charles: sheriff, thank you very much. i've got to break in with some news. the house voted to fund the government through march 23rd. they're going to kick the can down the road. it still has to go through the senate and it's going to be a little tougher. in the meantime, here's lou. lou: good evening, i'm david asman in for lou to bees. democrats are playing dirty tricks with their memo rebutting allegations of fbi and department of justice corruption. president trump right now is considering whether to release the democratic memo but a source telling fox news that the ten-page document is loaded with sensitive information, including sources and methods. that was apparently done intentionally to force president trump to either deny the release of the memo or significantly redact it so that democrats could cry foul. we're going to take up the partisan games with one of the congressmen who led the effort to release the gop memo,

congressman matt gates joins us. also tonight, president trump doubling down on his demands for more border security. the president today telling the reporter he's ready to shut down the government if congress don't work quickly to close loopholes that allow m s-13 gangs to cross the border. >> if we don't change the legislation, if we don't get rid of the loopholes where killers are able to come into our country and kill, gang members, there are many gang members that we don't mention, if we don't change it, let's have a shutdown and it's worth it for our country. i'd love to see a shutdown. >> we will have a full report from capitol hill and discuss the chances of a shutdown with congressman diane blake. and a major turn around on wall street. the dow surging 400 points a day after posting its biggest drop on record point wides.

we'll take that up tonight. the top story, president trump is being briefed on the democratic rebuttal to a bombshell republican intel report released last week exposing corruption at the highest levels of the doj and the fbi. now the white house is deciding whether or not to release a full or edited copy of the democratic memo. intel committee ranking member adam schiff is already claiming he fears politically motivated redactions. but a source telling fox news the democrats' memo could be a trap. it's riddled with sensitive information so the president may have no choice but to alter or block part of it. intel committee chairman devin nunez says the document is a partisan ploy. >> part of the reason we know we're right is because of the relintels attacks on me, trey gowdy. they go as far in their memo to attack us in their memo. what did they say for ten days.

they said our memo came to all sorts of conclusions. our memo just lists facts and their memo, they actually come to conclusions. >> president trump now has until friday to release or block the democratic memo. well the house voting moments ago to approve a temporary spending measure to avert a government shutdown. but the bill's future in the senate is very uncertain. fox news chief congressional correspondent mike e i manual e on capitol hill. >> the democrats continue to hold funding for our government hostage on an unrelated issue. they're voting on a fifth continued resolution to fund the government to march 23rd, extending funding for a number of medicare pieces, including commute health centers. >> it's time now to focus on meeting these essential services, particularly health care and health care services

that are a lifeline for our people. >> the win over defense hawks and conservatives, this includes increased funding for the military through the end of the fiscal year. that brought the conservative house freedom caucus on board. >> we're going to vote for the right thing and the right thing is what we're voting on today. they think it's more important to give amnesty to other folks or whatever reason they come up with, we think that's wrong. >> chuck schumer holding out for more domestic spending. today the armed services committee got an earful from the secretary of defense warning frequent continuing resolutions and the existing budget caps are causing the american military advantage to shrink. >> the combination of rapidly changing technology, the negative impact on military readiness resulting from the longest, continuous stretch of combat in our nation's history and insufficient funding have created an overstretched and

underresourced military. >> that may help with efforts to get a new long term funding agreement with more money for the military and domestic priorities, nearly $300 billion more for the next two years which could get tuck into a short term extension. >> i'm optimistic that we'll be able to reach an agreement. >> i've discussed the outlines with my caucus that i think we're happy with and hopefully the republicans are. and then we can get something really good done. >> a budget caps deal would make many feel better about voting for a fifth temporary government extension. but more spending could create new headaches for gop leaders when it comes time to raise the debt ceiling in the coming weeks. the house just did its job, the vote was 245-182. >> and i see that 17 democrats actually voted in favor, voted with the republicans on the spending gap measure. is it conceivable that any

democrats in the senate might vote for it as well? >> that's one thing we're looking for if chuck schumer keeps his troops together. all focus will shift to the spending caps agreement to see if that would be enough to break the logjam and get this through the senate and then back to the house to approve and then become law. >> good stuff. mike, good to see you my friend. thank you. here to talk about the fight to avoid a government shutdown and the dueling intel memos, congressman matt gates who serves on judiciary, budget and armed services. let's taweast talk about the democratic memo. adam schiff has been around intel enough to know what you can include and what you cannot include. apparently he put enough sensitive information in this democrat memo that some of it is going to have to be redacted. now he's saying if anything is

redacted, in is censorship. talk about a ploy. >> and you're right. i'm tired of adam schiff and other democrats playing games with our intelligence and the processes that we have to rely on for meaningful investigations. here you've got a circumstance where clearly the democrats have chalked this memo full of sources and methods that would hurt the american people if they were exposed. and so of course the president is going to have to redact some of that information. but i don't know how adam schiff has any credibility left with the american people. remember, david, when he told us that the release of the nunez memo would discloses all sources and methods. that's a lie. he accused nunez of unethical conduct. devin nunez was cleared. and schiff made the accusation that we changed the memo before giving it to president trump. he's not making that argument anywhere. time and again he's proven incredible. we've got to move pass the

partisanship. david: good luck. the fact is that every republican, correct me if i'm wrong, every republican on that committee voted to release the democratic memo. they voted with their democratic colleague to release the memo. at the same time every single democrat voted against releasing the republican memo. how do you find bipartisan in that? >> it's difficult. but it shows that we're confident in the facts that are laid out in devin nunez's memo. quite frankly cash was co convertible into a fisa warrant to spy on americans. that's outrageous. and democrats and republicans are going to be in power in the future in this country and i don't either side to have the ability to use political document to go and affect an intelligence investigation. we should all be in this together but unfortunately the democrats want to drive division instead of working together. david: there's another problem here, which is the fisa judges.

shouldn't they have known -- isn't some of the responsibility on their heads or his head or her head, whoever, because they should have demanded from the fbi knowing that steele's sources were not named, they should have demanded from the fbi some due diligence on the fbi's part to track down who steele's sources were for the trump dossier. they didn't do that. they just gave it boom the stamp of approval. >> they didn't have all of the facts. and that's where i believe laws were broken. i believe that material omissions were included in the presentations to the court. and it's important that the american people know -- david: forgive me for interrupting. isn't it up to the judge to say you don't have the facts? i'm not going to give you approval until you get the facts. >> here's an example of something they wouldn't know. how would a judge in a fisa court know that the fbi had terminated christopher steele, had fired him and refused to pay

him because they deemed him incredible after he was leaking to the media. that happened. the fbi and the department justice knew it happened and they went and sought renewals before judges without telling them. there may have been some circumstances where there could have been a more thorough review but there was clear evidence of concealment of the fact that christopher steele who wrote the dossier was deemed incredible by the people writing, while donald trump was the president of the united states. david: it's far too easy to spy on americans regardless of who's in power. we have to straighten out the prejudice. that cannot be allowed in justice or the fbi. but also the fisa judges have to be looked at. very quickly, congressman, you passed this stopgap measure, the spending measure which would lengthen a little bit, satisfy some of the demands of the military that you can't have these short two-week spending programs.

do you think the senate, there's any chance for it to pass in the senate? >> here's the question for the senate. will they liberate our military from the partisanship and brinksmanship of washington. i fear they won't. i'm concerned about that. but this is the senate's chance. let's take our troops, fund them, give them what they need to train and prepare and fight and win downrange and then we can fight about the rest of the stuff after. i think we should put our troops first and i wish we had a willing partner in the senate but i'm not optimistic. david: you did have 17 democrats that voted with the majority to pass this thing. we'll see. matt gates, thank you for being here. we appreciate it. we're coming right back with much more. please stay with us. president trump warning dems that he's willing to shut down the government if the border isn't secured. >> ms-13 recruits through our broken immigration system violating our borders. i will tell you, i would shut it down over this issue if we don't straighten out our

border, we don't have a country. >> we take up the president's battle to protect our borders with ed rollins. and the administration reassuring investors following a wild ride for the markets. >> they're functioning very well and we continue to believe in the long term impact of the stock market. >> we'll have a full report on where wall street finished when we come back.

it's time for the 'ultimate sleep number event'

on the only bed that adjusts on both sides to your ideal comfort your sleep number setting. and snoring? does your bed do that? right now during the ultimate sleep number event, our queen c2 mattress with adjustable comfort on both sides is only $699, save $200.

ends soon. visit sleepnumber.com for a store near you. david: president trump telling lawmakers today that he's prepared to shut down the government if congress doesn't pass border security measures. take a listen. >> if we don't change the legislation, if we don't get rid of these loopholes where killers are allowed to come into our country and continue to kill, gang members, and we're just talking about ms-13. there are many gang members that we don't mention. if we don't change it, let's have a shutdown. we'll do a shutdown and it's worth it for our country. i'd love to see a shutdown. david: i think he said shutdown three times, maybe four. ed rollins joins me now, a fox business political analyst. ed, it would take a nonpolitician to say something like that. politician is always calculating what's going to help me here. if i say i'm in favor of a

shutdown, that's going to kill me politically. but he said it's better to have a shutdown than to have these thugs come into the country. >> he's taught republicans how to fight and he's not about to walk away from this issue. he feels very strongly that we need border security. but the vast americans don't realize there's a war going on along the mexican border. thousands of people are being killed there. the gangs have come across, all over this country, there's thousands of them and he feels very strongly about it. david: i'm sure he does. we're going to talk more about the ms-13. politicians have an inflated ego concerning what they do inside the beltway that somehow americans are going to fall apart if they think there's a partial government shutdown. americans can do very well without most -- without some of the government operating. >> i think the critical thing is he has to go to the country telling them why he's doing it. i think he will do everything he can to make sure it doesn't

happen but if it happens, he's not going to walk away from it. he wants the border security. he talked about it during the campaign and he's going to get it one way or the other and this may be the way. david: and you think of a couple of times, 2013 there was a government shutdown blamed on the republicans. you can argue about that but that's how the media spun it. and yet in 2014, a year later, they did very well in the elections. also the markets by the way. we should mention the markets don't give a damn about a government shutdown. in fact sometimes they do better if there's a government shutdown because they do less spending. >> to a certain extent the country doesn't feel that the government is working very well any way. my sense is he's going get what he wants and they've got to understand that. david: the m-13, they have a heinous group. i consider them to be the taliban of the united states. they are absolutely vicious. the president cannot overstate their viciousness. but the democrats put themselves out on the line last week when he mentioned them specifically,

pointed to the gallery and said these folks have lost family members in a brutal fashion because of m-13. democrats sat on their most of that and came out afterwards and were talking about the president was exaggerating the importance of the m-13. there are thousands of these vicious monsters in this country right now because of our immigration laws. i think the democrats overplayed their hand in terms of going against the president. >> i do too. they're not just dealing drugs. these are murderers. they go out and the they're killing people left and right. they have no qualms about life. they're young, tough and they have stopped. and you can't let more additions come -- and it's not just here. it's everywhere. but you got to stop it here. david: and the democrats spent rare political capital, i mean they spent time, their own political capital putting their own reputations on the line being able to judge what is dangerous and what is not. and again it reinforces the idea

that this president not only is helping the economy but it's keeping the americans safer than the democrats would. >> i would argue with any democrat that in this particular instance their behavior towards those parents who lost their children was very disheartening to those people out there who have been victims or the people that worry about the system. david: it was not the finest moment for the democratic party. that's for certain. thank you very much. be sure to vote in tonight's poll. do you believe the dems intel memo is just a ploy to distract from the growing corruption at the fbi and doj? follow lou on twitter at low to bees, like him on facebook and follow him on instagram. on wall street stocks rebounding in a very hem thy way for the biggest selloff in six years during a volatile trading season. the dow ending up 567 points, the s&p up 46 and the nasdaq up

148 points. volume on the big board the heaviest in over a year at 5.8 billion shares. the dow trading at a range of 1200 points today. the second biggest range in history. changing direction 29 times before closing higher. the will shire 5,000 measuring at half a trillion dollars. the dow is up nearly 36% since trump's election, the s&p up 26% and the nasdaq up 37%. and a reminder to listen to lou's reports three times a day coast to coast on the salem radio network. coming up next, special counsel robert mueller wants a sitdown interview with president trump and the white house attorneys think this could be a perjury trap. we'll take that up with fox news legal analyst greg jarrett straight ahead. oi

. david: new reports today that president trump's attorneys have advised him against sitting down for an interview with robert mueller. fox news confirmed last month whether the president's attorneys are questioning whether mueller has met the legal standard to press for an interview. the lawyers making a case that there is no subject or line of inquiry that hasn't already been answered over the year. joining me now, fox news legal analyst, greg jarrett. it seems clear that the president's advisers are saying don't sit down with this guy. are they right? >> to an extent they're right. it's a sound legitimate argument to say a couple of things. you can get the information elsewhere, number one. and number two, why should the president sit down and answer questions about matters that do not constitute crimes. collusion is not a crime. and neither is firing james comey, which is authorized under the constitution the president is entitled to do it.

now, mueller would disagree with that. and if he were to slap the president with a grand jury subpoena, then you've got a problem. i'm not sure that mueller has the appetite for a court fight with a federal judge. david: why not? >> it would take a long time. and mueller might decide, you know, i do stand a small chance of losing, let's negotiate a deal. let's make a deal. and that's what bill clinton did. and so i think that's the strategy behind that. the deal would be limit the scope of the questioning to only certain few matters and that would be a success for the president. david: bill clinton ended up getting impeached. >> he did because he ended up lying when he was questioned. david: that's the problem with saying you're going to limit the scope. you never -- mueller has interviewed dozen and dozens of people, acquaintances of trump's, who knows how long ago

acquaintances of trump's. he's got all of his stuff and he's probably compared that to what donald trump has said on the public record thinking with gee, donald trump said this which is not true compared to the other information i've got. he's got all of these lines of questioning in order to create a perjury trap. >> a perjury trap and obstruction trap. it's always unwise, and i used to always tell me clients when i was a defense attorney, don't talk to the prosecution. keep your mouth shut. only talk to me. because in my experience prosecutors don't care about fair and justice, they care about indictments and convictions. that's my experience. and i don't trust robert mueller and i especially don't trust andrew wiseman and the rest of the team of partisans. david: i got to switch gears. this is a subject you and i both care a lot about, the fbi, its future. we know that there was political bias that came in at the highest levels at the fbi we want to stop that from happening.

there's nothing worse than our justice system being tainted by political bias. on the other hand, we don't want to critically injury the fbi. it's a vital institution in our democracy. you have friends and associates in the fib. whafbi.what do they say? >> i've talked to four or five additionals in the last couple of days and they all agree that the credibility and trust of the fbi has been ruined but not ruined by this investigation by the intel committee and others, but by comey and mccabe and strzok and baker and the whole gang that appeared to have gone out of their way to clear hillary clinton and frame donald trump and did so, in my judgment, in violation of the law for political reasons. and all of these guys i talked to, formerly fbi are disgusted with what comey, mccabe and the others did. david: there's finality to the word "ruined."

is there any way they see to turn this around? >> it will take time. under j. edgar hoover the credibility and the trust for the fbi was damaged terribly and it took decades for that to be fixed and resurrected. it's going to take a long time. the damage tacomy did and others is so severe that i don't blame americans for not having trust. and it's too bad because the rank and file fbi, great people. david: absolutely. and the president has said that. goodo see you. ank you very mh.uc space x today lauhing t world's mos powerful rocket. take a look. it is called the falcon, the falcon heavy to be precise, and it's on its maiden flight taking off from kennedy space center. it's designed to carry up to 141,000 pounds by the payload this time was a red tesla

roadster. that's expected to orbit the sun for millions of year. imagine. space x also landed two of the rocket's side boosters at cape e canaveral. that was a success. we're coming back with more. stay with us. desperate dems trying to distract as the real russia scandal emerges. >> i think there's clear evidence of collusion, that the democratic party and the chill clint campaign colluded with the russians. >> we take up dueling memos with congressman diane black. and the brave jumpers taking a leap of faith from the seventh tallest tower in the world. we'll show you the performance from the world famous malaysian tower next.

. david: i'm david, in for low lou dobbs. we're seeing shocking hypocrisy from the democrats. ranking intel democrat adam schiff blasted the memo as a danger to national security. but back in 2013 he said the fisa court needed to be, and i'm quoting here, much more transparent so that the american people can understand what is being done in their name and in the name of national security. joining me now is republican representative diane black of tennessee, a member of the house budget and ways and means committee. representative black is also running for governor of the volunteer state. best of luck in that venture,

representative. but let's first talk about this memo and the fact that now representative schiff is against coming out with the underlying information. of course we would advise it all being redacted if it's sensitive stuff that could compromise the intel. but he doesn't want to release any of the stuff that would indicate what the fisa committee was basing its recommendation on with regard to the application, whether or not it was based on the trump dossier. what do you think? >> well, it's awfully strange now that he's changed his story. i'm so glad that the nunez memo did come out because it did show and allow the people of the country to see the transparency about what was really happening. look, it's really disappointing that all of this was occurring. what it does is it causes the american people to say that they can't trust our intelligence agencies and our fbi. and i think that's such a shame. because we know that the fbi, the men and the women that work there are good people and it's just a shame that this has

occurred the way it has. but the american people deserve transparency. they deserve a chance to know what's going on. >> and frankly i think they understand what's going on for the most part. for example, a trump trap, what we heard about today where adam schiff knew he was putting into the memo stuff that would have to be redacted. he knows intel very well, what should and should not be allowed. and sense it is probably going to be redacted he will then shout censorship on the part of trump or republicans in congress. >> i did have a chance to read that document. i made sure that i read both of them. although i'm not on the intelligence committee, i did have several concerns. and one of my concerns was where there was a fighting, how i could tell whether that citing was correct or not. i did spend quite a bit of time in the room asking the questions of the staff. and it's pretty obvious that that have citings that are not exactly what really went on. david: representative, you were very interested in what happens to the budget of the united

states. you heard the president earlier today say he would love to see a government shutdown if it prevented more m-13 members and other bad people from coming into the country as a result of not dealing with immigration in the new budget deal. do you feel the same? >> i don't think a government shutdown is ever really the best thing for the american people. i think that we can get to the conclusion of where we need to be. look, daca is something that we have all said we want to deal with. now the democrats are trying to use that to do everything they can do make the republicans look like we're not effective. but we're going to get to this and i don't think the government shutdown really is the way to go. we do need to deal with daca but first we need to deal with the things that cause daca in the first place. that is securing our borders, the visa lottery and the chain migration. and then we can talk about the young people who came to this country through no fault of

their own but with their parents bringing them here. david: assuming we can get beyond daca, the question of the budget -- the democrats continue to say the only thing that's going to make them happy for the long term budget deal is it if includes all of this extra spending. like the government has been doing a wonderful job in the past spending money, there's no abuse, no fraud, there's no waste in government spending. and when you think of something like medicaid, which if you become governor you're going to have to be dealing with your state. it's bankrupting a lot of states, the amount of money that the states have to spend on medicaid. and you think of the fraud. money is just -- more money is not the answer, is it? >> no, it is not. and as a former budget chair -- and people know this last year when we did the budget it was the most conservative budget we did in 20 years because we recognize you cannot continue the spending more than what you bring in every year and piling up the debt and deficits. for me whatever i can do as a governor as the state of tennessee just to take block

grants, be able to get the federal government out of my way, i can take care of what needs to be taken care of. but this overspending is something we've become addicted to in washington and it must stop. david: i'm with the president. i would rather see a government shutdown and some of this abuse of the budget that's being done. and the markets really are quite satisfied when there's a shutdown. they actually do pretty well because they think the folks inside the beltway aren't going to be able to do any more damage. best of luck to you? your race for governor. come back and see us. >> thank you. david: be sure to vote in tonight's poll. do you believe the dems' intel memo is just a ploy to distract from the growing scandal of construction at the doj and fbi? cast your vote on twitter watch as a group of thriel seekers leap off of the kl tower in malaysia. they perform incredible

heart-stopping flips as they plunge to the ground. the this is the seventh tallest building in the world standing over 1300 feet tall. coming up next, attorney general sessions speaking out amid growing concerns about a politicized fbi justice department. former deputy assistant attorney general tom dupree joining me with his reaction and more coming up next. liberty mutual stood with me

. david: attorney general jeff sessions says the fbi needs a quote fresh start after two years of constant controversies and scandal ps new reuters poll showing the uphill battle. 73% of republicans now believe members of the fbi and department of justice are working to delegitimize trump through politically motivated investigations. joining me now, tom dupree, former deputy assistant attorney general under george w. bush. good to see you, tom. when you were at the justice department, did it have political overtones? did you see political bias make its way into the way that the organization was run? >> you know, i didn't. and in fact, all of this has been somewhat of a surprise to me. when i was there and i think it's still true today, 99.9% of

doj and fbi employees are nonpartisan, by the book law and order types. when i saw the poll num numbersi was heart sick the republican party has been a support are of law enforcement. that was a republican brand. that's one of the reasons i'm a republican. i'm a strong supporter of the nation's law enforcement. david: the flip side of that is true as well. most people in the department of justice and certainly in the fbi do tend to be more conservative than liberal. it's just that more -- i think most bureaucrats, people who were there, who have a more political orientation or who have done nothing but work for the government their whole life have a tendency to be lib rap. liberal. it's the appointees who become permanent bureaucrats that are a focus of attention. >> i believe it's the political appointees that in many ways are responsible for driving this

perception. when i served in the justice department i would spend time trying to persuade my lib wall friends that law enforcement is nonpartisan, neutral, serious people. now i'm trying to persuade my conservative friends of the same thing. i think you put your finger on it. i think a lot of the reason we are where we are today is because of the actions of some political appointees. i do think it's a narrow band. i don't think the problem is endemic throughout law enforcement in the united states. and i'm hardened to see that the new leadership of doj and fbi is taki tnghis serusly and mmitted to reverng the trend. david: there are members of the military, some generals become generals because of their hard earned medals in combat. some generals frankly go up the rank because they know how to kiss butt better. i hate to be crude but that's way it works in a lot of ways. including the military. and so it depends on the type of person. but what we have seen -- let's

focus on the memo. what we've seen from the republican memo makes it ax absolutely clear. is there any shadow of a doubt that the fbi and doj were politicized? >> well, let me say this. when you read the nunez memo there's no question that the charges it makes are extremely serious. when you're accusing our law enforcement officials of essentially misleading a federal judge, that's about as serious as it gets in fairness i was supportive in the release of the democrats' supportive memo david: every republican voted to release it. >> from my perspective, the critical question here is to put everything in context. i think the republican memo, it made a very strong case. but as any prosecutor will tell you, you don't want to render a final judgment until you've heard the other side. david: you don't want to render a final judgment until you've seen the evidence and of course

that's the thing that the fisa court didn't demand from the fbi when they saw about the trump dossier. they didn't demand the underlying evidence that steele and the others who kree crated e report didn't offer in the dossier itself. that was inexcusable on the part of the fisa judge. >> to my mind, the critical question is it's not so much the giving of information that had a political taint. the question is whether there was sufficient and adequate disclosure of the origin of that material. look -- david: there wasn't. >> -- tainted all of the time. witnesses cannot be credible. they might have biases, motives. all sorts of things. judges can deal with if they're made aware of it. the critical question, what did this judge know and what was he or she presented with. david: right now the american people are the judge. we are the judge of the fbi, the justice department and the fisa court. we deserve to see the evidence. it's that simple. no? >> i agree with one caveat.

the caveat is national security and i don't want to compromise sources intelligence method. david: well that can be redacted. >> it may be redacted. and i suspect that the democrats' memo is going to have to be heavy redacted for that reason. but subject to that qualification i agree. full transparency is the best way to go. david: thank you very much coming up next, president trump threatening a government shut down. we'll take up the looming deadline with our panel and democrat adam shu schiff duped by russians. we have the tape. stay tuned for this. blp

tes ..

david: in our online poll we asked you, do you believe an

investigation of the state department could find just as much corruption as the fbi and the doj? justin trudeau corrected students' language at a university town hall event. maternal love is the love that will change the future of mankind. >> we like to say people kind, not necessarily people kind, it's more inclusive. david: joining me is rachel campos-duffy. aren't you glad trudeau was there to explain? >> he ignored her question so he could vish to you signal.

he sent a love letter tweet when castro died that was so embarrassing. he's such a jerk. dave around and i are so surprised this story hasn't gained more attention. adam schiff was punked by russians in an extraordinary fashion. these russians who called him up under false pretense claiming they had naked pictures of donald trump. he spent 7 minutes with these people. let me play for the audience just a piece -- these are russian punk sisters talking to a member of the house of the representatives. >> she got compromising materials on trump after their

short relations. >> what's the nature of the prom pro mice >> there are pictures of naked trump >> putin was aware of the ability of the con no mietsed material. >> yes. >> okay, we'll be back in touch with you through our staff to make arrangements to obtain these materials for our commit tee average the fbi. i appreciate you reaching out to us. david: this is a democratic member of congress working with russians to get information that's false against a political opponent. >> nobody loves donald trump more than me, but who is looking for naked pictures of him? david: anything salacious is like catnip to these people. >> while he's investigating

trump for a meeting with a nobody lawyer. david: this was a 7-minute conversation adam schiff had with these people. thank goodness they came forward. and said it's phoney and fake by the shows how vulnerable they are. >> adam schiff says i night was a spring call and i'd called the fbi. but there are emails between his staffer saying when can we meet at the ukrainian embassy to get the information and collect all this stuff. he is -- what does trump call him, little adam schiff. he's a hack. he's doing exactly what he accused the trump campaign of. david: they have the nerve of

accusing trump junior to go to a meeting to get compromising information on a political opponent. >> it shows you the skill of this guy that two russian teenagers fooled him. david: daca, is there going to be a deal with daca? it was an illegal measure by president trump taking the power he didn't have away from congress to make a deal on immigration. >> it's the best deal the dreamers have ever had. the democrats are convincing them not to go for this deal because they are so trying to take down president trump. david: will there be a deal?

>> no. >> the resistance is too powerful. david: thank you very much. that's it for us tonight. charlie hurt and sebastian gorka are among our guests tomorrow. good night from new york. kennedy kennedy: another speech brings another excuse. hillary clinton blaming misogyny for her 2016 election loss. i will ask dennis miller if giving out free beer at the super bowl parade is the