>> good idea. >> good buy. >> great company but overlooked. >> we haven't overlooked it anymore. you now know about it. that's it for "forbes on fox." have a great weekend. thanks for watching. keep it he number-one business block continues. the mainstream media up in arms over donald trump's comments about the future of the second amendment if hillary clinton picks new supreme court judges. >> gets to pick her judges, nothing you can do, folks. [ boos ] although the second amendment people, maybe there is, i don't know. but i'll tell you what, that will be a horrible day. >> the coverage of that one statement dwarfing the coverage of his major economic speech this week. is that unfair and unbalanced? hi, welcome to "cashin' in." our crew this week, morgan, jessica, and kristin. welcome, everybody. critics want trump to give specifics. he finally does it with a long

economic speech. kristin, what is the media focused on, the comment about hillary. >> right. of course, there's always been bias against conservatives in the media. this election has kind of taken it to another level. i mean, there are mainstream outlets that literally cover trump's missteps around the clock. it's gotten to the point where it's predictable and boring. it's not even fun to watch. and of course, the media is completely silent. when anyone on the left makes threats, like no one's talking about the fact that in 2008 hillary clinton basically said she wished obama would be assassinated. no one's talking about it because it's okay to make threats if you're a liberal. i also want to point out that black lives matter members on a regular basis threaten the lives of not only trump but our law enforcement officers. the media gives them a complete pass. they can do it thewith impunity because they're held to a lower standard. >> you ready to go? >> i'm ready. thank you, kristin. >> go for it.

>> no. i mean, going back to hillary's 2008 comment, obviously that was a mistake. she apologized for them. i would like to draw everyone's attention to keith o berman. liberal, ten-minute rant about how inappropriate it was for hillary to make the comments. she done gets a pass whatsoever. >> whoa, whoa, whoa, fair and balanced. no spin zone. i tell you, no. she -- she kind of apologized. she said, hey, listen, i may or may not have intended that. sorry you misinterpreted it. then she went ahead and apologized. "the new york times" wrote that up as a big, massive things. >> no one should be joke being political assassination. those are the fact. trump's economics, the speech, we discussed it and everyone was talking about how he smoothly read from a teleprompter, exciting things. he laid out details. they haven't been able to score his plan because there are still murky details out there. when you talk about that and go on the day after to say that president obama is the founder of isis, double down, triple

down, quadruple down, and it's sarcasm today, that's how you end up co-opting the media cycle into negative attention. >> negative attention. yes, let me tell you something -- i'm going throw to morgan. we'll get back to you. morgan, the media is so, so biased against trump. granted they would be biased against any gop-er. it's a liberal media. >> i agree. if you look at what romney went through of course years ago, what mccain had to go through in 2008, this isn't new to the republican party. what i think that trump and his team need to do if they want to win in november, they can't spend the next three months complaining about the media bias. it's there. it exists. we've known this for decades as it relates to republican candidates. there has to be a new strategy going forward to say this is how we're going to win in november. right now, the polls don't look great. so complaining about the facts on the ground aren't going to change things. what the trump campaign needs to do is go back to the central message that works for him which talks about running against the establishment and running

against a rigged system that hillary clinton embodies and personifies. >> let me do, this i want to talk about there a bit. david duke endorsing trump. the media research center, i think that group put this together, said there was six times more coverage of david duke's endorsement of donald trump and what happened thereafter than this. take a look here, guys. that what that is, that's sadiq mateen, father of the orlando shooter, the guy who killed 49 in the orlando pulse nightclub. he's sitting directly behind hillary clinton. i find this outrageous. i find it ridiculous. kristin, i don't even think the campaign ever said we reject having that guy -- >> they did. >> go ahead. maybe i'm wrong. >> it took 24 hours, though. it took way too long to disavow his support. i have no idea how he got in there. you know, secret service should have known. they don't control where people get seated, but they absolutely should have known. there's no excuse for it. it took too long for the clinton campaign to comment on it. >> let's stay on this. why is there six times more

coverage of david dukes saying i endorse donald trump than this going on here? >> well, look, here's another perfect example of what you're talk being, eric. so when trump made those comments about khan, his comments got 50 times, 50 times more coverage than when hillary clinton called pat smith, the mother whose son died in benghazi, she questioned that woman who was a grieving mother, her memory. that got no coverage. trump's comments it khan's wife got 50 times more coverage. there is media bias, but i'm telling you, eric, this might blow up in the media's face. they're being so blatant. the outlets are losing readership by the day. people get their news line now because they don't trust outlets like "the new york times." >> i'm curious about the bias argument. disgraced gop congressman mark foley was sitting right behind donald trump at one of his rallies. we barely heard about that. >> yeah, we can't compare a congressman to someone -- someone to the father of a mass murderer. >> no one's taking responsibility for that -- >> no, his son was a mass

murderer, and he's had anti-american statements. from a security perspective, he should have never been allowed. >> can i give another one? i don't have the picture. i wish i had it. i took it on my cell phone. yesterday i was watching another network, and the banner underneath -- they were talking about donald trump's comment about whether or not barack obama was the founder of isis or not. it says, "trump says obama founder of isis," in the banner they put, he's not. that is outrageous. for journalistic television who claims to be a news organization to editorialize on a comment. state what you're saying, but don't editorialize on the banner. >> i don't know. i assume it was cnn who's been doing live fact checks news because you can't keep one trump and the garbage that he's spewing out there. and i think what they're doing -- it was john berman who was the first anchor to go toe to toe about this where he said the facts on the ground are that isis was born out of al qaeda in iraq in 2006, which was under

george bush's wash. what cnn is doing now is to live editorialize, yes, to make sure viewers know that what donald trump is doing is not true. >> you can't do that -- >> why not? today -- >> you think it's okay for a news network to live editorialize -- >> it's not an opinion. >> on a news program? i get the opinion programs. but this was the middle of the day, news. >> yes, it is middle of the day. no viewer should walk away and think that president obama is the founder of isis. marco rubio today disavowed the comments saying obviously the president is not a founder of isis. it's radical jihad. let's stay with this. morgan? >> when it comes to editorializing, i agree. if it's news of the day, we should stockton the news of the day. here's the problem -- trump has had over $3 billion of earned media in this primary, unprecedented for anybody. there is the trouble that comes with the strategy of saying things which is his stated strategy which he said he's going to stick with.

the problem is with the strategy, the more he says stuff, the more coverage it gets. worked in the primary. it's not working in the general. if he wants to win, he needs to pivot. >> kristin? >> i think it's important to point out that trump's sins are rhetorical, things he's saying. hillary clinton's done things, she's done things. look at secretary of state, benghazi, the e-mail scandal. she has no regard for the law. she has done bad things. trump may say things people don't like, but he doesn't have the horrible track record that hillary clinton has, that the media ignores. >> i'll give you a rebuttal really quick, if you can. tough one. >> it's tough but not that tough. i would say there are plenty of people -- he's running on being a great businessman. you'll get the evidence there, a number of lawsuits, people saying he stiffed them. the fact that all of the buildings tt bear his name. he doesn't own them. obviously everyone regrets the

decision for military person nell benghazi. i understand that and know that's what you're running on. you're running on that and the e-mail scandal which i -- >> and the pay to play, and the -- >> the clinton foundation. >> you guys, it's -- >> we ran out of time. >> i can't take. it. coming up, after terror attacks and plots, one country in europe looking to make it harder for refugees to come in. why is the u.s. planning to take in even more?

announcer: when some people struggle with their mortgage payments, they become frozen. petrified. not knowing what to do, they do nothing. but the people who do something, the people who take action, are far more likely to get the most positive outcome. making home affordable is a free government program. call now to talk one-on-one with a housing expert about the options that are right for you. real help. real answers. right now.

the calls in germany, raiding homes and workplaces of suspected terrorist. after attacks they're making it

easier to kick out suspicious refugees. in the u.s. a new report shows more than 27,000 refugees from terror-related nations entered our country just this year. morgan, time to learn from germany's mistakes? >> eric, i think the biggest things that we need to do is take a step back when it looks to the refugee policy. when it comes to the syrian refugee, the saudi, the qataris, these people in the region, do you know how many refugees they've taken in? zero. they need to be leading the effort for the syrian refugees. my heart goes out to the women, children, and young men who are fleeing war-torn countries. i feel very badly for those people. the problem is is that we're making this a european and american problem, and it shouldn't be. it should be a problem for -- a problem for the region to solve. this is the saudi, the qataries, the emeratis, this is part of their culture, these are fellow arabs. they should be leading the international refugee effort. instead, they're pushing the problem off to europe and america. that's the inherent problem. >> jess, what would the harm be

in the u.s. wants to be philanthropic, take care of people, as morgan points out, poor people, refugees, and we just send them money? we send memorial e them money -- i don't care, find a country, an island, and end this them money. why do we have to bring them to the homeland? >> it's part of a long tradition we have in the united states and a treaty obligation to take in refugees, as morgan says. these are people from war-torn countries. they have been persecuted, pushed out. that's part of our obligation. i do completely agree, though, that other middle eastern countries should be pulling . obviously what germany's done, which was having an open-door policy versus ours, 18 to 24 months of vetting, is very different. i would say the figure, are you correct, about 28,000 refugees from these terror hotbed countries have come here. that doesn't say how many have turned to terrorism. just because someone comes from that place doesn't make them a terrorist. >> well, it did in germany, kristin. it did in maybe brussels. i mean, so there is proof that

this happens. and the more refugee you take, the more likelihood it's going to take. >> absolutely. the fact hillary clinton's supporters are okay with letting all of these unvetted migrants into the country blows my mind. i thought that orlando would wake up liberals -- >> they are vetted -- >> apparently it's not. first of all, how can you be so naive to say they're vetted? james comey said that we do not -- we do not vet these people. there's no way to vet them all. that our fbi has told us that. but the point is is that it's apparently going to take a very horrific, large terrorist attack to wake up these liberals. i don't know what it's going to take. it could take a bomb going off in -- >> i'm wide awake, wide awake. >> could it take the empire state building coming down. how many more -- >> i'll let you get back, jess, but all it takes its one. one terrorist to kill a bunch of people. >> right. >> what's the downside to at least stopping right now and saying, hold o let's figure this

out, see if our vetting process -- you say it's perfect, but -- >> no, no. >> i assure you it's not. it's got to be perfect, though, jess. it has to be. it can't be 99% accurate. it has to be 100%. >> hate to do it, but we know background checks in this country are not perfect. we don't stop gun sales across the board. we have to -- >> it's our right, our constitutional right. you're talking about something -- there's nothing constitutional about -- >> we have treaty obligations. i'm not saying it's in our constitution, but we do. we have national security experts, kissinger, petraeus, chuck hagel, signing an open letter saying that we cannot stop the refugee process or taking in refugees. we need to be smart about it. hillary clinton wants to put in more money to these programs to make sure that we are doing it to the best possible ability. it takes 18 to 24 months. for kristin to say these are unvetted people -- >> i know what she's saying about. james comey did say people are

getting in with less-than-perfect vetting. morgan? >> we have a vetting process. orlando, this is a home-grown terrorist. >> right. >> the vetting process clearly is not perfect. again, i think we're putting the cart before the horse. i think we should put a moratorium on all of this and say we need talk to the neighbors in the region. we have to solve syria. we have to solve the civil war in iraq. we have to solve the civil war in libya, or refugee are still going to happen. this region has been decimated by isis and al qaeda and the failures of this administration to address the growing threats in the region and america. until we address all of that, we're going to talk about refugees from now until kingdom come. >> there you go. coming up, we're spending a weekend at bernie's. no, not the movie, bernie sanders' new beach house. does his big purchase mean the pro social exist a capitalist, or as some critics say, a hypocrite? we debate, you decide. you do all this research

on a perfect car, then smash it into a tree. your insurance company raises your rates... maybe you should've done more research on them. for drivers with accident forgiveness, liberty mutual won't raise your rates due to your first accident. liberty mutual insurance.

bernie's warming up to capitalism? >> i don't know. he said he was a democrat socialyist, not a straight-up socialist. >> what's the difference, help me out. >> i don't know. come on, too early for that. i mean, it was inheritance

money. i don't care. i'm glad he's out of the race. party on. >> why did he give whatever -- he has three, should give two away, right? >> absolutely, yeah. i mean, i don't want to move up to vermont, but yeah. definitely give it back. redistribute that money. >> redistribute -- kristin, what do you say? beach house? >> certainly, bernie supporters are probably very disillusioned and disappointed this week. that's because they don't know what socialism is. bernie finally gave them the education they wanted for free by showing them how socialism works. socialist leaders always live in mansions while their countrymen live in perpetual poverty. that's how it work. this is just another example of progressive hypocrisy. they always do this. they want to take away everyone's guns if they're armed by security. they love the public schools but send their kids to elites private schools. another example. >> morgan? >> i'm a free-market conservative. if bernie sanders wants to buy ten houses, good for him. i hope he starts to understand the tenets of capitalism and the free market belief that

republicans believe in. and listen, i'm not going to demagogue him for it. i think it's stupid. >> allow me to do that. >> i'm all for capitalism, too. don't play o like you're a socialist interested in redistributing everyone's wealth. by the way, the poor kids running around with like no clothes and haven't taken a shower in three weeks, expecting the socialist, and here's what they get -- a guy with three beach houses, jess. >> i mean, again, i wouldn't go as far as kristin. obviously, there are a lot of socialist countries in europe that don't sound at all like what you were describing. and everyone has -- >> no. >> hey, here's what i'm describing. i'm describing what i saw in philadelphia. i spent a lot of time amongst the people of the bernie sanders crowd. >> i did, too. >> it was a bit smelly. >> i was in philly and didn'ty into the bernie sanders folks or the anarchists, people burning stuff. free market capitalism, rock on. >> got to go. coming up, joining a flag on the nfl for refusing america's team honor america's fallen

thanks for our "cashin" crew for joining us. if you watch this show and other shows i'm involved in you know i love football any level, any time. i enjoy the nfl. i think roger goodell has done a heroic job building that brand of football. he had to negotiate a lot of big deals and many potentially catastrophic scandals. but the nfl has come through with minor scars. also if you watch this program and others i'm involved with you know i have a serious soft spot in my heart for law enforcement. these men and women lay their lives on the line day in and day out along with our military, there are few americans who risk the ultimate sacrifice to maintain peace and order in our communities. in other words, they strap on kevlar vests so we don't have to. that said, there's been talk about the nfl rejecting the

dallas cowboys' request to put a sticker on their helmet to honor the caps killed last month. the nfl are a corporation with the right to decide what their product looks like. one team shouldn't pick an issue and change the uniform. think of it this way, let's say those st. louis rams who came on to the field in the days after the ferguson unrest with their hands up, that was a nod to the hands up, don't shoot black lives matter claim michael brown was shot with his hands up. he wasn't. now say there is an owner who wanted to put blm on the team's helmet. the nfl would rightly reject that, as well. let's not be hypocritical here. neither issue belongs on the team's helmets. roger goodell is a reasonable man. send this suggestion to the commissioner, why not make a law enforcement weekend in the nfl. you have successful military weekends, breast cancer months, i would love to see a weekend

honoring the men and women who strap on the kevlar vests. i hope you consider this important group of heroes. have a great weekend, everybody. lou dobbs. nearly two weeks into august and it looks as if hillary clinton is losing her post convention bounce in the polls. a new bloomberg politics poll shows clinton still leading trump 50 to 44%, but the 6-point lead is cut in half from the 12 point clinton lead in june. as for donald trump, to his credit, he is not backing down from the manufactured outrage in the liberal mainstream media over his comments on second amendment people trying to stop hillary clinton. the republican nominee told sean hannity he's talking about the political movement that would mobilize and vote against