but my airline miles take it worldwide. [ male announcer ] it shouldn't be this hard. with creditcards.com, it's easy to search hundreds of cards and apply online. creditcards.com. . neil: that one still gets me. maybe the video of the illegals protesting outside the white house for rights they're not entitled to clinched it. americans have had enough of it, sick of it. and today, the stunning poll that proves it. welcome, everybody, i'm neil cavuto, and mr. president, read it and weep. 7 out of 10 americans think your immigration policy can take a flying leap. a new gallup poll says 66% of americans disapprove of your border mess and keeps getting costlier, something that won't make the numbers look better.

the white house is seriously considering granting amnesty for up to 6 million illegals who are already here. only talk. but someone launched this trial balloons, so why? some say that the white house is just trying to rile up republicans and get them back to that impeachment talk the democrats argue has proven such a great fund-raising tool. that's hard to say. this much is not. those tens of thousands of so-called kids, many of whom are frankly older than kids, well, they're here, and they're not going anywhere any time soon. we've already told but plans to process each and every one of them including enrolling them for schools this fall. whether communities can handle the burden or expense. the tweets and the texts and the e-mails have not stopped and our editors are trying to clean up some of their salty language, they've not stopped either. keep them coming. we want to hear from you, we clearly see the illegal

immigration is infuriating you. keep telling us, tweeting us at hashtag cavuto. first to steve forbes who eerily predicted all of this, and here we be. if the president after labor day, limits the number of deportations, or goes so far as to grant amnesty to millions, the executive order, how do you think that's going to go? >> what it's going to do if he does it before the elections, it's a electoral disaster. whether you want immigration reform or not, people can't stand the sight of tens of thousands of young kids, nothing done about it, no emissaries sent to central american countries trying to stop it. who's organizing it? they see a border out of control, and that frightens people. neil: i saw the risk of that, too. and many who look in the political base and say this will help him with key groups. >> your poll belies that.

neil: exactly. >> it's one thing when people came across the border, here for years, you got a debate on that. when you have this ongoing now as we sit and speak, tens of thousands coming across, obviously, a lot of organization involved doing nothing to say, okay, we're going to take them back, put them in a bus, be humane and start take them back, there's none of that. people are saying we're encouraging it, tacitly encouraging it, it's got them riled up. it's a huge increase in the numbers. one thing a couple of thousand, this has been increasing exponentially and in response to the white house. the most photo-oping loving president refuse to go to the border and say we got to do something. he's saying i'm staying in charge of it, overlooking it, obviously, he's encouraging it. neil: he met with the leader of guatemala and el salvador for the latest batch of illegals to come to say it's our fault.

the honduran president says it's our fault and unclear immigration laws, what do you think of that? >> people pass the buck along. the bottom line is you can have the photo-ops you want. if you're not seeing or telling the young people and telling their parents, we're taking measures so we're coming back. we'll do it nicely, they're starting to come back. neil: they're emboldened by this. >> they're emboldened. neil: you are very good with money, and fear the communities tens of thousand of kids fanned out are going to have to suck up the cost of registers for school and classes. we're told that help is on the way but we shall see, in the meantime, by law they have to register and educate these kids? >> this infuriates people. the communities get these unexpectedly. uncle sam says we'll help out, the taxpayers, and people are infuriated. you are encouraging it, and have you us pick up the tab.

that's a dereliction of duty. neil: some of the images, folks are from towns and cities a long way to the border in boston and detroit and on and on. to fox biz all-stars joining us, hadley heath manning and mark toronto. mark, this gets out of control really, really fast. what i'm not clear on is how it got out of control so fast. >> the numbers, as steve said. 60% is a damning vote of no confidence in the president's ability to protect us and the borders. >> key constituencies who feel he's well the them down on this. >> they're the ones that got us here. how did we get here in the activists in the base of the democratic party. he's doing a calculated risk. though the numbers show a lot of dissension, it's the base with the president looking to activate for turnout this fall. that's what this is all about.

neil: that would boomerang if they are more offended than they are enthused? >> based on experience in 2012, they want the hispanic caucus in the congress and a lot of the activists are getting the president. neil: to do it now. i agree with steve on this point. i believe it, i know behind the scenes meeting with the president to say whatever you're planning, don't do it before election day. there has been talk they're going to announce the deportation thing to cool it on deportations after labor day or around labor day weekend, and they said that would not be good timing for us. how does it work? help or hurt him? >> well, the inaction is as much of a problem as the wrong action in this case, neil. we have a crisis at the border and it wraps up so many issues. it's a national security issue, a issue of budgeting and money, an issue of fairness for the millions who have stood their wait in line to become american citizens. it raises a lot of questions,

that's why 68% of people disa prove. neil: i wonder why the poll with hispanics on this issue and republicans are hurting their image. but if i'm doing everything right, the process to become a u.s. citizen, i don't care where i'm from and someone cuts in line and gets a free pass or goes made and protests outside the white house and doesn't get so much as a summons, i don't know if i'm enamored of the party that espouses that? >> one of the key things here, and i wish the republicans would run with it is reform of immigration system. those who play by the rules are punished. you face excruciating delays. there is no real rationale unless you're a member of a family. people bring skills in can't get in. if the republicans advocate it, make sure those are playing by the rules, get speedy and just treatment, that would be very popular thing. neil: the republicans tough

stance now in your eyes, hurt republicans? >> no. on the border issue, with these kids, i think almost everyone is saying this is ridiculous, absolutely outrageous, and the republicans coupled it with let's not punish those playing by the rules, i think that's a winner. neil: okay, we're going to take a quick break here. another day, another scandal. this one though not involving the irs, this one not involving the va. something called the export-import bank. that makes people's eyes glaze over. when i tell you what's going on there, and, you know, all of a sudden we've got problems. darrell issa on the latest scandal you probably don't know, but you're going to want to learn about and fast.

. neil: well, democrats are not necessarily big fans of darrell issa, the house oversight chair of pointing out corruption in abuse in favorite agencies. now set sights on the export-import bank. an organization that encourages

foreign countries to buy from u.s. companies, and now there's been indications of abuse and the california republican is warring with conservatives and liberals. conservatives are saying get rid of the export-import bank and others saying no, no, go slow. congressman you are in the middle of this mess. how big is the incident. 40 million dollars of corruption, payoffs and the like, people see that and say that's a bad bank, shut it down, you say what? >> it's the only one of its kind, since the 1930s it has promoted and encouraged and financed export american products creating american jobs and american wealth. it's a pretty essential item to have, never controversial on renewing. but with four convictions, four people, three of whom have been dismissed that started almost a

decade ago, the process of getting people who do wrong at xm bank is way too long. the id identified approximately 40 cases, how do we make it more transparent? how do we make sure corruption is rooted out quickly to have confidence in a bank that we rely on to promote exports. neil: do we need it that badly, congressman? some of the numbers are china supports, it's various companies, getting business from abroad to the tune of 115 billion dollars a year, all the european companies and countries together, you know, provide a similar amount. and here we are, guests in the 27, $28 billion neck of the woods. would it make that big a difference if it were not there? >> the bank is sustaining, we're not look at taxpayer dollars being spent unless the bank is run poorly. right now it is run from a fiscal standpoint fairly well.

let's look at europe versus the united states. they have airbus, we have boeing. both of these companies compete in a world market where the financing package is part of the process, and the financing dollars are so great, it would reduce boeing's ability to meet demand, particularly on the 787 dreamliner and others, if they didn't have a bank like xm. do we need to maintain the bank? yes. is there a whole lot of cleaning up to do and shouldn't reauthorize for a long period of time without putting those in place? absolutely. the american people are at risk if this bank is poorly run, if it's properly run, it is a self-sustaining entity that costs the american taxpayer nothing. neil: that is the hope when you alluded to airbus, a european consortium, it has the muscle of a lot of european countries behind it. you're quite right. but there is this other view that if we need the propose of

an agency like this at a time like this, then we're hurting more than we think. are you saying that with the scandals, with the abuse and the payoffs, and like i say 40 some odd instances of this activity, that it's still worth it in the end? do we get that much bang? not for the taxpayer, but it does come back us to. is it really worth it? >> i've been an exporter and know what it's like competing in countries where we don't bribe the other side does. we don't have deep pockets of a country backing us and have the financing of an xm bank, having the loan guaranty can make all the difference in offering a loan or not. neil: are you surprised? -- i'm sorry, sir, you are surprised you have encountered more resistance on the right than you have so far on the left on this particular scandal? >> it's not surprising. it's been one of the challenging that the xm banks

and other agencies faced. they've been around a long time. they've done a certain amount of good, and everybody says haven't they run their course. in a world market where other countries are providing a similar incentive for taking their products, it does make a difference that we have an equivalent and equivalent that our domestic banks are not always prepared to make. can we make the bank work better? make sure it doesn't risk taxpayer dollars? absolutely. should we end something that's promoting the sale of ge, boeing and thousands of smaller companies, and most people don't know the name of? of course not. it is important. remember, domestic jobs created by export is the greatest win-win we have as americans, importing products from other countries where the jobs are outside our country are part of our problem. xm is part of the solution. i want to make sure it is open and honest and accountable. right now it isn't.

neil: always good seeing you, congressman. be well. >> thank you. neil: president obama as you know is upping the ante when it comes to trying to punish vladimir putin. the trouble with upping the ante is you have to get others to pony up as well. what if we're leery against going too far against putin? what if a lot of u.s. citizens don't want to play? after this. in new york state, we're changing the way we do business, with startup ny. we've created tax free zones throughout the state. and startup ny companies will be investing hundreds of millions of dollars in jobs and infrastructure. thanks to startup ny, businesses can operate tax free for 10 years. no property tax. no business tax. and no sales tax. which means more growth for your business, and more jobs. it's not just business as usual. see how new york can help your business grow, at startup.ny.gov

. neil: president obama's right. this can't be a new cold war. why? because we're doing a lot of business with russia. this is amazing. we did a little digging and actual u.s. exports to russia have been going up, not down,

even after we imposed sanctions. so this takes a look how these add up. some say maybe russia is taking orders now, ahead of tougher sanctions. that makes sense. but can you see the trend for the time being. back with our all-stars. mark, what do you make of this? >> politics and the economy. the president is talking tough for the sake of politics, but he wants to do business with russia for the sake of our economy. putin is benefitting because the president is talking tough. if you looked at sanctions the president announced yesterday. france is selling warships to russia. germany is selling equipment. neil: i was surprised france makes warships. >> exactly. this is the soft sanction policy of the president of the united states, where he talk tough and acting softly, and if you take a look at a worse example. take a look at iran, where the

administration is encouraging medical and agricultural companies to do business with iran when iran hasn't conceded anything yet under nuclear program. neil: sanctions generally have to work if the country is imposing them, or willing to endure a little pain themselves. >> that's true. and in terms of the russians, they've got a real weak point. that is the oligarchs. he's done a little against the oligarchs. if you want to put the squeeze on, you hit the people around him. neil: freeze the assets? >> freeze assets where, they are around the world. neil: taking their money out wherever they're going to be. >> there's no place to hide in this world today. neil: really? >> and we see with that french bank that we felt they were violating the iranian sanctions, we put a $10 billion fine on it. you put the squeeze on there. neil: then what? >> then you take yukos, the energy company he destroyed because he didn't like the ceo,

there's a $50 billion judgment that came down from the hague. neil: he's not going pay, that by the way? >> he won't pay it. you can attach assets around the world. there are a lot of things that hit hard. >> the russian stock market, the ruble itself has now come back to levels before any of this stuff hit the fan. i don't know what that says about russia and its power to sort of overcome, or the fact that either the world or the russian markets don't think this will amount to much. what do you think? >> well, some people believe it won't amount to much, neil, but the fact that sales of american goods to russia have increased 17% march through may is an indication that some russian buyers are thinking that the sanctions may be real. that in the future, they need to stockpile the goods. neil: the store might be closeing. >> exactly. that's the fear anyway. neil: i wonder if you are russia and know the people you

are dealing with are nervous because they don't want hits on themselves, they are 20 times more exposed than wetor russia. they desperately need russian energy and a lot of other stuff. post this plane crash, they're not going to want to go too, too far. >> they don't understand it. there is no specificity, they don't have guidance from the federal government. they're not sure whether they are in jeopardy or not. neil: in violation of the law or not. none of these are grandfathered in. >> we need an energy policy to supplant russia as the natural gas supplier to europe. neil: and compensate for them -- >> the federal government is dragging its heels on approving natural gas liquefied facilities. process has started. that starts to erode russia's credibility. neil: stick around.

do any of you remember this particular promise? >> americans buying comparable coverage to what they have today, i already said this, would see premiums fall by 14-20%? neil: except if you're in california and seen them rocket

. neil: all right, broken record or another health care broken promise? it's time to rerack the tape. remember this? >> we're going to work with your employer and lower premiums by $2500 per family per year. >> lower the costs of premiums. >> lower the costs of your premiums by up to $2500. >> a plan that lowers premiums by $2500. >> premiums are going to be lower. >> are going to be lower. >> whenever insurance premiums go up, you're told it's because of obamacare.

there's no evidence that that's the case. neil: you know i heard that so often, after a while i started believing it. so lo and behold we get word out of california's insurance commissioner, some residents in that fine state will see an 88% pop in their premiums this year. the national average of course since the health care law came into being, we've seen about a 30% surge. back with our biz all-stars, hadley and mark. hadley, i heard of sticker shock, that's a big old shock. >> and wow, neil, it's beginning to be hard to think of obamacare promise that's been kept. so many of the promises have been broken, but when it comes to the premium increases, it's not just happening in california, not just happening in the employer market. many of the people that the insurance commissioner is talking about in the state of california are in the exchange, and you say they might see a premium increase. actually, they may not see the premium increase because

democrats focus on the subsidized averages of premiums available in exchanges. subsidies don't reduce costs, they shift costs. they hide costs but the unsubsidized price of the insurance plans in the exchange and enormous. neil: subsidies are something that counter lower income filers or those who want to enroll to compensate for the costs of the plan itself. that's called into question whether it's legal the way they're run right now. steve, how big a deal is this? is california unique? or are premiums going to continue, it's been a fairly dramatic upswing? >> what you get for the higher premium is shocking people. you didn't have the breadth of coverage that you had before. there's that. and the administration is allegedly, and i think it's true, putting pressure on insurers. will find ways to make up for the losses you take if you keep the price increases within line, certainly before the

november elections. they don't want a big sticker shock as you saw in california before the elections. so i think you're going to see more of that pressure, and then have to conjure up a new trick for 2016. one election cycle at a time. neil: i remember a lot of folks, they always will come up to me and ask the darndest things. neil, i'm not really signing up for the health care. i don't need it. let's say they work here but premiums have been skyrocketing anyway. and i didn't think that was going to happen. for others who sign up for the health care package and say wait a minute, i guess i'm in a very expensive gold plan, platinum plan and paying more than i thought i would and not getting the subsidies i thought. mass confusion and growing anger? >> not what we were told. and things are so bad in california, that the u.s. senators there support prop 45 on the ballot this november,

which will empower the insurance commissioner to regulate premium changes like utility rates are regulated in the state. that's how bad it is. they recognize that it's gotten so out of control, they need a regulator to come in. neil: could the insurance companies be real thieves and take advantage of that prior to something like that going down? >> sure, absolutely. they've been incentivized to do it, and the confusion is there for the premium payers. we're going to see the clips in campaign ads this fall. this is president obama's read my lips moment. you're going have the same doctor. your family is going to pay $2500 less per year, these are going to haunt the president and drag down democrats. neil: you know what's weird, four years after this thing came into being, there is such confusion, rampant confusion. i can't find two doctors, two nurses, two technicians, two anyone to agree on what it

means? >> this is why the whole thing is imploding and doing patch after patch after patch and keep this from collapsing altogether. the key thing is don't get sick for three years until we sort this out. even if you get another insurance policy, one of our daughter's private contractor lost insurance, got a market almost the same, costs her more. not at all. lot of stuff she thought she had, she didn't have. people are finding out what they thought they're getting, they're not getting. >> doctors are often smalls business people. neil: absolutely, excellent point. >> compliance costs. >> neil, steve mentioned the november elections this year, that's very important. and i hope people are paying attention to the fact that the proposed opening for open enrollment for 2015 coverage, the administration wants to start that on november 15th. last year it started october 1st or tried with

healthcare.gov and the failed launch. i believe pushing it back is a strategic, political move. they don't want people to see the new rates for 2015 before the midterm elections. neil: are you saying politics is coming into any of this? >> absolutely. at every turn, every turn. neil: when we come back, when you thought it was safe to go back in, a warning to florida residents. a deadly flesh-eating bacteria in the water, it's spreading. the news just gets better and better, doesn't it? unlimited cash back. let that phrase sit with you for a second. unlimited. as in, no limits on your hard-earned cash back. as in no more dealing with those rotating categories. the quicksilver card from capital one. unlimited 1.5% cash back on everything you purchase, every day. don't settle for anything less. i'll keep asking. what's in your wallet?

. neil: all right, now this is beginning to scare me. all right? have you this ebola breakout and the west nile worries. now a warning to florida beachgoers of a potentially deadly flesh-eating bacteria thriving in warm salt water to. dr. mark siegel. i like to have mark on, he calms everyone down. the first thing i said when i saw this, are we all going to

die? and he assured me know. there is a lot of worry, first of all to the florida thing, what's going on with that? >> that's a bacteria like cholera that lives in warm waters in oysters and occasionally will infect someone, the key word is occasionally. you have to go into the water with an open wound or bump up against a sea urchin and then the bacteria is there if glur florida or warm water area. very rare. neil: it's been in other places prior and people have dealt with it. what makes it grow? >> you get a wound, you get a bruise it looks like a wound and gets black in the middle of it, and you get a lot of pain, and the next thing you know it gets into the bloodstream. that's what this is about. if we catch it, we get busy surgically and excise it.

neil: if you, you get too late, you lose limbs. >> someone that has underlying problems that makes them unable to fight this off. this ain't going to spread all to florida. neil: far more serious. the ebola thing. just in that region, serious enough for liberia to close off borders? >> i'm one of the people downplaying these things, that's how i set up my credibility. i'm not downplaying this. this is the worst outbreak of ebola. a strain that's been around since 1976. but what's happening now -- neil: is it always fatal? >> a vast majority of the time. neil: no cure for it? >> no cure for it. there's a vaccine and anti-virals that look promising. what's bad about the bug, it fools the immune system into not responding to it. you get loaded with virus and can't fight it off. neil: how do you catch it? >> not through the air.

that's a key point for people traveling on planes. if you are traveling to this region, you have to have close contact. that's why physician are getting it. they're working closely with the patients. we here in the united states are used to the aids epidemic, you've got to wear gloves all the time. neil: sneezing or coughing, that's when it gets to be a problem. >> not going to be a problem. you're not going to get it from sneezing and coughing. neil: even if you are next to them? >> if you are sitting next to somebody with ebola and vomiting and diarrhea and they wipe their arm on the arm rest, you could get it that way. neil: you don't she as a contagion. >> no, if a case comes to the u.s., we're going to isolate it right away. hillary clinton was asked a million-dollar question, her not so million dollar answer. >> do you know your net worth? >> do you know your net worth? how much when folks think about what they get from alaska,

they think salmon and energy. but the energy bp produces up here creates something else as well: jobs all over america. engineering and innovation jobs. advanced safety systems & technology. shipping and manufacturing. across the united states, bp supports more than a quarter million jobs. when we set up operation in one part of the country, people in other parts go to work. that's not a coincidence. it's one more part of our commitment to america.

. neil: all right, in our biz blitz, time to blitz the rich. illinois governor pat quinn adding a millionaire's tax to the ballot in november to encourage democrats -- it would discourage a lot of folks. encourage democrats to vote. a 3% surtax for millionaires. he said he would take it all back in a few years, and rescind it. i don't know taxes that are rescinded once they're in place. what do you think of that? >> in politics, temporary means permanent. and the only time it hasn't was in new jersey with chris christie forcibly took the tax

and rolled it back and beat the legislature when they tried to veto it. but this is just illinois going down the california grease trail, you take the word grease and translate it, you get illinois, and they have wrecked their pension system, driving businesses out of state and come up with the incentives to keep big businesses in while driving small businesses out. it's a treadmill, and the people of illinois are losing, which is why i think quinn is in big trouble. neil: they're not all that fair from detroit. you certainly realize what's going on there to not repeat the sins and wake up and address your unfunded pension liability, but i guess not? >> there's a reason they don't have to. the democrats have a supermajority in the legislature. they have the suffering economy as steve said, they're struggling through that. how do they improve chances this fall but to mobilize the base around this falsehood that started in 2012.

part of this is the state parties are pulling the obama campaign playbook and deciding our economy is a wreck, how do we rally the troops. neil: i find it interesting how creative the left can be when it comes to raising money, not creative when it comes to reining it in, the tax on the millionaires, been there done that, and big success with that. in maryland, it raised less revenue. where is all of this going? >> well, it's a nonbinding referendum question, it's a political stunt more than anything else. more like a public poll question. i wonder if the referendum question includes sometimes small businesses are subject to individual tax codes. question is do you understand tax policy? when you tax something, you get fewer millionaires? fewer small businesses?

less income when you tax income. raising income tax is a bad move and states do so at their own risk. neil: another issue, hillary clinton is so rich she can't even count. take a look. >> do you know your net worth? how much money you have? >> you know, within a range, yeah, we have two very nice houses, which we're very proud of, and not selling any time soon. >> so millions? >> yes, yes, indeed. neil: not everyone knows their net worth. so i'm going to give hillary clinton a pass or keeping track of her homes. i wish the media would have given the same bath to john mccain when he flood on the number of homes he had or mitt romney but it's a clear double standard when it comes to wealth and politicians running for office. be consistent and threat all pass or give them all a hard time? >> i totally agree. when it comes to hillary

clinton's wealth, i wish her the best. you have two houses, good for you. being rich or poor doesn't make you a good leader. we have the identity politics from the left where they believe wealth is the result of luck or having good chance in your life. the alternative is success is earned. when you believe that success is earned, you don't want to redistribute it to other people. those are two different views, they are very distinct. the left gives their own rich people a pass. neil: why is that steve? >> they have the right views, it comes down to that. if you're liberal it shows you may be rich but enlightened, you are out to help the people. neil: they have some of the richest candidates in the white house. john kennedy, franklin roosevelt, but they were cool? >> they were there allegedly to help the people. if you are conservative and have policies as reagan did to help the people, you are greedy, selfish, out to exploit the working class. neil: i'm wondering the way we

caricature this, mark, rich republican guys are all about that monopoly dude, and the rich democratic guys are all but saints, why? >> well, because it worked in 2012, now this is just an extension. neil: didn't romney make it almost too easy. no one looked into the remark and said forget about groups offended. how did it get to the point of 47% americans were not paying income taxes? never let it get that far. >> consumers and producers, as americans we should celebrate the clinton's wealth. that's a great story. neil: i wouldn't want to become president so i could accumulate the wealth they leverage. >> they should come out of closet as very rich americans. in fact, i'll bet you they secretly read the "wall street journal" and "forbes" magazine in the dark with the flashlight. neil: i can see forbes, not the

journal. >> steve's point about democrats and how they're supposed to be appearing with the common man, she's in conflict and hasn't worked it out in the way she answered that question. neil: class warfare, it must poll well. because they keep going back to it. >> well, when you have a struggling economy, you get envy and you try to stoke envy. we saw that in the 30s and the 1970s. when you have a good economy. neil: somebody can you point a finger at. >> scapegoating. when you have weak money, high taxes, you have to blame somebody. we saw it in germany and other countries. this guy is exacerbating. making worse the social divisions. 1% of 99, and that's the only way they can win. it's not prosperity they can win by. neil: hadley, the irony is the gap between the rich and the poor, the president has been bemoaning it every day, every

hour of his presidency. >> another famous, well-spoken and right-thinking female politician margaret thatcher did the best job of explaining this ever, you'd rather the gap were wider and people were all worse off, you'd rather the gap were smaller and people were all worse off than recognize people are in charge of their own destinies, and as long as we give people equal opportunity, it's not a fixed economy. we can see more economic growth and prosperity and wealth for everyone. i would commend margaret thatcher, all of her ideas to any politicians that follow in the united states, but hillary clinton, clearly, was not responding to. where was the occupy wall street movement when they were condemning the 1 percenters, they're not condemning hillary here. she has a long way to go in terms of talking about her own wealth -- >> it won't be an issue. >> huge opportunity for republicans. talk about reaganesque growth instead of trying to play to

the division's middle class and all that warfare. neil: proactively and with a smile. guys, thank you very much. neil, what is the deal with mcdonald's? maybe my own trump card, after this. >> neil, you're a very talented, very special guy. and i mean it. dentures are very different to real teeth. they're about 10 times softer and may have surface pores where bacteria can multiply. polident kills 99.99% of odor causing bacteria and helps dissolve stains. that's why i recommend polident. [ male announcer ] cleaner, fresher, brighter every day.

we're changing the way we do , business, with startup ny. we've created tax free zones throughout the state. and startup ny companies will be investing hundreds of millions of dollars in jobs and infrastructure. thanks to startup ny, businesses can operate tax free for 10 years. no property tax. no business tax. and no sales tax. which means more growth for your business, and more jobs. it's not just business as usual. see how new york can help your business grow, at startup.ny.gov my motheit's delicious. toffee in the world. so now we've turned her toffee into a business.

my goal was to take an idea and make it happen. i'm janet long and i formed my toffee company through legalzoom. i never really thought i would make money doing what i love. we created legalzoom to help people start their business and launch their dreams. go to legalzoom.com today and make your business dream a reality. at legalzoom.com we put the law on your side. crestor lowered bad cholesterol in it's a fact. high-risk patients more than lipitor. bad cholesterol... you're goyeah!own! lowering cholesterol is a big deal, especially if you have high cholesterol plus any of these risk factors, because you could be at increased risk for plaque buildup in your arteries over time. so, when diet and exercise aren't enough to lower cholesterol, adding crestor can help. i'm down with crestor! crestor is not right for everyone, like people with liver disease or women who are nursing, pregnant, or may become pregnant.

tell your doctor about other medicines you're taking. call your doctor right away if you have muscle pain or weakness, feel unusually tired; have loss of appetite, upper belly pain, dark urine or yellowing of skin or eyes. these could be signs of rare but serious side effects. are you down with crestor!? ask your doctor if crestor could help you. if you can't afford your medication, astrazeneca may be able to help. neil: what neil: what is the deal with ill lists protesting outside of the white house, they were not even arrested. >> i'm with you all the way, the wore has become insane, what was wrong is now right, and what is

right is now wrong. >> made me feel like i was standing on my head. >> every u.s. citizen has a constitutional right to make a citizen's arrest for obvious criminal activity, if i lived in dc i would take a police men collectly to one of those illegal aliens, and demand their roast,. neil: good luck on that one. dozens of police were there and just watched, as were a bunch of immigration officials. >> to be protesting in front of our white house for rights they have no right to. this is maddening. taylor, my god, cavuto, what is next putting mindless idiots on tv to read a prompter and sell themselves off as anchor men? wait a minute! mr. cavuto, i agree, what happened to deep

love and sacred borders, did my father fight for this disregard of our laws. i am betting he did not, that is that is a very good points. >> how many illegal aliens is enough? really, how many? stacey. >> so all illegal kids who can't speak english will be enrolled in our schools, how does that help our english-speaking kids who are no not getting adequate education in our cities? where did they get the plenty to pay for -- where did they get the money to pay for t-shirts and printed signs? neil: you never i didn't think about that, that is a good points. >> have governors of california, california, new mexico and texas

texas, round them up, ship them on washington, d.c. >> gracey in florida, everyone is forgeting about the kids without parents to guide them, usually end up committing crimes is that future for these illegals in we cannot afford them, virginia in texas think thiss we should come down, let's use a moral compass. love your neighbor as yourself. that of just one guy, we're talking millions of illegals, and the sa samaritans here, wel, we are broke. >> send neil cavuto to the border so illegal aliens can trachshelter from the sun under

its head. oh, that is witty. we need you to run for president for 2016, we can smell canolli grassroots convergeing, we love cavuto, i tell you what, america all eat well. >> beverly, i love the truth you speak, can't wait for your show each day, we need more enlighteneed voices like yours n this dark world. i agree with that. i am sheer is serve man, and woman, that dude has a headline on too. and way, what is deal, with fox business' janna interviewing a fan of mine? look at what happened pop up on fox business. >> the donald had a message for our own neil cavuto. >> neil you are a very talented very special guy, and i mean it. >> he is.

>> what more can i say. billionaires love me too. i am here to serve you, and them. thank you donald. thank you all. see you tomorrow. kennedy: there are flaring border crises in southwest, and middle east no matter how desperate president wants to polish up another nobel peace prize he can't help but step in turd covered landmines. he can't seem to a landing. rice is suss fened from nfl, and from all. impeachmen