network. that's where we work on our facebook page. that's it for us tonight. good night from new york. thanks for being with us. ♪ neil: how can we degrade and destroy isis if we're still dismissing isis? welcome, everybody. don't be afraid, america. not even the image of a jordanian pilot being burned alive has fired this president up to call the enemy for what it is. forget about whether he's stubborn. both parties are asking out loud, is he just stupid? i don't think that's fair. but in this environment, a lot of people are right to think about it. jordan is certainly not pussy-footing around this islamic thing. we shouldn't either. but we still are. and i'm wondering now, colonel, if this means that we don't recognize how isis is upping the game or we think now that jordan is involved,

we don't have to be as involved in the game. what do you think is going on? >> well, neil good to be with you this evening. up front, i agree. we have to call isis what it is: they are a brutal barbaric, terrorist organization that uses whatever means it feels necessary to include a radical interpretation of islam to validate all of their actions. and they must be destroyed. the latest incident is just the tip of the iceberg on what lengths they'll go through to spread their terror message across the world. neil: do you think you get anywhere, the administration is playing semantics. that it recognizes these terrorists. it recognizes that these are bad guys. enough said. it doesn't have to start playing as to whether they're islamic extremists, muslim extremists. it's already made clear these are bad, bad guys. what difference would it

make, in your eyes, going to the next level in saying, not just bad guys but islamic extremist bad guys? >> yeah, i mean, neil, honestly, we continue to play semantics with that. but i think the real important piece is understanding that what these folks understand is pressure and pain. and regardless of what you call it or you want to interpret it as, they are an extremist organization, and they must be destroyed. and additionally they must be destroyed by continuing to build the coalition strong. that is the real threat as we move forward with this organization and with the potential impact it could have if we don't deal with it. neil: this is a dumb question, colonel, but you've heard many of me in the past. what do we get out of doing what we do? we must be yielding something out of holding back on certain terminology. either they're not as rough or those moderates in the muslim world don't -- don't get as agitated. but now the moderates in the muslim world are

agitated. saudi arabia is agitated. even the united arab emirates ar agitated. you get my point. (?) if they're annoyed, then the coast is clear. we can go full throttle with just saying it for what it is. >> well, you know, being annoyed is one thing, neil. but i want to see what actually happens. you can talk all we want about being absolutely distressed by what we saw the other day on tv with the jordanian pilot. but, at the end of the day, what are we going to do? okay. the moderate islamic world has to recognize this for what it is as well. and we must continue to come together to destroy this threat. so there is a lot of rhetoric. i've seen a lot of rhetoric, even today about how people are upset. but the next question i have is: what are we going to do? we need to continue to step up, build the coalition, root these

folks out wherever they are and take a long-term view that this threat must be destroyed, it must be destroyed holistically really, neil, however you want to call it. neil: that's well-put. thank you very much. now to the social media side to fighting this battle. this is fighting isis in iraq. i don't know if you heard about this. not for the us military. it's duly actually fighting with the kurds. they responded to a kurdish campaign to join the fight. steve says the kurds are asking for help because we're not giving that help. or how would you describe it, steve? >> well, we're not giving them sufficient help. we're helping to rearm them, but we still have not put our special operators, our best guys together with them to fight this fight. so they're looking for help elsewhere. kudos to them for going head-to-head on the

internet with isis. i wish we were doing more of that as well. but right now, you know there's just not enough of the good guys in this fight yet. neil: i don't know who are the good guys, steve. you're good on this. i remember from the arab spring uprising. we were supporting the guys who appeared to be the good guy and the winners. they turned around and zoomed in. maybe part of this is our own reluctance built on experience of screwing up. >> there's some of that there. some of it is justified. we do not have a track record of figuring out who the right ones are to support in the middle eastern world. we know for a fact that isis is honest to gosh horrible guys. the kurds are trying to protect themselves, protect their women and children. there are a couple of

clear-cut ones. some others not so much. helping the kurds helping the certain elements of the iraqi military, these folks are the good guys, they fought with us -- neil: we know isis is evil. whoever wants to eradicate them, it's fine in our boat. right? >> except for bashar al-assad. he'd like them to go away. he's bad too. neil: we commit. and then all of a sudden oh, no, we're in bed with the delve. that'sdevil. >> not necessarily. we can fight isis without propping up assad. you just have to pick your spots correctly and accurately. neil: steve, thank you very much. >> thanks for having me. neil: meanwhile, to another tragedy caught on tape. this one accidentally. a transasia plane crashing after takeoff.

thirty-one are known dead. believe it or not, the guy in the cab survived. plane crashes don't happen very often but lately they've been happening in asia. to aviation attorney doug lotto who fears it won't be the last. doug, you and i were talking in the break. people will look at this region. i have the world as an oyster to go to. i will stay away from -- >> i wouldn't put my family on these carriers. what's happening in asia, you have a proliferation of these low-budget airlines who are vying for the traveling dollar which has become prolific in that area of the world. what you need is a tighter regulatory oversight over theseariums. andthese airlines. there have been five major accidents within the past 13 months --

neil: this carrier has seven since 1995. three quite severe. i guess people will look at that and say well they are all like that over there. is there an equivalent of the faa over there? >> there is. transasia is governed by the taiwanese agent. they try to be the faa. they aren't the faa. they don't have the expertise that the faa has. this particular carrier has major crashes. my heart goes out to these people. over the past seven months. neil: why wouldn't they reign it in? surely the risk of flying, those costs will go up exponentially. it's not in their best interest to cheat this. >> that's where regulation believes in. their faa the caa has to take a top to bottom look at the airline. we saw this horrific video. you see the left engine was probably not

functioning properly -- neil: right away, they were screaming may day. may day. >> these aircrafts are certified to fly on one engine. training issues we have to look at, pilot. these carrier needs a top to bottom overhaul. the only entity that can put this out of business is the government, caa or people stop flying on them. neil: sometimes it makes a big difference when you hear about planes disappearing or another one shot down over ukraine, when you see it, when you see video of something, it does change the ball game a little bit. because people say, no way am i going to be over there. i'm not risking it. >> much more dramatic. since everyone has now -- we've seen it now 100 times, it's certainly -- neil: what about people in america, i'll auto fly a us carrier over there? is it safer? >> i fly a us flag

carrier or a home carrier of that particular nation if it's a well-known carrier. neil: except arrow fly. >> absolutely not. (?) domestically when you have these pop up airlines that put profit over safety, take a hard look at them. neil: were you survived there were survivors? >> i was surprised. the manner in which it rolled into the engine then turned literally upside down. apparently about 15 or so. (?) when they lift the fuselage, they'll find when who are missing unfortunately did not survive. the fact that anyone got out with their life is an amazing accomplishment. neil: indeed. doug, thank you very much. >> good seeing you. neil: generally companies that go through ceos like tissue paper don't inspire confidence. what about presidents that go through press secretaries even faster?

neil: all right. it's time for neil's spiel. and imagine if apple went through four ceos in six years. it's safe to say its stock wouldn't be looking at a record high. or if google were looking for top execs instead of on top execs searching period. would it be the giant it is now? would you invest in a company whose top talent seems chased away or those who stand the test of time and keep chiseling away? the ceo chair is not constantly spinning. fairly or not cash follows continuity, that's how investors find diamonds in the rough. they avoid the companies

who are being run out. something about stability, i'm told, consistency, i'm told. steady as she goes reliability i'm told. consistency isn't musical chairs. and reliability isn't bosses on roller skates. what about the grilling of another defense secretary candidate. itit would be the fourth in the president's six years. they ask why he is the fourth and what the heck went on with the other three? forget about whether that inspires much confidence in the new guy, does it inspire even less confidence in the man who keeps going through these guys? the president of the united states. now, if you're judged by the company you keep shouldn't it hold that you're also judged by the company you can't keep. nothing screams cell like an organization where folks bolt. would you put up with that ship, or would you just say, i've had enough of this ship?

you don't know how many times i practiced that. to former hostess ceos would not put up with that nor would investors. artist extraordinaire. would you take that job knowing what's happened to your predecessors? >> no, and that's the problem. you see it in business and politics. a leader, who actually can carry off the job who has the right stuff to do the job, they're not interested in being a lapdog. if i see companies and businesses where they have rotated ceos multiple times that tells you there's dysfunction at the board. neil: but you did see that? >> i did. neil: you came in as a takeover artist. right? >> right. many situations i went into over 30 years had that kind of churn at the top. when you have that, you have to look above that. and say, what's the board doing? or what's the owner doing, or both?

and you find dysfunction. so, you know for these defense secretaries, i think, and some have come out later and said micro management or said whatever they want to call it. neil: robert gates said it takes this guy forever to make a decision. >> they try to be judicious. there's probably differences in strategy. at the end of the day, that's a difficult job if the decision making really happens in the white house between president obama and valerie -- neil: if you were to take that money, not that you would every ceo i talk to, they come into the job. first, they're enamored with ceo. defense secretary of the united states, that's one of the most prestigious positions in the cabinet. who will turn that down until they get there and they realize, wait a minute, i'm not calling the shots. right? >> well, that's the problem. right? people who are successful in whatever career they're choosing those people want to have an impact. they want to impact wherever they are.

they want to impact it positively and chart a course and achieve. right? if you get into that position and you think, wow, you know, i'm defense secretary or i'm ceo or i have some kind of great title, that will wear off after about 30 days if you realize you can't have an impact because you're not -- neil: or you're being second guessed. i think one of the ceos ofhe was being second guessed by steve jobs, the founder. he could never really get his footing. right? >> that's exactly right. neil: like when you came into the hostess, what did you do? who did you just sort of have a talking to, don't mess with me? >> it's interesting. i've had that conversation on lots of different occasions. by now it's fortunate people know i won't be anybody's lapdog in any circumstances. neil: you've engendered fear. >> sometimes that helps.

but i liken gender confidence. i have to make clear that i have to be free to do it the way i think it needs to be done. right? i don't need to be second guessed. i need support from -- neil: inevitable you are. right? >> you know, bankruptcy, in a crisis, always someone second-guessing -- neil: that's different. you could argue this nation is bankrupt. but what would be your advice to this next defense secretary assuming he gets approved? >> i think he's saying the right things. for example he talked about arms -- arming ukraine's -- in that conflict. interestingly enough -- neil: and the kurds. >> half an hour after that, josh earnest said, arming ukraine is the president's decision. neil: i see where this is -- >> that's the point. right? but i think all carter can do is do what he's saying he'll do today which is i will make -- neil: you're right. these defense

secretaries, they're impressive guys. just not the in-charge defense guys, are they? >> that's the problem. neil: very interesting. good seeing you. imagine if the government just wiped away a lot of folks debt. just not your debt. no, they get a pass, you get the bill. think it can't happen. for a lucky few in another country it's already happening. and it could be coming here soon. ♪

neil: what is the croatian term for wham, bam, thank you ma'am. a government plan that puts a lot of our handouts to shame. the croatian government forgiving debt owed by 60,000 of its poor citizens. actually not just forgiving the debt but wiping it away as if it never existed.

jessica thinks so. katherine says, don't give this administration any ideas. you don't like what you see here, even though the argument in croatia, these are poor people. not a slippery slope. tell katherine to calm down. >> while they're doing that, this is a government program. they're sending the message, it's not your responsibility. it's the government's responsibility to do this. which encourages noncompliance. if i was a little less poor, i would regret being that responsible. not being less responsible with my money. neil: or you would be waiting for your handout. >> it would make it worse for these people. if i were these firms, i would be careful about loaning money with people with a lower income. neil: isn't this the equivalent of a bankruptcy, even though it's a government sanctioned one? >> well, i mean, in this

situation, they're targeting people who have made less than 370 american dollars in the last three weeks. so it really is for the poorest of the poor. and i think it's actually an interesting and sort of imaginative idea that they're using on their national level. because croatia has been in a very deep recession. they work with the imf. neil: so how is forgiving 60,000 people's debt, however humanitarian going to jive with those that will have to pick up the slack and pay for that? >> well, because what they're trying to do is actually stimulate their economy. they have a low gdp right now. and the debt that is getting forgiven is actually specifically with utilities with telecom. neil: i understand. so you understand that that money that normally would have gone to the government is spent, and might ignite the economy? >> i think the government is actually working here to try to work with the other utilities and businesses to sort of help them. because they've already

said that they have no chance of getting this money that is owed from these people. neil: but, see, i know. but what worries me about that, that is saying then that the government is bailing out the utilities, so to speak, under the guys guise of recognizing -- you could do that until the cows come home with college loans. debt. paid sick-time. you can make justifications. >> why not bail out everybody then. this won't do anything to stimulate the economy. because they're so poor, they're on we welfare. not making anything. they can spend that $300. spend it. why wouldn't they be in the same situation after with more debt because they haven't addressed any of the underlying problems. the preelection moves. they're not very popular. this is addressing a consequence, but not the root of the problem. huge unemployment. 20% overall approximately it.it won't get any

better if you're in the same circumstance. neil: if this were tested here you would be floored. >> i don't think it would be tested here. neil: news flash it already is in varying ways. >> i mean that's debatable on many levels. but i think it's very different. this is only one of a number. the imf has given crochet laundry list of things they need to implement. it's also a good opportunity. croatia is an incredibly beautiful place. not far from italy. neil: you're right. by the way, i'm not an apologist trying to -- >> helping the international economy here. neil: those guys are thieves. the draconian measures. makes the mob look like mother teresa. >> in terms of bailouts. we've bailed out our automotive industry. so i think, you know

helping -- neil: we bail out lots of people people. >> helping croatian people is not necessarily a bad thing. neil: i don't know. i don't know. when we come back, isis is looking for a financial lifeline and us citizens are giving it to them. how some of your own neighbors could could be funding terror, after this. so you can enjoy that second home sooner. know the right financial planning can help you save for college and retirement. know where you stand with pnc total insight. a new investing and banking experience with personalized guidance and online tools. visit a branch, call or go online today.

congratulations. you're down with crestor. yes! when diet and exercise aren't enough, adding crestor lowers bad cholesterol up to 55%. crestor is not for people with liver disease or women who are nursing, pregnant,

or may become pregnant. tell your doctor all medicines you take. call your doctor if you have muscle pain or weakness, feel unusually tired have loss of appetite, upper belly pain, dark urine or yellowing of skin or eyes. these could be signs of serious side effects. i'm down with crestor! make your move. ask your doctor about crestor.

. neil: just because isis is running low on cash, does not mean it can't scare us on the cheap. this latest brutal jordanian hostage killing proves it. crude as it was this very slickly produced butchery wasn't exactly free to do, so isis is clearly raising money. from someone. but who? where? what if i told you a lot of someones right here in the u.s. courtesy of bitcoin, retired general richard duttin. we've got it backwards.

forget about people joining isis. we've got to focus as well or maybe instead for the time being on those funding isis and they're right here, right? >> right certainly think in terms of funding sources that isis tried to tap into. as you mentioned oil on the black market that is significantly reduced through the air campaign. neil: and through the declining prices. >> you bet. the other aspect of that is they are also using ransom. using extortion, but other ways to fund-raise for the dollars, it may be through cyberor cryptocurrency which is unregulated, anonymous and virtually a global currency that anyone can have access to. neil: many argue that bitcoin could be a threat to our dollar, which would be a twin benefit for bad guys. but how is it done? if you're one who wants to fund isis here how are they going

through bitcoin do it? >> i'm not purporting we have a large fund-raising effort in the united states. neil: we know it's worldwide. there is a lot of concentration. >> the potential is there. bitcoin is that cryptocurrency is available, it's available again here in the united states, available globally. neil: and hard to police hard to follow. >> very hard to police. it's not regulated. we don't have law that pertain to those and it's on the open market, and it's a currency that very few american people receive. neil: are they getting a lot of money? >> my sources say they're not. there is a potential to gain that money. something that goes back to the previous conversations we had with regard to the new domain of warfare called cyber, and that certainly in the air and in space and ground and so forth, those domains are where conflict occurs. in cyber, how do we go after the potential or future fund-raisers or current fund-raisers where they try to gain money through the realm of bitcoin and so forth.

that is something we need to focus on here. neil: the al qaeda and taliban, they might not be getting as much money, but they have perfected how to get money. >> isis has, they are adapting ways to go after western currencies and western ways in the cyberrealm and so where al qaeda tries to get funding externally isis tries to do it internally, and they'll go through any way to resource the funding and bitcoin and dollar cryptocurrency is very scary. neil: you've been warning about it for a while. you have been warning. general, thank you very much. >> my pleasure neil. neil: a case of republican bad timing many goppers are holding up homeland funding no less than the country's first fumble tom ridge telling me that it's a big mistake. a foolish one to hire republican congressman jim

george on whether the party has a plan b. >> the plan is the bill we sent over there, neil, and to get 7 democrat senators who last november when the president who before said 22 times he couldn't do, it then did the executive amnesty action they could step forward. neil: but they're not, they're not. i understand what you're trying to do but you've heard from the likes of tom ridge and other republicans who fear the vehicle you're trying to push, you shouldn't be pushing, what do you say? >> well, look we understand it's a danger talked about how dangerous and evil the terrorist threat is. we understand that. we provided every single penny that the president wants to get to the department of homeland security to secure our borders. we provided that money in the bill but took an oath to uphold the constitution, and everyone understands what the president did last november was unconstitutional. neil: i understand. so you're saying you're not,

you're not withholding funding for homeland security, you're withholding funding for the operation would handle this you argue the president is illegally pushing yeah? >> we passed a bill that funds department of homeland security. we're not going to allow you to use the taxpayer dollars, the people spoke loud and clear, what you did is unconstitutional. seven democrat senators said it's unconstitutional. let's pass that legislation which is exactly what the american people want us to do and why they sent us here. neil: see how it goes. is there a plan b if it fails? >> not right now. plan a is what the american people want. we have 22 days to persuade seven democrat senators to do the same thing. neil: you really think you're going to get 7 democrats on board? >> this is the problem with this place. people say one thing election time and never carry it through. they said it was wrong last november. we're asking bring the bill up.

you can offer amendments. you can have debates. >> very good point, there are ways you can finesse it. congressman, thank you very much. >> thank you, neil. >> okay, sure he skinied out, fat chance al is going to catch grief for the tax stunts he's pulling now. lizzie with the skinny on a man who is increasingly slippery. [man grunts] one wishful thinking, right? but there is one step you can take to help prevent another serious disease- pneumococcal pneumonia. one dose of the prevnar 13® vaccine can help protect you ... from pneumococcal pneumonia, an illness that can cause coughing, chest pain difficulty breathing and may even put you in the hospital. prevnar 13 ® is used in adults 50 and older to help prevent infections from 13 strains of the bacteria that cause pneumococcal pneumonia. you should not receive prevnar 13 ® if you've had a severe allergic reaction to the vaccine or its ingredients if you have a weakened immune system, you may have a lower response to

the vaccine. common side effects were pain, redness, or swelling at the injection site. limited arm movement, fatigue, head ache muscle or joint pain less appetite, chills, or rash. even if you've already been vaccinated with another pneumonia vaccine, prevnar 13® may help provide additional protection. get this one done. ask your healthcare professional about prevnar 13® today.

. neil: it's good to have connections, anyone else following these shady stunts would be in jail. not one al sharpton who if our very own lizzie mcdonald is right, and she's never wrong, a bigger tax cheat than we've been expecting. liz, explain. >> according to reports he owes 3 million personally owes 3 million in federal taxes. neil: in backtaxes? >> right. >> but other people have gone to jail for lesser amounts. we're not advocating anybody go to jail. we're saying wait a second, there seems to be disparate

treatment. chuck berry went to jail for lesser amounts. $200,000 owed. fuji's lauryn hill, richard hest went to jail leona helmsley went to jail for lesser amounts. >> he is disputing this with the irs done anything deliberately? deceaseful? dishonest? >> good question personal tax returns, nonprofit seems to owe back taxes. they are serial tax cheaters tax avoiders. neil: that is a big deal. >> a big deal. some of the individuals that i noted did not file actual physical tax returns, they got in trouble for that. pete rose owes 354,000 because he didn't report memorabilia and autograph signings and other things on tax returns. he went to prison. and there's 3.1 million.

neil: that's kind of sharpton money. >> that's right. it comes close. but and there you are going to see leona helmsley. he is saying this is misleading, taken totally out of context, every time shaun bell or ferguson or trayvon martin comes up, they go through my taxes. he's been having tax return problems since the early 90s. neil: sure, i remember back in the tawana brawley days. >> i sat down with tax auditors, they treat taxpayers differently depending where you live. it's an open secret. this is warning to al sharpton watch out, other people went to jail for lesser amounts, prison, prison. neil: why sharpton is getting away with this? what do you think? >> i tell you what you've got powerful friends like the attorney general of united states, and your bff happens to

be, oh, the president of the united states, and you've got godfathers like nbc news and the comcast corporation, well you know these poor bureaucrats at the irs they have bosses and they understand that it could be a bit troublesome for them to go after al sharpton. neil: but the evidence piles up niger to lizzie's point, i also know a lot of politicians can leave you in a heart beat. are we at that stage yet? or are they going ride this one out. >> i think in the case of sharpton, she largely going to get a pass through the obama administration. i think, i heard rumored that he had a confrontation with somebody, might have been a reporter questioning him about his irs troubles and he mentioned the fact he dropped eric holder and president obama and the fact he had coffee with them recently. that's a large signal to these folks.

what's important neil because this is the same type of administration that always talks about income inequality and gets into class warfare, this is the trouble with big government with, overtaxation of the american people. understanding they're targeting the rich but in reality they're targeting those of us poor shlubs that want to be rich. what they do in big government is you have a protected class of citizens that have good relationships with these politicians and these overregulators and overtaxers. >> that's the secret friend these guys and can you cheat all you want. so what are you whining about? >> that's the bottom line. and the poor and work class got to stop going for the okeydoke. neil: there you go, niger innis. >> thank you. neil: we know that robots are taking over. this is a bit much. the companies that say they're about to make drivers obsolete.

it's a fact. kind of like shopping hungry equals overshopping.

. neil: in tonight's biz blitz, google and uber fighting over this, both companying duking it out who will be the first to release self-driving cars, really? a lot of people saying that google has the advantage. i don't know who wants to be first to this but i guess they figure it will be worth being first, what do you think? >> i'm kind of with you on the implication that this is a battle over the electronic buggy whip. i mean i look in the past history of just getting approval for a driverless car, the big dig in boston took 16 years to get done. can you imagine the hoops that google, uber anyone else amazon with drones is going to have to go through to get this done?

i think this is 25 years in the making, and by then could move onto other things. neil: i don't know, must see it as worth the while sabrina. do you? >> absolutely. the regulation issue is going to be a big one, maybe we should make it part of the 2016 presidential campaign, who can pave the way faster? but i think that google has the upper hand here. i know uber is in the car business so to speak but not in the business of making the technology for cars, and i think that google has been slowly showing that it's interested not just in the invisible technology out there but the intangible things like google glass. i put my money on them right now. >> like google glass and like this technology what if something goes wrong? and that's the issue. that's what the world is waiting for. not so much the technology but for it to go awry. remember total recall? remember in total recall? terrible drivers. neil: people driving in the commercial and do things. >> i don't know. neil: by the way, the worst

driverless car is better than my wife's driving. >> whoa, that was mean! >> sorry honey, it was in the prompter. united airlines wants to cram more people on a plane. i'm not talking a few. i'm talking 100 more seats on boeing 777's. scott, you're a slim young man, 100 seats! >> it's the suit. i thought this already happened. i always get next to the fat guy! so to me. neil: was that you in first class? >> it was me in the back of the plane, always by the bathroom. here's the issue, too. the airlines seeing a ton of profits doing just fine thank you very much, for charging you everything that you want to do on that plane, neil. now they want to add seats. come on. neil: they are going to have you standing like a cattle call in the skies and say you can stand, and just deal. >> as well they should.

>> scott makes airlines out to be like they're big oil. my gosh is there a harder industry to make money in than airlines? neil: don't you justify this human cruelty! >> but wait a second. you know, here's the benefit. people want the low prices, airlines, inflation adjusted prices have gone down 50% in the last 30 years. neil: they don't want it that badly. i'm telling. >> you you know what it is? it comes down to the fact everybody wants something different. i got on a u.s. airplane a week ago it was modern and more room. >> and maybe get an arm rest. >> some people are willing to pay the extra 80, $90 for the extra leg room. everybody has a different threshold. everyone is willing to make different trade-offs. people will pay the extra $90. other people will stand in the back. neil: i tell scott stay in coach because i don't want you

coming up by me. next up, one trillion shares of apple hitting new highs today. market cap is topping 700 billion bucks. full disclosure i'm an apple shareholder, have been for many, many years, do you think this is overdone or running too crazy? >> i do not. neil: let me put that down gary does not. yippie-ay-a. >> i think the stock is going to go $200. is there a consumer product on the tip of everyone's tongues like apple. now we're going to be the one to watch. neil: it could be right? what do you think, scott? >> could be neil they have the cult following. did you see the iphone numbers from last quarter? tens of millions! that's a cycle product. neil: 70 some odd million of anything in a quarter. >> you get a new one and you sell more. neil: right? >> yeah, i was excited by this but look here i am in

washington. i have to offer the perspective of what's coming down the pike with the budget. i know that the president is talking about lowering corporate tax rates, how is apple going to navigate the fact we're taxing foreign profits. i wonder if this is -- neil: we'll see, guys i want to thank you all much, much more right after this. there's nothing more romantic than a spontaneous moment. so why pause to take a pill? and why stop what you're doing to find a bathroom? with cialis for daily use, you don't have to plan around either. it's the only daily tablet approved to treat erectile dysfunction

so you can be ready anytime the moment is right. plus cialis treats the frustrating urinary symptoms of bph, like needing to go frequently, day or night. tell your doctor about all your medical conditions and medicines, and ask if your heart is healthy enough for sex. do not take cialis if you take nitrates for chest pain as it may cause an unsafe drop in blood pressure. do not drink alcohol in excess. side effects may include headache, upset stomach, delayed backache or muscle ache. to avoid long-term injury, get medical help right away for an erection lasting more than four hours. if you have any sudden decrease or loss in hearing or vision or any symptoms of an allergic reaction stop taking cialis and get medical help right away. why pause the moment? ask your doctor about cialis for daily use. for a free 30-tablet trial go to cialis.com no pictures of trucks pulling boats. no photos of men working on ranches. just a ram 1500 ecodiesel that gets 156 more miles per tank than the

ford f-150 ecoboost. get more facts at ramtrucks.com. the real question that needs to be asked is "what is it that we can do that is impactful?" what the cloud enables is computing to empower cancer researchers. it used to take two weeks to sequence and analyze a genome; with the microsoft cloud we can analyze 100 per day. whatever i can do to help compute a cure for cancer, that's what i'd like to do. your daughter has a brilliant idea for her science project. and you could make it happen. right? wrong. because you're not you you're a cancer hospital and your daughter... she's a team of leading researchers... and that brilliant idea is a breakthrough in patient treatment that could save thousands of lives. which means you need a diverse team

of advisors helping you. from research data analytics all the way to transformation of clinical care. so you call pwc. the right people to get the extraordinary done. announcer: what's the deal neil? >> and what is the deal with the president still downplaying isis. now, they may not be the jv team anymore, but is calling them a group or organization really that much better? particularly when jordan isn't mincing words giving the brutal killing of its own pilot, these guys are islamic extremists and worse, organization. my god, mr. president. get with the program. ditto carl in mississippi. i love that hawaiian democratic congressman you had on. words matter. helen: you invite more wrath when you pull your

punches. it's pretty clear that isis isn't giving the president any break for not calling them what they are so why does he still do it? i really have no idea. milton: i think it was your conversation with general keane that crystallized it for me. if you don't call the enemy what it is, they'll make a mockery of the leader they think you're not. sergeant joe: it is clear as a bell the president wants out of this region. he never wanted in in the first place. he's stubborn as hell. he wants to wash his hands out of the whole place. the bloodstains are hard to wipe off. if death doesn't scare you. maybe the debt will. a lot of you still writing that i felt i was the last guy still worried about the 18 trillion-dollar debt piled up. the happy days are here again, those deficits are hatch what they used

to be. as if half a trillion dollars is some sort of victory. lou in arkansas, printing more money only works as long as the world still accepts a worthless us dollar. that's a good point lou. those days are numbered. neil i pray to god the country doesn't reach the tipping point. jim, i hate to break it to you it already has. cavuto, you're like a broken record. we're broke. shut up and read the prompter fatso. keep believing that peter. you're a buffoon. my nasty responses. neil why would you recommend those who criticize you not watch you? as far as we can tell, fox business needs every viewer it can get. well, not viewers like that guys. and not viewers like you

guys if you guys keep this condescending crap up. you know, i have standards. i do. meanwhile, wow, what the hell happened to you. lately, you've become the most ill-mannered bastard i've heard lately. you cut your guests off. dave, i've had other such comments. they get annoying. i hit delete. i say you go out with a bang and kill yourself on-air. preannounce to have maximum effect. your fans will cry and everyone else will say now that is good tv. try it. okay? no. let's not try it. and, by the way are you sure that email was not meant for bill o'reilly. go to facebook.com/teamcavuto. try that.

i'm very vulnerable to the fat stuff. you know i've been eating a couple of salads now. and those ounces are just peeling off. all right. "strange inheritance" starts right now. ♪ >> a texas family inherits a house full of history worth millions. >> bob davis was a world class collector. >> he had a love affair with these items. >> and speaking of love affairs, what's this gun? >> this is a sawed off shotgun that was -- >> thought so. >> that was carried by the barrow gang. >> like bonnie and clyde? >> they spawned a legend. >> those images of the young outlaws shooting up the highways of america somehow touches people. >> it may yield a fortune. >> people are bidding on on the telephone. intense interest in the bonnie and clyde story. >> it was a wind blower to watch. ♪