in congress. >> game on. i want to be a flay on the wall this is a bipartisan issue. for these meetings. i think daca is a bipartisan stuart: bombshell in the swiss issue. we have an opportunity to get this done for the american alps. stuart: i want to bo. ii want to go. people. when it comes to chain migration in the lottery system, we sought can you work it so i see the to recent terror attacks in new york that were the result of bomb-thrower in chief? neil: there is a davos, this, i think, failed immigration policy. we would like to see that fixed new york. just let you know. for the american people and a right up the highway. thank you very, very much, excuse my voice here. lot with this, bob talked about we want to get right to this. sanctuary cities. you and i talked about this extensively. we think our bill, our house not only president going to bill will be a good starting davos, 12 republicans, eight ground for this negotiation and democrats, the top, top i too want to commend you for leadership of both parties to hammer out a broad understanding bringing everybody together. what we don't want to see happen to move the talk at that thing forward. he wants a wall. is for the conditions for daca to occur again. democrats want daca. we want to give security done so there doesn't appear to be we don't have to deal with this middle frowned on this hey, problem five more years down the blake. reporter: we'll hear from road. president trump as he makes so thank you, sir. >> there's so many points of remarks on camera, the pool agreement and common sense and i photographers and cameramen have think it's come out very well. gone in we expect to hear from

david, do you have something to the president quite literally within minutes. say? >> yeah, my observation is over we're getting headlines what the the last 11 years, well-intentioned people, some in president said. much of what the he and this room do what we are white house reiterated on this starting to do today and have failed. deal. he wants an end to chain i think the difference is their mission creek ended up to comprehensive in my encouragement for all of us is migration. in exchange for a solution to to do what dick durbin has been fix to daca, the "dreamers," he trained to do, to limit the wants to secure the u.s. border, scope of this. i like the idea both sides have i.e., he wants a bored he wall. pressure for solving the daca the border wall is a big issue for democrats. as you mentioned eight democrats inside of this meeting, issue. what can we do to solve this alongside with 12 republicans. the white house feels this group immigration problem. for several reasons. of 20 is a group that really wants to see a solution, get social issues, political issues, through the politics of all of economic issues about her this, come up with some sort of workforce that have to be a compromise. addressed. limiting this to the illegal all things circle back to the immigration side in combining a balance between various solutions on the daca as well as wall. the white house doesn't understand why it's a roadblock for democrats. here is mark short, head of legislative affairs earlier border security and chain migration. today speaking with stuart there it might balance of a good varney. >> also something 54 senate

deal that can be done. democrats voted $40 billion in i don't think it's going to take border security including long to get it done. we just lock yourself in a room physical barriers in 1919. and made it happen. it is 2006 secure fence that >> i think you're right. it needs to be done very chuck schumer voted for. they have already voted to do quickly. anything need to be set prior to these things. they are trying to politicize the press leaving? that donald trump is president. >> one comment, lives hanging in now we need this for the security of our country. the balance are those of our reporter: to give you a visual, you have to the the president, military. leading equipment and funding in top advisors, 20 different everything they need to keep us members of congress, safe in we should not be playing republicans, democrats, members politics on this issue to stop of the house as well. our military from getting the funding they need. i'm told the white house will be laying out some of its we had the right people to proposals. resolve this issue could the a handful of what i was given deadline is march 5th. what the president wants to see the total purse is and work on the wall, those detained at border, ending loopholes, chain together. let's not play politics with that. let's give them what they need to keep us safe. migration, details he wants to see. >> i would agree with that. i can't say more than ever i'm told the it will be given by the white house later today. before. we've had wars, a lot of other neil: corner of wall and broad where stocks are raising ahead. there is a lot of optimism ahead areas, but we need our military of earnings season. we have standouts like j&j. desperately. we are rebuilding quickly and

not only one advancing like boeing, what could be a good negotiating much better deals with purveyors and manufacturers reflection on tax cuts going further and deeper than a lot of much better than it was before. people thought. talk about the president being crazy or not fit for office. this is wall street's way of both said started off at saying bring us more crazy. $1.5 billion they are up to charlie gasparino, realpolitiks, $18 billion in bill not finished. reporter caitlyn huey burns and in this case a particular aircraft carrier is outrageous. "national review" contributes we are very much agree with you. editor, deroy murdoch. begin with you, end with you. there is a dichotomy and a >> i want to follow up on that. split. someone is nuts. who is it? >> who are the people a month no democrats that want to make ago on the first anniversary of sure the military funded the election outside in public properly. parks screaming at tops of their over the last four years we have lungs. these people opposed an agreement between mr. ryan and senator murray that we donald j. trump. what was donald j. trump doing a understand the military is few weeks ago? negotiating and making decisions on biggest overhaul of the tax important, but we also understand that her domestic code in 31 years. these are complex and details he issues, whether it's health had to make. care, environment, transportation and from all reports he was involved in this. infrastructure, they are that did not look to me like the important as well. work after madman.

both the defense and nondefense neil: what do you think? sides of the budget are hurting >> this administration has a a t to tout, tax reform being chief when you have this er because they cannot plan and they cannot among them. big legislative accomplishment. unraveling of regulations under lead contracts that they don't obama administration, whether or have any money to do so. not you agree with them, you very frankly, this alley is count that as accomplishment, the judicial appointments are huge. the president is tweeting what correct, but what we ought to have done over the last six months, particularly this he wants to talk about. the nuclear button with september when we give 90 days north korea. engaging the author of this book is to reach some agreement on what attacks are going to be. about the question of mental stability and fitness. he could easily have ignored the ryan agreements were a that. parody and we believe that it's there is plenty of information very important. out there that shows big flaws we should get to where we should get and want to get there, but in this book. yet he continues to engage this we ought to have an agreement conversation which raises the question why does he want to talk about this? based upon -- why not just move on to the things you described. >> we do have to take politics neil: charlie. >> markets are really rational out of the military. all the other things we talk about. we are not going to be here if we don't have the right beings, they don't have military. we need the military stronger than ever before and we are political side and they look at trump this way -- you and i both ready to do it. criticized his tweets a lot. we don't like it, but we think one thing that i think i can

it takes him off message but really get on a bipartisan basis markets are saying it is funny, and the republican side and we don't care what he says about the button thing even though that sound outrageous and stupid. great support from the republicans is infrastructure. the markets say we don't care about that they don't believe he i think we'll have a lot of is going there. neil: they don't take him support from both sides and i'd like to get it done as quickly as possible. seriously. serious economic market agenda seriously making folks a lot of >> mr. president, i too want to money. >> it is pretty simple. thank you for getting us barack obama came out of the together. he made the point last week that financial crisis into the great why are we continuing to have recession and basically threatened to raise taxes, these meetings to get to a impose mandates on companies. did impose mandates on solution as we are today if you companies. he basically hindered a recovery insisted on a bipartisan basis. part of my job is to count votes out of way when the fed started in the senate. to essentially print money. as you know when you hosted the leadership at camp david this he slowed down. it was stimulative on the fed's weekend, i believe both the case and destimulative on obama's case. totally irrational. speaker and majority leader mcconnell made crystal clear neil: you want to give president obama credit for that, we came that they would not proceed with out of a meltdown. >> the steps he took coming out the bill before the senate of that meltdown were pretty irrational from economic unless it had your support, unless he signed it.

standpoint. neil: not as if he sat on his hand and did nothing. >> no. that is the picture we need to but he did bad things. that is the reason why we have be looking through, the lens we need to look there was not only president trump. seven years we had economic what could we agree to on a bipartisan basis, and do what expansion, very weak. it was supposed to end after seven years and it didn't. you sign into law because we all that is the biggest want to get a solution here and accomplishment. neil: maybe it was weak, right? >> i would say someone who not for me frames the issues. doesn't give this president a lot of credit on a lot things -- >> thank you, very well said. neil: you hate everyone. >> i hate everyone he did smart one of the reasons i'm here is exactly that. things with regulations and economy that kept this thing going. not only going, it is now normally you'd have democrats, republicans and maybe nothing would get done. accelerating. >> now the private sector stepping in. you know, our system lenses self americans tax reform put together a list of 117 companies to not getting things done. now extending bonuses, 401(k) i hear so much about your marks, the old earmark system with a contributions. $400 million in charitable great friendliness when you have donations to wells fargo. your marks, but of course they had other problems on earmarks, neil: largest health insurance but maybe all of you should start thinking about going back company. >> baltimore power company to a form of earmarks. lowering rates 5.2%. the private sector is stepping in keeping this going. >> this is investing show. [laughter] i buy stocks. there are things out there that could snuff this out. well, you should do it and i am

neil: absolutely. here with you because this >> inflation. a bubble in junk bonds or something where the fed has to really lends itself to not getting along. radically raise interest rates. inflation is another one. >> nuclear weapons. it lends itself to hostility and anger and hate the republican >> a war obviously. trump engaging inner populace and democrats. in the old days of earmarks you can say what you want about trying to get rid of nafta. certain presis and others who may not going out to dinner in april, who knows what happens at night and they all got along when the personal side of this tax cut kick in people in a lot and they pass bills, that was an earmark system. of states find out they pay more in taxes. neil: do you think it is maybe we should think about it different, caitlyn it, does make and we have to put better a difference having a controls because they got a little bit out of hand, but businessman in office, people maybe that brings people may call him crazy as bedbug, together. our system the way it set up whatever, we would not be where will never bring people we are on these markets and i am together. i think we would get this done, proving economy, without someone daca. i hope we'll get infrastructure like donald trump being there? done in the same way, but you should look at a form of >> you could hearing this tax bill could have been passed earmarks. i see lindsay nodded and very under traditional republican. >> that's true. happily. >> a lot of what he has done is [inaudible] in the more traditional [laughter] if you want to get along and you want to get this country moving, republican route. >> that is not crazy. rolling again, this is obviously neil: that is a good point. >> what he did was incredibly out of control. sane. a crazy man would have indulged i'm not talking about trump, the

steve bannon right after the bat, let's get rid of nafta. neil: hang on that because jamie eight years of obama and before dimon was talking to maria that. the animosity and hatred between bartiromo about people have to republicans and democrats. step back from the tax cut and i remember when i used to go out in washington tonight the see the advantages. listen to this. >> they took away the "salt" democrats having dinner with republicans and they were best friends and everybody got along. deduction. you live in new york. you lost the ability to deduct you don't see that much anymore. state and local taxes. was that the right move? when was the last time you took a republican out to dinner? >> it is a hard question. the answer is yes. i always look at questions, what you don't see it. should been. should have never been there. it should never been there. totally different from this meeting is when they get daca how they phase it out, remember, don, we will all try very hard. increasing standard deduction, maybe you should start ringing having $10,000, i haven't seen real analysis yet, 70% of the back a concept of earmark that people get to keep it. it is 30% making over 2 or 3 or will bring it together, do it honestly, get rid of the 400,000 don't get to keep it. problems the other system on, it does create a burden for new york, but new york city and but one thing it did is they new york state can figure it brought everyone together in out. maybe they will change it at one this country has to be brought together. thank you. point. i always ask what is the right thing to do? answer that question first before yelling and screaming yes, lindsay. what is good for me.

>> at 6:40, especially if you're a patriot. we have all the flaws in the system as people protect their [inaudible] own special interests. i think it was huge police take. [laughter] neil: talking about people making 2 or 3 or 400,000. >> jamie made last year [inaudible] >> i think it was a bipartisan agreement with the other guy. multimillions. >> more than we did. neil: he says you have to be a i think it's a very important patriot and quit whining. thing because our system is >> he should be a patriot. jamie dimon is a newcomer to designed right now that supplied economics. everybody should meet each other i love jamie. and we can't have that. good guy, known him for years. we have a great country. i knew him when neither of us a country that is doing very had gray hair. put it this way, real tax reform well in many respects in a new you take down the rates and high in the stock market again. eliminate the deductions. neil: he is saying with all of i don't look at the stocks. that, this is better. i look at the jobs, 401(k)s, >> net-net better. what is happening, where police i'm just saying -- neil: you argue that it is comeuppance a thank you. better? >> this is better. you're making me look like a what we're seeing, what we're financial genius, literally, already seeing in certain states people who normally would be meaning about them and their wives never thought that was raising taxes we better not raise taxes people will run like hell. already happening in new jersey. possible. the country is doing well in so neil: not so fast. many ways, but they're such they might change their minds. devices missed, such division >> they might but tapping on the and i really believe we can

brakes. solve that in terms of getting one thing president trump has done that is really sane not together. i will leave it up to you, but i just regulations and tone. really believe you can do under obama you didn't build something to bring it together. that, you're terrible, you're the bad guy. under president trump, you're good guy, create jobs, keep it up. neil: i wonder if he would say >> i don't think i've seen a better chance of getting it done that about oprah, she built her than i do right now. john is right, i'm not going to billion dollar fortune. >> self-made billionaire. support a bill if you don't support it. >> he has in the past. i've had my head be it a bunch. i'm still standing. as we're heading into the midterms whether the president gets credit from the public for you name every name you want to any of this. >> that is great point. give to me it's been assigned to >> in the polls yes, people me. the people of south carolina, think the economy is getting better on paper. yes, some say it is getting how can i get elected? better from them but they're not i've been for a pathway to citizenship for 11 million giving the president credit for that. this tax bill is very unpopular. people because i have no animosity. i don't want croaks. i do want that ombre's. the opportunity for those ratings to improve. >> democrats demagogued it, i want to make sure we can succeed in the 21st century. paul ryan and those guys, the i'm more than willing to be real pitfall is not that middle fair. i don't want to be doing this every 20 years. class people, working-class people who don't pay a lot of what made the decision not to do federal income tax as opposed to a comprehensively. that's a smart decision, but a payroll tax, it will be tinies hard decision. we passed three comprehensive paul ryan allowed the democrats bills with over 65 boat.

to demagogue it. where the tax bill could run into trouble and problematics you have to see who it souths this is just politics if your republican house member turning out in april, could be on personal side. on the vote. people pay local and state to my democratic friends, thanks income taxes in iowa and minnesota. not just new york are screwed. for coming. they resist movement hates this guy. they don't want him to be >> democrats path to the successful at all. you turn on fox news and making majority in the house runs her the drumbeat coming. through a slew of states in california where they're going to get hit, a bunch of districts right-wing radio and tv talkshow hosts are going to beat the out in new jersey and northbound. of us because attended all over take those alone, they're banking on this to have the effect that you're talking again. i don't know if the republican about. and democratic party can define neil: although need is 24. >> although need is 24. you're already seeing love, but we can do is let the retirements. >> gdp growth is at 3 1/2, 4%, i american people want us to do. 52% of the trump voters support think that overwhelms all these a pathway to citizenship for the other things with the economy charging forth particularly daca kids if you have strong among young people. they have a lot of young borders. you have created an opportunity, friends, 20s, early 30s, they have never seen economy mr. president and you need to close the deal. that is growing. low growth, people at each other's throats, racial tension, >> thank you, lindsay. it is very interesting because i do have people come and just use people pay their bills and are happy, totally different environment. >> i agree with you. a very common term, very far this is question mark on the right and very far left.

personal side here. listen, if you make $200,000 a year and you're getting a tax very unhappy about what we are doing. i really don't believe they have increase -- neil: you're not being a patriot. >> that is insane. neil: you're not being a to. when you talk about patriot. comprehensive immigration >> doing better if you're getting a pay raise. reform, which is where i would like to get to eventually, if we >> they will not spend it -- neil: all about charlie, me, me. do the right bill here, we are >> this is where the fitness and not very far away. stability of the white house comes into play, right? so if you are seeing benefits we've done most of it. we do this properly, daca. from this, will this rally you to turn out to vote for more not so far away from comprehensive immigration republicans or something that reform. if you want to take the further energizes democrats. step, i'll take the heat. neil: this has to be something i'll eat you want to give them before november. it can not be delayed effect. and both the democrats and >> more than $10 a week in your republicans. my whole life has been heat. paycheck. neil: somebody not being a i like eat in a certain way. patriot. as these guys are talking, as but i will. expected, we touched on this, you are somewhat more traditional politicians than two prior hour did, joe arpaio will run for the senate seat held by and a half years ago i was never thinking in terms of politics. jeff flake. here we go. you guys have been doing in all of your lives. i'll take all the heat you want, more after this. and you are not that far away from comprehensive immigration ♪

reform. if you want to go the final step you should do it. if you like earmarks to bring us together, you should study it. >> i'd like to talk about the reality of the whole situation and what senator cornyn and grandmas side of the necessity of you working with us and you are doing that by having this meeting and other meanings as well. we've always talked in the united states senate about the necessity of getting 60 votes and that is pretty darn tough. if we would write a bill that you don't like any of the go it, we are talking about a 67 vote threshold, two thirds in the united states senate. that is a reality of negotiating in good faith and getting something you can sign. the second reality is the march date that is coming out. if we don't do good faith negotiations and make good progress and get a bill on the

floor of the united states senate, our leader will have to bring up either the house bill would've though some of us are introducing and we are going to have a vote on it and those dad promised he would teach me how to surf on our trip. people that don't want to vote to legalize daca kid are going when you book a flight then add a hotel you can save. to have to explain why they haven't wanted to protect the 3 waves later, i think it was the other way around... vulnerable people that we are all here talking about. ♪ we're talking about everything except doing something for the everything you need to go. daca kids. i would vote for a path to citizenship which isn't very easy for me, but i would do it expedia. just as an effort. every truck guy has their own way of conveying powerful. yeeaaahhh boy. there's certain things we've got a guarantee we are going to do. kind of looks like a monster coming to eat ya. >> that is going to be brought holy smokes. that is awesome. up. i really believe it will be strong. brought up is what we are you got the basic, and you got the beefy. talking about. i just think it looks mean. it's an incentive for people to incredible. do a good job. no way. the whole path is an incentive start your year off strong a new chevy truck. for people. and they are not all kids. get a total value of over $9,600 we used to talk about kids. they are not really kids. on this silverado all star when you finance with gm financial. it would be an incentive to work

find new roads at your local chevy dealer. hard and do a good job. >> talk about legalizing people here that didn't break the law because their parents who broke the law brought them here and we ought to be talking about what we can do to get the job done and not worry about a lot of other things and that means i knew at that exact moment ... we've got to make sure that we i'm beating this. tell the american people and my main focus was to find a team of doctors. take a step that we are doing something that all the people it's not just picking a surgeon, agree to it. it's picking the care team and feeling secure in where you are. >> mr. president, let me just visit cancercenter.com/breast say i think we agree with what chuck grassley just said. retail. under pressure like never before. and it's connected technology >> when was the last time that that's moving companies forward fast. happened? >> we need to take care of the e-commerce. real time inventory. daca kids and they'll agree on virtual changing rooms. that. 86% of the american public agrees on that. that's why retailers rely on comcast business to deliver consistent network speed with all due respect, bob and mike and wednesday, and there across multiple locations. every corporate office, warehouse and store are some things you are proposing that will be very near or far covered. controversial and an impediment to agreement. leaving every competitor, threat and challenge outmaneuvered. >> he will sit down and say we

comcast business outmaneuver. can agree here. we will give you half of that. >> comprehensive means comprehensive. >> if you want to go there it's okay. >> many of the things that i mentioned that to be a part of the negotiations regarding comprehensive immigration reform. >> of you want to take it a step further. you may complicate it and you may delay daca him why. >> he said at the outset we need to face this. we have a deadline looming and a lot of lives hanging. we can agree on some very fundamental and important things neil: we are still awaiting remarks from the president. he is at immigration meeting on the future for visas. meeting with top democratic and i worked on it for six months republican -- not the deep, deep with michael bennet and schumer top, for example, paul ryans, nancy pelosis, that bunch but just under them. 20 in total senators, 12 and mccain and jeff flake and republicans and democrats, it took us six months to put it senators and representatives,

together. and, when that meeting is done the tape is quickly fed to the world and we play it back. you mention a number of factors it has been going on a while. that are going to be controversial. i have a feeling when we start >> i think you're going to playing the tape it will go right up through tucker tonight, which is on fnc, would be a moot negotiate. it is possible we are not going to agree with you. point on this channel but you there should be no reason for us get the drill. not to get this done. meanwhile north and south chuck, i will say when this group comes back, hopefully with korea holding rare talks first time in couple years and one an agreement, this week and thing we got out of it they're ready to play ball or play in others to the senate and the house comes back with an the the games, olympic games. agreement, einstein in it. i'm not going to say i want this that is slated for south korea or that. i'll be signing it because i next month. connell mcshane has more. have a lot of confidence for the reporter: face-to-face talks people in this room that you with high-level officials of come up with something really good. these countries, the north senator, would you like to say something? >> i would. as you know, we try for comprehensive immigration sending a delegation to the south in south korea. reform. there were a number of they also holding talks about amendments come a lot of attention in the judiciary easing military re tensions. committee and then the house couldn't take it out. national security council spokesperson at the white house saying north korea's participation is quote, an i think there needs to be a opportunity for the regime to willingness on both sides and i see the value of ending its

international isolation by don't know how you would feel about this, but i would like to denuclearizing. that is the issue and debate. ask the question, what about a there was no mention at all in the statement from north and south korea about the north's clean daca bill now with a nuclear program. commitment that we go into a in fact in its statement comprehensive immigration reform like we did back when timothy north korea went out of its way all of its weapons are quote, only aimed at the united states. was here. it was really a major, major so some foreign policy saying this is nothing more than a effort and new ways an propaganda victory for the north. buys them time until after the appointment. olympics. president trump in addition to >> i think that is basically the meeting he is having now, has defense secretary jim mattis on his schedule this afternoon what dick durbin is saying. we'll adduce daca and that we at the white house so maybe we can start on phase two, which would be comprehensive. hear more about this later but for now the news is north korea sending athletes to compete and i think a lot of people would like to see that. tae kwon do demonstration team and group of reporters and >> mr. president, you need to be journalists to the olympics. the athletes from the two clear. what senator feinstein is asking countries might march into the here, we don't want to be back opening ceremony together because some see it as a big here two years later. you have to have security at the deal because it hasn't happened secretary would tell you. at a sporting event. >> i think that's what she said.

they did it at asian winter games. there you go. neil: thank you very much, my friend. we're getting more from the >> u.s.a. in security as well? meeting going on at the white house where the president supposedly said he would be open to support doing a separate bill >> i think we have some just on daca, measure that would meaningful comprehensive address the children of illegals immigration reform, that is where the security goes and if who got into this country, sometimes when they were just babies, would protect them or we can get the daca bill because prevent them from being kicked march is coming and people are out of the country. losing their status every day. it's a central issue for democrats. the president seems seems to be >> security was voted on just a few years ago and no disrespect saying i'm willing to work on this separately, get something agreed to on that. people on the room on the other whether that would be crucial to side of the aisle who voted for getting the wall done, as quid pro quo. it. senator clinton voted for it. but that he would do this in chunks. anyway we keep you posted on i don't think that's that. we'll go to the spray of that meeting when we get the tape. comprehensive. dealing with daca at the same in the meantime on this time is what the president is making. north korea situation, the it is like three pillars. former assistant secretary of the daca because we all never defense larry korb. want to do it. secretary, very good to have border security and chain you. i guess it is always good, you migration. it's just three items and always remind me to talk rather everything else comprehensive is than not but what do you make of moved to the side. those overtures between the two country. >> well i think it's a good

first stretch and the olympics provides them a cover. if you can add merit-based. the north did not want to seem they were bowing to any >> i don't know who's going to argue with merit raise. pressure. they said let's talk about the olympics. the south koreans and the trump administration have not been on >> do you really think that the same page about how to deal there can be agreement on all with this problem. so this gives them a way to about? to get it passed in time? begin to talk to the north. the other thing that happened i want to ask mr. mccarthy a was, we postponed the military question. do you really think the exercises that we normally have agreement on most difficult at this time till after the subjects you raise in time can olympics and that of course has been one of the sticking points get sub 10 past and effective? in the negotiations. from what i understand the >> you have heard from leader united states may send a high-level delegation including mcconnell and speaker ryan who said they will put the bill onto vice president pence to the the floor if the president agrees to it and us getting to olympics, and this would furnish another occasion for them to be the rim, i haven't seen it be this close and have this able to talk and if it doesn't discussion in quite a few years, go any place, i think that china and russia will be more willing so yes, we can make this to keep enforcing the sanctions happening. because we can say, well, look, we all know it. we've done it before. we tried your way and it didn't we have probably one of the most

difficult things to do in work. let's go back to the other california water. we can get there and we can keep playbook. neil: secretary, i'm wondering if the north koreans are playing working each day on this. us like a fiddle here? we have to keep our fingers crossed and hope all goes well. >> i think what we are all saying is we'll adduce daca and the south koreans are not just being delayed here. will start comprehensive immigration reform the following because we can't do any joint afternoon. we'll take an hour off and then military exercise until after we will start. i do believe that. the olympics, and you know, that once we get daca done, if it's provides enormous opportunities done properly with security and for the north koreans? >> we, the exercises really are everything else, if it is done more symbolic than anything. properly, we have taken a big chunk of comprehensive out of we have 30,000 troops there. the negotiation and i don't think it's going to be that we have got the seventh fleet complicated. over in japan. so that is not the issue but, it >> we have to be very clear. sends a signal that they like, in my opinion will be back or in you know, that helps. five years, 30 years, whatever. remember, going back, when we the chain migration is so broke our relations with china, insidious. it's the fundamental flaw in the right after, they got a nuclear united states. and a conversation about daca is being held without that weapon and mao was making statementss that make kim sound consideration. i agree with border security as reasonable, ping-pong diplomacy well. if we think we are going to started it. divide one side for us the they invite ad ping-pong team we other, not not going to happen on this issue.

>> chain migration is taking a very big hit over the last six went one and will that work, we months. people see what happens. don't know. that will get us more support from our allies n fact the for instance, the men on the west side highway that killed president says he supports the the people up and they're so talks. neil: do you think, secretary, badly wounded. that if the president didn't it's incredible when they talk about wounded. they don't say arms are often take the position he has, you like softer one person lost two know, even down to tweeting about the size of his nuclear legs. eight died, but they don't talk button, et cetera, that, not about the 12 people that have no legs, no arms. only different that might have have been, if, it got us here? i'm talking about everybody. i really believe when you talk >> well there is no doubt about the fact that the united states about the subject we are all mentioning right now and they strong stance, including him, secretary mattis, secretary came in through him. tillerson and the sanctions, and that is the key thing, because the u.n. just like two weeks ago eight died, 10 to 12 are really passed much more stringent badly injured. sanctions. the south koreans intercepted a i really think a lot of people are going to agree with us now ship that would try to give them on that subject. oil, i think that also helps. neil: all right. >> 70% of americans have the where does this go? i mean obviously if the north is nuclear family.

sending athletes whether a large 70%. >> the chain migration is taking a very big hit in the last year with what is happening. contingent whether it's a cheering squad they call it, you're looking at these killers, whether you like or not and then unlikely they would do missile you see 18 people came in, 22 tests, right? >> right and we won't run any people, 30 people with this one exercises either. person that killed a lot of after the olympics do they go people. back to the nuclear program, do i don't believe there is a lot we go back to the exercises? of democrat supporting chain migration anymore. i really think the chinese and russians will be much more willing to put very stringent sanctions on them because we can >> should we have the homeland security secretary? say look, we tried your way, it >> i just want to make sure the didn't work. so this is what we got to do. reason of voter security is so important to have as part of >> secretary, thank you very, very much. this discussion is that it >> thanks for having me. doesn't solve the problem that neil: those overtures which the we can apprehend people, but we secretary alluded, among the can't remove them. reasons, not exclusively for the we need the loss assemblages some physical infrastructure of improvement in the dow today. but when it was announced not the president described, but we have to close those legal only would north korea send an athlete delegation and talks were continuing and promised to loopholes because the incredible address some of these other pull up for central america matters, a 70 -point gain continues to exacerbate the erupted into the 150 point gain problem.

border security has to be part you see now. of this or we will be here again in three, four, five years, and j&j and boeing among some of the bigger contributors here. you have intel's ceo while not maybe unfortunately sooner. the other point i would make if giving any apology for chip bugs the president asked the men and that the consumer electronics show, saying that the appetite women at vhs, what you need to for technology looks very, very do your job? they've entrusted to the security of our country, what is good this year, continuing what has been an uninterrupted run it that you need? the list do you wear provided is for technology stocks in general, from last year. what you need. we'll have more after this. if not less then, not more then. it's what we need to close the loopholes to protect our country. i would just encourage everyone much more eloquently than i can to describe the reasons why we are committed to helping the daca population, but to truly solve the problem it's got to be in connection with border security. >> those of us with comprehensive reform, that was six, seven months of every night negotiating, staff on weekends and a lot of things we're talking about on border security

and the interior things have trade-offs and we made those during that process. before march 5th. >> phase one which is daca and security and phase two which is comprehensive immigration and i think we should go right to it. we do want and we then do the today we're out here to test people's knowledge about other. type 2 diabetes. >> i think it is important to thank you for flexibility in so you have type 2 diabetes? yes i do. true or false... your leadership. i think what all of us have to type 2 diabetes more than doubles your chance of dying do is have the same willingness to add a little bit of from a cardiovascular event, like a heart attack or a stroke. that can't be true, can it? flexibility in to get this issue actually, it is true. done. obviously, i want to do a lot more than that. and with heart disease, your risk is even higher. the urgent thing now, for in fact, cardiovascular disease is the #1 cause of death for obvious reasons are these young men and women we have to deal adults with type 2 diabetes and heart disease. with first and foremost. but there is good news. jardiance is the only type 2 diabetes pill there are two issues we keep hearing that everybody agrees with a lifesaving cardiovascular benefit. to. that is dealing with these jardiance is proven to both significantly reduce individuals on a permanent real the chance of dying from a cardiovascular event

solution and border security. in adults who have type 2 diabetes and heart disease so, i don't see why we shouldn't and lower your a1c. be able to do that and i'm that's good to know. jardiance can cause serious side effects including dehydration. hoping that would lead us to senator cotten's point of a lot this may cause you to feel dizzy, faint, or lightheaded, of lack of trust. or weak upon standing. ketoacidosis is a serious side effect that may be fatal. if we get real border security and deal with these individuals, symptoms include nausea, vomiting, stomach pain, we can get that done, then i tiredness, and trouble breathing. stop taking jardiance and call your doctor right away if you think my gosh, it all up and up have symptoms of ketoacidosis or an allergic reaction. to do a lot more things in the future for the american people. symptoms of an allergic reaction include rash, swelling, and difficulty breathing or swallowing. >> what secretary nielsen has do not take jardiance if you are on dialysis said, it's so important when you talk about border security, if or have severe kidney problems. other side effects are sudden kidney problems, genital yeast you apprehend somebody at the border, but you cannot send them infections, increased bad cholesterol, and urinary tract back outside the united states, they are unlawfully present in infections, which may be serious. taking jardiance with a sulfonylurea or insulin the united states coming of not solve the problem because they release to the interior of the may cause low blood sugar. tell your doctor about all the medicines you take country and the problem persists and if you have any medical conditions. in that sends a message back to where they come from. isn't it time to talk to your doctor about jardiance? absolutely. >> you know what, we are going ask your doctor about jardiance. to negotiate that out. a lot of people agree on both and get to the heart of what matters. sides. >> thank you, mr. president. i recorded my good friend that

if we focus on daca and border security, we will get this. chain migration or the other issues will be lucked out. again, i said this with all due respect for democrat, republicans, being from the border i get a kick out of people go down and spend a few hours or and they think they know the border better than some of us there because we've lived there all of our lives. let me explain this. for example, if you look at the latest dea and you're worried about drugs, look at the latest dea report, more drugs come through the ports of entry and in between ports. >> i'm just saying, some of us have been working longer than other folks. number one, if you look at the 11, 12 undocumented which is the second phase, 40% of them came to them came through these estates. you can put the most beautiful wall, it will not stop them

because they will either come by plane, boat or vehicle itself. so the other thing that we have to look at, the wall itself, mr. president, you talk to your border patrol chief for the former border patrol cheats. i back then, how much time does the wall by you? they will say a couple minutes every few seconds. i wrote and border patrol cheats except that. >> not mine. >> they say without the while we ♪ cannot have border security. neil: all right. to avoid a shutdown in 10 days all you have to do is ask how about another short-term spending measure to get us over israel. the hump? if that sound a little odd to you, that is latest thing they're kicking around on >> homeland appropriations come your cheapest fare in the former chiefs have all said that. capitol hill. the issues are two onerous to get a full two year extension to the other thing, this is keep government lights on that long. to congressman dave bratt, thank where -- mr. president, if you look at where the walls around you for taking the time. right now, this is where the >> you bet, neil. neil: what are we looking at activity is for the walls are at right now. another here, another short-term

measure and how long would the >> the miles of area where short term be? people are pouring through. >> the good news the house is one of the good things because working together doing pretty of our rhetoric and the good team ball. we voted with a cr with all perceived -- my perceived attitude, fewer people are republican votes. that is a big new improvement. trying to come through. that is a great thing. the american people are rightly frustrated, why can't you guys get it done, the answer is, the therefore, our numbers have been fantastic, maybe for all the american people gave the right reasons. republicans the house and senate >> let me finish. and white house but to pass a budget you need eight democrat i want to ask you, do it you saw votes in the senate. and so there is, we're willing to compromise. the game last night. we have compromised all over the it was a good game last night. place. but the democrats want more than we are playing defense on the one-yard line called the u.s. compromise. they want their agenda when we border. we spent over $18 billion a won both houses and white house. and so, the system is a little year. if we think about playing defense on the 20-yard line, if dysfunctional. the senate makes it very hard to you look at what mexico has done pass stuff. so we'll probably end up doing come and they stop thousands of people on the southern border another cr into march. then paul ryan to his credit then guatemala. promised to deal with the talk >> we stopped them. today issue but we have a very good bill coming out of you know why? mexico told me, the president goodlatte, labrador in the told me, everybody tells me not house, and mccaul. people can look at that that is as many people are coming a pretty good framework. through the southern border ending chain migration, because they don't think they can get through our southern e-verify, end the visa lottery, border and therefore they don't

come. as it happens of mexico. internal enforcement. we did mexico a tremendous that is a big hang-up on the democrat side but a compromise favor. is in play there but the rough the point is we always give everybody -- every other nation numbers on daca are 800,000. gets money but us. we are always looking for money then you multiply it by chain. but we get the money to other you end up with three million just due to daca. nations. >> instead of playing defense, last year, we allowed if you look we know where the 1.8 million, according to the latest study, 1.8 million came hotel's iraq. in legal and illegal. that is five million people you're talking about, when the unemployment rate sound good, why stopped -- why play defense but only good because some in the one-yard line? people left the workforce. so that is the part where the >> we go after them like never american people know something's still up, right? before. we need to get everybody off the >> we can work the other things separately on border security, welfare programs, there are listen to the folks on the poverty traps embedded in there, back in the workforce and the border. >> you folks are going to have to come up with a solution and daca piece has to be handled if you do i will find a solution. we have a lot of smart people in this room, really smart people. separately. eight billion people want to come in, american people are a lot of good people, big hearts you want to get it done. generous, come on in, that is huge problem we have down the almost everybody, i can think of line. neil: you would be open to one or two i don't particularly

address the daca thing as the like, but that's okay. president seems to intimated, congressman as stand-alone issue [laughter] as you get on to the wait at everybody -- everybody wants a thisser issues in the budget, would you be disappointed he solution. does daca with democrats or you want it, henry. i think we have a great group of something like a wall or people to sit down and get this something to address you know, these other issues like the done. i think when the media leaves, which should be pretty soon, but immigration lottery system and all the rest? what if it is just something on i will tell you, i like opening daca and he goes back to the other stuff? up to the media because they >> no. that would be absolutely think they see more than devastating, right? neil: there would be no anything else that we are all on a similar page and i think we republican votes, certainly conservative votes for that? can really get something done. >> the president promised he so why don't we ask the media to doesn't want to do that. he wants to end chain migration. leave. it's a numbers problem. we appreciate you being here. you have five million people coming in. chain helps settle and even the numbers problem but then you still have the green light and magnet of eight million people [inaudible conversations] want to come in. neil: would democrats sign on to >> no. we need the wall. something at the same time addresses the daca stuff, i will tell you the ice officers doesn't address change migration or lottery stuff, right? >> right. in the border patrol agent say

well that is what they're sying but that is the deal, right? if you don't have the law, to get the numbers at parity you have to have a deal. certain areas obviously are the democrats just want their protected by nature. if you don't have the law, you side when republicans own the government. so that is not going to fly. cannot have security. just won't happen. the best way to lose the republican party this year is to part of the problem we have is not keep our promises. walls that we currently have are that is one of the biggest in very bad shape. they are broken. issues president trump ran on. we have to get them rebuilt. even bernie ran on economic aspect that the wage rates for average person have been flat you speak to the agents and i for 30 to 40 years. spoke to all of them. that was a bernie all the way through trump. i lived with them. the folks in midwest states, they endorsed me for president, which they had never done michigan, pennsylvania, they're before, the border patrol agents looking for goodwill. and i.c.e. so we're doing tax cuts. they never did that before. welfare reform will help get i had a great relationship people out of poverty traps, database et cetera, without the bring them back into the workforce. that is good news. wall, security doesn't work. importing five million new people to displace american workers that is not a solution. that doesn't mean to does the everybody knows it. mouse ball. and we will be devastated if we we just don't need that because go down that road. of mountains and rivers. neil: is there going to be a shutdown? >> no. but we need a certain portion of i think we're going to do another cr. the border. that will put us probably into if we go now but you can never have security. march. we'll keep the trains running but it is not good. you can never stop that portion because we passed in the house

of drugs that comes through that all 12 aprops bills. area. they come through planes a lot freedom caucus went along with of other ways. a lot of it comes through the those. played good team ball. southern border. leadership is doing it and senate is the problem. amnesty bills oaf there, durbin and lindsey graham bill is horrendous. they want to trade two million [inaudible] >> no commie clean dock daca for 50,000. just end the visa lottery, it sounds neat. that is not parity. bill to me is 800,000 people. two million increase and 50,000 fix, that is not a fix. that is devastating, terrible policy. neil: but as you said, the 41 years old, but they are also senate is a different beast. they have to pick up eight, now 16 years old. nine democrats, right? to me, a clean bill is a bill of >> we ought to make them run every two years. maybe that would solve the daca we take care of them and we problem. neil: very good having you also take care of security. again. >> you bet, thanks, neil. neil: president will weigh in on the democrats want security, this any moment. meeting at the white house with too. we started off with anything we all the top republicans and want security. democrats, 20 in all. senators and representatives. everybody wants security. he seemingly intimated he is and then we can go to comprehensive later on and maybe open to dealing with daca separately. maybe moving on to a short-term at the longer subject in a bigger subject and we can get resolution keeping government that done but we would get it going for another month or so done at a later date.

for more serious stuff. kind of like a diet. more after this. ♪ >> the united states senate right now -- what i'm hearing around the table right now is the commitment to the situation even if you're healthy. because there's advanced pneumococcal pneumonia is a potentially serious bacterial lung disease emergency. the $18 billion for a while -- that in severe cases can lead to hospitalization. it may hit quickly, without warning, causing you to miss out on the things you enjoy most. [inaudible] >> i can build it for less, by prevnar 13® is not a treatment for pneumococcal pneumonia... the way. somebody said $42 billion. it's a vaccine you can get to help protect against it. prevnar 13® is approved for adults to help prevent the aircraft carrier started out at 1.5 billion is now infections from 13 strains of the bacteria that cause $18 billion. no, we can do it for less. pneumococcal pneumonia. we can do a great job come a you should not receive prevnar 13® if you have had a severe allergic reaction to the vaccine or its ingredients. great while i am not getting if you have a weakened immune system, involved. i like to build under budget. you may have a lower response to the vaccine. the most common side effects were pain, i like to go under budget, head of schedule. redness and swelling at the injection site, i heard the other day, please limited arm movement, fatigue, headache, don't do that to me. muscle pain, joint pain, less appetite, vomiting, fever, chills, and rash.

help protect yourself against pneumococcal pneumonia. we can build a wall in one year and we can build it for much ask your doctor or pharmacist about prevnar 13®. less money than what they're talking about. any excess funds, whether it built under budget and i build ahead of schedule. there is no reason to ever mention seven years again, please. i heard that, i wanted to come out with a major news conference yesterday. no, it can go up quickly, effectively and we can fix a lot of the areas right now that are really satisfactory if we renovate those walls. >> how many miles of walls you were contemplating whether at 17 million -- >> we are negotiating up right now. or larger is where you don't need a wall because you do not in any river and you don't need it. [inaudible] >> it seems to me not much is actually changed here. the >> no, it's changed. my positions are going to be what the people in this room,

put. i'm very much reliant on the people in this room. i know that people on both sides have a lot of risk back to the people on both sides and what i approve is going to be very much reliant on what the people in this room come to me with. i have great confidence. if they come to me with things i'm not in love with, i'm going to do it because i respect them. thank you all very much. a lot of fine. another very well very well. i did one of her shows. her last week she had donald trump in my family was very nice. i like oprah. i don't think she is going to run. i know her very well. [inaudible] >> i think it will be phase two.

comprehensive the following day. >> thank you all very much. i hope we get enough material. this should cover you for about two weeks. [laughter] >> key witness something remarkable. i don't ever remember a room or in a room in the white house that went on for quite a time when michael wolf's book out that it's ripped out that it's ripped the president for being inattentive, unfocused and repeating himself in less than 10 minute lives. this was a fairly remarkable exchange of ideas from prominent democrats, prominent republicans , sometimes getting a little heated with each other on daca and the 800,000 illegals in this country, some of them

getting here when they were just babies and something has to be done. but this aggressive back-and-forth shows us another side of the president and maybe a behind-the-scenes look on how they say that sausage is made. not too nastily, not too ♪ neil: all right. forget the regular markets here. tech again proving to be the big sloppily, if i can use the word here, but with a book that is catalyst that drives everything out there portrays him, whatever and you can see it and feel it at the consumer electronics show going on. liz claman joins us what they your view of the president in call the ces with a look at the the process and whatever your views now the deterioration new odd technology. shows that it's possible that hey, liz. >> neil, as 5000 exhibitors opening up theirwares and this the free exchange of ideas. i'm a little bit of a nerd for consumer electronics, it is these things and i put both parties out on things that look pouring rain in vegas, they childish and petulant. haven't seen rain in 117 days. but this was remarkable. this is what we are capable of doing when you can sit around a edison is a bluetooth table, bat around ideas. one of the things that came speakering. through clearly is the president there are tarps all over and trashcans everywhere. we understand, some of our openness to separately address competitors sets are getting daca and go on to get a longer-term budget deal just to

dripped on, so you know, it happens. get that deal done. neil, are you boxers or briefs believe me, a lot of issues in guy? before you answer that, i want to show you these? the way prior. this certainly flies in the face of an author who's in the stent smart underwear. i know you're waiting to come up with something, just wait. the president is one step short of being in the book. they are smart underwear made by a company called myant and skin, just some thoughts now from the editor-in-chief of cues that cut skiin. these are cyber bockers. independent women's forum. what do they do? i am a nerd, but i love this. track and monitor, determine all of your bio data. what does that mean? what did you think? it can tell you, neil, your body >> you and me both, neil. fat and tell you your heart i thought it was fascinating, rate. what it does measure through the refreshing and encouraging for americans who got to watch not electrodes, your state of arousal, get your mind out of just president trump, but lawmakers to both sides of the the gutter please, arousal for aisle, lawmakers from congress talking about ideas that affect them means stress level. what it will do, track all of this. the lives of american people they are machine washable. could do so much better than the come in packs of seven with two gossip of the day in washington electrodes. they are wireless. you can wash them. d.c. and hopefully what comes they will not electrocute you from this discussion is some type of bipartisan agreement, anything like that. isn't this fascinating? smart underwear. some bipartisan deal. i would be good for president really are you going to wear this quite comfortable here, tram. the question is will democrats with the little electrode as you have the same possibility is see down here. but you know, i'm sorry, i can't offering here?

>> it's interesting the model the female underwear but president, the one who signed they are making it. this can keep the cameras hi, alexa. >> how are you? rolling. it was almost as if, not a one >> let's see it. of a thought that might not even we'll reveal. they do make this for women. be true, i like the way this is ah-ha. okay. so here's the, here is the going. i want the media to see this. electrode for the smart underwear. and it is like cyborg underwear. >> that was one of president that is cute. trumps pain. very cute. now neil, you get to answer the question, boxers or brief. the comprehensive immigration reform shows the flexibility that i do think we'll put them some defense is that you've got can bring you back these to a deal here. monitor body fat. neil: you are quite right. neil: charles payne was saying i'm open to whatever you guys are roping two. that. don't they have watches that monitor this. i'll put my high knee on the >> the reason they came up with line for this. watches and smart bands are so whether deliberate or just for bulky. you don't want to wear that on the set. wear this, it will even monitor show, it was an indication your heart rate. neil: that is good to know. despite this being that i'm going to be all over the map, liz, thank you. you will be live from there for i'm showing them quite pragmatic on this. your big show, right? >> yeah. we have governor rick snyder >> also a very different tone than in 2017 with health care

from michigan. and tax cuts which were a this is important. partisan fight. this has become a defacto auto here he is showing would need to show that beats out the detroit get a bipartisan budget deal and auto show. they all come here because now also transportation and he needs the connected car is so democrats. important. michigan is motor city, detroit. this is a significant shift in the term president v. we'll talk to him about that neil: when i look at stuff like we'll also talk with jim baxter this, how long does it last. of samsung. we already demonstrated the thrill ride for samsung. virtual reality, augmented republicans and democrats alike outlining differences in their reality. substantial on this issue. samsung, we'll break the news, there are some who want to do right on fox business at 3:00 p.m., is hering here in the something and wrap it all up in a package whether it's u.s. hundreds of workers. frontloaded in separate are not we'll tell you where, what they in others who say they want to will make. tie it to other things, that is see you at 3:00 p.m. eastern on hardly resolve. claman countdown. neil: look forward to that liz, thank you very, very much. what is interesting here is the two sides willingness, with the technology is certainly the tune of these markets but you know, cameras rolling, to talk it out apple is noticeably not at this. and not act like children. >> that is right. amazon and google are touting their stuff here. senator graham actually and apple's speaker, deirdre, is mentioned this, but on both sides of the aisle there a more extreme factions will make any delayed, right? >> it is delayed. bipartisanship a struggle. we want to point out from this ai, artificial intelligence senator graham mentioned you point of view, amazon was there have the resistance movement, a lot of people on the left who first, right, with echo or echo let's face it, the democrats

dot? made energy in 2018 is going to any variation of the product, be to continue to run against amazon got to the land of the president trump. smart home speaker. they will point to him you can ask it any questions. personally come to use agenda against him, but also run ask about the weather. against the same guy that ran google then caught up, if you against and 2016. like, with google home. we have to remember apple for any democrat to cross the aisle to join the resume trump actually owns real estate which back in the day companies like another republicans, they'll samsung kind of made fun of them. you're such a tech shop yet you make the president look good come is seen as aiding and will have physicians -- physical abetting the president within their party has very serious store where people pick up differences. that's the choice before things? apple said, yep. democrats. it paid off quite big. will they put good policy and bipartisanship ahead of their i'm not sure apple needs to be campaign strategy for 2018 and there to the same extent other will they be anti-trump at every competitors do. before liz was telling us about turn. digital underwear, i thought neil: as if it really matters to this one iteration of amazon people, but my point was then fashion forward, echo look will is, he's better than not. he has some good business and be a big hit. you get a 3d scan, which i negotiating skills. they were on display there and thought was intrusive. now that i heard about digital underwear, that seems like child it is calculated on his part, pay. the stats part to keep the tape rolling and see a site of your friends weigh in on your president they normally do not. outfit to see if you're fashion >> shrewd move. republican leaders on capitol

hill who are worried about forward. neil: markets are up. leaving the house and the senate technology is a big reason why. make that president trump and >> technology is doing want to see a lot more going extraordinarily well. liz mentioned cars. forward. neil: well put. i want to thank you does. nvidia's stock soared, spiked you've been treated to a 45 big-time deals, self-driving cars, baidu, with whole lot of minute lesson in what is possible when they all get companies around the world. together on a cabinet table and make the sausage. it is right place to be but i would say apple in my mind is you've got an inkling of it. sort of lagging here. our democratic congressman john even though amazon has echo slash alexa, apple was expected delaney does see bipartisanship on a host of issues including to dominate with siri. they debuted siri relatively infrastructure. sir, very good to have you. what did you think of that? early with a lot of buzz. were you are, it's hard to see. it was remarkable. people buying things on echo are spending more money but spending >> that was a very constructive less time on the physical phone. conversation and you see a real neil: hang on to that thought. we'll finally dip into the pow roadmap there is a comprehensive wow with the president at the white house with top republicans and democrats. immigration reform bill for the >> you don't need a wall because you have a mountain and a river, you have a violent river, you people pathway to citizenship, don't need it, okay? more border security is, i skills, low skills with

[shouts questions] >> seems to me not much actually significant in the senate. changed here in terms of your positions? >> no, i think it has changed. without any question that they would've come up for a vote. my positions will be what the it never came up for a vote. people in this room come up with. i am very much reliant on the people in this room. i know most of the people on both sides. i have a lot of respect for people on both sides and my, what i approve is going to be i couldn't see who they all very much reliant on what the were. that's what they want to do, we people in this room come to me do daca out and mr. comprehensive immigration with. i have great confidence -- if they come to me with things i am reform. neil: by the way, to your point that's exactly the ones who were i am not in love with, i will do it because i respect them. dared. the dick durbin in the steny >> you beat oprah, by the way? hoyer is the route they will >> oprah would be a lot of fun. i know her very well. take. and they say it's another i did one of her last shows. short-term spending measure, but donald trump before politics, when you think of that? her last week. she had donald trump and my family. it was very nice. i like oprah. i don't think she is going to >> daca is very easy to fix the run. [shouting questions] >> i don't think she is going to run. i know her very well. situation. the daca program is working compass which was was shut off >> thank you, mr. president. if you will. [shutting questions] do a cake and a little bit of

time. i think everyone is happy. >> phase two. daca is a bipartisan program -- comprehensive will be phase two. i think, i really agree with dick. i think we get one thing done. neil: and then you put the we go into comprehensive system burden back on congress. the following day. i think it will happen. even barack obama wasn't keen on >> thank you. solving it as he had to do with an executive order go around >> just wait one second. thank you all, very much. than he would have preferred and hope at the time he did it to i hope we gave you enough have congress sort this out. material. this should cover you for about two weeks. [laughter] neil: as i predicted it would go >> again, you would do daca and on about a minute. get to comprehensive immigration and, despite how long they were talking in there because it went reform. it was bipartisan on for a very long time, we got minute, minute 1/2. two quick takeaways, not worried about oprah. he runs for president he thinks neil: what it might be as we cobeat her but he doesn't will handle some rain. it's not beautiful, with the envision that happening. doesn't think it would be an issue regardless. on this budget thing he is confident they can carve out something on this whole proviso being something on the immigration mess, daca, what border or watching it chain of have you, go on to more serious stuff. migration. would you be open to that? the problem with going on to

more serious stuff it is another short-term spending measure. >> the devil is in the details >> it is another short-term depending how you look at it and spending measure. you heard him making very quick comments to your point on infrastructure. then dealing with comprehensive we talked about this as a part immigration reform is a phase that could be bipartisan. two, like what was said in the meeting. i'm open to that, just like i'm we'll see what happens in the new year if everybody will turn open to working with republicans on infrastructure, which also over a new leaf but that takes has the opportunity for a money as does building a wall. bipartisan deal. there is an idea to attach daca we have to start by working with any effort. to these issues. neil: i am looking at dick understand the truth. durbin on the other side. on a bipartisan basis. steny hoyer, number two ranking house democrat, that will be a tough sell. >> it will be a tough sell but train to come back and say you're quite right. let's face it, immigration will >> i agree with you. be tied to daca. the low-hanging fruit is smart that's an enduring problem. immigration. who would be against a candidate neil: you're exactly right. this might've been the start of adopting something similar to something. that harder point a for thank you are wading through that and taking the time. >> my pleasure, neil. conservatives on the republican side how to pay for the wall. neil: i don't know if this is what kind of amnesty would be kind of things to come or if i'm presented so that the base, too worked up with the cameras donald trump's core voting base is not too upset. but you know -- running and people acting friendly when they forget the fact the cameras are running,

neil: but -- >> it is washington, d.c., it what you witnessed for some 45 doesn't have the votes. if it is realistic he will get a last-minute is how they do it wall any kind he will have to give up something in concern. when they really want to do >> i like what you said about something. they are not evil. canada, toronto, vancouver, you don't want the hb 1 visa they are not just the bees, each side willing to listen to the candidates, tech immigrants, other side, come up with probably build or contribute something. this is what it's all about. businesses. canada you don't want them, he can still be done. oddly enough, shepherded along we'll take them. they can build their business here. >> yeah. neil: thank you very much. by the united states, branded in i regret you didn't weigh in more on the smart underwear. a book in that case. >> president trump gave me three segments for tonight. he didn't look like a nutcase to i appreciate it. >> gave me enough material. neil: i haven't even touched on me. the smart underwear thing. meantime look at the markets. look what is going on here. look at the optimism about these tax cuts especially when you have big brokerage chiefs and the like, saying you know what? this party roars on. does it, after this.

neil: i want to see something on the dow up 150 pounds before we got the cabinet meeting with prominent democrats and republicans. 12 republicans, eight democrats, the who's who with the dow up more than 103rd teen, 105th in points. up now better than 150. is this extraordinary exchange anything to do with.com exclusively the first deposit neil: apparently there was longer version. this is it. president, cabinet room talking that. about, well everything. let's listen in. it comes at a time when they've >> make statements. gotten so cynical on both sides don't mind the statements. about the prospect of talking or we want this as very open forum. i will say though that i really getting any thing done. do believe that democrat and i'm speechless. it's not just because of my bad republican, the people sitting cold and i don't want you to feel sorry for me, but i've got around this table want to get something done in good faith. a very bad cold. i want to get to read from i think we're on our way to do

it this is idea i had last week. presidential historian, julian i was sitting with some of our melcher and regular politics great republican senators and we contributor angela morvillo. all agreed on everything. angela, i am just amazed that david, right? , we had a great meeting. tom? when they lambasted the we would like to get some democrats. what do they say? president incapable of talking i say, let's have the same to each other and totally meeting but let's add the democrats. disinterested in negotiating and that is what we've done. with each other we were quite i think we'll come up with an the opposite. answer. i hope we come up with an answer what did you think? for daca. that we go further than that >> president trump gave all of us a far proceed to watching later on down the road. this man a work with real dick, perhaps you would like to say a few words. >> thanks, mr. president. progress with the famous for inviting us. dealmaker acts out an actual we're honored to be part of this deal. no one really does that. i mean, when was the last time conversation. sent the 5th, you challenged we got to see the proverbial congress. sausage get made in washington? you said we end daca. replace it. as of today we have not done this is a positive step that we place a deadline of president trump is taken in one march 5th which you created with your elimination of daca. repeat. neil: of course we hear a lot of we know that in the meantime this stuff go on behind the there have been efforts scenes. underway. senator graham and i sat down ronald reagan i'm not like with a bipartisan group of senators. we worked long and hard, many hours we put into it.

and we feel that we can put together a combination of future commandos two. with those two sides then and of daca as well as border now. it is interesting now, wasn't security. that there are elements you will find democrats support when it it? comes to border security. >> he was giving the uncivil environment in washington. we want a safe border in in the past, brendan johnson talked frequently. america, period. both when it comes to the issues you had franklin roosevelt met of illegal migration but also when it comes to drugs and all with the opposition especially during world war ii. these other areas. now i will say that there is a this is common to have those kinds of discussions, and that sense of urgency felt by many of this one is recorded. us when it comes to this issue. it is at a time when the parties many people are losing protection of daca on daily are so polarized that this was a basis, as of march 5th, 1000 refreshing sign of willingness a day will lose daca protection. 900 are members of the u.s. where the two sides get military. 20,000 of them are school together. >> you know, i've always likened teachers in my state of illinois it, julian, we live in an age of and city of chicago, there are professional wrestling. we become almost, and the typed characters are everyone on the 25 in medical school can't apply for residency if they lose the daca status. left is coalesced and you know, lives are hanging in the inherently evil. balance. we have got the time to do it. the president and everyone in a manner of days, literally around them bumbling, stumbling,

of days we can come together to forgetful, can't think in more than five or 10 minute increment reach an agreement. when that happens, i think good and yet we see something like things will happen in other this that belies all that. places. we'll see come progress here in >> you know, large part of this washington. >> i agree with that dick. is dreamers are a bipartisan i very much agree with that. issue. if you look at a cnn poll in tom, would you like to say something? tom cotton. >> thank you for everybody being december, 83% of americans support it, even the majority of here. glad to be here with democrats and house members. supported. in this issue there is lack of trust has been for many years. neil: 63%. >> pretty remarkable figure. lack of trust between republicans and democrats. a lack of trust among this is one issue where there is potential for a bipartisan republicans. most fundamentally a being la of trust between the american people and our elected leaders. agreement. you hit snags when you move on to broader immigration. i don't think this is an issue i'm on not delivering a solution of getting on the same people for many, many years on some of discussing. these problems. i hope this meeting can be the these are ideological differences and i may be a bit more pessimistic on that. beginning of building trust between our parties, between the i have to cringe at the idea of chambers because i know for a bringing back earmarks. fact all the republicans around the table are committed to trade you that came out of finding a solution and i believe nowhere. i know what he meant by that. all the democrats are as well. so i think this is a first good the means of getting deals done, step for a good bill, i'll get something to you if you mr. president, that will achieve vote for this and i always said the objectives thaw stated. it was the way for the inning to

providing legal protection for lead to a lot worse than a gnat about that thing. the can population, insuring our what did you think of that? he might getting rid of earmarks border and ending chain was a good way to cut porkbarrel migration. thank you. >> mr. president, thanks very spending. much for having us down here. thus far he's been all about rolling back regulations and cutting red tape. i agree with tom cotton that the for him to say let's bring back american public are very frustrated with us. one of the reasons they're frustrated with us because we earmarks was definitely something that i hope does not pan out. continue to couple things which neil: i have my concerns about that. i know what he meant. we have large agreement with part of it is but everyone will things on which we do not agree. this is a perfect example of >> well i think it was that. 86% of the american people in remarkable that president trump most recent poll are for said that, one of his major insuring, as you have said, not in-part opponents within the republican party is jeff flake. who is one of the leading senators against earmarks. providing not providing so president trump doesn't want to be on the wrong side of his base be yielding to the daca-protected kids going to a sentiment that we should have place they don't know, they're more earmarks. not growing up in and not their neil: guys, i want to thank you all. i apologize for all these home.

they are americans. they don't have a piece of paper breaking news developments. that says they're americans but you stayed a little long on the they're americans. seems to me, mr. president, that white house spray. i stayed long because for if we move ahead in constructive republicans and democrats there is a way to get stuff done. way, take that on which we you don't have to curse each agree, the american public will be pleased with all of us if we other. you don't have to shout at each do that. other, don't have to say just as in september you recall, ungodly, nasty things on left or we did the extension of the cr, the right. there is a way to move the ball no drama. we were all for it. forward without being a complete and total ass. this just proved it. this is a promising development. you, four leaders, met we came we'll see. trish regan. trish: that is interesting. like we were a fly on the wall seeing how the whole sausage get to agreement, passed the cr in my view we can pass the s made. not as adversarial as you think. protection in the, what i shows a lot of promise. understand your position is, neil, thank you. procedurally it was not done president sitting down with both sides, republican and democratic correctly. you then as dick has said lawmakers working on a challenged us, pass it bipartisan solution to fix our correctly. if it is put on the floor, broken immigration system. mr. president, i believe it will he will work on a daca solution, have the overwhelming majority in both the house and calling it a bill of love. senator graham thinks it will i'm trish regan. have substantial majority in the welcome, everyone, to "the

united states senate as well. intelligence report" this is that i think is the first step very rare look we got inside of the president's meeting with a tom, to creating some degree of bipartisan group of lawmakers. th competence. democrats are for security at the borders. i want to state that emphatically. there is not a democrat that is not for having secure borders. there are obviously differences, however, mr. president, how you affect that you just indicated that yourself. and you indicated this would be a first step and then we continue to talk as we're talking today about how we best secure the border. there are differences of opinion within your party and within our party. so i would urge that we move forward on protecting the daca-protected individuals. young people, young adults, as you pointed out in one of your statements who are productive parts of our community, that we protect them, and get that done, and then because i think

everybody around the table, as you pointed out is for security, and then the issue will be, how do we best affect that border security. would i urge us to move as senator durbin has urged us to move on the daca students. as a matter of fact, the speaker i think today, but maybe yesterday, said, we need to solve the daca issue and we need to solve it in a way that is permanent, not temporary. and i agree with him on that issue. >> interestingly, when you say that president obama, when he signed the executive order actually said he doesn't have the right to do this. so you do have to go through congress. you do have to make it permanent. whether he does or doesn't, assume he doesn't, he said it, and he decided as a temporary stopgap. i think we want to have a permanent solution to this. i think everybody in this room feels that way and very strongly. >> one thing is the senate passed the immigration bill as you know. we did not consider it in the

house we did not reach those issues. mr. mccall, chairman of the committee reported out a unanimous security solution, which we then included in the bill, that we filed on comprehensive immigration reform. >> i also think after we do daca, and i really believe we should be able to be successful, i think she looked in terms of your permanent solution and the whole situation with immigration. i think a lot of people in this grim agreed that also, but we will do it in steps. let's do this and then we go faced through. kevin, what would you like to say? first time in thank you for bringing everyone together. the senate come in the house, both parties. i like the exchange of ideas. everybody has a point here. the one thing i don't want to have happen here is what i saw in the past. there were four bills passed on border security years ago that

never got finished. the immigration bill passed right back at the table with the same problem. let's make a commitment to each one and most importantly to the american people that when we get done and come to an agreement that we are not back at this problem three, four years from now. that is why we've got to do with daca and i agree 100%. if we do not do something with security in the chain migration, we are fooling each other that we solve the problem. you know how difficult this issue is, so let's collect leigh cobble together a number the first one to tell you we all have to give a little bit and i'll be the first one willing to. but solve the problem and not tell the american public at the end it is solved when it's not. >> a good starting point would be bob goodlatte who has done a bill and i understand you are ready to submit it and take that

annual submit and negotiate in congress and the houston and the house and when it goes senate don't negotiate. both republican and democrat. if anyone has an idea different than that. starting in the house might be good. i think you're ready to go. i would like to add the words merit into any bill that is submitted because they think we should have merit-based immigration like they have in canada and australia so we have people coming in and have a great track record as opposed to what we are doing now, to be honest with you. merit-based should be absolutely added to many bill even if it has to do with daca. the american public area much wants that. bob, where are you with the bill? >> tomorrow, senator mccall and congresswoman sally and congressman labrador are the chairmen of two subcommittees will introduce a bill that

addresses the daca concerns. let me thank you, mr. president. i was an immigration lawyer before a selected senator. on the thank you both were campaigning on her borders and the interior of our country, but also on addressing daca in a way that makes sense. don't do it ad hoc. you challenged us and we should step up to that challenge and we will do it in a bipartisan fashion, but we have to put our best foot forward and we are going to do that with this legislation. it is going to address daca in a permanent way, not a temporary short-term gain. we are going to address the border enforcement and security and the wall. we are going to address interior enforcement, but not everything the administration had on its list. we are going to address the chain migration. we are going to end the visa lottery program.

we are going to address the sanctuary cities and we think it is a good bill that will address the two things are speaker told us after you've made your decision, which is we have to address the problem with the daca kids being in limbo as dick durbin described and i agree with that. but we also have make sure this does not happen. >> and the democrats will have a lot of things -- i just felt this was something long overdue. you'd have a meeting and say this is what we want and this has been going on for years. at a certain point, maybe i'll just lock the doors and i won't let anyoneborder secured for ses