use to your advantage. this is for investor has cash and not-veried of the. [closing bell rings] liz: the dow is up for three straight days. that is the longest winning streak since is february 26th. that will do it for the "claman countdown." it is friday tomorrow. see you then. >> stocks rallying for the third straight day. look at the chart. the dow closing higher by 238 points. first three days of gains in the dow. all three major averages. with today's big gains, the dow and s&p are closer to positive territory for the year. the nasdaq is already. i'm lea gabrielle in for melissa francis. david: good to have you here. david asman. this is "after the bell." for more on today's, we have one, two, three, four, five in the red. look at big number. 238.

gerri willis that is a big gain. >> the s&p 500 is up 18 points. the nasdaq, up 34 points. very good day indeed. let's work through some of the details. dow winners, we have boeing as you can see. dow, dupont, chevron, caterpillar and nike across the board. you see a lot of different kinds of companies participating in this. ii want to talk a little bit about technology here. stocks doing really well. even amazon today. there is a note out from an analyst, saying these companies, the googles of the world, amazons of the world, these companies are the ones too big to fail. remember when we talked about big banks being those companies. now they're saying it is big tech. that those are the companies that we all need to have going in right direction for economy to do well.

big day down here. other sector, energy, exxon, halliburton, schlumberger, all up 1% to 2%. 2 1/2%. that is because we're seeing escalation, oil inventory drawdowns are rising and escalation from the saudi conflict in yemen. people pretty upbeat, got to tell you. back to you guys. david: gerri willis thank you very much. let's bring in today's panel. kevin kelly, john petrides, and charlie hurt from "the washington times." he is also fox news contributor. john, first to you, in a bear market you start out strong and end the day slow. in a bull market you do it the other way around. we've been too accustomed over past couple weeks to a bear market scene, you start out strong, you end weak. looks like we turned the corner. we're going back into the bull market. you start out so-so you end up strong. >> this is investtores taking a step back realizing tariffs are

not that big to derail this global synchronized growth we're seeing in the economy. we have earnings around the corner. we have investors using opportunity to dip, to load up portfolio buy stocks on the cheap. david: charlie, one man has been responsible over the past couple days turning us around on trade. that is larry kudlow. >> could be sure. this fight that donald trump is sort of picking with china right now is a fight long-time coming. it is a, it is a big gamble obviously. it is kind of terrifying to look at, you know to watch what looks like, could be the beginning of some sort of a tit-for-tat trade war but there are real issues at the heart of this. they have been real issues everyone in washington has been trying to ignore or sweep under the rug for a very long time. donald trump ran a campaign he would confront this stuff and he is. and it is a bit of a bumpy ride. david: the question, kevin, how

you confront it. if the idea is it is the united states against the world, you have got a problem. that is when the markets get talil concerned. but what larry kudlow did yesterday, essentially bringing the wto, saying we're not going to act alone against china. we'll act through the wto, the world trade organization, in other words get the whole world against china rather than the u.s. against the whole world? >> yeah. i think you're bringing up a very salient point. one of the best ways to look at it in order to do business in china you have to give them 51% of your intellectual property, your trade secrets and all your business. david: not just the united states. it is germany. it is england, any other country in the world that tries to do business there. >> think about german automobile manufacturers, like the u.s. automobile manufacturers they have to give up 51% of their business over there. why do you think tpp happening? all the pacific countries were

having a big problem dealing with china. going through the wto is the best way. david: want to go to charlie inside the beltway. the bottom line that was a game-changer for wall street. when they saw it wasn't just donald trump against everybody else. that larry kudlow would try to use the united states as unifier, rather than a divider to get the world together against china, that was extraordinary strategy. >> larry kudlow is obviously a life-long free trader. he is very core in free trade. donald trump does too but donald trump also believes in fair trade and believes it is unfair, tilted to the advantage of china for a very long type. it was most, i would say the most important plank or at least one of the top three most important planks of his campaign. david: right. >> one of the things that donald trump had to bring larry kudlow along on, the idea you use tariffs as a cudgel as

weapon in order to deal with these other issues. david: in proposal stage. john, will we see some kind of a deal between the world and united states and china before these proposals become a reality. >> time will tell. going through the wto is a very positive signal. a little bit of political risk reduced in the market that trump seems to listen to one of his advisors and the proposals larry kudlow put forth which is positive message being sent to the market. >> all right. open for business, president trump touting tax cuts in a roundtable discussion in west virginia this afternoon. fox business's adam shapiro at white house with details. adam, we're hearing from people today, happy about money they're bringing back home. reporter: because of the tax bill that became law last year. we heard from employers as well as employees. one citizen became in sift is

sift. one woman had a broadband internet connection, a so her child could do her homework. the president talked about a great many things, including china and nafta. now when he talked about nafta investors on wall street seemed to like that. you saw the dow start to go up. what he said was that the negotiations with canada and mexico may soon be coming to an end. listen to the president talk about that. >> we're working very hard on nafta with mexico and canada. and you know, we'll have something, i think fairly soon and i told my people, this is like a story, i want it before we make a trip next week to peru. they said oh, let's have nafta. i said rush it. take it nice and easy. no rush, we get it done right or we'll terminate. reporter: there was the discussion about china. now of course we saw what larry kudlow said yesterday on the fox

business network as well as today about there being no trade war with china. that is something a lot of people are watching. what will happen, as david was pointing out with these proposed tariffs. here is what the president said. >> you have to go after the people that are not treating you right. in many respects i think we'll have a fantastic relationship long term with china but we have to get this straightened out. we have to have some balance. reporter: in regards to treating you right, the president seems to have a wee bit, i don't know, animositity toward senator joe manchin, who he doesn't think has treated people of west virginia right at all. this is clearly a senator manchin a democrat running for re-election, the president pointed out to the people in this event, manchin did not vote in favor of the tax reform bill. lea: he certainly did. thanks, adam. panel is pack to react. charlie, i want to start with you. president trump took a swing at

senator manchin. president trump made the point that not a single democrat voted for these tax cuts. what is the impact in the midterms? >> well this is the best thing the republicans have they can run on. too bad they don't also have a major border security package, a wall or something like that to run on but the tax cuts are a great thing to run on. you know, donald trump is like a dog with a bone. when he gets after somebody for not voting for something he will hit west virginia 10 more times. he is going to hit everyone of these states with democratic senator running in a state that donald trump won in 2016, and he is going to harass the living daylights out of these people and make it very uncomfortable for them. lea: people having more money in their pockets is certainly important when it comes to elections. john, i want to turn to you. the white house is wanting to make some tax cuts more permanent. wanting to simplify how taxes are filed. so where do you think this is going? what is the likely out come? donald trump and administration will continue to

pound the drum of fighting for the little people. i think that was his message, when he was on the campaign trail that he heard at the government had left them behind. he is out there fighting for the people why he keeps going back to the heart of the america and fighting for the little guy. lea: president, i want to talk to you about the president's comments on nafta. he covered a lot of ground. talked about basically saying u.s. is not in a rush on nafta. we'll get a good deal or no deal at all. what are the ramifications if that were to happen? >> they are pretty vast given nafta is over 25 years old and didn't exist when we have the internet give way to international commerce and international shipping. you have to consider how antiquated it is. we shouldn't rush this, if we scrap it, we scrap it to do other deals. we shouldn't be forced into the bad deals that are detrimental to us. we are starting to get growth from tax cuts that benefited

average everyday american people and small businesses. so i think this is a great way to do it. you have to be judicious how you take care of these deals. lea: the president says good deal or no deal. thank you, panel. david: facebook ceo mark zuckerberg getting ready to testify in front of the house energy and commerce committee next week as the company remains under fire for privacy issues. zuckerberg attempting to calm invest fears but doesn't seem to be enough? the vast majority of data facebook knows you chose to share it. it is not tracking. for some reason we haven't been able to kick this notion for years that people think we sell data to advertisers. we don't. david: here now, congressman marsha blackburn from tennessee. she will be questioning zuckerberg next week. what are you going it ask him? >> i want to know if he is willing to work with us to put privacy standards in place. we tried this. i have had the browser act. we've tried data security.

this has been a four-year process. david, i got to tell you, he is not wanted to come to the table. big tech has avoided that. one of the things that we know is that this is not a data breach. and it is not something that is, untypical or annexinged occurrence. this is business model for them. it is not a bug in the system. it is a feature that they sell and they data mine and they do sell that information to their advertisers. they're an advertising company. david: frankly congressman it was used before. only problem when it was used by the trump campaign or people working for the trump campaign. in 2012 why weren't there investigations back in 2012, when the obama people, obama reelect folks were bragging about having used facebook data? here is from one of the obama aides carol davidson, facebook was surprised we were able to

suck out the whole social grab. they didn't stop us once they realized that is what they were doing. they came in the offices days following the election recruiting and were very candid they allowed us to do things they wouldn't allow someone else to do because they were on our side. they have been doing it for years, only when they do it for the trump campaign they get in trouble. >> you're exactly right. we know big tech is some of the bigger funders of democrat campaigns. that is one of the open secrets if you will. we also know our constituents, i talked to tennesseans every day, that want to be able to protect their privacy online. and four years ago i chaired the privacy is working group. i co-chaired it with a democrat. we want ad data security bill. we wanted a privacy security bill. democrats would not work with us on this. my hope we pass the browser act with bipartisan support and we

can pass the data security bill with bipartisan support and give you the consumers, the ability to protect yourself online, your virtual you, that you can opt in. david: to a certain extent you have buyer beware here? >> yes. david: people put everything out there. they shouldn't be that surprised, should they, that advertisers and others, political or otherwise will use the data that is already out there, that was put freely out there by the consumer and they're going to put it together to sell whatever they want to sell? i mean why, the big surprise and how do you protect consumers from themselves? >> the way you protect consumers is to give them the opportunity to make that choice. just like in other business relationships. david: but they already have, congresswoman. forgive me for interrupting. you make the choice when you put yourself is out there in so much detail. >> you make that choice because you go through, you don't read

the laborious -- david: that is your fault, right? >> in the privacy agreements and then you see what is happening. most people i will tell you, david, are not aware intruce sieve nature of and the tracking being done on their data and on their usage. david: if they're not there, if they're not aware of that now, they have been buried in a well for the past month because we have so much information out there. >> they're waking up to this. consumers are waking up to what has been happening with their data. david: what i'm getting a the, congressman, very often congress' impulse is to do something, by doing something they can make things worse. i'm wondering if some of the regulations you might think about imposing might be harmful in the long run for the internet itself? >> we have always had privacy standards in the physical space. and what we have tried to do for

the past several years is to apply those to the virtual space. that is what we're continuing to do. it is not about regulating facebook or any of the other edge providers. social media providers. this is about giving individuals the tools in their tool box that they can make the choice, to either share their information or, to protect their information and also if there is a, some kind of intrusion or sharing a breach of some type, this gives proper notification to those individuals that have found their information shared against their will. david: we're going to be watching very carefully and closely. thank you so much for being here. marsha blackburn, appreciate it. >> yes. lea: we do have breaking news to tell you about. 5.3 magnitude earthquake striking southern california. the quake centered 35 miles southwest of the channel island

and 86 miles west of los angeles. the earthquake was reportedly felt for 10 seconds. there are no tsunami warnings issued. we'll monitor and bring you the latest headlines. david: california is screening as state emotions are running high as another california city sides with the trump administration about the sanctuary laws. where things go from here. >> nunez versus the fbi. the chairman of the house intel committee demanding the agency turn over the original document that led them to investigate the trump campaign. "judicial watch"'s chris farrell how this plays out. david: the president officially signing an order to send national guard troops to protect our southern border. the move getting sharp criticism from the left. attorney general ken paxton from texas sounds off neck. >> we will have strong borders. we started the wall and started building it. we can't let people enter our country, have no idea who they

are, what they do, where they came from. whoooo.

when it comes to travel, i sweat the details. late checkout... ...down-alternative pillows... ...and of course, price. tripadvisor helps you book a... ...hotel without breaking a sweat. because we now instantly... ...search over 200 booking sites ...to find you the lowest price... ...on the hotel you want. don't sweat your booking. tripadvisor. the latest reviews. the lowest prices. we're on the move. hey rick, all good? oh yeah, we're good. we're good. terminix. defenders of home.

weli can tell you about...re. streaming the most free tv shows and movies on the go. yeah, and... xfinity internet. it's so fast! and you can save by... by getting up to 5 mobile lines included. whoa, you're good. i'm just getting started. ♪ simple. easy. awesome. come see how you could save $400 or more a year with xfinity mobile. plus ask how to keep your current phone. visit your local xfinity store today.

lea: sending troops to the border. president trump will place the national guard across the southern border in an effort to prevent illegal immigration. homeland security secretary kirstjen nielsen defending the strategy. take a listen. >> my conversations with governors and members of congress over the last 48 hours, it is their strong belief it made a huge difference. in some cases it ended all of the illegal traffic. so i think we have good case studies that it works. lea: here now to react, ken paxton, texas attorney general. nice to see you. >> nice to see you. thanks for having me on. lea: thanks for being here. you are a hard-liner with

immigration. you voted against sanctuary cities. voted against in-state tuition and driver's licenses. this must be a music to your ears. >> this issue with texas is a border state. we have crime rate with illegals being here, 1200 murders last five or six years. this avenue affects our citizens. this is music to our ears. this will be helpful. lea: what will have to be addressed? "new york times" wrote an opinion piece, all it takes is one mistake. she reference ad 1997 incident when an 1-year-old american student were killed by u.s. marines during a drug mission. one shot fired, one mistake could really turn the page. what concerns do you have? >> you have to be careful. you always have to do your best. nothing operates inside of a vacuum perfectly. all you do entrust the best people you have, the national guard, our own people, customs enforcement.

we have border patrol. all we can do is have the best job. lea: how is this working? governors basically have to say yes, right? at this point we're waiting it hear back from governor jerry brown on his decision. >> i'm hopeful that he will participate. he suggested that he might. certainly our governor, governor abbott has said he supports this. i know he has done a great job in the past working on issues just is like this. i have every confidence at least in texas we can coordinate well with the national guard and everybody else that is on the border. lea: how much improvement do you think can be made with this decision? secretary nielsen this could essentially end all illegal traffic in the area. do you think that is realistic. >> i would say it would be dramatic improvement. one, once people know about this, it will act as deterrent. that will have dramatic impact just by itself. second of all, with the help, with our border patrol having

help, redeploy assets to the border. a lot of our border agents are inland. would be nice to have more border agents on the border stopping people from crossing. i doubt it will be zero. but i can say this. i think it will make a very significant difference. lea: the idea get border patrol agents closer to the border so servicemembers can do more support roles. thankthank you, ken paxton. have a great day. >> absolutely. you too. david: president trump hated the last budget but there is a way to pull back some of the spending that was just agreed to. "the wall street journal"'s kim strassel is here to tell us how it all works after short break. stay with us. >> things i'm unhappy about in this bill. there are a lot of things that we shouldn't have had in this bill. i will never sign another bill like this again. you made the mistake.

i beg your pardon? he says, you should have chosen full-car replacement. excuse me? let me be frank, he says: you picked the wrong insurance plan. 'no. i picked the wrong insurance company.' with liberty mutual new car replacement™, we'll replace the full value of your car plus depreciation. liberty stands with you™. liberty mutual insurance. when heartburn hits... fight back fast with tums smoothies.

it starts dissolving the instant it touches your tongue... and neutralizes stomach acid at the source. ♪ tum tum tum tum... smoothies... only from tums capdynamic lightingrs elevated comfort powerfully efficient and one more thing the world comes with it ♪you can go your own way... the 2019 jeep cherokee

>> if the president impound excess spending i think he just needs a majority vote in both houses to get that through. i think those are the rules. i will have to check that. the intention is great. the legislative -- we'll have to wait and see. david: larry kudlow on fbn this morning, talking about cutting the budget by impounding. this method was outlined by our next guest in her last "wall street journal" column. through impounding the trump and gone congressional gop can undo the worst of the omnibus spending bill. kim strassel, kim, people are listening from the top. larry kudlow doesn't sound very sure, lack of a better word be legal to use this method. can you give him assurance that it would be? >> oh, it absolutely is. this is a very simple and

elegant law passed in 1974 called the impoundment act. when the president is sent a spending bill, he signs it, but he can go back through, choose a package of anything he doesn't like, up to any amount, send it back to congress asking them to cut it. it can be brought up by very easy means. it is not subject to amendments. and congress can pass that with a simple majority vote, both in the house and in the senate. so you don't have to worry about a filibuster. david: already we've been hearing squealing, particularly from the democrats this wouldn't be fair, wouldn't be legal, et cetera. these are facts who have no problem breaking domestic spending caps. they're not supposed to be spending as much as they were spending in last bill. they're breaking the law on one hand and saying you can't break the law using impounding. >> this is not about breaking the law whatsoever. this is about using a legally-passed tool to go about cutting back on spending.

it's a power we reserve is to the president. congress does have to sign off on it which is why they have to vote as well. it is a watered down version of the line-item veto. for republican this is is important. if democrats will hold them hostage every time to get 60 votes for spending and use that to blow out the budget every time, this is the way to fight back and get those numbers back under control. david: you use the word fight back, there is question how hard the republican leadership is going to fight because they're going to have to twist some arms, even among republicans, there are moderate and liberal republicans that might want to spend as much as democrats are spending. can you get mitch mcconnell and the other leaders in congress to twist the arms that need to be twisted? >> look, david, there is an easy path for this. it starts in the house. this is the trick. remember the house, even though it gets beat up for not doing everything it should on the budget, the house actually did

pass all 12 of its spending bills last year. every member in there is on record of having passed those bills. now at those levels. they were everyone of them plussed up in the omni. as starting point and house leader kevin mccarthy is looking to this, go back to all the republicans, hey, this is the extra amount stuffed in during the omnibus process, we're on record on lower levels, the difference is $75 billion. david: wow. >> let's start there. maybe a few things we can all agree on beyond that as well. there is the starting point. you send it to the senate, you ask the senators is really not something that you can stand up to for your republican constituents you promised spending restraint. david: forgive me for interrupting, on left side of the screen, rain. you're looking at the president came back from west virginia.

he talked about the success of the tax cuts. a lot of people in the audience talked about their own experience with the tax cuts. a growing number of people learning to love the tax cuts. a lot of gop candidates, particularly for midterm elections coming up, seem to be if not running away from it, at least avoiding talking about it. why is that? >> i don't know because it is a win-win. you saw some of the polls when it first came out that suggested people weren't entirely on board. that has changed dramatically. this is rippling through the economy. not just in terms of paychecks and money people are taking home but bonuses coming out. companies adding to employment rolls. you're seeing it ripple through. i think republicans will embrace it more. it would be even better to get this recision impoundment victory, say not only did we cut your taxes, but we're keeping promises of keeping spending more in control of washington. david: we talked about larry kudlow at the beginning of this segment.

you know that nobody in the world loves tax cuts more than he does. he was instrumental in the reagan tax cuts in the '80s. he was talking about phase two of the tax cuts. do you think any chance that could be done before the election? >> i don't know. look, i think what you see right now a congress eager to complete its most pressing business, then get back home. that is what we see in the midterm elections because they want to be on the ground making their campaign pledges. look, i think it could be a big i victory were they to push something like this. given how successful these would be, turn back around, say to democrats, do you really want to let the personal income tax cuts expire at certain period of time? i think that would be a tough message for democrats to combat. put them in even more precarious position on this election season. david: kim strassel whose column will be out tomorrow.

you want to tease the column? >> no. you have to wait. david: that is the ultimate tease. kim strassel, thank you very much. appreciate it. good to see you. lea: here is another tease for you. a growing movement across california. the latest city to join the sanctuary city fight. what it could mean for the golden state moving forward. katrina pierson, trump 2020 senior advisor sounds off. >> if i could do it every person that is dreamer in this room could do it, every person undocumented in this room they could do it too. ♪ ♪go your own way copd tries to say, "go this way." i say, "i'll go my own way" with anoro. ♪go your own way once-daily anoro contains two medicines called bronchodilators, that work together to significantly improve lung function all day and all night. anoro is not for asthma . it contains a type of medicine

that increases risk of death in people with asthma. the risk is unknown in copd. anoro won't replace rescue inhalers for sudden symptoms and should not be used more than once a day. tell your doctor if you have a heart condition, high blood pressure, glaucoma, prostate, bladder, or urinary problems. these may worsen with anoro. call your doctor if you have worsened breathing, chest pain, mouth or tongue swelling, problems urinating, vision changes, or eye pain while taking anoro. ask your doctor about anoro. ♪go your own way get your first prescription free at anoro.com. if yor crohn's symptoms are holding you back, and your current treatment hasn't worked well enough, it may be time for a change. ask your doctor about entyvio, the only biologic developed and approved just for uc and crohn's. entyvio works at the site of inflammation in the gi tract and is clinically proven to help many patients achieve both symptom relief and remission.

infusion and serious allergic reactions can happen during or after treatment. entyvio may increase risk of infection, which can be serious. pml, a rare, serious, potentially fatal brain infection caused by a virus may be possible. this condition has not been reported with entyvio. tell your doctor if you have an infection, experience frequent infections or have flu-like symptoms or sores. liver problems can occur with entyvio. if your uc or crohn's treatment isn't working for you, ask your gastroenterologist about entyvio. entyvio. relief and remission within reach.

thisreally passionate about- i really want to help. i was on my way out of this life. there are patients out there that don't have a lot of time. finally, it was like the sun rose again and i was going to start fighting back now. when those patients come to me and say, "you saved my life...." my life was saved by a two week old targeted therapy drug. that's what really drives me to- to save lives. sometimes, they just drop in. obvious. cme group can help you navigate risks and capture opportunities. we enable you to reach global markets and drive forward with broader possibilities. cme group - how the world advances. ♪

david: we have breaking political news. fox news is confirming that tim pawlenty is running for governor for minnesota once again. paw lentty previously served two terms in this position, trying to flip a seat held by democrat incumbent mark dayton. we'll keep you updated. lea. lea: another california city taking a stand against the state's sanctuary law. escondido voting 4-1 to support the trump administration law suit. >> when you crossed our border you became illegal and you became a criminal. >> what american citizen are you willing to sacrifice to give sanctuary to an illegal alien? >> i came to this country 45 years ago with me and my mother. we were not offered sanctuary. we were told you have to be an american citizen, here is what you have to do. and we did it. lea: here now, katrina pierson,

trump 2020, senior campaign advisor. nice to see you. >> great to be here, thank you. lea: we want to put up map. escondido city council voted to join this lawsuit. this is the fifth california area to fight back against the law. eight other areas are considering action. katrina, these areas are down on the border really concerned, areas in san diego. >> that's right. lea: do you see this beginning of a anti-sanctuary movement across the state? >> absolutely, this is definitely just the beginning. you have a governor that has gone unchecked, the brown regime has been doing a lot of things that are hurting americans in the state of california. this is an interesting topic. this issue really projected president trump's candidacy across the country.

they are taking on the federal government in losing battle that ripple effect across the country that makes it good addressing sanctuary status. this gives opportunity for many people in live in the state of california felt like they didn't have a voice before, have the opportunity to be more engaged in the political process. governor brown now essentially issued an order telling law enforcement and local leaders to usurp federal law to put their own communities at risk. at some point this will be addressed. lea: california's attorney general xavier becerra threatened sheriff's office for possible arrest violating stat law. should local law enforcement fear retaliation? >> they should but i'm not sure that they do. i go think this is the beginning of a much larger movement across the state of california. when you have 135 how homeless people, many who are sleeping in

the streets you have an african-american population around 6%, 30% of the population is black. a lot of families wonder where their catch-and-release program is for their children? wondering where resources are going, when there are so many homeless people. this law pushes tax dollars to aid and abet criminals seeking sanctuary in the state. time for people in the california to rise up to fix the problem in the local government as well as the state government. >> i want to turn to this. more than a million illegal immigrants obtain ad california drivers license according to california dmv. where do you stand on that issue? there is a question of safety. you want people driving to get tested, have driver's licenses versus issue of should illegals have driver's licenses at all. >> you're not a citizen you

shouldn't have residence in the state and therefore not receiving a drivers license. that is smaller piece of the problem with states that do things like this. these are magnets. this is why people come across the border to take jobs from americans, to work at a cheaper wage. but this is also in-state tuition for illegal aliens this is also a state that gets free health care. again, you're talking about using tax dollars to benefit illegal aliens, many of whom are criminals, and this law protects them, puts citizens and legal residents at risk. that is why you see heat the exchanges in the public commentaries. this is the beginning. i brief it will spread like wildfire as it should. so many americans like myself from a border state of texas who will 100% behind them and support them. it is border states that get hit the hardest when it comes to illegal immigration. lea: certainly getting people up in arms. thank you, katrina.

david: you saw the immigrant at beginning pounding his fist saying look i came here legally 40 years ago. these people are getting all sorts of benefits they don't deserve because they're not citizens. lea: when you think about driving -- david: how many of those people use those to get voting registration? lea: double-edged toward. david: congressman devin nunez digging for more answer. he says the doj is refusing to give an unredacted copy of the infamous document that spawned the russian investigation. chris farrell from "judicial watch" is here in a moment. really helped me up my game. i had a coach. math. ooh. so, why don't traders have coaches? who says they don't? coach mcadoo! you know, at td ameritrade, we offer free access to coaches and a full education curriculum- just to help you improve your skills.

boom! mad skills. education to take your trading to the next level. only with td ameritrade. [fbi agent] you're a brave man, your testimony will save lives. mr. stevens? this is your new name. this is your new house. and a perfectly inconspicuous suv. you must become invisible. [hero] i'll take my chances. ♪ ♪ i can do more to lower my a1c. because my body can still make its own insulin. and i take trulicity once a week to activate my body to release it, like it's supposed to. trulicity is not insulin. it comes in a once-weekly, truly easy-to-use pen. and it works 24/7. trulicity is an injection to improve blood sugar in adults with type 2 diabetes

when used with diet and exercise. don't use it as the first medicine to treat diabetes, or if you have type 1 diabetes or diabetic ketoacidosis. don't take trulicity if you or your family have medullary thyroid cancer, you're allergic to trulicity, or have multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type 2. stop trulicity and call your doctor right away if you have symptoms of a serious allergic reaction, a lump or swelling in your neck, or severe stomach pain. serious side effects may include pancreatitis. taking trulicity with a sulfonylurea or insulin increases your low blood sugar risk. common side effects include nausea, diarrhea, vomiting, abdominal pain, and decreased appetite. these can lead to dehydration, which may worsen kidney problems. to help lower my a1c i choose trulicity to activate my within. ask your doctor about once-weekly trulicity.

david: house intel committee chairman devin nunez, the fbi turn over unredacted 2016 memo that you'd lined reasoning starting up the trump russia investigation. chairman nunez requesting unredacted copies of the four applications for fisa warrants that allowed the fbi to snoop on

individuals in the trump campaign. we turn to chris farrell with "judicial watch." chris, who wrote this memo? i'll wondering if peter strzok was involved? >> that is the informed opinion, strzok was the writer of opening case memo. it is the foundation piece for why they did what they did. that is frankly why they're terrified to release the actual contents. david: after all we know about peter strzok, by the way, correct me if i'm wrong, he is not only working with the fbi but i think he still has security clearance? i wonder why? >> they put him in the personnel office so he can further orchestrate the assignment of politically reliable persons in the fbi. david: unbelievable. why doesn't jeff sessions do something about that? >> yeah. why isn't he indicted frankly? i don't know, there is a lot of pattycake and a lot of dancing around and super cautious

treatment that the average citizen would never receive. david: never, never. getting back to the memo, what interests me most, fisa warrants that allow the fbi to essentially spy on the trump campaign. we have seen little bits and pieces of it, but what nunez is trying to get is the whole thing. so we can see whether or not the trump dossier was really the basis for that correct? no correct. frankly i think mr. nunez either has seen them or, at least has reason to understand what they actually say. he is simply trying to get a clean, unredacted version so that they can go through a declassifications process is and make it public. but i think that the deep down inside, mr. nunez knows exactly what it says. david: chris, earlier this week we had a leak from the mueller group that essentially the president was not a target of a criminal investigation in the

whole matter. and, yet you wouldn't know it from the press. the press said yeah, but, you fill in the blank. that led jonathan turley, a pretty moderate down the road kind of legal analyst to say the following. this continued refusal to acknowledge positive developments for trump is a disturbing pathology. would you agree? >> it is. there is sort of rabid effort in the mainstream media. they can't let go. in their mind the american public should never have even been allowed to vote for president trump. so the notion that somehow he became president, you know, it still gives them a case of the vapors. they will clutch their pearls and fall over from thought of it. david: chris farrell, from "judicial watch." thank you very much. >> thanks, david. lea: trade retaliation, farmers across the nation fear consequences following china's newly proposed tariffs on u.s.

agriculture products. we'll talk to a harrison county farmer of his personal account. that is next. how do you win at business? stay at la quinta. where we're changing with stylish make-overs. then at your next meeting,

set your seat height to its maximum level. bravo, tall meeting man. start winning today. book now at lq.com

lea: trade retaliation hitting farmers across the nation. china slapping tariffs on 100 key imports including cars, soybeans and pork. with the united states plan of tariffs on $50 billion of chinese imports. what impact does it have on the farmers. we have casey with us. a seventh generation farmer. >> i am here. lea: thanks for being with us. you are a farmer by trade, you grew up on family farm where you raised cattle and pork. tell me, you have said that this retaliation from china has

already hurt farmers. can you explain that? >> yeah. absolutely. i mean, not just in terms of commodity prices, but, in terms of what we have to plan for, for the coming year. i mean this is spring. this is an important time of the year where farmers make their decisions on their operations, whether to invest in equipment, whether to you know, plant varieties of commodities. what to do with their herds. how to work on their forward contracting. it is an important time of year and it is stressful anyway. whenever you have something like this on top of it add as level of stress. lea: another thing we heard, jeff flock was reporting yesterday when prices for soy, for example was dropping, china came in and bought. that can't make marm percent happy. but the question is the short term pain worth it for long term payoff that president trump is trying to achieve?

>> in agriculture you're used to peaks and valleys in the commodities market. we'll have high prices again and we'll have low prices again. we understand what the president is trying to do. we understand we in agriculture are being absolutely targeted by the chinese and especially considering that we're also a group that supports president trump. we believe that he has our best interests in mind and that he is going to work for the best possible deal. that is why we supported him, but that doesn't mean that we are in favor of these retaliatory type actions as it relates to these tariffs that are being implemented. we would rather him focus on negotiating the best possible deal with nafta that could be had. we believe they can do it and improve nafta. that is what we would encourage him and his folks in the u.s. trade-offs to do. lea: all right. casey, thank you very much for your insight today. nice to speak with you. >> you bet, thank you. david: we have breaking news.

president trump just speaking to reporters on air force one. he is talking about amazon. scott pruitt, even stormy daniels. we'll bring you his comments right after a short break, stay with us

david: president trump returning from west virginia on air force one, answers questions about amazon, saying we'll see what happens, the post office is not doing well, we'll see, the playing field has to be leveled. talked about epa chief scott pruitt. the president supporting him, i think he has done a fantastic job. i just left coal and energy country they love scott pruitt, they feel strongly. then he talked about stormy daniel, asked whether he knew about $130,000 payment, he said simply, no. so a lot of stuff there from the president making headlines,

thank you for joining us today. lea: good to be here. david: that is it for us, risk and reward starts now. lea: see you soon. >> rose is wonderful, we want to remove barriers. i want to rumor tax barriers, and energy barriers, president trump like an editorial, i believe this stuff. trump has ended the war on business, the war on visitors, you can see the tick up this year in activity this great stuff. liz: trade war fear subside, president trump talking up tax cuts for small businesses in west virginia today, market looking ahead to a potentially strong monthly jobs respect tomorrow -- report tomorrow. now nancy pelosi making it official, democrats will raise your taxes if they take back