we thank you for being with us. stay tuned for cavuto coming up here next. see you tomorrow. good night from new york. neil: hey, did i tell you about all the great holiday sales? now, if you could only get to the stores to enjoy them. i'm neil cavuto. and shop till you're blocked. protesters blocking roads, tunnels, and, yes, malls in new york city. of course, those protesters have rights, but not when they start trampling on everyone else's. reverend, good to have you. >> thank you. neil: what do you think what happened in new york. it was much more peaceful. of a more diverse crowd than the one we saw in ferguson, but it was a disruptive crowd. >> you know, when i saw the crowd, i automatically thought of occupy wall street and i

thought of anonymous and communist party, how they had organized this rally under the pretense that they were doing it because of bad cops or racial -- or racist cops, when really they're using garner and other situations for their own personal gain. these people disrupted businesses. we have people coming in from around the world this time of year, shopping and tourists looking around. and their young kids are hearing these people curse and say bad words. they're trying to go after the so-called 1 percenters. they want to hurt big businesses. i think they're taking advantage of the michael brown and other situations, eric garner for their own personal gain. it's not about eric garner or michael brown in this particular case. lou: i'm curious how you distinguish between the ferguson

grand jury non--indictment and the new york non-indictment. in both cases, the attorney general has promised a federal probe. in each case. what do you think? >> yeah. (?) you know, the one thing i know for a fact. this is not about race. it has nothing to do with officers or a police officer being racist. it's just that they're injecting that because that's what liberals do what they do when they want what they want. it's unfortunate that eric garner died, you know. but you still have to consider, he resisted arrest at the time. they tried to get him to allow to put handcuffs on. he refused to do it. i don't think when they took him down the plan was to kill him. lou: no. i agree. here's where i'll disagree. and i admire the heck out of you. and how brave you are because you say things in the face of public sentiment that says the opposite. in garner's case i feel

sympathy because he said i can't breathe. i can't breathe. the officer didn't know he would kill the guy. but what's done is done. there was a legal justification from some lawyers i've talked to. none of the men died. so i can't trust them, reverend. but they all said to a t, if there were ever grounds for indictment, that was the case for it. but it's done and over with. i'm wondering what happens now and whether the federal government, washington, just makes a bad thing even worse. >> yes. i agree with that. that's what's going on. but also, neil, i was told there was a black female sergeant there who was watching the whole thing. she was observing this whole thing as it was going down. neil: you're right. she was among the six. >> and if she was there

observing what was happening, had this guy, the officer intentionally was going after mr. garner personally, she would not have approved of it. apparently, she thought everything was fine. also on the grand jury, they say there were five -- at least five black people who heard the evidence and saw the evidence. apparently, they didn't see any problem with what the officer had done. i was watching the video, and i couldn't quite tell that when the officer had his arm around mr. garner's neck, was it the front throat or just around the side of the man? neil: i just when i hear the guy saying at least a dozen times i can't breathe, i can't breathe -- but i don't. and you know the grand jury had a lot more information than i did. i went to end on this note that i began, that is the protesters, and you had said prior the ferguson protesters had the right to protest. that's american. that's what we do.

i think you said, i don't want to take words of context, when it gets violent, it's a whole other deal. what about when they're blocking entrances to subway stations or to stores? does that -- >> well, they don't have a right -- that's right. they don't have a right to do that, neil. they should go to the parks. do what martin lutheran martin r did protest peacefully. not interrupt drivers. shut down freeways or prevent regular folks or citizens from going to and from their businesses and taking care of their day. it's wrong when they do that. that's when they're out of control. as i said, this is happening because they want to go after big businesses. i want to add one other quick thing. when the mayor of new york inserted race in this incident, it just -- it threw m me off. this is absolutely

insane. first of all, it had nothing to do with race. all it will do is encourage anger in the black community. secondly, you have the mayor of the city turning on his employees. it's like your boss is turning against you. i think the mayor owes the police department there a public apology for turning on them in this manner. neil: reverend, here's where i can offer you advice: don't wait for that. it's always good having you, my friend. and we very much appreciate your guts and your wisdom. thank you, reverend. >> thank you very much. thank you. neil: meanwhile, those ferguson protesters may be up for time's people of the year. what about the people trying to clean up the mess they made. no time covers for them, but i'm nominating the crowd funding just the same because they're trying to help them. these guys, most of them out of town business guys see the distraction

and want to help those small businesses rebuild. crowd building expert callahan, those helping to rebuild ferguson should be the ones we recognize. never ever forget. you know, it's an interesting point, john callahan, if you think about it, and i had an african-american on who supported those protests and couldn't understand why they burnt down her business. >> well, it really is a tragedy, neil, that people who are trying to defend their community result in -- take actions that just undermine it. that the small businesses that are destroyed are often the soul of those communities. neil: what can we do to help? i know you are helping because insurance doesn't cover this. you're not covered for riots. i had no idea. there are things that can be done. these people are trying to do that. they're not even from the area. right?

>> one of the things that's encouraging is the development of charity sights. sites. we've had civil unrest before. we have the internet now though. now we have sites that have been established to aid food banks. neil: it's immediate. >> it is. and that's a real departure from the past. it's more inclusive. people from all around the country who see this who have access to information they didn't have before are now participating and helping out people in need. and so that's the -- the big advance so far. neil: by the way, half the businesses that were destroyed were owned by african-americans. isn't that amazing? >> it's a tragedy. imagine how they feel, that they -- neil: i mentioned -- i didn't mean to interrupt you. she supported their cause. she thought the grand jury decision was a travesty, but she was still scratching her head, that poor woman, and saying, hey, hello.

>> we have to remember that this is all about rage. and rage is irrational, and it doesn't necessarily have moral content. and so that's being ignored in the actions. but the aftermath is real and affects a lot of people in need. you have people who own these businesses. you have people who work for the businesses. and people who are consumers there. neil: you're right. >> the whole security is disrupted. neil: you're right. and they're thinking twice about staying in that community. john callahan. thank you very much. very good seeing you. go to facebook.com/teamcavuto. tell me what you think about donating those who need the recognizing and citing them especially. not the protesters, but those who are dealing with the fallout. the fox biz alert. you might want to enjoy those gas prices while you can.

washington talking about bumping the federal tax. a surprise that's probably not a surprise to this democratic congressman leading the charge. i wonder if he has any better answer to where all the gas taxes have been going. since he told me this. >> independent study from business, from republican -- neil: you have no idea, do you? you have no idea. >> i think you don't have -- you purposely don't have an idea. neil: i love this a lot. and i get the same answer. >> thanks for your time.

neil: be aware with congressmen with bikes on their lapel. pretty soon they're pedaling their tax ideas everywhere.

they're talking about raising the gas tax. do that, you could jeopardize this entire recovery. nevertheless, that's what they're thinking of doing. what do you make of that. >> well, i think it's a couple of things. the politicians are looking at the fact that gas prices are coming down. they're thinking, hey, why don't we get the benefit of this instead of consumers. we'll replace the higher energy prices with higher gas prices and maybe consumers won't notice the difference. neil: they say they won't because even if it were pushed up a dime, 15, even 20 cents, i can't believe those figures, but we're still down, you know, close to a buck in the last 14 months. what do you say? >> maybe so. but why is it that politicians should get the benefit of that extra dime, 15 cents, 20 cents, particularly when what we should be doing on transportation issues is taking the power away from washington, going back to state and local

governments. different states like michigan and others have raised gas prices because they've decided that they have transportation needs they want to fund. maybe i would have liked those plans. maybe i wouldn't have. but at least they're paying for their own improvements. when you do those things in washington, you get the infamous bridges to nowhere. you have the leaky bucket taking money from the states all the way to the washington then out to favorite constituents. our founders had no conception of the idea that washington would be in charge of roads around the country. neil: i don't know. benjamin franklin was in favor of a gas tax. just made that up. you had no idea there would even be a need for gas or cars. dan, thank you very much. no matter, the president is behind this move

because our crumbling roads and bridges need it right now. that is assuming the money goes to those crumbling roads and bridges. and mark, i guess that's a big assumption. so, mark, first off, you're worried. >> so this is sort of the shuffle. if you take a look at the stimulus package from 2009, it was $1,819,000,000,000. only 4 percent went to construction. neil: where did the rest go? >> that's to solyndra. $54 billion. neil: wasn't it sold as infrastructure? >> it was all sold as infrastructure. we all bought into it. neil: not this guy. >> but everybody else fell for it. added $1,800,000,000,000. the president is setting us up. when he discusses tax cuts. okay we have to spend a lot more money on

infrastructure. neil: you read my mind. i think this will be part of a deal that i'm all for reforming the tax code, tracy. but you've got to agree to a hike in the gas tax. i could see a number of republicans who would go along with it. >> money management has not been a trait we've seen possibly out of washington. anybody know where their social security is? there's a list. a million dollars spent on a fruit fly sexual attractiveness study. that's important news, isn't it? neil: fruit fly says, i'm so not interested. >> that's right. neil: oh, my god. >> this is what they do down there. they waste our money. he probably is coming to the table because he has nothing better to lose. neil: that is a good point. >> where's the money that was allocated. neil: i said, i'm okay with the higher gas.

if you want to go in that direction. first of all, tell me you've spent everything and then some on what you said you would and then some. i won't be happy, but i'll give you more money. >> that doesn't seem to have happened. neil: and it won't. the congressman with the bicycle on the lapel won't be afraid. he just couldn't explain where that money went. >> imagine individual investors, imagine individual people do that in america. they would be bankrupt. more accountability. neil: what if they proved to you, i can account for all that money, it's exhausted it went to roads and bridges. we exhausted it. >> let's wait for that to happen. >> no way. we cannot support any additional tax. we can't. neil: you never do. >> of course. especially after the republicans took the senate a month ago. neil: they shouldn't be caving on something as silly as this. >> the gas tax will kill the middle class again.

neil: the middle class can afford it. >> no. they cannot afford it. you buy a gallon of milk. can't afford it. >> you want to know more about the fruit fly. i can see it in your eyes. and how did they test it? >> that's important research, probably going back to your congressional district. >> i don't think anyone -- neil: the research is is there back to the fruit flies. >> maybe they can fix it. i don't know. let's find a way. neil: what is the difference between demanding more money and demanding more protests? what if i told you nothing. nothing. you, me.

neil: all right. brace yourself, america. it is time for neil's spiel. the most talked about minute now in broadcasting. okay. i made that up. anyway, i'm not making this up. tonight, more like describing how two different things are the same. demanding justice from washington and more money from us, out of washington. attorney general eric holder already promising a federal probe into that new york grand jury non-indictment just like he has in that ferguson

non-indictment. just like the president has thrown his support over a gas tax because it's long overd overdue. proper justice in both communities is long overdue, he says. says who? you, attorney general because he didn't like the decision that two law-abiding gran grand juries weren't good enough. you, mr. president, because you don't like the billions of dollars washington is already getting off the gas tax we already have. i just say enough. enough with saying you know better. enough with big footing communities that have been through with so much. enough with denying the brief respite from gas prices we've been enjoying. enough with taking things and saying it's for their own good. that's why you're demanding. enough with saying you've had enough of communities that clearly don't get it.

and the rest of us that don't see the wisdom of paying more for a tank of gas. you are full of it. keeping calm, yet only inciting more violence. the lies over a health care bill that would save us money, but would only break the bank. quick breaking our chops by first closing yours because you don't have to be a shrink to see that you are all skunks, which is why i brought a shrink here. and she's not a skunk. he's the real deal. unlike me who reads a promter. dr. luddberg. she has a message. you have to go slow with this stuff. >> absolutely. i think what's important for people to realize though, society is designed to get better and to self-correct. neil: what if it's not. the feds are arguing it's not doing that. >> i think it is. neil: i don't know. i heard mayor de blasio,

this is centuries in the making. >> well, when people have a problem with what's going on, it's great that they have a voice to share with the public. and so whenever we see people protesting, that is a form of self-correcting -- that is basically calling -- well, violence is not the next level. when people are angry, he want to be heard. if things aren't under control, it will get violent. because people want to get heard. they want change. neil: what about the vast majority that don't protest. they may be upset. but then for washington to step in for the attorney general to step in, plenty can argue with the grand juries in both cases. to say, you idiots didn't handle it well. we'll take over. or the federal gas tax, yeah, you know, whatever your views, you peons don't realize that we need this extra money so we'll just ram this on you.

>> well, i don't like when government amfantasy lieses people. that's not what government is there for. so it's always disturbing when the message is from government, you don't know what you're doing. they treat us like children, you don't know what you're doing. neil: that's my psychological read on this. and people will differ with me. and, by the way, i think there could be an argument made. the guy in new york should have been indicted. that's here nor there. this isn't what we like, we'll take over, the government. >> maybe there needs to be more transparency. a lot of people weren't comfortable with the grand jury's decision. neil: are you comfortable with washington getting involved? >> i think we need to understand there's a problem elsewhere. these are just symptoms. neil: these protesters are all -- the ones in new york, they'll be on the cover of time magazine, people of the year.

nothing against that, but what about everyone else who is calmly, desperately, flayingly going about their lives trying to do the you righthe rightthing for their ki. not cursing in public. >> everyone needs to be remind that it's important to own your own power and to make a difference where you can in the proper kind of way. neil: here my proper way. butt out. butt out. let us deal with it. we have a system for dealing with this. in new york, problems notwithstanding, it was dealt with in a legally constitutional way. some people, you may find it surprising, cursed at me apparently -- >> they cursed at you -- you should have called me about that. neil: those msnbcers outside. i can deal with the cursing. it's just when they throw things. >> it's when they start

acting violent when that's not okay. that creates more of a problem. neil: my spiel is -- my spiel is, let them do what they want unless it gets super, super violent. you federal government stay out of it. you incited it. >> if there are problems going on, let's figure out how to fix it so we can become better, stronger and people feel more empowered in general regardless of what side of the fence they are. neil: you sound so much like a shrink. >> i do. it's my training. i try to get out of it. it comes out all the time. neil: you're good. in the meantime, all you holiday travelers, you might want to stop complaining about checked bag fees. they could save your life. i'll tell you why

neil: holiday travelers, you might want to check this out. you could be forced to check your luggage.

they might ban all car-ons to prevent attacks this holiday season. bad guys are looking to do this during the christmas season to blow up from a couple to half a dozen passenger jets, doing just that. hodgeer says this would make travel messy, but it would be necessary. why? >> it depends upon what the threats are. we don't have specifics about this. neil: they seem to be saying carry-on. >> we're watching the bomb-making capabilities of areas like yemen. combine that with the isil fighters who have gone from europe, have gone over and gotten training. the concern in security forces has been that there will be this marriage between the bomb makers and the guys who travel back and forth who don't have any kind of security footprint. neil: wouldn't we check

carry-ons. you check in, but they generally scrutinize whatever you carry on the plane. >> the standards across the world aren't uniform. they have different levels. secondly, the real concern is non-fairris material. we can check your bulges. sometimes they'll do a swipe. they'll try to to see if there's residue in your bag. they're looking for the residue of any type of like a simtex or those kinds of devices. neil: stuff? plastic explosives do they check the luggage underneath? >> they have inline screening. they have better way of doing it. neil: flight 103. blew up over scotland. remember that case where that was the explosive. >> technology has changed dramatically. neil: what airports are safer?

>> i think the london heathrow is up. we always look at what's going on in places like spain or barcelona. neil: what about athens. i love the people there, but it seems kind of slip shot to me. >> you'll have different attention spans. you'll be ramping up and ramping down. and you don't have a consistency. what's key here -- neil: what about rome? they have experienced christmas attacks. >> they have. would i compare rome to london or jfk? no. i don't think they have the same type of -- neil: what if they're misleading us. watch your carry-ons. and, in fact, it won't be carry-ons. >> that's always a challenge. cartridge bombs. they put cartridges and sent it on a plane. take plastic explosives, put it in that. that's what we're worry about that. new ways.

that's the challenge here. neil: all right. thanks for freaking us out, michael. no, seriously, i appreciate it. all right. fed up, or should i say heads up when states take immigration matters into their own hands and out of the president's and get this, republican's hands. i think by first showing them the finger.

neil: you know, republicans may be trying to push off the immigration battle to next year. a number of states are saying to heck with it. we'll fight back right now. to fox business rich edson with the state by state revolt. >> seventeen of them suing the obama administration over its executive order of immigration. claiming it allows many illegals stay in the united states violates federal law. fifteen of the 17 states have republican governors. west virginia and montana have republican attorney general's. the filing claims quote,

this lawsuit is not about immigration. it's about the rule of law. presidential power, and the structure of the state constitution. they're directly at odds with the white house. >> they're saying it is not trying to fulfill the law of congress. instead he's trying to enact laws himself because congress will not act. (?) the president does not have that authority. the law here and precedent here is pretty clear. as it relates to the legal authority that the president invoked to carry out this -- the executive action he announced a couple of weeks ago. >> earlier this afternoon, the house approved a bill to block the president's immigration order. it heads to the senate where democrats can and likely will kill it. neil. neil: thank you very much. to rich's point. that could be the problem. the president can't be doing this. richard kelsy happy to see states taking things into their own hands.

the president says he can do this especially because congress hasn't done this. he's been waiting too long. you say no. >> it is as simple as that. he can't do it. he got a partisan political opinion. it's not a surprise. the constitution needs a pardon. it's the states that step up. the states have to show an injury and fact. let's face it, the cost of illegal immigration on our social services, on our small towns, on our educational system, on our criminal justice system has been remarkable. neil: they're not suing for money. they're suing to stop it. >> they're suing for a declarity judgment. they want the court to declare he's exseated his authority. and they're absolutely right about this. president has created a new law.

he set out a set of -- a set of criteria by which he's going to not only not enforce the law, but he'll give benefits and give rights to people who are not here legally. that he can't do under the constitution. neil: but should those state governors go slow if they know thethey may be reining in a pary in the future. let's say similar on taxes or whatever. what do you say? >> well, look, every president gets up and tries to figure out what the outer limits of his or her power is. but at some point. right? we have to stand up what those limits really are. whether you're a republican or democrat. the constitution only gives the president so much power. there's no way a president can stand up and make 5 million, 7 million, or 3 million people legal without going through the legislative process. he can't do it. there's a lot of opinions out there that is he can't.

but if you're a partisan for the constitution and you read it as it's written, you understand that, let's face it, prosecutorial discretion by the supreme court standard has to be a case-by-case analysis. there's no way he can make criteria that allows four to 5 million americans to become de facto citizens. neil: he's doing something of a larger magnitude. when they use orders of any sort, they argue, that they are -- they are legal, in that the president is doing it. in this case, they're addressing an urgent need. now, that's generally their application. you're saying this is different because it's so big. it involves so many, and it cuts to the core of our immigration laws. right? >> so it's not just the size. it is true it's big. it's not just the size. remember, his actions aren't tied to any piece of legislation that's been passed. if you pass any piece of

legislation, the administrative state for better or worst, has the right to interpret what the intent of that legislation is. and a lot of times executive orders are used to do that. this, this is no underlying legislation. he is creating a legislation. can't do it. neil: thank you very much. richard. in the meantime, forget the president's problem with republicans. it's his big problem with democrats that's got him scrambling. after this

neil: well, the president is also america's ceo. right about these days, he's looking kind of lonely. the biggest enactors of obamacare is backing away from obama. that's putting him under pressure. it's like in a business, when your own board members start turning on you. things can turn ugly and

fast. tracy, that's what's going on here. >> but the result won't the same. he got ousted. carroll, the board ousted her. american apparel, all these ceos got fired by their boards. it's not going to happen here. while everyone is turning on him, he'll ride the white house wave all the way to the end of his term. neil: but they are crippling how much of a successful ceo he'll be in the next two years. >> yes, because this is a swing vote strategy. if you're in the white house and you're playing defense, trying to protect obamacare, climate policy, you want to defend those so they're intact. the republicans want to pick off as many democrats as they can so they can override a veto. it's a defensive strategy. the president has to lure some swing vote democrats to stay with them. he'll use their force. the lincoln bedroom.

whatever tool he can to make sure they stay on base with him. it's a defensive strategy. neil: if you're looking at obamacare -- i used to think it was impossible to repeal this thing. now, i'm not so sure. you get enough of the unwilling democrats who are thinking to themselves they're not up for reelection this year, i could see cobbling a dozen, 15 members who say, no more than this. maybe that's something schumer is signaling. maybe that's what hearken is signaling. >> will they put their political capital and time into that? that's not what they're interested in doing. as a ceo, he has a tough job. every jo ceo does. ceos build coalitions. even though he has two years left, he still has time to build coalitions. neil: but he doesn't want to. he's burning bridges. >> if we're going to see real change, those

coalitions -- >> he only built a coalition once. that was with obamacare. it didn't have a single republican in that coalition. >> that's not a coalition then. >> the coalition of democrats. the caucus of democrats. neil: that coalition is turning on him. that's what, what i mean by them turning on him. >> they can strip out parts of obamacare. scared about their next election. >> you talked about jeff bezos yesterday of amazon apologizing. the president hasn't apologized. neil: he must be seeing that chuck schumer has his regrets. he must be seeing sibile, even though she called us idiots for not comprehending -- >> i really don't think he cares. >> that's just talk. >> he's vetoing everything. you have to do something or the american people will -- neil: you're very logical. >> the american public wants something to get done. we have to see something happen. >> he's only had two

vetoes. we'll see a lot more vetoes from him. neil: the pressure then is on him. he'll be the obstructionist. >> he will be. that's why schumer and others. it's just talk. they're protecting themselves. neil: businesses all, but giving up hope on the white house. we're hearing that more companies are feeling the use of executive power is making them feel powerless. on your point on both the left and right there's a feeling like, you have to cool it on this executive order stuff. >> exactly. this is the grim number. 770 days, the grim number that businesses have to look forward to -- to get through this administration. neil: you're a very hateful man if you're counting that. >> big ugly number. it's not as bad as the number of days we've had in this administration. neil: someone has anger management. >> but business, they're overregulated. still overtaxed. they won't get anywhere

with this administration. >> they want clarity. direction. they want to see what's going to happen with regulation. they don't want to operate when there's no visibility. they have lack of visibility. it's still impeding hiring. we have a lot of people working part-time who should be working full-time. >> everyone is on hold. they want a pro business president. these small businesses will muddle their way through the next few years. do nothing. not hire or expand. neil: i haven't heard a lot of the democrats -- quietly heard grumbling because they respect their independence and the differences between them, the houses of power. i hear it more from republicans. >> but, look, you have small businesses on both sides of the aisle and they're getting clobbered. the nsib has said time and time again, you're supposed to come to us for our approval before you pass all these regulations. all the epa rules. neil: and the latest on

overtime. >> it's crippling them they're job creators. >> a survey showed 50 percent of the members of this group believed this white house is not friendly to their interests. only 1 percent said they believed that this white house is friendly towards business. neil: at least all the fakery is off. the president made it clear how he feels. the small businesses have admitted how they feel. they don't have the day count like you. now, at least we know where we stand. >> he's still the president. they have to find a way to make it work in the remaining years. it is what it is. they can't do anything about it. >> that's the thing. they'll do nothing. >> they'll work with republicans around the edges and hope that they can negotiate something that's more in their favor than they've gotten in the last six years. neil: don't hold your breath. >> 770 days. neil: look at this guy. [laughter]

all right when we come back, the rev that got you roaring and then some. >> i'll make a path in the wilderness and rivers in the desert. god is doing a new thing. we're going forward not backwards and i want people to know that worldwide, all over the world because this foolishness has to stop.

they challenge us. they take us to worlds full of heroes and titans. for respawn, building the best teractive entertainment begins with the cloud. this is "titanfall," the first multi-player game built and run on microsoft azure. empowering gamers around the world to interact in ways they never thought possible. this cloud turns data into excitement. this is the microsoft cloud. hard it can be...how ...to breathe with copd? it can feel like this. copd includes chronic bronchitis and emphysema. spiriva is a once-daily inhaled... ...copd maintenance treatment... ...that helps open my airways for a full 24 hours. you know, spiriva helps me breathe easier. spiriva handihaler tiotropium bromide

inhalation powder does not replace rescue inhalers for sudden symptoms. tell your doctor if you have kidney problems, glaucoma, trouble urinating, or an enlarged prostate. these may worsen with spiriva. discuss all medicines you take, even eye drops. stop taking spiriva and seek immediate medical help if your breathing suddenly worsens, your throat or tongue swells,... you can get hives, vision changes or eye pain, or problems passing urine. other side effects include dry mouth and constipation. nothing can reverse copd. spiriva helps me breathe better. sfx: blowing sound. does breathing with copd... ...weigh you down? don't wait ask your doctor about spiriva handihaler.

neil: forget what is the deal with this. a lot of you are wondering why other networks aren't also featuring the rabble on the show putting others to shame. >> as a nation and that community and people, we are just going down, especially in the black community. and who are you to want to call at all? you lost this battle but we are going to win the next one. so sit down, god is not with

you. neil: we got a lot of reaction. you can stop rolling in your grave and another says this was a fantastic show and you brought us positivity and it's wonderful to see someone that will it will be part of the solution instead of fanning racism. and jay said fox business just took fair and balanced to a whole new level and give them in his own show. and reverend gentry is a reverend of what religion? that would be the religion of martin luther king that would be proud in the war that he is preaching and i think you're right on that. and that is a script that we

knew already. he was right in every single quote and reference. and some pages are up to no good. the mainstream media prefers the goofballs are really out there. and bernard says i love he said that god doesn't judge us by her stumbles allies and on that, al sharpton should press lightly because i have a feeling where he is going it's going to be warm. okay, i see what you're saying. and you are evangelist is just an uncle tom with a collar. because he speaks a point of view that isn't your own he is that why you say that? and neil cavuto, he you are seeing the best of the holy rollers on tv, thank you for providing a refreshing alternative and a refreshing break. and as a catholic priest, we can never know ultimate ultimate

intentions but god always seems to spot his false prophets. and i suspect god is pleased. not with you, my son, but with your guest. merry christmas, father. and kathleen to new jersey says don't get a big head, but you been rocking on this, the riots in protests and getting more peaceful guest to discuss all of this. i'm not saying you're going to heaven, but you're going to the top of your class, sadly it is a class of broadcast buffoons. and why did she start out so nice? don't write me again. anyway, a halo for the admiral. not on anyway come you can go to facebook.com and let us know what you think. and you can not only friend me but you can even put angel

attachments on there. can you do that? we don't know. anyway, thank you for watching. we will see you all tomorrow, whether i go to hell or not, you're all heavenly to me. john: maternity care, alcohol care, and more? i will have to raise my rates or lose money unless i can get taxpayers to bail me out. we don't want people to know that we are talking about so we will call it risk corridors. uncle sam will raise down with lots of your money and give it to companies that the politicians want to please. have some tax