Skip to main content

tv   Lou Dobbs Tonight  FOX Business  April 12, 2015 7:00pm-8:01pm EDT

7:00 pm
i'm watching earnings. big week. probably see earnings down because of the strong dollar. thanks so much for joining us. i'm maria bartiromo. hello everybody i am lou dobbs. both the united states and iran deepening their involvement in yemen's civil war. a move that raises concerns about the prospects of a broader regional war. the united states says it's speeding up delivery of weapons mainly ammunition and precision guided bombs to the coalition that's battling houthi fighters backed by iran. and iran deploying its war ships to the gulf of aden. that raising the risk of a direction copfrontation with saudi arabia. we take up this worsening conflict that yemen is seeking to exploit.
7:01 pm
new warnings that obama's nuclear agreement with iran brings the middle east closer to a nuclear war including henry kissinger and charles schultz. media magnet joins us to talk about the president's foreign policy failures. here tonight, senator rand paul making it official he's running for president. paul declaring himself the republican who can defeat the washington machine. we take up the senator's chances of winning. we begin in yemen. new warnings from secretary of defense saying the houthi rebels are gaining territory. >> the terrorism threat to the
7:02 pm
west, including the united states from aqap is a long standing and serious one. we will change the way we do that in accordance with the circumstances there. obviously, we hope that order is restored to yemen not only for that reason, but because there's a lot of suffering going on in yemen as these battles and different groups go back and forth. >> joining us tonight former u.s. ambassador to saudi arabia. he's the diplomat in residence at southern methodist university. ambassador, good to have you back with us. the defense secretary, is saying that al qaeda is exploiting the situation in yemen. it seems like overburdening the obvious, what do you make of it? >> it should come as no surprise that al qaeda in the arabian peninsula is alive and well despite what president obama has said about degrading their capabilities. the saudis did a good job
7:03 pm
eliminating al qaeda from saudi arabia. in the middle of the last decade. but where did they go? they went to yemen. they were clearly a threat. it surprised me that they seem surprised that they're actually taking advantage of the chaos there. >> and the saudis taking this leadership role. and i want to take up the moves by iran in just a moment. but it is, to me -- it seems a very positive indicator that saudi arabia is taking up leadership along with egypt in the region. yet this white house even though speeding up arms and weapons to the saudis they have not made much of the fact that there is a new force of leadership in the region that should, it seems to me be welcome to most americans. >> it should be welcome. it's about time the saudis and they're other colleagues on the arabian peninsula took charge of their own neighborhood. they have relied on our security for quite a long time.
7:04 pm
it's appropriate for them to take this leadership. but we've got to be supportive of them. we made the $60 billion arms deal with the saudis quite some time ago. it is time we started delivering on those commitments. >> and delivering on commitments, iran, at this moment, sending its ships to aden. it intends obviously, to put forward a strong footprint in the gulf. your reaction how dangerous is it? >> i'm not terribly upset yet. this is one destroyer and one logistics ship. they don't have the capacity to do anything right now. they could perhaps make mischief in the strait there through which a number of oil deliveries go. but right now, i think they're out there probably just showing that they're interested. reminding people they're there. but they will not at least at this level, present a significant military force. >> let me turn to george schultz and henry kissinger.
7:05 pm
i have to say, it's quite something that these two distinguished statesmen still have the capacity to galvanize the nation's attention. today writing in a wall street journal op-ed, mixing shrewd diplomacy with open defiance on resolutions iran has grad wale returned the negotiation on its head. the centrifuges are down to 20,000. the threat of war now constraints the west more than iran. >> we have to be hopeful. this framework agreement can cut that back in a realistic sense. that op-ed goes on to say, that if we can get tight enough inspection regime a tight enough resolution of the snap back sanctions and further cooperation from our european
7:06 pm
allies we may still have the makings of a deal. but all of that is extremely speculative right now. we don't know. i think that secretary kissinger and schultz have got it right. >> dick cheney shocking no one with his blunt talk. saying that he believes that president obama is trying to take the country down. what do you make of the vice president's statement? >> i'm always reluctant to attribute motives like that. i think that's an extreme statement. i do think that this president has made a mess of foreign policy, particularly in the middle east. but i don't think there's anyone who can claim an academy award for foreign policy in the united states over the last 15 years. >> well, nobel peace prizes seem to be on hand at almost a moment's notice for some. great to have you with us. >> thank you. dick cheney says this president is the worst ever.
7:07 pm
billionaire media mogul zukerman on the iran deal. israel and the indecipherable obama doctrine. hollywood's richest actress with a block buster admission. what she told vanity fair. next.
7:08 pm
7:09 pm
7:10 pm
7:11 pm
turning now to the debate over the iranian nuclear agreement, so-called. president obama is at odds with senior lawmakers of his own party. senator schumer the latest to back legislation that would require congress to approve any deal. that led marie harf to issue a warning today. >> congress has played a cue role in getting us to this point. we want to talk and consult with them about this. their priority should not be making the u.s. negotiator's jobs harder not making it harder for us at the negotiating table by doing things that are harmful to that process and not taking away presidential prerogative. >> well there is some instruction for everyone from ms. harf. there are now a dozen democrats who have co-signed a bill
7:12 pm
backing a congressional roll in the process. they're indicating they could support such legislation. our next guest tonight says through a catalog of broken promises and bad faith, iran has retained its entire secret nuclear infrastructure. what is more disturbing to him is the obama administration acts as if iran were a constructive partner for peace rather than the main target of its aggression mainly israel. joining us is mort zuckerman. good to have you with us. this ongoing discussion about the framework for an agreement in which we are told now by both parties, that there is no agreement. that there is no framework. and that at the same time, urging support for it, no matter how nebults its shape. >> the whole thing is almost a farce.
7:13 pm
okay. because generally speaking when you have this kind of a diplomatic agreement. they have a shared understanding of what the language says about it t. it. how they let this happen to me, this is unbelievable to me. they had one agreement in english and farcy. nobody read the farsi agreement. so you really don't have an agreement after all of this. worse than that, even if the american agreement had taken precedence, it was a terrible deal in my judgment. >> a terrible deal that we are reminded quite often by the same people who urge our support of it that it isn't a deal, that it isn't an agreement. i have never seen the like of this. in all of my career certainly. and it seems as if in every instance of foreign policy there is a remedial project underway under this
7:14 pm
administration. they can't seem to get anything correct, proper or straight. >> well, they certainly, shall we say, have not inspired either the country or the world with their insight into foreign policy. it is now become almost -- i don't want to say it's a joke. there are too many serious matters that can result from this thing. that is not going to be a joke. they do not seem to understand how to use american power and presence. when they get in a negotiation, they get out negotiated. >> senator corker he wanted to be helpful here and at the same time preserve some sort of adult supervision. will there be a role for congress, for the senate in approving any deal do you think ultimately? >> a majority of the senate is definitely going to vote in favor of that role for the congress. now they have to get a certain number. whether they get to that final number is too early to tell. but there is no a growing sense
7:15 pm
in the congress and indeed, in the country that there has to be some adult supervision of what this administration is prepared to do on its foreign policy. i suspect in the end they will get that. >> there is an interesting quiet from our presumptive allies in the middle east or in europe about the deal. we have heard from the french of all people, great reticence and concern and urging caution here. others are basically just sitting on their hands. it is unlike any time i can recall where there is not a loud, clear signal from the united states and its allies about the direction -- the future would take. >> you got a very clear signal from the prime minister of israel that this is exactly the wrong way to go. i was in the congress when he gave that speech. it was an extraordinary speech and he basically pointed out
7:16 pm
what we're now beginning to live with, or try to live with or explain in some way to change. they understood what the risks were if this kind of a program that was put forth by the obama administration became the agreement. because nobody was protected here except the iranians. >> except the iranians, as you go through this administration's legacy, and all of the discussion about what will be his legacy, this is a head scratching moment certainly. because it's unclear what in the world we're trying to achieve. >> if you look back, upon the obama foreign policy in this region, it goes back years, he seems to have had the feeling he could somehow or another bring iran out of the opposition camp and into some kind of better relationship with the united states. it's a perfectly normal or honorable objective. when you are deal ing with a country like iran and you're getting nowhere except you're taking everything from you that you really want to get out of a
7:17 pm
program like this, out of a negotiation like this, at some point you've got to find a way to make them fear you. they don't fear the united states, as i wrote. we have a foreign policy where our enemies don't fear us but our friends do. >> and respect is in short supply when it comes to the united states. i remember vividly the president saying he would restore respect in regard to the united states after the bush administration. as you note, i mean, we are the laughing stock. let's be clear we're the laughing stock of the world right now. our policies are ineffective. the arkchitecture of our plans are nothing more than vapor. >> i must say i don't know quite how to describe it. it really is astonishing i have -- i think many of us who watch this closely have not seen this level -- i hate to use the word ineptitude but just simply
7:18 pm
people who do not seem to understand how to make policy work so that the united states' interests are protected and not diminished. situation after situation after situation that's been the result. >> the vice president dick cheney cheney, said clearly he thinks the president actually has a nefarious impulse. that he is following. he wants to take america down. how do you react to that dark view of the president and the country's future? >> no, i don't share that view. i don't think he's deliberately trying to take the country down. what worries me is something just as serious. because he is the president of the united states somehow or another he doesn't understand how to take the country up. i don't know that he deliberately wants to take it down. he doesn't have the right people with him. he doesn't know how to get the right strategy or the right execution. now, he has believed -- one of the foreign officers of the
7:19 pm
united states wrote a whole pamphlet on this, that he could some how woo iran into a deal. at one point when you're involved at something here h nuclear weapons could literally be -- pervade the whole pooesmiddle east. you could create an absolute dangerous place to the extent we have not seen ever with a lot of countries having nuclear weapons going after each other. let's hope we can prevent that. >> mort great to have you here. as you talked about whether his intent is to take the country down, whatever it is, he's attempting to do here, the problem is, the direction is pretty clear right now. irrespective of motivation. that is down at this point. >> i don't think he's badly motivated. i think he's inadequately experienced and he doesn't have the people with him that are able to give him the path that he could follow. it's very scary now. >> mort thank you very much.
7:20 pm
as always. mort zuckerman. last might we told you about romney's acumen. after finishing ahead of all 11.5 entrants, the winner of the espn bracket challenge is being denied his rightful hard won prize. 12-year-old sam holtz missed only six. he predicted all, including duke. sam is only 12 years old. and espn rules stipulate he must be at least 18 to claim his rightful prize. the $20,000 prize that he won rightfully. along with a trip to the maui invitational next year. espn has decided to send sam what they are calling a gift bag full of goodies, instead.
7:21 pm
espn you do so many things so well. you show such class. you're being called upon to replicate your past behavior. do so. modern family star sefia vergara -- i don't understand how i could stumble over that name. making a stunning revelation. she told vanity fair magazine that her assets are indeed real although she says she's gotten too much of a good thing in her judgment. her career is in conflict with her view. she is the highest paid television actress in all the land. making a reported $37 million last year for her very modern family role. and a multitude of endorsements. up next, president obama panned as a one term senator with no experience back in 2008. so why do republicans who have
7:22 pm
declared for 2016 sport very similar resumes? my commentary comin ♪ help northern china reduce its reliance on coal fire heating plants and prevent 60 million tons of co2 emissions? when emerson takes up the challenge it's never been done before simply becomes consider it solved. emerson.
7:23 pm
7:24 pm
7:25 pm
7:26 pm
a few comments now on the field of gop presidential candidates that has with thetry of senator rand paul grown to two. paul plauzus senator cruz both almost instantly attacked with thir limited experience. it was back in 2007 when first term senator obama announced he was running for president. critics on both sides of theale aisle jumping on his lack of experience. how about this moment from a democratic debate? >> you were asked if he were ready, right now i don't believe it s. it is not something that stands on-the-job training. that isn't a still picture
7:27 pm
there. biden holding that stare for a good three seconds. and biden didn't understand up standing by his statement. that is how he got his current job. all these years later, critics still bring up mr. obama's consistent lack of experience. >> anyone who is so fundamentally misunderstands american greatness is uniquely unqualified to lead this great nation. >> whoa. now we've got two declared republican presidential candidates, rand paul and ted cruz. both first term senators, yes, both lacking woefully lacking in foreign policy experience. and next monday, marco rubio of florida expected to officially announce he's running. that's right the first three candidates in the gop race are first term senators. at this rate we're going to have a critical shortage of senators working in the senate. before obama you have to go back
7:28 pm
to senator jack kennedy to find a first term senator who was elected president. presidential politics is a -- conservative governors who have done something, and may do better in 2016. some of those republican governors are mucking up their chances. just two weeks ago, indiana's governor mike pence, signed a controversial religious freedom law that some say simply ruined his chanced. lit politico said his dreams crumbled. the new jersey governor chris christie who isn't conservativeinate for some. a recent washington post headline says quote, is it already all over for chris christie? who is it to be in 2016? at this point in 2007, it looked like clinton would be the one. and it looked like romney for a
7:29 pm
while there in 2012. now it looks like clinton again. but we know how that worked out, at least once before. so i'm thinking the republican party needs to think about someone younger, with fresh ideas and traditional values with high regard for our constitution. and the working men and women and their families who make up our middle class. someone bright enough, strong enough of character to bring big money interest groups like the chamber of commerce and the business round table to heal while boosting small business and. who can put our middle class to the head of the line and pull the snouts of special interest groups away. someone who realizes the republican party can be the party of the american dream. and celebrate capitalism without embarrassment and becoming a slave to capital or organizesed
7:30 pm
labor. someone who will follow general's advice. let's remember when we talk about the morons that we elect to office of late. we're the morons who voted for them. we're going to have to do a lot better this time. now our quotation of the evening, this one from president abraham lincoln, he said elections belong to the people. it's their decision. if they decide to turn their back on the fire and burn their behinds, then they will have to sit on their blisters. i like that. i hope you do. we're coming right back. coming up rand paul is in what is his path to the gop nomination? we'll discuss the presidential sweepstakes, next. you pay your auto insurance premium every month on the dot. you're like the poster child for paying on time. and then one day
7:31 pm
you tap the bumper of a station wagon. no big deal... until your insurance company jacks up your rates. you freak out. what good is having insurance if you get punished for using it? hey insurance companies, news flash. nobody's perfect. for drivers with accident forgiveness, liberty mutual won't raise your rates due to your first accident. see car insurance in a whole new light. liberty mutual insurance.
7:32 pm
7:33 pm
7:34 pm
foul language, bloody sheets, the norm in the clinton white house according to the new book, the residence. inside the private world of the white house. former white house reporter kate anderson writes of an incident between president clinton and the first lady that resulted in blood all over the first couple's bed. staffers claim hillary hit
7:35 pm
clinton upside the face after learning about the lewinsky affair. another staffer recalls hillary throwing a lamp. she also cites that bill clinton slept on a couch. joining us an editor of the national review, syndicated commonnist. rich lowery. good to have you both here. this is quite a revelation. how much credence do you give it? >> i give it a lot of credence. it's not a great revelation. we have heard these things before. it makes hillary clinton look good, frankly. bill deserved it. we all know that. it's a reminder of all that. i think it actually probably helps helps her. if this were happening today they would have their own reality show. >> they do have their own
7:36 pm
reality show. we have to live in it. i agree. it probably helps her because it creates sympathy. no one -- everyone is going to think she was pushed to the limits of endurance and she was in her rights to throw anything she wanted at him. i think where she was blameworthy she was complicit in efforts to smear the women who came forward. >> you know, people talk about the clintons, their fatigue particularly with hillary. is there not a fatigue with all of these stories, sort of the trailer park drama that seems to engulf this couple? >> you know, we all know this, because we have been following this for long time. that was long time ago. we're going back, you know 20 years. >> trust me. >> all these new voters, they kind -- the clintons have dug a good job of scrubbing the internet.
7:37 pm
>> do you think there's a new generation of people wanting to know more? >> they don't know about jennifer flowers, they kind of know there was monica lewinsky thing. they don't know what we know and perhaps it's useful. >> the president showing his thin skin telling scott walker to bone up on his foreign policy. and really get himself prepared to criticize the president before he does so. why would he even just -- wouldn't he find normally that beneath him to do that? >> there are many things that should beneath him that he says and does. this will help scott walker. he might as well write a check to his campaign. this is great attention. i'm sure he can send out fund raising e-mails on it. the fact of the matter, scott walker is nor knowledgeable and correct at least about this deal than the president is himself. >> did you see the statement
7:38 pm
that walker put out? i thought it was brilliant. he reminded us, this is coming from a president who referred to isis as the jv squad. he listed mistakes the president has made that weren't just embarrassing, but deadly in some ways. he was able to make lemonade what the president hoped would be lemons. >> rand paul saying this, histry enter into the race will assure us that we can take back the white house from democrats in 2016. he was wise and clever in his construction there, don't you think? >> very gracious thing to say. the question with rand, he'll have 15% to 20% of his dad's supporters. the question is can he build out from that. there is a crowded field. he'll have a lot of competition.
7:39 pm
he won't be the only one criticizing the bush years on spending, not the only one talking about the constitution and limited government. i think he has a hard road ahead of him. what's most distinctive about him, foreign policy looks like a liability than it did a year ago. >> it's interesting to me as i watch republicans react to what is a growing field two first term senators here. we have a third on his way. the reality is that the republicans right now seem to be resisting the growth in choices when they should be embracing it. it seems an inherent narrowness, a preference for a narrow field. they're going to have the opposite aren't they? >> this is a knee jerk reaction that the democrats seem to have won, hillary clinton. hillary doesn't act like she's got the run. she has to. because of this whole machine that's been built around her. with regard to rand paul look, he has to show people that he's
7:40 pm
not his dad. his dad was looked at a little bit crazy. i thought today he came off very well. i think that people will be open to him. he was talking about these -- economic freedom zones. it's like the jack kemp enterprise. this is what he's basing it on. he's coming in pretty mainstream. i think it's going to be tough. it certainly isn't impossible. >> i think most people welcome the competition the people who don't are the donors. >> they want this settled and done. >> why this enthusiasm? is it because that they have such a comfort level with him at the business round table -- >> he talks their language, they're scared to some extent on the populist part of the republican party. and they see this as a return to kind of pretea party era. >> when i hear populatalism, i
7:41 pm
like to ask people, what is the anthetical of populist? who are you for, if not for the people, right? >> the back room cigar -- >> elite -- >> i think -- by george, i think we've made a point here. thanks for being here. we appreciate it. thank you. al. coming up next, california. running out of water, two top scientists tonight debate the punishing drought and the political choices that almost no one wants to recognize. we'll show you one woman who loves her car and isn't about to let go. with a little help from a the future of the market is never clear. but at t. rowe price we can help guide your retirement savings. our experience is one reason 100% of our retirement funds beat their 10-year lipper averages. so wherever your long-term goals take you we can help you feel confident. request a prospectus or summary prospectus with investment information, risks, fees and expenses to read and consider carefully before investing.
7:42 pm
call us or your advisor. t. rowe price. invest with confidence.
7:43 pm
7:44 pm
7:45 pm
california governor jerry brown defending his state's first ever water restrictions. water rationing, calling for a mandatory 25% reduction in water usage throughout the state. more than 90% of the state is experiencing severe drought conditions. the drought has entered its fourth year. governor brown warning californians if they don't comply, they could be fined. >> it's requiring action and changes in behavior from the oregon border all the way to the mexican border.
7:46 pm
it affects lawns how long people stay in the shower. how businesses use water. people can be fined $500 a day. >> for more on how the governor's water rationing could affect the state's water supply we have the director of the research institute. and a senior writer scientist at the nasa jet propulsion lab and a professor at uc irvine. let me start, if i may, with you, roger, this drought, 90%, every survey i seen, california is taking it seriously, this is the first time it's rationing. you folks have got, according to, well, to jay's most recent article, about a year's supply of water left. what's taking so long? >> well, people are really taking this drought seriously. and it is a serious drought.
7:47 pm
perhaps the most severe drought of the past 100 years. it's taken away for the public consciousness to get here because we do have a lot of water in california. it's how we use and allocate it to different uses. our storage reservoirs which i think the la times piece you referred to normally only have a couple years of storage in there but we usually have more water out our ground water. then can -- >> we're showing folks at home those reservoirs are critically low. and jay, your thoughts? this looks to me like a part where everybody wants to take is seriously, but yet the state's population is still growing. everybody is going ahead with their business as usual excepting a rubusiness which is
7:48 pm
having to cut back in lots of places. landscapeing landscaping. al this is only now beginning to impinge on the quality of life in your state, right? >> that's right. roger is right. we do have a fair amount of ground water. the problem is we have no water no snow in the mountains, our reservoirs are low like you said. we have to rely more and more -- we're up to 75% 80% reliance on ground water. tha is a strategic reserve that we need to maintain for the long term not just for this particular drought. we do have a very high water quality of life in the state and in this country. it's a very difficult thing to ask people to back away from that. i hope the governor's restrictions are sending a strong message that this is extremely serious. >> you have been calling for the governor to ration -- i want to compliment you on one of the great lines i read in recent memory. you conclude your op-ed in the
7:49 pm
la times saying, call me old fashioned. but i'd like to live in a state that has a paddle so that it might also still have a creek. i love the sentiment. and i would like to think that california is going to act to -- react. within the context of the -- >> i hope so. >> within the context of the southwest, we're talking about some scientists say a 500 year drought that we're on -- the early stages of that. much of water in california comes from other states in the southwest are also dependent on the same water resources. >> that's right. and so you know, a lot of times in california we hear our doolittle problems we face across the american west. so we have some issues you mentioned population growth and
7:50 pm
agriculture. as we move forward through the 21st serchcentury we have to begin through long term planning to address population growth and climate change and what we want to do with our agricultural economy here in the southwest. it's unlikely we can continue to do it all. >> california isn't -- the bread basket to that region, it's a bread basket for the entire country. what happens there is going to have an impact to the nation, right? >> exactly. my university is right in the middle of the central valley, which produces about 25% of the nation's food. and in doing that we use, what, about 20% or 30% of the nation's grountd water to do that. we can use that as long as it's replenished in wet years. california has had -- this is
7:51 pm
the tenth drought in the last 100 years. maybe drought is the norm and there's a few wet years in between the replenish the ground water we use in the dry years. >> as we wrap up here, i want to ask you, is it your sense that rationing could go even stronger than 25%? how far do you think this could go? jay, let me ask you really quickly what would you do? >> i think we've probably maxed out on the domestic and municipal side. i think agriculture are inevitable. >> you got the last word. >> we can do more on both sides. about one third of the urban water use is outdoor water use. there is still some efficiency to be gained on the inside water use. yeah, there's some gains that can be made in ag too. we need a brought solution. >> it's clear you both think
7:52 pm
that those more stringent rationing levels are on the way in unfortunately. thank you very much we appreciate you both being here. come back soon. >> my pleasure. a georgia man with a conceal carry license is being hailed as a hero tonight after he prevented an attempted car jacking and probably saved a woman's life in so doing. the incident caught on surveillance camera. when a teenager tried to steal the woman's car she jumped on to the hood trying to stop him from driving away with her car. witnesses say that prompted the alleged thief to then speed up. foch fortunately a by stander saw the scene unfolding he pulled his gun and shot the thief in his shoulder. thankfully the woman was not hurt and she got her car back. to beat all that. up next, crime, corruption, predators and how a unit staffed
7:53 pm
by a man's best friend hears it all. it's a book written by jim bourn. he's her next. the pursuit of healthier. it begins from the second we're born. after all, healthier doesn't happen all by itself. it needs to be earned... every day... using wellness to keep away illness... and believing that a single life can be made better by millions of others. healthier takes somebody who can power modern health care... by connecting every single part of it. for as the world keeps on searching for healthier... we're here to make healthier happen. optum. healthier is here.
7:54 pm
7:55 pm
7:56 pm
kidnap and corruption a k-9 unit the subject of a latest thriller by my next guest who joins us. former drug and law enforcement agent jim bourn.
7:57 pm
his new book is entitled scent of murder. he's a florida state law enforcement officer. he's a buddy of mine and co-author. congratulations on the book. >> thanks, it was a long time coming. we have video. i want to show folks. you've got this base on the k-9 unit. the bond between a dog and law enforcement officers. there we are. can you see that? i don't know if you can see that. >> yes. >> playing out -- what kind of dog is it? >> that's is a belgian dog from the jupiter police department. his name is jimmy. that was a rough day. >> jimmy is a plain name for a fancy breed look that. >> he's a great dog. >> what did you think when that thing hit you? >> i had a good time. it was interesting. i liked doing research on books. i wish i would have done it at had the beginning of the book
7:58 pm
rather than towards the end. it gave me an understanding of what a dog can do just for that. just for take downs. the real value, they're the superheroes of police work in their ability to sniff out bombs cadavers, drugs. money that has drug scent on them. >> and part of the protagonist, if you will, in the book -- why did you decide on this? the realism that you bring to any book is extraordinary. >> i want people to get a different view of the standard, you know police novel. where everyone is bigger than life. cops are real people. they have lives outside of their jobs. in this case with k-9 handlers, they live with the dogs. they come home at night and are integrated with their family. most people don't realize that. i wanted to give people that sense of attachment they have to dogs as well as their commitment to public safety.
7:59 pm
law enforcement image takes a beating sometimes. when you look at the overall work that police do it's remarkable how they go out there and what they do to protect the public. >> these with wonderful pictures. it's a wonderful book. and i just can't give away too much. i'll leave it this way. it's a page turner as one would expect from jim bourn. the title the scent of murder gives us a clue where the dogs are going to be. >> the cover image comes partially from my experience -- we had some inmates that escaped from a state prison and we had to chase them through the everglades. >> we know how that ends because jim bourn always gets his man. great to have you here. >> thank you for having me. >> good luck with the gk. congratulations. scent of murder. the book is available online and at bookstores everywhere.
8:00 pm
if you can't find it we can get it for you. thanks for letting us hear from you. that's it from us tonight. have a great evening. see you here tomorrow. good night from new york. tonight on "war stories." the one-way bombing mission that was america's answer to pearl harbor. >> we were going to die out there by fighting. >> taking on the fighting, with doolittle. >> those who made it and those who didn't and those who fell into the hands of a brutal enemy. >> they were tortured and beaten and interrogated. >> that is next on "war stories." good

56 Views

info Stream Only

Uploaded by TV Archive on