you get instagram at trish underscore regan. l see you tomorrow night live at 8:00 p.m. good night from dallas, texas. "kennedy" beginning right now. jamie: thank you trish. sorry democrat you blew it. the partisan nonsense about the mueller report is just not working. attorney hilliard entered william barr has decided to skip and can you blame him. will democrats subpoena the nation's top format question what i think they will. the senate judiciary committee they claim to want answers as to why barr chose not to charge the president with obstruction and the ag ask and then answer the question many of us have been wondering. watch. >> how do we get to the point where the evidence is now that

the president was falsely accused of colluding with the russians and accused of being treason of a russian agent in the evidence now is that was without a basis in two years of this ministration have been dominated by the allegations that have now been proven false. and, to listen to some of the rhetoric you would think that the mueller report had done the opposite. jamie: democrats responded with a bunch of predictable grandstanding as they always do during these things. let's start with mazie hirono. maisie, girl. >> mr. bar, the maker people know who you are no different, from rudy giuliani and the people who sacrifice, the reputation in the office. >> she called the president a grifter in the lyre.

and over to smear the ag and then minnesota senator who brought up michael cohen for some reason. and then got shut down. >> the report found that michael cohen's testimony to the house that the president repeatedly implied the cohen family members have committed crimes. do you consider that evidence to be an attempt to convince a witness to change testimony questioning. >> no. i don't think that could pass muster. those public statements he was making. jamie: he did have senators in his corner also predictably including south carolina judiciary chairman lindsey graham. >> do you expect to change your mind about the bottom-line conclusions of the mueller report? >> no. >> do you know bumbler questioning. >> do you trust him.

>> yes. >> thirty years roughly. >> to thinking of the time he needed? >> yes. >> do think he had the money. >> yes. >> together resources? >> yes. >> do you think he did a thorough job questioning. >> yes. jamie: did the attorney general make his case and is he right to skip mars testimony ? joining me tonight american first action-packed senior advisor john spicer is back. >> thank you for having me. jamie: kamala harris gave him a tough time and he did stumble there. i thought it was odd when he talked about the mueller report being his baby. was there anything here that was problematic for you? >> no, not really. i think he was calm, cool and collected. he really walked through the legal reaction to this if you will. he broke down in each question why the rhetoric didn't make

sense from a legal basis. that is what this was. we lost perspective as to what this was about. especial counsel was appointed by the department of justice to look into this matter. that special counsel report to the attorney general during the tenure to deputy attorney general, but this report was intended for the attorney general. the attorney general when a big step further by releasing it to congress in the american people. what he did today was explained the process, explain the conclusion in a think the other thing that is interesting and you alluded to this, we have lost focus in number of the democrats were contested the underlying facts. to hear the democrats -- they kept saying collision is not even a legal term, where we talk about it. i kept saying, i heard that for about seven months nonstop and

now suddenly the democrats have pivoted to its never been about collusion. i think they have lost focus on what they are actually fighting for not talking about a process. why did you write a four page memo the way you did, were you concerned about this reaction. jamie: let me ask about that. there were a lot of questions about that summary. i guess really is a summary depending on who you ask. the attorney general said, this is such a pressing matter because of the public interest in the case into the amount of time that has gone on in the fact that it entered around the president and took so much energy from his administration, therefore he felt obligated to put something out, in hindsight, he shouldn't have released that four-page document to members of congress into the public? >> i think you did the right thing. he made it very clear that they expected to get a redacted version from the special counsel

that they would've been able to turn around much quicker. that was not the case. so the attorney general said today, much like you would release a verdict summary right after trial and then the transcript of that trial comes out later. he was trying to make sure the american people in congress understood the bottom line. again, getting back to what i said a moment ago, the bottom line was was in collusion with the russians or any other entity that sought to undermine the integrity of our election. the attorney general summary, whatever we're calling it now. came out and made it clear that no there wasn't. that was what the main thrust of the council investigation was about. he is a further point, this is why this is a silly conversation that the democrats were having today. within days after the summary, the entire 400 plus page report came out. meaning if you do not agree with the summary, now you have it out there in a searchable way the you can look up, read it yourself. jamie: i think their issue is with special counsel and robert mueller's office in the investigation. and clearly the issue that they have their was that the president wasn't charged with

anything and they are making the case that the office of legal counsel -- basically informed her that they cannot charge a sitting president and if that is really the case in mueller was so invested in the fact that the president had broken the law, and he could approach the issue by charging him and forcing it through the court system so we could finally have a definitive legal answer on the most important question. if the president is so powerful that he cannot be charged and he can essentially fire anyone then that is a problem that's above the paygrade of the attorney general in the presidency. >> the other thing, the special counsel could have decided, he could've said, i don't believe the president could be charged, i do believe it's in violation of one of the ten incidences i'd like that. he did not do that. jamie: he could've given a clear bottom line but instead, i think

intentionally he created this that's open for interpretation by both sides to benefit each side politically. and i think in a sense given the amount of time, and resources in the money, isaac is cowardly. >> but here is the other thing, the democrats for all of their stock and mueller. he said this man is above approach, highest integrity -- gray, fine. my point, when he didn't reach the conclusion that they assumed that he would, now they have a problem. but mueller in any way shape or form could've done this. think of this, every single thing about this report in its handling in the way it's been handled over the past few years has leaked out in some way shape or form. including the letter, dissatisfaction. jamie: special councils that was

not leaked out and both sides were surprised that robert mueller was running that kind of shift. -- >> my point is this is to say that if there was some offense among the team that the president had violated the law and any way in terms of abstraction. that would be getting out. his team would make sure that that got out and it happened. that is because everybody put stock in the fact that there was this underlying collusion or illegality of some sort. jamie: we are have these terms that are meaningless, conspiracy, exoneration, things that really don't mean anything in the chaotic environment benefits the most partisan among us. it was good to see you friday night. thank you so much. >> it was fantastic to see you. good to see you tonight. jamie: now we go on with several presidential democrat hopefuls. there also weighing in.

cory booker, la harris and kirsten gillibrand call on the ag to resign immediately. the president explained why. >> resignation for the attorney general, that's what you guys want. >> i haven't even heard that, it's a ridiculous. he's an outstanding man, he's an outstanding legal mind and i heard he performed incredibly well today -- >> she was probably very nasty. jamie: meantime in the new york times offset today the e-mail draft, james comey claims he is ruining his own reputation because he is fallen under the president spell. how could that happen, according to comey "mr. trump each her soul in small bites and trum" cd

david are here. and trump 2020 advisory jason meister. welcome everyone. let's talk about this, the talking points that were clearly issued from some democrat leadership. they're all saying the same thing. and asking for someone's regular signature. >> you stupid. jamie: that ties they have to hi, how you doing. please resign. >> mueller said that attorney general barr did not mischaracterize the findings. mueller is not a writer, he does not have a show like rachel maddow. his opinion is irrelevant. here's what to indict or not indict. this is all about context and opinion. we have to go back to the center

investigation began on. which was a fake dossier that the democrats pay for and hillary clinton's campaign there was no collusion, no obstruction, it's a disgrace for the democrats. jamie: even the ag said i did not exonerate the president. >> the context is irrelevant. also matters as he did not find a crime and he did not indict. that's all that matters. jamie: what you see? >> it is not his or mueller's job to exonerate. that is not the responsibility of a prosecutor to determine if there is probable cause. jamie: those are all three different things. >> exactly. i thought bar was a rockstar today. i thought he did awesome. jamie: i didn't think he was a rockstar but i think he had stumbles. >> the harris cross-examination was good on whether or not you discussed the referring pieces of the white house and he did stumble there. but generally speaking he is the attorney general and the buck stops there.

and that is what he said this is over. he said this is over and let's move on and let's not use the justice as a political weapon. and that is what we need to take away from this. >> i want to bring cat in here because it was supposed to be about russia infiltrating the presidential campaign and using people close to a meeting including the president in order to fulfill their win. >> i don't want to be on millennial female here but m1. i'm going to say i can't even with this anymore. but this investigation gets smaller every time we talk about it. trump is a traitor, treasonous trader, working with putin, it's like the summary of this report that was released pretty much in full. it's like when you're fighting with your boyfriend you realize you are losing, you start with you don't care about me at all,

and then you talk about something four months ago. you know you're losing but you want something to grasp onto. that's exactly what tapping. jamie: when you have people like cory booker, kamala harris, what exactly did he do, that is a pretty serious thing to have done something -- >> for report. jamie: i'm going to give them my sense of what was in the report. i'm a pretty rational person, i'm a lawyer, i know my way around this radio. i broke a few calves if you will, i know you will. even that, another met him the reports going to be to redacted, there were some reductions but explanations why. >> another mad -- into shows that they have nothing when they start grasping at something small. jamie: oh gosh that sounds like my time. this is so much and we have even more with the panel. however, with the talk about the president. now accusing barack obama of doing nothing about russian

election meddling. if it was that big of a deal why didn't the former president not intervene. is he just trying to change the subject? guess what we will talk about richard fowler and they will butt heads and you will be somebody. yorty are. stay with ♪ ♪ ahhhh! ♪ we're here. ♪ ♪ back then, we checked our zero times a day.

times change. eyes haven't. that's why there's ocuvite. screen light... sunlight... longer hours... eyes today are stressed! but ocuvite has vital nutrients to help protect them. ocuvite. eye nutrition for today. 2,000 fence posts. 900 acres. 48 bales. all before lunch, which we caught last saturday. we earn our scars. we wear our work ethic. we work until the work's done. and when it is, a few hours of shuteye to rest up for tomorrow, the day we'll finally get something done. ( ♪ )

dad, it's fine. we have allstate. and with claimrateguard they won't raise your rates just because of a claim. that's why you're my favorite... i know. are you in good hands?

jamie: holy heck about russian interference in our election with president trump. he says they should take their grapes up with president obama because he says he had every opportunity to address it. but he chose to stand in the pub team instead. he calls out the predecessor during this morning to get on saying why didn't president obama do something about russian september the fourth november election. when told by the fbi he did nothing and had no intentions of doing anything. that is a fair question. the committee taking a step further with a new ad. >> when i saw president putin in china, i felt that the most effective way to ensure that that didn't happen was to talk to him directly. and tell him to cut it out.

jamie: headed out, you. as a presiden is a president ril a barack obama. >> he is impulsive and strength sometimes with his rants but he is absolutely right. if he posed such a grave threat to the 2016 election and they were trying to infiltrate various voting processes in the campaign itself, why wasn't president obama more vocal about that? >> i would love to get the answer to that one, but they were warned back in 2014, there was a credible report that the kremlin was planning a massive

disinformation campaign to destabilize western democracies. they had multiple years to plan and prepare for this. but mark quarter, the obama administration showed. even adam schiff called amount for this. from all the racket i've been hearing on the left that russian meddling rose the level of pearl harbor, why don't we panel commission, why do we go back and investigate whether there were failures in 2014 and 2015 and 2016. why did our intelligence security fail us? but more important, i would love to know, and i'm just suggesting this, the obama administration should tell him not to knock it off because they didn't want russia to blow up the iranian deal. >> i don't think it was people on the cybersecurity team i think there were a number of top officials in the obama administration that were told to not make a big deal out of this, but you have people like eric swalwell, adam schiff who took issue with the former

administration and they are very curious as to why president obama did it, and say this is what is happening with russia and if they were so worried about russians with the campaign, why not tell the campaign to look out? >> a couple things on this, number one, we do know that the leaders of the house and representatives were breached about the fact that they were infiltrating the election system and the infrastructures of various state of electoral systems. at that particular time mitch mcconnell blocked the statement. >> what about the campaign? because you have two different things and the mueller report was very explicit about that. you had russians who were trying to get into the campaign, and you also had russians at a state run operation of not only this information but also cyber

activity. and hacking, in various forms. why not tell the campaign ? >> i think there's the obama ministration that could've done a better job in hindsight of 2020. what is more interesting is the fact that the rnc in the trip administration released his campaign and given that the president has been in office for three years, we have not seen republicans or this president say anything about shoring up our democracy or the russians engaging in the election -- >> that's a really good point. i know you wanted to commission in 2020. we could've heard a lot more about cybersecurity and we haven't. obviously, that is not a priority. people love to complain about things. but you don't see a lot of solution oriented political out there. >> i am actually going to agree with richard on this. it troubles me, if you remember back in february 2018, when all

of the heads of our intelligence communities in cybersecurity were brought in front of congress, there were hearings about what the plans were for the future. i was terrified at the responses because it didn't seemed like there was much of a plan -- >> there is not a plan. you have china, cuba macedonia, korea, latvia, there are gonna do the exact same thing because why not. it doesn't cost them a lot of money, and it creates so many problems. >> i think you bring up an interesting point, when you have companies like huawei her trying to infiltrate our country, and infiltrate our military and election system that you would hope our congress could be having hearings about how we would solidify our democracy and ensure our state systems are not able to be infiltrated by foreign power and instead we are having hearings over and over again about hillary clinton's

e-mail of how we ensure voting machines do not get hacked. >> that should be of more concern. >> but what about walking and chewing gum. >> what we saw today in the barr testimony republicans got more testimony about hillary's e-mails instead of asking attorney barr what he is doing -- >> we don't have the answer. >> what i want to know from the attorney general what is he doing to ensure our democracy is safe in the election? >> i want to know what they are all doing, lawmakers -- >> we have to take a break but thank you both very much. coming up the violence in venezuela growing worse by the day. now the white house says military action is possible but libertarian from venezuela think tank from intervention. tank from intervention. in moments stay right

and i recently had hi, ia heart attack. it changed my life. but i'm a survivor. after my heart attack, my doctor prescribed brilinta. it's for people who have been hospitalized for a heart attack. brilinta is taken with a low-dose aspirin. no more than 100 milligrams as it affects how well brilinta works. brilinta helps keep platelets from sticking together

and forming a clot. in a clinical study, brilinta worked better than plavix. brilinta reduced the chance of having another heart attack... ...or dying from one. don't stop taking brilinta without talking to your doctor, since stopping it too soon increases your risk of clots in your stent, heart attack, stroke, and even death. brilinta may cause bruising or bleeding more easily, or serious, sometimes fatal bleeding. don't take brilinta if you have bleeding, like stomach ulcers, a history of bleeding in the brain, or severe liver problems. slow heart rhythm has been reported. tell your doctor about bleeding new or unexpected shortness of breath any planned surgery, and all medicines you take. if you recently had a heart attack, ask your doctor if brilinta is right for you. my heart is worth brilinta. if you can't afford your medication, astrazeneca may be able to help.

>> as venezuela continues the death spiral in the civil war, the trip administration are setting the table for military and invention to refuse to take that option off the table. the secretary of state says military action is possible, national security advisor john bolton is eager to speed up insecure the transition of power. obviously with some guns and muscle. not a mustache fueled pickle party although we want the option on the table. i'm right there. sending american troops to finish this body job would be disastrous. because the president has expressed his frustration for watch out for decking around in our hemisphere. if we break it, we buy it. think of the long-term cost of medicare role. venezuela, and american forces would be sent to die getting sandwiched in between a legitimate army and shady criminal quality bows which are

gangs of armed corrupt dogs who run black markets terrorized and tempered during entire neighborhoods in the enterprise was immediately collapsed with medeiros but departure. this is a recipe for long-term deadly warfare. we have no business being a part of. not only to preserve american lives but also not to cause civilian casualties. what is the price of perceived american imperialism. they covet as afghanistan and vietnam combined. only closer to us with worse outcomes. it is not just us versus craft videogame characters. we would be an instant proxy war with russia, cuba and probably china. we very proven we have never met a conflict we could quit, the mission creep would be monumental would be focused and forced to them. decades of crumbling infrastructure, grids and hospitals just to heal the perceptual damage of forcing ourselves into a neighborhood

brawl. i don't want the u.s. government to put the bill for our infrastructure and healthcare let alone venezuela's. if juan guaido thanks he has found his moment and can ship the tide to lift his vote, let him by the current. there can be a peaceful democratic transition. but that likelihood jobs if we inject ourselves and drowned herself in a number and list conflict. that is the memo. earlier tonight, venezuelan interim president juan guaido told that he is thankful for the chapter ministration support. >> we want to maintain the best relationships with the united states. in the chapter ministration, we want to thank them for the determination and the democracy i think it's very important in the people of the united states is following what is going on and there have been very empathetic with what is going on in our country.

we continue forward and we know we have the support of the united states in the international community. >> i am pulling for guaido to out the tyrant that is maduro, tenant the intervention make things so much worse. joining me now, u.s. spokesman for the libertarian venezuelan party, welcome to the show dinner. >> thank you for having me. >> tell me how you see this, how you see it ending and how you see the influence of the american military in venezuela. >> i agree with you that u.s. military act would be a mistake because it would be perceived of the region. but i disagree the fact that it is possible without external action of any kind of force you could be intelligence or any kind of military action from the region it is possible to do a peaceful transition. they have tried again and again, over 20 years to overthrow this

dictatorship and we have not been able because we are unarmed. >> unfortunately, a lot of people in venezuela are not unarmed. that is the collective bows because of the way the chavez regime armed people who were opposed to him and his leadership and by arming them in creating the visual into bands he essentially popped up black markets which thrive what rest of the nation stars. my worry is even if it wasn't a lateral later action and venezuela in the united states even if we have partners who can be in brazil and even canada and lord knows who else. we would still be the ones to foot the bill. we would still be the ones seen as imperialist invaders and we would be the ones that have to rebuild the infrastructure that chavez and maduro has run into the ground.

>> let me be clear on this i am not supporting full ground invasion. i completely disagree with that. but the venezuela parliament has to activate 187 and numeral 11 in our constitution which allows our country juan guaido to address other countries to assist our legitimate forces which are part of the venezuelan military that supports us into taking back our country. we just want to hire reelections. -- >> why is it been so hard for white out over the last 24 to 36 hours to get any traction with the military. he seems operating, there be more defection that he is admitted that there have not been a number of defections necessary in order to worse maduro out. why is that? >> many reasons. the cubans have infiltrated the military. the core of the military is impossible without them being jailed or tortured.

that is the main reason our problem to request for an action, and intelligence operation, capturing security members, there needs to be opposed in venezuela. >> let's say guaido is successful. how long do you think a transition of power would take and how long before venezuela sees the benefit of the legitimate democratic we are doing business with the united states questioning. >> most people would expect, we have seen countries after world war ii and after they have fallen, once the economy and prices are free to move without any government intervention, once the production is open to private businesses our country will store like germany after world war ii. or south korea after the korean war. i think it'll be a matter of months in humanitarian crisis

will end. in will be once again every country. >> they need those american refineries in order to make money off of the kind of oral reserves that you have ahead because they cannot continue like this in the short term with the chaos and blood shed in the streets. and in the long term with malnutrition in the brain drains. so we are absolutely hoping for a positive peaceful outcome. daniel think is a much. >> thank you for having me. >> i usually do not see eye to eye or i'd i die with 2020 democratic, but she did say this earlier tonight. >> i can tell you as a soldier martha, i have seen firsthand the high cost of war and pushing forth the civil war, pushing for the military force will only end up with were suffering with the

rudest berlin people. >> the 2020 candidate two, against u.s. intervention. most other candidates have been surprisingly silent. sociably be worried they were more into your voices. david bruno and jason meister, cat, i will start with you. if you are one of these candidates and you want the job, this is a very serious crisis. and you have to step up like you already have a job. you had to lay out your plan -- and i disagree with her a lot, but she is the only one saying no, this is a bad idea, i warned the universe. why are some of her other colleagues -- >> some people in this country like war because they equated with doing something. they say, okay it's bad over there, we need to do something, which remained we need to take military action. not only can we be the placement of the entire world, when we

try, we often make it worse. not just by killing americans but also as you mentioned in your monologue, civilians of those countries as well. we need to be very careful in trying to resolve these issues. the military action would be a huge huge mistake. >> do you think there are enough members in the administration who prefer a nonmilitary solution? >> yes. yes, i do. on your topic, i think there is so much uncertainty that they are scared to step out and take a position. if you are wrong then it is going to be a talking point, using debates and i think that is what we are seeing from the dems not stepping out. >> i would not say anything ever. -- >> unless you get your brand talking point from the dnc, why don't we ask a debar to step down. what would you do to fix venezuela? what is your philosophy? >> is all about barr, that is what they're looking at today,

and not even think about this. they should. we should bring them all out in the next town hall and start asking those questions. more frequent, would be now, the president has a strong leader saying all glasses on the table. we have not intervened yet but they're dealing with masses humans hearing crisis. their tanks are driving over people,. >> they are milking the u.s. >> there fighting for their lives, country and maduro's regime is annihilating people. >> there will be people that are softening us up. because they want to put us on the boiler. >> they do, it's unfortunate. it's a really, really bad solution to a horrible crisis. and a proxy war with russia and china doesn't end well and also doesn't and quickly. and that's the thing, i don't care who the ministration is, i don't trust anyone to get in, is not the getting in part, that is done with good intentions, short-term optimism.

it's a getting out the seems to be impossible and deadly and costly and we cannot afford that. >> i want to thank you all so much. coming up in the report claims the president is willing to drop in order to secure a trade deal with china. i will explain what is on the chopping block and how it could be the most important part of the whole thing. tim carney will shake his head tim carney will shake his head and shake his i can't believe it. tim carney will shake his head and shake his that there's a lobster in our hot tub? lobster: oh, you guys. there's a jet! oh...i needed this. no, i can't believe how easy it was to save hundreds of dollars on our car insurance with geico. we could have been doing this a long time ago. so, you guys staying at the hotel? yeah, we just got married. oh ho-ho! congratulations! thank you. yeah, i'm afraid of commitment... and being boiled alive. oh, shoot. believe it. geico could save you 15% or more on car insurance. that guy's the worst.

it's a revolution in sleep. the sleep number 360 smart bed, from $999... senses your movement and automatically adjusts on each side to keep you both comfortable. and snoring? how smart is that? smarter sleep. so you can come out swinging, maintain your inner focus, and wake up rested and ready for anything. sleep number is ranked #1 in customer satisfaction with mattresses by j. d. power. save $400 on select sleep number 360 smart beds. only for a limited time. 2,000 fence posts. 900 acres. 48 bales. all before lunch, which we caught last saturday. we earn our scars. we wear our work ethic. we work until the work's done.

and when it is, a few hours of shuteye to rest up for tomorrow, the day we'll finally get something done. ( ♪ ) the day we'll finally get something done. we see two travelers so at a comfort innal with a glow around them, so people watching will be like, "wow, maybe i'll glow too if i book direct at choicehotels.com". who glows? just say, badda book. badda boom. book now at choicehotels.com

♪ ♪ >> will come back. president trump want to try to deal with china he wanted somebody under badly but how much is he willing to give up to get make you happy. according to the financial times the white house is so eager that they would even drop the clause for chinese cyber theft. that is not but well for the

u.s. tech and ministry in the trouble ministration is pushing back on the report. if that's what it takes to hammer out a deal are we better off with no deal at all? here with me to it discuss, commentary editor and author of alienated america, a fantastic mother's day book. tim carney, welcome back. >> thank you. >> i think the cyber theft intellectual property part of the hold trade negotiation is the most appointing. >> so i put the concession into three different categories,. >> oh good. >> we want china to stop subsidizing all of its products and putting up tears. we want china to stop -- that is category one. don't do cyber theft stuff. don't force companies to hand proprietary information over to the government.

>> that tries me crazy. >> the third part is trump loves to say, but you promise to buy however, many barrels of soybeans or whatever they sell soybeans were. >> there always dangling the soybeans. >> there soybeans, cars and other stuff. so trump always wants the purchase promises because it's a win. he can show up at the factory and give a rally. if you are not liberalizing trade by tearing down the subsidies and tariffs, then you are not providing systemic reform. if the second category where you're really hung up on, or were trying to get them to stop doing the cheating type stuff. >> it is the cheating type stuff, that is part of the 50 year plan. we will not actually do the hard work, we will not invent anything, and we will not do anything remotely technologically creative, we will just take it from everyone

else and stand on the shoulders of giants and claim we are the tallest people in the world. >> you. this is sort of the legal justification of trump imposing the tears. so tariffs are taxes. congress is supposed to impose taxes. but congress long ago gave the president power to do tariffs if it was needed for national security. >> give me one more answer on the uighurs. >> they are being oppressed by the chinese government and there is not really assigned that our ministration -- >> only showing cable news especially in part-time that shines a light on them. and i want to thank you for that. -keep it down there. i have a system. -keith used to be great to road-trip with. but since he bought his house... are you going 45? -uh, yes. 55 is a suggestion.

-...it's kind of like driving with his dad. -what a sign, huh? terry, can you take a selfie of me? -take a selfie of you? -yeah. can you make it look like i'm holding it? -he did show us how to bundle home and auto at progressive.com and save a bunch of money. -oh, a plaque. "he later navigated northward, leaving... progressive can't protect you from becoming your parents. but we can protect your home and auto when you bundle with us. run with us in the unstoppable john deere gator xuv835, because when others take rain checks... we take the wheel. run with us. search "john deere gator" for more. run with us. back then, we checked our zero times a day. times change. eyes haven't. that's why there's ocuvite. screen light... sunlight... longer hours... eyes today are stressed! but ocuvite has vital nutrients to help protect them. ocuvite. eye nutrition for today.

the latest inisn't just a store.ty it's a save more with a new kind of wireless network store. it's a look what your wifi can do now store. a get your questions answered by awesome experts store. it's a now there's one store that connects your life like never before store. the xfinity store is here. and it's simple, easy, awesome.

>> some exciting news. this is moving the music video worked to new work new jersey. they wanted to go someplace but caracas was booked. this is a tropical storm topic number one. we began tonight at an oklahoma carwash where the prices are steel. a woman was vacuuming her truck when a thief came along. witnesses thought she was friends with a man but that

story did not wash, the truck is a goner. the manner under manager has reversed the charges. the police are asking for the public's health. finding the correct criminal, he is believed to believe no one would ever go. kiersten hillebrand comes from beer pong. topic number two. let's get a north greenville university wiring outfielder made a grab that would make joe biden prop. this looked like a sheer homerun but there are no safe spaces with jeff flake chandler, slipped over the wall and suffering from a minor bruce, less painful from the other ways people catch them and college. that's what my staff tells me. the video of the top-notch take away has seen 2 million times and he has raised any doubt that his parents bribed his way into

college unlike lori loughlin daughter. olivia did get a 4.0 and her first entered freshman year. but that's enough about her blood alcohol content. kindness in the uk, this is completely blocked up with accent. they discovered significant amounts of cocaine inside freshwater shirt. come on, this cannot be a real story. these bozos got caught doing blow in the lab and thought it's an experiment. the whole thing sounds ponderous until you check at the video of their findings. this fellow ran on the treadmill because his nose was running and when the experiment ended he offered to sleep with the scientist. if they give him another white lobster. google that when kiddos of course they refuse because the last time they ended up with

crabs. as we broadcast tonight scientists claim they need more funding to further their experiment with shrimp and if you asked me the whole thing sounds like a shell game. topic number four, the makers of crocs released another pair of shoes, it comes the defendant back on the back. whitney houston once saying matter what they take from me, they cannot take away, for the low price of $53. with the footwear comes with is the patch. in names of the friends and don't talk to you anymore. there is even enough room for a tiny calendar which is ironic because you don't have to worry about any dates. if you are interested in the issues there is a japanese website auctioning a few pairs online. it's worth checking out because it's only auction for the winners or losers. one customer just ordered 50

period. [laughter] ordering crack, is your brain on drugs. drugs. 2,000 fence posts. 900 acres. 48 bales. all before lunch, which we caught last saturday. we earn our scars. we wear our work ethic. we work until the work's done. and when it is, a few hours of shuteye to rest up for tomorrow, the day we'll finally get something done. ( ♪ ) the day we'll finally g♪ mmm, exactly!ug liberty mutual customizes your car insurance, so you only pay for what you need.

nice! but uh, what's up with your partner? oh! we just spend all day telling everyone how we customize car insurance because no two people are alike, so... limu gets a little confused when he sees another bird that looks exactly like him. ya... he'll figure it out. only pay for what you need. ♪ liberty. liberty. liberty. liberty. ♪

♪ what did i miss? [laughter] you ready to go? yeah. let's go! ♪

it's nice. ♪ you got this! ♪ woo! ♪ ♪ ♪ >> did you have the best hour of your day, thank you for watching, you can follow me on twitter an instagram as "kennedy" nation. you can see pictures of cupcakes and my dog. tomorrow's hate mail, friday --

thursday, tomorrow night on the show, mike baker and brad and the following is a paid advertisement for time life's video collection. (rock music) every year, on one special night, legends and superstars join together to celebrate rock and roll. (bruce springsteen) ♪ in the day we sweat it out on the streets of a runaway american dream ♪ (announcer) on these special nights, artists are welcomed into the rock and roll hall of fame. ♪ sweet emotion ladies and gentlemen... (steven tyler-style shriek) aerosmith. please welcome u2 to the rock hall of fame.