♪ neil: of was trying to think of this all day. you want 30 percent cleaner air. hello up paying 30 percent higher utility bills? that is what this is really coming to. the administration's quest to make for cleaner air by cleaning out your wallet in the process. the energy secretary himself has admitted that you could be killing the goose here. i want to emphasize. he says that the increase in oil has been, again, a great boon to america economically, we are focused on lowering oil into five independent committed said kleine at -- green out gas

emissions. the upshot is that for clean air we think you will find it worth it to pay a lot more. the former bush 41 chief of staff and new hampshire governor, our fox business all stars are back. okay. so, john, i am looking at this and thinking, assuming everyone is on board with a 30% more, at a minimum, can we really afford to do this as we are seeking out energy independence? >> well, let's give it its proper context. first of all, politically. global warning with 18 years of no warming and all, last 18 years, as virtually a dead issue, even politically and tell a democratic, very liberal billionaire comes along and tells obama and the democrats he will give them a hundred billion

in campaign funds if they get back on the source. they're is a political reason. economically, you are absolutely right. 70 million to 50 billion more in cost. is going to cost 250,000 jobs, virtually all of them blue-collar jobs that traditionally were a strong part of the base with the democratic party. so economically this does not make sense. the rate payer is going to get stuck with 30 percent more increase. environmentally this is another dumb move by the obama administration because even if the horror stories of their failed climate models were true, the impact that whenever they have calculated this is going to produce would not change temperatures by more than one one-hundredth of a degree. this is insanity. neil: i know you can't hear me when you are speaking, apologize for that.

i will put you down as a may be on this. [laughter] but you mentioned a little bit -- you mentioned before, very interesting because you were right to point out this odd pattern. billionaire environmentalist according to this time line seems like he is getting a lot of bang for that 100 million he has promised the democrats in april. he get the keystone the late, the white house crime report, the epa crackdown. so he is getting a lot of bang for its buck. what do you make of that? >> getting more bang for his buck than he is. there is nothing that will condemn more senate races to democratic boone than this kind of stability. i am waiting for senator john mansion in west virginia to say, enough is enough. as i am going to turn republican this will cost jobs. the keystone cost construction jobs. the added cost of this will cost regular manufacturing jobs. this is obama taking an already

moribund economy and making it even worse. neil: timing is not everything. is this the right time? even if you believe in this? >> well, to this point have conn. al-amin, of virginia, indiana, north dakota all at risk of losing seats. states that used a ton of coal and you have democratic seats on line which could make it go the other way. neil: michele, what do you think? >> they need this money. they absolutely do. they're vulnerable. they need the money. the people who tend to go out and vote during midterm elections are really the base of the democratic party republican party. we're talking about environmentalist. they're hoping that this will rally them so that it will go out and vote. americans in general are not happy. if you look at the polls college 27% of americans in that climate change should be a priority. not that many people, but in terms of midterm elections it is smart. in the and it will hurt the

american people and our economy. neil: he does not care about the political impact. here's why. you would not do this if he did. >> i actually agree with that. neil: that i have to change my mind. >> the one part of this that is perplexing me. what tracing noted, you have to of the biggest coal-producing states, kentucky and alaska was very key senatorial race is happening. if this is going to get anybody to come out and vote, it will be to the president and i would to. so. >> what you expect from this administration. >> i don't know why he did not do it in december january. >> he is getting last licks right now. >> she could have done it in january. >> up against the wire. neil: the politics of this, if you don't mind. that is why i want to go back to you. say what you will of the coal industry, they have made a plea -- great strides and cleaning up their act.

coal production is a big, big chunk of our energy reliability. 40 percent of our utility bills come from coal. i am wondering, if we slapped these and try to alienate the coal industry, are we not leaving ourselves more to the mercy of guys who really don't show much mercy for us? >> look, this is just a continuation of slaps against the energy industry in general. the coal industry, the oil industry, natural gas industry, this has been the pattern for this administration all along. but, frankly, if you want to talk politics, this is insane politically for obama. he may think that it is a wise move, but as usual he has not bought passed the first step. this, in the long run i think, is going to be a devastating issue politically. neil: he is thinking to 2030. we shall see. in the meantime, did jay carney

say what i thought he said? why his musings make me think now is just the right time to swap them out. after this. ♪ we asked people a question,

how much money do you think you'll need when you retire? then we gave each person a ribbon to show how many years that amount might last. i was trying to, like, pull it a little further. [ woman ] got me to 70 years old. i'm going have to rethink this thing. it's hard to imagin how much we'll need for a retirement that could last 3years or mor so maybe we need to approach things dferently, if we want to be ready for a longer retirement. ♪ if we want to be ready for a longer retirement. crestor lowered bad cholesterol in it's a fact. high-risk patients more than lipitor. bad cholesterol... you're going down!

yeah! lowering cholesterol is a big deal, especially if you have high cholesterol plus any of these risk factors, because you could be at increased risk for plaque buildup in your arteries over time. so, when diet and exercise aren't enough to lower cholesterol, adding crestor can help. i'm down with crestor! crestor is not right for everyone, like people with liver disease or women who are nursing, pregnant, or may become pregnant. tell your doctor about other medicines you're taking. call your doctor right away if you have muscle pain or weakness, feel unusually tired; have loss of appetite, upper belly pain, dark urine or yellowing of skin or eyes. these could be signs of rare but serious side effects. are you down with crestor!? ask your doctor if crestor could help you. if you can't afford your medication, astrazeneca may be able to help.

>> it was the assessment of the secretary of defense in consultation with the full national security team that there were sufficient mitigation steps taken by kutcher and assurances received by the united states that these detainee's do not pose a threat to u.s. national security. neil: all right. leaving aside this whole swap for this prisoner that has been held for five years and five, alleged terrorists swapped his place and not by right back to afghanistan but, instead to going -- ask yourself this, do you trust that they will hang on to these guys for this year time frame of which they're not to go to afghanistan?

in the ongoing crisis in this marine who is still stuck in a jail cell. the former congressman says this is not good. it is not, is it? >> no, it is not. it is a pleasure to be with you. when i think about the gentleman that we released back, this is like this -- the senior of the taliban. for us to think that they will abide by any kind of agreement, the exact same country that supported the muslim brotherhood why would they want to honor any type of agreement? what is most troubling is why would the obama administration listen to the taliban and tell them that these are the five individuals we want back? we should have made the decision that these are the five individuals you are going to get any of the 040 some odd folks being detained. but just as, you know, i think 2009-2010, leon panetta said

these individuals pose a. -- serious threat and should never be released. neil: leaving aside the monies that might have gone back and forth, when susan rice has trouble even calling them terrorists, listen to this, i think it compounds the problem. susan rice. >> point-blank, did the u.s. negotiate with terrorists? >> with the government to who won the zero agreed that. neil: okay. the bite went on longer but made less sense -- less sense. bottom line, she did not even use that term. >> well, first of all, consider the optics. why would you bring out susan rice, the last time she may several sunday talk show appearances she was talking about an anti islamic video and the end of this for what happened in benghazi. her credibility is absolutely shot. for her to sit there and try to make the american people believe

that the obama administration did not negotiate with terrorists, that is exactly what they did. alabama is a non state, nonbelligerent organization. they're not a nation state. we have established a very bad precedent. neil: how is this different than when israel extracts -- you know, hostage swaps all the time and other countries that have been varying degrees of this. i guess you could argue that their soldiers and people are always targets, and that is the fear, but no one doubts their resolve when it comes to looking after its own interest. >> i think it is tough when you are a nation like israel that is receiving rockets and mortars each and every day. i know you are talking, after july, the israeli soldier that was exchanged. again, look at the rate of recidivism.

if we continue to act with this warped sense of west and benevolence where we are exchanging individuals for terrorists that go right back on to the battlefield, i think, one in six is the recidivism rates. we are setting a very bad precedent. but then israel does also go out and strike back against these groups, hamas, has blocked by any of the others. but right now we have to question ourselves as to why we do this and why we established a horrible precedent now where it will be a matter of who is the next person that the taliban, al qaeda, these other groups can get their hands on to negotiate with the american government. neil: are you running for president? >> i am running for my help each and every day right now. [laughter] neil: you're not going to tell me, are you? >> well call look. you tell me what your mother said when i was up there in new york city. there are a lot of people we

need to consider. i think it would be disrespectful and this message to the american people if they come up to you and ask you to at least consider. we have to sit back and look. pray about it. tucked away. neil: we will see. i can't actually. neil: oh, i'm sorry. neil: always good seeing you. thank you very much. >> the pleasure. neil: don't do it on o'reilly. all right -- >> fox business let me get a word in. neil: there we go. we will give you more words. i thank you. in the meantime, for-profit -- at dirty word in washington. for-profit colleges. wow. i mean, it is like a 4-letter word. why it is making the judge sick after this. ♪ (vo) rush hour around here

starts at 6:30 a.m. - on the nose. but for me, it starts with the opening bell. and the rush i get, lasts way more than an hour. (announcer) at scottrade, we share your passion for trading. that's why we've built powerful technology to alert you to your next opportunity. because at scottrade, our passion is to power yours.

i got more advice than i knew what to do with. what i needed was information i could trust on how to take care of me and my baby. luckily, unitedhealthcare has a simple program that helps moms stay on track with their doctors and get the right care and guidance-before and after the baby is born. simple is good right now. (anncr vo) innovations that work for you. that's health in numbers. unitedhealthcare.

♪ neil: all right. i always suspected the president had a problem with anyone making a product, but here he is zeroing in on colleges. i was thinking to myself -- and i am not nearly as smart as my friend. is it at the goal of any enterprise to make money? against the grain and how much, but i guess, judge, they're going into the university of phoenix. a lot of these on-line places that make money hand over fist. >> i have no personal familiarity with corinthian or phoenix, but they are honest enough to acknowledge that they are in the marketplace to make money. places like princeton, harvard, and yell -- and i am an alumnus of one of those three -- are claiming to be nonprofit and are

making a fortune for themselves to pay their presidents and professors good salaries. neil: but there is nothing wrong with that. judge napolitano: there is absolutely nothing wrong with it. what is the judgment shoes that it admits it is for profit and leave alone. neil: these particular type of schools, while they account for one and ten of those attending for private colleges, they account for close to have the default rate. judge napolitano: isn't that for consumers to decide? is an affront the consumer to decide? , the consumer say, i am not going to go there because i spandex and did not get value. this is just not the function of a government that cannot deliver the mail. neil: what about that large "cavuto" rate? do you think the government has an obligation to chase this? judge napolitano: i think the government should have nothing to do with education. that is not the rsponsibility. decided to start micromanaging.

not micromanaging education. now this administration which is much more akin to micromanaging and bush. neil: you are against in general judge napolitano: i am against the federal government. neil: when you were at princeton and earning your 40, did you pay for it on your own? neil: you can make anyone feel good. neil: i no you're smart. when you were there did you have health? judge napolitano: it did not come from the government. neil: it was not a guy named vinnie. judge napolitano: it was not a guy named vinnie. the government sometimes does a very good thing whether it enables people to go to school who otherwise could not get there, but when the government had to pay off those loans, it is merely a transfer of their obligation from them to you and me and everyone watching this now. if that transferor taxing you and me to pay for someone else's lawn because they did not pay it back authorized by the constitution, it is not.

the federal government's ability to regulate, whether it be branson of the university of phoenix. one charges more than the other. neil: i guess the whole argument is that the more we of them, the more the schools, for profit or not up the underlying tradition. judge napolitano: correct. it just makes things more expensive. who ultimately bears the burden? neil: what would andrew napolitano do? judge napolitano: keep the federal government out altogether. there would have to go to their -- their parents would have to go to banks to borrow, or the public education, at the state of new jersey wants to own a college like ours, it can certainly charge less than a desk. neil: are private institutes, some of the most elite on the

planet of princeton. judge napolitano: find another source other than the federal government. you know that would do to the quest? bring it down. neil: nothing would bring the cost of prints and down. judge napolitano: even they have to follow the laws of economics. wait, ben bernanke is there. i forgot. neil: you are being very modest. have a feeling that u.s. scholarships and the like, it was not to the and judge. judge napolitano: so long ago, i don't remember. neil: as it was with me and trucking school. but it drive. judge, thank you, my friend. always a pleasure. he is so thin and fate is very annoying, but i digress. the nsa is making a last, and you are probably on it. i always wonder what ron paul would think of that. you know what you think of that. ♪ but if passion...

became your business. at&t can help simplify how you manage it. so you can focus on what you love most. when everyone and everything works together, business just sings.

does your mouth often feel dry? a dry mouth can be a side effect of many medications but it can also lead to tooth decay and bad breath. that's why there's biotene. available as an oral rinse, toothpaste, spray or gel, biotene can provide soothing relief, and it helps keep your mouth healthy, too. remember, while your medication is doing you good, a dry mouth isn't. biotene -- for people who suffer from dry mouth.

♪ neil: all right. now you can be really paranoid. the nsa is finally collecting millions of images for its facial recognition data base. but what if they're is a mix up. for instance, there are a lot of people who looks similar but they could easily be confused. check out some of the celebrity look-alikes. pretty much exactly like the drummer from the red hot chili peppers. this actress looks just like katie perry. and, of course, there is mine, the image of brad pitt. has anything -- that is enough out of any of you back home. i think i am hearing ron paul sniggering, i don't think it's about how far this could go to my former texas congressman. this is a very slippery slope

it, if you think about it, congressman. >> well, they have been on the slope for a long time, it is a shame. just another reason to get rid of the nsa. in the republic the government is supposed to be set up to protect the privacy of individuals and to reveal any secrets. now we have a government that does everything in secrecy, everything to undermine the privacy of the individual, and this is just another step. incrementalism. they're is a cancer. we have to stop it. it is good only in the sense that maybe someone will wake up and say, why do they need all this? they might make a mistake, but the bigger picture, they have no business doing it in the first place. they always make mistakes. governments are inclined to make mistakes. this is the reason it should not exist, but you cannot just say we are going to monitor it, take pictures. we have to look at the principal. the government has no right to

do this, and the people should not put up with the. neil: you have reminded me that if the technology and wherewithal is there, a company is certainly going to seize on that technology, and the government is going to seize on that technology. i am just worried, regardless of who does it, it is a stretch. and leaving aside all the things they could get wrong, it is a huge intrusion. no one seems to say -- did not make hackles about it. >> and there is one thing that is going on that is really annoying the officials, and that is the use of the cell phone. the as far as i'm concerned, we've reveal some of the abuses out there for law-enforcement agencies. we should have license to take pictures of the police brutality and get that information out, but guess what? they are really cracking down. i mean, you hear stories about my took out my cell phone to

take pictures. they came down hard. they do not want us to know what is happening, and that is the issue. but, really the resistance comes from the fact of the american people are not out raised enough. there are just a few of us. one of these days they will become outraged enough to make sure that it stops. that is what usually happens. the people who have outrage with some of these programs, or the country becomes so broke that they cannot afford it anymore. that is certainly what happens and foreign policy in all these agencies of government and government medical care and these kinds of things. usually they run out of money and the bureaucracy gets too big hopefully there is more outrage over programs like this. hopefully it just does not go away, but i am afraid that it probably will. neil: you know what i wonder, even when congress tries to rein in the in and say, i almost think they are like james bond and all of these secret agencies

they just do their own thing and are forever find it and forever ignore whenever politicians of john and. and that is what worries me. when a lot of this, and the president said he was unaware. add on know if he is telling the truth, but it would scare me more if he were. we are that a year and of what is shadow government is doing. >> and also, we have not got an awful lot of help from the courts. recently they -- the supreme court refused to hear this contest about national defense authorization. they let this stand. and that is a big issue, you know, about illegal arrests and secret prisons and tortures and assassination, but the courts cannot seem to be on our side. has to be really at a grassroots level -- and that is why i have decided to the best of my ability to talk to young people, and maybe they will grow up and do a better job than our generation.

neil: i will say this of you, i can remember, you would be talking to young people about money supply and money velocity, and it would be ripping and roaring like it was a concert. so for some reason we dismiss our young and how smart they are, but you did not. >> the one thing is that they have not heard it, and it is logical. this old idea that if someone needs money they counterfeit it. yet people, their minds are not cluttered with all the opaganda. they say, you know, that makes sense. yes, it we can get them to challenge the federal reserve cannot get into towns the attack on civil liberties and who knows, we might get them to challenge our foreign interventions overseas, which had made no sense to me. neil: you have been consistent commands you while that crowd. it is always a pleasure, congressman. >> thank you. neil: tell me what is wrong with

this picture. very racist comments, and i am thinking, it is just a younger version of donald sterling. where is the pile on for justice just asking. ♪ my name is karen and i have diabetic nerve pain. it's progressive pain. first that feeling of numbness. then hot pins. almost like lightning bolts, hot strikes into my feet. so my doctor prescribed lyrica. the pain has been reduced and i feel better than i did before. [ male announcer ] it's known that diabetes damages nerves. lyrica is fda-approved to treat diabetic nerve pain. lyrica is not for everyone. it may cause serious allergic reactions or suicidal thoughts or actions. tell your doctor right away if you have these, new or worsening depression, or unusual changes in mood or behavior. or, swelling, trouble breathing, rash, hives, blisters, changes in eyesight, including blurry vision, muscle pain with fever, tired feeling or skin sores from diabetes. common side effects are dizziness, sleepiness, weight gain

and swelling of hands, legs and feet. don't drink alcohol while taking lyrica. don't drive or use machinery until you know how lyrica affects you. those who have had a drug or alcohol problem may be more likely to misuse lyrica. [ karen ] having less pain, that means everything to me. [ male announcer ] ask your doctor about lyrica today.

♪ neil: all right. justin bieber and donald trump. what is the difference? they both made it very racist remarks. donald sterling and about a hundred hours of tape. ancient video for i young justin bieber. when he was all of 15. what is seen now, tracy, 20? key used the n-word, has profusely apologized sense. first and foremost, the former democratic congressman, presidential candidate, dennis kucinich, what do you make of this? are the comparable, or is one

less than the other? >> well, first of all, with respect to justin bieber, he was 15 years old when he made that remark. he apologized and then. he apologized again for the video being released. my question is this, how much more racist and other real-life conditions which so many african-american families have to live in today? that is what we ought to be talking about, opportunities that have been lost in housing, unemployment, education, drops in median income. all of these things other real-life conditions that people live in that are really racist. that is what we ought to be talking about instead of some market kid made five years ago. neil: what about remarks a former team honor made five weeks ago. donald sterling, do you find those remarks, regardless of the undermining problem. >> here is the point. the racist remarks would not have a sting if you did not have exigent conditions that are at a

depression level in the black community, and that is why we have to call everyone who says those things to account, but we have to get underneath it, go deeper, go to the real life conditions that people are and what the unemployment among african males being twice the national average. neil: would you hold them to account? this situation with the african-american community notwithstanding, what you just say that alone, stupid, asinine thing to say, we don't care if you are 15 -- >> no one gets any exceptions. and he has not. he apologized. but we have to go beyond this to look at what is happening. you have 1 million of over 2 million people incarcerated in this country happen to be african-americans. what is going on in this country. we have to start looking deeper and a real serious crisis that we have in the country that relates to race. a big part of it is economic.

neil: my friends and colleagues, one of the things the struck me is, donald sterling showing up at an african-american church in l.a. it just starting to say that he was invited. i feel and was very moved by this event. now these the kinds of things that you do, besides apologizing , to win yourself back with the community? >> absolutely. what he is doing right now is trying to do some pr, make the african-american community happy, but i think the difference between donald sterling and justin bieber is that justin bieber is 50 years old year. everyone agrees that the is a little pot, going through some growing pains. it does not excuse what he did. however, donald sterling on the other hand has decades of history of discriminating. we don't know of justin bieber being discriminatory in any way. he said something stupid, but he surrounds himself with african-americans all the time.

his best friends are african-american. we know of no incidents in which she was discriminatory. i think that is a big difference >> i think that is the problem. the languages accepted among the african-american community. we should not be speaking like this to each other at all. it is a fine line. being a 59-year-old kid, a crusted unknowingly. first, sterling, going to church come on. you're not a racist on monday and not on tuesday in pretty have years of damage to make up for. neil: we all have awakenings. >> i'm not buying it for a second. >> is a big difference. justin bieber mara not have hurt his career, but he hurt himself. donald sterling heard his employees, many of whom are african-american, his league which he is contractually obligated not to do, causing enormous damage. it is not as simple as we'd all like him anymore. you never liked him.

the guy is a jerk. this was just a continuation of that. neil: a multi billionaire. more so. >> who cares about justin bieber ? neil: well, there is that. at think you are dismissing both of these characters were very good reason. but the irony is try to mr. ra ., sterling is going to be a lot more rich as a result of this dustup. if the deal goes through and he sells the team to his wife, he is going to make $2 billion. on to find those comments as effective as they are, say what you will of the african-american community community has not been punished one iota. what do you make of that? >> first of all, his reputation has been severely damaged. now -- [inaudible conversations] hope that since there isre, the

redemption for everyone, he will make an earnest effort to try to look at the disparities that exist in our society and do something in his life that remains -- neil: how would be like justin bieber coming up with a song you would want to listen to. [laughter] >> everyone should do that. you have only 47 percent of african-american males graduating from high school. he could help in doing something with that. we have a situation where african-americans, their net worth dropped 60% from 2005- 2005-2009, and it is only one 20th of what the majority of americans have. neil: very good point. it. >> ticket no sold the team before this all happened trichosis same price. but you take away that massive taxes will be paying. it would have been pretty darn close. >> you do it on a smaller sum.

neil: this has nothing to do with the subject. >> it does. what he cares about is the cachet. neil: he cares about the cash. >> otherwise why would you fight it? neil: your annoying. [laughter] neil: really. thank you. when we come back -- i'm kidding i don't mean that. anyway, when we come back, you know, the president wants wi-fi for the world, internet for the world. it will cost an arm and a leg. along comes a private company has is they will do it. i'm going with them. that is just me. ♪ we're moving our company to new york state. the numbers are impressive. over 400,000 new private sector jobs... making new york state number two in the nation

in new private sector job creation... with 10 regional development strategies to fit your business needs. and now it's even better because they've introduced startup new york... with the state creating dozens of tax-free zones where businesses pay no taxes for ten years. become the next business to discover the new new york. [ male announcer ] see if your business qualifies. stick with innovation. stick with power.usiness to discover the new new york. stick with technology. get the flexcare platinum from philips sonicare and save now. philips sonicare

♪ neil: all right. time for a "biz blitz." how about unchanged for the world, or at least much of rural

america. the president has been pushing public spending. along comes google to say, hey, we can do this for free. at least, for you. i hundred and 80 satellites. you don't have to pay a thing. the world is wired. we are ready to go. what do you think of that? >> i love it. let them do it. look, it is self-serving for google our right? the more they get, who cares? let them do it. i think it is good for everyone. neil: there is also talk that they will follow up on the hot air balloon thing that will allow, i guess, access. i don't know how that works. but they are going to do it. if they're going to do it and have the financial muscle to do it, let them do it. >> i don't even understand why the government thought that they needed to do this. there is already incentive. they want to get young people hooked on to the internet right away. i don't understand why this administration was even thinking

about wasting time. neil: concerned about what we're showing. outer limit. it looks like they are attacking the earth. [laughter] neil: anyway. >> let's not get it confused. google is proposing to make more internet available where it is not. with the administration months before, 44 -- neil: giving away for free. >> they propose that schools had better connections. they have internet. they have not said there would hook up for schools. neil: you trust the government more than google. >> oh, my god. >> hold on. if you are a school in new york and don't have a good connection to the internet -- and there are schools that don't. google, what they're putting a pair has nothing to do with new york. it will target rural areas. neil: bottom line, they will provide service for everybody. >> it is also quality of service

what the president was trying to say, it is free. if it is junk service -- >> i think, why not let them. >> there are going to start rural and go everywhere. one hundred ney satellites now, 380 in a year or so. i'm telling you. just you watch. circle back. neil: we will circle to this next issue from, you know, satellites and the skies to interest rates tumbling into the basement. right now we are at the year-lows. what the heck is going on here. the economy supposedly is doing okay. what happened? >> i think the global economy is struggling. there is not much confidence. and germany's unemployment rate went up to almost 3 million people. their just is not confidence in the global economy. neil: it might be that. it is interesting that it is not just the united states. greece or turkey or italy. you should welcome this.

>> again, we look like the less sick patient, unfortunately. the demand for our treasuries is going up and the demand that comprise seven, yield down. that is where we are. the only upshot would be mortgage rates going down to six people don't take advantage of that. >> and this is going to be profoundly unpopular, but i am going to say it. we have an infrastructure that is sending gas into a third world status. why are we not taking advantage of this almost free money to get the money we need to make these improvements? i don't get it. >> you are talking shovel ready. >> government should be borrowing this money. neil: we have no trouble borrowing money. >> that has been essentially what they are encouraging them to do all along. >> i don't understand why we are not doing it. it is at -- neil: is this a fox business alert? >> we have not been borrowing for infrastructure which is my

point. everyone will say we are deeply in debt, and we are. neil: you're a man who read marvel comics and are making that -- >> if i could have borrowed money at those rates i would have expanded the -- neil: you know, the world is telling us something. i don't know whether it is coughing upon the recovery or something more ominous. what do you think? >> i think it is saying this recovery is laymen nothing good is happening. of all the places to go commit is treasury. that is pathetic at best. neil: way you see it all going? >> not in a good direction. people just don't see the economy getting better. the economy is getting better, but people don't feel it. they don't have confidence and it. neil: he is not gone hell, to be fair. >> see, michele, you just -- see, michele, you don't even know the things you say. neil: all right. i want to thank you all very

much. meanwhile, this funny, cute, super smart, a super hero is here to serve you. now you know. that is fine (mother vo) when i was pregnant... i got more advice than i knew what to do with. what i needed was information i could trust on how to take care of me and my baby. luckily, unitedhealthcare has a simple program that helps moms stay on track with their doctors and get the right care and guidance-before and after the baby is born. simple is good right now. (anncr vo) innovations that work for you. that's health in numbers. unitedhealthcare.

♪ our time is short

♪ this is our fate ♪ i'm yours neil: what is the deal with the government thinking more government is needed at the veteran agency? government created this problem, it is hardly the one to solve this problem. she writes everything it touches it destroys. veterans not getting care quickly enough, there is an app for that. saying i don't trust the government. mark wright what do you mean the va scandal if it took a person's long to not trust the government after the irs, nsa, fast and furious and obamacare, you are truly clueless.

claiming the two recent wars graded so many veterans needing health it overburdened the system. wasn't the purpose of obamacare to dump millions without any increase in doctors or nurses? i see a trend starting here. this goes back long before the war. and larry e-mailing the following. if the va has given this kind of health care, what i do they then done with disability claims? michael writes the government does not trust me, so why should i trust the government? trevor writes i did not trust the government before, no conservaves and libertarians have proof against government run health care. stephen long island, new york, i'm just average 59-year-old american public school teacher, how many americans will rethink their plan on joining the military? what will be the caliber of the ones that do? retired air force colonel writes the following: there is no way

to extricate the deadwood from the veterans health care system. then e-mails all right, if you are so smart, what is your solution to these long waits for our soldiers? in a word, vouchers to go to any hospital anytime if the va is overwhelmed. they should go to the front of the line, and he line. we'll come he said he never served so why are you addressing those who have? i appreciate them, simple as that. make it possible for me to do what i do, so on that basis alone i say we do more. helen writes i couldn't see you being a soldier, couldn't see you handling anything difficult at all. while we're at it, could not see you ever say anything positive about anyone. victor writes to talk about sacrifice sounds a bit rich. you are rich and likely have a

known hardship so quit saying you can relate to those who have. you would be surprised i am on that subject. writing don't you think our more than an anchor speaking on their behalf? yeah, i do come a lot more, like all of us speaking on their behalf. i met you once and told you how much i appreciated fox and you to the time to even sign the one thing i had. do you know i sign that bank receipt? is already a collectors item, man. with the gettysburg address, i suspect. and right i love when you're superman's parts remind us true justice and the american way. neil, are you too cynical? you seem to come across like an idiot. am i wrong?

how is it a guy keeps you alive, how is it god lets you use a keyboard? i suspect to deal with idiots like you who are alive. you are a remarkable judge of character. in london. as a foreigner to your country allow me to say how impressed i am apparently anybody in america can achieve success. look at you, shining example to the world that idiots ca rise. a shining example for tightening our borders because any moron can e-mail. ignore your critics, you are cute as a button and sharp. let the others rip you, i am madly in love with you. stand in line. thank you. and thank you for all the e-mails, good or bad, that has not been doctored or touched up,

that is me, give or take a foot in the waist. we will see you tomorrow. any nastyou don't want to see what happens, that is all i am saying. good night. kennedy: so what do we have? a hero or a trader? as details emerge we're trying to figure out if the guy suffered from stockholm syndro syndrome. if he is to be believed he was a hippie trader who grew disillusioned with the job and walk away. feebly the white house, no man should be left behind on the battlefield. he is an american hero even if he served his time. there's a lot more to this story than we are steerin seeing and . i am in a good mood because it is international whore day.