tv Cavuto FOX Business February 13, 2013 11:00pm-12:00am EST
11:01 pm
11:02 pm
one you likely watch. but here's one you unfortunately missed. relax, because tonight, rimmed policy her. rand paul is here. welcome, everybody. i am neil cavuto. rand paul has crunched the numbers about what the president has said and says it is about to explode the deficit and there is no way you can talk about spending on things like infrastructure, kind of change initiatives come in green initiatives, all kids initiatives, and so many other initiatives. without initiating a lot bigger deficits. rand paul is here to say that not only does the math not add up, nothing of that. senator, it is great to have you. >> thank you for having me, neil. neil: oro you do now?
11:03 pm
what do you do? what you advocate republicans do? >> i think we have to point out the truth. we cannot let the president went on the country saying that he has cut the deficit by $2 trillion. well, that is absurd. we have increased our debt by $6 trillion in his first term. what did he say? bowl, because i didn't increase it, i have reduced it to trillion dollars? that is absurd. he adde $6 trillion to the debt and th is just a fact. he must have listed 50 different new programs and they are not going to cost you anything. neil: the deficit immediately raised concerns as to how it will be paid for. when he mentioned about closing
11:04 pm
tax loopholes and raising billions of dollars, doing now, and then mitt romney saying about something that he wanted to do, do you think he was setting the stage for more tax hikes to pay for what could be hundreds of billio of dollars of new spending? >> i can tell you that there is absolutely no room for raising taxes. the thing is if we were going to have true tax reform,hich means lowering rates ad getting rid of loopholes, there is a lot of support for that. but nothing he is talking about is lowering rates. he wants to increase rates for if he wants to squeeze more money out of those that are working hard. heust did that. he stuck it to the rich people at the end of the year..3 he got what he wated. but he is not going to get any more tax revenue. it will injure the economy. we think it will cause more unemployment. so we will not go along with
11:05 pm
that. neil: you know what worries me is in general, we have given up the fight. we are done. what we think will ultimately be for $4 trillion in budget savings over the next 10 years, it's not a done deal yet. you know, that's it. that's the end of it. that worries me because it is a debt that is larger than it is in 10 years. there's a lot of wiggle room in that. what is going on? deployed this is the biggest signature issue ofof our time. >> he says things out of both sides of his mouth. he says he is ready to embrace things from bowles-simpson. but they talked about raising the age of eligibility for social security and medicare. and then another part he says, absolutely coming somewhere to do anything for the retirement age. i really don't know what he's talking about or if he really is
11:06 pm
intending to address the problems at all. entitlements are growing so rapidly, they ll consume all the money in the budget within a decade. there will be no money for defense. no money for any discretionary programs. neil: you are right. it's a train that before i happens. but i guess what i want to ask you, sequestration cuts, they kick him march 1. and obviously the way to avoid them is to come up with other cuts or republicans to swallow revenue hikes. giv that, i would assume that rand paul would go ahead and let the sequestration cuts come. >> yes, i think they have to. americans need to know that the sequestration, the $1 trillion is a cut in the rate of increase in spending. >> that is very crucial. i am glad you made a crucial
11:07 pm
point. >> spending over the next decade will go up between seven and a $8 trillion, even with the sequeste no one is cutting the real amount of spending. that is why the deficit will continue to rise over the next decade. even with the sequester. i think the sequester is a beginning. you have to do it. and you have to do much more than that if you're going to preserve us from a debt crisis down the road. neil: you know, we always see our debt threaten to be downgraded by bringing it to the brain. time and again, you're up against a deadline. there is all this hammering and yaering over everything. that is not the underlying problem. you agree that? he gets downgraded, they don't see us acting and addressing our deficit problem. but the other thing people need to realize is if we don't fix these problems, what happens is we pay for the debt, you lose purchasing power. the president claims that he
11:08 pm
cares about the poor and middle class and senior citizens. but really he doesn't. he is stealing their money, devaluing their currency, it's a sleight-of-hand. the poor people are struggling, people on social security do not get cost-of-living increases. they struge to make ther tax balance each month and buy food because we have this massive deficit and they lose purchasing power. neil: your view is you suspect that republicans would opt for letting that cut chicken? >> i think so. i think there is more resolve than letting the sequester happen now than there was three months ago. >> okay, thank you, senator. good to see you. okay, coming up. police arresting darryl hannah
11:09 pm
today. she is very much in trouble and care to explain. and apple getting blasted for having too much cash. if only washington had that kind if only washington had that kind of problem. today is gonna be an important day for us. you ready? we wanna be our brother's keeper. what's number two we wanna do? bring it up to 90 decatherms. how bout ya, joe? let's go ahead and bring it online. attention on site, attention on site. now starting unit nine. some of the world's cleanest gas turbines are now powering some of america's biggest cities. siemens. answers.
11:10 pm
you are gonna need a wingman. and with my cash back, you are money. forget him. my airline miles will take your game worldwide. what i'm really looking for is -- i got two words for you -- re-wards. ♪ there's got to be better cards than this. [ male announcer ] there's a better way with creditcards.com. compare hundreds of cards from all the major banks to find the one that's right for you. it's simple. search, compare, and apply at creditcards.com. first round's on me. it's delicious. so now we've turned her toffee into a business. my goal was to take an idea and make it happen. i'm janet long and i formed my toffee company through legalzoom. never really thought i would make money doing what i love. [ robert ] we created legalzoom to help people start their business and launch their dreams. go to legalzoom.com today and make your business dream a reality. at legalzoom.com we put the law on your side.
11:11 pm
>> it is time for an increase in minimum wage. because if you work full time, you should n be in poverty. neil: we could have talked to an economist about that whole minimum wage thing that came out of the blue and the president's address last night that he was shipping today. but we thought, why not go to the very people that would ha to pay that wage. we welcome our three gusts. >> thank you, neil. neil: 9-dollar minimum wage.
11:12 pm
are you up for that? >> no, i am not. i can't believe that the president, considering what we are going through, it is going to increase my payroll cost 28%. you can't raise your cost for that. it is ridiculous the one-two punch is he raises minimum wage and we have the affordable healthcare act coming up, which will cripple us. it's another nail in the coffin. neil: backing out of the blue, it's such a negative. >> it's incredible. he to be tto what to do. a 24% increase, it's not right. i have kids that are in school, these kind of jobs, they ar not worth more than $75 an hour. i raise them, what am i going to pay everyone else? neil: i was thinking that it
11:13 pm
would be the same thing if you had more seasonal workers that had been around for a while. 24% boost, the other guys are going to be demanding a boost, right? >> that's exactly right. we hire very few people in minimum wage. but we do hire people above the minimum wage scale. so the people you were paying $9.50, they will now 11150. the money isn't there. $11.50. it's just not there. we are all doing so well, according to the jobs council a few weeks back. neil: part of the strategy, the democrats in general, cobbling everyone together and you have a base that will always be fighting for whatever. they're the ones who are fighting you. you are on the receiving end of
11:14 pm
that attack. how does that make you feel? >> well, it makes me mad because at the end of the day, when we just raise the minimum wage to $18 per hour. these people are going to have a job. they're going to get laid off. and if you raise the minimum wage however you want, if can't afford to pay it, but as a matter? cobbling those people together, but if i don't have a job, what does it matter to them? neil: i don't think it's a stretch. do you still want to keep your business going? whoop-de-do? >> we are either going to have to raise prices, which is very tough, the's not a lot of disposable income out there. cut back on hours and staff. take away things that are not necessities. some of my locations are not exactly the most lucrative ones.
11:15 pm
neil: in the end, fewer workers? >> yes, fewer workers. >> the same thing here. we will hire people that are packing cookies, doing that kind of income and they're not going do that anymore. that is not a 9-dollar per hour job. less people will be on the paoll. it goes back to the same thing. if i have to increase prces, i cut my total sales amount. people don't have the money. when i raise prices, i lose customers. neil: the president is saying we have always heard about minimum wage going up from the work force arrives, things get better, life goes on. you know, they all said, calm
11:16 pm
down. what do you say? >> i say that maybe we weren't in the same kind of circumstance that we are now. we are in the middle of huge turmoil. real estate is taking a hit. what are they going to do, knock us down even more? we cannot absorb this hit. t this time. itis not going to happen. maybe before when times we better, but not now. neil: small businesses that pay that. they are the ones talking about it. you guys are the ones disproportionally backed by health care and regulations and etc. you feel like custer ever? >> there is no concrete plan. there is no concrete plan about
11:17 pm
it. neil: wait for the win on wind on your back. it's coming. >> it's ridiculous. >> we don't see this. >> people like us, we are struggling and we need help. neil: okay, david,is there a way out of this? what would you tell them to most ease your burden. what would be? >> what you have to do is go back and look at history. we have always got through this before, i will say that. in 1960, there were 1100 bakeries in the city of st. louis. today there are nine. you want to tell me how good we are dong? there used to be a meat market
11:18 pm
on every third corner. there used to be a florist on every fourth or fifth corner. do you want to find me a local florist? this is a bunch of bull when they say that we have made it. they businesses have gone more successful. small businesses are going down the tubes. how many mom-and-pop businesses are there left anymore. when you get out of big cities like new york, there are no little grocery stores. there are no little convenience stores on neighborhood corners anymore. small businesses are dying a rapid debt. when you consider how many tens of thousands of businesses have gone under in the last 25 years. mr. president, answer that question for me. >> i would just say, mr. president, commie. because before you make another one of these boneheaded decisions, talk to me. i am going to tell you what the consequences of that decision. we will go up and we will talk to the president. neil: the president is never ever going to call you.
11:19 pm
[laughter] you will never get back on. [laughter] >> but why doesn't he talk to small business owners before he goes and pulls this out of his ear and says it's a great idea. it is dumb as can be. if he would have asked some of us, we would've told him. neil: they are not some big, you know, corporation. oblivious to the effects of the common man and woman. they are real. meanwhile, the president is pushing a jobs plan that could not cost
11:21 pm
( man ) legs up ! ( man ) legs up ? legs up, legs up, legs up ! red hot deal days are back. let nothing stop you. good job ! it's red hot deal days. get the nokia lumia 822 in red for free and discover all the things to do on the go with city lens. or the droid razr m by motorola in pink for $49.99. everything droid does in an edge-to-edge display. hurry in, because the sale ends february 20th. powerful devices. powerful network. verizon.
11:23 pm
ne: high-tech steve case is here. talent that investors want to see more of. jerry moran introducing jobs bill that they believe wouldo just that. steve, to you first. would this be more effective in generating jobs? >> i think it would be effective. it is one of the recommendations that the jobs council ade. now we need t focus on other issues around entrepreneurship. most important one is talent. thats the key to driving an
11:24 pm
entrepreneurial economy forward in high skilled immigration has to be a part of any immigration reform. the legislation that was introduced, along with others, it really helps deal with that front and center. our issues around reforming our policyith high skilled workers. neil: one more question on that front. do you think here wouldn't have even been a need for a jobs council from the get-go than? >> i don't think it is helpful, including things like we are no longer focused on. >> it wasas only supposed to be for two years. i think a continuing effort,
11:25 pm
making sure that the recommendations that we may have been put into practice. it can only happen with bipartisan support. >> senator, we are trying to reform the immigration system in our country and deal with the millions here. are we putting foreigners to the front of the line? will they get these great jobs that americans won't? >> it's absolely a challenge. i certainly think that the review of our immigration policy is important. we have an immigration system that is dysfunctional. people who try to come here legally get trapped in a system that never gives him an answer. the legislation that i and my colleagues have introduced, start up 3.0 deals with a segment of that. one is a stmac issue that has received a lot of attention.
11:26 pm
they have an idea to have a dream, they want americans to work. and they are told that they can't do that here in the united states because they can't get the status to stay here. neil: i understand. but how would you address things. we certainly don't want these guys coming here, what you say? >> the visas included our visas that will help me demand work for employees in the united states. we need to spend more time and effort and energy and resources on making certain that americans pursue degrees, advanced degrees in mathematics and science and engineering and rearch careers. but the fact are that we have
11:27 pm
hundreds of thousands over the next few years of job openings. in the absence of being able to feel those with american students who have graduated and are looking for work, if they can't be filled by someone else who has studied in the united states, those who have that skill set and intellect, those companies are going to go outside the united states. the global demand for talent. here is what i say about the legislation. we are talking about it as it relates to the entire immigration debate. in my view, 80 of my colleagues would agree with me. republicans and decrats think that this is common sense. it is about creating jobs and economic opportunities within the united states. if we do not do it, the jobs will be created elsewhere. we cannot wait. 80% of my colleagues agree with me. but yet, there are those that say if we can't do everythg, we are not going to do everything. neil: i would like to get a quick lay of the business plan.
11:28 pm
the president pushing to raise the minimum wage. nothing for small busine, but they feel slighted. more than that, they feel pretty angry. they doubt that they will see much action or much improvement until that focus changes. is there anger justified? >> each case may be different, but i think there is focus on small business. there is an essential driver of our economy. the kauffman foundation data, basically saying that 40 million jobs, we can't just focus on small business and big business, but the entrepreneial businesses, a source of jobs and
11:29 pm
innovatioinnovatio n. economic growth, the only way to solve the fiscal problem in the long run is not just to focus on cutting spending or figuring out ways of revenue, but how do you drive the growth rate. there has to be that of entrepreneurs, this is a step in the right direction. >> thank you both very much. neil: at the white house today, actors darrell hannah was arrested for protesting the keystone pipeline. she is just out of jail. and she stopped by here coming and she stopped by here coming up next. at a dry cleaner, and she stopped by here coming up next. we replaced people with a machine. what? custers didn't like it. so why do banks do it? hello? hello?!
11:30 pm
if your bank doesn't let you talk to a real person 24/7, you need an ally. hello? ally bank. your money needs an ally. i took my son fishing every year. we had a great spot, not easy to find, but worth it. but with copd making it hard to breathe, i thought those days might be over. so my doctor prescribed symbicort. it helps significantly improve my lung function starting within five minutes. symbicort doesn't replace a rescue inhaler for sudden symptoms. with symbicort, today i'm breathing betr. and that means...fish on! ymbicort is for copd including chronic bronchiti and emphysema. it should not be taken more than twice a day. symbicort may increase your risk of lung infections, osteoporosis, and some eye problems. tell your doctor if you have a heart condition or high blood pressure before taking it. with copd, i thought i'd miss our family tradition. now symbicort significantly iroves my lung nction, starting within 5 minutes.
11:31 pm
11:32 pm
neil: actress daryl hannah arrested today. >> thank you for having me. neil: you know, you were protesting at the white house. as far as i know, the president said nothing about keystone st night. he is so against it. so why protest oside the white house? are you worried he is going to buckle? >> well, we have never heard him say that he is a guest against
11:33 pm
it. it is our to being put in through texas and oklahoma. we are asking him and pushing him to reject the entire keystone pipeline. because it is an export pipeline neil: this comes at a time, another similarly supportive situation, unions. they want the keystone pipeline back online. so the president has to choose between friends. what do you make of unions effectively saying, you environmentalists, pipe down. >> it is interesting. because this pipeline has brought together a lot of
11:34 pm
factions, skin service -- conservatives and when you look into it, the promise of jobs the trans canada support. when you look at the big picture, he realized the threat of the climate crisis is still urgent. we have an obligation to ac and demand that the keystone not be put through. if we allow itnot only is it only for them to be able to have their product to export, but it was dirtiest form of extreme extraction of fuel on the planet. >> had to explain that to a lot of americans within 30 sunday's? you know, what is really getting me upset, these higher prices.
11:35 pm
there is daryl hannah. >> yes, this has nothing to do with our gas price it has nothing to do at with that. this is and even gas for us. this is expert the global market. neildo you worry about fossil fuel reliance for folks abroad? in the end, in the interim -- it's all or nothing for you? >> no, let' be clear, it is for export. they want to get it into the global market. we are already processing that fuel and oklahoma and other places. they cannot get it to export through their own country. they can't get it -- [talking over each other] [talking over each other] >> the canadians don't want it. [talking over each other] [talking over each other] neil: indulge me, if it were, --
11:36 pm
>> it is a moot point. the extreme extraction mining project is a legal product. [talking over each other] [talking over each other] neil: the pipeline will run both ways. we will be able to take advantage of it ourselves on the road. you seem to be denying the opportunity for americans to do that. >> americans are already using this fuel. we are already processing it and other refineries. [talking over each other] [talking over each other] neil: [talking over each other] [talking over each other] neil: if it got to the point where der henle could say, okay,
11:37 pm
[talking over each other] neil: this is about clean energy? >> this is about a foreign company using ourountry, the purity and cleanliness of our water and soil to get their product to market so the global market can sell to china and india and not to give to us. neil: i think yoo are using that as a smokereen. >> i'm not. i'm not. neil: you're saying that ts is going to the various sites around the world. it sounds like you'd still be against it. >> that is ridiculous. there is no way they would even promise that. neil: but you don't like fossil fuels at all. >> definitely time to that we move away from fossil fuels. nevertheless, -- neil: you're ot against all the options here?
11:38 pm
nuclear, wind, solar, you are not against a full doddle strategy or use the more? >> i am against using things that are destructive to our health and our clean water been tainted, our soil in our lives been tainted. our ecosystem as well. neil: it is good to see you. >> it is good to see you too, thanks. neil: coming up next, we will talk a lot about this
11:39 pm
there is no mass produced human. so we created the extraordinarily comfortable sleep number experience. a collection of innovations designed around a bed with dualair technology that allows you to adjust to the support your body needs - each of your bodies. our sleep professionals will help you find your sleep number setting. exclusively at a sleep number store. sleep number. comfort ... individualized. at the ultimate sleep number event, queen mattresses start at just $599 . and save 50% on our innovative limited edition bed.
11:41 pm
not a single dime? a lot of people are questioning not. the president is telling the truth, says my xt guest. he's one of four democrats who brought an undocumented immigrant to last nights night's speech. cumbersome, i want to get into immigration with you in a second, but i added up some of the stuff that the president proposed, and i stopped at about $330 billion. >> here's what i d. i figured iwould do homework on the immigration portion of this program. as you know, grover norquist is ford immigration reform. we heard senator marco rubio yesterday. and others.
11:42 pm
they are pretty fiscal conservatives. i think we would all agree on that. $18 billion per year, it is spent on immigration enforcement every year. that is more than the dea all the rest of the federal government combined on enforcement issues. we will save billions dollars once we legalize that. a lot of people kind of think about this as, well, it costs money. you know what costs money that we cannot be innovative. we do not have the high skilled talent that is necessary. technology, innovation, we can do it right here. we don't have to spend a broad. neil: you are obviously factoring in the savings you will get. [talking over each other] [talking over each other] >> it would not to stop. you know, we currently can take
11:43 pm
our resources and better pinpoint hose resources to those that are murderers, rapists, causing harm. what we are doing is having 11 million people, you are targeting them. -- there is not going to be any immigration reform package that will fill out an income tax reform at the end of the year. neil: for all the other things that the president wants todo, expanding high school commitments arod the country, initiatives in green technology, all of those things, youre going to have to find a way pay for it. i would take it at face value.
11:44 pm
>> the other thing is there will be fees and penalties. [talking over each other] [talking over each other] neil: all of this and how we get to this -- >> and-itis please share and be physically honest with you? i need to evaluate just how it is. neil: do yo think you know i like to think he made that up? >> i voted for him, i like them, and he's a great guy. but i don't have an answer. what a difference. when i went and did my homework, please invite me back. neil: you are honest enough to say that. >> it all sounded good to me. things we should do.
11:45 pm
11:49 pm
$1.3 trillion, total automatic spending cuts that kick in unless congress wakes up and does something soon. sequestration cuts are actually delayed from late last december, presumably to allow them to prevaiand come up with something better. well, those automatic cuts are now very much affecting everything from discretionary and domestic spending. john grasso says the cuts will be the lesser of two evils. the other ing higher taxes to ofet them. senator, given the choice, what do you do? >> i believe that this requester is going to go into place on march 1. it was originally the prident's idea about a year and a half ago. congress passed it during the debate, he said it would never happen. yet he has not proposed a solution. unless you actually pass another law, it cuts it on march 1.
11:50 pm
when the ratings agencies downgre us committee hadn't yet seen a credible plan to provide the confidence that we are really going to deal with our financial problems and this requester is just one step. neil: you think that the ratings agencies counts when they see charade like this, where you are up against brinksmanship and the deadline and everyone is going to lose their heads and go crazy, and we keep doing this sort of stuff? >> i would like to have a long-term look at social security and medicare, for the next generation. right now we are both on a path to vagrancy with them. i would love to see the kind of arrangement and deal that you had when ronald reagan and tip o'neill worked together in a
11:51 pm
bipartisan way. the president really has not worked in a bipartisan way to get to that. neil: he talked about the $4 trillion, sequestration cuts added in there, that is it. the $4 trillion in budget savings, don't look for them to do much more than that. is that right? >> i think you are, it's interesting, the state of the union, it was a laundry list of things if you would like to do, all of which would cost a lot of money. >> the american peoplere not going to be fool a second time. he said the second thing, about the health care law. >> i think what he was saying,
11:52 pm
it will add a dime the deficit because i'm going to raise taxes on folks reported. >> it's interesting. entering your first question, the president talked about young people graduating from college with huge educational debt. but every child born in america is born with an incredible debt based on the fact that we have over a 16 trillion-dollar debt in thi country. it is a mountain of debt. it is interesting when the president focuses on an individual student college debt. at the graduate can't find a job in an area for which he or she is prepared, but ignores completely the debt on every american. >> senator, it's always good seeing you, ank you. neil: oday, apple investors are getting a lashing out. you know what apple's big problem is? way too much cash. way too much cash. they have way too much
11:54 pm
11:55 pm
il: the first lady last night posting investors. apple ceo tim cook, lately he has been getting cooked. more investors are outraged over something they find unforgivable. all of that cash, $137 billion worth of it. one is even soon, saying the money should be given out to shareholders. our guests are discussing this on whether having too much money is a problem. >> tim cook said it himself. a year ago last february, he said yes, i don't know what to do with this money. he promised he was going to do something about it. he was going to sit with the board, but it never happened. so now he had 95 billion in the bank. two thirds of which, by the way, is sitting in foreign banks.
11:56 pm
neil: it wasn't as big a deal last year. right now, it'a big deal, is that right? >> well, this is the fundamental problem of what is driving wall street right now. one hundred years ago and people invested, they made fundamentally sound improvements. >> they are holding onto this cash because they don't know what kind of storm might be coming. this might not be enough cash on hand, considering where our tax dollars are going in this country. >> this is david saying, hey, guess what, that's the risk that he takes on. >> it comes from steve who was
11:57 pm
paranoid about not having enough money. in 1995, he had to go to microsoft and get $150 million in alone. can you blame him? >> he has a rainy day fund. [talking over each other] [talking over each other] >> not $135 billion. >> a dividend that they haven't given how long wld be out of the question. >> i don't know how much of that i would be getting, i'm not saying that he has to pay out. >> he has proven that. [talking over each other] [talking over each other] neil: it was sort of like,
11:58 pm
taking oil out of the strategic reserve, you have seen the stocks sink of late are getting antsy and even mad. but now is not the time. >> apple has been making an acquisition every other month for the last 10 yars. this company is notitting around idly. ultimately, apple will do the same thing. rainy day fund response. you guys tell me, it is a half trillion dollars, where is the level when you start to go, okay, ese rainy day funds are
11:59 pm
crazy. >> cash is power. and they have power right now. if you are going to lose half of its value, it is in a position to buy back stock. >> you are demanding so much more from this company. >> you are forgetting a very important thing. who owns apple? the shareholders do. >> hold on. [talking over each other] [talking over each other] >> is shareholders knew that
98 Views
IN COLLECTIONS
FOX Business Television Archive Television Archive News Search ServiceUploaded by TV Archive on