not because of greedy landlords or gentrification mostly because of politicians. that is our show. see you next week. monday, good night from new york.. neil: welcome, everybody. i'm neil cavuto. and it is a story of the week that continues to leave all other stories in its wake. a plane crash a suicide pilot a frantic captain. 144 terrified passengers and 5 crew members can you hear screaming on tape knowing the end is near. maybe because we all fly, maybe because of 9/11. maybe because of so many scary sky incidents since. what happens up there grips us all down here. why terrorists are targeting planes and why authorities keep beefing up security measures for those planes. when something like this happen, everybody stops if for no other reason than to consider the random nature of

fate. everybody pauses and everybody begins reassessing and examining not only fellow passengers on that plane but now the guys piloting it. that's why this story still grips because oos about a lot more than a crash in the alps. to aviation expert seth kaplan analyst charlie ohka. you say the airline industry is still okay but know that there are these caveats and incidents that happen, but we shouldn't obsess too much why? >> i think the airline industry has really -- it's magical to most consumers. being able to get up in an airplane, fly somewhere and in a couple of hours you are in a totally different country or totally different part of the usa i think is still amazing to people. that's part of the fascination we have with something like an airline crash. flying on airlines is far safer than hopping in the car and

driving around the corner. neil: you are definitely right about that. particularly with a pilot we reassess things, the big reason why airline stocks are pounded this week this idea that wait a minute, we've got a repiratize our worries here? >> exactly. oil prices have something to do with this also. if we put ourselves back in that post-9/11 mind-set you know people asking why is the door so hard to penetrate? well, back then the presumption was the bad guys are outside the cockpit, right? it's about making the cockpit as secure as possible. and neil hard to optimize for everything. if you're going to do that you're making it yeah harder also for the good guy when he happens to be outside the cockpit in the rare incidences. having said that, neil if we think back to the egypt air pilot murder-suicide, that was in 1999 before 9/11. it wasn't as if the doors were

easy to penetrate. hard to get it all right. neil: you know obviously, this turns out this is what happened. i think, charlie to your point, the man trumps all. there's a great demand for travel particularly in asia and europe. a great demand to fly anywhere everywhere. i'm wondering if we start reassessing the costs here and start saying we need to beef up security in the planes. might mean higher ticket prices. what do you think happens? >> i don't think it's going necessarily mean higher ticket prices. here in the united states, we have very specific rules in terms of cockpits. everybody, there's always at least two people who have access to a cockpit. if a captain has to leave or first officer leaves, flight attendant can go into the cockpit of pit and take their place. neil: we're going to get into, this what good does it do if a flight attendant gets in, there he or she is not going to be able to fly the plane?

>> in this case they could have gotten the door open. neil: unless the crazy person doesn't kill the person. >> absolutely. there are lots of scenarios to make up. i think that the system we have in the united states right now is quite good, and we haven't had a problem, and it's something which i think that we should focus on and say look, everything's been going fairly well for us in the usa, and i think that the european airlines are moving to a u.s. system now. neil: watch that closely. seth, what do you think this means? i mean obviously, maybe given 9/11 we obsess about planes and know the bad guys obsess about planes whether they are terrorists or crazy pilots. we know that remains an obsession, why do you think that is? >> yeah, and to charlie's point. it's remarkable how quickly we learn. all of a sudden, we are a day after we learned what happened and already most of the european airlines are doing things more likely in the u.s. as for just the broader

obsession with airlines a lot of things you said, and i sometimes ask myself this myself, most people we use our cell phones all day long. shop for groceries few times a week. most people fly maybe once or twice a year and think more about airlines than cell phone company or the supermarket, and yeah, part of it is that -- neil: the cell phone or the supermarket won't kill you, right? >> you are right. it's beyond that flee. is part of emotional attachment. and some of the best and worst moments of people's lives can involve airlines. you go on honeymoon, you get on airplane, you went unfortunately to the funeral and the airline was canceled or delayed or what have you. the extreme circumstances, as charlie said before amazing what the industry does accomplish. yeah, those bad extremes are so much more visible as you said than what happens with your cell phone or at a supermarket. neil: thank you, both to charlie's point, airlines

overseas aren't the only ones not following pilot protocol. trying to get everybody on board with this, but they're not required to have two people in the cockpit. we don't necessarily always follow that to the letter safety expert says we need to crack down on that. even though this does exist in the united states, two people have to be in the cockpit, the captain or the copilot goes out to the rest room. are we not always honoring this? >> i've been on flights where it hasn't been honored. a flight attendant will stand they put a beverage cart in front of the bathroom and the flight attendant will stand between the beverage cart and the cockpit door so at that point in time, there is only one person in the cockpit. i think there is much more that the aviation industry can do. first off, video. why is there not video in the cockpits. neil: how would the video have helped in this case? >> i don't know if it helped in this case. you have a psychopath a criminal act.

it does serve as deterrent. i get videoed you get videoed walking down the street. the airline pilots association is against video, but i see no reason why the cockpits shouldn't require and have video because it would give us more clues than just the cockpit voice recorder. the cockpit voice recorder was great 30 yoeshgs technology has changed. neil: you mentioned the protocols, i got into a heap of trouble with pilots and flight attendants e-mails after i mentioned what you did i've seen the case where the pilot will step out or the copilot and a flight attendant doesn't go into the cockpit of pit but he or she is right outside the door guarded by the nefarious snack cart. my issue is i've seen it myself. they said no no no there was obviously a third pilot you didn't see. and i'm telling you, i've seen it. >> i've seen it as well. neil: now i'm wondering, they are very protective. they honor that to the letter. i'm sure many do.

i've flown many times and seen many who have not. do you think we're going to button down that and honor it? >> absolutely. just because it's regulation doesn't mean though the airlines shouldn't follow it day in and day out. in the aviation cases i'm involved in, i cannot tell you how many times pilots violate the sterile cockpit rule, their failure to adhere to that rule. neil: what is nonpertinent communication. the game last night? >> certain points of the flight, the pilots must only talk about flight operations. i've been involved in cases where they talk about baby-sitting, what they did the night before, and all of that led to distraction which caused them to make a mistake. just because it's a regulation though the airline should be following it repeatedly over and over, unfortunately i've seen it you've seen, it they don't do it. neil: i know we're going to get e-mails as we speak over that. thank you very much.

>> you're welcome. neil: back to the copilot. what if he had a medical issue, just fainted? we hear a medical history, a doctor's note certificate. what could that mean? to dr. rosy you can't rule anything out. what gets in the way of that doctor, indication that he, in this case the copilot deliberately locked the door that he had the wherewithal to do that. so much we don't know. you're saying we have to explore anything and everything. >> yes of course, there is very specific issues around the copilots's health and talking about the global issues what to do when someone is not well. i don't think we can make any diagnosis when we know very little. suppositions. he had been ill in 2009. he was 21 years old. neil: at time. >> at the time. he's 27 now. he's around 21 years old at the time, when he reportedly had a

major depressive disorder which resulted in him taking more than several months off his flight school. >> that should have been information. >> he took time off from flight school. must have known why he took time off. neil: i'm far from an expert. i assume that psychological tests were updated on a regular basis, every year two years. >> no they are not. neil: in most cases they are not. >> very important to obtain that. neil: what would you look for? let's say we do these every year. >> psychological testing is done in this particular airline's case that the psychological testing is done when they're hired but not repeated throughout the training. neil: what would you do a year or two years later? >> there is this issue about privacy and confidential -- neil: you're asking about relationships or financial loss. >> you have to ask about early

morning awakening and sleeping and eating disorder. neil: they could lie about that. >> there are things that could give you indication. neil: can you see through a liar? can you see someone trying to hide something? >> it's subjective, you can tell who's lying or not. the bottom line is he took several months off flight school, all right? someone apparently loved flying. someone doesn't do that unless there's a major issue, that should have been honed on and record psychological assessments. neil: someone brought in to people's attention, and he was aggressively questioned about that when he returned. >> we don't know what aggressive means. we don't know that. neil: what we know is that he was cleared to fly afterwards. >> the point is major depressive disorder is not a minor depressive illness it recurs, can recur and lot of cases it does. neil: in the first leg of the journey from barcelona, he did it in the second leg?

>> that's too small a time. it would have been a gradual ongoing issue. neil: could someone preplan that? >> no. in major depressive disorder he could have had dilutions or the medications could have made him more suicidal. i know there was no note indicating suicide he didn't have religious or political issues making him do this from all accounts. neil: really quickly someone who seems suicidal why take everyone out with him. >> delusions, resume nations that are clear in depression. neil: scary stuff. doctor thank you very much. do you ever wonder if steve jobs could only see apple now? rocketing to a trillion dollar behemoth, would jobs believe it? the book that leaves me thinking he might have predicted it. what the tech? another side of the thomas edison of our times that might

just change every jobs notion you had. now? can i at least put my shoes on? if your bladder is calling the shots ... you may have a medical condition called overactive bladder ... ...or oab you've got to be kidding me. i've had enough! it's time to talk to the doctor. ask your doctor how myrbetriq may help treat... ...oab symptoms of urgency frequency, and leakage. which may mean fewer trips to the bathroom. myrbetriq (mirabegron) may increase your blood pressure. myrbetriq may increase your chances... ...of not being able to empty your

bladder. tell your doctor right away if you have... ...trouble emptying your bladder or have a weak urine stream. myrbetriq may affect... ...or be affected by other medications... ...so tell your doctor about all the medicines you take. before taking myrbetriq, tell your doctor if you have liver or kidney problems. common side effects include increased blood pressure, common cold symptoms, urinary tract infection, and headache. take charge by talking to your doctor about your oab symptoms and myrbetriq. find out if you can get your first prescription at no cost by visiting myrbetriq.com

. neil: well, two weeks from today, you can place your order, at the biggest apple marketing gamble since the death of steve jobs will be on. let's say the clock will be ticking. how many iwatches does apple sell? what if it's not 10 million in the first year? are expectations so extreme that 8 million will be deemed extreme disappointment? that's the thing about being a category killer you get killed if you don't kill it all the time. and it all started with steve jobs who set in motion a company that choreographed success and single handedly made drama out of a simple product announcement. tim cook, this apple watch is

his baby. his steve jobs moment. his becoming steve jobs moment full. the book that finally unlocks the riddle in the conundrum we've always called steve jobs putting in perspective the evolution of irrasible even moody genius into a cooler, calmer peaceful visionary with, me the author of this stunning book, brent chandler. on what they learned on the greatest technology minds. i came across i'm going clean up my language i said something else during the break. he comes across whether it's your book or isaacson's book. he had a lot of jerk qualities. he's kind of obnoxious, didn't mind it he was a genius what do you think? >> if you were outside his close circle of friends or the close group of colleagues he worked with at apple, he really didn't care what you thought of

him. deeply, deeply didn't care. you know, you might be -- you've been very nice us to and said hello, and we've never met before. steve wouldn't necessarily be like that. he didn't really -- manners were not as porn to him as they might be to you and me. neil: i get that i get when he wanted to make the apple headquarters, the whole idea was to get everyone so they could talk, yet he didn't believe in it himself. >> it wasn't that he wasn't a social animal. he was an extremely social animal and highly skilled. he had highly attune eq, emotional quotient. he could perceive especially weakness, but he could perceive a lot of things almost instantly. he had very sharp social skills. he just didn't choose to use them for social implications. neil: the niceties that we all sort of do. >> he wouldn't build a better

product. >> they used to talk about sugar coating and sugar coating is just vanity. it's only because you want somebody to like you. that's why do you it. and they were like, it's better to deliver the bad news straight up. neil: johnny ives with his designers? >> pretty clear about what works and doesn't work. neil: the perfectionist and all, that you address more the wilderness years between the first firing at apple and returning as the savior, and that included the next period the pixar period, i'm not saying he got nicer, but he seemed to be more at peace and resolve to what he wanted to be? >> he learned a lot both from the failure which turned into a small success but more importantly from the failures at pixar that led to a giant

success. it taught him about a business that relied upon all sorts of creative people contributing to make something that he didn't even understand how it went together. neil: how did you get him to talk to you as often as you did? >> we were both curious about similar things, and so i think like he liked a lot of the questions i asked. he seemed to like some of the things i wrote. neil: was it tough to juggle the personal relationship that you developed versus being the journalist at heart? >> not at all. when you see somebody with great frequency, when i say great frequency, i mean every month or six weeks for a long -- for decades. i'd see him at home at the office. not always for a story, and so we have this other just friendly relationship where we were just -- we like to talk to each other, and so that changes.

neil: you saw another side of him. >> yeah, it's an interview, but it's always a conversation. neil: now i've interviewed him many times over the years with the various products, and he was a great salesman but never wanted critical questions. he would turn you on fast, he was possessive that way. you also got to tim cook. cook was not a fan of that book, sxiem wondering why? because that was the sanctioned condoned biography. >> well we were surprised during our interview with cook about how forthright he was about that and you know he told us in the interview, he did not like the depiction in that book i think that you know, everybody has a right to their opinion about all of us. neil: what did cook say about the depiction of he and jobs in this book?

>> cook, i don't think, has come out and said anything. neil: he had the liver story. >> he told us the story about his liver. amazing interview. apple didn't talk to us for two years during our reporting. when we signed this book up, they wanted nothing to do with it. they cooperated with one book they were done. neil: they felt burned on that book. >> and they were done. two years later we're told okay, we're going to work with you. three weeks after that, we have our interviews. neil: you both have very good reputations, but the one thing i want to talk about, referring to the genius that was jobs, there are two different competing views on this where you talk about steve wozniak, and the idea was that woz was an engineering genius steve's a great enabler of genius. that was very revealing. what did you mean by that? >> the way to think about steve

jobs rather than a technological genius, he was an impresario. a lot of people equated him with pt barnum. he could marshall resources and drum up enthusiasm and articulate a goal for a team of people and to put a show on that demonstrates why what the people did is exciting and you want it. neil: you get to a lot of exciting stories. bill gates where they both were together in 91. a lot of behind the scenes stuff a geek or not a geek. it is a must read, great job on that. and i think i came away that he was a brilliant jerk, but still had jerkish qualities. that doesn't mean you can't be a genius means you can be an irrasible one. you know what apple's got coming, have you heard ♪everybody

needs a helpin hand♪ ♪take a look at your fellow man♪ ♪and tell me what..♪ ♪what can i do..♪ ♪what can i do today?♪

. neil: i've always held the belief, if you have something good to sell, people will buy. what could the president of the united states learn from essentially a fast food guy? how about this? if it don't look good or sound good, it ain't going to taste good. all right? that is why he pours so much into the look and feel of mouth watering burgers, the fact he uses incredibly hot models eating them reinforces the fact that people of america want to try them, too. i raise this point and comparison to raise a simple point and comparison andy knows he's got something good. i don't think it's dawned on the president yet that he does not bear with me no matter how much the commander in chief pushes free college and free internet, it doesn't seem to move the needle maybe because

americans know they're going to have to foot the bill, and that is not very appetizing to them. now many will say, you cannot compare a burger to a bureaucracy. no. they're all wrong. because in the end, customers invariably want to see the beef. it is all about presentation and making folks think it is worth while and if you're throwing in hot models, that can hardly hurt. see how i forcibly made that comparison? >> really good. neil: basic cable, that's what i do. i was thinking about the new product and i think you have one coming up. i think presidents of all whether corporations or the country they've got to market what they're selling and sell something people will want and i think the problem with the president's latest offering is outside of those who might benefit from free community college or whatever most

people don't want it and don't want to pay for it. >> everything the president says sounds so good and means so little. and we don't need more freebies, we need more opportunity. and the way to generate opportunity increase opportunity reduce poverty. you do that with economic growth. the way you generate economic growth. one system has done, that it's the only system that has the word free in it that's the free enterprise system. it will generate growth. when we get growth, i think the president wants to take credit for things he didn't have responsibility for. neil: under his watch. it's always what presidents of both parties do. he's going to complain things are bad, he's going to get credit when things are good. the ones that talk to me like the gardener and they tell me looked at markets we're off our feet. what do you say? >> we've got consumer spending was way up in the fourth quarter. we've only had 2.2% gdp growth

a lot of that was driven by consumer spending you didn't have businesses investing or inventory. oil prices were down. oil prices were down because of american fracking. that's absolutely the only reason it is down. neil: it's happening under my watch but he's marketing more of this when you say he's misreading it and marketing stuff people aren't liking. >> yep, but you need in a business or running government you need to understand what's working and why it's working. if you don't understand why it's working, you don't know what to promote. you don't know what people are interested in. you don't know what people really want. i think by trying to fit everything into the ideological framework, he misses the point. if we have a burger that sells well, why is itwell? what part of the country is it selling in? neil: you know your audience well, with the newburghers, in the case of using a beautiful model it's going to bring in the young males or the big

demographic. but it's more than that, right? >> you need to know who you're appealing to. we work to the demographic, mcdonald's wendy's, market to the family. a larger group. we need to be more specific to be competitive. president is working on the larger group. he needs to know what and why they want it. neil: i wouldn't be targeting the doubters bill clinton is very good at that. >> bill clinton was not only good bill clinton got results. he not only convinced --. neil: talk about a guy who loved fast food. >> but convinced people about the right things. we have a president who is not trying to advocate for free enterprise and growth and business, the kinds of businesses and opportunities he's marketing for freebies and what the government can do for you as opposed to what you can do for yourself. if the government takes power, it takes it from someplace, it's the american people it's from freedom and liberty. neil: if it was an appealing sell, they'll buy it.

>> brilliant marketing, andy. great burgers. neil: obviously not eating it. great thing. what's to stop us from getting burned all o

♪. neil: and here comes the solar boondoggle. the energy department bringing back the fuel efficiency loan program that funded solyndra that went bankrupt after getting more than 500 million dollars in taxpayer cash. are we repeating our singed sins? kayleigh mcenany says get ready for more bad bets. the government should be investing in these types of projects. what's the problem? >> i like to look at the government's track record. we see a greenhouse graveyard to the tune of 22 companies that have gone bankrupt giving

government loans putting 3 billion dollars of the track record at risk. tesla is a great example of a loan that went well. >> and repaid it early. >> repaid it early. uncompensated risk, that put the taxpayers at risk. neil: if it turned out well, you get pay dirt? >> you get paid bactloan you don't get a portion of the company. >> risk comes with it, and i felt that the department of energy spokesmen said they have 3% losses after the 22 failures that you're talking about. neil: maybe they're beating the wrong drum? >> what drum should be beat? neil: if solar were so strong it would sell itself. >> i don't know, i think these things take time. with people money is tight right now. you have to campaign for anything. but we're talking about 259 of 16 billion dollar budget.

>> you are looking at the micropicture. challenge you and look at macropicture, since 1973 we put 153 billion dollars into renewable energy. what have we gotten? .2%. >> no we were still -- shale gas is saving us at the pump. neil: it is ironic situation that the president is no fan of fossil fuel what saved his bacon and recovery was the fracking and energy price in general gave him her on credit and he hates it. >> especially on keystone which i think we should move forward on and that would be a nice bargaining chip we can go with. neil: a bargaining chip to get more solar. we might have settled this. >> so we can be done. not with the panel. >> keystone needs to move forward. >> i don't think there are a lot of people who would disagree with that. neil: very pragmatic and very, very smart as well. investors get over it rates

are going up. next, why you should be very happy that they are, and it's friday, so these young ladies notwithstanding, the bitter boomers are back, but who says only old angry men need apply? today we've got an angry woman. she's even more bitter.

. neil: all right, a fox biz alert for you. new york fed officials are working behind closed with wall street honchos and preparing them for the inevitable. rates are going to rise. dave's answer get over it. dave, your view is it's inevitable. the timing might not be clear but it's going to happen move on. is that the gist of it? >> it is move on neil this the is situation where you can't be certain what's going to happen. here in colorado we have to do driving in the mountains and driving over a mountain pass in the winter it's like getting out of that deficit we were in or the problem since 2008

driving, driving, keep foot on the gas. when you crest that hill if you're going too fast, you can hit black ice on the other side and you've got no control. and i think what the fed's been doing is worrying so much about how are we going to handle the black ice? we don't know if we have control over the top of the summit and crested the summit and it's kind of too late. do it already. let's get on with it. neil: it is interesting that the fed is very, very cognizant of the markets doesn't want to rattle them, hence the so-called behind closed-door meetings which is weird why don't you leave the doors open that's another matter. but obviously, preparing them for something i would think they're a smart bunch, they know it's coming. what do you think the fed is saying in the meetings? >> well, i think what they're saying is there's some concern that will the mechanisms work and will this tap the breaks on the economy the right way? neil: what do you think? if they were in there with you, what would you say? >> i would say to them it's the

exact same analogy. i would say look, what you just did for the last seven years is unprecedented. so thinking that you're going to be able to maintain exact control once you get to the top of the summit, and you have to tap the brakes you can't, it's an illusion that kind of control is illusion thank you for telling us let's get on with it and let's get on with responding to it if we find we go into a skid. we can't be sure that you can't. it's black ice on the other side. neil: that is a brilliant analogy. i'm going to take that as my own. very good job. i understand it. that's what makes him so good. dave, thank you. in the meantime, it is the "cavuto" original critics are calling the hit segment of the decade and possibly ever. they can't get enough of our friday segment bitter boomers. here's what some are saying --

how do we top it? by adding a boomer that's way over the top. a new bitter bo itter panel. can you get who the so,as my personal financial psychic, i'm sure you know what this meeting is about. yes, a raise. i'm letting you go. i knew that. you see, this is my amerivest managed... balances. no. portfolio. and if doesn't perform well for two consecutive gold. quarters. quarters...yup. then amerivest gives me back their advisory... stocks. fees. fees. fees for those quarters. yeah. so, i'm confident i'm in good hands. for all the confidence you need. td ameritrade. you got this.

♪. neil: they're old, they're bold, and all their backs ache don't think of calling them expendable. it's friday and the bitter boomers are loaded. what has talked about the most talked about tv segment in the country or in a lot of nursing homes in this country. charlie gasparino, steve levy, charlie brady and the bitterest

of them all, lizzie mcdonald. millennials listen up, studies show you are falling behind other countries when it comes to simple financial smarts. delayed applause better late than never. we're a little older here, not -- [ laughter ]. neil: while april is financial literacy month you don't have to wait. time for a boomer business boot camp right now. lizzie, first to you, why do you think the young and the restless are financially clueless? >> i think they're sitting on the couch and not getting work, that's the best way to be financially literate to work. i don't mean to sound so cranky as a cranky boomette. they are using credit cards as checking accounts that's not a good idea. neil: as if you never did. >> i didn't have any plastic whatsoever. >> they are largely illiterate. i mean they can write read they can certainly do e-mail.

but if you talk to a lo boomers about literature or something like that they have no idea. i was brought up war and peace and a guy goes who wrote this -- a millennial said who wrote war and peace i said tolstoy. he said tolstoy? never heard of him. [ laughter ] >> this is what gets me neil, this country doesn't need lawyers, doesn't need investment bankers, we have too many of those. and the whole crowd is going down and these people cannot find jobs on wall street. if they're going to be lawyers. neil: some of them are. >> very, very few. but but but, let me finish for a second. neil: sorry. >> he's on a roll. >> what we need this country infrastructure! we need plumbers we need electricians, we need people that can work with their hands. >> what does this have to do with our subject. >> it has a lot to do with it. millennials are not applying for the job. i sit on the board of a water

leak company. neil: who doesn't, right, sure. >> they repair leaks you know what the biggest problem is they can't find workers. they can't find plumbers. neil: maybe we're telling them to get smart in areas they shouldn't have to get smart? >> exactly right. >> i see a lot of impulse buying and facilitated by the constant presence of the internet and people spend money. neil: so do old people. >> and they get further in the hole. they get buried in debt at a very young age. it's hard to get out of the hole. neil: you have to admit you are cheap. >> they have not done manual labor. i worked in construction. >> that's exactly right, charlie. >> my old man could do plumbing, he was an electrician, he was a construction worker. >> do you think that's a fair wrap? >> i think that this -- listen they are hard workers millennials are hard workers

but expectations and aspirations are so odd they want to be youtube reality stars where we need more doctors and engineers, it's now more what you download. i love millennials but i think aspirations are a little off. >> it's not just engineers and doctors there's only room for so many of those. if we had a president who realized that the problem with this country is infrastructure that gets a d in terms of the civil engineer. neil: will you let go of the infrastructure thing? >> what's that? neil: no go ahead. >> old people talk about interest in the country. you have to wake up to this. neil: the argument is that they want -- they want it easy and the quick purchases and tolstoy he's talking about. >> you talk about soft skills and hard skills math and accounts, soft skills dressing appropriately for work it's

dress down friday. >> you don't see that here. >> i got ask them do you work in a newsroom or lumberyard. >> we should also point out to be fair, the millennials fought in all the middle eastern conflicts for our country they were great kids. i meet a lot of those kids and you'd want to hire them. neil: you can't make a sweeping indictment. >> no. that's why i corrected myself right now. we get a warped view of millennials in the new york area. neil: they don't know, they're financially illiterate. whose fault is that. >> the ones in the new york area are illiterate on everything. you know why? we baby them here. >> it's the parents' fault. neil: we don't teach them. >> i like how old people boomers focus on internal infrastructure. >> canes and stuff. [ laughter ] >> yes. >> it's not nature. >> no but it's not just new york either neil. it's that millennials that have

a higher unemployment rate less employment than other generations at their point in life. neil: is that because the jobs stink? it's our fault for leading them back to the world. >> it's the parents' fault. it's our fault. >> they've got to realize -- [ inaudible ] >> they have to realize the jobs are in electricity and plumbing. >> they are intrigued by free stuff, right? >> they hate it when i throw coffee at them. neil: i hate it that you're here. [ laughter ] >> thank you, these are bitter boomers, and the deal that has

>> what's the deal, neil? neil: and what's the deal with the guy who made that deal to get sergeant bergdahl back here being the same guy negotiating a secret one with iran on nuke weapons? sue on facebook writes: what is the deal, neil? this white house couldn't make a deal on "let's make a deal." ron: i'm sorry, i don't trust

the current administration to pick the correct paint for the white house. pam: we'll probably give them five nuclear reactors in turn for them promising not to use them. joyce: how can you make a deal with the leader who says he wants us all dead? jimmy: neil i'm scared to death of these negotiations, emphasis on death. ricky writes: i also believe in easter bunny and santa claus. wait a minute -- which is why p.j. says: now is not the time for me to even suggest we cut defense. half the world is on fire, and you want to cut depence? the first out of the federal government -- first out of the federal government is to keep us safe. read the republican budget before making stupid remarks. well, i read that republican budge, p.j. and try as i might when i'm looking at defense getting close to $600 billion, surely we can reprioritize some spending, spending still based on full war levels with iraq and

afghanistan. retired captain fn in the u.s. navy says the same: you're correct. somewhere in that $600 billion budget we could do a better job of prioritizing. we need congress and the dod to let go of some pet projects and bases that are not the highest priority and use those funds for readiness and procurement. then what is the deal with rick santorum gearing up for another white house run? now, i warned him with evangelicals like ted cruz and mike huckabee and ben carson planning to run, he's going to have a tougher time. >> you go back to four years ago there were a whole lot of other people who were considering. it's always competitive. it has been competitive in the past and this thing will win know itself down. -- winnow itself down. so many people are looking for someone with a fresh message to bring us together. neil: all right. is that the fresh message and is he the fresh messenger? would you want rick santorum in another run? ricky writes: yes sir in a heartbeat.

he's a good man with values and cowers about the people. cares about the people. bonnie: no, no, do not run. do not waste your money. you will not win. we have many nice guys running, you do not have that extra punch. janice: no, stay out. we immediate to focus on cruz, carson, walker and rubio. rosalynn: i really like you, but as much as i admire some of your values -- speaking about santorum -- i thought you were divisive last time around. denny i says thank you for your willingness to serve, but that said no. finally some fashion advice from one of our loyal viewers, lowell: neil, your tie is knotted too small. maybe go with a double windsor next time, eh? clearly what was happening was your mind was wandering. something we were doing was boring you, because for you to obsess about my tie knot says that you were distracted. and i don't want you distracted. so from now on i want you watching o'reilly's knot, switch back to me and compare them.

and remember, monday is ask neil anything day. tie knots are far game as well. looking forward to your questions. my you spend time with us. now, lou dobbs. lou: good evening everybody. i'm lou dobbs. shocking new evidence tonight that confirms the co-pilot of the germanwings flight 9525 andreas lubitz should never have been allowed near the controls of the airbus a-320 that he helped fly. investigators have sufficient evidence to say unequivocally that there were many signs that lubitz's mental state, he shouldn't have been in the cockpit. they found a doctor's excuse for illness note for the very day of the crash. and investigators aren't saying what the illness