Skip to main content

tv   Cashin In  FOX Business  October 19, 2014 3:30am-4:01am EDT

3:30 am
prices. >> no way. hasn't moved in three years. this stock is stuck where it was in 2012. >> contrarian notions today. thank you. that's it for "forbes on fox." thank you for watching. have a wonderful weekend. keep it right here.the number o continues with "cashin' in" and eric bolling. controlling the contagion as ebola scares keep popping up in america. a majority of americans want to ban flights from the ebola breakout zone, since we can't trust our government to do it or anything, we the people are starting to take matters into our own hands. plus -- >> higher education shouldn't be a privilege for those able to afford it. >> now hillary to hypocrite. mrs. clinton raking in a cool $225 grand for a college speech about, wait for it, soaring college tuition. making it obvious. the president's hopeful drowning in hypocrisy and then -- >> a tree fell on blake abbot.
3:31 am
he sued and got millions. since then, he spent hits career working against other victims. >> hitting a new low with this wheelchair attack ad. politicians going to extremes to get your vote. but, will they be the ones "cashin' in" starts right now. hi, everyone. i'm eric bolling. welcome to "cashin' in." our crew this week, wayne rogers, jonathan, michelle and my buddy from "the five." the ebola show on capitol hill shedding light on how much the people in charge don't know. take a listen and try to remain calm. >> doctor frieden, how many non-u.s. military flights, commercial flights, are currently going into the affected countries? >> i don't have the exact numbers. >> reporter: does anyone on the panel know how many commercial flights are going into these areas? >> that was thursday. get this. we here at "cashin' in" debating a travel ban for weeks. why are they now just getting
3:32 am
around to debating the merits of a travel ban? government incompetence at its worse and this time could be deadly. michelle, those watching "cashin' in," in charge, maybe we'd be safer? >> we should be proactive in our response to ebola and instead, reactive. i don't understand why the travel ban wasn't implemented right away. what we should be doing, banning anyone who comes into this country that originates from a country that is affected by ebola, and do this until they get the virus under control in those areas. it's common sense. >> it is common sense, but, bob, there's a lot of panic and concern in america right now about ebola. every time you turn on the tv, there's a doctor giving a press conference. is it the concern about dying from ebola that's worrying americans or the concern that they just don't have our backs in d.c. that they're not competent and makes this up as they go along? >> let me say one of the reasons, turn on shows like this, and our show and we keep talking about this stuff.
3:33 am
there are 318 million in this country. 3 have had ebola. having said that, i don't think a travel ban will affect the medical aspect, but i would do it to cover myself politically. god help you. one gets through, you'll be ravaged. i'd do it for that. >> if one? how about 50? 150 people coming from these countries every day landing in america. you know, 21-day incubation period, you're not sure who has it and who doesn't. john, to you. talk about a travel ban hurting the african countries that were banning travel to and from. how about hurting americans if some of those people come here and spread the disease? >> well, you know, eric, there's a difference between possibility and probability. i think bob actually make as prudent point here. in a nation of 300-plus million people, talking .00001% that have even been affected by ebola. there is a lot of fear out there, but fear and emotions are
3:34 am
not tools of cognition and when people take a step back and realize the countries most affected are those with terrible medical care and this is, from my perspective, at least, not spreading as fast as a lot of folks in the media would have you believe. >> all right. so, wayne, there are people who have had -- have actually gone on tv saying a travel ban would be quote/unquote race it. zambia, south africa, certain restrictions to and from these stricken once. other countries have border closings and various levels of border closings. how in the world can that be called racist, if country within the same continent are banning travel? >> well, eric, we all know all of those countries are racist. everybody knows that. they're all racists. of course they are. please, give me a break. i've been talking about this for a month now. every death is worth -- you're trying to save a life here. this is not measles. this is something that will kill
3:35 am
you. we know if you read the hot zone, any of those books that talk about ebola and marberg, this is lethal stuff. we have no way. the best thing, quarantine the people who come into the country if the they've been in one of those country, through paris from one of those countries, quarantine them the 21 days. that's just automatic. not to do that is stupid. to ban people coming from the country is also a mandatory thing. you've got to do it. >> michelle, talk about the 3,900, 3,900 u.s. troops that will go to these countries and start helping, assist these countries with ebola. we now know how easy it is to catch it. a nurse touches her face, she catches ebola. in spain, some of the two nurses here, not sure exactly how much contact they had with the bodily fluids. they caught ebola. are we smart to send our military to fight this disease there? >> i don't think it's their job.
3:36 am
i don't think it's the job of the u.s. miller to to do this. it's great for humanitarians to go over but not sending troops there. we should send troops to fight isis, not to fight ebola. look, this is a very serious disease. people can come here and have ebola, not have symptoms for 21 days. they come here. they infect our hospitals, nurses, doctors. it's a very serious issue, and more than majority of americans want a travel ban. >> john? >> if they want a travel ban, how come the corporations, michelle, that those americans own haven't instituted a travel ban? how they vote on a survey and act in real life is oftentimes very different. >> because -- >> all the fear out there, a lot of people -- >> they're -- >> wayne, a much more degenerate idea of mankind. people are separaty smart and don't see ebola. >> they don't want to take a risk, jonathan. >> i would -- >> this is a very deadly disease. >> i wouldn't vacation in sierra leone, either, but --
3:37 am
>> jonathan, we're not only talking about going there. we're talking about coming here. should there not be a ban. >> yes. >> with anyone from one of these three major outbreak countries on their pass port or traveling through this, those countries, they should not be -- just not allowed. don't even bring them here. forget 94% will stop. how about 100% of them we stop? >> well, eric, unfortunately, to your point, you don't know exactly who's coming across the border with these diseases, but we're talking about literally under, from my understanding 2, -- 250 a day that can be screened, assessed. the whole notion to copy what other countries are doing, well, this one is doing it, we're all for american exceptionism sometimes but when it comes to following our paths and issue, shut the door. >> let me comment. the fastest way to end this thing is contain it where it is. and hopefully -- >> exactly. >> it will get done. >> yeah. >> the 3,900 u.s. troops are trained medics, most of them. there to try to help contain
3:38 am
this thing, which is the best thing that could happen to america. i mean, i think frankly, ebola getting in here widespread is much more dangerous than isis. >> one issue, bob. we're kenned, the cdc director literally said we're worried about the economies of the countries that have outbreaks of ebola. we're worried about stabilizing those economies. are you kidding me? forget those countries. their job is to stabilize americans. >> that comment, although the american economy is booming now, but -- >> no, no. not talking about the economy. making sure americans are safe. forget the african economies. the cdc's job is to worry about american lives. >> and -- >> go ahead. >> most americans are taking reasonable steps. it's terrible that president obama would send americans in there's for these humanitarian purposes in africa. to your point, lack of sanitary medical care, it's their fault. americans are not sacrificing
3:39 am
for the third world. >> this is -- tony, roll the picture of the "daily news" i believe on thursday. look at this cover. bob, react to this. even a liberal newspaper says, for god's sake, get a grip, with president obama's picture on it. and guess how president obama got a sgrgrip? appointed ron klain. a lawyer and democrat operative, not a doctor, the czar of ebola. >> exactly what this government need, not another doctor. >> organized on -- >> let me finish, please. one question at a time. he's a very good organizer. you don't need -- the last thing you want is a doctor on top of something like this. >> i think the first thing you want is a doctor. >> no. >> a give last word before we go. go ahead. >> look, i think we have enough community organizers. we saw what happened when we got one in the white house. hasn't actually panned out. so i think we should have a doctor in charge of this, not another organizer. >> leave it on that. leave it right there. but, "cashin' in," #cashin,
3:40 am
the number of hash tags soaring above all other shows last saturday and tbbh tweets this -- number one, the cdc incompetence. two, obama administration, incompetent. three, travel ban. great idea. one out of three better than zero. join the crew add hash tag to all your tweets. i just tweeted this picture. thanks cdc. is kniss othis in our near futu coming up, is hillary clinton cashing in on rising education costs and it will leave you speechless. >> millions of other young people are burdened by student debt that can feel like an anchor tied to their feet, dragging them down.
3:41 am
3:42 am
3:43 am
3:44 am
higher education shouldn't be a privilege for those able to afford it. it should be -- [ applause ] -- an opportunity widely available for anyone with the talent, determination and
3:45 am
ambition to learn. >> ruh-roh. maybe not such a burden if you didn't get $225 grand for a speech you just gave. michelle, mrs. clinton, speaking about the cost of education. are you kidding me? >> look, i don't care if people make money, but don't make money and then pretend that you care about the high cost of tuition and then charge a school $225,000 to speak. i mean, this is the epitome of has ko hypocrisy. this family said they can dead broke and daughter chelsea can't care about money. tried so hard, but can't. yet spends $10 million in an apartment in manhattan. the whole family is hip kr hypocritical. >> we understand the $225,000 doesn't come out of the coffers. why doesn't she donate the money back to the school?
3:46 am
>> first of all, height of has pohas -- hypocrisy is you two. took it out of a foundation -- the impression, clearly. >> that's money that could have gone to the school. >> sure, could have. yeah, that's fine. see republicans give up that kind of money. the fact is the two clinton donors gave that money and going to the clinton trust that does a lot of good works. >> oh -- >> wait. >> their pockets. >> did you say go to charity through the clinton trust? good lord. >> they do a good job in a lot of things. if i were doing this i would not give a speech, at that speech. i wouldn't have done at a college. >> wayne, your thoughts on this one? >> well, i don't blame hillary at all. she's got price. says, hey, i'm out here giving speeches. pay me the 225, pay me. the morons in this operation of the people who agreed to pay
3:47 am
her. that's just dumb. i don't care wen ter cahether i from -- they are people connected to the college. these are people who are a part -- could you let me finish? why do you feel this necessity to constantly interrupt. >> get to the point. >> just shut up and we will. you know? stop it. now, if they make that decision, they're the people who are responsible and those are the people you should be criticizing. not hillary. >> go ahead, john. >> well, i don't mind she makes money. what is frustrating is that the reason she can make $225,000 a year, eric, because she is political. politics are her own, her whole reason, you know, detra. it's what she does and what makes college so expensive isn't the fact she makes $225,000 for a speech, the policy she advocates. more government control in education has made tuition price goes up and will continue to make them go up. >> we've got to go. a good one coming up. being called the nastiest, maybe the costliest campaign ad's in
3:48 am
2014 election. a democrat using an empty wheelchair to attack handicapped opponent. is that going too far? is it ever worth it?
3:49 am
3:50 am
3:51 am
isis. oliver north will be joining us to weigh in. all that coming up at noon. join us. democrat wendy davis accused of staffing to new lows against her republican opponent in the texas governors race.
3:52 am
here's her new ad. >> a tree fell on greg abbott. he sued and got millions. he spent his career working against other victims. >> bob, i'll throw it right to you, the democratic operative. bad idea, good idea, this? >> it's true, even though it's great hypocrisy at an all-time high. when i started in the campaign business, it was 20% of our ads were negative, 80% positive. by the time i left, it was the reverse. they work. negative ads work. >> there's a line you can't cross. >> yeah, sure. >> your thoughts, wayne, on negative attack ads? >> well, i bow to bob in this instance. he's the expert in this area. he's done this, i haven't. i would agree that if -- particularly if you're behind, you take a shot, you take your best shot. you got to do something. you take your best shot. a lot of times, they don't work. they backfire on you. then you turn around and do a
3:53 am
new strategy. >> you mean he's lost elections before, i wasn't exactly sure. >> 86% win rate. i don't know how you do for your customers but i did 86. >> better than that. what is an attack ad? speech is speech. it really lets you see these candidates, their characters. i thought this ad was reprehensib reprehensible. would turn me off as a voter rather than turn me on. >> political ads are fine if you're raising a legitimate concern. but this ad was disguised as a political attack ad. when really it was a person attack ad. before this ad, wendy davis was still going to lose and known as the woman in texas who lost. now she's going to be known as the woman who lost and made fun of a guy in a wheelchair. >> give bob 30 seconds to rebut. >> made fun of a guy in a
3:54 am
wheelchair who cashed in $70 million on a claim and then stopped anybody else from getting a claim. if they want him as governor, fine, let them just go -- >> i thought you were going to take a shot but you stayed on topic. we appreciate that. coming up, wake up, america, the presisisisisi go ahead and put your bag right here. have a nice flight! traveling can feel like one big mystery. you're never quite sure what is coming your way. but when you've got an entire company who knows that the most on-time flights are nothing if we can't get your things there too. it's no wonder more people choose delta
3:55 am
than any other airline.
3:56 am
announcer: this is why you get by on 4 hours' sleep... why you took a second job. this is why you taught yourself how to fix the plumbing... and spend hours juggling the bills. this is why you'll do whatever it takes to keep your home, and that is why we want to help. we are making home affordable, a free government resource that can make paying the mortgage easier. now more options are available. call 888-995-hope to talk one on one with a housing expert today.
3:57 am
i want to say thanks to our
3:58 am
crew for joining us this week. you can head over to foxnews.com/cashingin to see stock picks. time to wake up, america. a president's job is tough. he or she should, a, keep us safe, b, assure a healthy environment. c, do everything possible to provide economic opportunity and, d, keep america strong in the eyes of the world. so how is president obama doing so far? are we more likely to contract a de deadly disease now or six years ago? ebola says more. are we more likely to be beheaded or blown up on our way to work by a fanatical group now or six years ago? isis says now. has your household worth gone up? no. are there more americans on food stamps? yes. friendly business overseas? and has american conceptualism that built the strongest nation on the planet grown stronger or weaker in the last six years?
3:59 am
the answer sadly is weaker. by all accounts, president obama's six years in the white house have been a colossal failure. america's weaker. america's poorer. america's less safe. america is under greater threat of deadly disease. i challenge the left to dispute any of these. nobel prize winner paul krugman called president obama the most influential president in history. krugman may be right, if you count driving a once great economic global power into a fiscal economic foreign policy and domestic policy ditch influential, then yes, perhaps president obama is. think about it. wake up, america. we're not better off under liberal progressive policies but we can be great again. free up the free market. capitalize on capitalism. liberate constitutional liberty. there's only one way to get america out of the liberal gutter they've driven us into. you got to vote out the liberal progressive, and vote in free market capitalism. you got to vote though, folks.
4:00 am
by the way, don't complain unless you vote. have a great weekend, everybody portions decrease. what's coming up? >> "the willis report." gerri: hello, everybody. i'm gerri willis. welcome to a special edition of "the willis report." over the next hour, we're taking an in-depth look at ebola and how you and your family can stay safe. get you caught up on the latest headlines first. the caribbean cruise ship carrying a dallas health care worker is headed back to texas after being turned away in mexico. the passenger has not shown symptoms for 19 days and voluntarily self-quarantined on the ship. no way to know when the second texas nurse truly began illness. after word from the cdc that she felt funny during weekend in ohio. they can't rule out possibility she's been contagious

126 Views

info Stream Only

Uploaded by TV Archive on