or g to tosullivanlive.com. every week day 3:00 to 6:00 p.m. eastern time. wel have another great tv show for you right here next wee on fox business. >> hello, eveone. i'm dennis kneale than for gerri willis. what does it cost when you criticize president obama and his ecomic poly? the answer may b over $20 million. that is what someone is paying. we will explain. and facebook ceo demanding more privacy not for you, but for himself. you in the mntime arebout to lose more privacy on facebook. also tonht monica de part two, sexual harassment in the workplace is legal, but a judge rules it is okay in some cases involving interns. our legal team will tackle that issue. "the willis reportstarts right nnw. ♪

we found out today what can happen when you are a top nuno who openly bashes the obama admistration. it will cost a company. the legal costs in defending itself i a slew of federal investigations will total at least an astonishing $23 billion could go even higher. this for a bank that our government thought necessary to raise billions of taxpayer dollars to bailout. the bank's chairman and ceo jamie dimon has been one of the few bold enou to criticize the white ouse economic policy which has made him a target of sorts. with me now, former goldman vice-president who is now a scholar and a liberal think tank . and neil weinberg, itor-in-chief of american banker. to start this off of what you to look at something. we want to make a chart of the different ancies investigating

jpmorgan. there are so many we could not fit them all on the same screen. and lk at this next screen. five more. ten ancies. th does not evemention the fha or the my state investigations. now the "wall street journal" editoria page,ashington is leading j.p. morgan and may yet stirring up jamie dimon as a lesson inhat will happen to any banker who dares to disagree with his washington bosses. his storytelling needs conflict. vear with conflict. what do you thk of tt point of view, the idea thathis is really at some point a witch hunt. >> thank you for having me on. actually, i have the complete opposite view, as you might have guessed going into this. i think that the criticism and the fact that jamie don has been so out front in the resistance to the form of wall street's has really caused him to create a whole sense of defiance against regulators

which iseally what has happened. ifou look at the reports that were done on the london whale case, it is clear that heas created a corporate culture wherregulations are not to be followed by the letr and the spit of the law, but to be avoided. i think that is really wt has gone on and why they have gotten -- dennis: by the way, did not see the chart exactly, but there are several other countries. i don't think he -- dennis: and yet, you know, jpmorgan takes its own mey and loses $6 billi which is a pretty good lesson about risk. yet the government comes in on top of that advise them almost a billion dollars more. why fine a bank for losing its own money? what is that? >> obviously it should n be legal you should not be fined for losing money or taking rks >> in this case with the vernment is saying is that

jae dimon or his bank was not bein honest with the government. i can tellou, you asked if this is a witch hunt. i think it is half a witch hunt. clearly there are some people who don't like the fact that jamie mon has been speakg of, but we have also -- an american banker, some of the things that the government is going after. we were there in some cases first and i think that there is some fire or themoke is coming from. example, theere trying to collt from people were delinquent on credit cards. they did not have the records to go after these people. it was extremely dubious behavior to either sell this to collection agencies or have their entire infrastructure of lawyers around the country suing people when they did not have the goods. they have since shut that down d there in trouble. th is why the investigation is going on with the occ. dennis: in the entire meltdown jpmorgan was one of the good guys. they did not tra in synthetic ceos. a real and the governmt says were you pleased by a bear stearns n washington mutual

the. 70 percent of the offens, all the companies, we bought them because you asked us to. we're picking on them. >> go back and listen to what was said by the management at the time he was acquired. they were gid about the transaction. th brought to bear stearns for roughly the value of the proper on park avenu. dennis: my point that these were guys who did something right. we are singlg them out and are about to destroy them. >> trading up. they actually are profitable, more profitable than wall street expected, but for the legal costs. ey're in no danger of going down. my point here is tha ty actually benefited hugely from the bailout. all of these other banks.

not that they should- they should not be punished for things that went wrong. the part of the witch hunt is what you're saying because he was a hero during the financial crisis, came and. that was good. now he is getting slapped for during that. also bank of ameri bought countrywide which was voluntary. they paid about $50illion to sett problems. you cannot say. dennis: when a bank in the worst melt down since the great depression is up losing more money not in a meltdown but in the aftermath because of the federal investiggtion and penalties, isn't there something wrong with our sysm? >> the could be something wrong with the syste or jpmorgan. >> you have to also take into consideration, jpmorgan was bailout. dennis: they paid back every penny plusnterest. >> the best way to think of it that the whole system, whethe it was money market

funds or currency swaps, the whole system was about to melt down. so even though kaytoo did not miss -- jpmorgan did not necessary needed an infusion, they benefited from the system. >> by that logic we get bailed out to. dennis: we have seen meltdowns in the late 80's and in 2000. and in 2008. every time t government has to find a few culprits to make in the poster child and to kind of beat up on them so that we all get our moral lesson. what about aall street amnesty? what about a treat and reconciliation commission? let's stop all ts because i feel le we are bleeding the very banks that we had to bailt to save the system. >> the bigger problem is the way we are leang the banks. there is validity to some of the vernment investigation. t all, some. i also think that the regulation is going to strangles. >> t regulation is going to shrink kaytoo and some of --

jpmorgan and some of the other bas by forcing rectus business out of the banks. that is true. as a very good thing. i think that the f of the matter is we hav have -- we n't need a treat reconciliation committee. no one more than a fabulous vampire them a fabulous that has @%er bee really proseted. the fact of the matter is. dennis: there was not true criminal activity going o >> arehe government has said the situation was so bad and tenuous. >> one other thing that is going on here. you ha regulator the office of the control, the currency, fcc, played as fools during the financial crisis, didot see anything going on. dennis: now ty can be t ones in the system that no matter. what i worry auts that what we are really doing here is the willssification ofhe american banking system we are making so that they are too afraido take risk, not that

theyill lose money, but it will pay even more in fines. i am takinghe last word on that. thank you for being with us. appreciated. now we want to know what you guys think. here is our question. the government ought to destroy? log on to a gerriwillis.com and vote. we will share the results of the end of tonight show. and it seems washington d.c. is set to destroy itself. on day 11f the government set down president obama and house speaker talking on the phone. both sidesay that while there is no deal the chatas constructive. rich edson is at the capitol with the latest. >> well, talking in right now republicans in the house are waiting for a counter offer from thehite house. republicans last evening in le night negotiations presentethe white house with an offer. raise the debt ceiling, reopen the parts of the government that are clos and included spending cuts and mandary health care cuts as well.

house republicans say they're waiting foa response from the white house on all of this. rit n you have this sense in washington where their rhetoric has been gile down. folks in the house are letting the negotiators for congressional leaders and t3 white house talk this one out. there's a separate track goi on in t scent. a number of republicans floating their own plans looking for democrs toign on board which would close or open the governnt for another year or fund the govnment for another year raise the debt ceiling for short-term in the medical device tax and health care law. the number of proposals floating around that these white house house republin negotiations are ly the primary track right here. waiting to see. i have to tell you democrats and republicans have been stuck on issues of taxes, revenues, government spending for years w. there are some certain things that they ccn do within that where they sort of agree and will be willing to go. long-term debt deal right now over the next few days is certainly not going to happen.

>> some of the changes the republicans actually want to make our important straismus. this to a 3 percent tax on medical equipment makers is on th revenue folks are not on the profits that are left over. that s the revenue. i talked to the ceo of a medical equipment company as it basically they will live, entire profit growth, now, this started out as a fight about obamacare. it feels like it is notbout obamacare anymore. what you think? >> it depends upon who you ask because there still are all obamacare mponents the republicans are pushing for. republicans still want or are floating accordingo one congressman a 1-year delay in the individual mandate that makes or requires almt everyone to hav health insurance nextear. when you look at the senate proposal, we just discussed that the is that element of medical device tax which is something in a budget vote that does not rely have the force of law. as an esta in a vote. it did not become law, but it did send a signal that 79 or 80g

that tax. that should an easy way that can be easily thrown on to this. dennis: the democratic controlled senate. refusing to negotiate or make ce democric controlled senat previously said it was left that equipment tax. these guys will fightver anythi, even when they agree. >> and that is the thing. and so you have the white house message on this which has been you raise e debt ceiling. you find the government. and then we will negotiate. right now the white house is giving a little bit. when you have something like this thi state of massachusetts , lot of mical device companies. senator is oking out for their home sta interest, though they may be democrats, theyon't want to see the tax. you have that and some other northeastern states with the same typef thinking. you wrap all of these issues and might get to something. that is where everything is sort

of moving allver the place right now. it is tough to tell what ll be included. we look to that because it has been so popular in the senate. denniss one last fearless prediction. will there be an accord by sunday? >> no. dennis: nicely done okay. a lot more still to come, including wa toake your wor experience a littleetter. and nex if you're on facebook they will find you whether you like and not. why advertisers and perfect strangers o worse an ex lover may soon be able tt searc you out. ♪

dennis: add real-estate mogul ted the resonate far mark zucker byrd, paying $30 million to buy four houses suounding his own in palo out so, california. if you want to do a flyover. fuelling his shopping spree is a lust for pvacy after discovering the developer wants to buy one of those son and

flip it by using the facebook billionaire as the hook, h made the move buying the homes by leasing them back to their forerunners. when it comes to your privacy, he takes facebook in the opposite direction, getting rid a privacy featurehat lets users limit who can find them on the site. here to weigh and, adam levine, the chairn of identity test 911. thank you for being with us. first, tell us why. >> they are arguing that since there are so money back drs wheee people can fi you anyy , they can g facebook dot com / dennis kneale and get to you. so therefore having ts sort of omnibus feature about using search engines to get our timeline, you know,ithin facebo, it did not mn anything. dennis: a proction that was not doing muc anyway.

>>reatg a false sense of security. dennis: previously and was able to sp some crazy ex-girlfriend search, but now cannot. >>xcept for the fact that it is such a small percentage of people anyway. with facebook, a small percentage could still be millions of people. listen, we are facing a constant the erosion of privacy. there is no question. faceok has been leading the charge. he himself said tha you know, there has been a paradigm shift in the concept o privacy. at this point there isn't any. playing so much information out there. dennis: is a ridiculous of us in the privacy prut's even make an issue of it given that have much privacy anyone should eect when they go on and s come here is the college, my religion, what ihink is it a misnomer? should we never have expected any privacy? >> peoe have a certain concept of what they want to see in %-other people and being able to limit those people

facebook argues that depending upon the items and where the are that you can limit to friends, frids of friends, acquaintances, the solar system, you know, whenever you want to do in terms of how public and expose you wish to be, but i think that in this -- first of all,e're living in a world now where i think we have generation i, generation invincible. people think they can say anything, do anything, and they're bulletproof. and they are not. there e too many people what your information. dennis: if it is not careful it will be on the wrong side of this trade. think about this. the american people are getting increasingly concerned aut just how much about them is avaible. california state legislature passing any laws aid at kids still have the right for the state forces website stick give kids a chance to take dowown comments. i was e-mailing the ceo of an outfit. they he temporary pne numbers or you can sign up and get rid of it in a day. in fact we have a segment coming

of later tonight micle. a bch of new apps. thii type of blitz disappeared. those. so isn't facebook kind of on the wrong side? shouldn't ty make it far better to let e know my privacy? i have no idea how to do my settings and feel like the company is making difficult. >> they claim they want to make it to the point where you can decide when you do something to you want to see it. it changes. it is a mystery. every day is a new adventure. and that is a great concern. they are ultimately going to end up on the wrong se. >> , but the news service that is more exclusive andore ruling out and as a lot more blockk and obstacles to others being able to comin and see everhing. should thetake this job back and turn it io a profit center? >> absolely. great article. the main announcement.

new program. $20 a picture you could make the information disappeared. >> i think that is a great business plan. the old days the white pages in the form but, you were listed unle you pay the phone company extra to be enlisted. maybe that model. thank you for being with us. and facebook is by far the world's largest social media site with nearly a billion visitors every month. issues of privacyre certain to de's out there.y for the other the most popular social media sites besides facebook makep to arrest of five. number fiie,oogle plus, a fast-growing netwo th number seems to beoing on the up as oppos semaphore, the late my space this 10-year-old network has been one of the first to launch the social media crazed b is mostly a music sharing site. interest, the photos sharing site that's more than 85 million monthly user's been up items

that they like. number two, linkedin, 102 million month users. the number one most popular social site is twitter. about a quarter of a million monthly user's, a quarter of a million has to be wrong. must be a quaer of a billion. let's hope i is better than the fabook ipo. we left out tumbler which has hundreds of millions. to grant. you get the point. later in the show, our legal panel debateshether unpaid interns are protected under the lawhen it comes to sexual harassment. next, we answer the question w do youo that? we will tell you the best ways to get along with churcht work. even if you guys seem to have nothing in common. ♪ gg@a@a@q@g s s????ñj

dennis: are difficult co-workers making a tiny office harder than it should be?

♪ dennis: class in with your co-workers. we have all had to go through it. working with jerks that can turn your job into a personal hell. and alwayeasy to deal with ceus can be quite an uncomfortable sittion. here it with experts dece on how to hane it, and our best communicions expert. thank you for being with us. coming communication errors that lead to jerky confrontation. lack ospecificity in what you say, lack of respect for rebuttals, lack of focus undesirable behaviors and lack

of immediacy. as second chart, a lot of wt happens iss better communication is needed. >> a lot of misunderstaings, misperceptions. the first one at the top is lack of specificity. and the easiest way to describe this is the phrase as soon as possible. what does that mean? dennis: almost nothing. >> it is one of the most common phrases and work places today. you say that to me and i think you mean, you know, next tuesday on my schedule. but you wanted by 7:00 tonight. dennis: something about posture. and this is your translation for some people are just a jerk. lack of appropriate tone and body language. sarcasm, raising your voice is somebody when you're upset. dennis: can't get just the being in panic.

dennis: are we bng a little precious few back the fact is people going to let fact -- /. >> poor customer service. final like you as a co-worker in need you to get something f one of my customers and he will back, that impacts customer service. if i have a good attitude and i amn a better work environment is causes turnover. and going to turn over and get of there. dennis: trust. >> trust is the fndation of everything. - final trustee of my best interests at heart are you will follow through on last year due, not a contest to do anything. dennis: how important is the art of apology in dealing with co-workers? >> it is huge, with the apology has to be sincere and we have to believe in it. if we don't address taiwan believe the apology rather. dennis:he solutions to this co-worker conflict.

>> we have to teach people how to communicate to influence i a positive w. how to confront iues directly, probably, but also respectfully. denn: just be noto much of a a reang to aoint society because i work with younger co-workers. this wil with an all. suddenly they are so does respected feeling like, oh, my gosh. i'm just trying to get the best work. are people too sensitive? >> yes. there is balanced. there is pendulum that we have to walk. absolutely, people can be seitive. ellis self-esteem and our society which is an epidemic. and so -- dennis: close of this team? was a it is the opposit. a bunch of people who are way too arrogant to have never received anything. >> that is all interrelated. @%u're absolutrit. dennis: that is amassed they put on. >> just like bullying. bullying is -- dennis: based on insecurity.

aubrey this is driven by insecurity. i fear failure and work a lot harder. >> and that is where the balances. some of us put it toward good use and bowserehavior. othersse negate ways to get . dennis: overall apologies are important. be nicer, watch your town, once the body language. >> and be more specific and as for what you want. ddnnis: i like this idea. that was my new year's resolution. i willtart asking more people for what i so far they keep saying no. thank you for being with us tonight. coming up, and mourning for all of you bond investors. and an unpaid iern sues the compa that she volunteered for claiming sexual harassment, but is it legal? is it legal? our panel of experts wil

the training, it all comes down to this. to ba winning team, you have to work like a winning team. we have a job to do out here tod. some people think it's about muscle, but it's really about heart, a lot of heart. my team depends on me. and my team? is 50,000 stng.

♪ hey! looks like a lot of wo's going into this. ♪ hey! ♪ hey! all right. let's go. hawkins: this is what it feels like to be part of a team. kimbrel: a winning team. the action team. are you in? action team! action team! get in on the action at actionteam.org. are you in? ♪ dennis: smart tool -- here yes, gerri willis. dennis: is working for company free of chae in the mini your employer has the right to harass

you? the controversial ruling made by a federal judge in new york last week is spaaking some outged. judge ruled that unpaid interns and a protected. the human rights law. they cannot sue there employers again sexually aroused. should an unpaidntern is protected. joining us with our legal panel, an employment lawyer. and a fox news legal analyst. you know, any time we come up with an intern and harass and sexy wind up thinkingbout all bunc of things in recent american history. where do you guys fall on this? >> legally as reprehensible as mr, horrible case whe a woman was groped and promised a job and after she disappeared in the grand hotel she lost the job so it was horrible. legally the judge got a right because she is not an employee. that can be changed to bar rig now employees are not protected ke that.

>> i think the judge got it wrong. under wage and hour laws, there have been cases of interns you were providing a benefit to the employer and therefore should be paid. >> but was not being paid. >> but they were able to ultimately be paid because there were benefitin the employee. she was not going out and is making coffee and cocktails. she was doing real work. dennis: you would have ge about i in a difrent way and saying she is a defect to hourly emplee. >> that is correct. however, if you just want to have a law that says straight up inn should be paidhat is a great idea. dennis: you will have a lot because lot of people won't hire them. that is the beauty of unpaid interns. you bring them in and do not pay them. dennis: they don't have to worry about the same litigation possibilities the budget with full-time employees. >> thais exactly what the court isaying.

i think that is wrong from a moral standpoint. from a legal standpoint aware that the law is now, that is correct. >> first of all, s is still haven assault and battery civil suit. under criminal charges again keating wrote. second of all, the employer, says he is high on the totem pole could turn the employee th his actions and be invved in nligenceupervision ces. [inaudible conversations] >> my point was that if you are high enough in the pecking order your actions could bind the employer. >> tol the employer liable. >> yes. right. and interestingly enough tissue an employee and this happed a work the employer could have a defenswhich is that it should be dealt with by workers' compensation she is not an emmloyee she could have a case like that. >>o she might be better off.

>> and employ you. >> that's right. >> a workerhat comes invery day. they don't count as an employee. >> the most famous and turn. and there we unpaid. only the unpaid interns were there. she was the one that brought the pizza immolated night. >> that is all other story. as iaid before, if you are doingoffee, bringing me coffee , helling babysit for the boss's daughter, that is not a benefit to the employer. dennis: a quick footnote question. this year and woman, a 42 or 23, she did go to the boss is the tower room. if this were a full-time employeef the company payroll, sexual harassment case,ould it be a mitigating factor that she had willingly got to?

>> you cannotlame. would be wng >> she was afraid that if she did not go. >> itame down to quit pro quo. you come to the tell, do what i wanted to do the family get this job. she said no. does not her fault. >> soon after s did not get the job? >> exactly right. she sued a she did not get the job. she was promised a job and did not gett. dennis: if she had done the job she might not have sued. >> if she got the job surely would not have sued because you'd be happy she had the job. dennis: of fiveuing for asman and got the job doesn't that mean if i want to take the job must not think thearassmen is that bad? >> you can look at it that way.@ that part of the case, she was not hired because she complained about it.

the point is if h he h taken the job she would not be suing harassment. you can still sue your employer. happens every day the week. someone is there, and happy, denied a promotion, denied a od position and soup. >> it would not have happenedf she got the job. dennis: the is something -- i know. we are just going to leave it right there. thank you for being with u a wonderful job matching the dress to the eye. professional consulting. >> my time. >> all right. thanks a lot. when we come back a look at how you can possome the onle and have disappeared. and with big-name companies dropping in treasury, is this a sign of where the bond market is headed? will we looking out f you and your gerriwillis.com next. ♪ @a

♪ dennis: this function is alive and well in washington d.c. toght. you need that. no one has come up wiih e deal to reopen the federal government , hammer out a sensible spendinplan are deal with the debt. the only thing they seem to agree on is toeep on talking. meanwhile the rest of us in the whole economy was held hostage by the situation. en will all of this come and have an impact on your money? president and founder of into a portfoo straeies and author of the buck he correctly forecast t real eate collapse in 2006. how doest relate? >> your living in the twilight @%ne. if they do not raise the debt ceiling in washington d.c. and we have a balance was a minute

however, if we raise the debt ceiling in extending credit card lit that is the correct thing to do and fiscally irresponsible. i haveo idea what is going on. dennis:ha is the right approach? split that they befores. >> the right aach is to keep the amount of the deficit growth under the incase in nominal gdp. we will somehow somed be able to bail out the debt. dennis: rewind that. the way to do it is? >> if that percentage issgrowing and les quick rate than the increase in nominal gdp, tt

debt as a percentage of gdp would be falling. the best tng we can possibly the biggest the already hav 17 trillion inebt and consistently pass the entitlement program. now we have a premium support for 20 million individuals who cannot afford healt insurance. i wonder where the money will come for these people over two and half trillion. when we going tooplacate our creditors and let them know that the united tates government will never defaults. the only way that we caa d that is to bring down our deficits.

i cut the deficit in half since i took office. >> the deficit in 2007 was under and 60 billion. because it went to one-half trillion. at a single year. >> i am not blaming the obama. dennis: i am. >> i am blaming w-2. obamacare into a receson and depression. it is not alwa fall. you cannot sit there and say happy days are here again. look at us. we are fiscal conservatives. the deficit is $750 billion. dennis: we are hap about it. >> a un have to worrybout anything. the ficit is upremendously from mary was. dennis:id not read a recent headline coming 8% of government spending is on automatic pilot.

we let people being ctegorized unabomber's. we have to do something about entitlement programs. we don't need to add to entitlement programs. we need to fix the ones you alread have. you need to spend less i'm social security, but now we're supposed to believe that this gridlock in d.c. is going to ad to a grand bargain. am i supposed to believe the democrats are going to dismant social security in all of these retirement programs? , supposed to believe they will embrace on mass use tax increases onealthy? it is not going to happen. the best thing is a small deal

witht ll save face. they reduce the tax. we cannot go home and celebrate e fact that we are careening toward insolvency. dennis: until the next crisis. we have to wrap. just checking. wh you said that the tea party is america's answer our home. you were not being sarcastic or ironic. you mean t that. >> i love the tea party. as i've country's best hope. >> they want to balance the budget, strengthen the currency. now you are treated, these people i know, lik i said. dennis: they have been characterid as such aost by our own president

one last note, oneeason that we have not yet had a crisis, every year w have been paying about $360 million in interest costs. basically identical to what it was ten years ago when the debt was malt to the far smaller. thank you. we have to go. thank you. appreciateour time. >> thank you. dennis: that was a lot of time. you got plenty. >> let's go ather segment dennis: take care. still to come, we will look into the newes trend in social media. the tempura web, when information disappears after only seconds.

dennis: coming up a socia media is here to stay, but do your messages have toçks

♪ dennis:n the internet the rule of thumb is that nothing ever disappears. but new applications are trying to do just that marries the messages, photos and seconds, and a hot trendn social media. withore on this, a principal in u.s. aisoryovation leader with the w.c. price waterhouse coopers. maybe that is what they are funding as. thank u for joining us tonight. a nice new airaft. usually when i see this guy he is absent minded professoit needs a haircut. expln this, the temporal web. >> the idea that people don't always want everything out there for the rest of their lives.

when the internet for started out the deal was everyone to have everything woull be added together. aftethat happened people started to realize there were some things they wld like to take off. on the dimension of privacy about time the control which where we are startg to see it happen. dennis was run through a few examples. you have a show. snap chat lets you send photos with a catch. >> absolutely. founding with the idea that you could take a picture of video and send it to a friend and again last anywhere from one to ten seconds and it is gone. not abouteing upon the web for ever, but viewed by an individual and then not there anymore. dennis: this message will selfestruct. >> exactly. the thing is that a lot of people say that this generation does not care about pvacy. they do. they're dimension of privacy is different. they want to get temporary in the new world which he goes

privacin control because privacy. dennis: interesting. the problem, let's see sign up for a phone number that you use for a day, anour, we, and then you burn eight and eliminated. this guy was saying to me that basically one thing is that people want to have authentic of versace's with each other, free expression. the second thing he says is that the more mile we get, the more advertising marketers come aft you and try to gets to you the molly actually seek protection in inflation away from it. >> i could not agree more. you jeardy for people to be able to control the environment. you think about what will get measured and managed. you take a look ssomething like the self driving a car. an unbelievable amountf informational, whether it's coming from the bill will orality or tesla. we will see more and more measurement. i totally agree. his pduct is a very interesting product. let's say you happen to have an advertisement out there, a date

site. the id of being ableo control and that it be temporary. that is the new privacy. >> anonymity. the weekend to you. >> good talko you. dennis: sho and sweetut intelligence. that guy is quite brilliant. we will b right backith the answer to our question of t day. is the goverent ought to destroy j.p.

the $19 llion, jpmorgan has a rare lss in the third quarter. is the government out to destroy the big banks. we azlan gerrillis.com. that is ever tonight "wiis

report" have a great weekend. we will see later. you're the best. have hot coco tonight. e you on monday. the fit washington is just plain ugly. but will a settlemt between the democrats aad the republicans kick the disagreemes down the road? will it change anything? we're talki is the fight something destructive or something we really need? right here right now. >> from the fox business headquarters in new york city "the tom sullivan show." here's your host, tom sullivan. >> here's what i have at the top of the stack. we know the atmosphere in washgton has drawn more poisonous over the years and the respect for our lawmakersas drped as a result. but has our government grown too big and too powerful? is it time to finally have a shdown over what we want our government t