ed deal with iran is in direct conflict with their survival. that's it for us tonight. join us here tomorrow. good night from new york. ♪ neil: welcome everybody. i'm neil cavuto. happy birthday, obamacare. five years ago you came into our lives and nothing has been the same since. our insurance premiums have skyrocketed. every big government initiative has its fits and starts. five years later i'm seeing a lot more fits than starts. and more broken promises. we know the one about keeping our doctor. can't. about prices for prescription drugs declining. aren't. and everyone eventually being covered to make it all worthwhile. not. in fact, at least 25 million americans still won't have health insurance when this is all said and done.

so why did we upend our entire medical system at all? five years ago today, wasn't that the idea, get everybody on board the sheer numbers would drive down the cost of medicare for all? sally writes no, not even close. she explains how insurance premiums in the non-group marketplace, those who don't get coverage through workshop for insurance well, those premiums are 24.4% higher than they would have been without obamacare. some birthday present. and for doctors some birthday surprise. nearly half of 20000 physicians recently surveyed now consider obamacare a failure. and the cost to taxpayers, more like a moving target. the congressional budget office estimates over the next ten years obamacare will cost 1.2 trillion bucks. 300 billion more than the president first promised. like i said, things are changing. subsidies that don't add

up. deductibles that make you want to throw up. whether you're part of this or lucky enough to get insurance through work you're feeling it when you get the bill. the administration only touts the good. do take a look at that 16 million americans that the white house insists has signed up according to sally, nine out of ten early signees already had coverage somewhere else. how many are actually new? i suspect a couple million tops. i'm probably being generous. which makes this particular birthday very sad. but what the heck. it's all our birthdays. so we'll cry if we want to because you would to too if it happened to you. you're so lucky i was not inning singing those lines. so richard who could sing it flawlessly if he wanted. betsy mccoy.

jillian to you first. it seems to me that the benefits do not even come close to all those -- >> i completely agree with you. i want to point out, before obamacare women controlled two out of every $3 spent on health care. i think they did better on it than government. so you have women young women like me, premiums up about 45%. we get free birth control. then family premiums are up too. nothing is good about this. >> the benefit is a lot more people are supposedly insured. we don't know the real net game. what do you suppose the real net gain is. >> 9.7 million. that includes almost all medicaid enrollment. (?) you could have replaced this 2,570 bill with a 20 page bill that simply expanded medicaid and accomplished the same increase that the

president is touting. and it would be without the 24% increase in premiums, without the huge hike in deductibles. without the deminimum i guess of doctors and hospitals. you're right. this is a real bummer. (?) >> now, five years later, do you think it was worth it, richard? >> here's the thing. i disagree. you know i disagree. thank you for having here are the benefits of this law. number one being pregnant and having a baby is no longer a preexisting condition. prostate checks they're all part of health care coverage. not to mention the fact this atthat it obliterated -- you can now get health care for asthma. but let's talk about the cost for just a second. for the first time in history for a very long time, the cost on health care is finally going down. listen i talk to my audience. young people like myself. we are getting health

care at record numbers because of the affordable care act. >> what do you think of that? >> let's bring the truth meter in here. first of all, health care spending was increased at the lowest rate in 50 years before obamacare. >> it's now going down. neil: let me clarify. that was the recession. >> the slowdown in health care spending to this law, to the contrary. now you'll see according to the congressional budget office the pace of health care spending is double what it was before. >> but that -- >> i want to point out, we're talking about why health care costs have gone up. there's less competition. that was one of obama's fundamental promises about this law. you have fewer hospital networks. more doctors thinking about quitting their fields early. fewer insurers. and you don't get to keep your doctor. it's really great that we get ob-gyn. we're paying for that. >> i remember covering

this like practical should have gotten a condo in washington putting this together. (?) everyone was supposed to be covered. the idea was to insure everyone so that it would be a price well worth paying because that alone would justify it. no one would have to be without coverage. yet when all is said and done, they were talking to 30 million wouldn't have coverage. what did we do this for? >> look at those folks now getting coverage the amount of uninsured americans in this country decreased by 25%. we're all saving money. >> but we're not. i just went through the premiums. i just went to the hospital. >> when an uninsured person goes to the hospital we all pay the bill. all of our premiums -- >> we're paying through the nose right now. >> no no, no. i understand. are you saying without this, we would still be paying more? >> we would be paying through the roof because the premiums already -- >> don't be bamboozled

when he says you're getting a free colon colonos can a by. >> i never get excited when people say that. (?) >> being forced to pay for of these things feels almost as bad as having to get one. >> this is about preventive care. >> the government thinks it can do better than consumer when deciding health care coverage. >> do you think the jury is out on this? take more time to see how it all pans out. >> we were told we would like it as soon as it was passed. the jury is still out democrats would say 50% of americans don't like it. >> here's the most important thing we need to realize. the they said it would decrease our deficit. those numbers are coming true. we're seeing that happen. >> no, we're not. >> that's what the congressional budget office said. >> the congressional budget office said this came in far more --

>> depending on the day and the week. >> richard likes to reduce the deficit by raising taxes. >> look at the time. guys seriously, thank you very much. we saved time by talking over one another. i appreciate it all. meanwhile ted cruz, mr. anti obamacare. anti any kind of care, the tea party favorite making it official he's running for president of the united states. lest you think money might be a problem, you're right. with big donors, it could be, but not with the tea party faithful more than eager to give the firebrand what he needs. there are lots of them and we're going to have lots more on them. but first, to former best buy ceo brad anderson who welcomes lots of great ideas coming from lots of great republican candidates. and he suspects cruz is just the start. brad, the argument you hear is that great

ideas, maybe but stream but extreme ideas. >> i'm excited about a raucous debate. there's the a big point of view. (?) the president said -- ted cruz is the polar opposite. he speaks from a set of principles. he's intellectually clear. his candidates will love him. he will be a great fundraiser for the democrats. >> you know, i'm not casting aspersions, but what amazed me, if anyone caught this cruz announcement in virginia today, that was all off prompter. he was winging the whole thing. man, that's pretty impressive. not too many candidates or for that matter anchors can do that. roll up, prompter. >> well, who would want to debate him?

i mean, he has evidence. edges from a set of principles. he's an attorney, so ease really good at it. (?) he'll be formidable in any debate. it's great for america. makes those points of view out there. more people can receive them because of how good he is at voicing those points. >> you've been drawn in the past to mainstream republicans. he's not in that mainstream camp. and mainstream typically says guys like cruz and to a lesser extent rand paul sort of feed off the crazy part of the party. that's the idea you get from mainstream. do you agree with that, they tear the party down and the party's chances? >> no, i don't think so. i actually -- and you're right. i'm typically drawn to those candidates. they typically fall out early because they can't get money. >> right. right. >> but i do think that getting a clear line of

demarcation between -- so americans really realize how big the choice is between these two parties at their base is really good for america to see. and then i think we make our choice. we'll have lots of other candidates besides ted cruz and the other candidate. >> that's what i hear brad. and i agree with you. the more in, the merrier. the feistier the debate the better. that could be you and me. brad anderson, great chatting with you. brad touched on the money issue. that is ted's biggest issue. big money donors are backing away from him and backing the moderates like a jeb bush or mike huckabee or marco rubio. the money guys, for whatever reason, and they didn't get money for being idiots but they seem to be drawn to these guys as sure bets or surer bets. >> well look, this is a debate we have every four years. it's a debate about what direction for the party to go in. i will note that every

time we follow the advice of the washington consultants, every time we run to the middle we lose. it happens over and over again. whether it's gerald ford or bob mccain or mitt romney, it's not a winning strategy. did you catch that little zinger of mitt romney. you'll hear what mitt romney thinks about that tomorrow night on fox business. on if cruz is right. financial backers have a failing strategy, he would be a good investment. pat, what do you think of that? >> well, you know, it's a complicated question. let me just say that first of all, i agree with some of the things that brad said. you know, he's a very very smart guy. and he handles himself well. that was a brilliant, you know, kind of layout today in going without notes. having it in the round. interesting announcement. the problem for him, what is he trying to do?

he's running as the candidate and he argued today that he's the candidate basically of the, you know, far right. the conservative movement. but at the same time -- and that we don't need moderates. republicans don't need moderates or independents. it's a very interesting battle of ideas going on there. so but let me just say this about the money. message always trumps money if the message is powerful enough. and particularly in early states. that's why theoretically, we have iowa and new hampshire. >> right. >> as rick santorum showed. >> you know, i'm wondering whether that money that right now is glomming to the jeb bushes maybe some of the others. bigger names scott walker comes to mind. it might be inclined to look at a cruz if he catches on. what do you think? >> well, let's face it ted cruz is not the establishment candidate. and not in the -- the establishment donor will not be attracted to ted

cruz. >> but noelle, that used to be the case for ronald reagan before he became the establishment. >> well, let's look at something that obama did with the youth movement back in '08. he had small donors. you know, grassroots on his side of the party. it became like a phenomena. let's look at what ted cruz can do as a fundraiser not as a candidate. as a fundraiser, he will attract that small donor. but here's the trick, neil can he get the repeat customer? can he get the consistent donor? someone giving $25 a month every month on up to the primary? he'll need $50 million like rubio and everyone else coming to the table for the iowa caucus. >> jimmy carter did it in iowa. can this guy do it? >> we have public financing as barack obama did in 2008 our president for democracy.

and, you know, we have here a situation where you can get small donors. there are also large donors that will support him. the other thing is these independent pacs for candidates as terms of being separate those take unlimited amounts of money. look again, i go back to message. it's about what you have to say. let me say this about cruz. his problem is deciding -- he's running right now and he had a great resume of who he is. the problem is barack obama has ruined that a bit. the question is, walker is succeeding because he's able to talk about his experience. >> we shall see. i want to thank you both. did starbucks throw cold coffee on itself? or because we flipped the lid on this show? once it came out race together starbucks ceo racing to contain the damage. radio shack, this was the day an american icon

hit static and then just was allowed to die. ♪

a♪♪ >> what the tech? an old tech titan kaput? it's looking that way for radio shack. or should i say radio sack? few with cash looking to resurrect this tech icon. when radio shack was big, forgive us if we start with an old tech name that's all but put out to the pasture. it's a timely reminder for those who think success is a guarantee. the consultant russ. all right, what do you make of radio shake radio shack and whether it's making a

bigger story here? >> essentially, it's toast. we've seen companies come forth and say maybe we'll save some of the stores, buy some of the stock. this company can't exist in the modern day and sell do dads and batteries. >> what did they do wrong? >> they couldn't adjust to the internet. >> i would get rid of the radio part. >> the branding is a part. you have amazon that's beating their prices hand and -- there's no way you can match that. (?) it's a constant fighting off this trend. and you just can't do it. >> and a reminder to any technology superstar today, no guarantee you'll be around -- keep innovating keep changing. the electric car maker is giving itself a mid-ride jolt. literally announcing a software update that elon musk hopes eases range and fatigue once and for all. the fear that you'll run

out of battery on the highway. it gives tesla drivers a heads-up on the nearest charging stations. the most efficient places to charge. >> i think it is. if you're buying an electric car, what if i run out of juice on the highway? okay, i'm going to new york to boston am i going to be able to make it there? where do i stop off? it figures out the nitty-gritty before you get on the road. i think it's smart. >> my wife tests whatever the fuel range is. if it says 7 miles, she'll try to get the 7 miles. on the tesla vehicle when it says 100 miles, 50 miles, i hear that can vary widely with the temperature outside. >> i wouldn't say wildly. maybe a 10% variance. also depends on traffic. >> but 80 miles, it could be 72 miles or 88 miles. >> sure.

but this software is conservative. obviously, they don't want people stuck on the side of the road. >> i laugh when i drive by people like that who are. just point. in the meantime, from tesla to chevrolet's teen watch. teen driving monitoring situation that can relay where the kids are going. how fast they're driving. do you buy this? a lot of personal privacy advocates who is eh. >> that's the issue. privacy. where is this data go. is it going to the parents or the companies creating it. general motors. who knows. i definitely think it's a good idea for parents to monitor where their kids are want to see that technology in cell phones. kids don't make the best choices in driving. >> this is a car that's a big smartphone with wheels. >> that's precisely it. >> has chevrolet done anything taboo? >> how worried are you that your kid will text while they're driving or

listen to their radio too loud. all sorts of stuff. they're aware wary about that stuff and shut it down. can i turn this feature off when i'm driving. i don't want gm tracking where i'm going. >> where are you going? >> i'm just saying. i don't want to make judgments here but. >> great job, my friend. iran is calling death to america and the president is frozen in time. time to let it go or i'll sing that song. ♪ [laughter]

♪ neil: well, mr. president take a cue from "frozen" and let it or i'll sing it. get over it because you don't have to be an ice queen to see you're on ice. i think john mccain is

right on this. you have to move on. so benjamin netanyahu won and you hate the fact that he did but adding insult to injury and lecturing him rather than congratulating him doesn't endear you to anyone. it makes you look pet lent. let bygones be bygones. they're still shouting death to america. that gets old. but they're still doing. you're taking them off a watch list in america. no, they're free to speak like they've lost their mind. bb gets an earful for speaking his mind. you're still jabbing jerusalem. (?) take it from elsa, you really are on thin ice. let it go! [laughter] because you're looking cartoonish, and i'm out of cartoon references, but fortunately, i'm not

out of great guests who are far smarter. former republican candidate allen west who says if you don't cool it we'll be worse off for it. but he keeps going and going. >> i think the president is living in some type of fantasy world. >> like a queen elsa. >> yeah, like a queen elsa. but when you look at what we've seen, the relationship in egypt where he was so supportive of muhammad -- >> remember the muslim brotherhood. >> change on a dime. >> moammar gadhafi wasn't the greatest of guys but he was better than having radicals there. now we find out that he was talking to people his son was saying that hey, we'll be happy to go. we'll be happy to transition leadership. but that was not good enough. you see what's happening in iraq. how that place has been destabilized. the kurds are asking for support. they're not getting it. >> and we're picking

apart benjamin netanyahu. you've been in this situations. whether you hate a leader or not. and many leaders hate other leaders. you don't air the dirty laundry for the world to see. >> especially that relationship where he's living in a neighborhood with enemies all around him. hamas. all of them. >> what do you think of him revealing what he said in a phone call, i think that's weird. >> it's extremely weird. it's supposed to be a private conversation. >> what i thought, any other leader is going to speak to him, how do i know this guy won't jump to a press release. >> who will help us out? think about the doctor who targeted osama bin laden for us, he's sitting in a pakistan prison. his lawyer was assassinated in pakistan. so we're not emboldening our allies. we're emboldening our enemies right now. to take iran off the terrorist list because you want some deal with

them. we should not make deals with them. either a deal or a treaty. but monte hall should not be opening up door one or three. >> you're absolutely right. (?) where does it all go? i think our relations with israeli are irreparably damaged. >> at least for the next 18 months. democrats are even concerned about this relationship. but it will be very tough for these next 18 years. russian came out to threaten denmark. they go under this missile defense shield. >> scary time times. by the way, you looked great on outnumbered on fox news. try not to be good at this tv stuff. i practiced decades on this. >> i'm a good guest, not a host. >> 401(k) plans a failure for americans. my buddy charles does not buy it. no payne no gain wants

to second the record straight. all new "strange inheritance." a jurassic gold mine. i don't know what it's about. 9:00 p.m. on fbn. ♪

♪ >> no payne no gain. the segment charles answers questions that experts toned ignore and let things slide. or in this case those now bashing 401(k)s for supposedly failing americans. who is putting this nonsense out! charles you're charged. you don't like it. charles: i don't like it. these are people advocating let the government hold your retirement money because you -- well they're saying 401(k)s don't work. rich people have different ways of making money. but the 401(k)s let us down. the fact of the matter -- >> what time frame are they using? >> obviously they're using the recent time frame the post crash.

we've had a housing crash. the market has come back -- neil: we've doubled since then. charles: we have. it's not that 401(k)s have failed americans. certain americans have failed themselves. give you an example. 2010, we took out $60 billion from 401(k)s. early. 2011, people took out almost like 58 billion. so if you take the money out of your retirement account guess what, the returns will be a little bit off. >> the flip side whatever spending you get off that might have ameliorated things, but you don't advice advise that? >> no. but here's the thing. home equity loans went down. so we were using our house for a long time. remember prices kept going up. people kept refinancing. our homes were our piggy banks. when that game was over, people started using their 401(k)s as their piggy banks. >> this group doesn't want 401(k)s anymore. like a super social

security thing. >> we want the government to run it. this government only owes $18 trillion. they only spent -- >> a bunch of ious. they rob that. >> social security, the disability fund will be broke next year. >> incredible. >> the idea that the government should do it because you can't do it is from the same mind-set, we need calorie counts. protect people from themselves. it's up to the individuals. we're ignoring the success stories. on my show, i talked about ronald reid. ninety-two. died in vermont. left $8 million. $8 million to a hospital and to a library. $8 million. a regular guy. janitor, maintenance guy. never made a lot of money. invested. had a few losses like lehman. he kept investing and investing. lived a frugal life. if he could park three blocks away and not pay the parking meter, he would do that. you don't have to live

that lifestyle, people can change their lives with the patience he had. >> well any good tip for us? >> my stock of the day is sonic. now, the people that watch my show on a regular basis are already up 15%. look at that chart. they report after the bell. this is why i love these guys. they introduced the new soda line that they added candy too. >> they added candy to a soda. >> this is the nonpc company. don't worry go to sonic. a bacon cheeseburger with 1300 calories. 700 grams from fat. 92% of daily allowance for iron. >> they're also putting tobacco in all our tacos. >> but people have a choice. >> that stock is on fire. americans still want a choice. >> to everything there is balance. >> there is. >> and -- that's what i hear. that's what i hear. charles always good, my friend. in the meantime, so much for that temporary run up in oil.

guess what is following that stuff you are pumping. so how low do we go? the guy who knows to the penny after this. and by now you know starbucks is no longer, well racing together. what you don't know is where the reason why is.

>> thirty-five-dollar oil gas sinking to a buck a gallon. oil prices are slip sliding again. gas will be slip sliding even faster. how much faster, and ultimately how much lower? the oil expert says we could indeed get below $2. that would be the easy part. the tougher part i guess is getting to the 1 dollar level. right? >> well that's exactly right, neil. i mean, there is oil it seems everywhere in the world with us production

continuing to increase in spite of a declining rig count. more oil is coming out of saudi arabia and russia. >> what's driving it besides the supply issues? maybe globally things are slowing down. maybe that's hurting europe or latin america. the russian region. this is a worldwide phenomenon. >> well, it is a worldwide phenomenon. but it's driven by the supply increases here in north america, and to a lesser extent less demand in europe and japan. in russia, the biggest effect, they're going into a recession the declining value of the ruble that's going to cause more exports out of russia adding to an already oversupplied market. >> play this out for me now. in the near term, for a while oil was jumping again, gas prices were rising. that quickly reversed itself. it's been gyrating. what do you see happening? >> well, right now

we're at $46 a barrel. in the next couple of weeks, $40 a barrel as inventories here in the us continue to rise to 80-year highs. if we break below $40, the next is 34. we continue to see increases in oil production here in the us such by the time we get to next fall, the whole world can come under greater pressure on oil prices, and you might see below $30 a barrel resulting in really cheap gas prices. neil: that could be devastating for opec. not that many americans will shed a tear for that. but it could destabilize countries over there. right? >> exactly. you don't want to see social unrest in nigeria. of course the saudis have a lot of money in reserves. they can outlast this. a number of other countries they are seriously at risk with these lower revenues. >> all right. we'll watch. andy, thank you. good seeing you. >> thank you for having

me. >> in the meantime, you're welcome america. we told you firsthand how race and starbucks together might be better named let's jump off the cliff together. put a lid on it. make it a memory. starbucks did. coincidence. we think not!

♪ >> this bust because of us? what the starbucks. that's power. and we must be percolating. that whole race together thing, put a lid on it. because the frappe folks are done with it. they say they're moving on with the race debate, maybe because customers were vowing, well, not to step into their stores. or maybe because one of those customers a hefty and cavuto producer, no less was right here on

this show bemoaning its caffeinated nonsense. all she wanted was a grand latte hold the sugar. now howard schultz says hold the whole writing on cups thing. let's say odd timing. and, by the way, you're welcome, america. here to thank me personally. star of "strange inheritance," "unpacked" "unpacked." "money" with melissa francis. what do you think of this? >> if they handed me a cup with race together. i've already worked out today. what do you want to run to? what are you talking about? this didn't make any sense. >> now, we were told that schultz was warned, a lot of people are in a rush to get coffee. >> i don't believe it. my theory is, you know how the ceos get larger than life. he's had so many successes. he's an icon, people love him. i think he's surrounded

by yemen. iyes men. i was doing yoga in the alps. and it's wonderful. and he doesn't have anyone around him who is going to say listen to me boss, this is the worst idea you've ever had. and people will immediately -- they'll think twice. you're standing on the door and you're like you know, i don't want to be bothered. >> i'll debate this thing another time. >> somewhere else. >> apparently the knee-jerk reaction was not a lot of sales. people said i don't need the hassle. >> i can't wait to see the sales numbers. i think a lot of people moved on. it's not polite to discuss religion and politics at the dinner table. the coffee bar is the same thing. it's not polite. >> is there a method to this madness? he's out there seen as a caring capitalist. >> do you think he's running for president? >> i have no idea.

>> some people have said that. i think the shareholders should be furious because they should be focused on buying coffee. i want to see if there was a dip. they claim it was only supposed to go on only a week. >> until we brought it to everyone's attention. now everyone wants to know neil, what is your starbucks drink of choice? that's right. it's monday. this is the kind of personal stuff all of america wants to know. all right, customers, this bar east ais here to share. no lectures just answers. we get brewing after this.

>> what's the deal neil? neil: and it's monday. you know what that means. >> it's ask neil anything monday on what's the deal neil. if you got questions neil got answers. only on the fox business network. if you don't get it, demand it!

neil: now unfortunately, we don't have time for anything else. starbucks no longer race together. a lot of you were getting burned. jt in florida won't be going to starbucks anymore. so neil what is your beef with starbucks wanting to get a dialogue going? getting it going at 6:30 in the morning, eleanor. >> you strike me as a dunkindunkin' donuts guy anyway. does it matter what they're doing? >> no it doesn't. gasparino says you order pumpkin lattes with whipped cream. gasparino is lying. sometimes i order them with no whipped cream or buy caramel frappucino and an umbrella. it depends on the mood i'm in that day. nancy wonders why i obsess about the debt so much. give it a rest. we have the debt for

quite a while. so calm down. you calm down. you might like whistling past the graveyard. i don't. let's say we start getting it under control. wouldn't we just spend that money on something else? potter, that like saying there's no use in paying off your mortgage, you'll only spend it on something else. wouldn't you like the freedom of deciding that yourself and not be shackled to payments you cannot escape? paul fears the consequences if we don't liberate ourselves. it is not a question of if but when the debt crisis will take place. then victor asks what makes me such an expert. let me guess, you went to harvard. and like obama, you know what's best for us. no victor, i didn't go to harvard. but i do know what's best for us. you're half right. if potus is the example of the typical college professor professors are paid too much. some professor his students overpay for

their education. jamie: so neil, let's say we love you in arizona. would you come to our flagstaff women's picnic? can't help with expenses. we'll take you to the grand canyon on sunday. how can i frame this, jamie. it would depend on what you're serving because i've already been to the grand canyon. rick if you're going to have a panel to bash millennials, shouldn't you at least have a millennial on to defend themself? i'm a 34-year-old millennial and i volunteer. no rick. i only want to hear from grumpy young women. if you're young and restless on msnbc, they'll book anyone. ron runs to my vocal defense. what's the deal with all the voice haters out there? i love your voice. how can people be so personal and insensitive to someone despite your i always at ms and all your i ills.

keep up the good work you do for all the lovers neil. thank you so much. (?) then there's walker in watch at awichita falls. i thoroughly enjoy your segments. great deal of humor and satire. most importantly truth. i don't know if you've given any thought to this but if you have go for it. and if not, go for it. what i'm suggesting strongly is a compilation much your common sense scripts. i did just that a few years back with your money or your life. my second book that was a compilation of some of the more controversy, sometimes moving common sense and essays i've written. a follow-up is long overdue. my publishers are always demanding ka-ching. ron out of washington won't be camping out of any bookstore waiting for it. you're getting closer in letting each person talk

without interruption but you have a long way to go. you however are the one who is the most rude, the one who interrupts others the most. when will you grow up, become an adult let your guests answer the questions you ask of them without an interruption? well as soon as you stop watching ron. then i'll stop it all. kip, aren't you afraid when you tell viewers to go that they'll take you up on it and you'll have no viewers? well if it means i have no viewers like them, i'm the better for it. i'd like to think you are too. andy: you said you were half italian -- all the time i thought you were half italian and half-assed. that's why i put your email near the end of the batch, andy. it was only half-assed. wait not that kennedy. neil, what did you give up for lent? viewers who ask that kind of questions. alexis, neil, do you

think the world will end in the next few years? i'm not god. sorry to let you down. speaking of which, you warned us about -- you warned us about obamacare. you were right. you warned us about stimulus, you were right. if only you were around right before the kennedy assassination, you might have changed history. well, imagine, betty. just imagine. brady in georgia: neil, did you beg your wife to marry you? no brady, she came along quite willingly after i uncustody uncuffed her. neil, we don't negotiable sweating savings so much. live and let live, we say. so what does the cavuto say? what does the cavuto say? more like what does the fox say because what you do -- think about it. any brilliant financial mind would say, you're not saving. you're suffering. maybe not now. but sooner rather than

later, you're going to start thinking about it. because right now you're young and restless. pretty soon, you'll be old and penniless. i won't let that happen, kids. not on my watch. "strange inheritance" starts now. jamie: a cowboy inherits a baron patch of prairie. >> it is not big enough. >> beneath the soil he finds prehistoric treasure. >> this is one of the most important discoveries of this century. >> this is a job -- will this cow poke's "strange inheritance" lead him to a boom or bust? >> lightning does not strike in the same place very often maybe never