neil: this just in, i just saw pigs flying, i just saw something i never thought i would, president obama wants to cut, cut corporate taxes, and further, he thinks it is going to create a windfall. i am neil cavuto, and ronald reagan he is not, but -- he is figuring tax cuts generate revenue. well kind of, because to make sure he is coupling rate cuts with what he calls one time hits on overseas earnings and slowing rates, such measures don't come

close to playing the new jobs and other domestic new jobs that he is pushing. i say, what the buck? is it the same barack obama who railed against corporate tax breaks any of sort. well, i'm take it. but first, since we talk about ronald reagan, may i suggestion we verify this president wants to spend that money before it comes in, nothing new there. we go slow from here, but a start, i president who sees wisdom of cutting taxes, for now, i say, here, here, enter my friend patrick buchanan who says not so fast. >> i knew ronald reagan, he was a friend of mine, and president obama is no renald reagan. neil: touche. >> you are right, if barack

obama believes as he said, that cutting corporate taxes really will increase revenue, it will make us more competitive. and it will create jobs, why don't you just go ahead and do it with the republican. i'm sure they would go along. he puts in here this spending increase, which he knows very well he is not going to get. and then he goes upside republican's head and said they are guilty of distractions and feeding on phony 6 scandals. i do not understand what message he is trying to send because they are in conflict. neil: when push has come to shove. when recovery was looking dicey. he seemed to recognize that there are times you don't entertain doing that, he changed his mind on upper income. but he seems to see the wi wisd,

partially, of cutting taxes for corporation. >> i think he does see the benefit. and also, his economy advisors tell him, we have corporate income takes rate 35%, which is number one or number two in the civilized world. it means a lot of companies don't like to come from overseas, and locate here. so why don't we cut them, and maybe we would be more competitive just like for example in tennessee. just like foreigner bring nissan and volkswagen plant to tennessee rather than illinois. i think he does get it. but ideology holds him back, he has to give nancy pelosi and reid, something he thinks for a big deal, therefore he gets no deal. neil: i think it will be hard to get a dial out of this, and i also think this headlines don't tell the whole story.

a lot of those companies could pay more taxes than now, but leaving that aside, this is an open salvo to republicans, what do they say or do some response? >> i think that republicans should say, you know mr. president, you have good ideas on taxes, on corporate tax rate, it needs too be reformed, we need klauer corporate tax -- need lower corporate tax rate, and we agree it would create jobs if we disagree on spending why not get together and work on corporate income tax reform that you are talking about, and maybe we can getting it and get something done. -- get together and get something done, like the immigration bill, why not, if they agree we have to have border security they have a good agreement, pass that, and put amnesty off for another time. then you can get something and obama would get something, this the republicans would get somebody. but he puts up these deals and

gives you a poison pill, and republicans say we will not take it. neil: they are in lagy heads here -- loggerheads here. >> i think it is what he think ising, he has some economists. when i came to journal eu678 in 196ism in 1962, jaak kennedy, td he will increase revenues. i got my editorial, saying he is right. he cut the top tax rate from 92 to 70s, and it got through under johnson it was beneficial. neil: true. >> democrats believed in these things. neil: i replayed that speech he gave froo oval office on that issue. and a lot of people cannot believe it they thought we were lip-synching it. >> i was around then, i'm like you. neil: i do not realize how old you are.

i'm kidding. no matter what hat says, to hear much of media tell us, the grand bargain is on. and price our o pressure on repo put game on to accept the cutss@ they wanted or look like hypocrites. it is interesting, the way i saw this portrayed brent to your point. just like what are the republicans going to do? >> well, i can't add to it. what pat said, but for, number one. the media are going to play this as some grand concession on the part of barack obama. in fact, barack obama ran for reelection on this. ly promised a cut in the corporate tax rate. do we not remember that? he did not say, i'll cut corporate tax rates in return

for xyz, so, there is no need to make a bargain. pat is right, if you believe it, promised it do it do not make deals. this is not a job creator, this is a net tax increase on businesses, jobs will not be created, they will be created by the government, someone needs to ask the question, which is, done we already try this? we'll call it the stimulus, how did that work out for you. here is one i like, a bargain, announced as a bargain, if we reach a bargain we have reached an agreement. whether a bargain is announced. there is no bargain, there is no agreement. they are projecting this as an agreement so if republicans say no it looks like they walked away from a dell they made. this is not the first time they have done it remember religious

mandate, catholic church said no, so obama administration reviewed it and said we had reached an accommodation, and catholic church said that is interesting but we did not agree to anything. that fine, let them do it. neil: media says -- you hit nail on head again. that the media then accept its and from the word that -- the president's word he has been the game changer, offering something he can say or will say, is something that republicans already wanted and he can go to media and say i tried. nothing worked. that will be his strategy going forward. that i offered them you know, an olive branch they stock it back in my eye. neileye. >> he said, that "fast and furious" is a phony scandal, and an american border agent died, and ben been is a phony scandal, and 4 americans died, and no one in press calls him out on that?

this is reprehensible. neil: brent amazing good to have you back. >> all right remember that job you applied for but you never got. what if i told you because the guy interviewing you was using a fbi database, that had everything wrong. to look for the best possible price maybe even better than you expected. it's all part of our goal to execute your trade in one secd. i'm derrick chan ofidelity investments. our one-second trade execution is one more innovative reaso serious investors are choosing fidelity. now get 200 free trades when you opean account.

peace of mind is iortant when so we provide it services you bucan rely on. with centurylink as your trusted it partner, u'llxperience reliable uptime for the network and services you depd on. multi-layered security solutions keep your information safe, and secure. and responsive dicated support meets your needs, and eases your mi. centurylink. your link to what's next. and responsive dicated support meets your needs, and eases your mi. a quarr million tweetersf musicare tweeting.eamed. and 900 million dollars are changing hands online. that's why the internet needs a new kind of server. one that's 80% smaller. uses 89% less energy. and costs 77% less. it's called hp moonshot. and it's giving the internet the room it needs to gro is ..s going to be big.

it's time to build a better enterprise. together. neil: i thought you killed it in the job interview. you stayed positive, and stayed alert, you left office thinking you had that job in the bag. only to discover you were bad. courtesy of an fbi file that interviewer had on you, that had it all wrong. it is happening more than you think. fbi dataa fraught with errors and rarely updated. to the judge. what do you think? >> i'm livid, we have reached a stage in our society, congress authorized fbi is sell its services to private entities, and so for a large category of nonfederal jobs, state, local,

and many private, congress permits those industriis to go to fbi for background safes, that is problem number one, constitutiostitution does not ae sale of federal services. when fbi does this, it often makes mistake, because magnitude of job involved. when you or i make a mistake and somebody suffers for it, we can be sued. but not the fbi, if they look at wrong database, and you don't get a job because of that, can you sue the fbi? no. you could sue that person unless they work for the federal government. neil: i see. >> then you can't sue them. neil: with later on dated bad info. >> yes. if i was going to hire you and you rejected me because of later

on dated or inact rat inaccurac, and a lost income because of that, i can sue you, but not from the fbi. we're not talking about wrongfully arresting somebody, we're talking about relying on dated or inaccuracies information. and in fairness to the fbi agencies some are my friends, they don't like doing this. >> what do they rely on that is wrong. if you had charges brought up against you but later exonerated they might have just charges. >> correct, if you have charges brought up against you, and you were exonerated and the judg expunged record. and so you will say under oath i was never charged for the crime. and potential employer will say, i have a record from fbi that

said you were charged. and therefore i am going t fire you because you lied to me. neil: i wonder when people are turned down for job, how much is based on faulty credit report information faulty fbi report information, and they never know, they just know they done get the job. >> i on't think the answer is knowable. neil: but you know everything. >> there little litigation over this, the potential employee. >> you will never say you got it off a fbi report. >> correct, and the person who did not get the job will never know why. in the rare case when there is litigation, and you are forced under oath to answer questions, you will say what happened. i have been subject of fbi investigations. neil: why am i not surprised?

>> to be appointed to the bench, that is type of investigation that to bfbi is familiar with,. neil: did you get to see what they had on you? >> i did. but massive numbers of investigations they don't like doing, it is a buck in pocket of their bosses paid for by company that hired fbi to do it, mistakes gal or. neil: interesting, you did make to judge. >> i saw that report, i still got the gig. neil: best selling author, ub aruber lawyer, judge et al judge napolitano. >> do you think he is a dope? i bet you he leaves baseball and sill set for life. [ male announcer these days, a small business can save by sharing.

li carpools... polly wants to know if we can pick her up. yeah, we can make room. ye. [ male announcer ] ...office space. yes, we're long this communal seating. it's great. [ male announcer ] the best thing to share? a data plan. at&t mobile share for business. one bucket of data foeveryone on the plan, unlimited talk and text on smart phones. now, everyone's in the spirit of sharing. hey, can i borrow your boat this weekend? no. [ ma announcer ] share more. save more. at&t mobile share for business. ♪

neil: well not a bad deal if you can get it, alex rodriguez stands to make a killing even if baseball fires him, and suspends him, how about $60 million to make him go away. here to make sense. sport agent executive james, a cool name. explain how that works, if you are getting thrown out for you know, using steroids or whatever. you still collect 60 million. >> you start with fact that these contracts are almost 100% guaranteed with limited exception, one is using illegal drugs, high would be suspended, then come back and collect remainder of his contract. neil: his contract with yankies would allow him to come back then, what if yankees don't want

you back. >> they don't have latitude to do that, only the commissioner does. neil: one way or other he will get a lot of money, he will get it. >> unless they fire him, an suss suspend him for during a of the contract. neil: elis ha selig has a fusir option, you challenge me, i will ban you for life. >> he is reportedly doing is using integrity of game clause in collective bargaining agreement. if you do anything to undermine the integrity of the sport, he can say you are fired. in which case a-rod would not collect a penny. neil: i always believe that everyone has a chance to fight a charge, this is whether you assume he is guilty or not, he

is not given an opportunity to challenge. he is just, dead meat. >> like in a lot of sports, if commissioner, they have rights, sometimes absolute. @% if they fire you, can challenge that in federal court. but with respect to major league baseball your rights end if you undermine the integrity of the sport. neil: that would assume in this case, a-rod admits use of the drugs? >> not necessarily, commissioner can say, have you not admitted. but i think you do it. neil: is that fair? i know what you are saying, it does not strike me as fair. >> it is not. neil: okay i'm saying he has nod admitted to using the substances and baseball commissioner saying, i just know you used them, and your heiney is fried for life. >> he will say here is the evidence we have against you, here is my decision, you are fired, what alex rodriguez does

he americans off to federal court and -- he marches off to federal court and challenges it. >> how up hill battle is that? >> it has been done, some won. neil: how do you think it will work out? most common scenario i see, is that. you know, he is out for next year and a half, gets a chance to come bark collects tens of millions life is good. >> i think that how it playsous, i think that commissioner will use leverage of lifetime ban to get him to capitulate, this year and next, and alex rodriguez will comeback and collect the remainder of his contract. neil: if you are yankees and you agree to this ban, you say, we don't have to pay, because, this is really egregious. >> yankees do not have that latitude. neil: are conttacts written in a

way even if you admit to or accept a ban you the team still have to pay, said drug user? >> once you come back from suspension, absolutely. if he comes back, he has 3 years remaining on his contract, yankees are still cob gate obli. neil: even though they would not want him back. >> absolutely not, he is a 40-year-old player, and has been deteriorating. neil: you remember when he would be next home run king, what happened? >> age, and reportedly, the ill effects of steroids. neil: wow. >> you take a risk. neil: what do you tell your own clients these days? >> you make sure they understand number one the rules and the risks in terms of take illegal drugs, players think that risk is worth taking because contracts are guaranteed. but you have to explain, times

are changes, prove of league is change -- the perspective of the league is changing, you have to remember that. neil: thank you, biel see ho wew it works out tomorrow. >> health care surprise alert, will be a daily feature, a big one that will have you wants to stick a si syringe into your hi. not ecessarily filled with steroids but any syringe will do. two words. double miles! this guy can act. anna play dodge rock? oh, you guys! and with double miles you can actuay use, you never miss the fun. beard growing contest and go! ♪ win! what's in your wallet?

♪ ♪ ♪ [ male announcer ] if y can't stand the heat, get off the test track. get the merces-benz you've been burning for at the summer event, going on now at your authorized mercedes-benz aler. but hururry, offers end july 31st.

[ susan ] i hate that the ason we're always stopping is because i have to g to the bathroom. and when we're siing in traffic, i worry i'lhave an accident. be right back. so today, i'm finally going to talk mdoctor about overactive bladder symptoms. [ female announcer ] know that gotta go feeling? ask your doctor about prescription tovia one toviaz pill a day significantlreduces sudden urges and accents for 24 hours. if you have certain stomach problems or glaucoma, or cannot empty your bladder, you should not take toviaz. get emerncy medical help rit away if your face, lips, throat or tongue swells. toviaz can cause blurred vision, dizzines drowsiness, and dreased sweating. do not ive, operate machinery or do unsafe tasks until you know how toviaz affects you. the most common side effects are dry mouth and constipation. [ susan ] today, i'm visiting my son without visiting every single bathroom. [ female announcer ] today, talk to your doctor about viaz.

neil: can we see that again? a new graphic, health care law, escalating laws are a big deal when they warn their own -- warn warrant their own independent fox news alerts. commissioner, one word, yikes. >> when you have guarantee issue, and eliminate under writes and increase benefits, you will see increased costs 92 this.neil: this goes beyond, whs going on? >> there is an increasing cost all of the time with increasing

utilization. but now is with the new policies that are issued under the affordable care act there will be 30 to 40% rate increases for individuals, for small businesses that is 5 to 20%. neil: we were told to be patient, this levels out. when it is up and running the premium increases will reverse, stabilize, life will be good, take a chill pill, what do you think? >> that is a big assumption. there are a lot of unknowns. i think it is clear whether you see increase benefits, and you eliminate underwriting and tell people, regardless of preexisting conditions they will be ga guaranteed healthcare poly that will be disruptive to marketplace, that is what we're seeing. neil: why is that a surprise? i remember covering this whole

saga on capitol hill, if you promise the sun, moon and the stars, coverage for preexisting conditions, gets your kids on the policy until a are 80 years old or whatever it is. if is naturally to know that premiums will have to come up. why was it denied? why is the obvious refuted ? >> i think part of the assumptions made is that younger people would get into the risk pool, with youngins vicinityibles getting in -- invincibles getting in they would not utilize medical services that would balance it out. neil: but they are not doing it. >> it remains to be seen, what happens january 1st, and how many of young invincibles buy the insurance policies. neil: a lot don't' it, unless in force of lock and key, they are

not doing to do it, what do you envision? >> you know, that is again, great unknown, if people do not buy that coverage, it will cause a rise in insurance rates for everyone. and it will be hard for system to be sustainable. neil: thank you commissioner. meanwhile david malpass said this is where americans are -- the healthcare law. it has everything to to with average americans seeingalth cas skyrocketing and getting squat for it. this is just latest wrinkle revealing itself. you predict many more? >> hi, neil, we're just beginning to see now the cost of the president's delay in employer mandate, cbo out this afternoon, one thing is that bill, was gigantic, thousands of

pages, largely of gibberish, as the implementatioation occurs pe assess the cost, most goes into washington. you said you could have bought a conto meniucondominium there ite gone up in value. neil: they don't come on to talk about it, do you get a sense they make sense when they say young people will sign up for the system. the gerth of everyone in together amortizes cost. >> no, they do this over, over, creating a big com complex piecf legislation, saying don't worry about it, that is same going on with dodd-frank.

financial services regulation bill that has grown into a huge -- that costly, when they wrote it, they said it won't cost much 992. neil: david maybe they are more cleaver than we think -- clever than we think, they wanted to push at the time they were pushing this that became law, this idea single pay system they dropped with their hope being that would happen, what you are outlining, that is where we might go. >> >> some people may have recognized that as a strategy. but i think you are giving them tto much credit. i think it is chaos going on in drafting process, remembered onty of obama carry bill was add machine tration did not lay down a proposal they waited for congress to write it. it came out of nancy pelosi out of the ways and means committee. that is not the way to make decent legislation, it has thousands of quirks, each

congressman has several legislative assistance working in the areas, all sticking in their preferred provision. neil: what do republicans do. they say cripple it, and defund it. but others say it is the law of the land. what do you think? >> i think people have to make a clear push back to the president. say we want you to lead. you are the president, you have to state your priority on immigration reform, your priority 92 on health care thing? >> same there. mr. president this law does not work. it has to be fixed. the proposal has to come from him. he sign -- >> when he said be patient, it is rolling into place, you can't whine about something that is not fully rolled in. >> they did on this employer mandate was the administration is not following the law. and so that causes legal chaos

in the country, if you have president where law is clear. er mandate to start january 1st, president has said, i'm not going to do that, it may be the law but i'm not going to do that, that is in the a recipe for any solution. ball is in president's court to say look that is not what the law said 92 david malpass if you. >> all this time i thought that stupid google glasses were sometime for watching movies, who knew they could be used for making movies. [ male announcer ] eligible for medicare? that's a good thing, but it doesn't cover everything. only about 80% of your part b medical expenses. the rest is up to you.

so consider an aarp medicare supplement insurance plan, insured by unitedhealthcare insurance company. like all standardized medicare supplement plans, they pick up some of what medicare doesn't pay. and save you up to thousands of dollars in out-of-pocket costs. call today to request a free decision guide to help you better understand what medicare is all about. anwhich aarp medicare supplement plan works best for you. with these types of plans, you'll be able tvisit any doctor or hospital that accepts mecareatients... plus, there are no networks, there's a range of plans to choose from, too. and they all travel with you. anywherere in the country. join the millions who have already enrolled in the only medicare supplement insurance plans endorsed by aarp, the needs ofeople 50 and over an organization serving for generations... and provided by unitedalthcare insurance company,

whh has over 30 years of experience behind it. call today remember, medicare supplement insurance helps cover so of what medicare doesn't pay -- expenses that could really add up. these kinds of plans could save you up to thousands in out-of-pocket costs... you'll be able choose any doctor who accepts medicare patients. and you never need referrals. so don't wait. with all the good years ahead, lookor the experience and commitment to go the distance with you. call now to request your free decision guide. this easy-to-underand guide will answer some of your questions, and help you find the aarp medicare supplement plan th's right for you. neil: twitter teasing, homer simpson snoring and say saudi

prince whining, to blitzing, item one is twitter, one step closer to an ipo. you have to wonder. a person who would be responsible for filing company'. we think that twitter might have a plan. >> a calculated hint from a company that insists we're not thinking about it. but you put in a job description to file an s-1, twitter value, is to be -- do not go publi publiccalla facebook leave yourself some room to grow. neil: i think that dennis is right, they got way too greedy at facebook, they are still paying price.

this is a smart company, their ipo will be next, by then we'll have forgot en about facebook ipo. neil: facebook is closing back in on that ipo price. >> it has been a long time. this is a consumer company, they always take off, facebook was the exception, it has tomorrow to -- potential to run away. >> if you bought facebook at open, stop your whining and hold it long-term they will earn it out, we could have bought it atcho22 a share. neil: geeky goin google glassesd be the movie making app rate us of tomorrow. they are enlisting students from 5 colleges to make movies.

>> i think this is so stupid. i am sorry. no. self reporting filmmaker will -- make a movie to release in theaters, by using google glass. average american is on camera, 16 to 20 times every day in this country, stop worrying about ago. worrying google glass, and the thought of now we're on tours, so air began the. neil: we might be old enough to remember blair witch project, that is -- you know video camera, that cheapened whole look but at the time it was cult evolving. who is to say the glasses can't do it. >> it would be great for a lot ofr rio de janeiroality tv -- fr reality tv this shores up, this is a product in search of a

market, it is cool, maybe some day they will put a chip in our head with this technology. but i don't think that people fully appreciate it at this point. neil: just a doubter. >> i feel like, you know there was a lipstick cam, in u.s. football league, why is google glass special. neil: you are hating. issue 3, google glass my be dicey but homer simpson is not, if folks at fox are right, "the simpsons" could fetch as much as a billion bucks in a cable send syndication deal, that would rival "seinfeld" which is true. aal? a homer run. >> it seems like a lot for a

catune but -- cartoon, but programming that we've seen, in last 5, 10 years has not been that good. the satire is funny, who knows maybe, it seems rich, i don't think that you know mr. byrnes at nuclear powerplant has nose numbers. neil: 25 years of history. >> this is 500 episodes over 25 years. now big question for 21 century fox, our new parent company, we're having just spun off by news corp or reverse, will we dare sell it to outsiders or our sibling channel fx . that does not bridge in new money, that is bringing in money from be on pocket to the other. >> you say we would do something that looks on surface shady. >> every god corporate

accounting -- every good corp at corporate account department. neil: now. saudi prince, worried about fracking thing, said our newfound fracking technology have made this country more energy independent, which means we needless oil from his country, the prince is worried. >> maybe he should be ore happy that our own president has concerns about this? >> he is a big investor in u.s. companies, i believe a big holder in citigroup. u.s. companies do better if u.s. is less dependenta saudi arabia and others. neil: what do you make of that? >> we'll burn every drop of that saudi oil, it is just a matter of what price, i don't care how much gas we find here, we're

still going to need and use that oil. he should be worried about tapering, he practically owned citigroup, what is she going to do when they can't sell their mortgage backed security to the fed. that is what he ought to be whining about. neil: now get ready for bigger payments to farmers who long ago bought the farm. see whether you reap. d. a quarter million tweeters are tweeting. and 900 million dollars are changing hands online. that's why the internet needs a new kind of server. one that's 80% smaller. uses 89% lesenergy. and costs 77% less. it's called hp moonshot. and it's giving the internet the room it nes to grow. this ...is going to be big.

it's time to build a better enterprise. together.

neil: 30 million bucks to dead farmers that is how much a agency watchdog said they are paying out to farmer who are no

longer plowing the field, how does this happen, dan? >> neil, i can't look add three agencies, under department offing fing a agriculture that provide assistance to farmers, two did not have a procedures in place or a system to identify if payments were going to deceased individuals. neil: now, there was another agency i think connected to maybe farm assistance program, where they did have a better job of trying to police this after the fact they recouped about a third of money. why is it so inconsistent? >> well, the we actually reported on that agency, farm service agent in 2007 we have recommendations if that are agency to make improvements to how they over see the program. in particular, doing data

matching. to identify potential deceased farmers that receive payments, so, they in a sense got a head start, and made changes in program. this year, whether for our newly issued report, we added 2 other agents under usda, and found they made the same progress. >> i can understand the way that bureaucracies work. but you know, you hear of you know, drug prescription written to the patients who had long died by doctors who had long since died. but there was an effort made to get that money back, but it is easier said than done, right? i1 have you offered the deceased farmers, i agency has to reach out, and do due diligence to determine whether the payment was proper. and then once they make that

determination, then they need to follow-up and see if they could recover the funds, about a third of the dollar that one of agent identified has been recovered. and they are working on, that but it is a difficult matter, 1 the payment are out the door. neil: what if a spouse or child of said diseases farmer carbs that check, if they committed a crime in. >> they are held liable, if it did determined that payment was improper the funs have to be returned back. neil: wow. dan thank you. we appreciate it. >> dan garcia. >> all right, think anthony weiner is the most di despicable politic is alive, this guy one upped him, mayor touchy and feely, very costly.

>> i was placed in a filner head lock, and moved around as a rag dog while he whispered sexual comments in my ear. neil: that is nothing. wait until you hear what filner is whispering in san diego taxpayer ears? not forgive me, but more like, pay for me. the decision whether it will ever come to pass, become tonight. there is precedent for city council helping pay legal bills of beleaguered or targeted politicians on a host of lesser matters, to this matter. jedediah? >> can you think od -- odded on.

he is somehow transferring that responsibility to taxpayers, saying, you know you are now responsible for defending me, you are responsible for getting me out of this hole i dug myself into. he is a disgrace, he should resign, and people of san diego will side with me. >> i think that ity of san diego on the hook for his behavior? he harassed women, they will sioux citsuethe city of san die. he is a creep for eposing taxpayers. for his behavior. you know. neil: argument, late today that those harassed say, if you dare city council, pay his legal bills we'll see you for that. i am just cutting to gest of

this, to julie a point, turning into a huge debacle. >> it is, but, in terms of paying his bills, you have 7 of 9 council me councilmembers wanf office. i think that they will decline the request. neil: how muc how much -- he isg into a therapy class. so he goes to two weeks. does this, does that absolve him? >> should we pay there are that as well? where do you draw the line? it does not absolve him, you hold public office, you hold a responsibility. neil: you hold politicians to a higher standard. >> i do. neil: there is a language history. >> that -- long history.

>> that is their problem, and they should resign. neil: a lot would be out of office. some americans heroes from thomas jefferson, and kennedy. >> that would leave room for the fresh blood i have been praying for, for a long time. neil: jefferson? >> absolutely. neil: what do you think? >> you should hold ceo of goldman sachs to same sta standd of ceo of san diego. >> it is public offers though. >> i don't care. neil: what don't you care about? >> if you violate the law, sexual harassment is, i i don't know care if you are in a management position in managed or mayor of san diego? >> you don't put politicians to a slightly higher standard? >> i just' these to do a good

job, stay within the law. i am asking them to did a good job, if they cheat on their wives i do know care. but -- >> you know age old argument. god knows who else you will cheat on? >> we would not have a thomas jefferson, or a fdr or jfk, and a bunch of very good presidents in my view or bill clinton for that matter,. neil: what do you make of that argument? it has raised other arguments, and one thing that. anthony wean ar weiner said we'd on. >> it is up to voters in san diego case, the voter overwhelmingly' him to resign, you see in new york with weiner. neil: in past they elected him? >> well, that is true. but you know once it comes out 92 a time when nixon won a landslide reelect in months, was vilified and they wanted him

out, they had to wait a couple years, when it is apop rate to say tata . >> when facts come out, they are still coming out in san diego, they have come out in new york, the public can make up their mind it's time to go when you have done these kind of terrible behavior in san diego they are illegal. >> it is when there is a repeated pattern of deception. a lot of people look at weiner, he came out and apologized were willing to forgive him. >> do you think that was' special level of creepiness. >> yes. neil: any time you you know, take pictures of your private and send them to people, on a certain level that is just gets weird. >> i could not vote for him even after round one, but i think many people could have, but with a repeated pattern, repeated lie. neil: a special class of itself. you know?

>> you know, the young lady in question, went on howard stern said he is so busy doing certain things he would not have time to be mayor, i think she is right. this is a guy who is obsessed and has an issue that prevents him from doing anything other than -- >> john kennedy was a horn dog, how he got disabled to dial with the crisis, he dealt with the cuban missile crisis but he had a very -- should it matter? >> it. look, a big difference with weiner after lying to voters,. neil: weiner is no kennedy. >> my problem 92 on number one problem, i thought he was a bad congressman. neil: there is that. >> is that is why i would not have voted for him. neil: he comes at a time, right, left, they happen in ways here

that it -- it is hitting basic trust issues in our government, leaders, is it justifies ? >> they do come in waive -- in waves, people hear the story, more people come forward, this behavior is wrong, politicians live in a different world now, 24 hours news, twitter, they are held to different standard world today is different from the world that jfk governed. neil: they all moved on. spitzer will win. >> right, but would you -- you accept a certain level of responsibility. you know your life is public. you cannot handel that responsibility, don't run for public office. you open baembarrass yourself. neil: tv anchors, okay? >> my problem is what he is doing to his wife and son. neil: a good point.

but, tv anchor thing, okay. all right, i want to thank you all very much, we'll keep following this. we will get word on scandals, particularly san diego, by tomorrow at this time, see you then.m gerri willis. tonight onthe willis report" social security disability payments skyrocking. the entitlement program is bro the new report says most people getting a federalisability check are fully capab of working. also, the obama administration is frustrated with the rate of economic growth. and new fakes. just change how we measure the econy. >> cut our deficits by nearly half since i took offe. gerri: the inside scoop on the woman who sued h credit reporting bureau and $118 million. the case could be a big win for all of us. we're watching out for you tonight on "the willis report." ♪