mccartney owens born eight pounds eight ounces. i said they should have named her -- >> stop! >> what a beautiful picture congratulations, we love you, we miss you! so happy for you. >> "bulls & bears" starts right now. >> another democrat entering the 2020 democratic field. beto o'rourke is ready making way through some of his comments today. we will play them for you. this is "bulls & bears" thank you for joining us, i am david asman. generally take christina -- liz peek, jonathan honig and -- >> and willing to serve as a next president of the united states of america. this is a defining moment of truth for the country and every single one of us. >> former texas congressman already hitting the trail today in iowa following the announcement and wasting no time during several of his democratic challengers.

and throwing his support behind the green new deal. >> will criticize the green new deal for being too bold or unmanageable. i will tell you what.i have not seen anything better that addresses a singular crisis that we face. a crisis that could at its worst, lead to extinction. make sure the worlds greatest superpower, the greatest democracy, the greatest economy brings everything that we have to this unique challenge. literally. not to be melodramatic but literally the future of the world depends on us right now, here where we are. [applause] let's find a way to do this. >> the future of the world. o'rourke issuing some dire warnings about an impending environmental disaster if we don't get on board something at the green new deal. is he right? >> yes, sure. you know, little old me is just one vote. i'm just one vote but i am a jilted fiscal conservative vote and very open-minded. when i hear this guy come out i

want to hear what he has to say. and what does he do? the first thing he does, he goes into fantasyland about the deal that even the proponents of it backed away from. and then he goes into the al gore dance. no al gore, who 14 years ago said we are all going to be gone in 10 years. he now changes it to 12 years. he has already lost my ear and he was already lost my vote on the first day and i don't think i am alone. i am tired of these people, they think we're a bunch of marks and they think that we are stupid and i think enough is enough at this point in time. >> my god. gary, i think you are right that this kind of alarmism -- >> of course i am right! >> ill not so with a majority of the country. i would say the freight democrat jumping into a field, a very bold progressive, he probably had to embrace the

green new deal.i think it's awkward that he's trying to position himself a little as a moderate. his voting record is more moderate than a lot of people on the far left. it is more like amy klobuchar. i think he's actually got kind of a thin road to walk here. maybe he felt this was the one thing that he could kind of buy into that would give him some enthusiasm on the left. i think it is a mistake for him because i think it is foolish. >> hold on a second because we have a special guest will bring in who has a little expertise on the subject. patrick moore, cofounder of greenpeace. great to see you patrick, thank you for being here. you heard what beto o'rourke said, he said, not to be too dramatic or melodramatic. but it's going to be the end of the world in 12 years. what is your reaction? >> well, my reaction is he must be following the exact same line as aoc. i don't have these people get this idea that the world is

going to come to an end, the environment has been getting cleaner for 50 years. the air is cleaner, the water is cleaner now and in our part of the world. it is true that china and india and indonesia and countries in asia and some in africa, need to do more work. but they're coming up out of poverty now as well. and they are demanding more environmental standards. i simply don't understand how anybody could think that their children won't be able to breathe the air in 10 years. what is he thinking? >> if i may just interject and say what he is thinking. if you look at the items he mentioned, environmental, healthcare, money and politics and he has talked about racial equality. those are four topics that resident really well with a younger and far left. they did research on that so i feel he is trying to cater to

that group like liz said, he has been relatively moderate thus far. we've not really hurt his opinion on anything so he's playing his cards right. i think it was a little vain to come out in vanity fair and say did not mean to prepare for his speech at all. it comes out of him. he can still prove himself going forward. >> hold on one second jonathan, i want to throw something in here. we are able to catch up with alexandria ocasio-cortez, the author of the green new deal and here is what she had to say about all this. let's play the tape and jonathan, then get your reaction. go ahead. >> well i mean, it is a winning issue. we are talking about 67 percent of iowa voters in the caucus support the green new deal and now 91 percent -- [inaudible] clearly it is a jobs plan, a huge turnaround plan. we're talking about money and investments and not just throwing it away in infrastructure but getting us to cheaper energy and you know,

really reinvigorating our economy. [laughter] >> you know, it all sounds pretty promising. was not mentioned david however, is the cost. and this is the irony. you know, liberals love the environment. but they hate people. people who actually live in the environment. so things like adeno, air travel and fossil fuels, they actually benefit my and kind. and as our guest talked about the more fossil fuels we burn them better mankind is not pure my question is, have any of these dire warnings from the environmental warnings ever played out? this is i mean we've been talking about the world, global warming and the oceans overflowing for years now. has any of this ever played out? >> patrick? >> no, none of it has ever played out. the real irony is he's a beto

on one hand is saying there will be these refuges of the border but he's talking about the wall being taken down. what kind of a position is that?and more portly, the real climate refugees of the people from canada were going down south in the winter to get away from the cold.not the other way around. >> patrick, let's talk specifically about the green new deal.there are a couple of things mentioned. one, we want to be off all carbon energy in the course of about a dozen years. i am wondering what that would do to the economy. not to mention the fact that they want to retrofit every single structure, building in the united states. to be completely green, completely carbon free. what would happen to our economy if we were to do this? >> well i guess they're not going to be able to use machines like bulldozers and cranes that use fossil flows to retrofit all of the high-rises in the united states. it's completely and utterly

ridiculous peer that is 85 percent of the energy. if you cut 85 percent of the energy you completely destroy and collapse the entire economy. including the growing of food. and this generally leads to starvation. so i would think that people better look at this closely. because it took one week and for them to put this green new deal together. these people are basically fronts for this justice democracy and the sunrise movement. this is an extremely radical movement that basically thinks that venezuela is a model. >> patrick, you're very educated, in your judgment, if the climate on the global continue to warm, i guess it is warming as it isnow, what is the impact ? >> the fact is, in 300 years, the global climate has only warmed about one to 1.5 degrees celsius. is nothing compared to what is

gone through in past ages when life flourished in a much warmer world than it is today. these people cannot see back more than hundred and 50 years. and it's only halfway from the little ice age started to end. people starved during the little ice age around 1700. before that in the middle of a warm., the vikings colonized greenland and were able to grow food there. they had to evacuate as the little ice age came in. and this is just the most recent small swing in global temperature.going back to the ice ages and the glaciation that has occurred all through the centuries, they know nothing. what they're doing is proposing a catastrophe out of nothing. >> robert -- thank you very much for the explanation there. i think jonathan is actually spot on when he made the comparison. if immigration to republican climate to the democrats, what is the commonality? fear. i want to get your take on the fact that there are several

house republicans, leaders suggesting maybe we should go ahead. patrick i'm sorry. that we should go ahead and vote on the green new deal. what do you think about having that vote here? do you think will change anything? >> i think there should be a vote on it so we can count heads as to how many people are crazy enough to go along with this thing. it is so stupid and ridiculous to suggest the 85 percent of all energy should be eliminated in 10 years. how are they going to -- as i said in the beginning, the real key is how are they going to grow food. for all the people in the country. they must think that food comes from the supermarket. no, there are millions of farmers and truck drivers that bring in. you will not be running in with an electric car. it's just not going to happen. and even so, batteries in electric cars have to be charged with electricity. and most of the electricity

today's made with fossil fuels. >> is all about getting control, getting government control, aoc will he tell you where to drive. if you can drive, what kind of fuel to use. it seems to me if the gop wanted to take an approach, it should be one of property rights. no one has the right to pollute. no one has the right to influence your air but you just want to ban fossil fuels outright, ignores the tremendous value that they provide every human on this earth. >> jonathan, i think the other point is that someone needs to be aware , it is not just a vested interest of the fossil fuel industries that are fighting some of these measures, there is enormous vested interest, and money behind the green movement. this kind of alarmism brings

and grants and all kinds of things that this effort lives on. >> patrick can speak to that. you probably saw some of that at greenpeace. did you, patrick? >> yes they see organizations like greenpeace start with noble intentions. then they turned into a business fundraising and making money. and then they turn into a racket. that's what's happening here. this is a racket. they are scaring people. recruiting people, classrooms and schools of children. it is child abuse to use children in this way. that's why we don't let them vote and we don't let them drink and don't let them drive cars. because they are not old enough to appear there also not old enough to know how to run the whole country. >> patrick moore, we thank you very much for coming in. we really appreciate it. please come back again. >> any time. thank you for having me on. >> thank you so much. he thought the largest ever admissions scandal for college could get bigger but now it is pouring in. the financial fallout next. >> think about the hundreds of thousands of kids out there tonight who are studying hard, mom and dad don't have a lot of money, don't have a lot, they're working their rear ends

off because they believe in the american dream. and then you have these chuckle heads, like these parents come along and do this because they are entitled. to be nobody but yourself in a world which is doing it's best to make you everybody else... ♪ ♪ means to fight the hardest battle, which any human being can fight and never stop. does this sound dismal? it isn't. ♪ ♪ it's the most wonderful life on earth. ♪ ♪

monthly incomeonwide annuity, for the rest of your life. it's the most wonderful life on earth. that's what i'm talking about. how about those song lyrics? what song lyrics? tell him again. tell him again. repeat it. yeah, same thing. (advisor) so with a nationwide annuity, you can get protected... comcast business built the nation's largest gig-speed network. then went beyond. beyond chasing down network problems. to knowing when and where there's an issue. beyond network complexity. to a zero-touch, one-box world. optimizing performance and budget. beyond having questions. to getting answers. "activecore, how's my network?" "all sites are green." all of which helps you do more than your customers thought possible. comcast business. beyond fast. >> the admissions scandal.

if parent has filed a $500 million civil suit accusing 45 of defrauding and causing emotional stress. the parents is her son was not admitted to some colleges because of wealthy parents that lied, cheated and bribed to get their children in instead. actress, felicity huffman and lori loughlin are among the defendants named in the lawsuit. as is william singer, the accused mastermind of this scheme. apparently working with

prosecutors. let's bring a criminal defense attorney, andrew -- does parent have a case at all here?it's a lot of money? >> i think that we have got a story that everyone in the country agrees on. but as this law suits go it's ridiculous. there is no reasonable possibility that the lawsuits are going to be successful. the idea that someone has to prove both that their son or daughter would otherwise have gone in and that they were damaged as a result of this, it's not going to happen. >> have actually been reporting on the story for quite some time. i fly there is justice eco-causing where the wealthy live and they're not even doing as a steppingstone. you have families that see it as a path to middle-class. whereas the rich are seeing this as a status symbol. getting rid of uncertainty. if you look at some schools involved is not just ivy league economy of university of texas and wake forest as well. i almost see that his parents never leave them believing in

the capability of the children. because they had to cheat to get them in. but do think that this shows college is not the great equalizer anymore and that the system is just completely broken? >> i think everybody would agree that throughout history, there is unfairness at some point in colleges. where there is a donation of a building or some sort of legacy program. those are the legal ways to do it. now we have this illegal program that seems to be getting kids into schools that do not deserve to get into the schools. and we are seeing articles coming out of hollywood where people are supporting these actresses and the actors who are involved in this. and somehow supporting or understanding that it was happening. it is just mind-boggling. >> i cannot imagine. i mean i have to say, i have heard a lot of people talk about college admissions. watched a lot of films go through the process and it is a pretty horrible process. for sure, most parents want to do everything they can to improve their kids odds.

i've never heard of something like this. i have to assume this is an incredibly narrow thing that has happened. -- the systems across the country, because of whatever it was. 50, 60 even 75 people doing this. i have never heard of something like this. what do you think? >> i cannot find a chance particularly similar in terms of a college cheating scandal making its way through the criminal prosecution process. this is a valid law that they brought against the parents and the people cheating and receiving the money on the other side. the u.s. attorney was very specific when he was talking about the charges the other day at the press conference. he says there's no evidence that the colleges themselves were complicit in what was going on. i don't think it is something that reaches to the tops of the colleges but it's something that needs to be looked at the way the test scores are assessed as well as the

athletic programs. >> the entity is that it comes at a time when more and more companies are saying that it is not important to have a college education. apple, ibm, among them. how much of this is really about status and were you surprised as i was, at the dollar figures involved here? hundreds and hundreds of thousands of dollars to get your kids i mean is this all about the status for the uber wealthy? because employers are not looking for this by and large frequency of lori loughlin 's daughter who branded this idea that she's a student. that's what these people are doing. living a life of the appearance of what they want in their life. whether it is going to usc are going to university of san diego. it does not matter. it is just that they're trying to make something happen to look like something. >> a tremendous disservice to

their kids. >> to that point, there was another lawsuit. two students went up to eight universities involved. if this becomes a class action lawsuit, is there a case? i know i should not asked two classes but could the students lose their degree if there midway through their education process? >> so, the first question about the lawsuits. i don't think there is a reasonable lawsuit that will be successful because the idea is that you have to show because of this, somebody did not get in. there was some sort of cause and effect. it has to be something relatively direct in that connection.as well as a loss. that even if they would've gone income of this with the damage would have been. to the second question, and i'm sorry i forgot the second question. >> it was regarding whether the kids can lose their degree or be kicked out of school legally. >> yes, absolutely. i do think that they are facing issues with regard to expulsion. usc has come out so that they will look at each case case by case. i don't know that, i think

there are academic rules regarding that. they do indicate they can expel students as well as take away degrees. >> forgive me but i have to ask interest in breaking news that we received about connecticut supreme court decision on remington. the gun maker and remington. they have ruled that remington can be sued for making the rifle that was used in the sandy hook massacre. i'm wondering what effect do you think this will have on the gun industry? >> any mass litigation, this idea that you can go back to look at tobacco litigation. the idea that you can sue these makers of guns or any sort of dangerous type of item, is going to have a tremendous effect. it will result in not only an individual that was harmed by guns but every lawyer out there who is ready to file the lawsuits to go after it. >> andrew we have to leave it

at that. thank you so much for coming in. good to see you. the top military general blowing the whistle when he says google is doing in china. when he just said that has some folks up in arms. >> frankly, it may be not a full characterization of the way it really is. it's more of a direct benefit. she can stay with you to finish her senior year. things will be tight but, we can make this work. ♪ now... grandpa, what about your dream car? this is my dream now. principal we can help you plan for that .

itso chantix can help you quit "slow turkey." along with support, chantix is proven to help you quit. with chantix you can keep smoking at first and ease into quitting. chantix reduces the urge so when the day arrives, you'll be more ready to kiss cigarettes goodbye. when you try to quit smoking, with or without chantix. you may have nicotine withdrawal symptoms. stop chantix and get help right away if you have changes in... behavior or thinking, aggression, hostility, depressed mood, suicidal thoughts or actions, seizures, new or worse heart or blood vessel problems, sleepwalking, or life- threatening allergic and skin reactions. decrease alcohol use. use caution driving or operating machinery. tell your doctor if you've had mental health problems. the most common side effect is nausea. quit smoking "slow turkey." talk to your doctor about chantix.

the big drug companies don't see they see us as profits. we're paying the highest prescription drug prices in the world so they can make billions? americans shouldn't have to choose between buying medication and buying food for our families. it's time for someone to look out for us. congress, stop the greed. cut drug prices now.

♪ mmm, exactly!ug liberty mutual customizes your car insurance, so you only pay for what you need. nice! but uh, what's up with your partner? oh! we just spend all day telling everyone how we customize car insurance because no two people are alike, so... limu gets a little confused when he sees another bird that looks exactly like him. ya... he'll figure it out. only pay for what you need.

♪ liberty. liberty. liberty. liberty. ♪ >> your tony the google an american company supposedly, is refusing to work with the department of defense that is doing work with china in china in a way that at least indirectly benefits the chinese government. is that correct? >> the work that google is doing in china is indirectly benefiting the chinese military. we watch with great concern when partners work in china knowing that there is that indirect benefit. in fact indirect may not be the full characterization of it.

it's more of a direct benefit to the chinese military. >> general joe dunford, chairman of the joint chiefs of staff shocking -- google announced they were withdrawing from u.s. military contract because when they reached out to get a statement we were redirected. where is the moral compass here?>> i think is quite unimaginable.i think that sergei and larry should be put in front of the joint chiefs of staff and explain themselves. without security and safety and military, we have nothing and just to think that they would do something that helps the chinese but basically tell us, not for the us, i may have to find microsoft, bing or yahoo.

>> their model, don't be evil. don't aid evil. and this company whose whole business is built on trust and privacy. i just cannot imagine this isn't doing tremendous damage to their reputation. both with chinese in china and also american audience. and it comes at a time when you see facebook is positioning toward privacy. i don't think many senate committees think google by aiding the chinese military is really doing some serious damage to their reputation and their bottom line. >> and i think it also comes at a time when elizabeth warren and now several other people, money for president are talking about breaking up the companies because of the monopoly power they have. there is no company after the has a bigger monopoly than google. so i think it seems there is little vulnerable on the public relations front. let's also remember, it is not just a i where google is helping china. it is also on surveillance, all

kinds of surveillance products. which by the way, aides to the incarceration and -- of muslims in china. this is pretty appalling stuff and i think google has a lot to answer for here. >> to jump this point, it is no longer, don't be evil. it is do the right thing. the model change when they became alphabet. we are talking about the connection with china. china the actual government owns $5 trillion of the chinese economy. so google will probably play the card that maybe it was an indirect benefit but they must have known given the governments influence. i think david brought a good point up in the intro that google did not want to move for with the jedi pentagon cloud computing project with $10 billion because it went against the corporate conduct. and yet, they must know that there is some type of indirect benefit in china and to the military there. given the government influence. >> there should be a lot of

pressure put on them. i would love to see, wake up in the morning and the front pages of every newspaper have the story. where the head of the network news, each and every night. but you know what? i doubt it. i don't think we will see it. they are to into trump, trump, trump 24/7. it will probably be out of the news in a day or so. >> we are reporting and the chairman of the joint chiefs of staff cannot be ignored. and he went beyond saying was sort of an indirect, innocent mistake that google was making. saying that in some cases it was direct. he paused and said no, it was not indirect. remember the 4000 google employees that were protesting the pentagon contract. they said we will never build warfare technology. but apparently, that is exactly what they are doing with the other side. >> and again -- >> david, there been rumors as well. that googles been working on search engine technology. it directly sensors the results for china's behalf.

to assist in repression, i can understand that not want government contracts but to assist in repression, you have to wonder what the google leaders are thinking. >> by the way, is not like the united states is totally had on some of these technologies.on ai for example, china last year published over 50 percent of the important papers on ai. which were kind of viewed as a sign that they have gone ahead of us in terms of technology but maybe google should decide, you are doing this on your own. we are not going to help you if we are not going to help america. >> quite a story. we are glad we could bring it to you today. meanwhile the president gearing up for his first veto of his presidency. this after a major senate vote on the emergency declaration. we are live in capitol hill with chad for r the latest, nex. . $4.95. no matter what you trade, at fidelity it's just $4.95 per online u.s. equity trade.

no matter what you trade, at fidelity ♪ ♪ i can do more to lower my a1c. because my body can still make its own insulin. and i take trulicity once a week to activate my body to release it, like it's supposed to. trulicity is not insulin. it starts acting in my body from the first dose and continues to work when i need it, 24/7. trulicity is an injection to improve blood sugar in adults with type 2 diabetes when used with diet and exercise. don't use it as the first medicine to treat diabetes, or if you have type 1 diabetes or diabetic ketoacidosis. don't take trulicity if you or your family have medullary thyroid cancer, you're allergic to trulicity, or have multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type 2. stop trulicity and call your doctor right away if you have symptoms of a serious allergic reaction, a lump or swelling in your neck, or severe stomach pain. serious side effects may include pancreatitis. taking trulicity with a sulfonylurea or insulin increases your low blood sugar risk.

common side effects include nausea, diarrhea, vomiting, abdominal pain, and decreased appetite. these can lead to dehydration, which may worsen kidney problems. i choose once-weekly trulicity to activate my within. if you need help lowering your a1c, ask your doctor about once-weekly trulicity. (bird chirping) lots to do, hope you fuelled up. sure did. that storm sure ripped through. yep, we gotta fix that fence and herd the cattle back in. let's get at it. (whistle) (dog barking) (♪)

do i use a toothpaste that whitens my teeth? or one that's good for my teeth? now i don't have to choose. from crest 3d white. the whitening therapy collection. now with charcoal or coconut oil. it gently whitens. plus, it has a fortifying formula to protect your enamel. crest. healthy, beautiful smiles for life. but allstate actually helps you drive safely... with drivewise. it lets you know when you go too fast... ...and brake too hard. with feedback to help you drive safer. giving you the power to actually lower your cost. unfortunately, it can't do anything about that. now that you know the truth... are you in good hands? >> the senate voting 59 ã41 to end the presidents emergency

declaration at the border with all 47 democrats voting yes along with 12 republicans. the president responding on twitter this afternoon quote - i look forward to vetoing the just past democrat inspired resolution which would open borders while increasing crime, drugs and trafficking in our country. i think all of the strong republicans that voted to support border security and are desperately needed wall. join us now at the latest from capitol hill, fox news senior capitol hill producer, chad pergram. a lot of defections. 59 does not come close to the 67 that will be needed to override the presidents veto. right? >> that's right. and you get some of the other roll calls. that they've taken in the senate in the past few weeks where you've had a number of republicans breaking away and kind of rebuking the president on how they dealt with saudi arabia at the death of jamal khashoggi. dealing with their yemen

resolution yesterday. it's about the right number. about the same number thatyou found on some of these other resolutions. some people pointed out they did not get the 60 , that is a psychological level in the senate. you need 60 votes to end a filibuster. we thought there was going to be one more, thom tillis, republican from north carolina that faces an election next in a swing state just before the vote. he went to the senate floor and said he would vote no on this. he would vote to sustain the national emergency and he'd been one of the first several weeks ago saying i do not think this is right. he broke off there. there will be the key. talk about the senate being eight votes short. what really matter is the house of representatives. there are about 40 votes short there we need about 285 , that we two thirds based on the vote a couple of weeks ago. we are expecting the president will veto this tomorrow. and we are ready hearing from democratic sources that the vote in the house to attempt the override which is likely to be unsuccessful would be on 26 march. there was some question earlier in the day because i tried to

pin down the house speaker, nancy pelosi. as to whether or not they will go through the override vote. because that would be a bad vote for some freshman moderate democrats from battleground districts. that's a problem for them. the vote to override, is just not a good vote. there's a reason why democrats won the house. which she says it will in fact go forward and for the 26th of march. >> how do you assess the politics here? why did thom tillis backtrack on his support of this measure? and i mean i get susan collins and lisa murkowski. there was kind of looking for safe haven i guess. but everyone else, is a polling showing may be that voters actually want a secure border? and maybe this is kind of a stupid thing to do on the part of republicans? >> collins will have a competitive reelection again come a swing state. the politics are there. they were really working on thom tillis along with some other senators to get them to align with the president. keep in mind the republican

convention in 2020 will be in charlotte, north carolina. there is also some whispers out there that maybe there will be a primary challenge to him. certainly he had problems in the general peer we hear names like mark meadows, chair of the freedom caucus. also mark walker a republican congressman from north carolina. recently chair the republican senate committee which is a group way bigger than meadows group with the largest group of republicans in the house of representatives. it is not completely off the table any of the scenarios but you can imagine some could really have a primary challenge where problems with conservative voters if they oppose the president. even if they would have the problem on the other side in the general election. >> thank you. >> chad, you just talked about nancy pelosi and the fact that they will go ahead and possibly override this veto. but i read your note and another in u.s. history you said it's only happened 111 times. so why even risk the failure?

>> sometimes you want to play out the process. i also point out that the last attempted and unsuccessful voter override, a veto override came in february 2016. that was after the house and senate voted to repeal obama care, president obama vetoed it and paul ryan then would speak of -- the speak of the house and we are going to another process. there were 50 votes short. and that is a good vote. for republicans to the campaign since 2009 saying we are against obama care. we want to repeal and replace obamacare. for those republicans to be on the record one more time saying, we did all we could to try and repeal obama care even though it was unsuccessful, that's a problem. but me -- maybe nancy pelosi figures -- it's a thoroughly vote. those opposed the national emergency would have problems and they can vote their way. and vote in their district. remember for the moderates it helps for them to have votes with the president and also to

show some distance between them and the democratic leadership of nancy pelosi. >> this is gary kaltbaum. i need a politics lesson so if the question is a little nacve i apologize. yesterday, the president was able, because of safety reasons, to declare boeing to ground the jets without a vote but today, for safety reasons, the president is not able to declare an emergency and then you go -- what is the difference? >> there is no statute that directly deals with boeing or aviation. what they have done in the way that the white house crafted the use of the national emergency, was very specific here. you can have an effort to try to rebuke them on boeing if you really wanted to. i think anyone wants to do that. and there is no real political benefit. i think people are concerned

about the safety of aviation. especially happened in ethiopia and with boeing. but you have folks in the house and senate saying that we want to have this vote in the statute of 1976 is set up in a play that we can have the rollcall vote. in that respect it is good politics but no one was to go back and undo the other national emergency. keep in mind there's a number of other national emergencies on the books right now. that go on and on and on. some going back 30 years. they don't go back to undo those. >> chad, are they saying that the difference is this has to do with money not being authorized and the constitution says congress has to approve all spending? the fact that it's a spending issue and boeing. >> you could also argue with boeing and with aviation issue because remember that you know, congress has oversight over the faa. they appropriate money for the faa. you could possibly apply it there. all of this comes down to how creative you can be. i will say from a constitutional standpoint, they are unlocked firmer ground

because it deals with where the power of the purse lies. >> jonathan is dying to get a question. well have like 10 seconds go ahead very quickly. in five seconds. >> the present put a lot of political capitol into this chad. how much of a walk is this for his efforts for the emergency declared?>> the fact that the national emergency will still be there, they can override the veto we worked with his base. that's why i'm saying the british call this having your cake and eating it too. we have a lot of republicans in the senate who are against the national, excuse me they don't want to raise -- >> former white house economic advisor sounding off in trade negotiations with china. why he says the u.s. is not desperate for a deal. is he right? that debate coming next. what's a company worth?

how do you determine the durable value of a business in the transportation industry without knowing firsthand the unique challenges in that sector. coming out here, seeing the infrastructure firsthand, talking with the people behind the numbers creates a different picture. once i know what a business is truly worth, we can make better informed investment decisions. that's why i go beyond the numbers. ♪ you wouldn't accept an incomplete job from any one else. why accept it from your allergy pills? most pills don't finish the job because they don't relieve nasal congestion. flonase sensimist is different. it relieves all your worst symptoms, including nasal congestion, which most pills don't. it's more complete allergy relief. and all from a gentle mist you can barely feel. flonase sensimist helps block six key inflammatory substances. most pills only block one. and six is greater than one. flonase sensimist.

and six is greater than one. this is moving day with the best in-home wifi experience and millions of wifi hotspots to help you stay connected. and this is moving day with reliable service appointments in a two-hour window so you're up and running in no time. show me decorating shows. this is staying connected with xfinity to make moving... simple. easy. awesome.

stay connected while you move with the best wifi experience and two-hour appointment windows. click, call or visit a store today. and our shirts from custom ink help bring us together. we order custom ink to welcome new employees, personalize team shirts, and even for company events. the design lab is so easy to use. we just upload out logo and if we have any questions, customer service is there to help. seeing our team together in custom ink gear is an amazing reminder of how far we've come as a business. - [narrator] custom ink has hundreds of products to help you look and feel like a team. upload your logo or start your design today at customink.com >> president trump says he is

in no rush to make a deal with china. warning beijing he would not sign off on an agreement if it did not meet u.s. demands but that form economic advisor, told freakonomics radio he says

that he's thinks he's desperate for a win. >> i think the u.s. is desperate right now for an agreement. >> agreement or headline? >> the only big open issue right now that he can claim is a big win, the hope would have a big impact on the stock market would be a chinese resolution.>> but with our economy so strong, and china's so weak, why would we be desperate for some kind of a deal? what do you think? >> because the tariffs are hurting americans. economics is second and third level effects. as they say, there's no such thing as a free lunch. these tariffs are costing not the chinese but they are costing americans hundred million dollars a day. this has been proven. henry hazlitt, adam smith, the

turkey economy -- that's why think that gary cohn that knows all about economics himself knows how quickly the u.s. should strike a deal. >> it's how much i love when jonathan hoenig goes off on tariffs? [laughter] [multiple speakers] >> look, all evidence in, i do not think we are in a rush. all we been doing is watching for year and and a half or two years and nothing is getting done. our economy so strong, china's heading south as south can be. and the president today out of nowhere, we will take our time. this is acting desperate a few weeks ago i would've said maybe yes but right now, it looks like much ado about nothing. >> and i would say that politically, number one is it would be better for the president to do this closer to election. -- >> i can't wait that long! >> how about a year from now? the perfect time for a deal. secondly, everyone is watching very closely and will jump on him like crazy if he does not get a solid deal. if they don't get an

understanding on, intellectual property and some for subsidy for state owned enterprises. it seems better to wait and get a better deal both politically and maybe economically in the long run. >> i think that waiting is not in the cards. given the pressure on the president at the moment. you have things not going so well talking about funding the border wall. then you have the summit that some people say it was good that he stepped away but bad because we have no win. there could be some potential pressure on him. political pressure that president xi jinping does not face because he is in a term that last forever in his country. i think there are some differences there but i do think it's a big -- [multiple speakers] >> not to mention the farm communities who have also been devastated. the big supporters of the president have also been devastated. >> just say that china is not suffering at all as a result of this is -- [multiple speakers] >> you did say that.

you said it is us suffering not the chinese, right?they are suffering. >> guys -- >> go ahead. >> i just want to interject because i asked steve mnuchin today. he had a gaggle with reporters this afternoon. i asked him specifically about the timeline and is there a change of sentiment for china? do they want a deal first and then they will come to the united states? he ever said he would not give me an exact time frame but he said it is still possible to have the meeting in florida then he asked about april and he would not answer. i think it means it can happen soon. >> meanwhile, day after day goes by and there's $100 billion a day that americans are paying and david quickly, just as there is a win-win for those that engage in the absence of trade is lose lose. so yes china -- consumers have been hurt as well. >> the real surprise to me is that china is not so desperate. i would've thought right now

they would do something or come quicker towards us because as i said, all their economic numbers are just you know, they can say all they want. i think that they are in recession right now. >> a lot of people think the same about russia. thank you gang. tesla said to unveil the newest model in a couple of hours. but will they have any takers? cookie cutter portfolios. fisher investments tailors portfolios to your goals and needs. some only call when they have something to sell. fisher calls regularly so you stay informed. and while some advisors are happy to earn commissions whether you do well or not. fisher investments fees are structured so we do better when you do better. maybe that's why most of our clients come from other money managers. fisher investments. clearly better money management. when it comes to reducing the evsugar in your family's diet,m. ..

bringing you more great tasting beverages with less sugar or no sugar at all. smaller portion sizes, clear calorie labels and reminders to think balance. because we know mom wants what's best. more beverage choices, smaller portions, less sugar. balanceus.org might mean a trip back to the doctor's office just for a shot. but why go back there when you can stay home with neulasta onpro? strong chemo can put you at risk of serious infection. in a key study neulasta reduced the risk of infection from 17% to 1%, a 94% decrease. neulasta onpro is designed to deliver neulasta the day after chemo and is used by most patients today. neulasta is for certain cancer patients receiving strong chemotherapy. do not take neulasta if you're allergic to it or neupogen (filgrastim). an incomplete dose could increase infection risk. ruptured spleen, sometimes fatal as well as serious lung problems, allergic reactions, kidney injuries and capillary leak syndrome have occurred.

report abdominal or shoulder tip pain, trouble breathing or allergic reactions to your doctor right away. in patients with sickle cell disorders, serious, sometimes fatal crises can occur. the most common side effect is bone and muscle ache. if you'd rather be home, ask your doctor about neulasta onpro. pay no more than $5 per dose with copay card.

to be nobody but yourself in a world which is doing it's best to make you everybody else... ♪ ♪ means to fight the hardest battle, which any human being can fight and never stop. does this sound dismal? it isn't. ♪ ♪ it's the most wonderful life on earth. ♪ ♪ it's the most wonderful life on earth. this is where i trade and manage my portfolio. since i added futures, i have access to the oil markets

and gold markets. okay. i'm plugged into equities - trade confirmed - and i have global access 24/7. meaning i can do what i need to do, then i can focus on what i want to do. visit learnfuturestoday.com to see what adding futures can do for you. david: tess thank planning to unveil their suv version of the sedan. they are closing a number of stores, raising prices on some of them their vehicles. will their most of enthusiastic owners like this model? >> if you look at the suv sales.

it accounts to 15% of tesla sales just in the first quarter. they need a win with the direction of the stock right now. >> musk has set the bar very high in terms of expectations for this car. but he's got a lot going on on his plate, including rolling out what's meant to be the next most of important car in his lineup. good luck. >> a the end of the music man, people say, where is the band? >> in spite of the smoking of the weed and in spite of a lot of the chaos. they make good cars. if they make another good car, i can promise you people will be buying it. it's all about the product, it's all about the price.

dave there are folks, thank you very much. great stuff today. that does it for "bulls and bears." thank you for watching. we'll see you back here next time. >> i will probably have to be there. it won't be overturned. the legal scholars say it's totally constitutional. it's a border security vote. it's pure and simple. it's a vote for no crime. >> the president rests his declaration on the national emergency act. and that act fails to define precisely what constitutes an emergency. >> i'm going to be voting in favor of the resolution much disapproval. for me it's a constitutional question about the balance of power. this is not about the president or about the border secur