tv Cashin In FOX Business April 3, 2016 3:30am-4:01am EDT
3:30 am
>> what is eslt systems? >> it protects goods guys from bad guys? >> i like this one. a good stock. >> good. that is it for "forbes on fox." have a wonderful weekend. keep it right here. eric and "cashin in." j president obama scolding the media for its coverage of the 2016 race crimine i claiming ite for donald trump. >> there's enormous pressure on journalists to fill the void and feed the beast with instant commentary and twitter rumors and celebrity gossip. i believe the ned work would be -- network would be better served if your producers give you the capacity to follo your best instincts and dig deeper for things that may not always be flashing but need attention. >> is that why donald trump is ri rising?
3:31 am
hi. welcome, everybody. the president trying to school the media with a lecture. are we to blame, the media to blame for what's going on and are people fed up with policy. keep this in your mind, how was he treated when he was elected? >> how was he treated when he was elected and treated now? >> unemployment numbers up. those numbers came out yesterday. jobs and unemployment are the top three issues for republicans and democrats. where are the tough questions for the obama administration on all of this? this is this president who won't even come on your network and do an interview who's literally criticizing the media for han handing this somehow to trump. you look at trump, my gosh, if the media digs any deeper on trump they will dig up dinosaur bo bones, eric. all this happened not because of the media. trump rose up because people are tired of being smarter than the people they hire to run the government. >> rebut that. i hear president obama blaming
3:32 am
the media for digging deeper. i don't think he's been dug too deep by the mainstream media. >> i think he has. we'ren "cashin in." let's not forget, we have seen job growth over several years. 5% unemployment. we added jobs just this week. you talk about the acadeeconomy that's pretty good. when it comes to digging, i think a lot of the american media has done just what the president said in terms of go after the ratings. when donald trump was talking about the birther issue, i guess that's digging on obama. everybody played along and went right along with all theliness, ant -- the silliness and anti-immigrant stuff and saying we are trying to recover from a deep recession. that's what you see, i think republican niche media played right into donald trump. >> republican niche media. the vast media is liberal media and they have given president
3:33 am
obama a pass for the most part for the better part of seven years. all of a sudden he's about to leave office, hey, media, start digging deeper? >> it is so offensive. obama is always quick to lecture the media. i'm more sensitive to the business angle where he's quick to business people how they should conduct their business everything from religion to the free press now. i do think obama has in a sense paved the way for trump. there's a lot of similarities. obama's rub is he's always been l lawless. you think about it, trump talks about tariffs, his love for eminent domain and government healthcare, there's not a lot of difference between the two. an authoritarian streak and pragmatic streak that essenti essentially sends principles out the window. >> has this election cycle changed the way media treats candidates or what we've been through in the past? this could be a brand new world in american politics? >> it's certainly a unique
3:34 am
cycle, eric. there's no playbook how to cover donald trump and presents a challenge to the media, how much airtime do you give him versus other candidates? how do you cover someone who has no political history whatsoever in terms of comments made but votes nothing there. it's a challenge for the media. it makes complete since they would try to blame the media for not covering him properly and vetting him properly. i've seen great coverage of donald trump and past business policy and positions. quite frankly, donald trump has used the media to his advantage and taken advantage with a platform with a message that resonated with people. no strappi istopping that. >> let's talk about hillary clinton. unless you're watching fox, you're probably not going to find out too much what's going on with this fbi investigation
3:35 am
into her e-mail service. you don't see it on mainstream media. >> there's a reason for that. just like donald trump gets great ratings, that's why everybody covers donald trump and stsced makes no excuses, whatever donald trump does, we're covering it. all the networks are covering it. by comparison, eric, the democrats are kind of slow and bo boring. talk about the e-mail scandal. most democrats don't care, they don't want to hear about it. they're not tuning in. >> go ahead, john, why don't they care? they should be caring, this could be your next president who may have lied about something and exposed agents overseas. i care, don't you? >> i think it's because the media certainly but also the american public, they don't really think in principles anymore. the fact that hillary is under investigation doesn't mean anything. that's why people are giving a pass for example like donald trump for straying from traditional conservative values. again, i look at it from an
3:36 am
economic perspective, but so many of trump's positions go against even the basis of a free market. the philosophy is anything goes as long as it works. >> jonathan, most of the trump supporters look at it from an economic perspective, too. they are worried about the massive influx of illegals taking jobs. they are worried about their own jobs and constant bad economy. this is the issue space. >> his perspective, especially on economics is so different from what a traditional conservative would be, his flip-flops are now seen as a positive because he's seen as being flexible. this is in my opinion, lack of consistent principles which is what makes him so outrageous in this election. >> if the media were doing their job and they're just coming to this trade issue, which traditionally, republicans favor free trade, they would make it clear, make it clear that in fact america has benefitted from
3:37 am
free trade. >> who? >> the media, we're talking about the media. >> making no argument is debar. >> your -- bizare. >> you're saying it's the media's job to make it on trade or tcovering the various campaigns. they cover it. >> it's not in keeping with republicans and, two, this has helped america. >> their coverage towards an opinion, are you not? >> it's a lack of coverage in my opinion because it doesn't get ratings. >> can i push back for a second? if the public is interested in it, it will rate and the media will cover it. >> what i'm saying is, if your passionate saying america is going down the tubes, america is being ripped off by china, the 3450ed media will cover it. that's sensational. donald trump says we're getting su suck
3:38 am
suckered. >> not covering it the way you want it covered, i'm saying the rebuttal to that commentary isn't covered, have someone say something, have cruz or hillary clinton say something and they will get covered. >> they all follow the trump lead. unless you play the trump game you don't get coverage. even when you do you can't get coverage. >> how is that the media? why blame us? >> that's the point. obama is quick to scold the media. but in a free country the media is the people. juan is right, not only is obama -- excuse me, trump getting an inordinate amount of detailed comp, the fact is people -- detailed coverage, the fact is people do not care. the issue about trade, the fact that trump takes such positions that are -- the converse of what would be a traditional capitalist perspective, they know that, doesn't need coverage but they don't care. >> final word. >> much to the chagrin of some
3:39 am
of trumps' supporters, he'll sit down with any and do an interview about anything and he speaks directly from his heart, at least that's what his supporters see. he has risen up. it has nothing to do with any sweet treatment from the media, if anything they've given him so much time because he does speak so straightforward you never know what you're going to get. coming up, if we don't take refugees in, the president suggesting we should still roll out the welcome
3:40 am
3:43 am
below after new terror attacks when it comes to taking in syrian refugees, should america be thinking twice? our president doesn't think so. >> these attacks ferment fear and division. they contempt us to cast out the stranger. strike out against those who don't look like us. or pray exactly as we do. and they can lead us to turn our backs on those who are most in need of help and refuge. that's the intent of the terrori terrorists. >> the president says we can't afford to turn refgs refugees a. what do you say? >> this is common sense.
3:44 am
if you have a pipe burst in your house and the pipe is flooding, at some point you turn off the water. at some point you have to realize we have been under such massive terror threat we remain under massive terror threat, our economy is tanking to due to the burden of people we can't -- and president obama is wrong. nothing wrong with compassion but nothing says they have to be brought here to be compassionate. we can help them where they are and in other places. >> is this the time to take more syrian refugees in especially after the bruz sell brussels te attacks? >> certainly because of the attack and climate of terror and political implications of that, people feel fear about this. obviously we've seen that play out on the campaign trail with the presidential race. the fact of the matter is, we have been as a country, accepting people from these regions for many years without
3:45 am
incident. refugees from iraq and iran, from syria over many years and hundreds of them. >> the difference this time is that isis has said they are going to infiltrate the syrian refugee program. they told us that. would now be the time to step up our taking of syrian refugees? >> that's certainly the republican argument that we need to insure before we bring in any -- >> shouldn't that be an american argument? republican or not? >> it's actually the argument as well. he argues the screening system we have in place is actually sufficient. we are able to screen these people with confidence they will not execute terror attacks on our soil. republicans disagree and think the screening needs to be a little more stringent. >> what do you say, juan? is this a republican only idea the screening should be more rigid and stringent? >> if i could take a second of personal privilege, gina, i want you to know the stock market is doing great, america's economy
3:46 am
is not tanking, gina. we are doing great. i look at those beautiful boats behind you, i think somebody n owns them. >> i don't know how you deny that fact. >> deny what fact? unemployment is 5% and wall street up through the roof. >> small businesses across the country are hurting. lots of people still out of a job. how can you deny those people? >> i'm not denying anybody. somebody has trouble, i'm aware of it. i'm just telling you america's economy is not tanking. when you say things like that, i think it feeds into anxiety and fear much as this conversation about syrian immigrants. all of a sudden, every immigrant is a demon terrorist. >> no, guys, 29th bring jonathan here. look, if you have a, i don't know, coffee cup with one drop of virus in it probably won't make you sick. are you still going to drink the coffee cup? not going to.
3:47 am
isis says they will infiltrate the syrian program, are you worried? of course you are. >> i've always been about immigration but nonthreatening sustaining immigrants, a boon to our economy specifically like mexico. it is importation, not america's job to feed the sick or help those who ruined it around the world. if individuals want to take refugees in, that's perfectly appropriate. they should be vetted not like what was done during world war ii or the cold war, just opening up our doors to people who are going to take advantage of the entitlement system is not -- although pose a threat, is not an acceptable idea. >> we have to leave it right there. >> big block coming up. not making the grade, college students demanding their school get rid of questions of criminal records from applications for admission. should the plan get a big fat f?
3:48 am
the debate. >> do not raise the minimum wage. >> i would not raise the minimum. >> the drama. >> i won't support donald trump as a candidate. >> the decisions, now, tuesday, as the badger state decides, go with fox business for the ride. lou dobbs at 7:00, ben neil at 8:00, as long as it takes for the candidates, this means everything, for at the end, this everything, for at the end, this
3:50 am
great time for a shiny floor wax, no? not if you just put the finishing touches on your latest masterpiece. timing's important. comcast business knows that. that's why you can schedule an installation at a time that works for you. even late at night, or on the weekend, if that's what you need. because you have enough to worry about. i did not see that coming. don't deal with disruptions. get better internet installed on your schedule. comcast business. built for business.
3:51 am
3:52 am
and dr. jasser. staging a sit-in, nyu stunts demanding stop asking . >> college is a successful st stepping stone to any's life to preclude someone from applying to a university or scare them away to apping to a university because of major offense as a juvenile. >> there is no evidence that those who check the box are more likely to commit crimes on likely to commit crimes on campus. over 30% who don't use the box
3:53 am
and they are far safer than the general american society. >> you know, i find that statement and even though i am generally in support of that position, i am troubled by that decision. it is hard to get in to college in america. there are competitions and you want to know the background of people. it could be a story where they have a criminal background and they are put in school. >> we know of the incident of reoccurring crime among students. >> yes, already 17 states nationwide prohibits employers from asking about criminal history. call me crazy, i cannot think of a more important question of have you ever been in jail. the irony.
3:54 am
>> all right, gina, i have a son that's about the go to college. i would like to know if he's going sit next to a group of criminals or not. is that a fair question to ask? >> that's a fair question. the funny irony here is erick, students want to be paid for things they have done. how about we match them up with students last week in paying because someone wrote "trump 2016" on the sidewalks. >> there you go, let them fight it out. >> thank you very much. changing the rules to when you think about success, what does it look like? is it becoming a better professor
3:55 am
3:58 am
i want to say thank you for your crew joining us. okay, time to wake up america. i filled in for bill o' riley this week. >> can the rule be changed? it is kind of silence or awkward or whatever. is it a rule? you would think so, right? >> i proceeded to pull at that hanging string. i ponder on there. can the establishment change the
3:59 am
rules after conservatives vote on the convention. on wednesday, i have been contacted twice by rnc leadership wanted to talk about riles. i was onto something so i dug in for research and got the rnc rule book. rule 42, among others of the majority rule, the 1237 delegate rule is quoted temporary. essentially, wiping out all of your votes, all of them. i let it be known and i was going to expose this the next day and guess what happens the next day before the o' riley factor aired. the chairman of the rnc went on the record with some clarifications. now, i still have my eyes on them. at least they know we are
4:00 am
watching what they are doing. >> i promise to keep pulling on those loose string on the establishments for you. i know they don't like it but your vote five. ♪ ♪ good evening everyone. i'm lou dobbs. six days before the winner takes wisconsin primary and the latest poll puts ted cruz well ahead of donald trump. a brand-new marquette university poll shows cruz leading trump by ten points in the race for that state's 42 delegates. the poll shows cruz with 40% support compared to trump's 30 and kasich's 21%. it's been a week of mixed emotions and emotional swings for trump who monday celebrated the birth of another grandson and yesterday, is campaign manager charged with misdemeanor simple battery and today, tr
81 Views
1 Favorite
IN COLLECTIONS
FOX Business Television Archive Television Archive News Search ServiceUploaded by TV Archive on