despotism, moscow. it can affect. the obstacle now is

the netanyahu government. let's say it directly, because opposition forces are just talking about changes in relations with moscow, which they consider responsible for many events this year. since october 7, when hamas, and hamas under the direct control of moscow, not only, but including, attacked southern israel and killed more than a thousand people. of course, moscow did not prevent this attack. could or not, in my opinion, could, probably in the opinion of the israeli leadership also could, but the preservation of this communication with moscow seems to israel, in my opinion, illusory, that it gives the opportunity to somehow influence the situation from inside. from the side of his enemies, i think it is not so, but that is a matter of diplomacy, a matter of great politics. perhaps, after the results of this war and after the results of this escalation, it will be clear. maybe we

don't know something. and this is an extremely correct and useful formula for somehow trying to outline the present. disposition, we don't know much, there was an extremely important visit, well, for example, whether iran has nuclear weapons or not, that's who can say for sure, i think burns knows that, biden knows that, netanyahu knows that and netanyahu knows that putin yes, well, here we already understand what the consequences could be, but simply returning to the politics of washington, we understand that there was an extremely important visit of the ukrainian delegation, in particular president zelenskyi, which was dedicated to two super... significant cases, one case - these are permits to fire at russian military facilities beyond the urals, let's call it so delicately, there or under the mongolian border, where, in principle, swarms of our drones do not reach. the second point is undoubtedly

a winning plan, but here we are getting to the point years of secrets and conspiracies, yes, because the white house said, looked, studied, got acquainted, there are interesting points, but everything remains. so to speak, confidential, well , conspiracy theorists multiply here, it remains to add more, you know, eternally cheerful professors who have already put putin in the refrigerator for the tenth time. so, i would like to start with this super important case, which is called that strikes on the territory of russia, in particular on military facilities, putin's hysterical reaction immediately appeared, he is on the go, literally live on the air, on the fly i changed... well, the strategy of the russian federation, in particular, in terms of the use of both strategic and tactical means, and accordingly, even without having it changed at hand, all on purpose, this means that putin began to get hysterical in order to stop this decision. yes, and of course, he

primarily wanted to influence the west, which makes a decision on granting rights to ukraine, to use the long-range means transferred by the west. washington to ukraine for strikes deep into russia. certainly, to the west, because this impression is definitely not on ukraine makes nuclear threats emanating from moscow, of course, against the background of 2.5 years. war and hundreds of thousands of victims, it will probably not have such an effect. moreover, everyone understands that, let's say, putin definitely realizes that the use of nuclear weapons and the threat of their use are different things. he tries to achieve the maximum effect. the maximization of this effect comes primarily from rhetoric, from threats, and not from the application itself. because the rhetoric is backwards. you can always play back, as peskov did after the performance putin there it has already come to the point that even drones can be considered as a reason for

the use of nuclear weapons, then it started, but no, there is no need to exaggerate everything, it was not understood that way, and so on, that is, it says that verbal rhetoric itself is weapons, but the use of nuclear weapons is irreversible, you cannot play back, and how are you going to do it, and that is why those experts who believe that this is exclusively a tool of pressure on public opinion, on the west on... and the elites of the west, and that it is not necessarily overturned bridge to application, most likely they are right. putin is not ready to use nuclear weapons, because the consequences of their use, i repeat, will be irreversible. question: do these threats and this nuclear blackmail make an impression on the west? if they did not provide the opportunity to use it for strikes deep into russia, then it means that it has some effect, it definitely has some significance. at the time of decision-making by washington and its allies. another issue is

the internal political situation in the united states itself. still, it goes there election campaign. democrats fight republicans. candidates trump and kamala harris are fighting. and a very shaky advantage, if there is one. for example, in harris, it has yet to be implemented. therefore, by november 5, by election day, by the results of the us elections, this factor will probably be decisive. in the issue of giving ukraine the right to use western means for strikes deep into the territory of russia. why? because they do not want a built-in situation, they are afraid that trump will come, and not only because the democrats will simply lose to trump, because the strategy will also change, it is us now we already understand the strategy that will be directed at supporting ukraine. if the democrats, despite all the criticism, despite all the claims against them, against their indecision and so on, first of all against the biden administration.

well, as they can, it will change under trump, already now, based on his public statements. and what else should this be based on, what should be the criteria for defining trump's program? this was the reason for the dispute, the discussion, sometimes they cancel the meeting with zelenskyi, then on the contrary, they hold it, precisely because zelenskyi's statement is completely fair, because he said: listen, trump doesn’t have a program, but really, what is it, trump himself answers, everything has its own time, at one time you and i honestly talked about the fact that a full-scale invasion was being prepared, you know, there is no they didn’t wrap it all up in a piece of paper, they didn’t talk about what you think and the economy will win, i.e. putin ’s body language, it’s quite telling, his body language, yes, and putin’s hysteria, it happens directly on... , who sat in this council, and they didn't even fly by, they are all like that

we sat, yes, yes, yes, you know, during these 2 years of the war, its course, its intermediate results, kyiv was not taken in three days, it must be clearly said that the system itself has changed, after all, it has changed, the war changed her, that is, now she is more personified. this finally took shape in her, despite the fact that some signs testify to an authoritarian, rigid dictatorial regime, but there are still totalitarian elements. and to imagine now that putin's entourage could have even a hint of doubt is impossible, unacceptable, it is on the one hand. and then, we have already seen type of such systems, the more rigidly you strengthen the system, as stalin did, for example, then you try to...

what if they return to the disloyal, they will start looking for ways to get rid of you, especially since external conditions contribute to this, from putin there is no way out, there is a way out in elite. they can hide, then pretend that they are not guilty of anything. and to whom will putin shift responsibility from himself, to whom? putin has no way out, the elites do. even a certain bortnikov has a way out, so he may not be hanged, shot, or imprisoned for life, he will show his mossad id, you know, or his third zimbabwean passport. by the way, yes, the logic is interesting, maybe they really have a mossad id. here, putin does not have such an opportunity, even though he

had a fan of these passports and certificates, he has no chance, because for putin it is fundamental, unavoidable. i'm retired, i'm in the garden, i'm sorry, i didn't make the decision about the war, putin made it. that is why you mentioned the events of february 22nd, when they decided on the red security the recognition of the republics of the ldnr, and in fact we understood that the issue was being decided the beginning of the war, and putin needed to show it. on tv, putin needed to involve all his entourage in order to make a collective decision, so that it could always be said: it was a collective decision, it was not my personal decision, now he no longer has this reflection, he does not need to try to portray something, everyone and so everyone understands that the war is his area of ​​responsibility, and of course, all those who stand behind him, he was already going to fight for three

days, at that moment he tried to use the old approaches of his collective colleagues. no, russia's loss - this is simply not the fulfillment of putin's goals to seize ukraine, you understand, and what does he lose from this, the whole environment, it does not matter whether you are a member of the security council or an ordinary employee of some district administration, well, he does not lose anything, he stays where he was, works and is doing what he used to do, but putin is losing everything, you know? mark, the goals of the war and the goals of putin, i discussed with my american friends the situation with zelenskyi’s victory plan and so on, and they rated the idea as such, they say, in general not bad, a key story, where there will be elements of not just deterring the kremlin, but the kremlin's interest in entering the negotiation

process, we understand, so america must hurt putin so much that he was without... forced, but, as they say, not a fact, so we understand that putin did not manage to achieve the military goals, military-political goals that he set for himself, accordingly, the operational situation on the battlefield changed, we entered a long, bloody war, yes, and our prospects are quite, you know, vague, accordingly, in your opinion, the winning plan, putin's reaction, and the so-called, you know, very different signals, from... scholz, well, i don't want to list all those people who would like, so to speak, to start a certain negotiation process. you know, i will tell you this, putin would not have paid any attention to zelensky's victory plan and his discussion, discussions, if not for one thing, but the kursk region. so, if it concerned the front line in

ukraine, aid to ukraine and even an attack on the territory of russia, but still a baseless landing on the territory of the russian federation. two districts in the kursk region, almost 1,000 km away, where fighting is currently ongoing in an attempt to push the armed forces of ukraine beyond the state border, then probably putin would treat this leniently, as he treated the peace formula, the august events, and the beginning of the armed forces operation, he disdainfully , i would even say, with a kind of ultimate, arrogant tone, offered three conditions: which must be fulfilled in order for these negotiations to begin. and everyone understood that these conditions were not fulfilled. i will remind them, on the eve of the peace summit in lucerne, he said: free the four regions in the administrative borders, i.e. withdraw parts of the armed forces from there. cancel all sanctions, and first, from the start

of the negotiations, accept the commitment on the non-aligned status of ukraine, that is, in fact, on the end of sovereignty. of ukraine. let's call a spade a spade. ukraine outside nato and ukraine in nato are two different ukraines. and everyone understands this very well, no one is stupid. and this is where the kursk region happened. and actually, how can he continue to behave as brazenly, taking into account the fact that you do not know to the end how long the troops will remain there, which will be lost, or units of the armed forces will advance further, and suddenly they will enter the bryansk region, and what will happen is completely unthinkable. this is certainly an exciting, irritating factor that affects putin's decision-making. in a sense, he has become more cautious, much more cautious in public statements as well, unless

we are talking about nuclear blackmail. for example, judge for yourself, he says that it is not important to us what bandits, bandos, some provocateurs from the ssu do. what are the provocateurs, what are you talking about, is there a war? you occupied 20% of the territories of ukraine. yes, what did you want? it way, as he said: "because the talks about the fact that the war will spill over into russia itself have come true, they are like that, yes, now, if sooner or later there is a decision to strike deep into the territory of russia, then it is absolutely clear that these strikes can lead to the continuation of the operation, during which the armed forces of ukraine will ... occupy new territories in russia, move further to kursk or to kurchatov or to other

large cities in the territory of the kursk region slogan, and some a threat, because if we are talking only about ukraine, then win, don't win, you are liberating your territory, here you can suffer, and the population of the european part of russia can turn out to be the object of war, and not an episodic, pin strike of a drone. rockets that carry 200 to 500 kg of explosives are nothing, and a 50 kg drone, in comparison, there are different types of drones, but nevertheless, it is absolutely obvious that the damage will be many times greater, taking into account the presence of foreign troops on the territory of arref, or maybe putin is afraid of some indignation inside using this situation, surrounded by those who are not happy with him, to get rid of him. for example, troops reached kursk. of the armed forces of ukraine, that then, there are only 50-55 km from the same suzha, not such a great distance, but from kursk to moscow 500, i am not saying that this will happen, i am just talking about

the political influence of this factor, and therefore, the victory plan is already perceived differently, there is a different feeling that putin catches and understands that in reality not everything is so simple, just because you take ughledar and pokrovsk, you will not solve the problem of the kurdish region, it is not automatic solutions, they are not related, you can grab a few more. before the new year or after it, although there will probably be a winter break, but this does not mean that you will automatically solve the problem of the presence of foreign troops on the territory of the russian federation, their occupation of a large part of the territory, about 1000 km, that is the problem. but there are other moments, yes, if there are really some additional tools or additional, so to speak, moments that will interest putin, and he will be able to get into one or another, be it behind the scenes, be it through the americans, whether through one or another... like switzerland , a negotiation or pseudo-negotiation process, well, he can't just jump out of the war, explaining to the fascist population, which, i don't

know, for years before the full-scale invasion was fooled by all his propaganda, cannot tell them: well, you know, here we decided to reconsider our attack on ukraine, let 's somehow withdraw the troops from the new subjects of the federation, that is... we understand that this act is illegal, but that's how they ordered himself in order to completely cut off all the ways of retreat, i don’t know, there for patrushev or someone else who could have conversations with bjorns there or naryshkin, we understand that way, and that’s how this moment of exit is, from the other side we understand, well that putin is ready to play for a long time, that is, they have not agreed on anything, which means that everything will continue at approximately the same pace for a long time. putin, for the elite, for russia itself, for the population is not a dead end.

here, you know, there is such a thesis that putin will sell anything to the population as a victory, not all, still not all. here, i adhere to the opinion that you cannot sell absolutely everything, you cannot portray absolutely everything as a victory, if it is only a concession, a loss, a compromise and so on. that is, he cannot do everything. to sell due to his political position, he proclaimed something completely different, de facto they were going to take kyiv in three days, three days or a month, it doesn’t matter, now we are talking about the truism that ukraine is not capable of resisting at all and so on, this is not it happened, which proves that ukraine is a full-fledged state, which continues to resist, and even if you imagine that there will be no allies, then how will you manage this territory, which you can, you can only with repressions, mass murders with... your

relationship to the war, to the government, to the alliance with russia, there is no no tool, for putin it is definitely a dead end. yes, this is a mixed approach to kyiv, the landing of a puppet government, if there is any chance, and if there is no such thing, they did not even think that such a thing was possible, that is the point, they did not have a backup plan, a backup plan, in fact, eliminating everyone those who started this war with him, and patrushev, and shoigu and so on, this is precisely his... attitude, well, gerasimov will hold on, i think, until the new year, he will also be changed, because the symbol of defeat, failure in ukraine must be visualized . for putin, this is a dead end, he will continue for some time, until some important fateful event occurs, resist and insist that this peace be concluded on his terms. of course, putin is looking for peace talks. of course he wants this peace process and stop the war because

it gives him pa'. the sovereignty of ukraine, it means that the 80% controlled by the central government in ukraine go to nato, the western integrated community, the eu and everything else, all this is a defeat, he lost ukraine then, you understand, because of course, the occupation of new territories no one ever admits. that is , legally he does not solve this issue, and he has nothing to do with them. what do you think, mark, putin could be getting at, so we understand that there is a public part, there is a non-public part, but in the public part everyone can read, well not all, well but there is yavlinsky, for example, there, let's freeze, let's freeze, we understand that this is a cry to nowhere, well, but at least it is there, this story about stopping the war, a cease

-fire, people will stop dying, we... have heard this rhetoric, they will not stop dying, and the war in this sense will not stop, and will continue, it is necessary to create an atmosphere in which ukraine appears to be an opponent of the war, it is necessary to worsen the image of kyiv, that it resists this and thirsts for blood, it is only for this is done, for nothing else. actually, these people from they say that everyone is ready, but only ukraine is resisting. this is definitely a deception, a large-scale deception, a kremian scheme to follow. you can't, because i emphasize once again, it is directed against ukraine, because it is empty talk, a simple litmus test, a simple example of how this can be achieved, very simply. i'm sure, i suspect, there is inside information that putin has been offered many times to stop mutual shelling, that is, you stop shelling the territory of ukraine, and ukraine stops shelling the territory of russia, without using drones, missiles. moscow always refused, always. here you are.

fight on the front line and fight, let's define a zone, no more than 20-30 km along the front line, but no more strikes on the territory of ukraine, even in kherson, even in okhmadity, even in other places, why not agree on this, why not to stop destroying the whole country, putin no longer agrees, that is, what does this show, it shows that he does not want any peace, no ceasefire, he does not want an end to bloodshed, i think that such offers will be entered. who have to repent in european capitals and form a non-governmental position of peace, all this is also launched by the kremlin, and the mandate of those people will be, conditionally speaking, they just know, a wandering tent, or they will present someone’s specific signature there, of course, because abramovich is doing this , he is

assigned to do this. probably surkov has something to do with it, again, they are talking about it, it is similar, because abramovich deals with exchanges, abramovich interacts with the leadership in turkey. istanbul - grain corridor, so-called, yes it was, all his, all his, so now it will be pushed through. first, experienced western allies also understand this. to say that washington does not understand this is ridiculous. washington understands everything perfectly, it's just that he does something else, there is an understanding of the situation there. to say that they are naive or stupid there is no, they understand everything. another issue is, perhaps, it is beneficial for the negotiation process to take place and for putin not to fall completely.