now. melissa: i'm melissa francis and here's what's "money" tonight. call him putin the puppet maer. russia gives the u.s. its plan to rid syria of its chemical weapons. is it all smoke and mirrors though? and what's the connection between syria and the fed? why everyone's money is at stake. plus, it's the ultimate opportunity for small business everywhere. win your own free ad during the 2014 super bowl, i'm not kidding. the man behind the dream giveaway is here to tell us all about it. you could win. "who made money today?" he pulled in $10 million, but for all the wrong reasons. stay tuned to find out who it is. even when they say it's not it is always about money.

melissa: our top story tonight, a meeting of the u.n. security council is supposed to be getting underway right now over the syrian crisis of the president obama pushed congress to the sidelines last night to work on this so-called diplomatic plan. but are we just getting had? the senate is indicating it may vote on a syria strike as early as next week if diplomacy fails. will the house follow suit? joining me is congresswoman ann wagner from missouri. she has been against military attack. good to have you back on the show. >> nice to be with you. melissa: thank you. give me your reaction to what's going on today, the back and forth with russia and syria and the u.n. security council? i mean the location of the meeting has changed, the time, how do you feel about that? what's your take? >> it is the same ol' same ol'. we're all over the board in terms how we're handling this crisis in syria and the middle east and it is very concerning. we all hope for a diplomatic

solution. the president stated he had exhausted all diplomatic solutions. i like so many of my other colleagues are very skeptical of russia leading us in some kind after diplomatic answer when they have been, melissa, in with irannd hezbollah and the russians, really have teamed up with the ass regime all along. so this is a little bit like the fox guarding the chicken coop when it comes tohe chemical weapons and how they're going to move forward. melissa: it is but what is the better of the two options you see on the table right now? there's the idea of, you know, going into military action, and then this seems to be the other option of pursuing this diplomatic path. at the same time it feels like it could abate and switch. of those two which are you more comfortable with? >> certainly i'm against any military action. i do not believe the president has laid out a plan or any clear or achievable national security objectives n fact, melissa, i came back on monday, went

through the full classified briefings and i'm even more convinced we do not have an actionable plan. so you know, you hope diplomacy works but, you know, this is really, really tough and the devil is always in the details and i'm not sure, you know, pentagon put out a just two weeks ago said it would take perhaps some 75,000 troops in order to secure these mobile units, the chemical assets that the assad regime has amassed, all the artillery. it is a monumental task and i see this perhaps more as delaying and deflecting on the part of russia, who again, i have to remind everyone, has been in with iran and hezbollah all along with this regime. melissa: absolutely, but we need some kind of a resolution here. is there, i mean is there a way we could be pursueing a diplomatic option more effectively? would you like to see the president or secretary kerry

doing something specifically better? >> well you know what? it is working with the world community, it is being engauged in the region. we should have two years ago when we called for the assad gime to step aside, we should have worked with the rebels and opposition then to build this coalition. now they're infiltrated by real bad actors from al qaeda to -- melissa: without pushing you, i don't want to interrupt you but what can we do now at this point? i think everyone adegrees, or many people agree up until this point this situation has been mishandled. if it hadn't been we wouldn't be at the point we are now but what can we do right now? >> whether it is sanctions or con incontinuing to work through the u.n. and world community to try to put pressure on assad to stop annihilating and murdering along with the rebels all of his people. upwards of 100, 120,000 people. we'll continue to try to work towards this. but i have to tell you, melissa, we've gone from foreign policy sitting in the back seat to running the show, we're in the

trunk right now. it is make america look so week weak as a farm former united states ambassador i have to tell you on the world stage in terms of diplomacy and in terms of other things we're able to do, i don't see there being pursued and i have greatoncerns about, about the weakness of america and where we stand. melissa: given that, i me what did you think of the president's address last night? i mean he tried to stand tough on what he thought, you know, something that the world can't stand by and let happen. what did you think of the speech last night? >> well the atrocities are horrible. our heart goes out clearly, but you know, i think the vote was postponed. they can say they're going to the security council. they can say that russia is going to try and work to get assad to stand down but honestly i, he postpone ad vote because he doesn't have the vote. i don't believe he has it in the senate. i don't believe he has it in the house. more importantly he doesn't have

it with the american people. so we'll -- melissa: the scuttlebutt has been from senators if we don't see a good diplomatic solution as soon as next week that vote could come back. do you think woe have the support then? >> we'll see. he hasn't made the case so far. in fact i would say he has even lost ground in this. we're all over the page and i think we look weak, diplomatically, we look weak in the world. melissa: congresswoman wagner, thank you so much for coming on. appreciate your time. >> my pleasure. melissa: russia reportedly handed its plan to secure and destroy syria's chemical weapons to the u.s. secretary of state john kerry is on his way overseas to go over it with russia's foreign minister tomorrow but how do you go about securing the weapons in the middle of an active war zone? that is one big question. we have a chris harmer from the institute of study of war. thanks so much for coming on the show. we keep thinking we'll see details of the plan. that is what is in theory being discussed right now.

what would that plan have to look like in your expert opinion in order for it to be effective? what's step one? >> thanks for having me, melissa. there are at love different plans he could do but if it is going to be effective it has to be designed to specifically go after the syrian chemical weapon if you look at the past history of u.n. chemical weapons ininspectors or nuclear weapons inspectors, what they have been primarily a civilian organization subordinate to the. >> united nations going into permissive environment at least with ostensible cooperation of the host government. we'll not get that here. people need to understand that at the get-go syria is fundamentally different problem than iraq was in 1991 to two thousand three. >> you are saying they would have to be military inspectors? >> absolutely. melissa: how about the size or what are the parameters that would make it work? >> i think 75,000 is a scary number but i think that's a realistic number. the model i

use the navy construction battalion as from world war ii called seabees. we build, we fight. they were not snt there as infantrymen. they were sent there as construction workers who were capable of defending themselves against japanese attacks on islands of the specific. we'll have to design a force that looks somewhat similar to that. it would probably center around army infany battalions and marine corps battalions trained up in chemical weapons procedures and train and locate and track all the weapons. it will have to be a big commitment. my fear by taking the military option off the table somehow we convinced the public there is a cost-free or pain-free diplomatic solution. ion if we get russia and syria to agree to which is highly suspect in my mind we have to still go through the actual press of getting people into what is an active war zone and building all the equipment necessary to safely destroy chemical weapons. melissa: i think people are sophisticated enough to understand or to remember at least from some of the scenes

that were described in iraq. you talk about the inspectors coming in the front door and in theory the weapons going out the back door, that sort of thing. they understand it has to be a lot more solid than that and what you're outlining is a group that goes in with military capability that essentially, i mean do they build silos while they're there when they're confiscating weapons and putting them in and blowing them up or ow does it work? >> well the way the u.s. destroyed the vast majority of our chemical weapons stockpile with very high temperature incinerators. we would have to build several facilities similar to that last thing you want soldiers in a war zone to get their hand on chemical weapons and make them travel self hundred miles to a destruction site. if we learned anything out of iraq and afghanistan al qaeda and taliban specialized in convoys. they targeted them for destruction. they targeted them for exploitation. the last thing we need our soldiers taking possession of syrian chemical weapons and running around. you will have to build a lot of

construction facility and it will have to be built from the ground up, from the inside out as fundamentally military mission and not a civilian mission. melissa: i know it is probably impossible but if you were tasked with the idea of making it possible how would you make sure you got all the weapons? >> nothing's impossible if military history teaches us anything. if you have the will power and you have got the people behind you can do it. it would be extremely difficult. i would go in with 75,000 would be my starting point. this is how many we mead to dot mission adequately. i would go in with ships. and i would send equipment overland up into damascus, aleppo and homs. we set up facilities and start looking, start acquiring, start destroying. i have no illusions whatsoever, this would not be an easy mission. it would not be a cost-free mission. there would be casualties. it would be difficult. if you want to restore the syrian chemical weapons stockpile that is the only waa can do it at this point. melissa: chris, thank you very much. really informative. >> thank you. melissa: next on "money," to

regular americans care about syria? do think even know where it is? who else but john stossel hits the streets and joins us with this eye-popping report. do you know what the connection is with the crisis in syria and the fed? it is big and could have major consequences for your money. you probably haven't thought about this. don't go anywhere. more "money" coming up.

melissa: as the white house weighs its options on syria, fox business's very on john stossel took to the streets to find out exactly what americans think about the crisis and the answers he found, well, take a listen. >> where's syria on this map? >> i couldn't tell you where syria is on this map. >> no, that's iran. >> egypt. >> right here? >> saudi arabia. >> maybe that little one right there? >> this is israel. dth one? >> give me exact one? >> it's a country. melissa: yeah, i mean the exact one? you are so picky, you're so demanding. so hard on these people. >> in fairness that clip showed the people who didn't know but i was surprised, i would say two

thirds, 3/4 did know and could point to syria on the map. most people said we should not retaliate. we should not attack. melissa: they weren't, i mean they weren't swayed, we've seen that video so many times, it is so uncomfortable to watch. we stopped playing it here on the show, it is so hard to watch the bodies and gassing, it seems like it has been everywhere. that didn't sway them. >> i wasn't playing video for them. melissa: no doubt they have seen it, no? >> a fair number of clueless who had no idea what i was talking about. when i would say the dictator uses chemicals to gas -- melissa: his own people. >> his own peep, then some of them would say, then we have to do something. it is clear that most people don't pay attention to the news and, just trust that somebody else will make good decisions. melissa: well, if they don't pay attention they're not focused on it, how do they know they're against it and how does the president know it is not popular

thing? if they're not focused they can do what he want and afterwards, explain it and that he gassed his own people and people would be okay with, no? >> 1% of the people make things happ. 10% of the people watch things happen. the other 90 percent wake up next day and say what happened. melissa: yeah. >> you can ask the 10% who rough watching and get a decent answer but the polls ask people randomly and people want to please the pollster. melissa: you don't think it is a good idea for us to go do something about this. >> no. we libertarians get called isolationists for that. that is so unfair because we say, trade with everybody. let people and goods cross borders but, i'm an isolationist because i don't want to kill people? also there's a big difference between world war ii and this. in world war ii, hitler was knocking over whole countries and people we hated, france, england and they were clearly our friend and good people.

in this case -- we don't know. melissa: in this case, women, you know it is women and children and civilians and people who live there that aren't involved in the fighting who are getting knocked over. >> will we be aiding them if we arm the so-called moderates? in america pundits can't agree whos a moderate in congress even though we don't speak arabic, we're supposed to figure out who the moderates are in syriand help them? maybe we help the mujahadeen in afghanistan who then later came and attacked us on september 11th? it's, we had clear, as i say, helping france is one thing. helping the so-called moderes in syria is a much riskier bet. melissa: you say that we shouldn't be the police man to the world. president talked about that last night. let's listen. >> america's not the world's policeman. terrible things happen across the globe and it is beyond our means to right every wrong but

when, with modest effort and risk, we can stop children from being gassed to death, and thereby make our own children safer over the long run, i believe we should act. melissa: so with modest effort and risk we can save children from being gassed and we can protect our children from being gassed in the future. no? >> we don't know that we don't know that this will stop children from being gassed. it may increase the risk that our kids are gassed because what --ay we do what bill clinton did. we pound sand. we send missiles into the sand. we miss. what does that accomplish? let's say we kill a bunch of innocent people as often happens. we create new ins who may want to poison us. if we kill assadaybe the next people will be worse. i don't know that it makes us safer. melissa: what do you think of the alternative and what is going on right now with russia sort of brokering this peace? we look weak and all of this. does that diminish the standing around the world and make us

more vulnerable to harm and terror and everything else down the road? >> maybe. that doesn't mean attacking will enhance our standing around the world. people, all around the world hate us for what we do in the name of safety all the time and it feeds into the enemy's wish to portray us as big murderous bullies. melissa: john, i have to tell you i'm impressed, 2/3, 3/4 of opinion out there, don't have opinion what we should do necessarily could find it on a map. >> speaks wel for tour rids in times square. melissa: john stossel, thank you very much. don't forget to catch "stossel" tomorrow night right here, 9:00 p.m. eastern time. next on "money," the connection between syria and the next fed chief. i bet you haven't thought about this we'll tell you why it could have a huge impact on your money. you will not hear this anywhere else. the latest idea how to spend

taxpayerses money on health care. i kno, stick around. do you ever have too much

melissa: so there could be a surprising casualty of the crisis in syria? larry summers. summers is reported to be the president's top choice to replace ben bernanke as fed chief but summers isn't exactly everyone's favorite. so as the situation inhe middle east costs the president more time and more political capital, will summers get pushed aside as the next chairman of the fed? the answer could have big implications for your money. here to discuss it, steve moore of "the wall street journal", and jonathan hoenig of capitalist pig dot-com. welcome to -- capitalistpig.com. >> hello, melissa. >> welcome to both of you.

i heard this from someone very up flew wednesday with a lot of skin in the game. what do you think about this theory, steve? >> i think the theory is, is there may be something to it. it is pretty clear that barack obama need to repair his relationship with liberals capitol hill. they're not very excited about potential military action in syria. you know, they're not happy with the, with the sequester spending cuts. and so barack obama is losing a little bit of his left-wing base. now how do you recapture that? one requested, melissa, would be to put someone at the left really likes in the position of federal reserve chairman. and of course that is janet yellen. janet yellen is the first choice all liberals. melissa: yeah. >> in that case you would see larry summers being the fall guy. melissa: jonathan, what do you think about this? this was all the talk, before we got all wrapped up in the syria thing, this is on the front page and everybody was talking about,

this idea, this drumbeat, here comes larry summers. he is gathering more andore strength. he is the president's pick. here is what he would be like. they were de into the big sell and he got wiped off the front page. >> the president really likes larry summers. would love to have him as fed chairman. to steve's point, janet yellen is much less risky betty point, especially given how much the president's political currency is beinggused to make the case in syria even with members of his own party. janet yellen has been at the fed for a number of years. she would be the first female head of the federal reserve. compared to larry summers who has history of controversia remarks and stimulus she is much less controversial pick for this very important post. >> don't forget, melissa -- melissa: why is it important for the president to spend his capital on larry summer? i understand they're buddies. he feels good about him will do what he wants him to do. obama feels summers will do what he wants him to do but is it

really important enough for him at this point if he has some people, there was this big letter, open letter from 300 economists saying they want janet yellen. she's the gal for the job. alan blinder, christina romer, joseph stiglitz. the people going on and on about people lobbying him. this came out yesterday. i think they smelled blood in the water and they're pushing for it. steve, go ahead. >> all those people you just mentioned, economists, some are nobel prize winners but they're all kensyians. melissa: yes. >> they're all inflation doves. they love money creation. and, you know i'm not so sure that's a such a healthy situation. you asked the question why should barack obama you, you know, care about this? i would make the case other than a supreme court nominee and maybe even more so, this is the single most important position that will be appointed by president. no doubt about that. >> i think it is very important. i'm saying why would he care that much to put summers in over yellen at this point? because i think he would be, he

would like both of their policies. he is more comfortable, for sure, very important decision for all of us, are you kidding me? >> i'm not convinced there is a frontrunner between those two. by the way i'm not convinced, i think there are outsiders like, outside choices like tim geithner. i wouldn't even rule out the idea of ben bernanke possibly being reappointed which would be the first choice of everybody on wall street. melissa: that is a terrific int, jonathan. there is a lot of people that would like to see ben bernanke stick around. how did we get to this point anyway the scuttlebutt he is being forced out. we're the envy of the world in terms how we survived this crisis. the word is he doesn't really want to leave. this is really president obama firing him on charlie rose's show. why is that happening? >> even in it's yellen, if it's summers the policies are not going to be so different from that of ben bernanke. janet yellenerved with ben bernanke for quite some time now. she called forrcontinuation of

highly federal reserve policy. summers is very interested in intervening economy. was the architect of so much of the stimulus levied on the economy the past couple years. regardless whether summers or yellen, melissa, to your earlier point the president will likely be satisfied with either one. he will get his top pick in summers and progressive top pick in yellen. both of those picks are in favor of more intervention, in my opinion destructive for the economy. >> another interesting point. don't forget one of the most popular things bill clinton did as president, eight years as president, reappointing a republican, a republican as fed chairman. melissa: yeah. >> so i'm not ruling this out that ben bernanke is not reappointed. in fact i would say he is right there in the mix. the thing that makes me very nervous about larry summers, he has a god complex. i'm not so sure you want somebody with that kind of master of the universe complex heading up the federal reserve. melissa: no, steve. that is exactly what makes everybody so nervous.

there is that. the fact he is unpredictable. seems like, hate to anger him because god knows what will happen, he seems like he doesn't play well with others. >> that's for sure. melissa: flies off the handle. he is not terribly predictable. and this is, these are not qualities that aayone wants in a fed chairman. you want the calmest, person, that you can possibly imagine. and like you said, most people would like to see ben bernanke just stay where he is. that would be a huge win for the president. but why, it does feel like the president has really turned on bernanke. why? why did that happen, steve? what's your guess? >> i haven't, and i don'tave a clue because actually ben bernanke has been actually pursuing the kind of keynesian idea that barack obama believes in. i think the only thing that i can think of is, number one, ben bernanke was appointed by george w. bush and anything george w. bush does has to be terrible, right, according to this president? second thing to consider we haven't mentioned the fact that

janet yellen is a woman. i think there's a lot of sentiment among liberals to put a woman as the first fed chairman. melissa: there is still timothy geithner out there a lot of people like and would be another choice. jonathan, do you think he has a shot at this? >> another member, melissa of the president's very close inner circle. timothy geithner as fed chairman, timothy geithner got the whole bailout culture started in this country going back to aig, five or six years from now they're all very close to steve's point to the president's core economic philosophies. high intervention in the economy, keynesian economics and the as a result we know is unemployment above 7% for years now and trillions trillions of dollars in debt. melissa: there is john taylor who i would pick. >> my pick is neil cavuto. melissa: i love that as well. love that as well. thank you so much. perfect. i will take over his show. i love it. perfect. i didn't s that. next on "money" we'll tell you the newest place your tax dollars is going under the guise

of health care. seems like a huge waste of money. the chairman of the house oversight and investigations subcommittee will crunch the numbers. plus "who made money today?" he netted 10 million bucks but he is probably not going to get a penny of it. we'll have the answer coming up. and we'll tell you how to get a free super bowl ad. "piles of money" straight ahead.

♪ melissa: no matter what time it is, "money" is always on the move. shares of pandora getting a nice boost after hours. brian macandrews, former microsoft and quantitative executive is taking over the top spot for. the move is effective immediately. investors looking pretty happy with that. you can see the stock jumping. nineteen days left until people can begin buying health care from the government for periods to prepare the obama administration for his pain piles of "money" to people who

help the answer to navigate their options. he decries the numbers in the dollar's a stake is congressman tim murphy of pennsylvania. congressman, thank you so much for joining us. we are hearing a lot about these navigators and what they're supposed to be doing. basically they're supposed to meet a family and assess their real-life situation, their financial situation, their needs, they're supposed to go through what programs they may be eligible for. you know, whether it is medicaid and what tax exemptions and tax credits they might be able to get and then help them look through there health care options and then pick the best plan. boy, that sounds like something that would take a lot of trading. >> this sounds like is a job for an insurance agent. by law i cannot be. you -- instead what is happening is they're spending $7 million, written to hire people, and they cannot be people who work in the insurance business. so i've been talking. we sent out letters.

what kind of grades as they're looking for. have they done something with criminal background checks? make sure the project records because there are a lot of things that we don't have full interest in get. melissa: what has the response been like? this is supposed to be up and running in october. we have almost no time left. these positions have not been filled. they are supposed to pay, and a lot of cases, $15 per hour. in another you are going -- i mean, can they find these people and train them this quickly for that wage? >> it is going to be tough. there were supposed to have the trending down in august, and even if they do it now, they're not really going to know the insurance plans probably until october 1. delay after delay, and they will train them in some aspects. they have to go out of the next year and sign people up. supposedly it will be here is the laptop, let's go over the plans, you make a decision. supposedly they will make a recommendation. you will have people who will have to struggle through that. one of the great things about insurance agents coming here is

another thinghich i find out, is there anything in the law that says they have to protect and information? keep it confidential? and it is not there. that is what they introduced a bill that says that any irs agent that gets into the records, it is a criminal penalty. what happens with the information the navigator select? what will they do with it? and those questions are still yet to be answered. melissa: it does seem like we need to -- i mean, at the very least these people need to have background ccks because they're going to be exposed you're very sensitive financial and health information for you and your whole entire family. 6917 states their talk about trying to have regulations and limits and rules about these people that would be hired for the jobs. how is that going to back. >> the states will work on that, and we are trying to find out what is happening. there will be real variability between some of the plans. some have very high standards simply because they're already health care agencies. there will make sure people have

criminal background checks. other was not so much, and those are ones we will have to push to make sure that the laws are there or we will certainly keep them under the microscope. melissa: i s a quote from somebody who had already been given a federal grant and was in the process of hiring people with a company and in maryland. they said that it is just like selling girl scout cookies. they're going to go to the mall and set up a table and recruit people and sign them up. to me thais terrifying because they're being paid with my tax dollars to find -- sign people up to spend more of my tax dollars, and they see it like selling girls of cookies. >> that shows and gravel navy. he talked to someone who will be selling health insurance, you want to deal to provide the information, the best polic what does this and that cover and how this works? basically people were going to say, look at this computer screen and make a decision. that is not what people want for some of the most important churns they will buy. i am quite worried that there will not going -- that they will

not have the credentials. melissa: out is that training done? i personally dealt with the navigator related to health plans that my family has been on. you call them and they have a very detailed and intimate knowledge of the product. they can anticipate, well, if i choose this plan and this happens, what is not deductible and what am i paying in what is my exposure? those are a lot of contingencies in movg parts that they have to understand and be able to explain. i don't know that you could hire and train someone who will be that knowledge will on a temporary basis for $15 an hour. >> said think is going to be very difficult to get that particular because the war might even have products until october 1. they have to start selling these products on the same day that the products are released. it is like that at its, you have to talk to have passed health care bill the find out what is in and now seems the right to have to buy insurance to find out what is in it. not good. pressure on this. last week the "wall street

journal" ran an editorial. journalists were criticizing me. we have to do this. a lot of money at stake and a lot of people's personal health care commission. melissa: thank you so much for coming on. to up next,or any small business out there, this is your big chance. you could win a super bowl commercial for free for your company. think about it. a hundred million nuys worth $4 million. bill branson is here to tell you exactly how to win. i am not kidding. don't move. at the end of the day it is all about your free super bowl ad. ♪

♪ melissa: football season is only just begun, but the super bowl ad game is almost over, at least 85 percent of those coveted commercial slots are already gone.

also, about $4 million for just 30 seconds. so this is the opportunity of a lifetime for small businesses everywhere. a chance to win a free ad, no money during the 2014 super bowl. entrepreneur bill rancid is teaming up with software company intuit for the beginning giveaway industry to tell us all about it. why do this? >> it is to help small businesses. i am a big fan of small business. i am a small business owner myself, and this is a way that we can release celebrate what they do a also raise awareness . let people know how important they are to the community. you need to support your small business to keep things moving within your community. melissa: the jobs and revenue, the spirit of america. >> think about the small-business owner and what they do. the money stays in your community, sponsoring the baseball and soccer team, fixing a main street, implying people in that community. it goes on and on and on.

melissa: how do you do it? have been telling people all day that i will tell them how to do it. what is the first up? >> as easy as it gets. small business big game. 600 characters to tell us about your small business. we keep it easy. melissa: it's nothing but like pr. >> pretty quick and easy. we narrowed down. america votes. once we get the final 4i will show up and let another therein. one person will have that. melissa: 600 characters is kind of a lot. don't worry. >> it is not me. is america. you have to appeal to america because the people will be voting for you. >> and a first-round it is all the employees. you know, thousands and thousands of employees all over the world. they narrowed down. melissa: know what they're looking for. >> you have people in india, mountain view california.

so many different personalities and perspectives. it has to have mass appeal, i think. something that will be benefiting from. they want to make sure if you get this commercial it will reach 40 million peoyou want tot will be able to every ball the benefits of the exposure. melissa: tell me about your company, not you ad. then in the second round is says, complete activities to enrich your story, to help advance the top 20. what kind of activity? >> there maye challenges that we're going to have them go through to make sure they're worthy of getting this. one thing that you make mention. when the winner is selected with -- their will be armed with the right tools. melissa: you don't have to make appear at. as a small-business owner, it makes a big difference. you have this ad, was what

happened. to you think that these ads will be ready? >> that is the thing. you will make sure. consultants and marketing experts come in and work with the small business. when you think about the size of this price, most small businesses are family-owned. this will not only impact that particular person but generational the kids, kids kids could be impacted by this. it is going to be surely a live changing experience. i looked at my story ten years ago. melissa: watched. >> i'm getting to pay for rent and change someone else's life by giving them the said. melissa: will you come back with the winner? i cannot wait. we will follow this all the way through. all right. next on "money," igc hamburger between ramen noodles and what do you get? move over. ramen noodle burgers are the next food craze.

the creator is here. especial tasting. it is all in searching. you can never have too much "money." no, you c't have one. we are saving them all. you will get this.

♪ melissa: when you think ramen noodles you're probably thinking of your daily dinner. my next guest created a brand new concept for rahman burger. genius. it's just hit the scene about a month ago. people are waiting in line for hours just to get their hands on one. of course, we have to try it out for ourselves. so the roman guru who created this ary burger is here.

thank you for coming on the show. what gives you this idea? >> i just was in love with rum and since i was a kid. melissa: inove with rahman. >> i even qu my job. melissa: i read that somewhere. it sort of rocks my world. you quit your job as a programmer to go steady for 67 years. so it's much less time. how do you study for four years? >> i just 110 and applied for a shot and did the job and worked my way up. try and learn all the secrets. melissa: what is the difference between this and the company room and that everybody in america thinks of? >> what i'd been using is actually really fresh ren noodles. they're made by either machine out by hand. they are not frozen, freeze

dried, incensed. melissa: it over here. what people cannot see is that we have everyone in the studios are standing up to the side getting ready to elbow each other to get near. we have a lot of it. tommy what it tastes like. is it good? >> very good two sacks -- melissa: these has been talking about it. how do you hold it together to make it a bunch? >> as a trade secret. melissa: and not going to tell me? >> i can't tell you. melissa: is it hard to do? >> everyone seems to want to know. melissa: how big of a business he think this could possibly be? he's had the folks are here. you see this demand. you don't have a stand-alone shop right now. >> only doing it on saturdays. and then a couple here and there. the plan is, i guess we wanted to the other brick and mortar and possibly open up shop in

brooklyn as well so that we can have a home base. melissa: so many trends word there is one thing. i walked by a store on my block that sells only croissant's, this, that. yowonder how long these people the same business. do you have another plan? >> oh, yes. different flavors. plus, my goal is to make good run in and introduce good rahman . from what said make ramen burgers as well as just kaynine. melissa: what else did you make? >> dessert options. everyone keeps comparing as. melissa: i'm going to wait until the commercial tv because i understand it's very messy. thank you for coming on. appreciate your time. up next, who made -- today. he is raking in $10 million. it will probably be gone before he knows it. you can never have too much

"money" for two months ramen. all right. that's it. ♪ we went out and asked people a simple question: how old is the oldest person you've known? we gave people a sticker and had them show us. we learned a lot of us have known someone who's lived well into their 90s. and that's a great thing. but even though we're living longer, one thing that hasn't changed much is the official retirement age. ♪ the question is how do you make sure you have the money you need to enjoy all of these years. ♪

♪ melissa: ono. their still fighting. you have to share. oh, boy. whether it is on wall street or main street, here is to make "money" today. this ceo of best buy some of about 20 percent of fissures in the company. he netted a cool $10 million. it turns out he's doing it all because of the cost of his divorce. meanwhile, losing "money" today, david einhorn, one of apple's biggest and most durable shareholders.

as fund giant failed to launch a lawsuit against apple over dividends. earlier this year he held onto his stake through all of it and maybe regretting that decision today. he probably -- apple's shares dived more than 5% on the day. one of its 2-investors. einhorn greenlight capitol owns about sonat million shares which means the loss to $64 million. making a record amount of money for boxing, floyd may whether jr., the size of his purse this saturday has been finalized. he will take home 41 and a half million dollars. he will reportedly take come up said $12 million for fighting the weather. roughly the clothes will be made at a hundred dollar bills. we will see. that's all we have for you today. i hope that you made money today. you will see right back tomorrow . "the willis report" is coming up next. ♪

>> warning, the following jokes are raunchy, risque, and for adults only. >> suzanne, you look great. i think i'll have your room sent up to mine. >> no one threw a better party, a better black tie, a-list, racy, raucous, hilarious party than the king of cool... >> dean martin. >> dean martin. >> deano. >> dean, you're a phenomenon. you look like cary grant and you smell like ed mcmahon. >> starvista entertainment and time life present the dean martin celebrity roasts. >> dean and i have been on more floors than johnson's wax.