thank ou for being here. really a of created a big it's not what got my attention. at it w what really a of said affiliate that.t. but why we keep choosing they we same kind of guys forhe same president. think about it. senators, governors, politicians to the exclusion of other. othr. why not venture outside that kind of political petri dish. outside the capitol to look at folks who are prettyow, i li i don't know with cap to

the. the whi we should widen the job searchlo for who sits in the white house for and those who can sit in the white house.be maybe oprah. why not a ticket of bill gatesp anda opera k of people outside te obvious? not as if we could do wore. take look around. we already are. tonightgoing long with the maverick temporary shored and patience is running thin. he wants to shake up the nation once again. it's a pleasure to have you. thank you for coming. >> thank you. neil: i love the idea. i think it's brilliant. i don't know why it suld e such a surprising idea. >> i don't know why either. because so many people are rned off the two parties. half the people don't bother going to the presidential election. there's a lot of cynicism. it leaves the washington bubble

unpretushed. we need to injection new idea, new background, new agenda. and let's face it in, the next couple o years it's going take people of a lot of money. megabillionaires or billionaires to get on the ballot to basically though the new idea based on the experiencebefore the american people to give them more voices nnoys voices. we have the whole list of the 120, i proposed on the website nadeer.com. you threw ted gates in there and steve -- stevcase andgo on to take a look at the others. your argument by and large, if they know something abou cceeding and money then maybe they're just the folks to deal with washington and money. >> yeah. the three criteria do these multibillionaires have enlightened background, have they given money to charity, or

groups like doctors without borders. have they taken a stand on a controversial issue. it doesn't mean i agree with them or digree. the main thing to use the great first amendment of free speech to blow open the tight two-parterre any is unworthy of the american people. neil: en you ran for president. a lot of people said we don't think we should be running for president. why shouldn't he run for prident? he's a smart guy. you might not agree with the politics. why excluding it. he's not a senator or congressman. there's a lot. when y talk about the billionaires and those wh have a lot maybe taken a stb at politics or the white house. i'm reminding what you said about romney when he was running for president. you might remember this. >> he should be called myth rouletette romney. >> that's another good one.

>> so far to the right of reagan. so for a to the righ nixon. and so are the republicans in congress. we're dealg with a rogue republican party. neil: your criticism of omney wasn't that what he was. too rich on the right. you're not you say want only left-leaning billionaire. >> i want a competitiv democrat like a competitive economy. that's what we want. if we're serious about it. we'll y the country has a lot of problem it is doesn't deserve. a lot of solutions on the shelf that doesn't apply in one area after another. we'r at gidlock. >> indian what you're saying. but you'repolitically choosing who like. we shw the coke brothers but you saidarlier you were opening expanding the petri dish but only t billionaires you like.

>> i disagree with a lot of bill gates. he's on the list. >> miller. i want to say selection. there are penty others. the main thing is to break up the close-door in washington. you have everything scripted like a coronation for hillary clinton. no competition. it's crazy. >> what do you think of hillary clinton would youback or fed up with the two-party syste we don't need another eight years with the clintons. we need fresh voices, fcused on results. >> including omeone open to raising can taxes cutting taxes. what would ralph wat to see? >> all opinions in the area. let them compete. thing off the table. i put 18 areas on people's minds that were taken off the table in 2008. and still have them on the website.

these are issues on people's minds. they were taken off the table -- >> you're dead right about that. both parties drop theball on the big issue. let me ask you about what i hear from business guys on left and the rit about why they don't try politics. they said it is not worth the media scrutiny or tearing down -- you experience that for yourself running for president. in the public spotlight. you are doing what you do. i can understand why the hell with it. >> most of them will. michael could buy the white house. it's smaller than his house. >> that's true. they don't have to dial for dollars.

they don't to be ad hoc to commercial interest. they run for the conscience. d most of them are pretty narcissistic. and don't care. all you need is a few enlightened ones. i call it -- we always take from the same pool. the same people. and expect different results. really a of. a pleasure. be well this weekend. >> thank you. when did it know it? forget about the politians suddenly now demanding answers. i wan you to meet dad whose daughter is dead and wants to daughter is dead and wants to as in t new new york,

we don't back down. daughter is dead and wants to as we only know one direction: up so we'rep early. up late. thinng up game-changing ideas, like this: dozens of tax free zones across new york state. move here. expand here. or start a new businessere... and pay no taxes for 10 years. with new jobs, new opportunities and a new tax free plan. there's only one way for your business to go. up. find out if your busins can qualify at start-upny.com but with less ergy, moodiness, i had to do something. i saw mdoctor. a blood test showed it wasess, low testosterone, not age.. we talked about axiron the onlynderarm low t treaent hat can restore t vels to normal in about two weeks in most men. axiroor men with prostatewomen or aor breast cancer.n 18 women, especlly those who are or who may become pregnant, and children should avoidt where axirons applied as unexpected signs of puberty in children or changes in body hair or incased acne in women may occur.

report these symptoms to your doctor. tell your doctorbout all medical conditions and medications. serious side effects could include increased sk of prostate cancer, worsening prostate symptoms, decreased spm count, ankle, feet or body swelling, worsening prostate symptoms, enlarged or painful breasts, problems brehing while sleeng and blood clots in the legs. coon side effects include skin redness or irritation where applied,i, coon side effects include skin redness headache, diarrhea, voming, and increase in psa. ask your doctor about axiron.

serious ignition switch problems in some carsn the better part of the decade and said nothing for the did nothing. this much is not. 13 people are dead and more than a million vehicles have been recalled thus far as a result of a malfunction that effective shut down vehicle safety systems including air bags. to a man who knows too well.

ken. his daughter, brooke, was killed in a crash linked to the ignition switch defect back in 2010. he and his lawyer lance cooper are suing gm ad hope to get answers now. both gentlemen join me from atlanta. my condolence,en, to your loss. i cannot imagine as it gos against the grindof life. our children are supposed to bury us. not the other way around. t was this defect the reason your daughter die? undoubtedly. it was found even beforethe 2005 model that my daughter bought. for some reason they decided not to disclose the matter, and she bought a -- a new model in 2005, and in 2010

the ignition cut off on her. she had an accident, which killed her. neil: i don't want to reliveethe horrible history. if you'llic dulling me. the ignition cuts off. it means the engine effectively cuts off. it means also the air bag cannot be released because the safety system goes down. it went she went head on in to someone and that's what happened; ght? >> unfortunately, went across two lane of traffic, t-boned by another car, she lost braking, all steerg and went down t a ditch full of war after that. i understand from the doctor a the hospital that her neck was broken in the side crash.

in the 13 people gm disclosed she wasn't included because i was no a head-on collision. that's what i was going to raise with your attorney. they are distinguished between those involved and the head-on crash and those not. as in ken's daughters. but '02 saying that if you include off such events the are i count of those killed goes up presip usely. >> absolutely. >> explain, lance, what your track will be. >> well, gm is actually settled the claim. we continue to pursue our investigation to make sure that nitsa pursue their investigatn to get what gm knew and when. if th didn't rely it and that was the initial argument at the time that even government didn't know because the company sharing

this. where does it put the investigation. they had a duty to disclose it within five days. they should have disclosed it in 2005 when the cief programming engineer who had a similar incident -- they knew about th defect. they deermined the ignition swch was defective in for of 2005. they never should have put the car on the road and should have informed them of the problem and fixed it. we wouldn't be here today. as ken said there arelikely more numerous fatalities. they have been had included brooke's accident. >> i talked to one analyst yesterday ho said it is easy to make it look obvious after the fact there are reports or sporadic the study show problem in the this case the ignition situation and others.

do you believe tey knew that? >> no, i don't believe it. i believe they already had indications if there were probmsith the switch before that. and di't indicate that. we'll wah where it goes. lance, as well. ank you, both, for coming. thank k you. >> thank you, neil. >> all right. to former transportationsector how a company could literally keep it under the hood for so long. secretary, it in't automatic lividded to government; right? the company could keep this to itself or is there procedure? wh is the procedure? %-ways that nitsa the safetywo organization at d.o.t. that looks in to these matters th

the afety organization when i was there where we called toyota and made sure their cars ere safe. we did it with gm when it came to the volt and the batteries were catching fire. we required them to fix it. so people can complain to nits they can file a complaint onne. or the car company has to disclose it. those are the only two ways. neil: do we know, secretary, whether gm had relayed it or people were working through to get the word back to gm to get the word back. was it -- >> wll, everything i read didn't look like hey knew about it. whh means they didn't discle it. nobody complained abt it. sometimes they read about them and opens an investigation. neil: how does it start, secretary. let say there are a series of incidents or accidents short of the people involved or their loved ones getting in touch of

them or their lawyer. that's about the only way they're going find out if the company isn't saying anything right? >> that's right. somebody has to file a colaint. somebody has to go online. somebody has to called line and say my car is not working right. my ignition is not working properly. how does the toyota stuff get to you? >> it really came as a result of the accident in san diego were three people were killed. and that's when we opened the instigation. neil: and that we had tape and that made it more powerful. >> that's right. we did a second inestigation where they didn't disclose infoation. we fined them again. it ce through a complaint that was filed by individual citizens. >> do you think it's a cynical question, forgive me. given what gm was dealing with some year back with the buyout and the rescue, that maybe if we

would have gotten the rescue. >> i think when i look back on the four and a half years i was secretary.ings very seriously. people criticizedus for, you know, trying to take on tow you that or trying to, you know, impinge toyota's reputation. but -- >> going to toyota and maybe going soft. i know, the vote. i remember that very well. maybe there was a sort of standoffish deal with gm because there s a heap of problems already. >> not at all. we went after chrysler when they had the gas tank on the jeep improperly u installed ith went after gm when the volt's batteries were catching fire.

[inaudible conversations] let me ask your own thoughts how it can take a ten years to fess up. >> unprofessionalism. something is not right. very deep, very deep. find out what happened. and then make people pay monetarily and otherwise. follow the law. follow the information. this will be investigated for thoroughly. >> the woman who rn gm ran the division that oversaw this car and series of cars. if there is a link she bought something. should she go? >> we'll that leave up see what the investigation says and look there's a bardofdirectors that runs gm. one priority for all car

companies. and nobody wans the reputation tarnished. and so let's see where the investigation gos. >> secretary, thank you. good sighing you again. >> thank you, neil. coming up. how the next world war could, couud be fight without firing a shot. we might be out of b

i must begin my journey, which will cause me to miss the end of the game. the x1 entertainment operating system lets your watch live tv anywhere. can i watch it in butterfly valley? sure. can i watch it in glimmering lake? yep. here, too. what about the dark castle? you call that defense?! come on! [ female announcer ] watch live tv anywhere. the x1 entertainment operating system, only from xfinity. i don't want to pay anymore. at the end of the show i'm answing a lot of your questions and concerns. you can ask me what is in the deal. by e-mailing.

keep it to a minimum. some get a little too personal. the camera adds 50 pounds. [laughter] meanwhile, new chair janet yellen a breath of fresh air. >> federal reserve simply doesn't have authority to supervisor or regulate bitcoin. neil: that's right. but unusual will someone in washington saying not our job that the fed doesn't have the authority which is making you a lot of you think -- have the authority to step in and regulate everything els 90% of what hey regulate. another from ben who write it was a hint,int to obama to sign an executive order to give them the authority to regulate bitcoin. we don't kno for sure. but we know a lot of you are green.

we call it -- [inaudible] there's a limit to what i can do. look what the fed does. they are supposed to regulate banks and regulate the amount of money and circulation. they did a lousy job with the banks in 2008. in trm of regulating the amount of -- it's great for wall street. artificially l interest rates. main streeters haven't done so well particularly in the job situation and folks like me saving their money aren't willing to gamble as much. you look very good. >> 88 years old. >> 84. 84. >> marvelous. >> you know what i'm saying. what they do regulate.

they seem to regulate poorly. why give bitcoin? >> right. you don't want to add to the responsibility. more government rules gone wrong. the federal holding calling the lunch program for schools disassous. find o a 150 schools are saying kids are going hungry because the small portions. that's one way to fight obesity. make them not eat so they starve. it's gettingyou a lot of you mad. from roland who writes my children can't stand the cafeteria food. the way it tastes anymore. we pack our own launches now. another frm adam who writes maybe the lids could tax kids for not buying something they don't want. finally, this from beth 73. this is what happened in a tweet that's what they do. they just put a code. anywayor one the lunches are more expenve. two the food is gross. long no longer have to deal with it.

hash tash thankful. >> they were meant to be controlled by the local communits. control by the mothers and fathers. when the feds came in saying first the teachers got unionized then feds came in with department of education. it sounds great. what it means is the rules start coming from washington not the local community. concerning school aids. i used to ab teacher. i hated deal with the school bods. they were slave of the federal government international airported to get the money coming from thfed. they had to do with the feds told them. even if it didn't work. whether involved in teaching aids or now the -- i don't want to -- i don't know but something is happening. they are -- >> look. okay indian obesity. i don't want them saying you're against it. i understand it's a problem. being too thin is alsoa problem. >> tell me about it. [laughter] >> if yoo don't like what you're

mandated to eat what you have to rules. >> because they're not eating it. [inaudible conversations] some schools have actually mandated they bring in chips so they get -- [inaudible] >> that's my place. >> it's ridiculous. >> ring ding junior high. >> local communities control the tuation better than the feds. >> well, said, my friend. a thin, fit, 88-year-old david. >> 88. [laughter] forget whether utting so -- preworld war ii level is good for the next. what if i told you we're sitting up for a far more ominous one. the next war. a cyber war. a war for which we're outmanned, outspent, and get a load of this. out of time. so our business can be on at&t's network for $175 a month?

yup. all 5 of you for $175. our clients need a lot of attention. there's unlimited talk and text. we're working deals all day. u get 10 gigabytes of data to share. what about expansion potential? add a line, anytime, for $15 a month. low dues, great terms. let's close! new at&t mobile share value plans our best value plans ever for business.

>> attacks growing. attacks against wall street and around the wor hit disruptive attacks. @e should protect the networks than we have them protected today. we have to be prepared for that as a nation. neil: scary stuff. that is the head of u.s. cyber command saying it is notf an attack is coming it is when and when it comes we won't be ready. this during the time our defense budget is being cut to preworld war ii levels. at least the troop commitment. homeland security expert thinks the terrorism is no longer our biggest immediate threat. that cyber warfare is. ey are joined at the sam dangerous hip? >> yes, they are. connection bween the cyberattack and fiscal attack. you shut out the lights and bring the attack to the streets of america. neil: but what could, help me here. what is considered cyber?

what is cyber area? >> anythinghat that uses computerize system. refer to scata, supvisory control and data access. we control all the big things from power plants to dams, spillways, through the use of a computer. we send out a radio signal and tell them what to do. the concern of course you get into these operating systems and you manipulate them in way thaw either mask what's going on, so in other words, a take fills up supposed to let out bad material before it get as certain lev. you have a gauge, the gauge gets taken off-line. neil: don't we, starting to -- you always talk about malware type of devices some wear. don't we have the equivalent of that to ward off this. >> believe i or not the, what we say, benjamin netanyahu, the former israeli prime minister, and davos, switzerland, at economic conference called

cybersecurity the arms race without end. that is because cybersecurity is not a destination. it is a journey. it is evolution. neil: what do the bad guys want to do, michael? >> what they have been doing, they steal, eilation of data. they take money. they take, intellectual capital. not only from terrorists this is nation states. these are criminals. so they're stealing things. they're implanting capabilities so they come back in, what they call back doors tron horses. things lie in wait until a computerized system until they receive a instruction, now mov forward, execute this order. they're also taking information as you type. something known as key logging. you put a malware program on the syst downloads keystrokes, information u're putting out, e-mails. the things that you send to different people. they're snooping, they're stealing a potentially they're manipulating. and it is that last piece that

is alway the intersection between cybersecurity and physical security. neil: i always worries what happened in the san jose, utility. shutting down our grid, is that the ultimate form of cyber terror? >> i think there is a lot of ways, if we shut down wall street, and if we took out the financial markets -- neil: even disrupting for a few days, couple thousand points. >> big thing also, how much of our economy is predicated upon onli transactions? neil: th's right. >> target. apple revealed there was vulnerability in their operating systems. neil: you think these are setting up worse things? >> i think they are setting up and erode people's confidence how they work in the cyber economy. that could have major impacts for the united states. neil: impacts we're not ready for? >> no. working with a guy from the chief counsel of homeland security committee in the house, we talk about how we need a safe harbor for information-sharing how we're bng attacked in addition to. who we could never get a bil

done in the u.s. congress. they could never move it forward. that is lack of leadership. lack of vision. neil: or lack of knowledge. >> or lack of knowledge. neil: michael, thank you very, very much. >> my pleasure. neil: meantime have you seen stocks lately? well the s&p hitting all-time highs. so why are shoppers hiding away their wallets? stocksre running up. consumers are running scared. that can't go on. mine was earned in korea in 1953. afghanistan, in 2009. [ male announcer ] once it's earned, usaa auto insurance is often handed down from generation to generation. because it offers a superior level of protecon. and because usaa'commitment to serve current and former military members andheir families is without equal. begin your legacy. get an auto insurance quote. usaa. we know what it means to serve. coach calls her a team player.

she's kind of special. she makes the whole team better. he's the kind of player that puts the puck, horsehide, bullet. right whe it needs to be. coach calls it logistics. h's a great passer. dependable. a winning team has to have one. somebody you can count on. somebody like my dad. this is my dad. somebody like my mom. my grandfather. i'm very pround of him. her. them. predibut, manufacturings a prettyin the united statesdo. means advanced technology. we learned that technology allows uto be craft oriented. no one's losingheir job. there's no beer robot that has suddenly chased them out. the technology is tually creating new jobs. siemens designed and built the right tools and resources to get the job done.

neil: well for some of you it is going to be a great weekend after all thanks to us. earlier this week judge napolitano was on this very show saying that new york city's ban on bottomless brunches and unlimited drindeals is against the law. and now, and now, officials are saying boozing brunches are exempt, exempt from the ban. so, pop the champagne, have a mimosa. not on us, for us. give you address and details.

you're welcome america. anyway, brutal winter, even more brutal sales. a new report showing retail sales posted their first profi drop as a group since the recession. model sporting goods ceo mitch mode dell is getting frozen out because it is frozen where a lot of his stores are. mitch, in the northeast, another storm that is supposedly going to hit. people all they have to do is hear about that and they don't go out, right? >> absolutely. all we need is another blizzard on sunday, monday. you know what? neil: the mayor will dig us all out. what happened tohe snowplows? did he hide them. >> i think he is hiding them somewhere. neil: but it does impact yu? >> no questn. every retailer is sold out of boots and outerwear. the good news is sold out the winter goods neil: what about sweatshirts. >> the good news we're out of sweats but everyone sitting on

spring goods when it is 10 degrees. neil: you were telling me when weather warmed up a little bit and they were out there. >> last weekend in the 50s, it was the fit sn of life probably in about 30 days. people were shopping, all areas of the store. neil: do you think it's a all weather, mitch? reason why i ask, there is disconnect going on, i'mying together housing, all these banks laying off people in their mortgage businesses. housing is swing a little bit. surge in home pces is slowing a little bit. not a lot. not crisis levels. i'm connecting all of those dots and sayings well, maybe we're in for a little hit? >> untl the weather turns warm, hopefully in the next two weeks you will see, when retailers do well, everyone does well. >> is that so? >> yeah. usually like one retailer does well, everyone does poorly. when it comes to businesses really contingent on with, people buy for need. i don't think it is just the weather situation. i don't know if it is oil

prices, i don't know if it is food prices. i don't know if it is the sentiment of the people that, they feel like their job might be at stake, what is goin on in washington. possibly raising taxes in the city. neil: health ca. >> health care. it is like, there es an uncertainty among consumers that @e'll know soor than later if it is that or if it is weather. neil: sells sports paraphernalia, when the baseball season cops, even when snowing outside, when iear that spring trainings going on and first game of the baseball season it could be five et of snow out there, but i'm already convinced spring ihere. >> no question about it. when the yankees signed tanaka, it was unbelievable. when derek jeter announced retirement they came out of the woodrk. neil: is that so? derek jeter stuff in demand because it is final year? >> unbelievable. last year we didn't have a good

team in new york. this year onaper the team looks great but the facthey want to be part of you know, history and we saw what happened -- neil: they will have another disasterous year. >> absolutely. i know you're a boston fan. neil: no, i'm not. boston on paper looked good and didn't look good. every time they say on paper someone looks great you know. >> listen, like any other team, if the team stays healthy they have a good chance of battling it out. it will be definitely exciting. neil: this is the limit of my sports discussion because you know so far much more. i know the standings. that is it. >> you'r not bringing up jeremy lynn. neil: i won't go the you are you were stuck with a lo of that. >> i don't even want to say. neil mitch, knows the business very well. have you ever surfed the net, stumbled upon, i don't know, stuff like this? oh, i don't know, maybe this? let's say this? yeah, ladies. turns out you're the not only ones looking.

someone is look a you, baby.

neil: now you may want to throw away your webcam because, news that british spies intercepted millions of webcam images from yahoo! users. now many of them, sex alley explicit. that is alarming. yahoo! says they didn't really know anything about this or that it was going on. keith fitz-gerald, gary b. smith, says if tech companies like yahoo! can't protect privacy of their users we got big ol' problems. gary b., what do you think of this? >> there is difference, neil, between investing company and using company. i think you said it right up front i would throw away my

webcam. but on other hand, people are very stubborn in what they use, applications they e and things like that. what will happen people stop using webcam, but if they're big yahoo! users they still use yahoo! i would be scared away some portions of thepplication but not so much the stock. neil: what worries, keith to gary's point, we get used to, you don't have a webcam or built into monitor you don't think about it. i'm wondering if we get upset about th and forget about this? >> actually i think it is other way around, neil. i think we forget about it and upset we forgot about it an proof is right in our face of the time to really discuss all this 40 years ago when they first devoped this technology. the genie is so far out bottle from usage standpoint it is not even funny. going forward from an investment standpoint the real meat on the bone is edges. it i around security companies. around who can manipulate the data. it will not be big guys like yahoo! because they have lost control of it. >> even if they lost control of

it, there are very few guys do what the do, to the heft they do. gary b., might get a black eye or genuine surprise or feigning surprise but i don't see the hit being that severe that long, do you? >> totally agree. the best example is most recent one in target. people were outraged. people were going to stop shopping there. meanwhile, target i think i just looked is up 15% since the, since the end of january. so if you had bought when, you know, there is all the red flags and going out of business, they will lose all this you wouldld have made a pretty good penny. neil: do you think, keith, you went back, nicely put, forget the rage, whether you did forget we look a all of these high-tech companies as having the pential to make u very vulnerable but we deal, we just deal with it because we need them, what do you make of that? >> i think that's a very prescient statement, neil. we have tended to learn to live

with our worst nightmares because they become something much softer. they become dreams and hopes and aspirations. so at first we're terrified. we don't know what to make. human beings are wired agast and resistant to change. sooner or later when you come out of the caveou figure the say per tooth tiger isn't lurking and go get your dinner. neil: every night at my house. gary b., it doesn't make you question this entire group or for that matter technology stocks, right? some people say until the dust settles i avoid all of these guys. what do you say to that? >> well, you know for those ludites i suppose that will never like technology stocks like warren buffett but for the rest of us who c't avoid using google and twitter and look, if i knew tomorrow there was some huge bug in google, i would still, well, i still got to check the news. i ill got to read the tweets. i stillot to use normal applications. you can pick and choose between yahoo! and gooe and bing and

things like that. kind of like keith said, if you have your go-to thing you will be hungered down in the cave and think there is no sabre tooth tiger. neil: i strength it and the tiger analogy. finally time. you've all been waiting and all want to know -- >> what is the deal? (announcer) scottrade knows our clients trade and invest their own way. with scottrade's smart text, i can quickly understand my charts, and spend more timtrading. their quick trade bar lets my account follow me online so i can react in real-time. plus, myocal scottrade office is there to help. because they know i don't trade like everybody. i trade like me. i'm with scottrade. (announcer) ranked highest in investor satisfaction with self-directed services by j.d. power and associates. they're about 10 times softer and may have surface pores where bacteria can multiply. polident kills 99.99% of odor causing bacteria

and helps dissolve stains. that's why i recommend polident. [ male announcer ] cleaner, fresher, brighter every day.

iwe don't back down. we only know one direction: up so we're up early. up late. thinking up game-changing ideas, like this:

dozens of tax free zones across new york state. move here. expand here. or start a newbusiness. and pay no taxes for 10 years. with new jobs, new opportities and a w tax free plan. there's only one way for your business to go. up. find out if your business caalify at start-upny.com neil: this is quickly becoming the most popular segment ofhe show perhaps any show and what e call it guys? >> what's the deal, neil? neil: you can ask me anything you want, anything at all, email, tweet, text or talk. >> neil, what is your advice for the next year? neil: well my advice for the next year is patience. next quehink that you know, that americans should be entitled to, you know, decent health care. you know, at a decent cost. i don't think obama is going around about doing it the right way. neil: that's fine.

you can make a statement. doesn't have to be in the form of a question. actually agree with you on both counts. don't say i didn't didn't warn u the whole health care thing would be going down for the count. tweets, everyone is getting in on the deal. notorious writes, i think you need to pull that stick out of your ass, neil. thank goodness i always won wondered why my back was killing me. maybe maria will take over neil's job. isn't neil getting old, now? kevin, are you getting a little old to write these kind of tweets right now. that is a good hashtag. they wouldn't prove those wide angl camera shots on you. thank you, uncle morphine. take se morphine ad how about we be done with you! cavuto said jpmorgan layoffs are because of government regulation. he left out the company made 24 billion in revenue. whatever insanity or hashtag you

self, i did not, not, say the layoffs from jpmorgan were because of government regulation. i said because of all the these government finese've been seeing. so hashtag imbecile. drum guy, you just showed, clip of yrself from 1987, hashtag, bad hair day. every day since my friend. every day since of the hashtag, thanks for reminding me ruining my day. bill in washington, had it with nasty emails i've been getting. i like it fine. i really enjoy your show and you. put the whiners around crybabies do it somewhere else. like msnbc where they would probably be more at home. rita from connectut, neil, you're out standing in your field because you connect wh your viewers. you come acrs as sincere and no one in your business can beat at your guests seem to genuinely like you and i like your widow's peak what widow's peak? thankthank you for saying i'm sincere. that has taken me years to perfect.

meanwhile, california, who chooses your suit and ties for your shows? you're the best-dressed on fox. for the record i agree with you, not varney. well i will let stuart know that. he needs to be hum bed now and then. my outfits all the credit goes to the folks here at fox who know fashion, not anchors like and certainly varney who do not. meanwhile roger at gmail addressing even more personal questions i get. boxers or briefs? and answer is? depends. that's nice. john, via yahoo! i applaud calling out your detractors that criticize your voice. kudos for not making excuses and hiding health issues. you're hardest working guy on tv. your the best sense of humor. please interrupt liars, spinners and sid i don't think so. they waste your time and answer. why can't answer the question. why indeed. you better talk to phillies in

las vegas. sheave had it. cavuto, control yourself and shut up! you're so busy trying to prove you're smart and you're not. you get dumber every second you interrupt your otherwise more stimulating guests. this viewer will get stimulated elsewhere. phyllis, exactly what do you mean by stimulated elsewhere? it's a family sw, yng lady. christie in baton rouge. fox anchors like to talk you remind me of my butcher. like him you also give me the beef. touche, chrissie, touche. al leaks, what is the deal with your hairpiece. don't you make sure it is straight before you go on air. it was all out of place last night. all right. alex for the 1,000, one millionth time this is not a hairpiece but on such matters yvonne, aol, do you dye your hair? ceainly looks lik you do. no, yvonne, i do not. but dye myairpiece. linda in miami, neil, are you

into threesomes? linda, i have discussed three stocks on this shoo many times. sometimes as many as 10. on the same night. where are you people coming from? cal, in washington, d.c. cavuto you're not all italian, no? you're on to me. half irish, cal. bill in lexington, kentucky, if i already had a lot of mom why the hell should i watch you? to make a lot ofore money, bill. sometimes conventional wisdom is right, but more often than that, tip, tip. pete in san jose, neil why do you talk to some ex-convictions. kozlowski, berni kerik. getting next tim they throw your fat criminal ass in jail? yes. yes, for all those lies i'm saying on the air and all that stuff you mentioned, exactly it, pete. i'm bracing forgoing to jail. people like you somehow get

through your screeners. okay. keep emails and tweets coming. thank you very, very much. for watching again, what is the name of the segment, guys? >> what's the deal, kennedy: halley was it is about jews celebrated self. the oscars. like cheapskates wherewith goofy glasses good movies. table change the way you look at life but the bad ones make you grouchy you want to punch your hands through the screen. the movie industry is deeply subsidized the makes you pi's and cry if only you could do that on camera. put on and i stress