it was pretty evenly split. the winner, 41% delusional. thank you for joining us. good night. neil: getting tense airstrikes in yemen heating up and you're about to pay up? yep just as we're getting used to the low oil prices at the pump, the government collapsing half a world away is about to kick us all in the gas. to ty young larry glazer and dan, dan, spell it out. what happens? >> a short-term move in the prices of oil probably at the pumps here too because of the risk they add to prices because they're fighting. we've gone through this for 40 years, this happened in the 70s. same cycle. the problem is that as the fighting escalates that they could start dumping i'm

talking about the middle eastern countries start dumping oil on the market like before. so i'm short oil. neil: we would have a glut of supply? >> which we currently have. neil: this could worsen that? >> if they decide to go that angle isis gets profits from oil, and so do all the other countries, and iran is the one that's heavily involved here. neil: fair enough. >> if they start dumping that could hurt our economy because the united states economy, big sector is energy, and that's going to start here. neil: i hear you, larry, the short lived reaction would be much as it always is a serious dustup in the middle east. immediate reaction is oil prices spike. things would subside for all the reasons you mention. as this escalate and you haves to wonder when the saudis are sending 150,000 of their own troops i didn't know they had 150,000 troops, it escalated to a point thing it's a crisis. that is going to have a booming effect on us.

what do you think? >> no question. the oil markets are nervous at the prospect of a regional conflict. if saudi arabia gets involved in yemen, egypt committed to ground troops. yemen may not be a significant oil producer the region is and yemen has the possibility to shut down a nearby strait responsible for 3.8 million barrels flowing through there. that has the opportunity to disrupt the global supply of energy. it is a fool's errand for the u.s. to reduce domestic ability to produce its own energy and increase dependence on foreign oil. when the only certainty is turmoil in the middle east will increase. that's why the markets are just so jittery. neil: you know what worries me most, not just yemen ties a region wide phenomenon. and the saudi participation tells you that you have a growing concern among the

so-called mainstream muslim crowd, and the nuts that we got to get this under control here. what do you think? ty? >> i don't think there's any question about that neil. and there is a proxy war going on in yemen between iran and saudi arabia. and the saudis are in there attacking the houthis backed by iran. saudis at the same time, and this is complicated because the saudis are trying to hurt iran and russia who backs iran financially by pumping a glut of oil and keeping oil prices down. neil: so short-term, my own view, and you are the experts, as you know i read a prompter so i qualify. my view is short-term prices spike, i don't know for how long, but they spike but play this out. what do you think ty? >> i do think they spike short-term, but at the pump here in the u.s. i think we get to $3, maybe it heads that way longer term closer to $2, the saudis are going to try to

hurt iran by hurting them economically like reagan put the former soviet union, broke them economically. that's what i think the saudis are trying do to iran, and ultimately to backer in russia. that's the play i think, i think oil prices go down as a result of this. neil: we have this world economic recovery, which is still lack luster right? that beats your point. >> what recovery? gdp now by the atlanta fed is .3 what they've updated. neil: that will decide the direction for you? >> absolutely. we're in the early stages. in my opinion, in analysis of a deflationary depression. prices have collapsed. gold collapsed, crude oil down 50. neil: economies before and in that abyss, we had spiking oil prices? >> yes, in 1998 and 1999 crude oil was $10 and we had a booming economy. the tanks and the boats are full of crude oil and rigs throughout this country that are idle. so if there is an interruption of 3 million barrels a day

coming down through yemen, we can put the rigs down to work. the crews are ready to go. we're not going to feel it much here. >> i hope you're right. my own sense larry, is this administration is not friendly to traditional oil, and has made this a primitive environment for that. it might leap at these developments and push solar, wind and the other stuff. they're already reining back fracking. >> the short run, the consumer gets the benefit of the lower energy prices. in the long run, a false sense of security. we pull back the drilling rigs avoid the energy revolution and the renaissance and those jobs layoffs in texas and the dakotas, layoffs in the area that powered this u.s. economy through the recovery. so again in the long run, we're certain that the price of energy will remain elevated as long as geopolitical turmoil is elevated throughout the country, and any type of nuclear deal with iran would

increase that by removing sanctions, allowing the free low of energy from iran, giving them the energy source to increase turmoil and back groups like yemen today. it comes back to home at some level neil. neil: speaking of, which gentlemen, thank you off. the iran nuke deal. it's supposed to send prices lower because it would allow the iranians to sell more oil, half a million more barrels a day. the problem is they have six days left to get a deal done and the u.n. wants to examine the country's nuclear activities and iran is saying no deal to that. all of this makes former u.n. weapons inspector think even if we get a deal done we can't trust the deal. my own betting is they're going to cobble something together but it will be half-ased, what's your sense? >> the reason you want to know what the past programs were in iran is that it's hard to know it's hard to do any risk assessment what we're allowing

them to keep, if we don't have the whole context. we don't know what other technologies, what other equipment they have hidden from the view of the international community into which they could plug the permitted nuclear activities for the purposes of developing a weapon. neil: so iran is coming back and saying you throw this at us now, we got six days to get something together. it's not going to happen. do you think they're bluffing or what? >> it could happen at any instance if the iranians truly want the deal, and it's what have they got to hide if they are indeed going to be on this. the basic deal is they forego nuclear weapons development in order to get sanctions lifted. if that's what they truly want to do why are they having a problem with discussing with the international atomic energy agency the past programs. neil: can i ask a dumb question? why do i get the sense we want this deal than more than the

iranians do? you would think any deal is far more beneficial to them than it will ever be to us. it's upside down, we're the ones who seem to be begging cajoling, leaving people off worldwide terror list just to get something done. what do you say? >> the critics of those who argue that we should hold the iranians to should sort of level of scrutiny would argue what else are you going to do differently? my point is that nuclear weaponry is not a low consequence thing. if we get this wrong the consequences can be very high. we have to have confidence that the iranians are going to stick by their side of the bargain. neil: do you have the confidence? >> their past history is one of lying to the international community about their developments and hiding production facilities from international scrutiny. if you recall in 2009, there was a discovery that they had

facilities built in underground buildings. specifically to avoid international scrutiny. if we're to have confidence in their nuclear activities and they are being developed purely for peaceful purposes then there has to be transparency, then they have to talk to the international inspectors. if they don't i see that as a bad sign. neil: you think we're going to get a deal. say nothing what you think the deal might be you think we'll get a deal? >> the international pressure is very high, and i suspect the pressures will be towards a deal regardless of whether it's a good deal or not. neil: very well put. thank you very much i enjoyed having you. >> thank you very much. neil: if iran is hiding something, republicans are saying now is not the time to cut defense even if it means cutting the sequestration deal the parties greed to in the first place. just a lousy time. i agree on the need to keep us

safe, but come on, a deal is a deal is a deal. this just makes the parties' concern about budgets and sticking to them, some sense of sternness go away. that's what concerns me. what do you say? >> neil the problem is where you cut, and defense is not the place to cut. you just had a bunch of people on talking about the massive instability we have in the middle east right now. neil: walker we give $600 billion a year to defense. believe me i'm all for being vigilant, you know what i mean? >> i think we should give more to defense, neil. i think we should figure out employer mandate with the health care program, that would have a much more profound impact, if we took away the employer mandate with the federal health care act than cutting our defense spending. look, we don't know which way to go in terms of foreign policy. we're trying to negotiate a nuclear deal with iran, in

direct contrast to allies in israel, and president netanyahu who doesn't want us to do anything. even in the face of the fact that if you look at iran in the past, they have not been honest. they've been duplicitous in how they deal with -- neil: i agree with all of the above. >> speeding down this road. neil: $600 billion a year, you can't tell me within that budget you can't prioritize items. >> from an investment standpoint, neil now is not the time to company the middle east is a tinderbox, we're cooperating with iran to fight in iraq with the shiites. neil: you would hand defense a blank check? you would hand defense a blank check? >> i wouldn't hand defense a blank check now is not the time to cut. domestically, we need to reup our independence on oil. we need to make sure that we're developing domestic oil production at all costs. we can't be looking at the market to say, well oil is up

oil is down. neil: i agree with you on that. i'm just saying it is far more a threat to our security longer term, this debt we're piling up and the closest thing i've seen out of congress with a back bone is this idea with sequestration cuts. they weren't great. they weren't in the scheme of things that excessive. if they abandon this, good luck showing fiscal discipline in any area both parties are going to protect vested interests and we will never get anywhere, and we'll be a far greater security threat to ourselves being essentially beggers to the world? >> i have to beg to disagree on that. i think that's a fool's errand to make short-term budget decisions to risk the lives of americans. we've spent billions in the middle east in iraq, to secure afghanistan the president agreed to leave more troops because the afghan president was here in washington. let's find other areas of the budget to cut.

i agree long-term debt is a huge fiscal problem for the united states. neil: you will deal anything with defense. democrats are going to say we want a deal with defense and don't want the entitlement programs cut. you can't find savings in $600 billion, you are not looking hard enough. >> not now, not now. neil: walker good having you just the same. sergeant bergdahl is a deserter. do you feel comfortable with a guy who got that deal? working on a bigger maybe more dangerous deal? lesson learned or lesson burned? we discuss you decide. but first, if you have had it with this world the russians have a ticket for you to leave for a little while. what the heck? space tourism coming back?

people ship all kinds of things. but what if that thing is a few hundred thousand doses of flu vaccine. that need to be kept at 41 degrees. while being shipped to a country where it's 90 degrees. in the shade. sound hard? yeah. does that mean people in laos shouldn't get their vaccine? we didn't think so. from figuring it out to getting it done, we're here to help.

. neil: how's this for perfect timing, getting tired of this world? out of this world deal from russia. space tourism in 2018. we can't send astronauts without hitching a ride usually with them. what the tech is going on here? another slap in the space for us. michael nunez what's going on here, and what are they up to? how much is this going to cost, and all that? >> russia is going to be transporting people to space and this is part of a larger trend you're seeing across the board. a lot of interest in space tourism, private companies are obviously pursuing this. this happens to be a government agency. neil: they made a lot of money doing this a few years ago. >> certainly there's a lot of money in it right now. the idea is over time hopefully that dollar amount will go down and we'll be able to send more people. neil: are they the only ones doing it? some of these others are

looking at that. >> that's right, they are the most prominent government agency doing it right now, but i think within a few years you will see other big players that are sending people relatively quickly. neil: you know companies that are behind this thing? >> that's not my specialty. i don't watch the stock. neil: i tell you why i wouldn't. one accident god forbid, and people just freeze on, this for a long long time. >> yeah, you could they but

. >> yes absolutely. you're seeing computers take over different parts of automobiles, more and more regularly. so to those that are fearful of computers taking over driving let's say, you have to realize

that your car right now is already controlled by computers. antilock brake system, power steering. cruise control there are a number of -- neil: these are the headlights if you look at something on the side, the lights aren't on the road. >> no but the computers are just better, plain and simple they are better than humans. neil: your whole generation just trusts this technology. 2001 space odyssey, they are not opening the pod bay door. >> that's a long way in the future. neil: no, 2001 was 14 years ago. >> that's true. i think that type of stuff is -- neil: you don't think it's a problem? >> it's really not. it's a bridge to autonomous cars, we have 1.3 million people who die per year roughly the size of dallas, you're talking about a major american city, that population is dying per year. neil: how do you know this doesn't kill more people? >> you know i think that technology has proven itself

time and time again as a safer bet than humans. you know, i know a lot of bad drivers and i'm sure you do too. neil: that could make worse drivers. i'm glad to see your faith in the technology. you're young. >> yeah. neil: when we come back can anyone trust the white house with this deal after what happened with well this deal? more bad bergdahl deals than my spiel after this.

the real question that needs to be asked is "what is it that we can do that is impactful?" what the cloud enables is computing to empower cancer researchers. it used to take two weeks to sequence and analyze a genome; with the microsoft cloud we can analyze 100 per day. whatever i can do to help compute a cure for cancer, that's what i'd like to do.

. neil: burn me once shame on you, burn me twice shame on me. thinking about the sergeant bergdahl desertion charge shame on all of us? the guy who made the deal to get bergdahl back here is the same guy secretly negotiating in iran now. the guy who swapped the five militants who is set to do god's what, much the way the

white house is handling the iran nuke talks now. knowing what we do about the last deal, doesn't it give you pause on the white house handling this deal? it would be rewarding the ceo who drove the company into the ditch by paying him still more so he can find another ditch. it wouldn't make good business sense, it makes less political sense and it is zero military sense. to business expert mark serrano who says the president is not inspiring much confidence but julie roginsky says republicans constantly criticizing the president doesn't inspire much confidence either. did i get the gist of the view on this? >> not at all. neil: who should be handling what? >> the administration should be handling both extracting the united states soldier, who else is going to do it? and the administration should be handling any negotiation with iran. neil: in secret? >> yes, in secret. >> you're not at all concerned that the last deal wasn't exactly bright?

>> so the problem with the last deal to me is it was a horrible deal but to me the best of all horrible options and two other options we could have left an american servicemen and i get he may have deserted, looks like he did. we'll find out at trial. he may have deserted and put another men in harm's way some of whom who have died. we have to bring him back because he's an american serviceman and the other option would be to have commandos extract him and put other people -- neil: mark i know in the business world, if a board makes that kind of a screwup, whether it was the least, you know, offensive of all options, the board is not around the ceo is not around. they don't get a chance to screw up again. >> in this case, twisted the board wants the ceo to screw up. president wanted to deal and evaded congressional approval on the gitmo swap.

why? it wasn't about extracting a servicemen, it was shutting down gitmo. this is the same thing. the president has taken for granted the trust of the american people. it's broken. this same guy is cutting a deal with iran in secret, and tell that story to the six -- families of the six servicemen who went looking for bowe bergdahl and lost their lives. neil: are you saying because of this, this one deal that the president shouldn't be negotiating with anyone on anything anywhere? >> the president can't be trusted to president. neil: that's what presidents do. >> the presidents follow the constitution. presidents consult congress. president is going to get the united nations to do the deal. neil: even 367 representatives and democrats, sitting among them, remember this goes through us when all is said and done. >> i agree, and i agree with bob menendez who wants oversight. just because you are unhappy

with the way the election turned out and unhappy -- >> which elections, the 2014? >> the last two presidential elections, you can't say the president can't be trusted because you don't trust them so therefore the president of the united states can bury his head along. neil: he's going to agree with all that said is and done. >> that's a mistake. i agree that's a mistake. but the negotiation needs to emanate as it would in the bush administration or even in this administration from the white house. >> do you want the united nations to approve this deal and not congress? >> i made it clear i want congress to approve this deal. neil: you do not like the united nations. >> p+ 1 is the five security council members and germany. neil: it's okay to have them and congress but not them alone. >> iran is not negotiating with us bilaterally, it's a multilateral negotiation, that's who the negotiating partners are.

neil: congress should have a say when all is said and done you are concerned that will not happen because that was done in secret and this will be. >> the president said he's not planning on consulting congress about this. he's going to go to the united nations to approve a u.s. treaty. it's backwards. >> it's not a treaty. neil: it's confusing. thank you very much. nervously eyeing fellow passengers on the plane, who knew we had to worry about the guy flying it? in one year 5.6 million hospital workers helped perform 26.6 million surgeries deliver 3.7 million babies and treat 133 million e.r. patients. now congress is considering cuts which could increase wait times reduce staff, and threaten your community's health. keep the heart of america's hospitals strong. for you and your family tell congress: don't cut hospital care. ♪ help an oil company overcome minus

47 degree temps, 5 foot ice, and 16 foot waves, to safely keep crude oil flowing 365 days a year. when emerson takes up the challenge it's never been done before simply becomes consider it solved. emerson.

. neil: forget checking people on the plane, who's checking on the guys flying the plane? a copilot andreas lubitz accused of bringing the germanwings plane down and killing all 150 people on board including himself. you can bet flyers are wondering if they have a potential crazy in the cockpit a flight safety pro says this proves we need to vet pilots

better. i thought these guys went through a battery of psychological tests and especially in germany, lufthansa. what are we missing? >> well i don't know that we're missing much. they do go through a battery of testing preemployment, and they have some testing when they come back in for simulator rides but it's more like self-reporting, anything going on in your life that you need to tell us about. so it's a bit of a challenge to try to get a handle on the emotional state of employees in sensitive jobs like pilots. >> john, the immediate reaction on the part of flyers, they're going to be very leery of who's piloting the plane, and we have locked cockpits and all of that post-9/11 to keep the pilots safe from passengers. now it's keeping the passengers safe from pilots. is that overkill, and do you think that people need to be assured that this is truly an anomaly or should they start

better screening pilots everywhere? >> well, i think that we're going to see some increase in the screening of pilots. in this country and in the rest of the world. neil: what would that involve? >> sitting down and talking to people that are trained to try to extract your emotional state out of you, because you might be putting a faceup to shield your problems. so it's going to take professionals to be able to determine the state of mind of our pilots as a whole. and we're walking a fine line here because you don't want to treat your pilots, your professional folks like laboratory rats either. you know? if every time they come in you're going to probe their personal life probe their mind, that's going to get negative comments from the pilots and drive more of our pilots to early retirement or prevent hem from coming in the business at all.

neil: and pay is not keeping up with the headaches, right? a lot of them will say i don't get paid anything like i used to, that is the case for a number of carriers. we don't need this. this type of a new screening process could drive many out of a job, right? >> the low pay has driven a lot out of the job now so it's a delicate balance and it's a difficult situation. neil: what do you think happened here, john? what would you look for? in this pilot's case what are you going to look for? >> i think we need to go very deep into his background and what he's been doing the last few years. you know, typically german airlines take their would-be pilots right out of college and send them to ground school and send them to the u.s. to learn how to fly so they're teaching them their way from the very beginning. it has proven for them to be a very good formula. maybe there's reinforcement

that needs to be made in that process to looked at psychological piece. you know, it's not only just the u.s., not just the u.s. it's around the world where we don't do a very good job with mental health issues. we've seen it here in the u.s. with lots of problems with mass shootings, and we'll that have previous mental health issues, and they're not being dealt with. in this country we don't deal with mental health like a real medical problem. neil: you're right about that. >> it's on the side nobody wants to talk about it. it's over here. look, forget about it. neil: you're right. remember rosalynn carter when she was making that a big issue and kept running into a lot of brick walls. john, thank you very much. >> thank you for having me. neil: meanwhile you default, you don't drive. the push to make sure kids pay their loans or might lose their licenses. who says hoarding is a waste of time, two actors receive a

very very strange inheritance right here after me. it's more than a network and the cloud. it's reliable uptime. and multi-layered security. it's how you stay connected to each other and to your customers. with centurylink you get advanced technology solutions, including an industry leading broadband network, and cloud and hosting services - all with dedicated responsive support. with centurylink as your trusted technology partner you're free to focus on growing your business. centurylink. your link to what's next.

. neil: get off the road. 22 states have the right to take driver's license away from student loan borrowers if they default on their loans. thank god. joe tacopina says no no joe why is it illegal? >> not only illegal it's ridiculous. it really is. when you think about it, the government is using power to scare debtors to repay loans without regard for their ability to do so. now there are some people who legitimately can't catch up to the student loans student loans are not free. they have enormous interest rates. neil: like what? >> most of them have onerous interest rates. people who legitimately can't pay the student loans, there's a proper way to deal with that

collection agencies interest rates additional garnishing wages, but taking a license away, first of all, when you think about it what you're doing there is perhaps hindering their ability to earn income to pay the loans off. in iowa they suspended 900 driver's license last year, in a rural place that's ridiculous. >> criminal defense attorney, sentencing, says to the judge your honor, if you put my client in jail he won't be able to pay the money back. you know what the judge's response is? you should have thought about that before you did it. by the way, by the way, by the way -- right off the bat, joe, joe, nine months before they do that. >> wait. >> you're telling me to take it easy? >> you commit a crime, you know the possibility is you go to jail. that you know when you commit the crime. when you sign up for a student loan. when you're doing that you're not on notice, that by the way, if you have a hard time you become disabled if you can't

catch up on student loan payments, you lose right to drive. how is driving license related to debt. neil: having the effect of making sure the kids don't do that? >> there's other ways to do, it don't forget student loans are like any other sort of debt is not dischargeable in bankruptcy court. they are onerous, they will stay with you for life. neil: why are so many kids just -- what? >> if they're doing it they're stupid. not only can you take away the driver's license, you can take away professional licenses. neil: why are you breaking his arm? >> he doesn't let me talk. >> you can take a professional license away. you can't repay a student loan. we're going to take your medical license away now. >> what has this country come to? borrow money, the day of i shake your hand i take something from you and going to pay it back. neil: what about joe's point get a collection agency? >> they don't take your license away for 270 days.

neil: kids don't have money, what's a lien going to do then? >> don't take the money if you're not going to pay it back. >> you don't know that! >> you have nine months to figure out to make a deal and they won't suspend your license. neil: how is it different when we get tough on people who don't pay backtaxes. >> tell them they're going to go to jail if they don't pay it back. >> so debtor's prison that's next. if you can't repay a loan because you fall to hard times, there is bankruptcy court. >> if you don't pay child support, you go to jail. neil: you are never going to get this problem under control no enforcement mechanism. >> there are means to get them to pay, it garnishing of wages, liens. neil: you show up and break their arm? >> or that there is that. [ laughter ] . >> the government can enforce them to pay. people who can't pay shouldn't be further penalized by having

their license away. neil: i wouldn't have you come off as a touchy-feely liberal guy. >> i am one in love with the constitution of the united states of america. neil: he's atution guy, you are not. when we come back chris christie has a problem collecting taxes from legalized pot but not legalized gambling. gary johnson says it's high time for the governor to shut up. when the moment's spontaneous, why pause to take a pill? or stop to find a bathroom? cialis for daily use is approved to treat both erectile dysfunction and the urinary symptoms of bph, like needing to go frequently, day or night. tell your doctor about all your medical conditions and medicines, and ask if your heart is healthy enough for sex. do not take cialis if you take nitrates for chest pain as it may cause an unsafe drop in blood pressure. do not drink alcohol in excess. side effects may include headache, upset stomach, delayed backache or muscle ache. to avoid long-term injury, get medical help right away

for an erection lasting more than four hours. if you have any sudden decrease or loss in hearing or vision or any symptoms of an allergic reaction stop taking cialis and get medical help right away. ask your doctor about cialis for daily use and a free 30-tablet trial.

. neil: hey, all you pot smokers let's say chris christie is not your bud. the new jersey governor calling revenues from pot sales blood money a tad bit hypocritical, he doesn't have a problem with casino money. that's a very good point,

governor what do you make of what he's doing here? doing here? >> i'm outraged neil talking about the constitution in your previous segment. i've always viewed the constitution as protect be the minority against the will of the majority. look, you have the majority of americans now supporting the legalization of marijuana and yet bernard noble in louisiana, black man, father of seven, was sentenced to 13 years in jail for possession of two joints that was his third conviction on possession. no violent crime he's going to jail for 13 years, that's blood money, spent on the courts, prisons and law enforcements that could be saying --. neil: just to make pot legal, which would be attractive source of revenue for states

he's calling it blood money, he's saying it's quite opposite when you don't do this? right? >> i think it's quite the opposite. what gets overlooked when you talk about revenues from pot, is those revenues get dwarfed, dwarfed by the savings in law enforcement, the courts and the prisons when you realize that half of what we spend in all those categories is drug related. this is tyranny, i guess christie is out, vote for christie is a vote for tyranny. neil: i don't think that's on his bumper sticker yet, i will check. governor what do you make of the idea that it bumps up the drug chain here that if you allow pot that you're just escalating other drugs and that the push will be onto make them legal. that's what i think he's saying. go ahead. well, the world would be a better place if all drugs were legalized.

look, 90% of the drug problem is -- neil: all drugs? >> all drugs. if they were legalized. 90% of the drug problem is prohibition related not use related. i think this country is going to take giant steps forward when it comes to drug policy when they realize that the sky isn't going to fall tomorrow that the world is a better place when you legalize marijuana, and then start to look at harder drugs and realize that the problems have to do with prohibition. look, 8,000 people died last year from heroin and cocaine overdose. you could argue that that is all prohibition related. meaning quality quantity unknown. i just think that legalizing marijuana we're going to enlighten ourselves regarding the other substances. look, it's never going to be legal to do any drug whatsoever and do harm to someone else. that's always going to be illegal. but smoking pot? doing no harm to anyone

arguably other than yourself? look, that should not be criminal. that should be a choice that you should be able to scombliek all right, i'm going to put you down as a maybe on chris christie. governor, always good seeing you. [ laughter ] >> thank you very much. >> all right thanks, neil. neil: thank you. remember when the president celebrated a certain soldier's release with his parents at the rose garden? more than a few of you are asking what's the deal with that guy making deals? the real question that needs to be asked is "what is it that we can do that is impactful?" what the cloud enables is computing to empower cancer researchers. it used to take two weeks to sequence and analyze a genome; with the microsoft cloud we can analyze 100 per day. whatever i can do to help compute a cure for cancer, that's what i'd like to do. bring us your baffling.

bring us your audacious. we want your sticky notes, sketchbooks, and scribbles. let's pin 'em to the wall. kick 'em around. kick 'em around, see what happens. because we're in the how-do-i-get-this-startup- off-the-ground business. the taking-your-business- global-business. we're in the problem-solving business. 400,000 people - ready to help you solve problems while they're still called opportunities. from figuring it out to getting it done we're here to help.

congratulations. you're down with crestor. yes! when diet and exercise aren't enough, adding crestor lowers bad cholesterol up to 55%. crestor is not for people with liver disease or women who are nursing, pregnant, or may become pregnant. tell your doctor all medicines you take. call your doctor if you have muscle pain or weakness, feel unusually tired have loss of appetite, upper belly pain, dark urine or yellowing of skin or eyes. these could be signs of serious side effects. i'm down with crestor! make your move. ask your doctor about crestor.

>> "what's the deal, neil?" neil: what is the deal with these iran and nuclear talks? the same gang that traded one army deserter 45 taliban commanders is now negotiating a nuclear deal with iran? the one that hold for success in yemen forget what is the deal,

many people are saying what the heck. anthony says i feel like obama and john kerry are giving aid and comfort to the enemy. he says whatever will happen to him life in prison, a firing squad it should be what is done for desertion. and i'm surprised that president obama was not able to give him a pass. he intimidated general betray and lying about the video. and then the captain went to the restroom on the plane in germany and michele e-mails us that this latest plane crash is another cry. you could put dozens of these cameras on airplanes carrying

very little weight. he would do it anyway. and the last thing that i would worry about is the guy piloting it and now the former pilot says i hope that people don't get the idea that all pilots act this way. they do not. but i think we need to check. and it explains all of this and confirms why i don't fly and i take the bus, which is fine if you're not going to europe. and peter says are we exhausting this psychological path? why wasn't anyone picking up on those signs. and then the ongoing rush of republican candidates. it is mathematically unlikely that we will have a nominee by the time of the convention in cleveland next year. the professor says you forget that there were a lot of republican candidates in 2012 and by the time of the

convention mitt romney had more than enough delegates to secure the nomination. and you are quite right. but there are even more this year and unlike them, no presumed single front runner. an aide says i like how you took on karl rove. this is the same guy that refuse to believe that romney lost ohio. i put more faith in your numbers than his. and another says what the pundits do the talking. all right. their track record has been so remarkable. and finally calvin in philadelphia says i always liked the way you use history to prove your point. say that more often because i think people need to be reminded that the prevailing view at the time was right. we can never would have become president and neither would jfk or carter. and that is why i'm always here

to challenge what everyone else is saying. it's the reason why never hadtance." dates in high school but the reason why my hunk in information today >> a letter arrives in the mail with news of a strange and lucrative inheritance. >> if i got a letter like this, i would think it was a scam. someone is scamming us. >> so is it a scam? >> i said, you know, ray, there is a fine line between aenius and . announcer: is it a scam?ssed >> there's a fine line between da genius andy. idiot. >> who is this mysterious l benefactor?i >> he did not have the familydn't life. he did not have a friend to talkll toy you. he really truly was a man with" an and inheritance