wouldn't touch it with a ten foot pole. >> that's it for forbes on fox. have a wonderful weekend, everybody. thank you for watching. keep it right here. the number one business block continues with eric and cashin in. protecting americans. marines murdered in cold blood by a mad man born in the middle east, raised in the us u.s., and now investigators are taking the close look at his it inrare. jordan and yemen possible countries he recently made trips to. are these the types of red flagsz our intel should be spending its resources on? hi everyone. i'm eric. welcome to cashin in. our crew this week reign rogers and michelle fields. also joining us our favorite liberal tarn and our favorite liberal jessica. welcome, everybody. michelle it's controversial, but is it time to profile? we don't have a problem with buddhist extremists.

we have a problem with muslim extremists. if they come here and threaten us, and they're coming from an wrar that's a hotbed for terrorism, of course we should scrutinize them and authorize yesly examine them. when it comes to immigration, why are we accepting immigrants from areas that we know are anti-american that have problems with isis, with muslim extremism? we have so many immigrants all over the world. people all over the world who want to come here and be the contributing members of society. >> i love when people react just out of fear and anger. gee, was he amuslim terrorist? muslim terrorist? oh no. this is like you know picking on people who are vulnerable because of their muslim faith and background.

>> the common deno, ma'am ator is muslim. >> you got in trouble for profiling basically someone on an airplane no? >> no. i said that i get nervous when i see people dressed in muslim garb sitting on an airplane. >> and you're not fear mongers? >> this is in the aftermath of 9/11. the thing is you want to absolutely profile people based on their faith or their country of origin. i think you go back to history and start looking at the country of origin the people who perpetrate massacres. it would not be people coming from -- >> john is it okay to at least use our resources. we have vast amounts of resources, intel. we have the fbi, the homeland security. we have the very terrorist joint task force. september that what we're supposed to be doing? looking at the countries that send us jihadists that want to kill -- especially kill american military? why can't we spend our resources on that? >> well, that's want point. government is supposed to protect you.

i'm an advocate for open immigration for this country, but not for inmys of this country. i mean to michelle's point, that's the enemy. it's militant islam. it's head quartered in the middle east. at a time of war, the notion is to protect american citizens and, of course we can't even say -- the president can't even say muslim, say islamist.

>> zoom to rattle islamists. >> we found out we should be looking at people. what are your thoughts on looking at people that come from radicalized nation that is in the past have sent us terrorists jihadists that killed americans and military personnel? >> you are not going to stop this. this is a lone wolf operation. it's silly. you know you have mad men everywhere. look at the guy in colorado. he has nothing to do with isis and nothing to do with -- you're going to have mad men doing these lone wolf things all the time. it has nothing to do with isis are. it has nothing to do with -- >> james, the director of the fbi, says he hadz open investigations in every single state in the union right now. what are we doing when a guy whose father was on a terror list was taken off the terror

list, and a guy who travels back and forth. if we're not even making him a red flag what -- we're lost, dude. we are something. we're in big trouble. terror on the home front. i'll tell you 100%. >> you think we're in big trouble. i don't. these are mad men, and you think it doesn't matter. >> it's not going to come from chooirn. these are -- >> they're motivate. have you no background. this guy doesn't have an arrest record. nothing like that. you can't tell this is going to happen. >> well michelle could we have at least put him on a watch list? >> absolutely. we know he was motivated by islam. he has a blog post where he talks about his faith. this is not something completely random. this is not is some crazy person. this is a person who was motivated by a faith, by a religion. >> oh, michelle. oh, michelle.

i'm motivate bid my christianity, and jarredan and kuwait are not radicalized countries. >> did you look at the blog post? >> your christian faith support spurring home grown militants. >> you're not going to condemn -- is every muslim like that? we're talking about radicalized, crazy? >> are you getting your talking points from care right now. we're not talking about every muslim. we are talking about those that pose a threat to america. >> you saw the masked creation from home grown terrorists. to michelle's point, it's because of their ideology their ideas. not even so much their -- >> very important. good profiling. i think rudy giuliani pointed

this out last week. i'll throw this to you. good profiling means you go after their radical ideology. not their race. not their religion. >> absolutely. i mean i think this is something we really need to do better on. we need the president to be talking more directly about this as the issue, naming the enemy in this case. i think democrats and republicans can agree about that. going after the ideology we need to get tougher. i've heard a lot of people talking about how we won the propaganda war during the cold war. we need to be using a lot of the same infrastructures that we did then so we can get our message out. >> i want to bring one more topic in. hang on guys. let's bring this up again. i think it's important. let's take a look at the picture of the front of one of the places that was shot up. take a look at the store right will there. right there on there it's a gun. it's a no gun zone. it's a military installation. i want to take you around the block and start with wayne. your thoughts on letting these military personnel who are very well trained and armed. let them arm themselves when they're on base and when they're on a recruiting center.

>> whether it's hamburger stands. let everybody have a gun. . >> more guns are better. >> that is a military -- >> that's a federal -- >> as a recruiting station, over at a naval station, but you know what this is another example where people who are supporting of donald trump, guns everywhere. he says that in an interview with ammo.com. this is a guy who used toment a ban on assault weapons. suddenly is he playing politics and you are falling for it. >> go ahead, john. >> i don't know who is talking about -- everybody is talking about donald trump is juan. arming the --

>> protect the homeland but kill the enemy and destroy the enemy over there, and then we truly will be free. >> if we can allow these people to go and defend this country and protect this country, then we should allow them to have a gun at a military -- >> let's not forget this guys. let's not forget this. our military is being targeted by the jihadist. if anyone should be armed, jessica, it should be them. >>ist been around the latest time. there was a good reason for it. there continues to be a good reason for it. i understand that the military is under attack. i have an interview that says the army is re-evaluating this policy. i'm sure we'll hear more about it. >> that is bir partisan.

that started with george h.w. bush and simon, a president bill clinton. maybe it is time to revisit that. guys we'll have to leave it right there. you guys, you two are moving mountains in social media. 550,000 tweets in the last 30 days. far more engagement than any other news show. wake up america is now the place to debate. the state of america where we are and where we are headed. let us know by the way. let us know what you think. should we profile more to keep america safe? now coming up the head of the afl-cio scott walker a national disgrace for taking on unions. is big labor's big p

>> since i've been governor, we took on the unions, and we won. if our reform kz work, they can work anywhere in america. >> well scott walker is in and unions are flipping out. richard trumpa head of the afl-cio calling the presidential hopeful a national disgrace. wisconsin governor reigned in union power in his state. now, swron than, call it an all-out brawl between big labor and scott walker. who needs -- who is the best for america? who wins this one? >> look what the unions have done to airlines steel, the textiles automakers. that's why unions are shrinking in almost every element of the economy except for government. there are 6% of the private

economy. almost 40% of the public sector and it's inherently corrupt. fdr warned against public sector unions decades and decades ago because, of course they're paid by taxes. that's guaranteed. they're able to vote and lobby for the politicians that actually keep them employed. you've never seen job security like in the public sector eric. you have a 99.96% chance of keeping your job. that's why public sector unions need to be reigned in asap. >> weigh in on this. >> i think jonathan is absolutely right. it's the public sector where the unions -- where the fdic and those kind of people are -- we've got five cities in the state of california for example, that have filed for bankruptcy primary primarily because the pensions are out of line. we have just seen what happened in greece with pennings. it's going to happen here, and if you keep increasing this the taxpayers can't support it. it's just -- jonathan is absolutely right. >> jessica, this man survived a recall vote. i think the people would be

better off with a scott walker. >> state lags over percentage points beyond the national. he is doing way worse than his neighbor minnesota, with a democratic governor who has raised taxes to deal with his budget deficit where scott walker has -- >> you he took his budget deficit. turned it into a profit. it turned into a plus.

>> is it time we push away from the unions? >> yeah. i think that's what americans want. the reason why trumpka is so upset is because he realized it's not just conservatives and republicans that don't like unions. it's all of america. i mean scott walker won. he beat the unions in a state. that's not a conservative state. i think they're scared. in terms of scott walker's record i mean jess is making it sound like he is awful. in 2011 they had over 11 had% employment. now it's at 4.6. i think he is doing a really good job, and i'm glad to see he is putting the state on a fiscally sustainable path. >> gee, i don't know. boy. he beat the unions. maybe he beat isis and al qaeda. we're not getting that -- maybe he said something stupid like that. you know what americans are very concerned about income inequality about the fact that wages aren't rising and guess

what. america's unions are the ones that created the american middle class. they stand for what americans are talking about at home. >> quick thought. >>.ub public sector it's quite recent. it's only after kennedy signed legislation in the 1960s that you really saw the public expand and why not? you get higher wages, higher benefits and retire in 50 or 60 with $100,000 pensions. we're not against unions. i'm not against unions. public sector unions using government -- >> i'm against -- i don't think they helped business or the public sector. president obama sending letters. 46. he says they deserve a second chance.

. president obama penning a letter to 46 felons after he pardoned them but didn't reach out to kate steinly's family after she was murdered by an illegal. now, you say the message is our lively hoothd the way we live. your thoughts. >> i think that it's complicating. confusing to understand where and why president obama speaks about certain issues. he tax about the charleston shooting. that's something he should have done. how great a tragedy and the implication for our nation's

immigration policies issue that president obama has owned and track throughed legislation, that he should have spoken out and reached out to the family. >> as president obama spoke out about trayvon martin michael brown, new york charleston baltimore, why not this one? >> well he is willing to acknowledge the tragedy very quickly when he feels as though he can exploit the tragedy. in this case it's politically inconvenient because it's his political party's stance on illegal immigration. that led to the death of this innocent woman. >> okay. what about it wayne? juror thoughts on this? >> i don't have any. you asked the key question. why did he pick up the phone and call? it's a question of decency. as you said it's concerning himself with michael brown and all of himself, the attorney general down to ferguson. he doesn't even pick up the phone and talk to these -- this family. it's insane. >> what about, john your thoughts? >> well eric, it's a terrible situation in san francisco. the president is not a pen pal. he can't be writing letters all day long, and, actually i think

it's pretty inappropriate 44 murders a day in this country, and i just think it's not the president's place to get involved with sending condole answers with everyone no matter how terrible -- >> i think you're right. what about nobody? quick thought. >> what jonathan just said is on target. we have so many murders in this country, and i don't see political people riding this murder. it's a mrekt agenda. that's not the issue. everybody else -- >> i fwot to go. coming up making a deal with a nation. is that all we need to know? this is a

hmm. [cell phone beeps] hey! [police whistle blows] [horns honking] woman: hey! [bicycle bell rings] turn here. there.

excuse me. uh. uh. [indistinct announcement on p.a. system] so, same time next week? well, of course. announcer: put away a few bucks. feel like a million bucks. for free tips to help you save go to ♪ feed the pig ♪

. i want to say thank to our cashin in crew for joining us. can you head to fox news.com/cashin in to see wayne and jonathan as stock pics. time to wake up america. some of you may know before television i spent 17 years making deals in the energy world. i know a good deal when i see it and i definitely know a bad one. the obama-iran nuclear suicide deal is not just a bad deal for america, but it's a dangerous deal for our safety for our security and for our sovereignty. iran gets the bomb. iran gets arms. iran gets ballistic missiles. iran gets to sell oil again, which means iran gets everything they wanted. what do we get? we get nothing. we get used on an international scale again. recall the taliban getting five

commanders in exchange for our single traitor for reference. the worst part of this deal is that iran will now have a massive cash wind fall to pursue the wishes of the mullahs. anyone who has ever done a deal in the real world, we know they won, we lost on everything because iran will cheat. they will enrich uranium. iran will finance terrorism. think about this for a second. there will be iranian oil and the gasoline tanks on i-95 all the way to the 110. our hard earned greenbacks will be used to kill more americans. i can guarantee that. we got the old buy one get one, except we got buy one, get the second one for double. we got the old order now while supplies last. we got the old don't worry, you can cancer at any time. only we can't cancel, and we won't. the stakes aren't just a shamwow or chia pet. they're innocent americans who will be victims of victims of -- that's guaranteed too. before we go, you can see further proof. we got used in this deal. look no further than the

iranians themselves. they celebrate in the streets of tehran. the iranian negotiator is a hero in iran. >> you know folks, i haven't seen iranians celebrate like that since 9/11. wake up, america. night. good night. >> good evening, everybody. i'm lou dobbs. iranians put to the streets today to celebrate after a nuclear deal between iran and six world powers was announced but here in the united states there is seemingly no cheering from anyone outside the obama administration. in fact the president spent the day trying to sell his deal to a skeptical press, white house, press corp. and congress. tonight the leader the most powerful drug trafficking organization in the world is at large after his