troit, amica is in big trouble. that's our show. see you next week.d mario, we'll miss you. thanks for being here. >> thank you, mario. >> thank y for being here. see you tomorrow. ♪ raise your wages pushing the minimum to the max. it's going national. more wage protests planned in more cities this week and democratic lders in d.c. are showing their support. >> we have put forth legislation to raise the minimum wage. >> it's time for the minimum wage to go up! >> but some job creators warning super sizing the minimum wage will downsize our already shaky job market. are they right? hi, everyone. i'm brenda buttner. this is bulls & bears.

here they are, gary b. smith tracy burns, jonas max ferris, john layfield along with david mercer. welcome, everybody. gary b., will maximizing the minimum wage minimize or maximize our job growth? >> well, brenda, it's going to kill job growth, especially when you get right down to it what the minimum wage does, it discriminates against less-skilled workers. it's plain and simple. new york in 2006 raised their minimum wage from about 5.15 to 6.75. they saw a 20% increase in unemployment against younger lesser skilled workers. in 2007 before the recession started, unemployment amongst young black teenagers -- i want to get the figure right -- was about 29%. now, after all the stimulus and what we've done, it's 40%. so clearly it works against these workers, and, you know, the argument that the left makes

is, well, these businesses can't afford it. first of all, most small businesses, brenda, can can't ad to pay more. but even if they can, even if you're walmart, they say, they can afford it. i'd like to know from the left what happens with those earnings that go out as extra wages. those earnings are retained as profits so walmart, sears, oever, can build businesses and hire more people. they have ss profits to do that. they can't expand their business. it also hurts unemployment. it's horrible. >> david, i think he's talking right to you. what do you have to say back? >> well, i'll say that, with all-time profits now being experienced by corporatio, it's about time, after four years, that workers get a fair share of that. and i think in it doing so you help the economy by giving them re affordable wages to have more economic security. that puts in more buying power and increas demand that overall increases growthin the

economy, leading to other hiring. so in that instance, i think it's about time that we raise the minimum wage. >> john does this just ignore supply and demand. >> completely. i love the argent here that the companies are making so much money, how dare they make so much money. and i love the jobs plan. you have companies with a lot of cash on balance sheets so the jobs plan of the administration is, we want you to take that cash and hire people you don't need. look, the minimum wage affects only about 2.9% of workers, a understand the average family that has a minimu wage worker makes $53,000 per year. people are in poverty because they don't have jobs. people are not in poverty because they're making minimum wage. >> and talking about jobs, tracy, the job eators, small business, gary mentioned this, are they the ones who will get hit hardest by this? >> absolutely. you raise the mimum wage, they can't afford the extra dishwasher in the kitchen. and why should they when they can have family members do it? it hurt hads entry level obs.

it will hurt our teenagers. brenda, the goal in life is not to be on minimum wage forever. people forget th. that's your entry. your goal is to do a great job and get promoted and move. thisotion we'll keep raising it just to share the wealth because we're almost socialists at this point is ridiculous. >> jonas, unions are really pushing this. why do you think that is? >> because they're losing members that are way above the minimum wage and they need to get a whole new group of people, who are minimum wage workers who work at fast food restaurants. that's a side story. there should be a correlati between raising the minimum wage and higher unemployment because it makes sense you're raising the cost of labor, demand less. lieve me there's none. people look for it. some states have higher minimum wage, washington state has a much higher minimum wage than the federal level and they're in the top half of states with low unemployment. georgia has got a really -- they've got -- their own state wage is lower than the minimum wage and they have high unemployment. it's hard to say it blatantably

causes unemployment. there's definitely a level you could set it at that would cause massive unempla higher level in adjusting for inflation. we're not there yet. i don't know why democrats when they were in power didn't set index but they used it as a political tool to win elections because it looks like they're doing something for the working man beuse they have solved this problem, like social security, a long time ago by indexing this to inflation. gary b., you've been shaking your head. >> i just gave an example. you have to looktate by state. it's difficult to compare minimum wage across the states or across the country because as jonas alludes to, every locale is different. but as i said, you can look at new york state. to david's point,again, he want to come back to a point, if it's a walmart, for example, you think, walmart has enough money to pay their employees more. look, maybe theyo, but the fact is walmart takes those earnings they have and they open more stores! i don't know what an average

walmart store employs, maybe a thousand workers. if they have less earnings because they're paying all their pele more, they can't open that store and then they can't employ another,000 wo thousand . >> then cut the ceo pay. >> cut the ceo pay will pay for all the minimum wage for the 200,000 walmt people? >> starbucks is opening up stores and they're in favor of raising the minimum wage. >> david, is none of your business what walmart does with its money. >> i'm not saying it's my business. but we're talking the news here t. is my business. >> walmart has the choice to do what it wants with its money. >> and they can. and competitively -- look,f the minimum wage is raised, that's for everybody. that means it's an equal playing field. >> no, it's not. >> mcdonald's has to pay a minimum wage just like any other hamburger maker and so -- >> no. >> that is the ca. >> john? >> with the federal minimum wage. >>o, it's not an equal paying field. this is a populous message. this is nothing but political

malarkey. hey, look, we're trying to help the small guy. you're not -- >> not to the person receiving minimum wage, it's not political it's income. >> let me finish, david. take walmart and gary b.'s hometown of washington, d.c. they pssed thealmart rule. 75,000 square feet or more. that only affects walmart, you have to pay your employees 50% higher than competitors. what did walmart do? they did e smart thing, we're not opening stores. walmart has lowered food inflation by one percentage point. that helps the poor. they don't get this in washington, d.c., because of this political bs. >> david? >> i just say walmart can find its market somewhere else because -- >> but that takes jobs away. >> that takes jobs from d.c. >> the job they're offering at the wage they're offering means you have to have two jobs when you work for walmart. >> david, they have people lining up for those jobs! al at every walmart they open, people line up for the jobs. >> if the jobs were so horrible, people would s, i'm going to go elsewre and look for a job. >> and let walmart do it.

as we all said, it's walmart's business. let them do what they want. d.c.'s not having it. >> this isn't about walmart. they're paying people higher than their competitorss it is. >> but they're cutting their nose to spite their face. they're saying rs walmart, if you don't pay, then walmart doesn't provide 1,000 or 2,000 new jobs. is that what you want? >> there will be others that come in that see it as -- >> there hasn't been. >> brenda thshgs is a small business story, too. these are the creators of the jobs in our country. we're looking to these people to give opptunity out there. and you know what? if you're going to raise the minimum wage to $10, that's almost not worth it for me to hire the dishwasher in the back. >> that's a living wage instead of a poverty wage. >> it's not worth it for me. you have to remember that. so there goes another job. it just makes no sense. >> and, jonas, does it also stifle other start-up businesses from getting into the business and hiring other workers? >> i just don't think a lot of start-up businesses are hiring

minimum wage workers ithis economy. again, there's a level that would hurthe economy, but there's something going on also which is that the government already redistributes wealth to lower income people. and this is sort of mandating that a company does it with their especially excess profits. however, if we did that and also lowered the earned income credit, it could actually balae out. >> i'm sorry, jonas. we've got to pay our bills but you all earned your salary with that one. thanks, guys. unions chiming in on detroit's bankruptcy. the afl-cio calling on president obama and congress to pass an immediate federal bailout of detroit. but the cashing in crew says not so fast. they have a free rket solution at won't cost taxyers one cent. that's coming up at 11:30 a.m. eaern. but up next, want to overhaul our massive tax code?

toc chemicals and carcinogens are leaching into the environment. it's happening right where we . everywhere. cigarette butts are toxic waste. let's stop the toxic litter. learn more at rethinkbutts.org

bears." no tax reform until the tax hikes, and not just any hike. senate majority leader harry reid saying he wants $1 trillion inew taxes before even considering overhauling the tax code. but, john, you say he has this backrds? >> yes, has this ckwards. look thshgs is what's wrong with

politics. take reid, pelosi and boehner on extended vacation, then when they come ba, tell them not to. that would helthe country. reid says he doesn't see it, hasn't read it but is against it. we have a tatax code that's ridiculous, gives favors to big business and people with power. it's happened for decades. that's why we have 72,000 pages of an irs man you'll. that's why we'll pay the highest tax rate because i can't buy off the crooks in d.c. because i don't have money, influence. that's why google, amazon, all are paying 16% to 18% corporate tax. overhaul the entire system. that fixes it. >> jonas, you say we need spending cuts and tax hikes. >> yes. this revenue neutral thing, it doesn't work. the bottom line,we're never going to get out of the budget deficit with athing revenue neutral. we have to cut spending and raise revenues. there's no way around that. can it be put together with mething like that? yeah, we could remove the

deductions chshgs is why americans most pay a a single digit federal tax rate. it's hard to say -- who cares if this their rate goes up a little because some of the deductions are taken away. however, wcan't go -- the biggest tax deduction is all the levels of housing deductions for mortgages and depriation levels for those who rent, if you remove that to remove deductions, home prices will fall 30% in a year and cause a foreclosure mess. you have to phase out over ten years. >> gary b., we're talking about a trillion dollars in tax hike snz. >> bnda, it's astronomical. i don't see just to talk to jonas for a second, why we can't cut spending and cut renues. that's another way to get around this arrhythmia -- this equat n equation. i zrach my scratch my said. is there some evidence that giving more money to the

government is effective? do we have some evidence that the government is somehow efficient? we just spent a trillion dollars with the stimulus. has that helpe at all? i don't see it has. is there evidence anywhere in the world that bigger government is somehow better? no. is there evidence that government spending just the bottom line is somehow efficient? no. i mean, we haven't even officially started obamacare and, what, it's already three times over-budget, giving more money to the government is exactly the wrong way to go. >> david, what do you think of this? >> i'll go back to jonas' point inpproaching the budget both with revenue and spending cuts, and i though what the real debate is with the finance commtee chairman -- with chairman baucus and senator hatch along with reid, look, don't give me reform if it's revenue neutral. give me reform that's revenue generating so we can, as we have in the last two months, bought down our budget deficits by generating additional revenue to the tune of closing loopholes of

$975 billion, goes to reducing the deficit. if we're going to have tax reform with closing loopholes, let's do it with -- >> it's not about the budget, brenda. the segment is about tax reform. no one has the political you know what to say, yes, let's junk the book like john said. this is a book of favors. you never can patch work fix it. you ha to have someone willing to do political suicide and say for the good of the country we have to start over. to go forward with this thing one more day, one more yr is going to keep this country in deplete deficit because no one understands it enough. don't tell me for a second harry reid does his own tax return. heoesn't even know what he's talking about when it comes to taxes. we have to junk it and start over. >> all right. we've got to end on that. thanks, guys. and how about this for hypocrisy? one cash-strapped state is planning to force workers to start saving cash. the cavuto on business gang

saying this is a start of a new government creep wshould all be worried about. that's at the bottom of the hour. but up here first, bailed out. now busted. the startling number of rescued homeowners back in default and why another bailout may on its way.

so remember those taxpayer-backed bailouts for homeowrs? what if i told you that nearly half of those who hadtheir loans rescued by uncle sam are defaulting again? and tracy, you say tis is just

more proof that bailouts don't work? >> brenda, they do not address the problem. the problem is people didn't have jobs toay the mortgages. so you can change the iterest rate six ways until tuesday, if you don't have a job, you still can't pay it. the people who end up paying it are the taxpayers. we're again on the hook for a bailout that went absolutely nowhere. the only people who benefitted are the banks. move e coffers are packed with cash. this is simply good for politics andd votes in november. >> david, another bailout make sense? >> listen, i think what has to be looked at is the process of the program itself and how some banks, namely bank of america, where employees have even testified that they were preventing foreclosures, they were delaying the paperwork, and so farther that led to the high rate of foreclosures we see in the loan modifications. d they weren't offering them anreal decrease in their principal, maybe 10%. so i think the banks have to be

looked at and work withthe federal government to review those processes to why -- >> well, the government has se problems here,oo, didn't it, gary b.? >> i don't know h this became a corporations are a bad thing.. we're talking about, back to tracy's point, changing behavior. that's what bailouts don't do. whether they didn't have a job, whetheade more than they did, it doesn't -- when we bail out eitherhe banks, which i think those troubled asset relief stuff is still on the books, or the homeowners, it doesn't change anything so it's just spending other people's money. >> john, what does this tell you about bailouts and homeowners and the whole -- and foreclosures? >> it tells us that bailouts don't work, especially when you're bailing out homeowners. we're going to bail out car loans next, credit cards? this is insane. the problem here is not the banks. the banks have their eun fault. the problem here is the programs. none of these worked. one of the pograms you have to be current on all your paymes. if you're current, you don't

need your mortgage modified. this was a disaster from the start. it's political. that's all it is. >> okay, jonas, weigh in. >> it did achieve the goal of slowing down a flood of foreclosures. at least now the real estate market can handle an additional homeowner in the market. we couldn't have handled that two years ago, everybody under water got foreclosed on in a two-moh period. this was not a bailout of the defaulter t. was a bailout of the bank. if you bought a $400,000ondo that went to $200,000, a bailout of the homeowner would have been a government loan to buy a new home for200,000, a good investment, not keep making payments on your underwater property. this was for the banks inheriting worthless real estate. >> what do you think, tracy? >> i think they'll renew it and it will be circular for a long time. the only way to fix it is if the job market comes back. >> that's the last word. thanks, guys, thank y to david for joining . >> pleasure to be here. well, talk about a buzz kill. beer salesdown because that

payroll tax is up? but there's one name still tapping profits, and i just gave

the most recent southwest airlines crash at laguardia, it's one of many. the airlines have to improve the saty or the industry is going to get hurt. >> keep the government out of

it. >> your prediction, gary b.? >> taco bell is getting rid of kids' toys, good for mcdonald's think the stock is up 30% over the next year. >> jonas, you like mcdonald's? >> no, i do not. this is a richer onomy. >> jonas, your prediction/. >> okay, google lached this $35 tv adaster thing which is good for google but also good for needing wi-fi aadaptadapter netgear is up >> netgear had an unauthorized stock split on friday. i would avoid it for now. >> hence the deal. and john? >> less premium bear sales. we learned something in the depression, people are going to drink, go with coors light and tap up 20%. >> i d't know abt you guys but i am not disagreeing with john and beer, but gary b., what do you say? >> well, i'm sitting right next to it him. i'm goin to disagree with john? >> no. smart move if you're been arm's

reach. >> jonas? >> i say this is it a champagne food economy with the beer. >> we like that. >> okay and the freedom, the number one business bloc on tv tips, cavuto on business. the are latesmoney message from the president? >> this growing inequality, inequality of opportunity, ducingnequality, little more incattle, inquity is both inevitable a and just. inequality will coinue to increase. >> during his major speech on the ecomy, president obama using the word "inequality" more than "growth." is that any way to get america growing? hello, everyone. i'm charles payne in for neil cavuto. charles gas perino with his no shirt or tie, because clarlly's new book "circle of friends" in stores, online, everywhere.