biggest, one of the biggest companies in the world. let's be his partner. >> neil:nd never invest in anything charles says. that will do it here. cost of freedom continues now. ♪ fighting back after being singled out by the i.r.s. >> what is intolerable is one set of rule forne side of the political fight and anotheret of rules for the other. >> since may of 2011, i have been dormant not only out of the inability to raise money but aect fe govnment had a target on my back. >> iant to protect and preserve the america i grew up n. the america that people cross oceans and risk their lives to ecome a part of. i'm terrified it's slippi away. leader of conservative groups testifying how thei.r.s.. the agency is supposed to foow the money. and the rule of law. but did the victims just prove the tax man was playing politics? hi, everybody.

good to be withyou. i'm liz macdonald in for david asman. welcome to "forbes on fox." go in focus with -- steve, what do you think? >> obviously, it's politics. ey went after the orgizations to make sure they didn't participate in the 2012 elections. theyent far beyond just doing routine audit. they did not target liberal groups. this is going t end up in washington, elizabet and it will have a special prosecutor and beas big as watergate. it was bad stuff. not a handful of enemies but anyone put their head above the parapit. >> so there is politics in play? >> there may be but i take exception saying it will end up in whington i'm old fashioned about this. i actually think there needs to be evidence before you can evict somebody. so far there is no evidence that even puts at a lower level of washington. let alone the people that you might want to see get tagged with this. sabrina, today on --

yyesterday, friday. there is a report out that actually there is evidence that i.r.s. was dictating what was going on in cincinnati. reuters is reporting that. the two cincinnati workers saying that yes, the i.r.s. was telling them in d.c. what to do. at do you think? >> i think that we will see more evidence coming out. this is not about the rule of law. this is about the obama administration trying to control the flow of informion. i am sensing a pattern here between the i.r.s. scanl, the media tracking scandal, the n.s. now, you k spying onthe average americans. this is, this is an administration that wants to control the flow of infomation. it's suddenly coming to head here with the i.r.s. scandal. i couldn't agree with steve more about this. >> you know, morgan, here is the deal. conservative groups,f course they have to be questions like everybody else. but they were in question like everybody else. they were basically asked about their book they were reading. meetings, donors. ten democrats had pressure the

i.r.s. to do re. senators levin said basically why is the i.r.s. being so passive? al franken and schumer threatened e i.r.s. with legislation if theyidn't act. go ahead. >> yeah, this is a political issue. how can it not be a political issue. for no other reason than you talk about the tax except status for the organizations that identify themselves politically. whether this is a one-sided witch hunt, how farack to washington thisgoe a lot of th remains to be seen. ill's rather unformnate. the bigger issue for me is 501c is an area of murky super secretive area for campaign funding which is what they are not supposed to be. the primary purpose is not supposed to be. all of that is clouded over. party democratic liberal conservative. all of that is crowded over by the scandal. >> but you didn't see -- you didn't see words like progressive or moveon.org, the key words. you didn't see the key words

the i.r.s. was using to target groups. no liberal witnesses were presented. progressive group presented the house ways and means h hearing. >> this is political. >> the government unaccountable and not liked by outside oups are going to investige those group so i tnk the i.r.s. action are scandalo but the true scandal here to me is that the i.r.s. exists to begin with. >> that is interesting what you said. i want to turn back to the witnesses. who testified. let's take it again. >> maybe they were coming down ha on you because so many of you were plying for status at the same time. that is their argument. what do you say in response?

>> there were progressive groups. they weren't looked at, as closely as we were. >> the complainers could have savedded themselves grief if th took "tea party "out of the occupation and put innocuous name and called themselves coalition for healthcare oreach or called themselves americans for big government. they could have done whatever ey want to do. the big scand is c-3 to get tax deduction for giving them money. the scandal is overtly partisan groups set up se-awsemi-autonomous to get tax deductible donaons -- >> but the problem is -- here is the thing. sierra club does this. >> but it's bh sides of the political aisle. we have have to go to 2010. the context, the president was basically claiming that

foreign operatives were pouring in the n-profit sector and getting themselves involved in the u.s. election system. what do you make of that? >> i thin the "wall street journal" pointed o this wasn'ter is ra tissue "se"raicious. this was political and one-sided. ink blott goes wider and wider and wider like waterga watergat >> what do you make of carl levin saying to the i.r.s., you're being paive. senator franken and othe say we'll pass legislation if you don't respond the way you want. >> what i make is if that what they did -- >> there is evidence. they have letters.

take it up with them. but this is not clear it went to th top. there isn't evidence tocanide it that. stop with the propaganda -- >> but wait. hold on. nott opaganda. >> it is. >> the president reved the leader of the i.s. commission head. we have a d.o.j. criminal probe. if it's not anssue why doing that. >> how can you say he is involved? >> it's a high level you have to have the d.o.j. to act. go ahead, sabrina. >> if it weren't for t tea party, the republicans wouldn't have had the landslide victory they did in the 2010 mid-term. there are operatives in the white house looking to 2014 to think we need to muzzle conservatives now. if it's the case that the citizens unitedncreased the volume of c-3s, i am ahead of one. i hope the conversation doesn't tar all c-3s. but if we have increase in c-3

and c 4, we need transparent system to pull sun seth of applications. we have n't target specific groups. >> leight there. healthcareaw promise to bring down cost. the very people mea to health proving costs on the way up? >> reduces most people's premiums. bring down the deficit by $1 trillion. because we spend the healthcare dollars wisely. east.

back to "forbes" on business.

♪ >> the healthcare law was all about lowering cost and getting the uninsured insured. but a new survey says whopping two-third of those who don't have a healthplan yetmay not buy one at all. steve, you say this is going to cost us all. explain. >> well, if they don't get everyone in to this thing obviously they will have more costs. what they designed in a way younger people with the subsidiaries pay more than they shld in a normal free market. so younger people at least initially will say they catch me i'll pay the small fine, not pay $5,000 to $7,000. if you go on the exchanges to do the apples to apples comparison, california and oregon, kaiser peante plan you find out you will pay more in exchange than on the free market. the government puts in stuff most peopleon't think. >> rick, what doou think? >> i don'tknow where to begin. it's not true wha steve said. he california exchange range come in better than expected

and people under 25 with me income is25,000 qualifying a large percentage of them for subsidies will pay less th they have t pay now. >> overall, what e they 30% more? >> no. here is the other part of this, though. this poll that came out that you refer to saying 65% don't know if they are going to si up, you know what? i wish i had a nickel for every call i get, i'm turning 65 in a week. how does medicare work? people haven't focused on this yet because exchange don't open until october. talk about this when that comesnd people think about it. >> it takes along time to get covered. >> costs are going up because this is not insurance. surance is historically cheap you buy something for the unthinkable. politicians with obamacare want to us have insurance, to pay for every malady. they want it to be that we can show up and get insuranc when

we are already sick. this is not insurance so it's expensive. >> didn't kathleen sebelius say premiums are going up? so did the cbo. what do you make of it? >> it's safe toay that the premiums wi gop for some people. how much and what it will look like and to people it will go up, i think a lot remains t be seen. going back to rick's point a the exchanges don't open up for enrollment in october, a lot -- i think there is a lot more miles per hours to focus on. they are focusing on before they start to look at this. we have the jobs numbers out. we still have 20% of young adults without jobs. they are looking to get the jobs befo they sart to think a about the enrolling on the exchanges. i think it's still premature. we have have the debt ceiling debate coming up before this takes place. >> rig. premature to figure out -- >> iear what you are saying. >> here is the thing. the poll results show less than ha of the people

responding. less that half thinkhey will get better healthcare. and about half think it will get more difficult to get tests. what do you make of t results there? >> i think that costs are going to come i less than expected. anybody with any sense expect the cost to triple. they are going to double. [ laughter ] >> we have system that you take something that used to cost money and now it will b "free. "itas to go up. sabrina go ahead. >> the big problem is the government mandate people buy something they don't need. th my mum essential coverage is so high that we are telling people they have to buy a five bedroom house when they need a one-bedroom apartment. >> what do you mean that they may not need? >> if you are a young man who just graduated clege you don't need all the bells and whistles. you don't need all sort of corage. they don't need to cover me to have a baby. he pbably has college loans and other debt he may need to

pay off but instead he is subsidizing me. >> how could you possibly know if youre going to get a cancer diagnosis next week? number one. >> that katz catti catastrophic coverage. >> that is the point. >> everybody thinks what john just said. it is absolutely untrue you can g sick then get insurance. there is an open enrollment period. it will start in october. it will finish on marm 31 next year -- march 31 next year. if you don't buy insurance you can't buy it until the next enrollment period. >> it stinks. >otherwise everybody would wait. >> john has it right, this is not insurance at all. it's prepaying next year's expense. for younger person that is true. you want kitti catastrophic coverage. you should choose what you want. >> weave the leave it there. next up, privacy concerns erupting over reports that the government is snooping. just about everything. phone call e-mail, credit cards, you name it. should you fear it?

the "cashin' in" crew on it at the bottom of the hour. up next, after three months of protests t t.s.a. keeps fixinghe plan to allow small knives back on plans. that's not good enough for some at "forbes" who say we need dp six the t.s.a. are they right or wrong?

♪ ♪ t.s.a. not okay.

the transportation security admistration backtracking on its plan to let small knives, baseball bats and other banned items back on airplanes. an idea that many airline employees and travelers said was very dangerous. sabrina, you say thiss why airport security should be privatized. explain. >> yeah, this is one more example. i don't thk anyone on the panel here today thinks that, you know, asking mom to take the little booties off the baby are making me carrying my manicure scissors keeping us safer. it's prably make us less safe to make it systemized and sort of regularized that terrorists or people wanting to hurt the system knows extly what we're doing. we should try out new screening technique. >> are airports privatizedded and it is working nicely? >> yeah. the problem is the logic fails here.

if you privatize every airport you decide if you want knives on a plane. you can't say you can take them on in detroitut not in os angeles. i don't know let me why they won't let me take a golf club. i'm more dangerous if i was on an airplane. >> but it's scary for the flightttendants and passengers to thin a lunatic could have a knife or any weapon on board. s,he cockpit doors are strengthped but what about t rest of the people on the plane? especially when you have a delay an tempe are rising up. you don't want anything in people's hands. or a drink. >> or golf club. >> right. >> the bottom line, privatized airports are mentally more efficient than those that aren't. san francisco versus l.a. san francisco is 50 to 70% more productive though they pay the same wages and go for the same training.

operate under the same agency. this is privatizethe t.s.a. set standards as the f.a.a. does but let companies figure out howo dot more efficiently an come up with innovation. >> this peoples like fly the unfriendly skies. >> the amica doesn't protect passengers it goes out of business. if the t.s.a. doesn't protect it, it gets more taxpayer money to expand bureaucracy. the profit motive is path to innovation. >> let the airlines compete. >> you tepe t.a. there to oversee and set rulations and you bring private sector workers in to operate at the airport. were seeing more and more airpororts apply to have it at

their location. johnmicah, the gnddaddy of t.s.a. is proposing this as well. >> i aee. ultimately we want thekeep americans safe. so unless we have a marketplace to try different things out we are setting ourselves up for a disaster. >> john, tammy, do you think we are setting ourselves up for a disaster? >> always. because you are asking the least qualified people to protect us. that usually ends in a disaster scenario. bring it back toarket. >> least qualifieded. what do you think? >> it would be the same people. they would work for private firm. >> be careful with the compariso they run far fewer flights than we do in the united states. they can do things differently. >> a lot of people in washngton, d.c. say that el a does it great. >> they do. >> we should pattern our airlines. >but we have it in our country. like san francisco and los angeles. so again, set the standards on training and things like that. let other companies figure out how to do it efficiently.

>> the time word. >> the t.s.a. carts in a lot of employees which is a reason it's much zo much more expensive. >>nteresting. coming up, looking for a great gift for the high school grad? we have the stuff ready to help them. you are ging to profit. that's next. i love to eat. i love hanging out with my friends. i have a great fit with my dentures. i love kiwis. i've always had at issue with the seeds getting under my denture.

super poligrip free -- it creates a seal of the dentures in my mouth. even well-fitting dentures let in food particles. super poligrip is zinc free. with just a few dabs, it's clinically proven to seal out more food particles so y're more comfortable and confident while you eat. super poligrip free made the kiwi an enjoyable experience. [ charlie ] try zincree super poligrip.

welcome bac with the stock for high school graduates. that is what we've got for you. morgan? >> valero is an oil company. cheaper than the competitors and pays 2% dividend. this is a value stock. you can buy it and sock it away. you don't have to worry about it. >> phil, do you like it? >> skilled refiner. but the successes dependot on the skills but on aan tom number called the crack spread. that sounds disreputable. it's the difference between price o crude and gasoline. >> you are a genius. bill, go ahea >> my thinking is why don't you put your kids in to totala, french oil company. the reason it's cheap that the coege they are going to divtinghe oil country. >> morgan, you like it? >> two reason i'm nervous about it. the first, very exposed to europe, which we know is shaky with the economy there.

nd second reason is the ceo is embroiled in a scandal. >> l right. that is it for "forbes on fox." thank you for watching. ep it here, number onebusiness h eric bolling and "cashin' in." ♪ >> they finally got it. i'm so proud. they are ready for anaheim. [ applause ] >> yep, livingit up amid the crackdown. i.r.s. employeeses dancing the night away. and showing silly ar trek videos at a victim junct, all the while tax officials target conservative group. we know how much it cost all taxpayers. you won'te dancing with joy. the government is dialing up more controversy. this time unclal sam getting info from major internet companies. microsoft, yahoo, goggle, faboo apple. oh, and they are seizing your phone records, too. is your personal information at risk? "cashin'