♪ neil: well, it's enough to make you gag. they've had it with gag orrers. welcom everybody. i'm neil cavuto, and it a little after the fact, but google is feeling a lot guilty and says it wants to release all the data requested has gone from the government only one problem. google says e gernment won't let it. it is asking some supersecret court to let it. go ahead and let google devils the secrets. i guess they're really not that secret anymore. i don't know whether the foreign intelligence surveillanc court, we actually have uch a thig, will let google do tha but this point it's doesn't matter. the damage is done. they release all the mel's.

we, they know allll that. so go ahead and unbden her troubled souls and try and get these surveillance demands out just as you already hadeported all these other demands out, the ones that you got from fedal and state and local officials to talk to say nothing of governments worldwide. they're troubling enough and numerous enough. will it really make much difference to know the house when wind of the surveillance stuff now? had added. willoogle asserting itself as the least cooperative company now and do all the harm it willingly or unwillingly agreed to? i ee doubt it. i am all for cleansing one sou but think it requires you first have gasol to cleanse. those two surf the web already know that they risk getting caught up in the government's web. they do not like it because when uncle sam wants the stuff they figure the company's that they used to proct the sff release it. no wondea lot of these

customers alreadyeel stuffed. they figure that no matter what google and yahoo and all these other guyso know, when push comes to shove they do little to protect their customers of all. formerly dip -- former deputy defense secretary and whether all this soul-searching really makes a difference or whether we just sort of have to bear it. >> well, this is really going to points. first off, the damage is done, if there is any. the basic point her is there is a lot of their permission out there that people have had to disclose to the government,ut the fact of the matter is, those thin need tbe disclosed. the fact is the telephone records, some of the mills that are being penetrated, that sff does not really bother me. the second point. neil: i love you dearly because you're so damned sma, but 115 plusillion records out there for whatever reason does not bother you? >> at some level you have to say, may be the fisa court should be saying you need to

pare this town, and they are not good at that. ducing the kind ofnformation they're looking for, but the thing to me in the second point is the real hypocrisy here of google. these are people who map where you live. neil: been go. and that is why this race that i year on the partf these companies after the ct, whether you -- and i guess you and i can respectfully disagree as to whether it is overkill, it over fein guilt. what do you think? >> you are right. don't mistake me. i am not saying you're wrong on the breath of some of these requests. neil: please do. you are smart, but i read a prompter. that think i have some experse >> at think you have a lot more expertise han just reading a prompter. the fisa court has not done a great job in trying to get the government appeared down requests. however, google is t company that you would want most to

penetrate. if you were the government and saying, these are the guys to track where people go, gps a metallophone, the guys to read your e-mail and scannedt for whatevereasons hat the senate for keywords the senate as the map or you live. wouldn't you want to know all at information if you would the government? would. neil: a guyike he knows this stuff pretty well. does it make a difference if a company cos out and tells you how many times they had the request from the government to do this? >> i don tnk it does. they're trying to cover their butts. you have a situation where tre are told by their lawyers are panicking and some board members

>> say we need you to renew this. and you know, they have been ordered to do this 50 times over the past ten years. i don't know what they're getting at. it is as see why a maneuver. there is nothing more to ithan that. neil: i won't argue on that because you have all my records. the former deputy undersecretary of defense. all right. google wants to tell a secret, how many times the government asked it to give away secret information. forget whether it has a lot of secrets. doesn't even have a case? aclu lawyer says ggle has a

case against the fisa court and should know. his group is suing over a of this. good to have you. what do you make of this and whether google can press the point? >> we all have a right to free speech in this country. when the government wants to take ay that right and the gag people like google or anyone else in the country, and has testified that. in a unique position to shed light on theebate is a good for sp they want to publish information about how my users have bee swept up in some of the surveillanceeorders.

the toe area members ofhe stickers that they get i information that they need, but also could be trying t publish information about the types of orders that they're getting and whether the orders are getting the dragnet type like the one that we saw directed at verizon. neil: that is what worries me. that is what worries me. i know a lot of people say, those orders, it's a big deal, trying to get some bad gs and all that. i think it is a bit of up argument myself, but leaving that aside to my worry about whether they're not even orders. when the government comes knocng in any entity through a fisa order or a judge with a piece of paper, more often than not my fear is -- a i hope i am wrong. mo oft tha not i think these companies say whenever you want, just don't leave a mess. what i that is proven to be the ca? shld we be alarmed about how easy it is for the government to get information, sometimes without even having to go through legal hoops to do it?

%-case we absolutely should be almed. it is one thing to have a commercial relationship where you agree toive up a little bit of your privacy in exchange for some great human services. it is quite another for companies to then turn over that information to he government, and we sincerely hope that they are complying with the law when they do so when not doing so when it all have to. before we can have the debate about that, we need to know which is why what you will is doing in a pitive for stepped off is the first up only. neil: you are not here judge what might be motiving this time whether it is a lead corporate culture that they realize that they're hiding some fire righ now. what do you make of this idea that wheneve they release and however they release it, it is compromising by definition,ut that we sign on to it as subscribers. we go ahead and use yahoo or google or pple or any of these

others in that tiny print, stuff that says, your life is an open book. >> well, i think that is a bit of a red herring being pushed by the government. it is one thing when we as americans choose toive up the information to our close confidantes or when we choose to mail people using services like google, but we don't expect when we send e mills like that for themo end up in a government data base without the government having t go to a court first. neil: i agree. i think w did a show not too long ago. the carnival cruise line. on the floor. itas ridiculous. they showed me, some lawyers showed me the documents that you sign when you go on a carnival cruise. in the argument was that the carnival cruise line was protected against. this could happen. it did not spell out in that morninthat you may end up with feces on your floor, but it was so broad and the proviso so

general that it covered everything, even that. what is that? >> well, setimes the government has a right to get that information, and sometimes that right stems from agreements that we met with companies on beaches to give the misinformation ne: i had government guys you're saying that that is what has happened. this always we're showing no, but the rage is misplaced because we all surrender some privacy when we make a phone call and this is something we should recognize and wake up to. >> well, if the government going to access this very sensitive information and in some instanceshe government is justifiein doing so, but if it isoing to it must do so in accordance with the rule of law where a country governed by the constitution and the rule of law and the values that make us distinctively american command

of we are to allow companies or anyone in this country to turn -ver this very private informatio about us without complying with the law then we have really lost the commitment to our ideals and our values as americans, wch is wy it is important that we know. is importa tha we know what google is turning over, the types of orderthatt is getting so that we can have this debate about what the p proper line is when it comes to privacy. neil: we shall wch closely thank you. good seeing you again. well, now we ow that surveillance stuff, these guys on the floor, all these guys nning around. they would be dead, all of them dead. it can't be that serious. we just had to know. we went out and asked people a simp question:

how old is the oldest person you've known? we gave people a sticker and had them show us. learned a lot of us have known someone who's lived well in their 90s. anthat's a great thing. but even though we're living longer, one thing that hasn't changed much is the official retirement age. ♪ the question is how do you make sure you have the money you need to enjoy all of these years.

♪ neil: all right, your records or their lives, what is it going to be? security expert tells this week had they not done allhat inspecting, see these guy on tradingloor of new york stock exchange they would not be trading, they would could be

dead, blown up by terrorists, to former nyse boss dick grao on whether he buys that. what do you make of it? >> i think that the authorities are spot on. new york stock exchange is the symbol of america's economic excellence. and thoseho to bridge the cotry down -- bring the country down look upon the stockstockexchange as a proxy ie assault and extinishment of our way of life. neil: i know, that but i'm saying, they are saying if they dendidn't have this surveillance program they could have seen a terrorist attack on the exchange. and a lot of people would be dead, do you believe that? >> i do, neil, twice before the 1993, first world trade center bombing, stock exchange was

subjected to acts of terrorn 1979, the fln blew up a small explosive on a sunday evening in front of our broad street entrance, in 1989, an acte group got on to the trading floor, penetrating our security. that was before the 93 bombing, the stock exchange represents a plump. new york city represents a plum to those who hate our way of life, i side with federal authorities i give them great credit, not only the feds but seconstock exchae itself has a terrific head of security who came. >> secret service brian gimblet he works hand in glove with authorities to keep people safe. neil: here is why we might sagree. you cannot tell me his surveillance program in and of

itself compiling records of 115 million americans, somehow ledo stopping an attack on the nexnext -- stock exchange. >> you your skepticism is healthy and well founded which is why the government has a sponsibility to became transparent. neil: but they are not. >> they have to step up, they are losing confidence of the american people. someone like you, i know would always opt for save the over anything else, in particular when lives are at stake, sayin i don't trust theovernment, government has a responsibility

to ce clean. neil: well, but it doesn't, what worries me under the guise of keeping us safe, you could sell a lot of stuff, a lot of nonsense and fear of losing our lives will give up a lot of freem in our lives, what is the balance to dick grasso. >> balance and litmus test, we have to have,ure are we compromg the tenent that made our country great and superior. neil: i think we are. >> wait, i know you were there. i was there. 11 years ago, okay 3,000 people died that day. in september. because we were not you know doing the thingshat needed to be done. followed bin laden in latter part of the 90s we had a shot at him, we did not take it w

know had we taken that shot, 9/11 would have never occurred. so, you know, i error on side of human life. >> you are nt hring me, i am saying, to sayhat to save ose lives we have to up survey lip program, more of type of verizon things now, to make sure it does not happy, even though the same program was in place at the time of the boston attacks and did diddly to stop them, i am saying be carefulor what you wish for under the guise it is keeping you alive, you are surrendering everything you have. >> no disagreement in the sse that the government and it has not to this point the government has got to explain to the american people, what the methodology is. what the protections are, so that we don't compromise the conscheduleddaconstitutional rif americans in turn say this is what we must do, if we save one

life it is worth doing. neil: all right, de dick grasso thank you. >> good seeing you. neil: ery weird, bonuses at irs, they are weird, and real, irs, they are weird, and real, and [ male announcer ] the mercedes-benz summer event is here. now get the unmistakable thrill and the incredible rush of the mercedes-benz you've always wanted. ♪

[ tires screech ] t you better get herfast [ girl ] hey, daddy's here. he you go, honey. thank you. [ male announcer ] because a good thing like this won't lasforever. mmm. [ male announcer see your authorized dealer an incredible offeon the exhilarating c250 sport sedan. but hurry. offers end soon. incredible offeon the exhilarating c250 sport sedan. at od, whatever business you're in, that's the business we're in. with premium service like one of the best on-time delivery records and a low claims ratio, we do whatever it takes to mak your business our business. od. helping the world keep promises. bjorn eas unlimited rewas for his smalbusiness take theseags to room 12 please. [ garth ] bjors small busiss earns double miles

on every purchase every day. produce delivery. [ bjorn ] just put it on my spark card. [ garth why settle for less? ahh, oh! [ garth ] great businesses deserve limited reward here's your wake up call. [ male announc ] get the spark business card from capital one and earn unlimed rewards. choose double miles or 2% cash back on every purchase every day. what's in your wallet? [ crows ] now where's the snooze button?

neil: awkward, thousands of tea partiers protest to capitol hill, the place they are protesting is cutting bonus ecks, $70 million in bonuses so far, tea partier mark meckler said that is bad timing, bad

everyone, the guy they call @%andfather of tea party movement. he is my age. ho is that? what do youake of this? >> well, it is outrageous, but perfectl consistent with government behavior,here is a root cause. you he public employee unions, government unions that negotiate coract wh government, they should not exist, that is where the buses are coming from out of the union contrt. neil: irs gave us a statement on that, essentially be on bring oblige to do this. under a leg agreement. this means, we got to do it. and it is part of the machinery. you say, got to chae that machinery? >> i say we have toestroy the machinery. there should are be so such thg as a governmt employee union, fdr him was against it and afl-cio said there is no place for government employee

unions, they are part of the cun can sir thacancer that is eatins country to death frm the inside. neil: it gets weird. the timing of this, and what is going on, and what was mood of tea partiers who feel no doubt put upon. >> people are furious, not jus -- this is a consistent b behavr of federal government, every ancy across the oard, irs in the spotlight right now, they simply do not care when the american people think, they don't think about what the american people think. we're out here trying to figure out how to pay our mortgages, and put groceries on table that's putut $7 millio70 million

bonuses tohese who are rassing the americans neil: was there a rage that white house was expressg a month ago. presiden said, i want to get to bottom of this, we have fbi director saying he cou not remember the name of investigator going after this or indication that a single conservative andtea party group has been called about this, what do you think of that? >> well, again, this is just a long-standing pattern, this is intentional, his is not a place take, already been proven -- a mistake, already proven not a rogue age out of cincinnati, it goes back to washington d.c., you will find this sinner nce interagency, they are reacting in survival mode, to attack groups that oppose this massive expansion of federal government. neil: but they are not investigating it. but that rage, that we have to get to bottom of it, groups have

not been contacted,e thinks they are not interested in finds out what really happened. >> because they know what happened. they planned what happened. they like what happened. so more they can do this, the better they are at expanding government. neil: what is the strategy, to tea partiers fr that da administration or those in power, now we know it is not from rogue agents to someone reviewing document in washington are they just fearing that they will play the long ball on this, the dam admistration and tire ad hope they lose interest. >> i don't thi they fear it regardless of congress holdi hearings putting on what i subject a show trial, congress created the rs, funds the i, and provided over site for irs during peopl time period this

happened. i do not expect congress to do anything, tea partiers do not expect congress to do anything. @%ve we do it ourselves, we have to sue the federal government, and that is what is going to cause actual change. neil: mark meckler we'll watch. >> thank you, neil 92 who needs to spy on their conversation we could have a conversation, we're talking to da taliban, for whici think means we're negotiating with terrorists. copd makes it hard to breathe... but with advair, i'm breathing better. so now i c help make this a great block party. ♪ [ male announce ] advair is clinically proven to help significantly improve lung function. unlike most copd medications, advair contains both an anti-inflammatory and a long-acting bronchodilator

working together to help improve your lung function all day. advair won't replace fast-acting inhalers for sudden symptoms and should not bused more than twica day. people with copd taking advair may have a higher chance of pneonia. dvair may incrse your risk of osteoporosis some eye prlems. tell your doctor if you have a heart condition or high blood pressure before taking advair. ask your dtor if including advair could help improve your lung function. [ male announcer ] advair diskus fluticasone propionate and salmeterol inhalation powder. geyour first prescription free and save on refills at advaircopd.com.

it's a brand new start.ption free with centurylink visionary cloud infrastructure, andcustom communications solutions, your business is more reliable, secure, and agile. a friend under water is something completely different. met a turtle friend today. avo: whatever you'r looking for, expedia has more ways to help you find yours.

neil: loo at the bright side at least we don't need their stinking phone records now we're going on the record with very terrorists with whom we've been spying, white house said they are open to peace talks with the taliban, and taliban is open to peace talks with the white house. terrorism expert said, thinks having talks like that is crazy talk. but it looks like it is real right now. what do you make of this? >> i don't kw where it goes, but i think you are right, it is asunding, but also dangerous. taliban, one of the most evil forces in world today were responsible for a qaeda for

killings of 3,000 americans, we went in, and lost thousands of american lives to destroy the taliban, now suddenly, we're recognizing them as almost diplomatic equivlent, we're giving them legitimacy, and extending the protect of that legitimacso that c go around the world, and say see the u.s. recognizes us, they are still continuing to kill americans, afghanisim, a women at same time we're entering talks with them? the notio -- you can talk with your enemy. bottom line, this isot just an enemy, this is a force that has never lived up to any type of promise that it made. why would we damage in talks with -- engage in talks with a group that has killed thousands of americans and will continue to do so, and destr afghanistan, now we're in afghanisn trying to you know, basically, destroyed them.

yet, we're recognizing them, a giving them legitimacto d destry their own country. neil: here is a lot of sense. here is county. we felt same way in the day of plo, remember andrew young, had secret meetings, i guess with yasser arafat when jimmy carter was president, it led to good-bye andy, now ongoing dialogue, rocky relations but still with plo and palestinian authority. so, argument goes, extreme ene of the moment, is the soartz of sort of negotiating partner in the future. you draw the line with taliban. >> i would also draw the line with plo, they never lived up to thr promises. neil: you know where this goes? >> lten we know what happened when we negotiated with the iranians years ago, they used to buy time too build up that

nuclear program by telling us they were really suspendg their enrichment program, they are not, taliban is 100 times worse than iranians they shot that 16-yearld girl in last 6 months, they killed 5 americans in last two weeks, there is no goodwill here. they are using us, we're allowining them to use us and enabling them to become legitimate, and become an equal force the can afghan security force, what is the ultimate goal? they will takeover the afghanistan country, and resume to a pre-9/1status quo. that means all that we've done for last there were years, all american lives that are lost will be for vein. neil: but look at all money we

save on spying on them. >> right 92 tha 92. neil: that is sad. >> sad and dangerous , what disney it say to other islammers terrorist movements? they saying, just wait, they will recognize you, i fire for thfear forthe future, we've bees moment. neil: it is easy to get on the side of united states if you just say, i thinka as they said, just say you think israel can exist. when they say that, then dollars were flowing, amazing, they have our number you know. >> theyave our number. and you know what, what -- einstein said, definition of insanity, repeating something that you sudden insane over and over -- that is insane over and

and over, that is what we're doing, it will cost mor american les. >> thank you very much. >> thank you very much. neil: dide aetna at od, whatever business youe in, that's the business we're in

with premium service like one of the best on-time delivery records and a low claims ratio, we do whatever it takes to make your business our business. od. helping the world keep promises. thisan is about to be the millionth customer. wod you mind if i gohead of you? instead we had someone go ahead of him and win fiy thousand dollars. congratulations you are our one millionth stomer. nobodyikes to ss out. that's why ally treats all theicustomers the same. whetr you're the first or the millionth. if your bank doesn't think you're special amore, ally bank. you need an ally. your money needs an ally.

neil: ana dodging a hdache, fedex dodging a bullet, a walmart not dodging squat. okay, literally, first off, a good insurance company that wants to stay that way, aetna bailing out of offerg individual plans in california. but a srt, inould affect certainly all californians. gary b, aetna says it is because of healthcar law, and how california wants to administer the law, you don't appear to be shocked?

no, if i was a share holder in it'erin aetna, i would applay saying in california, they have to same people with preexisting condiions, that means somebodyo the line, probably their existing heahy people will see higher premiums, and they will lo those people who other is insurance cpanies that they are wise to get out, unfortunately californians will suffer because there will be ess competition. neil: dave? >> ieresting. i'm a pretty strong free market guy, this is a little element that i beliive is pro consumer, insurance companies have a complex subject matter. so, that ide of exchange, that says, you have to sell a standardized package or four so everyone can see price

comparison, that is not a bad idea. i don't feel badly about california doi, that what is bad, california has done it in a way that says we're not letting you s sell niche products, you uld bes serve pet shop owners, we don't care, you have to sell it to everyone and at this pri only or you are out of here, i think they had about 4% o market, said, well we're out of here. not good for the consumers. >> and oth businesses, that -- all right, issue two, fedex no more, out with better than excted. so-so revenues, but analyst called it a turn around in a sign maybe the global economy is turning ? >> i do not aee. i think when revenues drop, there are all sts of ways that customers as we've seen, that can impact the bottomine, by one, just being mere efficient. -- more efficientbut what a revenue dropsith a fedex or

ups that is a sign of the economy not only flat lining but continui to slide down, that is why i think that we're going to be in trouble. yo know come next few months. ne: dave, topine thing begins top out, watc watch out. >> a gd news-bad news thing with them, revenueas up a little bit but not to exctations, and on thatront, i wld say, yeah that is not a good signal about the economy. not a big beats. neil: but. down a broad. -- abroad. >> it was down. neil: speaking of a quagme not getting any less qaagi e . >> you are right. >> here is the thing. using technology to drive costs out. the math they continue to do that that is a good sign because everything needs to do that. neil: l right, if at first you don't succeed find a better way to get them tpend, walmart

all but admitting be on visa, temping to dislodge amazon.com. so walmart is giving i a e-tailing go, promising to revamp the site. dave, too little to late? >> har to say, i'm a big walmart fan. i like the company, i like the way they do things, it is hard when you are not guilt for a given purpose on repurpose your company, you can drive nails with a croquet mallet. neil: i have done tt. >> that is not the best way it drive nails when amazon is built for e-tailing, it is hard to cash up with them, unls you leapfrog them, so far, guys built for big box retailing have not figured that out. neil: gary b, it is a huge concern. people use on-line site, what do you think.

>> i think dave is right, i'll expand that, i think almost impossible for walmart to do it walmart, stipulate thathey are greatest bris and mortar retailer. amazon is the greatest eretailer. flip it around, you could see amazon competing against walmart in a bricks and mortar in absolutely not. they sound like they are the same, they are retail, they are vastly different, and retail comes down with those margins, tiniest slip up, on the way, and you are screwed. we've seen that with retailer back to woolworths, w i don't thinkhat walmart will succeed at it. neil: thank you very much. good sees you. >> thank you, neil. neil: all right, you thought this mayor would begun soo enough, so pty now, well don't take out your styrofoam cups just yet. because, gulp! bloomy is

because, gulp! bloomy is spawning, you hurt my feings, todd. i did? when visa signature asked everybody what upgraded experices really mattered... you suggested luxury car service instd of "strength training with patrick willis." come on todd! flap them chicken wings. [ grunts ] well, i travel a lot and umm... [ male announcer ] at visa signature, ery upgradedxperience comes from listening tour cardholders. visa signature. your idea of what a card shou b

neil: you know seems that everyone wants to be like mike. at least a lot of mayors have taken a liking to mike. in outgoing new york mayor michael bloomberg. a bunch of big city mayors are getting in on the act by proposing strict limits to using food stamps to buy soda, down the road aot of other stuff they don't like. is that their call? to a guy from ben begins -- bennna begans sayss bu butt out. your issue is not the foodtamp

part but telling folks what they can do. >> i think that mike and dr. pepper got in a tussle at one point, and dr pepper beet the beat the hell out of him i don't know. the government overreach, and mandating what they can, and cannot ead o eat or drink is wr. that is a country o of choice. that is what we should have. neil: i concur with you, ts is the argument they make, you take care of yoursel not everyone is responsible. if they can't do it and won't do medical cost, goverent has tor do it, that is the argument. >> well, when you say no o

restrict something, thewill find a way to g it. neil: you say about big gulp soda, they get 5 smaller sodas. >> mandate here in new york, you know -- >> iay use it. >> there is a way around it let's go to genesis of it, when is education, do more education on nutriti, the most peoplen our biness are doing that now, many restaurants where we're posting nutritional information we trying to educate, yet still let our guests retainheir choice. neil: you have to do those calorie counts your menu. >> absolutely. neil: have you a lot of delicious things, i can figure out that if i'm going to get the double stuffed baked potato, i am not eating a salad. but, where do we draw the line between helping people and baby sitting? >> well, i think it is not only

part of ecation, and moderation. neil: but food stamp recipient are not getting that maybe government says,f you use these food stamps to get bad stuff, it will make your condition worse, and you will get more dependant on this stuff thats not hping you or us that is not helping anyone what do you say? >> well, it is the aproach to restrict or pla mandate what thy can or canno buy is not right way to go about it maybe breaking it more toducational selects, where we help foods on food -- folks on food stamps get more new frigga triggal -- nutritional purchases. you can go into any restaurant be as good or bad as you want to be, some i takes common sense.

neil: this goes, i think always -- whether michael bloomberg, well intentioned billionaire whatever. wean't do it so they will do it. and food is just part of the equation. you know. >> well, it is. but, again, i think you -- when you take araconian approach, and taking away piece that would help in terms of education, and some teaching some moderation this wonderful word called discipline, that would help the situation me tn saying, when you were a kid, your parents said no,ou find a way to get it, whatever it was. because that is the pressous prize. i just think that best way to solve this come to bennigans, and have a money christo and a

beer and figure it out. neil: not much discussio on part of administration aut all. so at least people wondering, who is running the shop? >> that is a great question. who is running the shop? just see -- youustee more and moreaxitty, and back to discipline in terms of information, the flip flopping, changes, and schizophrenic informion. what is the truth? there is a basic trust we want to have as citizens. neil: it goes back to personal liberties, they are being taken away, whether it ishat we eat or being spied on. >> absolutely. neil: paul thank you very much. >> come out to our bennins.

neil: thank you, this is something that government has not been doing, bleeding green. >> all proceeds go to our veterans, doing wall of heroes in the restaurant, it goes to helping brave men and women back into mainstream of business. neil: good for you. when we come back, attention college stunts and just graduated sledg college studente graduated sledg college studente july 1, you are about to get

if you've got it, u know how hard it can be to breathe d ma you know how that feels. copd includes emphysa and chronic brchitis. spiriva is a once-daily inhaled copd maintenance treatment that helpspen my obstructed airways for a fufull 24 hours. you know, spiriva helps me breathe easier. spiriva handihaler tiotropium bromide inhalation powder does not replace fast-acting inhalersor sudden symptoms. te your doctor if you have , glaucoma, trouble urinating, or an enlarged prostate. these may worsen with spiriva. discuss all medicines youting, otake, even eye drops.e. stop taking spiriva and seek immeate medical help if your breathing suen worsens, your throat or tongue swells, you get hives, vision changes or eye pain, or problems passing urin other side effects include dry mouth and constipation. nothing can reverse copd. spirivhelps me breathe better. does breathing with copd weigh you down?

don't wait to ask your doctor about spiriva. bjorn earns unmited rewas for s small business take theseags to room 12 please. [ garth ] bjors small busiss earns double miles on eve purchase every day. produce delivery. [ bjorn ] just put it on my spark card. [ garth y settle for less? ahh, oh! [ garth ] great businesses deserve limited reward here's your wake up call. [ male announcer ] get the spark business card from capital one and earn unlimited rewards. choose double miles or 2% cash back on every purchase every day. what's in your wallet? [ crows ] now where's the snooze button? neil: come july 1, student lone rates double. they do n have anything to do about it unless they have connects, government connections, staffers get a pass on this hike,ome say they should take a hike, if college

loan rates rise they should rise for everyone sabrina you say another example of government dark side on subsidie orchestrated by @%vernment with pre preferential treatment. >> they are trying to attract talent to the government, there is no bottom line. this is a artificial attempt to get good people, but distorting student loan market not fair to the rest of american students. neil: you know, that was argument if you went into gornment wor you would -- what you lack in pay you would get in benits or job security. >> you know, don't have a problem withs, whether it may help attract people who vernment might not get

ordinarily. il: deal maker would be a low rate? >> i think it is a way t offer benefits to people who are under paid. help attract the better peopl smarst people to government, but the problem is we should treat everyone the se. we have not give this benefit to people who work for government. the student debt csis in this country is a horrible crisis, probably the most serious financial crisis we're facing a a nation, a trillion dollars, government has to do something something about this gbally. neil: they are not. >> this is $100 million in a trillion dollar -- >> rounding it? a lot of rounding. >> the thing is we have a $1 tllion student loan problem

problem. 150 billion more in that market increases college tuition. you want to look at forest not the tree, the tree is 100 million-dollar program,nd terrible job market. you work for the house of representative you might make $30,000 a year this one program is not the bell end all, it is 150illion we're giving out. it is the horrible job market. have you a better chance of getting an std in college, getting a job out of college. neil: i am a little alarmed that you would know that. you are a young guy. but, is a breen a-- is asabrint does rtle a number of americans. it could be perceived to be a double standard, idea,ait a minute those -- in government, have a nice health care system, notoing to switch to the new

one. and now, some young people there have a nice sort of a kushy college lone gar abty -- college loan guarantee protection. so they -- that doestick in a lot of people's craw. >> there are some misconceptions about what congress is exempted from and what it is not people do not go to work on hill for government becausef great salaries, they go because they have opportunity that come from those positions. we need to you know track the pattern. before 1984, true. congress was on a separate retirement plan, they didn't pay social security taxes, before 1995 they didn't have to follow civil rights regulations, and labor regulations, that so many businesses have. now we still see congress does not have to follow things. neil: there is that double standardhing. back in clinton days, bill

clinton tried to stop that notion of their way, our way to an every way and this gets back to the notion, i knew i could not trust those government way t guys. >> i agree with you, problems that this is a double standard, congress is doing nothing about solving a $1 trillion student debt crisis, the are giving people who work for them this special benefit, that special benefit was en acted over 20 years ago, before we hadhe crisis. it is extended now. neil: you say it keeps tuitions rising. >> it does, when my parents went to college it was $5,000 a year it is $$40,000. college is increasing, it is unaffordable it has become a way to extend childhood, it is not a way to get a job any more, people who study philosophyor 5 years, they don't look into

future for that. neil: you have a lot of angry philosophers out there. but you right be right. bottom line, it is happening that deadline is close. maybe they wi long. > money with melissa francis is next. melissa: i'm melissa francis and here's what's "money" tonight. the irs has been doing such a great job. itits employees are getting $70 million in bonuses. waitwhat? how on earth is this possible? congressman john mica tells us if insanity can be stuff stopped >>can money be pulled out of politics forever. owner of ben & jry's will be here to tell us now. "who made money today"? not even a recall could stop him from making money. not sure who it is? stay tuned and find out. at the end of the day it is always about money.