wiped her server clean so no more lies being be proven american voters should wipe her clean from the ballot. thank you so much for joining us. good night from new york. neil: good evening, everybody. i'm neil cavuto. and i'm all for consumption tags. but in addition to an income tax. guard your wallet, it could be closer than you think. democrats and republicans like the simplicity of it and say it's a great step to finally reforming our tax law. they're not reforming it. both sides are piling on it. word is, we will still have an income tax. republicans say they'll make it simpler and lower, but they won't make it disappear. that is not a great start. the thing about starting any kind of consumption tax, you know that tax only goes higher. when denmark implemented a tax back in the late 1960s, it it was set at roughly 5%. as european countries

caught on, the rate steadily rose to 8%. then 10%. then 15%. and finally 20%. with a proviso under some conditions, it can be ratcheted up to 25%. another example of politicians far more creative at finding ways to get more money than save money. be careful what you wish for you tax reformers out there. sometimes the fix puts you in a bigger fix. to michael. dan mitchell. and julie.ou argue this consumption tax isn't a good idea, but for other reasons. >> it's horrible. it's a completely regressive tax. excuse me. that on top of a sales tax, you also have a consumption tax. forget the income tax. you're taxing people with sales tax. then a fat tax. >> it hits lower income people. >> it hits lower income people and it's not the way to go. >> even though france does this. >> despite my love for the french. i'll say hello to them.

>> talk to them. >> talk to them and tell them they're wrong about that. >> i wouldn't mind the idea of a vat. it's a pile-on. >> absolutely. your whole preamble with that with the income tax. the whole idea of simplifying the tax code and taking a plat a flat tax and sales tax, is that so you can avoid double taxation. this does the exact opposite. >> when italy was toying with that to follow the rest of europe at the time. we didn't have a european union at the time. the argument was that it would be low. it would eventually go away. and in the flip side would be that income tax rates would go a lot lower. none of that happened. none of it. >> it's just like with our income tax. when we got the income tax in 1914. the top was 7%. look where it's now. any time you give politicians a new source of revenue you're

opening up pandora's box. you know they'll spend it. push the rates higher. we need to build fences around the tax system not to open the gates wide so politicians can spend more money. >> see that's what concerns me. there's a point to that. i worry more about the fact, we'll provide a lot more revenue for washington to do whatever. >> well you're not wrong. essentially you have a state -- let's look at the state income tax. you have a state income tax. a federal income tax. in new york city, you have a -- >> you say lucky? >> you're screwed three different ways. here, you have a sales tax in new york state. a sales tax in new york city. and also a federal vat tax. i'm not for that. you would be shocked to hear, i have a limit. >> you're much more pragmatic than i thought. if you think about it right now both sides are closer to this

because it's a little bit easier to sell than higher tax rates or removing a lot of allowances and special things to various groups. >> i think it's harder. if you have a sales tax and you don't want to have an income tax you're talking about the 16th amendment. getting rid of that i'm not sure will be so easy. the goal we need to achieve is simplification along with better use of our resources. right now small businesses in particular are crushed with having to get lawyers and figure out the whole maze of tax rules and stuff. we need to be able to simplify the code so we can increase productivity. that's a way to get more economic growth. >> you know everybody has been saying this, and ted cruz mentioned this in his presidential announcement. his goal is to get your entire tax to fill out an index card. i remember ronald reagan saying that. will we ever get to that point, or is it wishful

thinking? >> it will be an uphill battle. a consumption-based tax is good in theory. it simply means you don't have double taxation. the flat tax is a consumption-based tax. the national sales tax is a consumption-based tax. as is the vat. where do we like a flat tax, but not the vat. the flat tax is talked about in the context of getting rid of the pages of the -- >> right. their charm or their draw is that you get rid of our present tax code. >> yeah. whereas the vat the politicians in washington they're salivating they're drooling over the possibility of the vat as an add-on tax. do it through a flat tax. the worst thing that happens, you degenerate back to the current system. the worst thing what happens with the vat becomes france. >> i don't think it's that bad. the food is good.

>> tell them to stop with the egg on everything. >> i love the egg on everything. >> you're so healthy and all. the argue for a consumption tax whatever they want to call it, is that we're one of the few conditions oncountriesthat doesn't have one. the last thing the us should be doing is taking tax cues from france actually for any of these countries who it has not been working like a charm for. it worries me that we're taking these cues from europe. what do you think? >> well these are excuses by politicians to just raise on more taxes. look, i don't care if you're democrat or liberal or republican it doesn't matter. they love taxes and they're searching for more taxes. in france and in europe you're looking at gdp. think about this. the government is eating up 50% of gdp every single year. we're about 40% relative to that. we don't want to go down

the road to socialism. we want to go down the road to freedom. we should be leaders not, i mean, imitators. low taxation. growth. they believe in entrepreneurs and freedom. not taxes. >> all right, mark, thank you very much. i apologize we had problems with your audio. thank you. in the meantime, very powerful. this chart pretty much says it all. american savings rate is descryskyrocketing as gas prices are tumbling. they're not spending. they're saving. billionaire businessman john says people hunkering down might be a good thing. why do you think? >> well, eight years ago, when the biggest problems that was known to all business magazines was us savings accounts were at an all-time low. people were hardly saving money. got into mortgage problems. couldn't pay their bills. people are saving money.

they're becoming more responsible appear a. a lot of reasons for it. when you throw out extra taxes people say wait a minute. extra taxes. i better start saving now. if not we'll have real problems. i want to be able to go through it okay. >> if everyone were to do it at the same time, then it would be damaging to the economy. right? at least near-term because nobody is spending. >> i think what's happening because of the weather and everything that's happened in the past few months, a little bit of fear out there. there will be a certain point where they put enough away they'll spend again. i think it's fabulous for america and the economy and everybody. now they feel secure, they can go out and spend money on luxury goods maybe they wouldn't normally buy. >> vodka comes to mind. >> oh yeah. patron. >> we talk about high-end, low-end. the high-end is doing just fine. continuing to spend. not so a lot of other folks.

does that worry you that this chasm can widen? >> once they reach a certain point of personal security, then they'll go out and spend and be able to treat themselves to something nice. >> how soon do you think they do that? >> in a matter of months. it won't be long. unless they continue talking about these extra taxes people will freak out and really holding back. >> what will it mean like businesses like yours. you're everywhere. personal products. i'm wondering if a consumption tax a simple consumption tax with a simple income tax code not a removed income tax code will actually help. what do you think? >> it would depend on what that flat tax simplified tax would be. >> what if it was 20%? >> if it was 20% across-the-board with no deductions. they wouldn't need other taxes. look what hong kong did with 10% taxes and became stable.

>> did hong kong switch other taxes for that tax? just added it on? >> it was a flat tax. like 10%. no deductions, no matter what your income was. if they did a 20% for everybody. there would be no more taxes. a lot more money they're making right now. >> the argument is that it would be regressive. guys like yourself would be nice, investment-related taxes. and the poorer would be stuck footing the bill. >> if you go with the flat tax especially 20%, it's on all money you make. all dividends. personal income. that would be so much money generated. if we made extra money -- >> you put 20% in all that investment-related stuff, people wouldn't invest. >> no. if it was over and above. >> that would be crucial. for a guy like you it's either/or. don't pile on. >> yeah. and people like me will take that money and reinvest it. the few companies i've

started the last couple of years. because i've been graced with nice income here. creates thousands of more jobs for other countries. a lot of this extra money people are using to create more jobs and good stuff for people. >> you know what's interesting about your background. like ken. home depot. michael dell. they started their businesses in the worst environments. if there's a will, there's a way. there's a genius to you guys. i wonder if this makes it tough for the next geniuses if this is the environment they have to succeed in. >> i don't think so. in '80 '81, $700 inflation. ten and a half interest rates. 17% was prime. you had to wait in line for gasoline. terrible conditions. but america i'm a firm

believer in can work. >> so the business model is sound. the approach is sound. it doesn't matter what the outside environment is. bernie marcus said, i can't do home depot. >> if i could start paul mitchell today, it was easier when things were worse several years back. inflation is different. a lot of things are different. today,, oh, my god, you have the internet. no $49 for an answering machine. you have the internet. i wouldn't have to give you the local printer $5 to give me a business card. things are better today. >> i feel better talking to you. and then i come home and realize, oh, my life is miserable. >> always a pleasure. >> we finally found something dorkier than google's smart glasses. sony's. guys. really? ♪

♪ neil: all right. forget what the tack. maybe we should call it get a clue. sony unveiling new smart glasses that are even dorkier than google glasses. tech expert jeff kimball on why sony would want to copy something that wasn't a success. what do air glasses do that the google ones don't? >> absolutely nothing. i'm normally the biggest proponent of the future, but these are an unmitigated disaster. they're hideously ugly. these are worst than google's. they look like a murderer on vacation wearing dark sunglasses. there isn't any interesting new hardware

to it. it's a misstep. it's a public misstep. neil: a lot of people say that they're -- they look more like regular glasses than google's. i didn't notice that. >> i don't think those people have eyes. do you think this whole technology, these smart glass, whatever you want to call them, have a future? >> absolutely. they have a future. there are a couple of japanese companies that are building things that are beautiful looking. >> they have to look completely regular. and it will happen. remember the ten years before the ipod was finally event. you had the rio and all these other technologies. we're in the nascence see before somebody nails it (?) >> plenty of time to play with the sony glasses as you're driving because believe it or not tesla is working on a software update that will let you do that kind of stuff

while you're driving. the car is driving. this software update will enable hands-free driving now. forget about this being safe, is it legal? >> it's three months out. they announced the next software update will offer some level of car self-deriving. it'sself-driving. it's like cruise control. you can't take a nap and go down main street. it's very specific. it's been heavily heavily tested. yes, regulations are working to catch up with technology. >> we have cars that can parallel park. and with cruise control that do a lot. it was just a matter of time. >> it's just a matter of time. and tesla is being intelligent. they're introducing it incrementally. they're not suddenly coming out with this crazy space car with things people don't understand. it's bit by bit the new components get added. it becomes regular.

and everybody can't imagine their life without them. >> be aware of technologies flying high. sometimes they stop flying at all. jetblue suffering an outage that grounded all traffic at jfk's international airport. things got so bad. they had to manually check in passengers. and get this, talk to them. [laughter] what do you think? >> yeah that -- i mean, new york city airports are awful. that really was the icing on the cake. neil: what was the problem? the software, glitch? >> it's software. this is old software. we've been checking people into airports with computers without much incidence. >> it spread. >> yes. i don't understand the whole software mechanics between how and spread. but jetblue did interesting things in that they used twitter to help people as much as they could. they were using technology to their own betterment. yes, the software problem --

>> did people tweet back to them? >> i imagine it wasn't always pretty. >> tech trends watcher. did apple's tim cook say that indiana is rotten to the core. what he blasted that could take a bigger bite out of apple than he knows right now. ♪

♪ neil: much ado about nothing. that is how indiana governor mike pence pretty much describes new religious freedom measure he just signed into law that is getting a lot of flak everywhere. some say religious freedom is code for antigay. among them apple ceo tim cook the openly gay executive, blasting him in an op-ed. writing, apple is open to everyone regardless of where they come from, what they look like what they worship, regardless what the law will allow in indiana and arkansas, we will

never tolerate discrimination. what exactly is cook threatening here and whom? indiana customers who might not even care about this issue but might have a bigger issue with a california ceo making their state the issue? regardless of what you think about this indiana law, whether it's a measure aimed to protect religious freedoms or actually code for being antigay, is it a slippery slope for a ceo of any company to lecture a state on such matters? remember cook's own state of california takes a dim view of jobs that are shipped overseas. yet not a word from cook about the millions of iphones apple makes in asia. and southern states like texas and arizona are cracking down on illegal immigration should he weigh in on those matters that a lot of liberal groups find particularly obsessive. be careful getting on a high horse. sometimes regardless of people's point of view, they don't take kindly to all of you calling

them horses asses. that's my spiel. to katrina pearson with hers. what do you make of it? >> this is classic liberal hypocrisy. you mentioned several things going on across the country that he's not talking about. for example, outsourcing jobs. you have these ceos that are finding their political voice at the expense of their company, not realizing that a lot of americans who may not be politically active are in fact, active in their consumerism and just might use that power moving forward. >> i'm just wondering whether you'll have a beef on gays, for example. >> right. neil: you leave yourself open to, all right, he spoke out on this but he didn't speak out about outsourcing or about illegal immigration and people start saying, oh, you pick and choose your battles. right? >> right. and he took this personally being gay himself. and that's understandable. but you don't

emotionally, you know, flashback at people, particularly in a state that has nothing really to do with you as an individual. you know, he didn't mention the fact that it was bill clinton that signed a religious freedom act way back when. >> that's right. >> here we are today in the situation where you have business owners being attacked by the left for antigay measures. >> but bill clinton later went on to say he regretted that. you're quite right. it started there. regardless of your point of view on this subject if gays or what have you -- that, that if you're in indiana or in one of these states and you don't like a ceo just pontificating or should we hold them to the same standard a lot of people say about actors and actresses you know, just act other than that, shut up? >> i mean, yes, we should. they are ceos. if they're speaking out against one thing there's likely somebody who works for them that is on the opposite side. how does that person

feel? they should be cognizant of the issues. somebody they employ falls into the bracket they don't support. at the bigger picture at the end of the day we're looking at a country who for the most part is socially traditional. now we're falling back into well i'm right. what you're doing is wrong. but his season own state shot down gay marriage. then he's criticizing another state from protecting business owners from being attacked. >> we'll watch closely. he might have set himself up for hits in other places. i'm an apple shareholder here. i should disclose. forget if we don't get a new deal with iran by tomorrow. charles payne says, worry far more for our stock market if we do. ♪

♪ neil: no payne no gain.

charles payne says, we let iran keep that nuclear stockpile they want to keep, well, it's not going to be good for stocks period. you're worried about this? charles: oh, absolutely. everyone has to be worried about this. we rapidly approach this deadline that president obama will be so desperate to craft any kind of deal. you know, for whatever reasons, you know, i think his legacy, maybe just sort sort of ornery in that kind of matter. or justify the nobel peace prize. give him another one. you'll be a great president. take the prize now. everyone must be worried. this is not just about the middle east. this is about the entire world. listen no one trusts iran. i mean, who does? they have the tentacles in four other countries. their intentions are known. their attitude towards israel has been well-advertised. this is a country i would do anything possible to make sure they never have a nuke. neil: what's scary is we're

scrambling to get a deal done. iran not so much. i don't know if they're playing good defense. the normal history of markets even when you get a greek debt deal or something, the first reaction is to buy. in other words people are relieved. okay greece avoid a fall, what have you. cooler heads prevail and think, no it's a lousy deal. when do we get to that reality if we get a deal? >> if we get a deal, that casts a giant shadow. neil: my own prediction would be the market moves up on it. i don't think it's justified. i think afterwards they would sell off. charles: i'm not sure. that one i'm really not sure. if it's the deal that netanyahu describes because we don't really know. it's been president obama in the un doing the negotiating. then i think that would be news for the markets. it would be sort of a little bit of an anchor in the market. >> in the meantime, you pick and choose your fights in this market.

you like ibm? charles: i like ibm here. you know what i like, there's a man named ronald reid. the guy 92 years old never made more than minimum wage. every stock he owned was over 100 years old. eight of them were created in the 1800s. the moral of the story the company has been around for 100 years. they've been through ups and downs. we thought ibm would go out of business two or three decades ago. they're making big improvements. going crazy into artificial intelligence. i think they'll survive. and wall street will jump on the bandwagon 40 points from here, $200 a share, wall street will tell everybody, hey ibm is looking pretty good. >> then they leap onto it. the argument against it is that ibm had its time. they rebounded once when microsoft was eating their lunch. they can't do it again. >> that's the argument. i kind of believe these companies, when they have pedigree plus a lot of money --

neil: they do. people forget that. charles: they can buy their ways into prominence. they need to shift gears. get rid of all the junk that's not working. buy yourself in artificial intelligence. >> get this and more on his fine show at 6:00 p.m. on this network. gives you insight nobody does. he's under a obligation to make you money. we just show up. charles: so far so good. >> that's right. mayweather, pacquiao, the fight everyone can't wait to happen. what the crock, don't think tractors can be worth big bucks? tune in to "strange inheritance" to find out how much one family made at just that. ♪

>> you know here how big this upcoming may

mayweather and manny pacquiao event will be, what they make on that event will be more than what many athletes will make in a lifetime. consider the purses we're talking about. mayweather 100 million for one night. that is just for right now. to the guy behind it all, the man who made those figures possible and stands to make not only boxing but sports history. talk about pressure. he's the same guy who worked for the us attorney's office for the southern district of new york in the tax division. so he's very familiar with the tax revenues that will come out of all this. bob, good to have you. thanks for coming. >> neil, a pleasure to be on. neil: two things i want to get an update on. pacquiao and these issues that he has spasms or something like that. it could get in the way of the fight. what are you hearing? >> well if manny was having cramping problems with his leg, we called

in the people from joe, the big orthopedic outfit in los angeles, they prescribed a cream which is allowed to be used. and i'm happy to reports that the cramps have gone away. neil: all right. so the fight is still on. the numbers that i referred to at the outset bob are they about right? could it be more than that? >> i mean, it is crazy. neil no fight in history has had a gate above 21 million. neil: amazing. >> that everybody thought was the biggest gate you could have. now we're in the 16,000 seat arena, the gate is scaled for $73 million. and people are begging for tickets. >> i know. i mean all of vegas is sold out. all surrounding hotels. i'm wondering though, you're a great promoter.

but do you ever fear that the hype is getting ahead of the event? >> try to hold back the hype. usually -- no, that's the truth. neil: right. >> usually when i promote an event, i go to guys like you neil, can you have me on television because i have to promote the event. not this. i hold back the hype and only go on programs serious programs like yours. neil: now i'm wondering where you see it all going though because the state of boxing is such outside of these guys is certainly zero interested in the heavyweight division. it wasn't like the days of holly and form. and shaver. these guys aren't spring chickens. what comes up after them? >> neil people have to pay attention to what we're doing. (?) last two years we've been putting on events in the country of china

which only has a billion 400 million people. we get audiences on these telecasts in china of 30 to 40 million homes. neil: but is that making up for what's happening in the united states? china is the future. i mean, they're getting into something that -- that has come and gone here. would you agree with that? >> well, i don't think so. i think china will be one of the principle areas for the sport of boxing. thanks to the have a very venetian it's going all over china. we're getting the best fighters from eastern europe. in the united states the interest is beginning to pick up again. certainly among mexican-americans, where

boxing is one of the major sports. (?) now, neil, you have to realize the demographics of this country are changing. so while there has been clearly a falloff in interest of boxing among the caucasian population, that has not been the case with the hispanics and not been the case of the -- with the african-american and the asian-americans. that group collectively soon to be a majority of the people in the united states. neil: true enough. i'm wondering the pay-per-view which is getting everyone's attention here, that could dwarf all prior numbers. i guess combined the way things are going. what do you see happening? >> i think we'll hit a number that certainly over 3 million homes and maybe close to 4 million homes. because i'm judging it based on -- for example the -- the international rights have never gone

for more than four or $5 million. and they've now passed $35 million for deals made. sponsorship is usually a million -- a million and a half. and it's over $11 million today. neil: incredible. >> so everything -- i mean the interest is tremendous among boxing fans certainly. but among people who have never even seen a boxing match. >> when this is all done, what do you do to top it? >> i don't know whether i can do anything further to top it. i'm 83 years old. and my time as a boxing promoter will be limited. i hope not -- not sooner, but later it will be. but i think 15, 20 years from now, there will be an event that will top this. i didn't believe back in '71, when ali fought

frazier that anything could be bigger than that fight. and look what we have here on may 2nd. >> that was a 5 million-dollar unprecedented thing. >> 5 million-dollar. and we thought jerry and jack were crazy for putting up so much money for a fight. neil: well it's incredible. it's a testament to you. hopefully it lives up to the hype. you're not hyping it. but probably i am. bob, look forward to seeing the fight. >> thank you very much neil. >> after the crash, crunching the numbers. germanwings and lufthansa are doing that trying to assign a fair value to someone's life. to the guy who changed how we competent victims regardless of how they die. and changes how ken feinberg looks at himself.

♪ >> a week ago tonight they were packing for a trip. what those germanwings passengers didn't realize, of course is that that trip would be their last. a little more than 12 hours away of crashing into a mountain at the hands of a co-pilot that was intent on ending his life. ken feinberg says there's no way to prepare for the unthinkable. he has found an eerie pattern to what is discovered afterward. very few are prepared financially in case something does. ken discovers few victims have a will. fewer still have liners. life insurance. ken has changed his own finances. he writes brilliantly on it in an op-ed on what he's done different differently. ken, thank you for taking the time. >> glad to be here. neil: i thought it was a very, very equizitly written column on the part of a guy who has seen

more than he cares to. and how unprepared most of us are not planning on happening immediately. >> that's right. after 9/11, over half the victims did not have a will. over half the victims had no life insurance whatsoever. the overwhelming number of survivors, even though we offered them free financial planning didn't want it. neil: is that right? >> over -- i think only about 78 of over three -- almost 3,000 people who died on 9/11, only 78 families when i offered them the compensation, were willing to receive free financial planning assistance. neil: you know what i thought reading your column, if not for that compensation fund, they'd have been in deep doodoo. >> that's right. and also i discovered -- and you know this, neil, most

families when they're intact before a tragedy, they don't discuss how the estate or the assets ought to be distributed if a father or a mother die. neil: right. >> they don't want to talk about it. and we found in case after case after case, total shock on the part of survivors as to what the victim in the airplanes or the world center the pentagon what she or he wanted to do -- >> we're even learning that with robin williams heirs fighting over his estate. you changed a couple of things. you got yourself more insurance. you sought out a financial planner. just tell me about the things that changed on your part. >> first, i ran to a lawyer and updated my will. i said to myself before 9/11 there will always be time. i'm a young man. there's no urgency. after 9/11 i

immediately updated my personal will concerning my assets. i also immediately bought additional life insurance. both short-term insurance and whole life to protect against the uncertainties of the future. >> but that will be harder for guys our age? >> very very difficult. and i sat my family down and discussed with them what i wanted done if -- because of untimely death. neil: now did any of them get annoyed or say hey, i thought i had this coming to me or any of that? >> no but you know the reaction human nature, some of my young children we don't want to talk about it. neil: oh, yeah. >> let's not talk about this. neil: what scares me, ken my kids want to talk about it. let's say hypothetically things happen, dad what's in it for me? but you're saying they have to communicate. >> they have to. otherwise you saw this. we had siblings fighting with one another. neil: oh, i remember.

>> biological parents fighting with fiancés and same-sex partners. it was ugly. not all the time but there were a few that got pretty ugly yes. neil: well you make people think and think about things they don't want to think about. touche to you and this column. we'll have a lot more after this. let's pin 'em to the wall. kick 'em around. kick 'em around, see what happens. bring us your need-it-done-yesterdays. your impracticals, your how-do-we-do-thats, impossibles, your what-do-we-do-nows, downright inaccessibles. bring us those things you're not sure how to pull off - and you're even less sure who to ask. because we're in the pushing- what's-possible business. the how-do-i-get-this-startup- off-the-ground business. the taking-your-business- global-business.

we're in the problem-solving business. more than 400,000 people around the world ready to help you solve problems while they're still called opportunities. from figuring it out to getting it done we're here to help. the real question that needs to be asked is "what is it that we can do that is impactful?" what the cloud enables is computing to empower cancer researchers. it used to take two weeks to sequence and analyze a genome; with the microsoft cloud we can analyze 100 per day. whatever i can do to help compute a cure for cancer, that's what i'd like to do.

>> not just what is the deal, it is monday. you know what that means -- >> that will do, good night. first up kim you seem to think you are funny. you are not. kim, you seem to think i care. i hate to break it to you, but i

don't. todd neil, does kentucky go all the way? sure todd. why not. if wisconsin michigan state and duke do not. and cavuto, you i am not saving for retirement what i do -- do i do? assume you won't need as much in transportation or clothing if you are not working full time. you said you like scary movies, i do too. which is your favorite. the exorcist. and alvin. i heard you say you played football as a kid. what position. left bench. i had the cleanest uniform on the team. you keep insisting that hillary clinton will not be the democratic nominee all her poll numbers look formidable to me.

just like 2008, we know what happened then. that is what gives me pause. history. tina neil, do you have liberal friends? tina, i am married to one. calvin neil, mayweather versus manny pacquiao -- >> if the fight ever comes off i am getting worried, i am hearing about manny pacquiao having spasm issues, if it does. mayweather. >> and maria in florida years ago while visiting new york, i saw you at a yankees' game with your kids, you seemed so kind decent to all who met and wanted your autograph you were

the mirror opposite of what i pictured which is the real you? the guy with the hot dog why are you surprised. love and be loving, kent, out in vermont, mr. cavuto, i learned a great deal about shopping for my wife from your annual holiday tips now she is pregnant with our first child any tips, always call her beautiful never call her fat and forever worship the ground he is walks on, she might not think you are an idiot. and what is difference between you and a real anchor, a real anchor would not let your e-mail slip in. neil do you like the pope? >> yes i do. >> karen neil, if you had to do it all over again would you sell your soul to the devil at fox. >> i would but i would make sure viewers like you did not get fox. and this german plane crash

tragedy has me rethinking flying, wire planning a trip to europe. >> enjoy your trip, incidents like these are rare. fortunately cowering in fear of the outside world we would never get out of the house life itself is a chance, if you think about it but knowing your chances of something bad happening when flying are low remember life is something else, short, i say go long. >> i read in "variety" you have multiple sclerosis and survive stage 4 hodgkin's disease how do you square getting hit with these two horrible ailments in the same life in. >> i don't. >> regular viewers of this show brady knew. some like you slip through. who knew.

all right, thank you. stuff like do i like the pope? i appreciate your just wanting to know these general questions i expect better of you next week. "strange inheritance" starts now now. >> a farmer with a unusual hobby, a huge collection. >> anybody that collects 150 tractors buzz that make youic centric? >> he spent a lifetime and a pretty penny amassing it. jamie: a treasure trove of valuable americana or a heard of white elephants. >> dad you are running out of room. where are you going to put them all?