nato, you have to pay your fair share. >> i have heard that. susan will be back for melissa all week-long, it is bulls and bears with david asman and the crew. >> seems to be conservative if they are republicans if they are in certain group, there is discrimination. i see it absolutely on twitter. facebook, something is happening with those groups of folks that are running facebook and google and twitter. i do think we have to get to the bottom of it. david: president doubling down on social media by slamming facebook after the social media giant apologized for temporarily blocking the president's social directors account. >> and alleges a conservative bias. is this just the tip of the iceberg for the tech giants this

is bulls and bears, i am david asman, joining me morgan, robert wolf, kevin kelly and john layfield, but first hillary vaughn with latest to congressman nunes lawsuit against twitter. reporter: this $250 million lawsuit is just the first of many, congressman nunes said he will sue every social media giant he thinks is biased again conservative. -- against conservatives. >> we're go after twitter first, they are the main proliferate or, they spread fake news. the case that i'm making this was an orchestrated effort, people were targeting me. reporter: nunes said that twitter let anonymous user troll him with fake news and fake claims about him, and did nothing about it nunes named 3 different twitter accounts in

the suit. claiming to be his mom and his cow. and he name a republican strategist, saying twitter silences conservatives and promoting liberal posts on on their platform, twitter has kept silent on the lawsuit. , but not staying silence but apologizing is facebook after dropping white house social media director from writing comments on his facebook page. they accident ple accidentally t a bot. they can temporarily prevent real people and engages in such activity, but lifted in an hour or two, which is what happened in this case, we've been in touch with him, and apologize

for the up convenience. back to you. david: all right. thank you. the cows, that something else. does the president and congress nunes have a case. >> i'm having a hard time keeping a straight face with cows, can't get enough of cows. we have two things, the political argument that i think that president and nunes are trying to make. there is a serious regulatory argument on whether and i think it is about time, will social media be regulated or note by what entity. looking at this awful new zealand massacre, for hours, you saw on youtube and facebook live, it took hours for it to be taken down. that is you know silly that white house communications, one of senior communications would be blocked on twitter. as for lawsuit there are legal experts who can speak to this.

and elizabeth warren has shown last week we could have a serious regulatory discussion about what should happen to the tech companies. >> reason why this is gaining traction, year after year, we have seen a double standard with the liberal versus conservative speech, and even out recently when you hadco founder -- the cofoundedder of federalist tweet something, he was shadow banned because it had to do with lisa page. we know that juxtaposition that everyone is treated equally is not true. they do need to be regulated because we have scenic ploiting a -- exploitation happen. >> no one used facebook in a campaign more than president trump. it date he spend more money on facebook than all of the democratic candidates combined.

idea he spewing facebook, as only conservative, we know it is not accuratey. we can look at number, numbers don't like, brad pascal would say, they use everything' with facebook, now president saying they are getting prejudice against, i don't buy it. that said, i agree with morgan, this is a regulatory issue. i think that devin putting twitter and facebook at the forefront is smart, he lost his chairman ship, for him to stay relevant this is an easy group of technology people to be hit on, they should be regulated, they dominate, okay, the media space more than fox and more than nbc, they are dominating advertising. and to me they are a media company, they should be regulated lik like a media comp. >> nunes can cry me a river, i have blocked over 18,000 people on twitter, that is a fact. i used to be a bad guy.

i get death threats all of the time, cry me a riff every -- ri, good grief man, what if they are biased. you are not getting an op set, e--you don't have an a right too tweet, it is not life, liberty, pursuit of happiness and twitter, i don't think that -- >> there has been bias in media since andrew jackson challenged a guy to a duel at one time because of what he said about his wife in media, it should not be regulated. >> at all? >> no. >> i agree as it relates you know being a crybaby about twitter, people say mean stuff all of the time to me. but, you don't see any responsibility? media companies fox has to be regulated why not twitter? >> i think they should be as far as hate speech, but where is

that slippery slope, i think if there is hate speech, if bigotry, there is a problem, where does hate speech stop, when you have humans that do it they -- their bias has to fact oar into subjective view, of is it hate speech or political partnership. >> if you have a liberal bias in media company you will have liberal subjective whether you want it or not. david: to roberts point, we have figures we could put up for all of the complaining that the president does about facebook. look at how much money he is already spent, this is in past three or four months, more than all democratic opponents appreciate opponents he has combined, 3.5 million on facebook, as difficult as it is, there seem toes be a bias, i don't think that anyone would doubt there is a bias. but he still manages to use it.

>> i'm upset that john has block mertwitter followers than i have. i have to get on 10,000 now, you have blocked 18, i am not even half way there. we need too spend another min out regulatory side. we have seep new zealand seen td situation, there should be something said about a criminal, a terrorist, a killer using facebook to pr proliferate what they have done. >> more than that, zuckerberg said, the rules should not apply to facebook, they can monitor themselves, but now we know they can't. >> they have been weaponized and exploited. but we're touching around two different issues, president trump can spend as much money as

he wants advertising on facebook and twitter. separate conversation is hado banning and suppressing articles of earned actual impression, how you stop it, you have to regulate that. through different regulatory agents, because, they have created shadow profile of facebook of people who have not signed up. they buy or banking information. there has been exploiting, there are a lot of different moving parts around what is happening it is critical there sensitive data, throughout the platforms that can be exploited. >> kevin is right, if you talk to members on hill on the committees, social media companies are asking for guidance, for government for some sort of standard doing set. and i actually think in this case it would be better for government to set out some

guideline as opposed to just having facebook and twitter deciding what is acceptable and not acceptable. >> i know we'll say there was reason -- a week ago elizabeth warren was shut down on facebook. >> copyright infringement, she took their logo, and theiral dp- algorithm spotted their logo, and they stopped it. >> you do that, i do it too. that is fox news banner we do it. david: soon as it was highlighted, they put it back. it was an algorithm. >> i am saying that they dehumanize this. i had robert wolf copied 50 times on twitter. >> so popular. >> no, not 18,000, 50.

the idea that we can be copied every which way. david: i'm concerned as john is, that guidelines would turn into regulation that could slow up the workings of the internet. >> i disagree with government stepping in to regulate. i think that free market will do it there pressure on zuckerberg ander dorsey to regulate themselves, but the videos went up of this horrible new zealand massacre. tragedy. they took them down as soon as they saw them, you can't stop live video. >> it was up on youtube for i think 6 hours. we are not talking minutes but hours, so far self regulation means -- >> we need to be -- >> you think that california is better at that. >> if federal government does not chemical icome in, stating n

california has pass a message. >> you want government to regulate the speech? that is crazy to me. >> no our sensitive data and information not to bi everybodye explodeexploded. >> we'll come back. >> trade talks with china are reportedly in final stages, but are there still fears that china will walk back certain trade concessions? details coming next. naysayer said no one would subscribe to a car the way they subscribe to movies. we don't follow the naysayers. ♪ ♪

(bird chirping) lots to do, hope you fuelled up. sure did. that storm sure ripped through. yep, we gotta fix that fence and herd the cattle back in. let's get at it. (whistle) (dog barking) (♪) how do you determine the durable value of a business in the transportation industry without knowing firsthand the unique challenges in that sector. coming out here, seeing the infrastructure firsthand, talking with the people behind the numbers creates a different picture. once i know what a business is truly worth, we can make better informed investment decisions. that's why i go beyond the numbers. ♪

metastatic breast cancer is relentless, but i'm relentless too. mbc doesn't take a day off, and neither will i. i treat my mbc with everyday verzenio, the only one of its kind that can be taken every day. verzenio is the only cdk4 & 6 inhibitor approved with hormonal therapy that can be taken every day for post menopausal women with hr+, her2 negative mbc. verzenio plus an ai helped women have significantly more time without disease progression, and more than half of women saw their tumors shrink vs an ai. diarrhea is common, may be severe, or cause dehydration or infection. before taking verzenio, tell your doctor if you have fever, chills, or other signs of infection. verzenio may cause low white blood cell counts,

which may cause serious infection that can lead to death. serious liver problems can occur. symptoms include tiredness, appetite loss, stomach pain, and bleeding or bruising. blood clots that can lead to death have occurred. tell your doctor if you have pain or swelling in your arms or legs, shortness of breath, chest pain, rapid breathing or heart rate, or if you are pregnant, nursing, or plan to be pregnant. common side effects include nausea, infections, low blood cells and platelets, decreased appetite, headache, abdominal pain, tiredness, vomiting, and hair thinning or loss. i'm relentless. and my doctor and i choose to treat my metastatic breast cancer with verzenio. ask your doctor about everyday verzenio. conventional wisdom says you can't make a 400 horsepower sedan, that's also environmentally conscious. we don't follow conventional wisdom. ♪ ♪ comcast business built the nation's largest gig-speed network. then went beyond. beyond chasing down network problems. to knowing when and where there's an issue. beyond network complexity.

to a zero-touch, one-box world. optimizing performance and budget. beyond having questions. to getting answers. "activecore, how's my network?" "all sites are green." all of which helps you do more than your customers thought possible. comcast business. beyond fast. with who we are as people and making everybody feel welcome. ordering custom ink t-shirts has been a really smart decision for our business. i love the custom ink design lab because it's really easy to use. they have customer service that you can reach anytime. t-shirts help us immediately get a sense of who we are as a group. from the moment clients walk in, they're able to feel like part of the family. - [spokesman] custom ink has hundreds of products for your business and free shipping. upload your logo or start your design today bolsonaro. david: "wall street journal" reporting that talks between u.s. and top china negotiators could include next month, u.s.

traded represent lighthizer and mnuchin to fly to beijing next week to meet with chinese vice premier. but there are reports that china could be back peddling on trade doconcessions. will we be able to get a deal with china we can trust. >> i am hopeful, but i think it doubtful. it feel like every time we take a step closer, it fells we go two steps backward. i don't see how we can get a deal that quickly, my guess is that president will have to prolong the agreement another 90 days if not longer. >> i'm hopeful we get a deal as well with robert, and i think everyone out there. i am not hopeful we'll get a deal to verify. i don't think that chinese -- the chinese said they will negotiate in good faith, that

denotes they were not negotiating in good faith for last 20 years, that is a problem. for them to say, they are stealing intellectual property theft they will stop, have to admit they are doing, that they will never do that right now, the president is hosting brazil president, they are -- brazil is helping them get around this. president hosts the president of brazil who is the one of main problem with our farmers long-term. >> interesting. i was in indiana last week, i asked how tariffs were impacting home, to my surprise, they were still supportive of the president, saying they understand the fight with china. i believe, that issue will be

enforcement. if you look back at everything that xi promised opponent in 2015. they have yet to live up to those promises. i am skeptical, perhaps we should look at a series of smaller deals, more meeting. in march in beijing right now the tops of the heads of the communist party, several committee are meet, president xi faced backlash at home, it does not surprise me he pushed up this meeting with president trump. >> just think it of. if you were the chinese what would you do? you would wait out this administration to get a friendlier administration possible. but i want to go to idea of tariffs, isn't a tariff when they steal intellectual property from our companies, the they cat

compete in asia. i think that these issues are big and complex and were not being addressed bev this administration, nothing of get done, this administration is actually trying to get something done. the market would like less rhetoric from the current administration. i don't want the market to move one way or another based on whether navarro is going to dinner or not. >> interesting. you say that, about the farmers, i am hearing the other side. they were upset they had a bailout. >> when did you talk. >> recently, we have a lot of democrat in iowa right now. and so we had a bunch of conversations. we know we're on two sides but i would say, they were not happy they need a bailout, they much rather have business as usual, they were not happy with the president's budget where he cuts subsidies -- >> can i ask a serious question.

what would democrats do to counter china? how will they from a policy perspective, i understand from a rhetoric and tactic. but how will they from a policy perspective be different on china than trump. david: great. >> i have two things, to recommend one to go to tpp . >> you think that could pass the democrats. >> it did pass, tpa passed. that was my view, go to tpp, 11 of 12 trading partner in southeast asia would have been trading with u.s., x-china, new zealand, australia, indonesia, vietnam. and second thing, if they steal off property, this is criminal -- espionage. we should go after them and make

it criminal, and make it criminal for those buying it. >> i agree with that. david: the fact that we have this incredible story last week about now navy accused them of espionage against some of our most sensitive new technology, in particular this missile technology that was going to be put on submarines, that has been compromised by the chinese it has to be working its way to the trade talks. >> it shoul should be, a free wh robert's assessment, i think more likely i a mermaid before the democrats pass tpp . >> we know who took it off the table. david: a new lawsuit could change face of real estate in use has we know it, next.

ok look, if you're not the lead dog, the scenery never changes. that's why this is the view for every other full-size pickup. and this year, it's déjà vu all over again 'cuz only the ford f-150 with its high strength, military-grade aluminum alloy body gives you best-in-class torque, best-in-class payload... and you got it, baby... best-in-class towing. still leading the pack.

this is the big dog! this is the ford f-150. it doesn't just raise the bar, pal. it is the bar. we're finally going on the trip i've been promising. because with expedia, i saved when i added a hotel to our flight. ♪ so even when she outgrows her costume, we'll never outgrow the memory of our adventure together. unlock savings when you add select hotels to your existing trip. only when you book with expedia. when it comes to reducing the evsugar in your family's diet,m. coke, dr pepper and pepsi hear you. we're working together to do just that. bringing you more great tasting beverages with less sugar or no sugar at all. smaller portion sizes, clear calorie labels and reminders to think balance.

because we know mom wants what's best. more beverage choices, smaller portions, less sugar. balanceus.org

david: a new lawsuit takes aim at real estate agent, the way they conduct business, the class-action lawsuit accuses national association of realtors and other groups enforcing home sailors to pay inflated commissions. joining us mantle williams. how to you respond? >> thank you for having me. we think this lawsuit is baseless and has no merit, because the state and federal courts have considered challenges to the mrvetion well,s, they concluded that multiple listing service benefits consumers. number one it encourages brokers to actually share the listing information. and it also encourages them to negotiate the commissions, we believe that the plaintiff in this situation, has really asserted something that is false, they are making case that

brokers don't negotiate. and our policy, code of ethics particularly say, buyers agents and seller agents negotiate the commissions. >> this is kevin kelly, isn't the whole idea behind this lawsuit is they are trying to get new entrance into field, saying, hey you are a monopoly, we want to open the process. and let new players come in. so it can be more transparent, if you to just fine, you won't be hurt? >> well, i think again, this is false because, it transparent, in a sense that the commissions are revealed to both seller and buyer agents and the consumers it is open in a transparent process. >> but not negotiated?

>> no. -- yes, it is. >> but yo you can't negotiate in one side? >> yes, you can, the buyer and seller agents have policy specific states that these commissioner to be negotiated. and to negotiate, and behalf of serving interest of serving consumer and client. i think there confusion on there is no negotiation, there is negotiation for benefit of the consumer. >> i am a homeowner, and i bought a couple homes in the past, i'm not aware that there is such an negotiation, i thought there was a set price, no one said to me, said, hey, it could be 3%, it could be 4%. or 6%. or maybe 1%. so, i would say, that you know real estate agent need to do a better job, why not start with 2%. why are they starting at 6% what

is the right number? >> there -- to be plain about it, there is no specific number, it is about able to negotiate a price, what we found is that you look at 85% of sellers and 89% of buyers, actually will go backs to real estate agent that sole them the home -- sold them home and recommend to someone else, the agents act on best interest of their consumers, so, everything is negotiable particularly when you talk about the commissions and buying a home. >> mantel, what is general commission level, if you say, 85% is negotiated, what is the normal percentage level that happened in 2018? >> with the particular commissions, again, there is no specific -- >> what was average? >> it depends on what market you

are in. >> united states average. >> no, it depends on the economic conditions. we really just depends on market, and the economy, we can't say a blanket average. >> if you think this is a frivolous la lawsuit you have to have a average. >> what about as it relates to red fin, compass and all of these companies that are disrupting the market issue is that lawsuit a moot part when you have so much digital disruption? reain real estate city. >> agents provide a valuable service, when you buy a home, that the most complicated transition. so you need someone to make sure that you ar march you with a hoe -- match you with a house that fits your specific needs, you need someone to negotiate with

the attorneys, to negotiate closing, and someone to market and home stage your property. so, there is a lot that goes into this transaction. we think that real estates are en val -- invaluable, and consumer are better off with a realtor on their side. david: i am afraid we have run out of time, come back again on this, we appreciate you coming? >> thank you. david: one attorney general leading charge to take action, we're joined by lo louisiana attorney general jeff landry, next. obvious. sometimes, they just drop in. cme group can help you navigate risks and capture opportunities. we enable you to reach global markets and drive forward with broader possibilities.

cme group - how the world advances. ♪

david: calls for breaking up big tech continue to come. some states attorney general claim our leaders in dc are not towing enough to address the problem, landry has led the

change. jeff landry is joining us now, thank you for joining us. sir, what do you think should be done with big check. >> a great question. one we're looking at, a number of different avenues, conversation that attorney general are having. i would say, a conversation among attorney generals on both sides of the aisle. >> jeff, mr. landry, thank you for coming on the she, looking at traditional monopoly in united states, last big 3, standard oil. there was a allegation of price fixing. you had at&t, again, you can

utility there was allegations of price fixing. and microsoft, such that microsoft had so much force over pc they forced you to buy microsoft word. this does not fit in the criteria, a free system, a free platform, you don't have to use it, how do you justify this a monopoly? >> i disagree with that, you look at the share that google has, in far of searchers made, i would tell you google is a monopoly in the amount of data they collect and searches that go on. what happened is that beginning. americans, consumers, had an expectation that when you would search for a particular product, you would get the bet product -- get the best product for best

price, it happened to me, i was looking for a cover for my dog, i got a big dog, he ripped it up. i looked for the cover, on first page, it kept telling me all i could buy was bed, i went to second which third page, i found the the cover. this is a expectation that people have out there, question is, is the consumer getting in it. this is one part of problem we see out of big tech. there is a multitude of layers, are consumers getting their badge for a buck. >> are in attorney general, what do you think about el elizabeth warren proposal to break up big tech? do you support her proposal? you know, i have not seen what her proposal is. how she will t to do it she is hitting a hot button, i think

that many americans out there' to see happen . attorneattorney generals are log for is the consumer being protected. >> california passed a law on this, it goes intoes effect jan, where are you in working with california on this. california leading the way we'll be able to see what information they are collecting, who they share it with, whether they can or cannot share informing on children under 18. i don't understand how it says

that louisiana is leading charge, and attorney generals are what california has already passed the law. >> i don't know that california's law is workable, we heard from people in the industry as a whole. that eu, when the eu passed their law, that ended up being on side of big tech. rather than on the consumer. aim o how do they use the data,s it open to everyone, is it open to market. can anyone go out there and access that? those are all questions that attorney generals are looking for. i would not tell you that california is leading in anyway. >> a question, it feel like we're confusing idea of regulates the large tech giants versus breaking them up, it feels like you are talking about ways to regulate their actions not breaking up?

>> i don't think. i don't know, there are many of us in there that would like to say, have they become too big. should we have watched as they merged acquired other tech companies. buzz tha does that integrate thm such they control virtual marketplace. if the answer is yes, i would tell you, breaking up is possible. david: general landry thank you so much. come back. >> thank you. david: democrat 2020 hopeful liz warren, slamming the government for benefiting the rich, while outlining how her wealth tax will play for her other proposal. but does the ma math add up? next.

to be nobody but yourself in a world which is doing it's best to make you everybody else... ♪ ♪ means to fight the hardest battle, which any human being can fight and never stop. does this sound dismal? it isn't.

♪ ♪ it's the most wonderful life on earth. ♪ ♪ it's the most wonderful life on earth. if ywhen you brush or floss, you don't have to choose between healthy gums and strong teeth. complete protection from parodontax has 8 designed benefits for healthy gums and strong teeth. complete protection from parodontax. this is moving day with the best in-home wifi experience and millions of wifi hotspots to help you stay connected. and this is moving day with reliable service appointments in a two-hour window so you're up and running in no time. show me decorating shows. this is staying connected with xfinity to make moving... simple. easy. awesome.

stay connected while you move with the best wifi experience and two-hour appointment windows. click, call or visit a store today. who we are as people and making everybody feel welcome. ordering custom ink t-shirts has been a really smart decision for our business. - [narrator] custom ink has hundreds of products and free shipping. upload your logo or start your design today at customink.com.

>> when you have a government that works for the rich, and not working as well for anyone else, that is corruption. we need to call it out. >> we get 2% tax on 75,000 richest family in the country. we would have enough money to

provide universal child care and prek . for everyone child in america. and still have two trillion dollars left over. >> senator liz warren suggesting her wealth tax would pay for a slew of government programs she said would end in equities in america. but with some estimating price tag a hundred trillion in 10 years for her program, does it add up. >> problem with this, the government should not be decides who gets pre-k or universal child care. that is the biggest issue. why is it government job to take money from someone else then determine who gets what with it. the purpose of taxes for essential goods and services to run the government, if we had a flat tax, if we had quality like she is talking about in -- equal

equality in fax seaso tax that e great. 75 thousand pages of tax code is convoluted it will benefit the rich. >> i would not say i'm supportive for we'l wealth tax,i don't think that trickle down economics has worked well. middle class has been i would say they are lower end. and i'm not surprised that she is pelting this on the table. i am concerned about the fiscal discipline of the current tax policy, our kids are going to pay for it i don't think we have really figured out a good tax plan, i would not say taxing the 1% is going to pay for all of these programs though. >> yeah, first, does anyone notice that warren developed a

hillary clinton southern accent on the campaign trail. david: sometimes there. >> a, agree there is a little pl side, a savvy political move if you are running in a democratic primary, she is advocating something that will probably never get passed, it is easy to beat up the rich. i do not see this something they will have any bipartisan support. in congress. so, the real question is, is -- will anyone step forward in this democrat primary and be honest with their voters, about the programs they are foreclosing that the nef never get paid for, only important that i have seen is mayor of south bend, said we can't talk about the -- paraphrasing, we can't talk about these programs, if we know we can't pay for them, i see a lot of promises, and boarderring

on verge -- bordering on verge the lying to voter. >> i agree, no one will defend the wealthy, not many people will say i defend the rich guy in the corner. but robert, i agree there is no fiscal discipline, we spend more on education than any other country, and we were 6th 20 years ago, we're now 27. the money is there we are failing our education system, putting more money into this fix the system first, if you can fix it particularly inner-cities, you fix the wealth inequality. >> to morgan point about democratic party, i am actually proud of warren last week she was asked are you a capitalist, her answer was yes, some people could not answer that. david: even capita capitalists. >> i am saying that business is

good. being a pro-growth democrat will be important. if we want to beat trump, the president trump you have to be pro growth. david: as someone worried about the debt, does it bother you, when she lists those program, in favor of the greenspan deal, and medicare for all. see this is leaning toward reparation for slavery, you add these programs, you reach a hundred trillion, if she taxed everyone -- all of the yieldy wy people, 100% would not. >> we have to make medicare, social security, 60 trillion hitting balance sheet every day, baby boomers turn 65. you talk about new entitlements, and guess what happens with entitlement programs they grow, i have never seen a entitlement purrinprogram that has shrunk. >> wait, wait. she did not start the program. >> i didn't say she started

program. >> medicare for all, she wants to start a lot of new program. >> there is a real debate as you know. there is a problem with climate change, a lot don't support the green new deal the way it has been written. it should just focus on paris accord. everyone right now is running an election, i am not shee here toy it surprising. no different from when president trump says mexico will pay for the wall, that was a campaign promise. >> a difference in aim, a hundred trillion versus a couple billion. >> all right, fcc is slamming elon musk for violating key terms in their settlement, what it could mean for the future of tesla, next. some things are out of

your control. like bedhead. hmmmm. ♪ rub-a-dub ducky... and then...there's national car rental. ..

might mean a trip back to the doctor's office just for a shot. but why go back there when you can stay home with neulasta onpro? strong chemo can put you at risk of serious infection. in a key study neulasta reduced the risk of infection from 17% to 1%, a 94% decrease. neulasta onpro is designed to deliver neulasta the day after chemo and is used by most patients today. neulasta is for certain cancer patients receiving strong chemotherapy. do not take neulasta if you're allergic to it or neupogen (filgrastim). an incomplete dose could increase infection risk.

ruptured spleen, sometimes fatal as well as serious lung problems, allergic reactions, kidney injuries and capillary leak syndrome have occurred. report abdominal or shoulder tip pain, trouble breathing or allergic reactions to your doctor right away. in patients with sickle cell disorders, serious, sometimes fatal crises can occur. the most common side effect is bone and muscle ache. if you'd rather be home, ask your doctor about neulasta onpro. pay no more than $5 per dose with copay card.

david: elon musk facing more heat from the scc. what impact will advice have on the future of tesla? >> i don't think it will have any impact. i think elon musk's problem is elon musk himself. going on joe ro rogan's show dit help either. he's taken america to the front of the space race. his problem is not building products. his problem is manufacturing products. he promises 500 this year but that's not enough cash flow. i wouldn't be a buyer of this

stock. >> ultimately it will be up to his board and shareholders for how long he stays. i feel bad being critical of him because i think he's one of the most of innovative geniuses of our time. he should be in a position where he's harnessing that creativity for the betterment of everybody. he has only a matter of time until they put in new leadership. he cannot hold on to legal counsel. the problem he has is he should be the chief visionary. as you stated, they had production line issues and competition on their heels. the latest launch did not go well and the stock has been going down. he should be quiet and focus on the company. that's leading shareholders to see what's going on here.

>> tesla's stock is up 30% on the high. he's a rock star, but i'm not sure he should be a public company ceo because he doesn't want to be one. there are rules of engagement. and giving an idea of what your future factory models are and how many you are going to create, you have to be careful if you are putting it out there. david: i wonder if he's using these tweets as a diversion. they have production problems there and maybe he's using this as a diversion to take attention away to from what's happening with the model y. >> you have some type of tweet come out with elon musk. is there not much done about the fact that he's manipulating the stock prices.

he wasn't able to get it to 360 to do that. just ask elon musk or donald trump. >> or difficult vine nunes. president trump: we don't want to say exactly. i know exactly what i want to happen in venezuela. but we'll be talking about different things. all options are on the table. it's a shame what's happening in venezuela. the death and destruction and the hunger. hard to believe one of the wealthiest countries is now one of the poorest and impoverished cunning tris. if the maduro authorities would step aside it could be a truly successful humanitarian state. the last thing we want in the united states is socialism.