you're just inviting voter fraud. it seems like common sense. so rare. ron: i admire you lou for telling it like it is. with that, join us tomorrow night. thank you for the kidney kind words good night. >> i'm neil cavuto. low budget carrier. high anxiety crash. stop me if you've heard this one before. because it has happened again. so much we still don't know about this germ winggermanwing flight. it was a discount airline belonging in this case to la tunes aairlines. (?) let me be clear both germanwings and lufthansa have impeccable records. details are very sketchy. it comes little more than seven weeks after this discount carrier trains asia jet crashed

seconds after exit from taiwan. it killed 48 of the 58 pima board. only three months after an indonesia airasia route from indonesia to singapore crashed into the waters killing all 155 passengers and seven crew members. then the two crashes malaysia airlines. one that disappeared on radar last march yet to be found. and another just a few months later. that was shot down over eastern ukraine. now malaysia air can't be faulted for getting shot down. but it has been faulted for flying over a known war zone in a budget minded effort to save on fuel rather than take a longer route around the ukraine en route. there have been other incidents other accidents, and not all involving discount carriers. but it's happened enough to give season pros

pause. to michael boyd. aviation attorney. michael, to you first. this issue keeps coming up. are you concerned? we have a discount carrier here, or is the record as such in this case that it isn't germane? >> oh, it's about as safe as you can get. get. lufthansa owns the airlines. you can't compare it to transasia airlines. they're totally different animals. the asia crash, a lot of weather that could have been involved. just because it's charging a low fare, it doesn't mean it's low quality. they're out there but this isn't one of them. >> it's where you go, not what you fly. >> it is. i think there's more of a difference between foreign airlines and domestic airlines in various countries, in fact. i agree with michael.

you know, we get this picture of a budget airline being held together by duct tape. that's not the case. >> then we go back to the times of valujet or when american eagle wasn't up to speed. but you don't think that's the case. >> i don't think that's the case. we're looking at all these different crashes. we're looking at a lot of different causes of these crashes. no common thread in all of this. >> if there's a common thread that meme get people get leery to fly. i don't want to get into statistics of how safe to fly. it appears it's riskier abroad than here. is that fair? >> i would think so. ever since the valujet debacle, we haven't had anything in the u.s. if you're on a scheduled passenger airline within the us, and within the eu, you'll be safe. other areas in the country. how many people in america know what transasia is? most people don't know who they are.

i'd state of off of e is this demand for flying worldwide the airlines are in the driver's seat no pun intended, in the cockpit. that is the one thing, accidents will remain the force in play here. what do you think? >> absolutely. >> i think that's true. but there's a lot of other variables. you have the variables of the infrastructure itself. is there a radar in asia the same way there's radar in the united states? is there the type of air traffic control in africa the same way in the united states? that's why those continents have much -- >> it's always mentioned in these type of accidents the threat of terrorism seems to be more pronounced abroad than it is here. tougher here to pull some nasty stuff than it is there. i don't know if you concur with that. but it gets more scrutiny in events like this. what do you think? >> it gets more scrutiny. don't buy into this safe that we're safe because

there hasn't been another incidence since 9/11. if a terrorist will do anything, you can do it on any airline out there. this flight to barcelona doesn't have the profile that a terrorist would look at. i'm not saying it couldn't happen. it's higher profile things that a terrorist would go after. >> the lock veer flight, that didn't seem like a terrorist target. (?) it's your sense that fliers watching this show, listening should be doing anything differently? what? >> i would try to stay with a bigger carrier. luffans awas a bigger carrier. but stay away from the asia area and indonesia. >> but you wouldn't put western europe in that camp? >> not at all. >> in the meantime, as soon as word of today's crash got out. airline stocks were getting hit and hit hard. it always happens when this stuff happens.

after 920 deaths last year are we being too cavalier or focusing on airline's booming demand. gary, what do you think is going on here? >> as far as the airline industry, i think they have everything going good for them. they have energy prices cut in half. they -- in the us, 13 billion in fees in the last year. then you have the merger slash, consolidations where competition is down. capacity is down, and they're able to keep up. add those three up, you have a trifecta of big profits for the industry. >> is that still the wind that the industry is back yet? how do you play airline stocks in general snrks >> everything gary said i agree with. that nickel and diming on the fees, they did that because they weren't making money. energy prices are the second biggest expense to an airline other than individuals and

personnel. so, you know, when you're able to nickel and dime to make up for those fees during a bad economy now you have the perfect situation. they bought already oil for 2017. already bought those. now people can say looking out in the future, we have an understanding of what our expenses will be. and they're a lot lower. they can go in and believe it or not buy more airplanes at lower rates because the rates are lower. everything is working in their favor. having said that, the second we see energy prices ticking up, shorten the sector. they've risen too fast and they look too rosy. that's not a good thing. >> that's their biggest event when it's all said and done. normally the sector feels the effect of an accident or crash if there are multiple events because then it brings into question, i think this particular airbus was 24 or 25 years old. now that is not unusual

in the airline industry these days but it does give people pause, and they start saying, all right, what carrier has the newest planes and safer planes? is that warranted from where you are looking at it as an investment? >> first off, the a320. the plane that crashed i think it takes off once every two seconds around the globe. so there is a lot of confidence in it. >> right. >> look, as far as airlines go, safety-wise, 2013 was the best year ever. excuse me. since 1945. '14, not as good. one of them was actually shot down. so safety is the utmost, but unless we see a lot of it happening, it's in the news all the time, i don't think it affects people making the decisions. that said, if we start to see one type of plane in trouble, a few too many times people get online and start looking at what type of planes are being flown.

that would enter the playing field. >> ed, do you agree with that? >> well i agree with it. and there's -- you know, the thought process should be, the companies that do the best are the ones that will be rewarded. bottom line to all of this is, stick with the better quality names. i flew a hungarian airline a few years ago. i was scared to death. i wouldn't buy that stock. i will buy other stocks that are refurbishing and putting new planes in the system. i'll buy the higher quality ones and stay away from the lower quality stocks. >> thank you very much. in the meantime, you think you've seen the last of this guy? analyzing instant chat i had with him, maybe not. ♪

♪ >> well, ted cruz got a first, but let's just say the texas senator will not not not be the last. upwards of over a dozen prominent republicans are ready to join him to the race to the white house. a crowded race. many in the g.o.p. worry could leave the potential nominee beaten up. but mitt romney saying it will all be good fort party. romney: there will be ten or 15 people on the stage. >> how do they do that? >> it will be difficult in the beginning. it will narrow down as time goes on. we'll have a lively debate with very different views being expressed by different candidates. compare that with the democrats. you look at it now, there will be hillary and a couple of other people vying to be her vice president. it won't be exciting.

i'd rather come out of our primary process, engaged, energetic. >> it can be a piñata. everyone was gunning for you. every debate it seemed like, you know, you were the hit. romney: that's not all bad, you know. it's not all bad -- neil: they cut down to avoid that. romney: they've cut down because they recognize if you have 20 debates like we did the people will stop tuning in. all you'll hear is some little attack that came along. (?) it won't help anybody. they're trying to narrow the debates down. neil: the attacks continue. romney: sure. neil: rand paul, the very night cruz announced said he was throwing red meat out there. >> you'll see attacks between these candidates talking about their respective positions. hopefully it's kept aboveboard and true to the merits. you'll find a very aggressive series of

campaigns. the result will be our nominee will be battle tested. enthusiastic. energetic and will be able to to take -- >> or badly bloodied. they're already breaking the reagan rules. romney: yeah. neil: whether it's cruz or paul with all deference to you, we don't want another romney or mccain. romney: well they're entitled to make their case. and people will listen to those arguments and figure who they want to represent the republican party. neil: what they're saying is don't trust moderates. romney: well one person's moderate is another person's liberal. everybody has their views as to who is conservative. i believe the candidates who are running in the republican primary are almost without exception are conservatives. romney: is jeb >> is jeb bush. >> sure he's a conservative. big difference between what people say and what they do. as we look at the people

running for their nomination, we hear not just their words but also look at their record. you know, when you're hiring someone for a job, when you're looking for someone to let's say build a home for you or paint your home. you don't hear what they have to tell you you call some people that actually worked for them and see what they've done before. in this case we can look at the records of people who want to become nominee see what they've done, that will speak louder than their words. neil: i took a look that if anyone entered who has been rumored to be entered. ben carson. jeb bush. chris christie. scott walker. you're doing 16 names. now, you have around 2400 delegates. they haven't finalized this. you need half plus one to be the nominee. can you envision a situation where they get to ohio and they don't have a nominee. romney: is that possible? yes. is it likely? no.

it's possible, of course, because with so many candidates and each appealing to different voices within the republican party, you could see someone winning iowa and a different person winning new hampshire. by the way that's always been the way it's been. iowa and new hampshire never voted together or at least in my memory. then you go on south carolina. that could be someone knew. nevada someone knew. neil: if they're apportioned by votes in primaries following out, you could get new situations. which begs the issue from your statement when you said you wouldn't run, i caught the paragraph near the end, governor, where you said i've been asked and will certainly be asked again if there are any circumstances that might develop that change my mind. that seems unlikely. accordingly i'm not organizing a pac and taking donations. i'm not hiring a campaign team. i caught the line that seems unlikely. romney: it's more than just unlikely. as you suggested, we

have 16 candidates. we may have 16. mostly viable. >> can we get to the convention without a nominee. >> the people who got those delegates would come together and choose one themselves and not look outside. there's no realistic -- >> some going quite far back. some back to abraham lincoln. and you were there for that. >> yeah. john mccain -- >> multiple ballots. right? and in some cases went outside the petri dish of the established candidates, would you entertain the party coming to you and saying, governor we're at a draw here. romney: first, that won't happen. two, i'm not an entertainer. and three, that was a long time ago that happened. look we'll have our nominee among one of those people. whether chris christie, jeb bush, marco rubio scott walker, lindsey graham, john kasich, i mean these are all very

capable solid -- >> there are a lot of those guys who were bummed out when you said you would run. i'm wondering whether it wipes out. you're saying never never never? >> it's just not going to happen. >> so that will never never -- >> it won't happen. there's no realistic circumstance under which that would happen. >> no realistic so he could still run. anyway i think that was the answer. meanwhile not all republicans are happy about ted cruz jumping in. many are worrying that he will take the party too far to the right. in other words the opposite of mitt romney where they said he was too much in the middle. anyway the multi millionaire former republican gubernatorial candidate weighing in on this. you argue it's about getting the priorities right. what do you mean by that? >> it's about getting back to some of the basics again. our education system is a mess. we've got -- we've got a foreign policy that is a total disgrace. i mean -- i just don't understand how the man

can get up in the morning -- neil: you're talking about president obama. >> i'm talking about him. >> who do you see karl, it could be the dozen or maybe more vying for the white house. who intrigues you early on? >> walker right now. >> why? >> he's been in battle. you can count on him in your foxhole when you turn around. he won't bolt and leave. he's a fighter. and i think that's what the american people want. they want real leadership. real leadership. leads from the front. and this guy he's showing his leadership. ran three times here. neil: yeah, he did. every other year it seemed he was running. because of the recalls. i'm wondering karl, these guys need money to keep the oxygen in the tank. keep moving, moving. if the argument is that walker is getting bush is getting, to a lesser extent marco rubio cruz is not getting it. those who send money in small increment alwaysals, the

passion crowd, they'll give money, but that's tough. right? you need a lot of it. >> yeah and it surprised me the big 50 family is okay. got together and just jumped on to jeb bush's bus, okay? they're not considering the changes taking place. >> you think bush would lose? >> i don't think bush is the strongest candidate we can put up. i think we can do much better. we have to engage the right. this republican rino establishment, okay, that thinks that they can think making a call -- >> but you hedge your bets there. walker is not the tea party. i mean they like him. but you're not gravitating to the cruzs or the rand pauls. i don't think the american people are looking so much at the issues okay, that they see. they want a leader. they want a guy that is going to lead them from, as i said, come on, boys let's go. let's go and get this done.

let's get this mission done. somebody that won't go off and is in never never land like the guy we have now. he doesn't like congress. he doesn't like anybody. he doesn't like the american people. and here he is negotiating -- >> but how about you? you've had great success. >> i have 550 employees. great majority of them are struggling. it's not a healthy environment. but they go to work every day. they want fairness. and whether you're a republican or a democrat, okay, you have to bring these people along with you. neil: find the guy who can draw that crowd. >> we need a guy that can create jobs. that understands the meaning of creating jobs and doesn't necessarily side with the 1% against the 99%. i mean, the republican base that's there, many of them didn't come out for romney. i mean, they didn't vote. neil: yeah. >> and that hurt him. you think they learned a lesson. neil: they might have.

karl, always good seeing you. stick to his guns. stay with his roots. you just heard from mitt. hear from the guy who wants to fight mitt. this you have to hear.

♪ neil: all right, well the white house is still upset. my god, these guys are like my mother-in-law. let it go. but there is no kidding when it comes to this white house refusing to let bygones be bygones when it comes to netanyahu. now blasting him for dissing arabs who call israel home. and complete hat trick of tedious attacks. the white house ginning up reports that israel spied on those iran nuke talks. israel says that didn't happen. but i clearly see what's happening. a president whose nose is out of joipt joint and still refuses to shut up

and sit down. cavuto alert for you guys. in case you didn't here isis al-qaeda, and boko haram are doing joint exercises and you're bitching about bb. really? let's just say israel really did spy on our talks with iran. frankly can you blame them? no scratch that. they are in the neighborhood and kind of have a vested interest in these iran deal and how it turns out. after all, we can har ump about a deal that makes sense to us. israel is in easy missile shot if it does not. that's what's called having skin in the game. save the lectures for the iranians who need them and not the israelis who are doing their damnedest not to get obliterated by them. you went over leaders heads in iran to sell your spiel, so don't get

high and mighty when israel goes over yours. they're dead if you screw up, after all. now you can retire after this and make speeches whether you do or do not. all right, columnist extraordinaire, this guy gets it. john. on that and the scandal the administration and the ongoing -- my god, let it go. >> well look. if israel says it did not spy on the talks that is entirely plausible. i would for us. there are six nations in the talks. we know at least that the french are very skeptical about them. aa lot of points of echo -- >> we lecturing people on spying is a bit rich. >> and israel is not spying to get commercial advantage or to find out things about what we're doing so they can get military information. they're trying to find out what will happen with the iranian nuclear program and what kinds of concessions we'll

make in that regard. in that sense it's entirely in their national interest. they have to know. and the wall street journal story that created this kerfuffle today makes it very clear that the administration is less upset that israel spied on the united states than that the israelis gave information to members of congress whom the administration desperately is trying to keep out of the loop. >> right. >> because the administration has a three-pronged idea. don't tell congress. don't let congress vote on the deal. and make the deal stick until after he leaves office. all three on an international deal involving matters that congress has legislated on sanctions that congress has passed and the future security of the united states -- >> no you're right. valid on each and every point, john. my only issue is, whatever your beef with netanyahu, first of all, keep it private. when the president relayed what he told

netanyahu in the phone call. i thought that was pretty weird. but it's happening again and again and again. >> right. but i think this is a false flag. i think this is an act of misdirection. the president is focusing on netanyahu trying to make it a bb versus barack fight. in order to distract the nation from the coming nuclear deal. he wants less attention on that. congress to pay less attention. >> are you kidding? >> you're giving him far too much credit. he's cunning but i don't know about that cunning. you've studied this for years. here's what i fear is going on. i think he is trying now to get maybe a nobel peace prize going or even mitt romney says that any deal, a bad deal would be, you know sort of very nice for the administration. very nice for hillary clinton. and that's their interest here. >> remember, congress there's two potential pieces of legislation. congress is thinking about enacting right now next week, you know, as early as next week, in relation to iran and the

coming deal. the president is trying i believe, and the white house wants less attention on the deal and more attention on the notion -- >> then it has to be a bad deal. >> well, of course, it is a bad deal. >> why are they so hot to trot to do it? >> well they believe that bringing iran into -- under some kind of an aegis agreement is a safer thing -- >> so did neville chamberlain thought with hitler. >> that would be the analogy that i would draw. in their defense, their argument is, this is the way of bringing iran into the unity of nations. giving them a liquid quid pro quo. >> and tit-for-tat -- >> he hates him, loathes him, despises him but it's useful because it changes the subject as the negotiations go down to the wire. >> wow. all right. john, we shall see. always good seeing you

you. in the meantime here's what you need to know about the difference between the democrat's latest budget and the republican's latest budget. the republicans may be taxing, but the democrats just is a a lot of taxes.

>> insane. it's enough to make zane want to puke. not literally. he's not happy. house democrat budget that calls for $1.8 trillion in taxes. trillions more in new spending. zane says a new way to tanko the economy. i played off his name. this is all basic cable. my gift to you. a plan that is very big on the side of the democrats to raise taxes more than the president wanted. >> i have to be careful neil. as a businessman the knee-jerk is no taxes. the knee-jerk is no more taxes. but in this environment this time, almost since the day this president took office businesses have been under siege. he can spit out all the

statistics and all the data that he wants. neil: right. >> the reality is that people are earning less, the reality is more people are out of -- neil: you're doing well. businesses are doing better. he'll come right back at you, zane, at you and say, well, if i'm a wet blanket, you're doing graduate. >> it'sgreat. >> it's the american ingenuity. we're inching out of this recession of '7, '8, '9. we could be booming. >> don't be big on taxes and spending. they used the tax code to do what? >> they used it to penalize you and hurt you. you don't take his health care, you'll pay a penalty. you don't -- you don't do anything to hit you with taxes. >> the taxes is seen as a punitive, a weapon. make it a friend. >> exactly. >> incentivize people to go back to work. i read an article about

a guy who earned a little more money than he thought he did. the result they used the tax code to turn around and penalize him for his affordable health care. the subsidies he thought he was getting he found he owed money. he's not getting money for the health care. >> stop these things. >> right. incentivize people to hire people. innocent sizeincentivize people to retrain people. >> there's none of that in the republican budget. >> i don't know if it's republican or democrat. but what's right for the country. >> just stop the weapons stuff. right? >> stop the weapons. stop using it as a bludgeon. >> what about a flat tax? the tax code couldn't be used to coddle different groups. >> you know, neil, i'm not that smart, and i didn't give it that much thought. here's what i know -- >> you own like 8000 restaurants. you're pretty smart, but go ahead. and you eat like there's no tomorrow and you stay

thin. but i digress. >> i do know as a businessman white blood who is a recipient of this measure it hurts business. and forget the restaurant industry. as you well know, i'm the director of an old fields company. i'm a director of several other industries. if you're in business, stop demonizing business. the only way we become what we once were is through the private sector. big business -- >> what do your colleagues and buddies say across those different fields and thieves the market double. in some cases triple. they say we're backfiringbackfiring on all cylinders. >> i don't think you can credit this president with anything. this president knew how to get elected president. he did that very well. >> with the markets we had nowhere to go, but up. >> that he did well. it's like i want to be a jet fighter pilot. i just never flew an

airplane before. i'm not sure you want to be my copilot. that's playing with lives as a fighter pilot. well he's playing with lives every single day. and i think he goes down in history -- he's just concerned about his legacy, and i think his legacy will really be told when he's out of office and you really see what we uncover and the damage that he has done to this economy, to the infrastructure. i think the psyche of the american people is not engagement, not work force not work-related not inventive as we've always been it's morphing towards relying upon a government for health care. relying upon a government for my raises. for increases. >> and all bad in your eyes. right? >> not in my eyes it's reality. >> thank you zane. zane metro ceo when is being underwater on your mortgage a good thing? a lot more americans are underwater. what they're doing. actually a lot of good

things. then a man finds an old map that turns out to be worth a ton. how much? find out on tonight's "strange inheritance." 9:00 p.m. right here on fbn.

♪ neil: underwater and overspending. millions of homeowners now own more on their mortgage than their home is worth. we've been making progress on this. all of a sudden we're reversing this. they're spending more to spruce that home up and get the value up. so i argue that's not a problem. here's what is, more are using credit cards taking out loans to do this. rachel cruz says getting into more debt won't help anybody. jared levy says to improve your asset like your home, it could be beneficial. you're not buying that, right, rachel. >> when you're taking on more debt, you're getting more risk.

save up and pay for those remodels versus depending on a credit card for it. >> you have the time -- see, the problem comes at the time. right now we're seeing record rent rates across the u.s. spending on home improvements in 2,016,324,000,000000, an all-time high. bigger than the booms in early 2000s here's the key. right? (?) consumers can stock away more in savings. they can leverage using credit cards, spruce up that house and either, a, sell it in this how the market or, b rent it out and bring in nice income. with an asset that keeps up with inflation it makes sense to spend when the market is healthy. right now, it's healthy. >> i understand your concern. i generally would agree with your posture. it's more different than buying a camaro or a shopping spree whatever you're investing in or buying is going into an asset you hope to appreciate. you don't buy that

though? >> well, no. i mean, that is true. when you are investing in your home, ideally yes, you'll see that return on investment. but you won't get that right away. and i think it's great that consumers are feeling confident in the economy. that's great. but i want your financial plan to work in the good times and the bad. and, again taking on more debt, you're taking on more risk. if something were to happen you put a lot of risk out there. i would rather you save up and pay for it. >> you know jared, the flip side is you sound like barack obama. right? you're strategically investing money you technically don't have. i know you have a lot of money. that's a moot point. but i see where you're strategizing that sounds very much like the way democrats sell a program in congress. >> let's think about it the other way. what happened when people lost their jobs? they had nothing. right? here's the logic. you have more money stocked away in savings. if you lose your job, god forbid you have this credit card debt. you declare bankruptcy. wipe that debt away. keep some of your savings. whatever you have.

and you have this asset. you have this home. you have appreciating sort of account that will roll and maybe bring you some income. or you can sell that and have emergency cash. so i think it makes sense. >> you guys are so good. i agree we with with her. no i agree with him. i'm lost. but guys, thank you very much. >> thanks, neil. >> all right, well mitt is taking him on in the ring. and now holyfield is ready to take me on here. let's get ready to kind of rumble. ♪

♪ neil: all right, what would they call this the politico versus the puncher? not as silly as you

think. if muhammad ali could fight a wrestler in the ring, why not evander holyfield in the ring? mark it down. may 15th. one of these two guys are going down. don't assume just because holyfield shook off mike tyson he can brush off the storming mormon. ear chopping is allowed. you've heard from me. now it's time to hear from the champ himself. no man has as many boxing belts or coveted titles or surprised people in the ring as much as evander holyfield has. so good to have you. how did this thing with romney come about? >> well he asked me. and i thought it was a great idea because the fact of the matter is, it's about helping someone else. you know, of course you know me as a kid if anybody helped me i probably wouldn't be the person i am. so a lot of people out there will get their

sight restored. 40,000. this is a great situation. neil: right. it's a charity. one by a friend of his that grew into this. hey, why don't you get evander holyfield. but you're not a guy who i would want to do an exhibition charity event with because you'd kill me. does he know that you'll take this seriously? >> well, you know i'm a -- i'm showing him what to do. you know, i'm a good guy. i'll make sure he's a good guy. in the process of this working everybody will be happy. and these -- these or people will get their eyesight. >> is it a three-round? how will you guys do it? >> we'll do one round. i'll show him how to jab. you hit my hand now. you hit my hand. not my face. hit my hand.

you know, i'm going to help him out. it's really not that hard. but it can be competitive. it will be good for the people. neil: i think this should be required of all presidential candidates. president or former. they should all get in the ring with you. what do you think? >> well, ultimately, you know i'm a good guy to get in with. you may get the best guy. i'm the best guy to get in. i'm not going to take you out. neil: although you could. i want to get your thoughts, thank you for joining us a couple weeks ago about this mayweather and pacquiao coming up. the revenue is coming in. close to $400 million now. this is obscene. do you think these guys are worth it? >> well, i think -- i think so. you know, if you've been doing something since ever since you've been the age of four, which mayweather and both these guys, they are the best. now, they're getting paid that money because of something that they've done. neil: yeah.

>> and that's the reason people are paying that money to go out and see them. neil: you actually started this whole trend of guys still boxing a little older being in peak shape, a little older, but maybe in a way that's a bad thing because one of them can get badly hurt. >> well, you know, not these guys. these guys are the best. these are guys that take care of themselves. what a lot of people don't understand about floyd mayweather he takes care of himself. manny takes care of himself too. so you have two athletes that in their late 30s who probably could fight someone 50 years old. >> don't give them any ideas, evander. thank you, my friend. i look forward to the bout with the storming mormon.

>> what's the deal, neil? >> and what is the deal with a health care law now five years old still bleeding. and when it's all said and done will still

leave 30 million americans uninsured. wasn't that the idea of upending the entire health care system to make sure everybody is the in the system. time and again democrats said we would cover everyone and it would be worth it. now it's not. to mark the five-year anniversary of obamacare we need to check on that little kid standing next to the president signing the bill and see if he's able to log on to the website and select a -- sounds too good to be true. it is. manny: thank god you're a nerd, neil.

you saw it, warned everybody about it. my only fear now is that you'll get a big head. but i see i'm too late on that. hysterical, manny. you're the best neil. the best what, i'm not so sure. tommy: congressman steven lynch was one of the only democrats to vote against obamacare. the reason for his vote i read it. then to another controversy getting more controversial. the illegal immigration mess. 30,000 convicted felons who go missing. now those with serious rap sheets aren't being deported. what does it take to get kicked out of country? if any illegal immigrant wants to become a citizen and votes republican, obama will have them on the next plane back to wherever they came from. then what the tech, what the tech asked this question. what the tech happened to radio shack now on

the verge of finally being put to rest because no buyer is coming forward. ali writes it's sad but great customer service doesn't mean anything if you have nothing to serve. that's very good, ali. ann, i remember sometime back you said it was the radio in the name. it had relic built into its strategy. pam: neil, this news about radio shack comes as now no surprise to me. in 2016, radio shack didn't participate in christmas. i knew they were on their way out. i didn't check in with them in 2014. so long politically correct ones. i think the political correctness was the least of their problems. don wants to know who i am to offer romance advice to anybody as i do on mondays. cavuto, you look like my mechanic with a shave. no way i'll ask you how to please my wife. good, don because i already told her to leave you. finally keller in

florida: where i come from they call a man who is comfortable talking emotions a wuss. what say you? well, this wuss says you're an idiot. thanks for watching. "strange inheritance" is now. . >> from dusty boxes in the attic. emerge military artifacts handed down across 5 generations. >> writing is unbelievable. >> an heirloom that may be a long lot of lost piece of history. >> i had never seen one before. >> value is rising with everybody fold. >> a war a map a mystery. >> i had a momenttary roller coaster there. >> will it lead to a family's hidden treasure?